+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Post-traumatic Perineal Pubic Rami Protrusion: A Simple Surgical Management

Post-traumatic Perineal Pubic Rami Protrusion: A Simple Surgical Management

Date post: 30-Dec-2016
Category:
Upload: davis
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
2
Case Report Post-traumatic Perineal Pubic Rami Protrusion: A Simple Surgical Management : Victor Voon * , Homa Arshad, Ben Davis Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom Keywords: malunion of pubic ramus fracture protrusion treatment abstract Although pubic ramus fractures are common, they usually heal without surgical intervention and result in little long-term disability. We herein present two cases of symptomatic malunion of pubic rami fracture, which was successfully treated with a simple and safe surgical technique. The patientslocal symptoms resolved afterwards. 便Introduction Although pelvic fractures are associated with a diverse range of complications, little has been written about the treatment of re- sidual symptomatic prominence of malunited pubic rami fractures. We herein present two cases of late presentation of symptomatic prominence of the malunited pubic ramus, which was successfully treated with a simple and safe operation. Case reports Case 1 A 46-year-old woman sustained a Type 2 (Young and Burgess classication) lateral compression pelvic fracture in a road trafc accident. The pelvic ring was xed by percutaneous insertion of sacroiliac screws, and the ring disruptions were stabilized by applying an anterior pelvic external xator for 3 months. The pa- tients initial recovery was uneventful. Two years after the injury, the patient presented with left-sided perineal pain on sitting and walking and dyspareunia. A clinical examination was performed, which demonstrated a tender prominence of the inferior pubic ramus in the perineum. Radiographs of the pelvis demonstrated a left hemipelvis malunion, with a prominent nonunion of the infe- rior pubic ramus (Figure 1). Because of her symptomatic dyspar- eunia, a gynaecological opinion was obtained to exclude any intravaginal bone prominence. There was no pre-existing psychi- atric disturbance. The patient was counselled for surgical trimming of the inferior pubic ramus. Surgery was performed in the lithotomy position through a paralabial incision directly over the bony prominence. A sharp dissection was carried down to the bone and then continued subperiosteally. The inferior pubic ramus was excised 2e3 cm with bone nibblers and osteotomes until no prominence remained. Closure was performed with absorbable sutures. There were no postoperative complications. Three months postoperatively, the patient did not have dys- pareunia and pain on walking and sitting. Case 2 A 47-year-old lady presented with right-sided perineal pain on walking, sitting, and in particular while riding her bicycle. At the age of 38 years she had sustained an unusual anterioreposterior compression pelvic fracture, extending into the right acetabulum. This occurred when she fell from a horse, with the horse falling on top of her. She underwent delayed reconstruction of her iliac wing after an initial nonoperative management of her injury because of pain. Clinically, she had a tender prominence of the inferior pubic ramus in the right perineum. Radiographic images demonstrated a malunited fragment of inferior pubic ramus, together with asymptomatic degenerative change of her right hip (Figure 2). There was no underlying psychiatric or gynaecological cause for her symptoms. Conict of interest: There are no conict of interest. * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation Journal homepages: www.e-jotr.com & www.ejotr.org 2210-4917/$ e see front matter Copyright Ó 2014, The Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association and Hong Kong College of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jotr.2013.12.005 Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation xxx (2014) 1e2 Please cite this article in press as: Victor V, et al., Post-traumatic Perineal Pubic Rami Protrusion: A Simple Surgical Management, Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jotr.2013.12.005
Transcript

lable at ScienceDirect

Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation xxx (2014) 1e2

Contents lists avai

Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation

Journal homepages: www.e- jotr .com & www.ejotr .org

Case Report

Post-traumatic Perineal Pubic Rami Protrusion: A Simple SurgicalManagement創傷後會陰恥骨突出: 簡單的手術治療

Victor Voon*, Homa Arshad, Ben DavisDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom

Keywords:malunion of pubic ramus fractureprotrusiontreatment

Conflict of interest: There are no conflict of interest* Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

2210-4917/$e see frontmatterCopyright�2014,TheHongKohttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jotr.2013.12.005

Please cite this article in press as: Victor V,Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation (2

a b s t r a c t

Although pubic ramus fractures are common, they usually heal without surgical intervention and resultin little long-term disability. We herein present two cases of symptomatic malunion of pubic ramifracture, which was successfully treated with a simple and safe surgical technique. The patients’ localsymptoms resolved afterwards.中文摘要

恥骨支骨折是很常見的,通常無需手術干預便可癒合,幾乎沒有什麼長期性障礙。我們描述兩個有症狀的畸

形癒合恥骨支骨折病例,利用一種簡單及安全的手術,成功治療患者的局部症狀

Introduction

Although pelvic fractures are associated with a diverse range ofcomplications, little has been written about the treatment of re-sidual symptomatic prominence of malunited pubic rami fractures.We herein present two cases of late presentation of symptomaticprominence of the malunited pubic ramus, which was successfullytreated with a simple and safe operation.

