+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Portfolio Theory

Portfolio Theory

Date post: 10-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: manoj-bansiwal
View: 15 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Portfolio Theory
Popular Tags:
38
Portfolio Theory Himanshu Puri Faculty DIAS
Transcript
Page 1: Portfolio Theory

Portfolio Theory

Himanshu PuriFaculty

DIAS

Page 2: Portfolio Theory

HARRY MARKOWITZ MODEL

• The portfolio theory developed deals with the selection of portfolio that maximizes expected returns consistent with the individual investor acceptable level of risk.

• Model provides a conceptual framework and analytical tool for selection of optimal portfolio.

• As the model is based on the expected returns (means) and the standard deviation (variance) of different portfolios it is also called MEAN-VARIANCE MODEL

Page 3: Portfolio Theory

ASSUMPTIONS

• An investor is basically risk averse.• The risk of a portfolio is estimated on the basis of

variability of expected returns of the portfolio.• The decision of the investor regarding selection of

the portfolio is made on the basis of expected returns and risk of the portfolio.

• An investor attempts to get maximum return from the investment with minimum risk. That is for a given level of risk he attempts to earn a higher return.

Page 4: Portfolio Theory

HM Model can be presented in 3 steps :

• Setting the Risk-Return Opportunity Set

• Determining the Efficient Set

• Selecting the Optimal portfolio

Page 5: Portfolio Theory

Setting the Risk-Return Opportunity Set

• Starts with the identification of the opportunity set of various portfolios in terms of risk and return of each portfolio.

• Say ‘x’ number of securities available in which an investor can invest his funds.

• An infinite number of combinations of all or a few of these securities are possible. Each such combination has an expected average rate of return and a level of risk.

Page 6: Portfolio Theory

RISK – RETURN OF NUMBER OF POSSIBLE PORTFOLIOS

Page 7: Portfolio Theory

• The shaded area AEHA includes all possible combinations of risk and return of portfolios.

• Combination R represents risk level of r1 and the return level of r2.

Page 8: Portfolio Theory

Determining the Efficient Set• Efficient portfolio is one which provides the

maximum expected return for any particular degree of risk or the lowest possible degree of risk for any given rate of return.

• The portfolios which lie along the boundary AGEH are efficient portfolios.

• For given level of risk r3 there are three portfolios L, M and N. but the portfolio L is called an efficient portfolio.

Page 9: Portfolio Theory

• Also L is called the dominating portfolio.

• The boundary AGEH is called the Efficient Frontier.

Page 10: Portfolio Theory

Selecting the optimal portfolio• The HM model does not specify one optimal

portfolio.

• It rather generates the efficient set of portfolios, which by definition are all optimal.

• To select the expected risk-return combination that will satisfy investor’s preferences, indifference curve are used.

Page 11: Portfolio Theory
Page 12: Portfolio Theory

• All the points lying on a particular indifference curve represent different combinations of risk and return which provide same level of utility or satisfaction to the investor.

• Now, the efficient frontier can be combined with the indifference curve to determine the investor’s optimal portfolio.

• The investor’s optimal portfolio is found at the tangency point of efficient frontier with indifference curve.

Page 13: Portfolio Theory
Page 14: Portfolio Theory

• This tangency point marks the highest level of satisfaction, the investor can attain.

Page 15: Portfolio Theory

Finding the Efficient Frontier.

• The efficient frontier contains a very large number of portfolios.

• Not all portfolios contain all securities.• The upper right edge of the efficient frontier

corresponds to the single security which has highest expected return H.

• Any other portfolio would have a lower expected return because at least a part of the investor fund would be placed in other securities that have expected return lower than H.

Page 16: Portfolio Theory

• As he moves along the efficient frontier to the left, new securities enter the portfolio mix and some securities may leave the portfolio and this is known as corner portfolio.

