Date post: | 05-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | karicahill |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 35
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
1/35
National College of Art & Design
Fine Art, Media.
POSSIBILTY. RISK. PEDAGOGY.
An ideology of the artist run space.
Kari Cahill
Submitted to the Faculty of Visual Culture in Candidacy for the Degree of BA (Hons) in
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
2/35
Fine Art, 2012
ii
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
3/35
National College of Art & Design
Faculty of Visual Culture
I declare that this thesis is entirely my own work and that all sources have been fully
acknowledged.
Signed:
Dated:
iii
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
4/35
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my gratitude to Emma Mahony for her invaluable research
assistance and support. Thanks also to the NCAD Library.
A special Thanks to Hannah Fitzpatrick, Greg Howie, Hugo Byrne and everyone who has
been involved with BASIC SPACE since its inception.
iv
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
5/35
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION5
BLURRING THE LINES BETWEEN ART AND CURATION.
Strategies and approaches to exhibition making...8
A PLATFORM FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVE
APPROACHES TO ART MAKING.
The role of the New Institution...16
POSSIBILITY, RISK, PEDAGOGY & ENGAGEMENT.
Presenting the synomity and comparisons between the ideology and practice of BASIC
SPACE and New Institutionalism...23
CONCLUSION...30
BIBLIOGRAPHY...34
v
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
6/35
INTRODUCTION
This thesis is an attempt to locate the position of BASIC SPACE, Dublin an artist-led
initiative which I co-founded in 2010 along with Hannah Fitzpatrick, Greg Howie, and
Hugo Byrne1 within the twentieth century genealogy of the artist-as-curator,
Institutional Critique and more recently, New Institutionalism. With reference to Hegels
Dialectic, and specifically the idea of an active space where infinite outcomes are possible
between the thesis and antithesis, I will consider how BASIC SPACE explores this space
between two static sides. The triad can be made form any number of opposing ideas, but
it is what happens inside the triangle that creates new ideas. BASIC SPACE explores this
space with each project or initiative.
Hegelian Dialectic is a term used to describe a theory of thesis, antithesis and synthesis.
Evolving from the thoughts of German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, the
dialectical method involves the notion that the form of historical movement, process or
progress, is the result of conflicting opposites.2 The triad consists of: The Thesis a
determined intellectual proposition. (An idea); The Antithesis the negative reaction to
the thesis; The Synthesis the middle ground formed out of the conflict
(Friedrich/Raapana, 2005)
The theory creates a structure similar to a triangle. If you imagine the conscious as the tip
of the triangle, then one side of the triangle as the thesis, the other as the antithesis.
Dissecting the angle between the opposing thesis and antithesis is the synthesis - a new
proposition arising from the conflict and holding onto the truths of both. This theory has
acted as a framework for guiding our thoughts and actions to a predetermined solution
(Friedrich/Raapana, 2005), but rather than accepting the restriction of the synthesis as asolution located half way between the two opposing ideas I am interested in looking at
every point between the two. From the instant you leave thesis to the instant before you
enter antithesis there are infinite possible outcomes.
BASIC SPACE has existed as a space for exhibitions and projects as well as seminars and
1Hugo Byrne is no longer involved in the organization and running of the space.2 The triad has been linked to philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, who used it to back
up their theory of communism. Hegel himself only used the term once and attributes it to 18 th
Century German philosopher Immanuel Kant.
6
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
7/35
discussions, and is generally defined as an art space. The ideology of the space is in a
constant flux; each project/initiative taken on questions the identity of the space. Through
this thesis, I will illustrate the influential factors, which circulate BASIC SPACE, in an
attempt to locate it both physically and ideologically. The development of the artist-as-
curator in the twentieth century, explored in the first chapter, will open up the question of
the relationship between curators and artists. Chapter one will demonstrate how the line
between art and curation is becoming more and more blurred. With many artists
travelling down the curatorial route within their own work, as well as curators considering
their curatorial ventures as art in their own right, a complex question of authorship
arises. I will consider various stand points in this argument, focusing on the views of
Anton Vidokle, Matthew Higgs, Rebecca Gordon-Nesbitt and Jens Hoffmann whose
varied arguments expand the complex discourse concerning curation. I will outline the
opposing strategies employed by curators; performative, editorial and artists-as-curators.
My interrogation of the self-reflexivity of developing curatorial strategies will lead onto a
discussion of the similarities between the theory of New Institutionalism and the
curatorial approach of BASIC SPACE; one as a counter-critical curatorial framework,
developed in small to medium scale institutions located mainly in the Nordic countries
and in Northern Europe, which oppose the establishment; and one, which through the
making of art, has become the manifestation of the idea that art can happen outside any
institution.
The second chapter will focus on New Institutionalism, tracing its history from
Institutional Critique through to its application as a platform for the development of
alternative approaches to art making and exhibiting. It will interrogate the ideas of
Charles Esche, as he applied them to Rooseum, Malm during his tenure there as director(2002-2004), and his opinions about the role of art as an instrument for progressive
thought and social change. Chapter two will also consider opinions opposing New
Institutionalism; claiming that it itself has become institutionalised, and marginalises art
practises not concerned with the same preoccupations. The final chapter will expand on
the relationship between BASIC SPACE and the characteristics associated with New
Institutionalism; comparing and contrasting the methods and approaches applied by each,
in an attempt to dissect and re-frame the boundaries set up by governing institutions. The
synonymy found between projects embarked on by BASIC SPACE and those under the
7
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
8/35
authorship of New Institutions will be outlined, especially with reference to each ones
ideology concerning risk, possibility, education, and engagement.
The factors circumventing BASIC SPACE are as important as the ideologies determined
by those involved. These factors range from the economic situation of the current
recession, the fact that the space is run by full time students, and the simultaneous
association with, and autonomy from, the adjacent National College of Art and Design
(NCAD). It is hoped that the following analysis of the evolution of BASIC SPACE as a
project, initiative and idea will determine its situation within a curatorial framework and
the larger genealogy of critique.
8
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
9/35
BLURRING THE LINES BETWEEN ART AND CURATION
Strategies and approaches to exhibition making.
Curation was first used in popular english literature only sometime before 1914 which
in etymological terms is a very short time. It is also not surprising that the word
curation was beginning to circulate through literature as Modernism considered one
of the most influential and important movements in art history was flourishing.
Modernism marked the beginning of lart pour lartart for arts sake a term coined by
the French in the late 19th century. Modernist artists began to question the value of art
and their philosophy was that the intrinsic value of art, and the only true art is divorced
from any didactic, moral or utilitarian function (Gautier, 1835)3 And so in order for art to
engage, impress or challenge, practitioners must place it within a context be it social,
technological, political or cultural.
The word curation is difficult to define, it is derived from the Latin curare to care
which implies a relationship of responsibility. Wiktionary.com, a wiki based, open
content dictionary variously defines it as:
1. The act of curating, or organising and maintaining a collection of artifacts.
2. The act of curing or healing.
3. The manual updating of information in databases.
And merriam-webster.com, the online version of the Webster Dictionary defines a
curatoras:
1. One who has the care and superintendancy of something; especially: one in chargeof a museum, zoo, or other place of exhibit.
But these definitions dont necessarily fit with the contemporary understanding of what
curation is and what a curator does. Furthermore, there is no option on these dictionary
databases to search for art curation, and so it is no wonder that artists, art writers and
3 Cited from Thophile Gauitier in his reviews inLArtiste (1865) through which he publicized
Art for Arts Sake theories through many issues. Gautier originally voiced his theory through
novels such asMademoiselle de Maupin (1835). The words can also be traced back to works by
Edgar Allen Poe, Benjamin Constant and Victor Cousin.
9
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
10/35
critics have long stuggled with the definition. In this chapter I intend to identify the
challenges that exist within the role of the curator of contemporary artistic practice. I
will consider the current debate which oscillates around two key and opposing curatorial
positions the performative curator and the curator-as-editor and their effects on the
exhibition as a vehicle for contextualising these practices.
