7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx

1/12

POST ASSESSMENT MODERATION REPORT

Demonstrate the knowledge of ALGEBRA using linear systems to solveproblems (5262)

Programme Name: WLCNZ Diploma in Electronics

Unit / Paper Number: 5262 Paper Name: Demonstrate the knowledge ofALGEBRA using linear systems to solve problems

Level: 3 Credits (1-20): 20

Assessor Name: Muhammad WaseemSoomro

Moderation Date: 04 09 2012 Name of Moderator: Saud Altaf

Quick Report Yes / No Comment

Assessment attached

Marking Schedule/Model Answer attached

Samples attached

Suggested answers match the questions

Marking is Fair

Marking is valid

Marking is accurate

Marking is consistent

The student scripts are authentic

Moderator Signature Date 04 09 2012

Student Samples Paper A:

Student Samples Paper B:

7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx

2/12

Student Samples Paper C:

REPORT IN DETAIL

The Post-Assessment Moderation is based on 5 measures. The moderator must check theassessment for its Fairness, Validity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Authenticity.

PART A: FAIR

QUESTIONS YES / NO

1. Does the assessment meet the unit standard / learning outcome requirements?(Honest reflection)

2. Is the assessment produced appropriate to the unit standard / learning outcome?

3. Did all students have a fair chance to succeed in doing the assessment?(Guidelines / timeframe)

4. Has the assessment been impartially marked?

Comments

PART B: VALID

QUESTIONS YES / NO

5. Is the assessment precisely relevant to the learning outcomes / performancecriterias.

6. Is the assessment task current to unit standard / paper and / or industry field?

7. Is the assessment marking reasonable and logical?

Comments

7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx

3/12

PART C: ACCURATE

QUESTIONS YES / NO

8. Is the assessment edited / professionally presented and concise? Spelling /punctuation / verbs and tasks?

9. Is the way the assessment is written accurately enough to assess?

Comments

PART D: CONSISTENT (RELIABLE)

QUESTIONS YES / NO

10. Is the assessment consistent across the student samples?

11. Is the assessment marking at a consistent level?

12. Is the assessment presentation consistent with course requirements?

Comments

PART E: AUTHENTIC

QUESTIONS YES / NO

13. Has each student had independently carried out their assessments?

14. Is the assessment task authentic/relevant to the field / industry

Comments

7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx

4/12

7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx

5/12

Student Samples Paper C:

REPORT IN DETAIL

The Post-Assessment Moderation is based on 5 measures. The moderator must check theassessment for its Fairness, Validity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Authenticity.

PART A: FAIR

QUESTIONS YES / NO

1. Does the assessment meet the unit standard / learning outcome requirements?(Honest reflection)

2. Is the assessment produced appropriate to the unit standard / learning outcome?

3. Did all students have a fair chance to succeed in doing the assessment?(Guidelines / timeframe)

4. Has the assessment been impartially marked?

Comments

PART B: VALID

QUESTIONS YES / NO

5. Is the assessment precisely relevant to the learning outcomes / performancecriterias.

6. Is the assessment task current to unit standard / paper and / or industry field?

7. Is the assessment marking reasonable and logical?

Comments

7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx

6/12

PART C: ACCURATE

QUESTIONS YES / NO

8. Is the assessment edited / professionally presented and concise? Spelling /punctuation / verbs and tasks?

9. Is the way the assessment is written accurately enough to assess?

Comments

PART D: CONSISTENT (RELIABLE)

QUESTIONS YES / NO

10. Is the assessment consistent across the student samples?

11. Is the assessment marking at a consistent level?

12. Is the assessment presentation consistent with course requirements?

Comments

PART E: AUTHENTIC

QUESTIONS YES / NO

13. Has each student had independently carried out their assessments?

14. Is the assessment task authentic/relevant to the field / industry

Comments

7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx

7/12

POST ASSESSMENT MODERATION REPORT

Demonstrate the knowledge of CALCULUS by Differentiate functions anduse differentiation to solve problems (5265)

Programme Name: WLCNZ Diploma in Electronics

Unit / Paper Number: 5265 Paper Name: Demonstrate the knowledge ofCALCULUS by Differentiate functions and usedifferentiation to solve problems

Level: 3 Credits (1-20): 20

Assessor Name: Muhammad WaseemSoomro

Moderation Date: 22 10 2012 Name of Moderator: Saud Altaf

Quick Report Yes / No Comment

Assessment attached

Marking Schedule/Model Answer attached

Samples attached

Suggested answers match the questions

Marking is Fair

Marking is valid

Marking is accurate

Marking is consistent

The student scripts are authentic

Moderator Signature Date 22

10

2012

Student Samples Paper A:

Student Samples Paper B:

7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx

8/12

Student Samples Paper C:

REPORT IN DETAIL

The Post-Assessment Moderation is based on 5 measures. The moderator must check theassessment for its Fairness, Validity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Authenticity.