Page 17: Portfolio Theory

Risk free Lending and borrowing

• It is possible in the HM model to build portfolios with higher utilities by combining risk free investments

• On Risk free lending or investment return is certain

• Standard deviation of the risk free asset is zero

• Examples: treasury bills, government securities

Page 18: Portfolio Theory

Risk-Free Asset

Covariance between two sets of returns is

n

1ijjiiij )]/nE(R-)][RE(R-[RCov

Because the returns for the risk free asset are certain,

0RF Thus Ri = E(Ri), and Ri - E(Ri) = 0

Consequently, the covariance of the risk-free asset with any risky asset or portfolio will always equal zero. Similarly the correlation between any risky asset and the risk-free asset would be zero.

Page 19: Portfolio Theory

Combining a Risk-Free Asset with a Portfolio

Expected return is the weighted average of the two returns

))E(RW-(1(RFR)W)E(R iRFRFport

This is a linear relationship

Page 20: Portfolio Theory

Combining a Risk-Free Asset with a Portfolio

Standard deviation: The expected variance for a two-asset portfolio is

211,22122

22

21

21

2port rww2ww)E(

Substituting the risk-free asset for Security 1, and the risky asset for Security 2, this formula would become

iRFiRF iRF,RFRF22

RF22

RF2port )rw-(1w2)w1(w)E(

Since we know that the variance of the risk-free asset is zero and the correlation between the risk-free asset and any risky asset i is zero we can adjust the formula

22RF

2port )w1()E( i

Page 21: Portfolio Theory

Combining a Risk-Free Asset with a Portfolio

Given the variance formula22

RF2port )w1()E( i

22RFport )w1()E( i the standard deviation is

i)w1( RF

Therefore, the standard deviation of a portfolio that combines the risk-free asset with risky assets is the linear proportion of the standard deviation of the risky asset portfolio.

Page 22: Portfolio Theory

Combining a Risk-Free Asset with a Portfolio

Since both the expected return and the standard deviation of return for such a portfolio are linear combinations, a graph of possible portfolio returns and risks looks like a straight line between the two assets.

Page 23: Portfolio Theory

Portfolio Possibilities Combining the Risk-Free Asset and Risky Portfolios on the Efficient Frontier

)E( port

)E(R port

RFR

M

C

AB

D

Page 24: Portfolio Theory

Risk-Return Possibilities with Leverage

• To attain a higher expected return than is available at point M (in exchange for accepting higher risk)

• Either invest along the efficient frontier beyond point M, such as point D

• Or, add leverage to the portfolio by borrowing money at the risk-free rate and investing in the risky portfolio at point M

Page 25: Portfolio Theory

Portfolio Possibilities Combining the Risk-Free Asset and Risky Portfolios on the Efficient Frontier

)E( port

)E(R port

RFR

M

CML

Borrowing

Lending

Page 26: Portfolio Theory

The Market Portfolio• Portfolio M lies at the point of tangency, so it has the

highest portfolio possibility line

• This line of tangency is called the Capital Market Line (CML)

• Everybody will want to invest in Portfolio M and borrow or lend to be somewhere on the CML (the CML is a new efficient frontier)– Therefore this portfolio must include all risky assets

Page 27: Portfolio Theory

The CML

• Individual investors should differ in position on the CML depending on risk preferences (which leads to the Financing Decision)

– Risk averse investors will lend part of the portfolio at the risk-free rate and invest the remainder in the market portfolio (points left of M)

– Aggressive investors would borrow funds at the RFR and invest everything in the market portfolio (points to the right of M)

Page 28: Portfolio Theory

Sharpe’s

Optimization

Model

Page 29: Portfolio Theory

Uses a single number to decide whether a security should be a part of portfolio or not.

i

Fi RR

A security is preferred to another if it excess return to beta ratio is more than the other security

Sharpe computes a number which is compared to the above ratio for all the securities. Only those securities are selected which have excess return to beta ratio above this number.