At the forefront of Modernist Avante-Garde, and more specifically of Dadaist and
Surrealist movements, was the French artist Marcel Duchamp. Duchamp challenged
conventional ideas about art production, processes and markets as well as questioning the
role of the audience or viewer as a participant. He wrote: The creative act is not
performed by the artist alone; the spectator brings the work in contact with the external
world by deciphering and interpreting its inner qualifications (Duchamp (1957), Cited in
Jodovitz, 1998, p.49)
As artistic critique grew within Modernism so did the idea of curation and in 1938
Duchamp agreed to take on the role of the exhibition designer for the International
Surrealist Exhibition in the Beaux-Arts in Paris, a move which saw the beginning of a
radical questioning of the role of the audience and the gallery space. Duchamps
intervention quite literally turned the conception of what the gallery should look like on
its head. By suspending 1,200 coal sacks from the roof, covering ornate mouldings on the
ceiling, turning down the lights and blackening the walls, he turns the elegant Eighteenth
Century interior into a dingy grotto. Visitors were handed a flashlight on entering the
gallery which, in the darkened room, meant the viewers had to step closer to each work in
order to see what was there. This disregard for the rules of exhibition viewing and
proper distance along with the soot falling from the coal sacks onto the bourgeoisieaudience meant that the viewer, instead of being a pair of disembodied eyes was faced
with an inescapable situation of audience participation (ODoherty, 1989(b) pg 69). This
installation has proved to transcend time as its critique echoes in radical contemporary
installations.
Once again in 1942, Duchamp challenged the viewer in the the Madison Avenue venue of
The First Papers Of Surrealismexhibition. Using the buildings architectural details as a
backdrop, he tied a mile of string between each moulding, ceiling painting and chandelier,
10
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
11/35
creating a criss-cross web through which the other works in the exhibition could not be
properly seen. Through this barrier the viewer was cut off from the art and so had to make
decisions about how to interact alternatively with what was on show (ODoherty,
1989(b), pg 72). This challenge presented by Duchamp set the stage for curation to
expand and grow into what it is today; a vehicle for a contextual framework that makes
art a more meaningful activity (Dickson, 1998 pg 83).
This framework has, by and large, taken the shape of exhibitions, with a large proportion
of artists relying on exhibitions staged within/by art institutions in order to get their art
out into the world. The exhibition has become a right of passage, and curators and the
institutions they are associated with have the power to decide what is or isnt seen; they
act as mediators between the artist and the audience/public. Therefore, there is a level of
responsibility to the artist that isnt fulfilled by many existing curatorial structures. Over
the last 100 years, the role of the curator has grown from picking out and hanging
pictures, which would be more like the dictionary definition of a curator as a caretaker of
art pieces, to a role of an all encompassing promoter-come-organiser-come-producer, who
in many cases see themselves as artists in their own right. This increase in the power to
dictate what makes it into an exhibition, goes beyond any kind of rational reasoning when
it exists within such huge mega-gallery institutions, such as MoMA, the TATE and
Guggenheim franchises. Critics such as Anton Vidokle argues that curators are using
artists as their medium.
Curatorial practice portray[ed]s the figure of the curator as a knowledgeable and
transparent agent moving between cultures and disciplinesa cultural producer
par excellence. Furthermore, it seemed to suggest that art has become a subgenre
of the Curatorial (Vidokle, 2010)
Anton Vidokle, artist, writer and founder of the international art network E-flux, has
focused his work on experimental artistic education setting up projects such as
UnitedNationsPlaza (2006-2007) and Night School(2008-2009). He believes that the
shift in curation towards this cultural producer within the realms of established
institutions is something of concern. In his article Art Without Artists posted on E-flux,
he outlines his concerns that curators may well undermine artists by using their
production as a tool for realising their own ideas. He writes:
11
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
12/35
The necessity of going beyond the making of exhibitions should not
become a justification for the work of curators to supersede the work of artists, nor
a reinforcement of authorial claims that render artists and artworks merely actors
and props for illustrating curatorial conceptsmovement in such a direction runs a
serious risk of diminishing the space of art by undermining the agency of its
producers: artists. (Vidokle, 2010)
His accusations raise questions of authorship. When a work of art is contextualised by
being placed into a specific framework by someone other than the artist, who concieved
the work within their own personal context, who does the work belong to? Who takes the
credit for the idea? What Vidokle suggests is that curatorial practice is undermining the
artistic decisions and direction of the work being produced by artists. This is being done
in order to fit the objectives and conditions of how the curators want the work to be
viewed. Unless the curator works closely with the artist making the work, the initial
meaning behind the practice can be lost to the framework decided by the curator. In this
article, Vidokle is arguing that the role of creating the conditions necessary for the
production and reception of art lies with the curators and critics and not the artists. They
set the scene for audience expectation. If you are spoon fed the answer to a question; told
exactly what to expect and how to feel afterwards you may not recognise the other
elements that may be at play or those you werent told to expect. This undermines the
freedom of production and the agency of artists.
Many curators acknowledge this and have developed their curatorial practice on the basis
of a closer working relationship between artists and curators. Jens Hoffmann, curator,
editor, writer, and currently director of the Wattis Institute for Contemporary Arts at the
California College of the Arts in San Francisco, believes that this closer working
relationship has led to expanded curatorial practice. Notions of style, in terms of having a
recognisable methodology or approach (a characteristic associated with artists and
writers) begins to manifest itself in the realm of curation, as engagement between artists
and curators becomes more visible. Artists are considering curatorial routines within the
structures of power and institutions while expanding their practice, and in turn are
influencing curators to consider artistic (visual art) routines and concepts. (Hoffmann,
2005, pg. 324) This strengthening relationship by-passes the concerns of curators using
12
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
13/35
artists and, as each is influenced by the other, we are also seeing artists begin to curate
exhibitions themselves. However Hoffmann is a self-proclaimed performative curator,
who can be subjected to the criticism outlined by himself above. This hypotheses
outlines how uncertain and interchangable these ideas can be. While curating exhibitions
for which he could be accused of using artists. Hoffmann seems to deflect these
accusations by further enhancing these ideas again when he expands his investigation of
the relationship between artists and curator and artist as curator to the understandings
between artist and community/audience/public. His exhibition Institution 2, at KIASMA
in Helsinki, questioned the function of the art institution and was interested in a self-
reflexive process which is one of the characteristics of the theory of New Institutionalism
(Doherty, 2004, pg. 1), which I will explore further in the next chapter.
Vidokles concerns around curators using artists are echoed by critic, curator and writer
Rebecca Gordon-Nesbitt. In her essay Harnessing The Means Of Production (2003),
Gordon-Nesbitt voices a strong opinion that institutions are harnessing the energy,
imagination and ability of artists to express themselves. Gordon-Nesbitt, focusing on the
ICA exhibition, CITY RACING 1988-1998 A Partial View, 2001, she looked at the
contribution of artist-led space, City Racing, London to the artistic scene in the United
Kingdom during the 90s. (The artists showcased by City Racing were largely making
work in opposition to the dominant Young British Artists(YBA) culture of the London
art scene in the 90s). Using the example of how City Racing was represented in the
exhibition by its curator Matthew Higgs, she outlines her opinions concerning curatorial
roles within the context of representation: simply being aware of the local social
significance of artists-led initiatives and inviting them to the intitutions does not make it
ethically sound (Gordon-Nesbitt, 2003).
