POWER LINE TRAIL CONNECTOR - Montgomery … · Skippack Township to the Pennypack Trail and Cross...

POWER LINE TRAIL CONNECTOR

FEASIBILITY STUDY

DRAFT REPORTDecember 2013

MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA

PREPARED BY:

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORSRobert J. BirchCandyce Fluehr ChimeraMichael J. Fox Jeffrey W. McDonnellJoseph P. Walsh

ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEEVere Archibald Barry Baker Jeffrey GibbonsJeanine HurryMahbubur R. MeenarBeth StaabTerry Wilson

OPEN SPACE COMMITTEEKim GreeneJay GlickmanLaurence PoliRoy RodriguezBeth Staab

PLANNING COMMISSIONMichael BeattyJay GlickmanSteve KrumenackerLeon McGuireJames RallEllen ReynoldsJonathan Trump

PARK& RECREATION BOARDMark AngeloneLinda BrooksAngelo GrassoKim GreeneMichael OkinoAl QuastiAnthony Ruggieri

This project funded through the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission’s (DVRPC’s) Regional Trails Program.

PAGE2

PAGE3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

POWER LINE TRAIL CONNECTOR FEASIBILITY STUDY

INTRODUCTION -PROJECT SCOPE -REGIONAL CONTEXT -PROJECTED USE -TRAIL CHARACTERISTICS

INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS -PHYSICAL CONDITIONS -USAGE FEASIBILITY -LEGAL FEASIBILITY

METHODOLOGY -EXISTING PLANS AND FIELD INVENTORY -PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -DESIGN CRITERIA

RECOMMENDATIONS -TRAIL ALIGNMENT -PROPOSED EASEMENTS -OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE -IMPLEMENTATION -OPINION OF PROBABLE COST -FUNDING -PERMITTING AND COORDINATION

APPENDIX -PHOTO REFERENCE SHEETS -MONTGOMERY COUNTY PRIMARY TRAIL NETWORK PLAN -PENNSYLVANIA BIKE ROUTE S PLAN

INTRODUCTION PROJECT SCOPE

REGIONAL CONTEXT

PAGE4


202 PARKWAY TRAIL SEGMENT WITH DEDICATED BIKE LAND AND SIDE TRAIL

The purpose of the Montgomery Township Power Line Connector Trail Feasibility Study is to evaluate routing options that will best connect the recently constructed Route 202 Parkway Trail to the partially constructed Power Line Trail. Both of these trails are identified on Montgomery County’s proposed primary trail network plan, which was prepared by the Montgomery County Planning Commission. Feasibility criteria include pedestrian safety, physical barriers, financial consideration, connectivity to residential populations and to existing and proposed amenities within Montgomery Township as well as surrounding municipalities.

Montgomery Township is situated on the eastern edge of Montgomery County, bordered by Horsham Township, Lower Gwynedd Township, Upper Gwynedd Township, Lansdale Borough, Hatfield Township and New Britain Township, Bucks County to the East. The Township is densely populated and composed of a large range of residential and non-residential uses. In addition to the multitude of existing sidewalk networks existing throughout the Township, several existing and planned regional trail routes

also exist. The Route 202 Parkway trail is a nine (9) mile multi-use trail that runs from Doylestown to Montgomeryville. The other significant trail network that is proposed within the Township is the Power Line Trail. This proposed seventeen (17) mile trail will extend from Evansburg State Park in Skippack Township to the Pennypack Trail and Cross County Trail in Upper Moreland Township. The Trail follows a PECO utility corridor. Approximately five (5) miles of the trail has been constructed in adjacent Horsham Township.

In addition to these regional, off road trails, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s Bicycle PA Bike Route S utilizes portions of Route 309, Hartman Road, Horsham Road and Kenas Road within Montgomery Township. This on-

INTRODUCTION

PAGE5

PROJECTED USE


PROJECTED USE

BICYCLE PA ROUTES

road bike route extends four hundred sixteen miles in length, beginning at the West Virginia state line just west of West Alexander and extending east to the New Jersey state line in Washington Crossing. Although the Bicycle PA routes do not necessarily provide specific bicycle facilities, they are intended to provide experienced bicyclists with a guide to available highways and rail trails to traverse across the state.

