+ All Categories
Home > Engineering > Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

Date post: 09-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: jose-manuel-pages-sanchez
View: 3,531 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
29
theportandthecity.wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. [email protected] Port-City governance A comparative analysis in the European context [email protected] theportandthecity.wordpress.com José M P Sánchez - Architect & PhD Candidate - Hafencity University March 2016, Ghent, Belgium
Transcript
Page 1: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Port-City governance

A comparative analysis in the European context

[email protected]

thepor tandthec i ty .wordpress .com

José M P Sánchez - Architect & PhD Candidate - Hafencity University

March 2016, Ghent, Belgium

Page 2: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Evolution of the Port-City Interface

Stages in the evolution of port-city interrelationships

according to Hoyle's model (2000)

Page 3: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Changes in the maritime transport chain

Changes in the Port-City Relation

ISPS CODE

Page 4: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Study trip

6 port-cities

14650 km

15000 fotos

19 Interviews

Page 5: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Dimensions of Waterfront (re-)development

Schubert (2011)

Page 6: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

3 Main Topics:

Institutional Relation

Physical Interaction

Social Integration of Ports

Page 7: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Institutional Relation

North vs South

Centralized vs Decentralized

Different Investment priorities

Institutional and emotional

detachment

Who is the majority shareholder?

Page 8: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Institutional Relation

Land Ownership

Helsinki

Rotterdam

The City

Oslo

Marseille

The Port Autority

Genoa

Lisbon

The Central State

Page 9: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Institutional Relation

Relation between city and port

Relation between cities and port http://madeinmarseille.net/

Page 10: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

http://splash247.com/

http://www.maritime-executive.com

http://fionajack.net//

Institutional Relation

Port Community reluctant to change

The Unions The Port Companies

Page 11: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

N E G O T I A T I O N

Page 12: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Physical Interaction

6 cases – Many projects

Page 13: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Physical Interaction

6 cases – Many projects

HelsinkiWest Harbor

Kalasatama

OsloFjord City

GenoaBlueprint

LisbonWaterfront Plan

MarseilleEuroméditerranée

RotterdamKop van Zuid

Stadshavens

Page 14: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Physical Interaction

Table 1 Dimensions of waterfront

(re-)development for comparative

perspectives, adapted from

Schubert (2011). In the case of

Lisbon there is no current major

waterfront regeneration project.

Page 15: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Physical Interaction

Contracts

Long term agreements

Large compensations

Difficulties implementing the plan

Page 16: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Physical Interaction

Planning agencies - Quangos

Agencies created to deal with the specific

waterfront and port interface issues

Stadshavens

Frente Tejo

Genoa Lab

Euroméditerranée

Page 17: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Physical Interaction

Different Planning Paths

Classical approach: “port out – city in”

New approach: planning inside the active port

Page 18: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Physical Interaction

Classical Approach: “Port out – City in”

HelsinkiWest Harbor

Kalasatama

OsloFjord City

RotterdamKop van Zuid

Page 19: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Physical Interaction

New Approach: Planning inside the active port

GenoaBlueprint

RotterdamStadshavens

Page 20: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Physical Interaction

Combination of both tendencies

MarseilleEuroméditerranée

Page 21: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Physical Interaction

Single projects

LisbonNew Cruise Terminal

Braço de prata

Waterfront Public space

Champalimaud

Page 22: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Emotional Relation

Two Key Concepts

Social License to Operate (SLO)In its broader concept, fulfilling the expectations of stakeholder and local

communities in dimensions that go beyond the creation of wealth, i.e. the social

acceptance of port activities by local communities.

(Dooms, 2014)

Soft Values of Seaportsnon-socioeconomic values which include among others historical, sociological,

artistic and cultural sub-functions that form the soft-function of seaports

(Van Hooydonk, 2007)

Page 23: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Emotional Relation

4 Main Fields of Action

Education

Communication

Heritage

Social Agenda

Port-City Identity

Page 24: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Emotional Relation

Education

Collaboration with educational institutions

Port Centers

Page 25: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Emotional Relation

Communication

The port is a reality that

must be explained

(Van Stiphout, 2007)

Page 26: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Emotional Relation

Heritage

How can we integrate port industrial heritage in the

waterfront plans?

Musealization or new use?

Respect the local genius Loci

Page 27: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Emotional Relation

Social Agenda

Port Festivals – Open days

Folklore

Page 28: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

ConclusionsFrom Integration to coexistence

The context determines the solution for common issues

From Beauty Waterfront to Productive Waterfront

New role of the Port Authority – Beyond the Landlord

For the SLO the social integration of ports plays a key role

Page 29: Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.

theportandthec i ty .wordpress.com Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e

Crossovers

AIVP 15 World Conference

http://citiesandports2016.aivp.org/en/

Thank you!


Recommended