City Racing was an art space set up in 1988 by five artists recently graduated from art
college who turned an old betting shop into a gallery. Keith Coventry and John Burgess
along with Paul Noble, Peter Owen and Matt Hale began by squatting the building near
the Oval Cricket Ground in South London. The interior was grubby and almost
uninhabitable, but with limited funding, they hosted exhibitions, showcasing many local
young artists. Their ideology lay in their attempts to work with emerging artists in an
13
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
14/35
inclusive way. Rather than using their access to an exhibition space as a way of self-
promotion they also created a platform where emerging artists could exhibit without
commercial pressures. She says They diversified from showing their own work into
offering exhibitions to artists who generally would not have the chance to show their
work in London otherwise (Gordon Nesbitt, 2003). In 1996, after it had ceased operating
as an artist-run space, City Racing was invited to play an important part in the exhibition
at the Institute of Contemporary Arts (ICA) curated by Matthew Higgs. Existing primarily
as a platform for artists who couldnt get out there, City Racing worked with the artists to
put together shows that would best represent the artists. However in CITY RACING 1988-
1998: A Partial View, Gordon Nesbitt feels that Higgs exhibited a false representation of
City Racing by focussing on the artists who had become successful. Higgs, she feels, had
no regard for how inclusive City Racing had been and that omiting some of the lesser
known artists, went against the ethos of the space. The City Racers stated that they agreed
to this project so that they could further the exposure of emerging artists, but that was not
Higgs intention for the exhibition. They felt that a shared dialogue and exchange
between curator and artists was necessary for development of a comprehensive overview
of the inclusivity of City Racing. The resulting exhibition, they contended, was the ICAs
view of City Racings contribution, not the City Racers. Is this an example of curators
going too far in the framing and contextualising of art, risking losing the value of what
they are trying to frame? City Racing had a clear objective and manifesto to support
emerging artists whether famous or not, and through this exhibition City Racing was
framed in such a way that only the successful artists would represent the space.
In this case Matthew Higgs is portrayed in a negative light, but it is important to point out
that he titles the show A partial view, admitting it was not a full account of theideologies of City Racing as an initiative, but rather an overview (by an outsider) of the
art produced there. As curator of the exhibition, Higgs was given the responsibility to
make decisions concerning which pieces would go into the show. As an editorial
approach to curation, his decisions cannot be faulted. Higgs supposed concept for the
show was a representation of the contribution not success of the initiative to the
artistic scene in the UK in the 90s, and especially those who were working in opposition
to the fanatical YBA movement (which was underpinned by notions of fame and
glory).But although representing an alternative space/inititiative, which would surely
14
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
15/35
need to be represented through an alternative approach, to keep the ethos of the space
intact, Higgs can be criticised for approaching the whole exhibition from an institutional
angle. This is a good example of how the institution can shift the ideals of a particular
artist or group of artists and their initiatives to suit its own agenda and raises a very valid
question; who benefits from the exhibition?
Matthew Higgs, ironically, shares some of the positions put forward by both Vidokle and
Gordon Nesbitt. He is skeptical about curators having too much control over the
production of art, believing that curators often appropriate ideas and strategies from
artists, which they then put forward as their own. In an interview with cuartor, artist and
writer, Paul ONeill, Higgs states, Curators rarely create new approaches or
methodologies for exhibition making, they simply adopt or adapt strategies developed by
artists (ONeill, 2006, pg 2). He believes that artists are the driving force behind new and
exciting developments in art, not curators when artists are creating the rules or
parameterswe stand to gain a great dealart changes exhibition-making, I dont think
the reverse is true (ONeill, 2006, pg. 2).
In critiqueing the concept of curation and exploring its effects on art, we realise the
argument that curation does have an effect on the work of artists. The extent of this can
depend on whether the curator is aware of the effect of their opinions and whether the
exhibition is being curated by an institution or an individual. When the insitution is in
control there needs to be an degree of precaution by the artists, questions must be asked
concerning the overall benefit of taking part in such exhibitions. By all means there is
nothing to fault in artists who take part in large institutional exhibitions with the
progress of Institutional Critique, and its acceptance into the mainstream institutions there has been a distinct growth in the discourse between artists and curators. In the next
chapter this discourse will be explored with secific reference to the role of New
Insitutionalism, and its development in alternative approaches to art making and
exibitions.
15
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
16/35
A PLATFORM FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES
TO ART MAKING.
The role of the New Institution.
If we assume that every attempt to recontextualise strategies for exhibition making, and
every approach to re-framing art making, borrows from models already in place, then the
approaches used by BASIC SPACE, Dublin, shows similarities to the ideas within New
Institutionalism. New Institutionalism is a theory based on the multi-functional approach
to curation which exists most notably in Northern European art institutions, and which
has origins in the practice of Institutional Critique. It is interesting to note that although
New Institutionalism is the closest institutional model BASIC SPACE can be compared
to, it is in fact alternative, artist-led initiatives which inform much of the methodologies
that characterise the New Institution. The third chapter of this thesis will expand on the
relationship between BASIC SPACE and New Instititionalism, tracing synonyms through
their ideologies and practice, whereas this chapter will form the basis of knowledge that
will inform the parallels drawn in the next chapter.
Many artist-led inititatives centre around investigating how their localised art sphere
works. In an attempt to deconstruct any preconceptions of how artists are expected to
make work, exhibit work, gain access to audiences and frame their art within boundaries
set up by their previous governing institutions (most commonly the Art School), artists set
up spaces where a discourse questioning these assumptions can happen. Although most
artist-run spaces are run by recent graduates, BASIC SPACE was set up by students
which allowed an immediate questioning of the practice taught by art schools, in this case
NCAD. Exploration of these alternative spaces challenges ideas of education and systemsof working, thereby questioning top-down learning, and new approaches to exhibition
making and the production of art. Artists who take investigation and critique, of already
set boundaries, as the subject of their art fall under the heading of Institutional Critique.
Institutional Critique investigates the framework of art institutions and establishments,
with the desire to systematically re-frame and contextualise previously assumed
boundaries within any institution. Institutional Critique seeks to break down the structure
of institutions, examine them critically, and re-frame them.
16
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
17/35
Artistic practice concerned with this investigation of structures of institutions was
initiated in the late 60s by artists such as Michael Asher, Daniel Buren and Hans Haacke.
Burens first solo exhibition at the Galleria Apollinaire in Milan, 1968, consisted of him
blocking a glass door, the only entrance to the museum, with his signature stripes (Il
sAgit de Voir des Bandes Verticales Blanches et Vertes) He used these stripes as a way
of challenging previous notions of a space and how it was used, in later years
concentrating on museums, galleries, public and institutional spaces. Again in 1986, with
his 3,000 metre squared sculpture at the Palais Royal in Paris (Les Deux Plateaux), Buren
questioned the boundaries of contemporary art existing within public spaces as he filled
the courtyard with striped columns. Like Buren, but operating on a more directly critical
level of museum politics was artist Hans Haacke. Haackes critique focussed on social
and political systems; especially on the system of exchange between museums and
corporate bodies. In, Moma Poll, 1970, Haacke installed two transparent ballot boxes
inside the Museum of Modern Art, New York, as part of the Information Exhibition.
Printed above the ballot boxes was a sign which read: "Would the fact that Governor
Rockefeller has not denounced President Nixon's Indochina Policy be a reason for your
not voting for him in November?". Haackes intervention sought to reveal that Nelson
Rockerfeller was both governor of New York and a donor and board member of MoMA.
This question directly commented on the relationship between political sponsors and the
museum and had he not kept the question under wraps until just before the show opened
there was no doubt that at the time his proposal for a ballot box would not have been
accepted. (Buskirk, 2005, pg. 166-167)
A second wave of Institutional Critique emerged in the late 80s and 90s with a
younger generation of artists, including Andrea Fraser, Renee Green and Fred Wilson.Performance artist, writer and lecturer Andrea Fraser, in 1989, imitated a museum tour
guide at the Philadelphia Museum of Art in an attempt to highlight the museums
involvement in the commerce, sale and diplay of art. Typically drawing from political,
historical and commercial connotations of the art museum, Frasers intervention
highlights the museums agenda for art as enterprise. A later work, Untitled (2003),
consisted of an hour-long video documenting a sexual encounter between the artist and a
man in a hotel room. The man, an unidentified American collector, paid 20,000 dollars to
take part in this art piece and the contract was drawn up by the gallery representing
17
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
18/35
Fraser. Quoted in a New York Times Article, Fraser says, ''All of my work is about what
we want from art, what collectors want, what artists want from collectors, what museum
audiences want(Fraser, cited by Trebay, 2004). Her agenda to expose the power
mechanisms at work within the art institutution is contrasted by the humorous manner of
her wild gestures.