Montgomery Township anticipates the Power Line Connector Trail to be a Multi-Use trail, utilized by bicyclists and pedestrians for transportation and exercise. The proposed Trail system will provide a multitude of recreational opportunities for the Township and Surrounding Communities by linking residents to regional trail networks. These trail networks provide access to various parks, open space, commercial areas and cultural/historical sites. Implementation of the trails will also open up opportunities for enhancement of natural areas.

TRAIL CHARACTERISTICS

INTRODUCTION

PAGE6

TYPICAL SEPARATED MULTI-USE TRAIL OFF ROAD

TYPICAL ON ROAD SHARED ROUTE


This feasibility study considers several types of trails to create the link between the Parkway Trail and the Power Line Trail. Multi-Use, or Shared Use trails

which are physically separated from vehicular traffic, as well as On-Road cycling routes are noted as potential routes.

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

� ��

��

4040404040

4141414141

4242424242

4343434343

4444444444

4545454545

4646464646

4747474747

4848484848

4949494949

4A4A4A4A4A

4B4B4B4B4B

4C4C4C4C4C

4D4D4D4D4D

4E4E4E4E4E

4F4F4F4F4F

5050505050

5151515151

5252525252

5353535353

5454545454

5555555555

5656565656

5757575757

5858585858

5959595959

5A5A5A5A5A

5B5B5B5B5B

5C5C5C5C5C

5D5D5D5D5D

5E5E5E5E5E

5F5F5F5F5F

6060606060

6161616161

6262626262

6464646464

6565656565

6666666666

6767676767

6868686868

6969696969

6A6A6A6A6A

6B6B6B6B6B

6D6D6D6D6D

6E6E6E6E6E

6F6F6F6F6F

7070707070

7171717171

7474747474

7575757575

7676767676

7777777777

7878787878

7979797979

D0D0D0D0D0

D1D1D1D1D1

D2D2D2D2D2

D3D3D3D3D3

D4D4D4D4D4

D5D5D5D5D5

D6D6D6D6D6

104104104104104

105105105105105

106106106106106

107107107107107

108108108108108

10A10A10A10A10A

D7D7D7D7D7

D8D8D8D8D8

D9D9D9D9D9

DADADADADA

DBDBDBDBDB

DDDDDDDDDD

DEDEDEDEDE

DFDFDFDFDF

E0E0E0E0E0

E1E1E1E1E1

E2E2E2E2E2

E3E3E3E3E3

E4E4E4E4E4

E5E5E5E5E5

E6E6E6E6E6

E7E7E7E7E7

E8E8E8E8E8

E9E9E9E9E9

EAEAEAEAEA

EBEBEBEBEB

ECECECECEC

EDEDEDEDED

EEEEEEEEEE

EFEFEFEFEF

F0F0F0F0F0

F1F1F1F1F1

F2F2F2F2F2

F3F3F3F3F3

F4F4F4F4F4

F5F5F5F5F5

F6F6F6F6F6

F7F7F7F7F7

F8F8F8F8F8

F9F9F9F9F9

FAFAFAFAFA

10B10B10B10B10B

10C10C10C10C10C

10D10D10D10D10D

10E10E10E10E10E

10F10F10F10F10F

110110110110110

112112112112112

113113113113113

114114114114114

116116116116116

117117117117117

118118118118118

11A11A11A11A11A

11B11B11B11B11B

11C11C11C11C11C 11F11F

11F11F11F

120120120120120

122122122122122

125125125125125

126126126126126

127127127127127

129129129129129

12B12B12B12B12B

12C12C12C12C12C

12E12E12E12E12E

12F12F12F12F12F

130130130130130

131131131131131