Page 30: Portfolio Theory

Steps in arriving at the optimal portfolio:

1. Calculate the excess return to beta ratio for each stock and rank it in descending order.

2.Find out all the stocks for which the excess return to beta ratio is more than a cut-off rate.

3. Determine the weightages in which the investments have to be made in the stocks in the optimal portfolio

Page 31: Portfolio Theory

SecurityMean return

1 7

2 15

3 17

4 12

5 11

6 5.6

7 17

8 11

9 7

10 11

Risk-free Rate=5%

Excess return

2

10

12

7

6

0.6

12

6

2

6

Beta

0.8

1

1.5

1

1.5

0.6

2

1

1

2

Ratio

2.50

10.00

8.00

7.00

4.00

1.00

6.00

6.00

2.00

3.00

Now arrange the securities in the descending order of the excess return to beta ratio

Page 32: Portfolio Theory

SecurityMean return

Excess return beta ratio

2 15 10 1 10.00

3 17 12 1.5 8.00

4 12 7 1 7.00

7 17 12 2 6.00

8 11 6 1 6.00

5 11 6 1.5 4.00

10 11 6 2 3.00

1 7 2 0.8 2.50

9 7 2 1 2.00

6 5.6 0.6 0.6 1.00

The securities are then selected using a cut-off rate.

Page 33: Portfolio Theory

Starting from the top, portfolios are constructed with the first portfolio including only the first security, the second portfolio including the first and second security and so on.

For each of these portfolios a number C(i) is computed where C(i) is given by the following equation:

i

i e

im

i

i e

iFim

i

i

i

RR

C

12

22

12

2

1

*)(

Where:

iancemarketm var:2

Page 34: Portfolio Theory

SecurityMean return

Excess return beta ratio

2 15 10 1 10.00

3 17 12 1.5 8.00

4 12 7 1 7.00

7 17 12 2 6.00

8 11 6 1 6.00

5 11 6 1.5 4.00

10 11 6 2 3.00

1 7 2 0.8 2.50

9 7 2 1 2.00

6 5.6 0.6 0.6 1.00

50

40

20

10

40

30

40

16

20

6

2

ie

Page 35: Portfolio Theory

Security

2 0.200

3 0.450

4 0.350

7 2.400

8 0.150

5 0.300

10 0.300

1 0.100

9 0.100

6 0.060

2

*)(

ie

iFi RR

0.020

0.056

0.050

0.400

0.025

0.075

0.100

0.040

0.050

0.060

2

2

ie

i

0.200

0.650

1.000

3.400

3.550

3.850

4.150

4.250

4.350

4.410

i

i e

iFi

i

RR

12

*)(

0.020

0.076

0.126

0.526

0.551

0.626

0.726

0.766

0.816

0.876

i

i e

i

i12

2

1.667

3.688

4.420

5.429

5.451

5.301

5.023

4.906

4.748

4.517

iC

Computing iC

Now only those securities are selected for which the excess return to beta is more than the corresponding C(i) value. So the first 5 securities are selected

i

Fi RR

)(

10.00

8.00

7.00

6.00

6.00

4.00

3.00

2.50

2.00

1.00

102 mfor

Page 36: Portfolio Theory

The cut-off ratio C* has to be such that all the securities above the lowest selected security are selected. In this case it turns out to be 5.45.

Page 37: Portfolio Theory

Determining the Weightages

The percentage X(i) to be invested in security say (i) is given:

N

ii

ii

Z

ZX

1

Where:

*)(2

CRR

Zi

Fi

e

ii

i

Page 38: Portfolio Theory

Security beta ratio   C

2 1 10.00 50 1.667

3 1.5 8.00 40 3.688

4 1 7.00 20 4.420

7 2 6.00 10 5.429

8 1 6.00 40 5.451

Z

0.090979

0.095585

0.077447

0.109789

0.013724

X

0.23477

0.246657

0.199851

0.283309

0.035414

2

ie


Recommended