If Institutional Critique is considered the work of artists, New Instititionalism is
considered the work of the establishment (curators) and engages with the transformation
of art institutions from within, by using tactics of investigation informed by the institution
itself. It is envisioned largely as the third phase of Institutional Critique, where the
institution begins to internalise the critique which once operated against it in an attempt to
create internal reform. (Mahony, 2011). These investigations include questions of
curatorial practice, critical debate and transparency within institutional frameworks. New
Institutionalism is characterised by concepts of the temporary: transient encounters, event
based/ process based work, education and peer critique. It also focuses on socially and
economically contextualising the institution and its space within this context, by
attempting to redefine the art insititution through interrogation of not only the limited
discourse of art works but the whole framework supporting the institution (ibid). New
Institutionalism is largely the preserve of small to medium-scale, publically funded
European art institutions, with many spaces existing in countries with strong social
democracies, such as the Nordic countries.
Rooseum, located in Malm, Sweden is one such space. For the period it was directed by
Charles Esche (2002-2004), it was held up as being one of the most progressive New
Institutions in the Nordic Countries. Esche conceived Rooseum as a space of democraticdeviance, where incoherance, disagreement, uncertainty and unpredictable results were
encouraged (Esche, 2004, pg 2-3). This approach to curation, critique and art-making has
bred an ethos of social, active spaces. Currently director of the Van Abbe Museum,
Eindhoven, Esche, having experienced the fall of Cummunism while growning up in the
German Democratic Republic, is interested in the philosophical concept of possibilty as
an aid to rethinking the relationship between art and social change (Project Base Lecture,
Press Release, 2011). Art, he believes, gives priority to the imagination and has the ability
to become an instrument of progressive thought. In Rosseums mission statement Esche
18
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
19/35
notes,
Now the term art might be starting to describe that space in society for
experimentation, questioning and discovery that religion, science and philosophyhave occupied sporadically in former times. It has become an active space rather
than one of passive observation. Therefore the institutions to foster it have to be
part-community centre, part laboratory and part-academy (Esche, 2001).
To these ends, he imagines the experimental institution, not as a container for art, but as a
creative engine for re-thinking the change that can occur within our own personal
consciousness but also through society as a whole. (Esche, 2004, p.1) He is interested in
the impact visual art could and does have all over the world. In an interview for Artforum
Magazine with Mats Stjernstedt, Esche calls for responsive action to social change
through art, whether that is through imitation of the fluidity of capitalism, stating that art
centers are still rightly required, to serve and create possibilities for the society in which
they find themselves (Stjernstedt, 2001).
Within New institutionalism, there have been an array of projects developed which are
anchored in social and political awareness and pedagogy. To take the example of
Unitednationsplaza; Anton Vidokle in collaboration with Liam Gillick, Jalal Toufic,
Boris Groys, Martha Rosler, Natascha Sadr Haghighian, Nikolaus Hirsch, Tirdad
Zolghadr and Walid Raad, set up a temporary art school in Berlin between 2007 and
2008, after the cancellation of Manifesta 6, Nicosia, a project they had been working on.
Unitednationsplaza took the form of an independent long-term project involving artists,
writers, philosophers and curators.(unitednationsplaza.org) Existing now as an online
archive documenting the debates, workshops, seminars and essays, the
Unitednationsplaza started with the the desire that art and artists should engage with all
aspects of social life (Vidokle, Rosler, 2008) and held a strong desire on the part of the
organisers and participants of these shows to see their work as transformative social
projects rather than merely symbolic gestures.(ibid). The project is linked indirectly to
establishments but also directly when it was commissioned as a new iteration, under the
name Night School, which travelled to the New Museum, New York in January 2008.
Unitednationsplaza ticks all the boxes in terms of being a model of investigating
boundaries within New Institutionalism; socially and economically contextualising the
institution and its space within this context both in Berlin and New York, rendering it
19
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
20/35
transient and movable. It also ticked the box of pedagogy with the array of educational
discourses in that it took the form of an art school.
It is important here to note that there is considerable doubt surrounding the outcomes and
affects of New Institutionalism and its compulsion to broaden the ideology surrounding
art. This goes back again to the role of the curator and his/her responsibilty to the artist.
Claire Doherty states that rather than a broadening and expansion of ideas, I believe
weve seen a narrowing of the field(Doherty, 2006, pg.3). The field being different
kinds of curatorial strategies and interrogative practice talks, discussions, seminars,
exhibitions, education, performance, film, events. But what Doherty is suggesting is that
rather than opening up a platform for the development of alternative approaches to art
making and exhibiting, curators have begun to focus on art practices that deal directly
with strategies of investigation within what New Institutionalism stands for; thereby
closing the door to developments in practices that arent entrenched in notions of
mediation, self-reflexivity and interrogation of institutions. A gap has been created with
one side fully anchored in ideas of critique, which question the prescribed and non-
prescribed theories and positions of society within political realms and establishments. On
the other side, we have artists for example whose practice can be considered more object
based; spectacular, especially large scale practices which are embraced by the counter
model to New Institutionalism the corporatized art museum. These artists while still
making art; exploring ideas, criticality, alternative notions of education and practice
(ideas associated with the other side), find that because their art isnt necessarily framed
by the artists as directly complying with the disposition of New Institutionalism, their
work isnt considered relevant. Alex Farquharson, writer, critic and director of
Nottingham Contemporary, states that Curators interested in dealing self-reflexivly withthe structures of mediation inevitably end up privileging and creating an artificial demand
for art practices engaged in the same questions (Farquharson, 2003i, pg. 7). In The
Curatorialisation of Institutional Critique, 2005 Jens Hoffmann reflects a concern, that if
curators become wholly preoccupied with practices related to Insititutional Critique as the
only strategy of critical engagement, they will risk losing out on possibly new radical
strategies. Once a catalyst for interpretation and fundamentally challenging critical
engagement, curation distracted by these strategies will become merely a celebration of
self-reflexivity that ultimitely re-sanctifies the institution (Hoffmann, 2005, pg 334). His
20
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
21/35
opinions echoes with those of Andrea Fraser, mentioned above as an artist previously
preoccipied with notions of Institutional Critique, who is presently engaged in New
Institutionalism. In her essayFrom a Critique of Institutions to an Institution of Critique
she asks what happens when artists who previously critiqued institutions have now,
through their critique and New Institutionalism, become institutions themselves? (Fraser,
2005, pg. 2) She outlines her argument by presenting Daniel Buren and Hans Haacke, as
artists who, returned to corporate museum franshises such as the Guggenheim and
MoMA, once censored their work, and now put on huge solo shows. She claims that the
practises once associated with Institutional Critique, an alternative radical movement,
have themselves become Institutionalised (Fraser, 2005, pg. 1).
Having looked at the methods and approaches to practice, of New institutionalism that
span various disciplines of art, curation and critique, both praise and criticism become
increasingly evident. The very nature of New Institutionalisms self-reflexive,
questioning, discourse, allows it to be both an established ideology, as well as a
constantly evolving alternative to an established ideology. Going back to Hegels
Dialectic and the analogy that between the thesis and antithesis, there exists infinite
alternative standing points, ideologies, truths and ideas (the active centre), New
Institutionalism encapsulates the practice of stimulating this centre.
21
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
22/35
LOCATING BASIC SPACE
Presenting the synonymy and comparisons between the ideology and practice of
BASIC SPACE, and New Institutionalism.