132132132132132

135135135135135

137137137137137

13D13E

13F13F13F13F13F

142142142142142

143143143143143

144144144144144

145145145145145 146146

146146146

147147147147147

148148148148148

14A14A14A14A14A

14C14C14C14C14C

14D14D14D14D14D

153153153153153

154154154154154

155155155155155

156156156156156

157157157157157

158158158158158

15D15D15D15D15D

15E15E15E15E15E

160160160160160

161161161161161

162162162162162

164164164164164

165165165165165

166166166166166 167167

167167167

168168168168168

169169169169169

16A16A16A16A16A16B16B

16B16B16B

16C16C16C16C16C

16D16D16D16D16D

16E16E16E16E16E

16F16F16F16F16F

1AC1AC1AC1AC1AC

1AD1AD1AD1AD1AD

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

� � ��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

19B19B19B19B19B

19C19C19C19C19C

19D19D19D19D19D

19E19E19E19E19E

19F19F19F19F19F

1A01A01A01A01A0

1A11A11A11A11A1

1A21A21A21A21A2

1A31A31A31A31A3 1A41A41A4

1A41A4

1A51A51A51A51A5

1A61A61A61A61A6

1A71A71A71A71A7

1A81A81A81A81A8

1A91A91A91A91A9

1AA1AA1AA1AA1AA

1AF1AF1AF1AF1AF

1BD1BD1BD1BD1BD

1BE1BE1BE1BE1BE

1BF1BF1BF1BF1BF

1C11C11C11C11C1

1C31C31C31C31C3

1C51C51C51C51C5

1C61C61C61C61C6

1C71C71C71C71C7

1C81C81C81C81C8

1C91C91C91C91C9

1CA1CA1CA1CA1CA

1CB1CB1CB1CB1CB

1CC1CC1CC1CC1CC

1CD1CD1CD1CD1CD

1CE1CE1CE1CE1CE

1D11D11D11D11D1

1D21D21D21D21D2

1D31D31D31D31D3

1D51D51D51D51D5

1D61D61D61D61D6

1D81D81D81D81D8

1D91D91D91D91D9

1DA1DA1DA1DA1DA

1DB1DB1DB1DB1DB

1DC1DC1DC1DC1DC

1DD1DD1DD1DD1DD

1DE1DE1DE1DE1DE

1DF1DF1DF1DF1DF

1E01E01E01E01E0

1E11E11E11E11E1

1E21E21E21E21E2

1E31E31E31E31E3

1E41E41E41E41E4

1E51E51E51E51E5

1E61E61E61E61E6

1E81E81E81E81E8

1EC1EC1EC1EC1EC

1ED1ED1ED1ED1ED

�� Neighborhoods

Streets

Features

Streams

Buildings

Parcels OverView

Zoning Layers

Zoning OverlaysBECPODHLIHLI II

ZoningBPCCAL1MHPR1R2R3R3AR3BR5R6RSS

Montgomery Twp

INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS

PAGE7

PHYSICAL CONDITIONS


Land Use The land that exists between the 202 Parkway Trail and the proposed connection to the Power Line Trail is primarily urbanized land with rolling topography. Land uses include a wide range of Industrial, Commercial and Mid-Density Residential.


PAGE8POWER LINE TRAIL CONNECTOR FEASIBILITY STUDY

Natural Areas and Parks Due to the highly urbanized and densely populated condition of the project area, there are limited Natural Areas. There is a vegetated corridor that follows the path of the Little Neshaminy Creek which flows through the project site as well as vegetated tributary areas. These tributary areas exhibit signs of the highly urbanized environment in which they are located, having eroded banks from high velocity flows.

