+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Powder Technology Volume 18 Issue 1 1977 [Doi 10.1016%2F0032-5910%2877%2985006-7] E.S. Palik --...

Powder Technology Volume 18 Issue 1 1977 [Doi 10.1016%2F0032-5910%2877%2985006-7] E.S. Palik --...

Date post: 20-Feb-2018
Category:
Upload: muztika-andriana-rahmawati
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 4

Transcript
  • 7/24/2019 Powder Technology Volume 18 Issue 1 1977 [Doi 10.1016%2F0032-5910%2877%2985006-7] E.S. Palik -- Specific

    1/4

    Powder Techn o logy . 18 (1977) 45 - 48

    @ Elsevier Sequoia S.A., Lausanne - Printed in the Netherlands

    4

    Specific Surface Area hfeasurements on Ceramic Powders*

    E. S. PALIK

    General E iec t r i c Company . 1099 Iu mh oe Road . C lewe land . OH 111 IO USA. )

    (Received February

    15. 1977

    SUMMARY

    Surface area measurements on ceramic

    powders are determined by gas adsorption

    using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (B-E-T_)

    equation. Two methods are described: the

    static and the dynamic. Emphasis is placed on

    sample preparation prior to adsorption_ Data

    are presented which compare the two methods

    along with the results of a round robin study

    on surface area measurements on an alumina

    sample_

    In this communication the Brunauer-

    Emmett-Teller (B.E.T.) method of surface

    area measurement will be briefly reviewed,

    some remarks given on the importance of

    surface area data to the ceramics industry,

    some comparison data by static and conti-

    nuous flow methods presented, and finally a

    preliminary report issued on an ASTM surface

    area round robin _

    Briefly, in the static method of surface area

    measurement, the amount of adsorbed gas is

    usually determined by measuring pressure

    differences in a calibrated high-vacuum appa-

    ratus. In the dynamic or continuous flow

    method, the amount of adsorbed gas is deter-

    mined by concentration measurements

    utilizing a thermal conductivity detector_

    The B.E.T. principle is embodied in the

    well-known equation:

    P

    1

    =-+

    (C-Up

    Y P, -P) v,c v,c PO

    where P = equilibrium pressure of the gas,

    P,, = saturation pressure of the gas at liquid

    Na temperature,

    V =

    volume of gas adsorbed

    *Paper presented at the 8 t h Annual Meeting of the

    Fine Particle Society Conference, Chicago, August,

    1976.

    at equilibrium pressure, Vm = volume of gas

    required to form a monolayer, and C =

    constant related zo a special value of the heat

    of

    adsorption:

    C=esp

    HI -Hz

    RT

    where H , = heat of adsorption at the mono-

    layer point, and HZ = heat of condensation.

    This equation should result in a linear plot

    of P[V P, -P) against P/PO and the value of

    V, can then be calculated from the slope and

    intercept_ The equation is capable of describ-

    ing type 1, type 2 and type 3 isotherms de-

    pending on the C constant_ In general, it has

    been found that only type 2 isotherms (i.e.

    those with high C values) have well-defined

    knee-bends, which are essential for accurate

    V, values. For type 2 isotherms, the B_E.T.

    equation has been found to be valid generally

    between 0.05 and 0.3 relative pressure. The

    internal consistency of the equation has been

    demonstrated by many measurements on

    several solids, and the degree of correspon-

    dence between the specific surfaces obtained

    with several adsorbates allows confidence to

    be placed in the method_

    Having obtained the value of V, from the

    B-E-T_ plot, the following equation is em-

    ployed to calculate SW., the specific surface

    area in m*/g for the sample:

    S,&. = Nav,

    M,M

    where SW

    = specific surface area in m*/g,

    N = Avogadros number, 6.023 X 10 mole-

    cules/gram molecule, u = area occupied by

    one adsorbate molecule, 16.2 X 10p20 m* for

    N2, 19.5 X lo-

    20 m2 for Kr, V, = monolayer

    capacity in ml, M, = g ra m molecular volume =

    22410 ml, and W = sample size in grams.

  • 7/24/2019 Powder Technology Volume 18 Issue 1 1977 [Doi 10.1016%2F0032-5910%2877%2985006-7] E.S. Palik -- Specific

    2/4

    The analysis time can be considerably

    shortened by using a one-point adsorption

    method, particularly if a dynamic system is

    used, provided the C value of the sample is

    Iarge (>50). Most materials which eshibit a

    tvpe 2 adsorption isotherm with nitrogen have

    high C values and, therefore, present no prob-

    lem with one-point adsorption_ The error in

    most cases is less than 5% if C = 50 at a rela-

    tive pressure of O-3.