There have been many parallels drawn between the strategies and ideals characterising
BASIC SPACE and those associated with New Institutionalism. While not intentionally
set up with the methodologies of New institutionalism in mind, there is a strong sense that
BASIC SPACE is asking some of the same questions that set the foundations for those
institutions and projects which exist under the umbrella of New Institutionalism. Four
major criteria come to mind when looking at these similarities: Possibility, Education,
Risk, and Engagement. In this chapter I will outline the synonymity between BASIC
SPACE and New Institutionalism, paying particular attention to these criteria. Through
this investigation I will hopefully give a sense of the somewhat unique position of BASIC
SPACE as a project, a building, a movement, a curatorial venture, and an idea.
BASIC SPACE was conceived out of the frustration felt at the lack of exhibition spaces
for emerging artists in Dublin. This reality existed alongside an abundance of commercial
properties left vacant by the recession. The belief behind the initial idea was that at least
one of those spaces could be transformed into an art space, and while changing the use of
the building; the organizing collective would also be creating cultural capital for the city
and support for ourselves and other emerging artists. After ten months of meetings and
negotiations, a prominent Dublin-based property developer drew up a contract that would
allow us to use a vacant warehouse without paying rent. The ten thousand square foot
property would stay on the market and there would be a two-week-kick-out period if
tenants were found. It was not the street front commercial unit anticipated when webegan the process, it was a hanger-sized warehouse, and so BASIC SPACE grew from the
foundations and physicality of this space.
Underpinning the ethos and ideology of BASIC SPACE are a number of circumstantial
factors the recession, the fact that the collective are all NCAD students, the unfurnished
state, the precarity of the availability of the building, and the lack of funds. The founding
members saw these factors as challenges and not setbacks. Each of these circumstantial
challenges have led the group to investigate more interesting ideas, for instance, the size
22
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
23/35
of the building led us to reconsider scale when large objects looked tiny in relation to the
building. The freezing temperatures during the winter months inspired artist Andreas
Kindler Von Knobloch to make a piece of work using a thermal infrared camera which
measured the temperatures of people who attended Half Way There, the inaugural
exhibition. Our lack of funding means that we havent invested anything that can be lost
into the building. As full time students, we have access to all the facilities NCAD has to
offer, including workshops and tutorials, as well as a body of artists who are engaged with
contemporary artistic practice. We dont have a set of guidelines we have to follow set
out by a governing body or institution. There was never any commercial agenda with
BASIC SPACE, which opened up opportunities to take on the space as literally four walls
and a roof with nothing inside, or as a space which had no previous ideals attatched, and
to figure out what that allowed you to do as an artist, a collective, a student and a
curator.These factors allow us to take more risks, while at the same time not risking
anything.
Charles Esches approach to curation and critique within the realm of art-making
interrogates the concept of possibility. These possibilities occur in the the form of
neither positive nor negative outcomes, but are reached through a desire to answer a
question or to unravel an idea without the pre-set boundaries of having to come up with a
finite result. This mirrors the appraoch of BASIC SPACE. Set up simply as a space for
things to happen (basicspacedublin.wordpress.com), the space allowed for the
possibility of failure and, like Esches Rooseum, Malm, for incoherent, uncertain and
unpredictable results. The acceptance that failure is just as inevitable as success alleviates
the pressure to avoid failure when embarking on a project and allows for increased
experimentation. Again, going back to Hegels triad, BASIC SPACE allows for theexistance of limitless outcomes and ideas.
One of the attributes which sets BASIC SPACE apart from other alternative spaces and
institutions is that it was set up and run by undergraduate students, as opposed to recent
graduates. In effect, this means that the running and organisation of events, access and
availablity of the space, and facilitation of projects and ideas all had to be negotiated
while engaging in full-time study. James Merrigan, a Dublin based artist, writer, critic and
founder of +BILLION- Online Art Journal made an observation relating to this in his
23
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
24/35
essay Historical Cases of the Subterranean Kindwhich reviewed Underground An
Exhibition of Works Below Surface Level(November 2011, www.billionjournal.ie) when
he compares the situation existing between BASIC SPACE and the National College of
Art and Design, and that of Gordon Matta-Clark and his relationship with his college.
Merrigan writes that although BASIC SPACE is affiliated with NCAD, the founders are
all NCAD students, the colleges student union insurance policy extends to cover all
student registered with NCAD to work in BASIC SPACE and the warehouse is situated a
mere 100 metres away, there is autonomy from the college. The disconnection between
NCAD and BASIC SPACE is clear from talking to tutors and lecturers from the college,
but it is inevitable that what each does influences the other. Merrigan talks about how
Gordon Matta-Clark describes his study of architecture in university as his first trap and
that without this trap, he would have had nothing to oppose, and perhaps would have
ended up an entirely different artist. Just as without NCAD, BASIC SPACE would not
have evolved the way it did. Not strongly against the attributes and virtue of NCAD, but
rather using the existence of these attributes as a starting point, to evolve and experiment
with other ways of working, learning, making and engaging, rather than just engaging
with what the art college teaches.
There is some semblance between the educational discourse of BASIC SPACEs projects
such as Half+Half (2011), and Summer Camp (2011) and Anton Vidokles project
UnitedNationsPlaza (2007-2008). As mentioned in the previous chapter,
UnitedNationsPlaza existed as a temporary art school dedicated to the idea of exhibition
as school. Using the model of an art school for an exhibition allowed a questioning of
what constitutes a learning experience; discharging assumptions that school signifies
learning while challenging the potential of an exhibition to facilitate educational discourse(Hadley, Maxwell, 2008). Summer Camp took the form of a six-week full time residency
with a high concentration on production, discourse, experimentation, critiques and
collective work. The artists involved dedicated six weeks of their summer to full-time
participation in the residency with a view to extending the college term into the summer
without the formal strategies of assessment, but maintaining the element of productivity
and activity. There was an emphasis on skill sharing and interdisciplinary practice with no
clear end point at the beginning. (Host Press Release, 2011) Like UnitedNationsPlaza,
Summer Camp andHalf+Halfacted as a tool to realize different forms of exchange and
24
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
25/35
discourse that could only exist outside the walls of an institutionalized art school.
Half+Halfwas concerned with interdisciplinary practices spanning different colleges and
specific courses. It grew out of the desire to explore academic disciplines throughout the
arts, humanities, sciences and technology sectors through the medium of art, and took the
form of two one-week seminars held in the warehouse. Half+Half was interested in a
form of art that looks beyond the self and personal experience towards collaborative
learning and communal engagement. (Fitzpatrick, 2011).
As Summer Camp evolved over the first few weeks, it became evident that the
participants were imagining an exhibition as the manifestation of what was happening;
that the doing was as important as the discourse surrounding it. There was a desire to
show work, as individuals but also as a collective; to turn our custom designed summer
camp into something more tangible, and an exhibition was the way this would happen.
This show, entitledHost, acted as a signifier of the experience of Summer Camp, and was
curated by the group as a whole.
It is important here to tackle the notions of curation within BASIC SPACE at this
juncture. Initiailly there was no sense that what was happening in Basic Space was in any
way involved with a curation process. This is possibly because a lot of what BASIC
SPACE does is out of necessity the necessity of providing a platform for emerging
artists and what is important to us at that time. Although we dont send out open calls for
submission and we dont hang any work for other artists, we work as a team/as a group of
autonomous individuals, or somewhere between the two, to turn an idea into something
more tangible through the means we see fit. This, in a nutshell encapsulates our curatorial
approach. It is about realizing potential in the present moment and challenges those whoknow about it to realize ideas through engagement (Fitzpatrick, 2011). NCAD, while
helping us achieve our goal to open a space up to the arts, also presents challenges.
Experiencing rigid structures around the areas of critique, tutorials, and examination
requirements in college, BASIC SPACE opened up the discussion for how we, given the
freedom, would assess ourselves; taking the boundaries, opening them up, and re-framing
them within the context of our needs and requirements. We introduced new methods of
peer-to-peer critiques, a process whereby the artist under critique is only allowed to talk
about their work after the rest of the group has discussed it. This seemed like a natural
25
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
26/35
thing to do as our position as emerging artists means that we have limited exposure to
critiques other than from college tutors. Existing alongside the institution but being
autonomous from it, has meant that we can investigate notions of education without
having to reach an answer. Similar to Charles Esches vision for Rooseum, BASIC
SPACE realizes a potential for self-perpetuated education and promotes experimentation
with no clear end point, possible uncertain outcomes, and the freedom to work without
boundaries. (basicspacedublin.wordpress.com, 2011i).