There is a Township Park located within the project area. Whispering Pines Park is located at Orchard and Stump Roads.Notable Sites The area of the Connector Trail contains several notable sites that were influential in the recommended trail routing. The first site is The Joseph Ambler Inn property. Several historic structures

are located on this property, including a stone-bank barn which was constructed in 1820, a cottage built in 1929, The Thomas Wilson House and The John Roberts House. The land was originally owned by William Penn and was granted to Richard Pearce, who then sold a piece to William Morgan. Joseph Amber acquired the property after the death of William Morgan. This site is full of history and charm. Another important site in the project area is the Montgomery Township Municipal Complex. The Township complex is home to the Township’s Government, Administration and Police. There are existing trails and open space on this site as well. This complex has ample parking, and could serve as a trail head for the Connector Trail. Looking to the future, there is one more notable site within the Connector Trail project area. The approximately twelve (12) acre site is located on the south side of Horsham Road, to the east of Stump Road. This is the future home of the Montgomery Township Community Center. This will be a wonderful asset to the community, providing programs and amenities for residents of all ages. The facility will also have ample parking and could serve as a trail head for the Connector Trail.

LITTLE NESHAMINY CREEK



PAGE9

LEGAL FEASIBILITYUSAGE FEASIBILITY

Proposed Easements will be necessary to obtain from all properties not owned by Montgomery Township or within Township road rights-of-way, including PECO and PennDOT. The recommended routes, as described, utilize Township owned property where possible to limit the number of easements that would be necessary from private property owners. Trail construction and maintenance easements would need to be executed.

The Connector Trail connects into the existing network of sidewalks that reach into densely populated residential neighborhoods, providing the necessary hierarchy of access to the available regional trail systems and their associated amenities and resources. The proposed trail route avoids roadways with high volume vehicular traffic where possible to create a safe, inviting environment for trail users. In addition to the access provided to residential properties, it is also important to recognize the proximity to the many employees that work in the Commercial and Industrial sites within the project area. This creates opportunities for before-work, lunch break and after-work use of the trail system. Pedestrian commuting is also a potential benefit to employees living and working in close proximity to this trail network.


METHODOLOGY

PAGE10

EXISTING PLAN ANDFIELD INVENTORY

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

DESIGN CRITERIA

The Montgomery County Trail Plan which was prepared by the Montgomery County Planning Commission identifies the Power Line Trail and 202 Parkway Trail within the Township. This Feasibility Study was prepared utilizing aerial imagery flown in 2005, and obtained from the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC), as well as Geographical Information System (GIS) parcel data obtained from the Montgomery Township GIS database. Potential Trail Routes were walked and a photographic inventory of conditions was taken.

The Draft Plan and Routing Options were presented publicly at the Township’s Plan-ning Commission meeting in April 2013, the Park & Recreation meeting in June 2013, the Environmental Advisory Com-mittee meeting in September of 2013 and the Open Space Committee meeting in October of 2013. General consensus was reached to support the proposed trail routes.

There are several guidelines for the design of Multi-Use Trails, the most current of which are still in draft form as of the date of this report. The following chart provides a comparison between the most current recommendations as provided by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Board (Access Board) and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). These criteria were considered during the preparation of this feasibility study and shall also be utilized to guide the detailed design and engineering of the Connector Trail. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official’s (AASHTO) current guidelines for Shared Use Paths recommend a minimum width of ten (10) feet for a two-directional Shared Use Path. A graded, shoulder area of at least three (3) feet should also be provided. These guidelines also recommend a minimum lane width of fourteen (14) feet for Shared Lanes on roadways, in conjunction with proper signage and roadway markings.