    First, some words on the importance of

    surface area data to the ceramic industry-

    Table 1 lists some of the properties of pow-

    ders which can be affected by the estent of

    the surface area_

    T-ABLE 1

    The iuflueuce of surface area on powder properties

    I_ Blending of particles

    2. Adherence of particles

    3. Hiding or covering power of paints

    4. Flow of particles - bulk density

    5. Pa&kg of partictes (escape of gases)

    6. RheoIogical properties (yield value: spherical 25

    Fig. l_ hlultipoint vs. single-point B-E-T_

    It is essential that the thermal history be

    known or proper bake-out conditions be

    utilized to prepare the sample for adsorption

    if the surface area data are to be meaningful.

    Before discussing multipoint static and

    single point dynamic B-E-T_ data, the two

    methods should be compared. In our labora-

    tory both instruments are employed, static

    and dynamic, and Fig. 1 shows a correlation

    plot involving a variety of samples (A120a,

  • 7/24/2019 Powder Technology Volume 18 Issue 1 1977 [Doi 10.1016%2F0032-5910%2877%2985006-7] E.S. Palik -- Specific

    3/4

    TiO,, 5X0,). The correlation coefficient for

    the dozen or so analyses involved is 0.99. The

    range of surface areas is 0.6 - 270 m/g_ With

    such a correlation, it is possible to utilize the

    one-point continuous flow method for nearly

    all of the samples and thereby save consider-

    able analysis time.

    An in-house standard surface area sample

    is used in our Iaboratory, consisting of a well-

    characterized titanium dioside powder.

    Table 3 summarizes some of our TiOs surface

    area data.

    The main thrust of this paper will be to

    present data from a round robin carried on

    by ASTlM subcommittee C21.07. In this work,

    eight different Iaboratories participated, and

    a variety of commercial instruments were

    TABLE 3

    Static us. dynamic B.E.T. data for TiO2 standard

    Static

    Dynamic

    Xccepted value

    10.6 + 0.3 m2/g

    9.5 * 0.7 m2/g

    10.3 m*fg

    (mean value of 6 tabs)

    TABLE 1

    Sample: X120, (pretreated). B.E.T. round robin

    4

    employed (the round robin study is still in

    progress). It would be appropriate to present

    the first phase of the work at this time, which

    is summarized in Table 4. The mean and

    standard deviation are identical for both single

    and multipoint data, 1.06 2 0.1 m*/g.

    It is evident after examining these data that

    once the sample has been pretreated (in the

    case of the alumina, pre-firing at 1000 C for

    -5 minutes to convert to the e-form), the

    specific surface area obtained is essentially

    independent of which laboratory performs

    the analysis on which instrument under which

    bake-out conditions, which adsorbate is used

    and whether single or multipoint data are

    used. In other words, surface area measurement

    is a straightforward determination, not subject

    to the usual types of errors encountered in

    physical measurements. All this is, of course,

    true thus far only for alumina powder which

    with nitrogen eshibits a high C value (>50).

    For a given sample, knowing the thermal

    history or controlling bake-out conditions

    and establishing the magnitude of the C value,

    a method can be developed to determine

    specific surface using any of the many avail-

    Laboratory

    Instrument Outgassing conditions Xdsorbate

    Surface area (mlg)

    Temp. (C) Time (h)

    Single Multipoint

    A b1*2100D 145 17 Kr 1.13

    150 17 Kr - 1.13

    1112300 150 0.67 N2 0.96. 1.03 -

    h12205 150 0.67 Xl- 0.97, 0.96 _

    B - 25 16 _

    1.15.1.13

    C Strohlein 150 1 N, 1.08, 1.07 -

    Shell-Sorpt** 200 2 N 2 1.18,1.1-l _

    bI*MIC-103 125 17 Nq - o.ss

    D Quantasorb*** 150 1 N2 1.03, 1.0-l 1.01, 1.05

    Monosorb*** 150 1 N

    1.05.

    1.04 -

    E hlonosorb 150 1 N2 l-OS, 1.10 -

    Monosorb 150 1

    N2 1.07,1.06

    -

    F hI*2100D 150 1 Kr _ 1.11

    M2100D 150 16 Kr - 1.0-l

    G Monosorb 150 1 N2 1.09, 1.11

    -

    1.05, 1 . 0 7

    Quantasorb 150 1 N2 1_01,1_03 1.00.1.02

    I-I Quantasorb 150 1

    N2 -

    1.05, l-02

    1.03

    Mean and std. dev. = 1.06 * 0.1

    *Micromeritica In&r. Corp.

    **Perkin-Elmer

    ***Quantachrome Corp.

  • 7/24/2019 Powder Technology Volume 18 Issue 1 1977 [Doi 10.1016%2F0032-5910%2877%2985006-7] E.S. Palik -- Specific

    4/4

    48

    able instruments found today that will yield

    reproducible and comparable values.

    The above round robin study is being es-

    tended to silica and other ultra-fine forms of

    alumina powders and will be reported at a

    later date.

    It is concluded from this work that for

    samples having a known thermal history, a

    high C value, and a surface area >0_5 m*/g,

    one can use N, single-point adsorption_ For

    low surface areas (


Recommended