Through all the initiatives, projects, events, and exhibitions we have become preoccupied
with notions of challenges, and engaging with these challenges (doing and making)
provides an atmosphere of activity. The aforementioned element of risk and our current
situation means that we dont lose anything if a project fails or happens to take a
different direction than we originally planned. These were the initial ideas that led to the
conception ofUnderground - An Exhibition of Works Below Surface Level, which took
place in November 2011 and included the work of nine artists. The physical features of
the building have allowed us to consider different methods and approaches to making
work. Site specificity, in terms of 'taking on' the building, has become an integral part of
any project that is realized in BASIC SPACE. Until recently it operated as a warehouse
and still bears evidence of industry. Adjacent to each supporting wall, are trenches of soil;
long narrow pathways where the concrete has been removed; scars from the routine
survey of the foundations for a future construction on the land, planned before the
recession hit, and a constant reminder to all involved of the fragility of the buildings
existence. (Merrigan, 2011). In this exhibition, a specific objective was given to the
participating artists: Create a site-specific work that engages with the underground
(basicspacedublin.wordpress.com, 2011iii). This exhibition says a lot about the way art ismade in BASIC SPACE Artists used the idea of labour and the physical engagement
of digging into the earth as their way to explore and generate individual ideas for the
exhibition. The premise was that labour adds value to something; gives it value as art. Just
as the digging informed the practice of the artists involved in the exhibition, what BASIC
SPACE is, is what happens, what is done there, what is made. Directly relating to ideas of
deconstructing institutional presumptions the elements at play in Underground; the act of
digging/unearthing created a sense of value to the work being made, and while doing so
allocated it as art, and shift[ed] any predetermined notions the viewer may bring to an
26
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
27/35
exhibition of work (Wasser, 2011).
Understandably there are questions surrounding the longevity of an initiative that has no
funding and no stable residence. Its situation begs the question: Is there an inevitability
that BASIC SPACE will eventually fade away or be forced to join an institution in order
to continue? This question assumes that BASIC SPACE can only exist within a building,
that it needs four walls to exist. What sets us apart from New Institutionalism is that we
dont hold onto the importance of the physical building as a site for art. The ideas
manifested inside the warehouse could easily exist elsewhere. A reliance on state funding
often sees art institutions defeated during times of economic crisis, when arts funding is
one of the first areas to experience severe cuts. BASIC SPACE in this regard has the
upper hand, as it has been proven that it can evolve without any funding and without the
building it would continue to do so. The reality is that it is just an idea, BASIC SPACE is
a collection of exhibitions that happened; a community of artists who make work; an
investigation into methods of practice; a desire to create a self-sufficient support network
during a time of uncertainty.
27
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
28/35
CONCLUSION
The action of looking back poses many problems. In the case of BASIC SPACE, we have
always just done things and then talked about them afterwards. Being described as a
philosophical group4 recently baffled us, as we see BASIC SPACE as a practical space; a
place to get things done, whatever the outcome, whatever the reason. But then in
hindsight you can find the links between ideas, and apply theory to the practice stating
what you may not have been able to articulate during the process of making. This thesis is
a retrospective analysis of how and where BASIC SPACE fits into of the institutions of
the art world; how what we do could be compared to other projects and approaches. It is
also a way of locating co-ordinates for our position on a map. Ideally this thesis will
become part of a series of literature that interrogates the activities and ideology of BASIC
SPACE in relation to its position in the here and now. The retrospective nature of this
textual analysis creates a strange situation where BASIC SPACE is being objectively5
discussed and investigated in text, while at the same time it continues to change and
evolve without any concern for this thesis.
Alongside this thesis, BASIC SPACE has recently been invited to take part in a
programme running in the NCAD Gallery, which focuses on the history of alternative
spaces in Ireland especially strategic, independent, artist-run projects. BASIC SPACE
was asked to represent its work as a project where the process of exhibiting is as much the
subject of the work as the objects or ideologies. In other words, to translate what BASIC
SPACE does into an institutional gallery space. This prompted some very interesting
questions about how our activities would translate when contextualised in a typical white
cube gallery space, how this ideology would impress on BASIC SPACE? Other morebasic questions followed, would we make art or make an exhibition? Would we curate
other artists work or would we use the gallery space as just another building for a project
to take place within? The conversations that happened mirrored the ideas being
investigated in this thesis in relation to New Institutionalism, Institutional Critique and
4During a conversation between BASIC SPACE, and the NCAD Gallery board of directors.The discourse was centered around why BASIC SPACE was asked to participate in the gallery
programme, and what BASIC SPACE proposed to do with the space.5
Although I am a founding member of BASIC SPACE, and organize the day to day running, I
endeavor to remain as objective as possible in this thesis treating it with the same analysis as
if I was not immediately involved.
28
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
29/35
curation, and subsequently have informed our discourse. Projects like
UnitedNationsPlaza, Night School, illustrate the manifestation of ideas that bear
resemblance to the ideas important to BASIC SPACE. This invitation from the NCAD
gallery made us realise that although BASIC SPACE is an alternative space and
essentially autonomous from NCAD, we were not against the institution per se. On the
contrary, the relationship between the art college and BASIC SPACE has informed our
ways of working. Through our 4 years studying in NCAD we have been exposed to the
teaching methodologies of an institution. Granted that there has been space to expand on
the methodology to a certain degree, but for the most part, being part of the Irish
Education System, each department and faculty adheres to regulated criteria and
processes of teaching. While providing students with a trove of knowledge and
professionally taught skills and practice, there is a limit of opportunities to expand on, a
lack of experimentation with alternate ways of learning, or considering, work. BASIC
SPACE is a place that allowed us this exploration. Since BASIC SPACE was founded,
NCAD has experienced the growth of a series of part collective, part community within
the students in college who have a desire to expand their knowledge, not through top-
down learning, but through peer-to-peer critiques, group tutorials and skill-sharing
workshops. Due to the current economic crisis and the cutbacks, which have heavily
affected arts funding, students have realised the importance of gathering the skills to learn
and think independently, with no provisions, only the knowledge and opinions they can
share and refine together.
BASIC SPACE might fail in that it wont last forever. Its future is uncertain; access to
the building could be revoked for any reason, at any stage. Furthermore, no independent
funding limits the possibility of insuring the space following our graduation from NCAD,as currently we are covered by college insurance6. However, going back to the theories of
Charles Esche, when asked whether the closure of Rooseum meant that the project had
failed, he replied-
There isnt any experimental institution (New Institution) that you can point to, that has
6 Under NCAD Students Union Insurance Policy, all registered students are covered, anywhere
in the EU, by the policy as long as they can prove their activity to be furthering their studies.
Once we graduate this policy will still be in place, but only for registered NCAD students.
Anyone outside the college will have to supply their own insurance.
29
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
30/35
been a hundred per cent successfulthe point is that thats the very nature of what were
doingof course these institutions are going to fail. (Esche, interview with Kunstkritikk,
2011)
Rooseum closed due to funding cuts, but deciding to set up against an established modus
operandi was to embrace the possibility of failure. The closure of Rooseum has left many
questions unanswered; would it have produced greater and more varied publics given
more time? Would it have influenced more artists, or would it have self imploded as the
self reflexivity of its ideology spiralled into an all encompassing black hole, with nothing
being produced, just the same conversations happening over and over? Esches thoughts
about the success of projects like this resonate hard here. Its very nature meant that it
had an objective to be seen as a working model of an alternative approach to art
making, curating, education and the dissemination of ideas. It is the contention of this
thesis that Rooseum succeeded in doing this, and that Basic Space operating in the same
way has also succeeded.