POWER LINE TRAIL CONNECTOR FEASIBILITY STUDYPAGE

11

METHODOLOGY

Shared Use Trail Design GuidelinesTrail Type Required Width Agency/Guideline Signage MarkingsOff Road 10' minimum with 2'

clear shoulders having 6:1 max. slope (3) 5' clear shoulders shall be provided where there is an adjacent water hazard or down-ward slope of 3:1 or greater

American Association of State High-way and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Design of Shared Use Path (Feb. 2010) (DRAFT)

Part 9 of MUTCD Solid/Broken Retrore-flectorized Yellow line to clarify the direction of travel and organize pathway traffic

Off Road (Adjacent to Roadways) 10' minimum with a minimum of 5' clear to adjacent roadway

American Association of State High-way and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Design of Shared Use Path (Feb. 2010) (DRAFT)

Part 9 of MUTCD Solid/Broken Retrore-flectorized Yellow line to clarify the direction of travel and organize pathway traffic

On Road (Shared Lanes) Minimum of 14' lane width. (1)

American Association of State High-way and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Design of On-Road Facilities (Feb. 2010) (DRAFT)

W11-1 & W16-1P (Share the Road) R4-11 (Bicylces May Use Full Lane)

Bike Lane Symbol Mark-ing Placement imme-dately after an intersec-tion and at intervals not greater than 250 ft.

On Road (Bike Lanes) Minimum of 4' where no curb and gutter and there is no on-street parking Adjacent to On-Street Parking: 6' recommended (5' min.) 7' Adjacent to Nar-row Parking Lane with High Turnover 6-8' In Area of High Bicycle Use


R3-17 (Bike Lane) & R3-17aP/bP (Ahead/Ends) Spaced as needed, based on context

4" Solid White Line and Bike Lane Symbol Mark-ing spaced as needed, based on context

On Road (Paved Shoulder) 4' with no vertical obstructions adjacent 5' with vertical obstruc-tion adjacent




Path within a Public Right-Of-Way functioning as a sidewalk

Public Rights of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)

Shared Use Path in Independent Corridors

Architectural Barriers Act Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas (ADOGA)

(1) Less than 14' may be designated for bicycles with adequate sigange and markings(2) Shared Lane Marking not to be used on roadways having a speed limit greater than 35 mph(3) 8' width is allowable in rare cases/physical constraints


RECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE12

TRAIL ALIGNMENT

Multiple potential trail alignments were explored and evaluated through the process of determining the feasibility of the connector trail. The various trail options are described below.

Option A - Off-Road: (Route shown in RED on the overall trail feasibility diagram on Page 17 and shown in detail on Pages 18-20) Route A proposes to connect to the existing stub trail that currently connects to the 202 Parkway Trail at the western property edge of the Joseph Ambler Inn property. The trail follows along the northern property line of the Joseph Ambler Inn, heading east towards the Montgomery Township Municipal Complex. Easements will need to be secured to cross the Joseph Ambler Inn property. The trail would extend across the western property line of the Montgomery Township Municipal Complex into a wooded area. A stream crossing would be necessary to traverse over the Little Neshaminy Creek, which flows through the Township property and under Horsham Road. An alternate to this stream crossing would be a routing out to Horsham Road to utilize the existing road crossing. The negatives of this routing would be a less

scenic route and safety concerns utilizing the highly trafficed State roadway. The trail would then connect to the existing paved trails north of the parking area for the municipal complex. Safety improvements such as signage and striping would be needed to better identify the pedestrian crossing of the driveway which provides access to the municipal complex from Stump Road. The trail would then follow the existing access drive and traverse along the eastern side of the municipal building and meet the intersection of Horsham and Stump Roads. Gated access and fencing is recommended to secure the access area and storage tanks. Pedestrian crossing buttons exist at the intersection of Horsham and Stump roads. These signals and curb ramps should be closely evaluated to ensure they are fully compliant with Penn-DOT requirements since they fall within Horsham Road’s right-of-way, which is a State road. Continental crosswalk striping should be implemented to create better vehicular awareness of the pedestrian crossings. The trail would then continue east along Horsham Road and follow the vacated road parcel which is located between two storm-water management facilities, the eastern facility


RECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE13

being located on the site of the future Montgomery Township Community Center. Routing the trail though the Community Center site is a great opportunity to connect to a major Community Amenity. The trail would continue east, along the southern property line, following the existing tree line. The trail then crosses over several properties where easements would need to be obtained. The first is the Cedar Run Landscapes property. There are existing storage areas and bulk mulch bins located in the area where the trail is proposed. Once past the Cedar Run property, the trail accesses the property of TEVA Pharmaceuticals. The TEVA facility is completely enclosed by an eight (8) foot high chain link fence. There is lawn and landscape area between the property line and the chain link fence that would be ample to support the ten (10) foot wide trail. Following the perimeter of the TEVA property, the trail crosses over to the parcel to the south of TEVA, the Hartman Corporate Center property. Again, ample area exists between the parking area for the Hartman Corporate Center and the TEVA fence line. This route provides a continuous trail which is not impeded by a significant number of roadway or driveway

crossings. The trail continues between the TEVA and Hartman Corporate Center properties until it reaches Hartman Road. The trail then advances across the entrance drive to the Harman Corporate Center and continues south along Hartman Road. A five (5) foot wide concrete sidewalk exists along portions of this stretch of the proposed trail. There are also several obstacles to traverse along this stretch, including existing culvert crossing head walls, wet areas, utility poles and slopes. The trail will intersect with the PECO power line corridor which is the future location of the Power Line Trail, heading towards Horsham Township to the east. A mid-block crossing will be needed to cross Hartman Road at this location. Preliminary discussions with property owners along this Route, particularly in the vicinity of the TEVA parcels, which indicated that this route would likely not be a viable option due to security concerns as well as potential future development. Therefore, an alternate route is also shown on the plan, which would basically become a side trail along Horsham and Hartman Roads. There are existing concrete sidewalks which could be widened or replaced to accomodate the multi-use trail


RECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE14

width that is required. This option appears to be viable with the drawback of the proximity to the high volumes of vehicular traffic along Horsham Road.

Option B - On-Road (Shown in ORANGE on the overall trail feasibility diagram located on Page 17 and shown in detail on Pages 21-23) Route Option B traverses through the industrial complex. This route proposes to separate the walkers from the cyclists. Evaluating this route identified approximately twenty (20) access driveways would need to be crossed in order to move through the campus. These crossings would create dangerous conditions for cyclists, in particular. The proposed routing utilizes the existing thirty (30) foot wide paved cart way as an on-road shared roadway. In addition to the shared roadway for cyclists, a five (5) foot wide walkway would be located on the south side of Commerce Drive. The walkway would be continued along the east side of Stump Road to fill in the sidewalk gap that exists in that area, which connects to an existing mid-block crossing, connecting to The Village Shopping Center. Once on the west side of Stump Road, this also creates a link to Whispering Pines Park, which has

a tot lot, basketball court, street hockey court and opens lawn. Signage, street markings and bicycle safe storm drain grates are needed to properly mark the shared roadway. The walkway continues along the western side of Commerce Drive to eliminate the need for a crossing at Domorah Drive, along Hartman Road, in order to connect with the Power Line Trail. A culvert extension would be necessary where a piped tributary currently exists. At the intersection of Domorah Drive and Hartman Road, the ten (10) foot wide multi-use trail would head south on the western side of Hartman Road and connect to the future Power Line Trail system by way of a mid-block crossing with a pedestrian refuge island in Hartman Road. The intersection of the Township’s Connector Trail and Power Line trail would have a kiosk containing information and maps of the various trail systems for users to utilize to determine their desired route and identify amenities and destinations along the trails. An alternative to the continuation of the route as described above is to divert the trail through the secondary PECO power line corridor prior to Domorah Drive. The difficulty with this routing option is the ability to safely navigate through the Public Works area to connect with the primary


RECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE15

PECO power line corridor. Significant changes to the parking and vehicle access would need to take place to accommodate a safe pedestrian route through this area.