Case reports

Case 1

A 46-year-old woman sustained a Type 2 (Young and Burgessclassification) lateral compression pelvic fracture in a road trafficaccident. The pelvic ring was fixed by percutaneous insertion ofsacroiliac screws, and the ring disruptions were stabilized byapplying an anterior pelvic external fixator for 3 months. The pa-tient’s initial recovery was uneventful. Two years after the injury,the patient presented with left-sided perineal pain on sitting andwalking and dyspareunia. A clinical examination was performed,which demonstrated a tender prominence of the inferior pubicramus in the perineum. Radiographs of the pelvis demonstrated aleft hemipelvis malunion, with a prominent nonunion of the infe-rior pubic ramus (Figure 1). Because of her symptomatic dyspar-eunia, a gynaecological opinion was obtained to exclude any

.om.

ngOrthopaedicAssociation andHongKo

et al., Post-traumatic Perinea014), http://dx.doi.org/10.101

intravaginal bone prominence. There was no pre-existing psychi-atric disturbance.

The patient was counselled for surgical trimming of the inferiorpubic ramus. Surgery was performed in the lithotomy positionthrough a paralabial incision directly over the bony prominence. Asharp dissection was carried down to the bone and then continuedsubperiosteally. The inferior pubic ramus was excised 2e3 cmwithbone nibblers and osteotomes until no prominence remained.Closure was performed with absorbable sutures. There were nopostoperative complications.

Three months postoperatively, the patient did not have dys-pareunia and pain on walking and sitting.

Case 2

A 47-year-old lady presented with right-sided perineal pain onwalking, sitting, and in particular while riding her bicycle. At theage of 38 years she had sustained an unusual anterioreposteriorcompression pelvic fracture, extending into the right acetabulum.This occurred when she fell from a horse, with the horse falling ontop of her. She underwent delayed reconstruction of her iliac wingafter an initial nonoperative management of her injury because ofpain.

Clinically, she had a tender prominence of the inferior pubicramus in the right perineum. Radiographic images demonstrated amalunited fragment of inferior pubic ramus, together withasymptomatic degenerative change of her right hip (Figure 2).Therewas no underlying psychiatric or gynaecological cause for hersymptoms.

ngCollegeofOrthopaedicSurgeons. PublishedbyElsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd.All rights reserved.

l Pubic Rami Protrusion: A Simple Surgical Management, Journal of6/j.jotr.2013.12.005

Figure 1. Case 1 with nonunion of left inferior pubic ramus fracture.

Figure 2. Case 2 with malunion of right inferior pubic ramus fracture.

V. Victor et al. / Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation xxx (2014) 1e22

Please cite this article in press as: Victor V, et al., Post-traumatic PerineaOrthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.101

Surgical excision of the prominence was performed in the li-thotomy position using a paralabial incision, subperiosteal dissec-tion, and removal of the prominence with osteotomes and bonenibblers. The patient made an uneventful recovery without post-operative complications.

At 6-month follow up, the patient’s wound healed well, and herperineal symptoms had resolved. She could enjoy painless walking,sitting, and cycling.

Discussion

A majority of pubic ramus fractures will heal without compli-cations, whether isolated or in combination with more extensivepelvic and acetabular fractures.

Koval et al1 reported that 95% of nonsurgically treated isolatedpubic ramus fracture patients returned to their preinjury activitiesof daily living at 1-year follow up. Although disabling or unpleasantsequelae are unusual, they occur in some cases and it may bepotentially treatable.

Only limited studies are available regarding the management ofthis rare late complication of pubic rami fractures. The nonunion ofthe fractured bones can be treated with traditional surgical tech-niques. There were also case reports on superior pubic raminonunion treatedwith percutaneous screwfixation, internal plating,and external fixation for nonunion.2e5 However, only one publica-tion describing the management of local perineal symptoms due toprominence of the pubic rami secondary to insufficiency fractures ina patient could be found.6 These two cases demonstrated that localexcision of the bony prominence is a safe and simple surgical pro-cedure, which alleviates the patient’s local symptoms.

References

1. Koval KJ, Asharonoff GB, Schwartz MC, et al. Pubic rami fractures in a benignpelvic injury. J Orthop Trauma 1997;11:7e9.

2. AltmanGT,AltmanDT,Routt JrML. Symptomatichypertrophicpubic ramusnonuniontreated with a retrograde medullary screw. J Orthop Trauma 2000;14:582e5.

3. Simonian PT, Routt Jr ML, Harrington RM, et al. Internal fixation of the unstableanterior pelvic ring: a biomechanical comparison of standard plating techniquesand the retrograde medullary superior pubic ramus screw. J Orthop Trauma1994;8:476e82.

4. Matta JM, Dickson KF, Markovich GD. Surgical treatment of pelvic nonunions andmalunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996 Aug;(329):199e206.

5. Mears DC, Fu FH. Modern concepts of external skeletal fixation of the pelvis. ClinOrthop Relat Res 1980 Sep;(151):65e72.

6. Karim AA, Clayson AD, Jones AS. An unusual cause of apareunia. BMJ Case Rep2009:2009. pii: bcr02.2009.1629, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bcr.02.2009.1629[Epub 2009 September 2].

l Pubic Rami Protrusion: A Simple Surgical Management, Journal of6/j.jotr.2013.12.005


Recommended