One might assume that the goal of the New Institution is to take over and replace
traditional institutions to leave behind the old ideology and replace it with a new one.
This is not the intention. Replacing or doing away with long standing establishments
would mean disregarding everything that has happened within their walls their history.
The new ideas, once they get marked as an ideology have their own flaws and will be
opposed and reacted to. What Esche was trying to do with Rooseum was show an
alternative way of working, an approach that considered both time and place and that
could be emulated within the framework of another institution. The criticism of these
spaces exists only when you base their success on whether they are still operating, and
maybe in that sense BASIC SPACE has the upper hand in that it never had any funding inthe first place and so cannot lose its funding. The current building BASIC SPACE
occupies can be taken but, unlike New Institutions, there isnt an importance placed on
the physicality of the building, and so the idea can exist in another site.
Potentially BASIC SPACE fits the ideology of New Institutionalism; it adheres to its
methods and approaches, but equally, BASIC SPACE could possibly represent a counter
model to New Institutionalism in the future. This poses a difficult aversion in this thesis
to define BASIC SPACE with any longevity rather this thesis will locate its co-
30
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
31/35
ordinates at this present moment. BASIC SPACE is a space, which currently engages in
alternate methods of pedagogy, where artists can take risks with their work, and where
possibilities are realised.
31
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
32/35
BIBLIOGRPAHY
Baldessari, J. Craig-Martin, M (2009) Conversation in Madoff, 2009, The Art School
- (Propositions for the 21st Century), Cambridge Massachusetts/ London, United
Kingdom: MIT Press
Buskirk, M. (2005), The Contingent Object of Contemporary Art, Cambridge,
Massachusetts: MIT Press
Charlesworth, J. (2007) Curating Doubt, in Rugg, Sedwick, (eds.)Issues in Curating
Contemporary Art and Performance, Bristol: Intellect Books
Deliss, C. Roaming, Prelusive, Permeable: Future Academy in Madoff, 2009, The Art
School - (Propositions for the 21st Century), Cambridge Massachusetts/ London,
United Kingdom: MIT Press
Dickson, M. (1998), Another Year of Alienation: On the Mythology
of the Artist-Run Initiative, in McCorquodale, Siderfin, Stallabrass, (eds.),
Occupational Hazard: Critical Writing on Recent British Art, London: Black Dog.
Doherty, C. (2006), New Institutionalism and the Exhibition as Situation, in
Protections Reader, Graz: Kunsthaus Graz
Esche, C. (2009) Include me Out: Preparing Artists to Undo the Art World, in
Madoff, 2009, The Art School - (Propositions for the 21st Century), Cambridge
Massachusetts/ London, United Kingdom: MIT Press
Ford, S. The Myth of the Young British Artist, in McCorquodale, Siderfin,
Stallabrass, (eds.), Occupational Hazard: Critical Writing on Recent British Art,
London: Black Dog.
Gielen, P. (2009), The Biennale: A Post-Institution for Immaterial Labour, In Seijdel,
(ed.), Open 16 Publication, The Art Biennial as a Global Phenomenon, Strategies in
Neo-Political Times, NAI Publisher, SKOR
Hoffmann, J. (2005) The Curatprialization of Institutional Critique, in Welchman,
(ed.),Institutional Critiue and after, Volume 2 of the SoCCAS symposium, Zurich:JRP Ringier.
Hoffman, J (Ed) (2004) The Next Documenta Should Be Curated by and Artists,
Revolver, Frankfurt, Germany: / e-flux, New York / Platform Garanti Contemporary
Art Centre
Judovitz, D. (1998) Unpacking Duchamp: Art in Transit, London:University of
California Press.
Mahony, E. (2012) New Institutionalism and its Legacy(Unpublished manuscript.)
Montmann, N. (2005) Opacity: Current Considerations on Art Institutions
32
8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
33/35
and the Economy of Desire, in Montmann(ed.), (2005), Art and its Institutions:
Current Conflicts, Critique and Collaborations, London: Black Dog Publishing
Mouffe, C. (2002), For an Agonistic Public Sphere in Okwui, Basualdo, Meta Bauer,
Ghez, Maharaj, Nash, Zaya (eds.),Democracy Unrealized, Documenta11_Platform 1,
Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz
ODoherty, B. (1989a), The Gallery as a Gesture inInside the White Cube, The
Ideology of the Gallery Space (Expanded Eds), London: University of California Press
ODoherty, B. (1989b), Context as Content inInside the White Cube, The Ideology of
the Gallery Space(Expanded Eds), London: University of California Press
O'Neill, P. & Wilson, M.(Eds.), (2010), Curating and The Educational Turn, London:
Open Editions/de Appel
ONeill, P.(2007), The Curatorial Turn: From Practice to Discourse. InIssues inContemporary Art and Performance, Bristol: Intellect Books
Raqs Media Collective, On Curatorial esponsibility, in Filipovic, Van Hal, Ovstebo
(eds.) (2010), The Biennial Reader, Bergen Kunsthall: Hatje Cantz
Siderfin, N, Occupational Haazard, in , in McCorquodale, Siderfin, Stallabrass(eds.),
Occupational Hazard: Critical Writing on Recent British Art, London: Black Dog.
Vidokle, A (2009) From Exhibitions to School: Notes from Unitednationsplaza in
Madoff (2009) The Art School - (Propositions for the 21st Century), Cambridge
Massachusetts/ London, United Kingdom: MIT Press
Welchman, J.C. (ed),Institutional Critique and After, Volume 2 of the SoCCAS
symposia, Zurich: JRP Ringier
ARTICLES
Farquharson, A.(2006) Bureaux De Change, Frieze Magazine, Issue 101, Published
Setpember 2006.
http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/bureaux_de_change/
Article accesses October 2011
Farquharson, A.(2003i) I curate you curate we curate: feature on curating, Part 1. Art
Monthly Magazine, Issue 269, page 7.
Farquharson, A.(2003ii) I curate you curate we curate: feature on curating, Part 2. Art
Monthly Magazine, Issue 270, page 13.
Fraser, A.(2011) Where Do You Stand, Colleague? Texte Zur Kunst, Issue 81,
http://www.e-flux.com/announcements/where-do-you-stand-colleague-art-criticism-
and-social-critique-symposium-on-the-occasion-of-the-20th-anniversary/
Date accessed December 2011
Haake, H.(1975), The Role of the Artists in Todays societyArt Journal, Summer
33
http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/bureaux_de_change/http://www.e-flux.com/announcements/where-do-you-stand-colleague-art-criticism-and-social-critique-symposium-on-the-occasion-of-the-20th-anniversary/http://www.e-flux.com/announcements/where-do-you-stand-colleague-art-criticism-and-social-critique-symposium-on-the-occasion-of-the-20th-anniversary/http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/bureaux_de_change/http://www.e-flux.com/announcements/where-do-you-stand-colleague-art-criticism-and-social-critique-symposium-on-the-occasion-of-the-20th-anniversary/http://www.e-flux.com/announcements/where-do-you-stand-colleague-art-criticism-and-social-critique-symposium-on-the-occasion-of-the-20th-anniversary/8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
34/35
edition 1975.
Hadley+Maxwell (2008), Find Us at the Kitchen Door,Art Lies Contemporary Art
Journal, Issue 57. http://www.artlies.org/article.php?id=1583&issue=57&s=1
Accessed: January 2012
Vidokle, A.(2010), Art Without Artists?, E-flux issue 136, May 2010
Available: http://e-flux.com/journal/view/136 Accessed: October 2011
Vidokle, A., Rosler, M. (2008) Exhibition as School as Work of Art, ART LIES, issue
59.
http://www.artlies.org/article.php?id=1661&issue=59&s=1
Accessed: December 2011.