Option C: (Route shown in BLUE on the overall trail feasibility diagram on Page 17)This route explores the use of an existing privately owned open space/utility easement adjacent to The Terrace at Montgomery residential development. This area is to the east side of the development, following the existing Little Neshaminy Creek stream corridor. This corridor, at first blush, appears to be a promising opportunity due to the fairly flat terrain and lack of mature trees and vegetation. This route would also need to traverse some steep slopes, cross the Little Neshaminy Creek, provide a mid-block crossing of Stump Road and navigate through an existing auto dealership property. Evaluating the overall feasibility and value to the Township and its residents, we do not feel this route provides the most value

for several reasons:1. Duplicate Routing. Option A routing would provide convenient trail access to the Terrace at Montgomery residents, however they currently have access to the 202 Parkway trail that runs parallel , just to the west. An existing sidewalk network and crosswalks provide convenient, safe access to the 202 Parkway Trail where it intersects with Stump Road.2. Bypass Notable Township Sites. Routing Option A would parallel the 202 Parkway and Route 309 corridors, rather than connect to the Township’s historic and cultural resources, including the Joseph Ambler Inn, Montgomery Township Municipal Complex and future Community Center.3. Financial Consideration. Trail Routing Option A does not allow for utilization of existing infrastructure and Township owned properties. This will increase the cost and complexity of acquiring easements and constructing the necessary infrastructure to support trail implementation.


RECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE16

PROPOSED EASEMENTS

Proposed Easements will be necessary to obtain from all properties not owned by Montgomery Township or within Township road rights-of-way, including PECO and PennDOT. The recommended routes as described utilize Township owned property where possible to limit the number

of easements that would be necessary from private property owners. Anticipated easements will be necessary from the following property owners/parcels:

List of Potential Easements Needed to Facilitate Connector Trail (On-Road Route)

Parcel Block and Unit # Owner Name Approximate Easement Area Required

Block 15, Unit 10 N/L Joseph Inn Real Estate 13,125 s.f.*Block 18A, Unit 9 N/L Lloyd, William P 4,800 s.f.**Block 18, Unit 63 N/L PECO 3,100 s.f.**Block 18, Unit 62 N/L Ambrose, Francis J. & Freida 3,500 s.f.**Block 18, Unit 61 N/L Lansdale Realty Assoc. 2,650 s.f.**Block 18, Unit 60 N/L Vink & Beri LLC 2,150 s.f.**

Block 18, Unit 59 N/L RMS Development Company, LP

7,700 s.f.**

*Based on a 15’ wide easement across the length of the property.** Based on a 10’ wide easement across the length of the property.

PREFERRED ROUTE

VEHICULAR TRAVEL

PLAYGROUNDS

RECREATIONAL TRAIL

OBSERVATION AREAS

RAIN GARDENS

MEADOW/LAWN AREAS

WETLAND AREAS

INFORMATIONAL KIOSKS

LEGEND

FUTURE COMMUNITY

CENTER

JOSEPH AMBLER

INN

MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BUILDING

LEGEND

ROUTE OPTION A (OFF ROAD ROUTE)

ROUTE OPTION B (ON ROAD ROUTE)

ROUTE OPTION C (UTILITY EASEMENT)

FUTURE POWER LINE TRAIL (TO HORSHAM)

EXISTING 202 PARKWAY TRAIL

SEWER EASEMENT

SECONDARY PECO CORRIDOR THROUGH MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP

PUBLIC WORKS

SEWER EASEMENT

PARKWAY TRAIL COMMERCE DRIVE

HARTMAN CORPORATE CENTER ENTRANCE DRIVE

POWER LINE

1

2

3

4

5

6

6

5

4

1

2

3

PAGE17

HORSHAM ROAD

JOSEPH AMBLER INN MONTGOMERY

TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COMPLEX

STUMP RO

ADGEN

ERA

L H

AN

COCK

BLV

D

RED H

AVEN

DRI

VE

ORCHARD DRIVE

COMMERCE DRIVE

FUTURE COMMUNITY

CENTER

US

202

US

202

PARK

WAY

TRA

IL

VILLAGE OF NESHAMINY

FALLS

MONTGOMERY GREENE

LOCATION REFERENCE PLANSCALE: 1”=1500’

HA

RTM

AN

RO

AD

US

202

STU

MP

ROA

D

RT 309

HORSHAM ROAD 463

EASEMENT NEEDED

CONNECTION TO EXISTING 202 PARKWAY TRAIL STUB

DEVON CT.