PART A: FAIR

QUESTIONS YES / NO

1. Does the assessment meet the unit standard / learning outcome requirements?(Honest reflection)

2. Is the assessment produced appropriate to the unit standard / learning outcome?

3. Did all students have a fair chance to succeed in doing the assessment?(Guidelines / timeframe)

4. Has the assessment been impartially marked?

Comments

PART B: VALID

QUESTIONS YES / NO

5. Is the assessment precisely relevant to the learning outcomes / performancecriterias.

6. Is the assessment task current to unit standard / paper and / or industry field?

7. Is the assessment marking reasonable and logical?

Comments

7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx

9/12

PART C: ACCURATE

QUESTIONS YES / NO

8. Is the assessment edited / professionally presented and concise? Spelling /punctuation / verbs and tasks?

9. Is the way the assessment is written accurately enough to assess?

Comments

PART D: CONSISTENT (RELIABLE)

QUESTIONS YES / NO

10. Is the assessment consistent across the student samples?

11. Is the assessment marking at a consistent level?

12. Is the assessment presentation consistent with course requirements?

Comments

PART E: AUTHENTIC

QUESTIONS YES / NO

13. Has each student had independently carried out their assessments?

14. Is the assessment task authentic/relevant to the field / industry

Comments

7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx

10/12

POST ASSESSMENT MODERATION REPORT

Demonstrate the knowledge of TRIGNOMETRY by Manipulating

trigonometric expressions, sketching graphs of trigonometric functions,

and solving equations (5268)

Programme Name: WLCNZ Diploma in Electronics

Unit / Paper Number: 5268 Paper Name Demonstrate the knowledge ofTRIGNOMETRY by Manipulating trigonometric

expressions, sketching graphs of trigonometricfunctions, and solving equations

Level: 3 Credits (1-20): 20

Assessor Name: Muhammad WaseemSoomro

Moderation Date: 05 11 2012 Name of Moderator: Saud Altaf

Quick Report Yes / No Comment

Assessment attached

Marking Schedule/Model Answer attached

Samples attached

Suggested answers match the questions

Marking is Fair

Marking is valid

Marking is accurate

Marking is consistent

The student scripts are authentic

Moderator Signature Date 05 11 2012

Student Samples Paper A:

7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx

11/12

Student Samples Paper B:

Student Samples Paper C:

REPORT IN DETAIL

The Post-Assessment Moderation is based on 5 measures. The moderator must check theassessment for its Fairness, Validity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Authenticity.

PART A: FAIR

QUESTIONS YES / NO

1. Does the assessment meet the unit standard / learning outcome requirements?(Honest reflection)

2. Is the assessment produced appropriate to the unit standard / learning outcome?

3. Did all students have a fair chance to succeed in doing the assessment?(Guidelines / timeframe)

4. Has the assessment been impartially marked?

Comments

PART B: VALID

QUESTIONS YES / NO

5. Is the assessment precisely relevant to the learning outcomes / performancecriterias.

6. Is the assessment task current to unit standard / paper and / or industry field?

7. Is the assessment marking reasonable and logical?

Comments

7/29/2019 post assessment moderation report.docx

12/12

PART C: ACCURATE

QUESTIONS YES / NO

8. Is the assessment edited / professionally presented and concise? Spelling /punctuation / verbs and tasks?

9. Is the way the assessment is written accurately enough to assess?

Comments

PART D: CONSISTENT (RELIABLE)

QUESTIONS YES / NO

10. Is the assessment consistent across the student samples?

11. Is the assessment marking at a consistent level?

12. Is the assessment presentation consistent with course requirements?

Comments

PART E: AUTHENTIC

QUESTIONS YES / NO

13. Has each student had independently carried out their assessments?

14. Is the assessment task authentic/relevant to the field / industry

Comments