Wasser, F.(2011), Sisyphus Rishing A Review of the Underground Exhibition at
BASIC SPACE, Dublin, Critical Bastards, Issue 4.
http://criticalbastards.wordpress.com/2011/12/ Accessed: December 2011
ONLINE
Doherty, C. (2004) The Institution is Dead! Long Live the Institution! Contemporary
Art and New Institutionalism,Engage-Art of Encounter, Issue 15
http://www.situations.org.uk/media/files/Engage.pdfAccessed: October 2011
Esche, C. (2011)Historical Times: the capabilities of an art museum and how it comes
to terms with the world today, Project Base, Lecture Press Release, 2011,
http://www.projectbase.org.uk/talks-and-events/charles-esche-historical-times-
capacities-art-museum-and-how-it-comes-terms-with-
wo#/sites/default/files/_DSC5163.jpg
Accessed: December 2011
Esche, C. (2004), Whats the Point of Art Centres Anyway?
Possibility, Art and Democratic Deviance, www.republicart.net
http://republicart.net/disc/institution/esche01_en.htm
Accessed: October 2011
Esche, C.(2001) Can Everything be Temporary? Art, institutions and fluidity, series ofdebated on Netw, Context, territories, November 2001
www.proyestorama.org/00/INGLES/TEXTS/REDES/eschei.htm
Accessed: November 2010
Fraser, A. (2005) From the Critique of Institutions to Institutional Critique, Artforum.
New York: Sep 2005. Vol. 44, Iss. 1; pg. 278
http://www.marginalutility.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Andrea-Fraser_From-the-
Critique-of-Institutions-to-an-Institution-of-Critique.pdfAccessed: December 2011
Gordon-Nesbitt, R. (2003), Harnessing the Means of Production.
http://www.societyofcontrol.com/pmwiki/Akademie/uploads/Main/harnessing.htmVerksted #1, Norway: Office for Contemporary Art
34
http://www.artlies.org/article.php?id=1583&issue=57&s=1http://e-flux.com/journal/view/136http://www.artlies.org/article.php?id=1661&issue=59&s=1http://criticalbastards.wordpress.com/2011/12/http://www.situations.org.uk/media/files/Engage.pdfhttp://www.projectbase.org.uk/talks-and-events/charles-esche-historical-times-capacities-art-museum-and-how-it-comes-terms-with-wo#/sites/default/files/_DSC5163.jpghttp://www.projectbase.org.uk/talks-and-events/charles-esche-historical-times-capacities-art-museum-and-how-it-comes-terms-with-wo#/sites/default/files/_DSC5163.jpghttp://www.projectbase.org.uk/talks-and-events/charles-esche-historical-times-capacities-art-museum-and-how-it-comes-terms-with-wo#/sites/default/files/_DSC5163.jpghttp://republicart.net/disc/institution/esche01_en.htmhttp://www.proyestorama.org/00/INGLES/TEXTS/REDES/eschei.htmhttp://www.marginalutility.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Andrea-Fraser_From-the-Critique-of-Institutions-to-an-Institution-of-Critique.pdfhttp://www.marginalutility.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Andrea-Fraser_From-the-Critique-of-Institutions-to-an-Institution-of-Critique.pdfhttp://www.marginalutility.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Andrea-Fraser_From-the-Critique-of-Institutions-to-an-Institution-of-Critique.pdfhttp://www.artlies.org/article.php?id=1583&issue=57&s=1http://e-flux.com/journal/view/136http://www.artlies.org/article.php?id=1661&issue=59&s=1http://criticalbastards.wordpress.com/2011/12/http://www.situations.org.uk/media/files/Engage.pdfhttp://www.projectbase.org.uk/talks-and-events/charles-esche-historical-times-capacities-art-museum-and-how-it-comes-terms-with-wo#/sites/default/files/_DSC5163.jpghttp://www.projectbase.org.uk/talks-and-events/charles-esche-historical-times-capacities-art-museum-and-how-it-comes-terms-with-wo#/sites/default/files/_DSC5163.jpghttp://www.projectbase.org.uk/talks-and-events/charles-esche-historical-times-capacities-art-museum-and-how-it-comes-terms-with-wo#/sites/default/files/_DSC5163.jpghttp://republicart.net/disc/institution/esche01_en.htmhttp://www.proyestorama.org/00/INGLES/TEXTS/REDES/eschei.htmhttp://www.marginalutility.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Andrea-Fraser_From-the-Critique-of-Institutions-to-an-Institution-of-Critique.pdfhttp://www.marginalutility.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Andrea-Fraser_From-the-Critique-of-Institutions-to-an-Institution-of-Critique.pdf8/2/2019 Possibility, Risk, Pedagogy
35/35
Accessed:September 2011
ONeill, P.(2006), Curating Subjects Interview with Matthew Higgs. North Drive
Press, Issue 3. Edited by Paul ONeill
http://www.northdrivepress.com/interviews/NDP3/NDP3_HIGGS_ONEILL.pdf
Accessed: October 2011
Raapana, N., Friedrich, N.(2005), Introduction: Why study Hegel, What is the
Hegelian Dialect?,http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm Accessed
February 2012
Trebay, G. (2004) Sex, Art and Videotape,New York Times (Encounter), June 13
2004,http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/13/magazine/13ENCOUNTER.html?
pagewanted=all Accessed: January 2012
Ekeberg, J., Seihaug, J. (2011), Interview with Charles Esche, The Possibility of
Politics, Kunstkritikk, http://www.kunstkritikk.com/international-edition-en/the-possibility-of-politics/?lang=en Accessed: January 2012
PUBLICATIONS & PRESS
BASIC SPACE(2011i) http://basicspacedublin.wordpress.com/about/Updated 2011,
Accessed: August 2010
BASIC SPACE (2011ii) Host Press Release, HOST Opening 15 Sept, September 3,
2011http://basicspacedublin.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/host-opening-15-sept/
Accessed: August 2010
Basic Space (2011iii) Underground Press Release, New Show Opening November
10thOctober 28, 2011,
http://basicspacedublin.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/underground-show-opening-
november-10th/ Accessed: August 2010
Fitzpatrick, H. (2011) Half+Half Press Release. Information courtesy of Hannah
Fitzpatrick, Ireland
Open Dublin(2010) Open Dublin Proposal: For the Use of Vancant Properties in
Dublin.http://opendublin.wordpress.com/proposal/ Accessed: April 2010
http://www.northdrivepress.com/interviews/NDP3/NDP3_HIGGS_ONEILL.pdfhttp://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htmhttp://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htmhttp://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/13/magazine/13ENCOUNTER.html?pagewanted=allhttp://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/13/magazine/13ENCOUNTER.html?pagewanted=allhttp://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/13/magazine/13ENCOUNTER.html?pagewanted=allhttp://www.kunstkritikk.com/international-edition-en/the-possibility-of-politics/?lang=enhttp://www.kunstkritikk.com/international-edition-en/the-possibility-of-politics/?lang=enhttp://basicspacedublin.wordpress.com/about/http://basicspacedublin.wordpress.com/about/http://basicspacedublin.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/host-opening-15-sept/http://basicspacedublin.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/underground-show-opening-november-10th/http://basicspacedublin.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/underground-show-opening-november-10th/http://opendublin.wordpress.com/proposal/http://opendublin.wordpress.com/proposal/http://www.northdrivepress.com/interviews/NDP3/NDP3_HIGGS_ONEILL.pdfhttp://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htmhttp://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/13/magazine/13ENCOUNTER.html?pagewanted=allhttp://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/13/magazine/13ENCOUNTER.html?pagewanted=allhttp://www.kunstkritikk.com/international-edition-en/the-possibility-of-politics/?lang=enhttp://www.kunstkritikk.com/international-edition-en/the-possibility-of-politics/?lang=enhttp://basicspacedublin.wordpress.com/about/http://basicspacedublin.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/host-opening-15-sept/http://basicspacedublin.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/underground-show-opening-november-10th/http://basicspacedublin.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/underground-show-opening-november-10th/http://opendublin.wordpress.com/proposal/