JOSHUA CT.

THE TERRACE AT MONTGOMERY

THE ORCHARDSAMY CT.

PROPOSED SIDEWALK CONNECTION

EXISTING CROSSING TO THE VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER

i

i

i

i

i

1.

PAINTED CROSS WALK

LEGEND

EXISTING PAVED TRAIL

SHARE THE ROAD BIKE ROUTE

PROPOSED SIDEWALK/PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION

EXISTING CROSS WALK

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE

EXISTING MULTI-USE TRAIL

EXISTING SIDEWALK

EASEMENT NEEDED

PHOTO REFERENCE

KIOSK/INFORMATIONi

PROPOSED MULTI-USE TRAIL (OFF ROAD ROUTE)

1.

2. 3. 4. 5.

6.

7.

8.

10.

9.

11.

12.

PAGE18

SECONDARY PECO P

OWER LIN

E CORRIDORTEVA

PHARMACEUTICALS

CEDAR RUN LAND-

SCAPES

HARTMAN CORPORATE

CENTER

i

i

MONTGOMERY CROSSING

ALT

ERN

ATE

ROU

TE

ALTERNATE ROUTEALTERNATE ROUTE

ROUTE NOT FEASIBLE:POTENTIAL FUTURE EXPANSION

HORSHAM ROAD

HA

RTM

AN

RO

AD

COM

MER

CE D

RIV

E

CORPORATE DRIVE


HA

RTM

AN

RO

AD

US

202

STU

MP

ROA

D

RT 309

HORSHAM ROAD 463

13.

14.

33.

35.

34.

15. 16.

17.

18.

1.

PAINTED CROSS WALK

LEGEND




EXISTING CROSS WALK

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE


EXISTING SIDEWALK

EASEMENT NEEDED

PHOTO REFERENCE

KIOSK/INFORMATIONi


PAGE19


1.

PAINTED CROSS WALK

LEGEND




EXISTING CROSS WALK

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE


EXISTING SIDEWALK

EASEMENT NEEDED

PHOTO REFERENCE

KIOSK/INFORMATIONi


MONTGOMERY OAKS

PRIMARY PECO POWER LINE CORRIDOR

SECONDARY PECO P

OWER LI

NE CORRID

OR

i

DOMORAH DRIVE

COM

MER

CE D

RIV

E

REG

ENCY

DRI

VE

DRAKE LANE

CORP

ORA

TE D

RIV

E

HA

RTM

AN

RO

AD

US

202

STU

MP

ROA

D

RT 309

HORSHAM ROAD 463

FUTURE POWER LINE TRAIL

TO HORSHAM

HA

RTM

AN

RO

AD

22.

21.

23.

19.

24.

20.

PAGE20

HORSHAM ROAD

JOSEPH AMBLER INN

STU

MP

ROA

D

FUTURE COMMUNITY

CENTER

RED

HAV

EN D

RIV

E

ORC

HA

RD D

RIV

E


HA

RTM

AN

RO

AD

US

202

STU

MP

ROA

D

RT 309

HORSHAM ROAD 463

MONTGOMERY GREENE

VILLAGE OF NESHAMINY

FALLS

THE VILLAGE SHOPPING

CENTER

MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP

MUNICIPAL COMPLEX

1.

2. 3. 4.5.

6.

7.

8.

10.

9.

11.

25.

26.

EASEMENT NEEDED

ALT

ERN

ATE

ROU

TE

ALTERNATE ROUTE

CONNECTION TO EXISTING TRAIL STUB

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OVER LITTLE NESHAMINY

EXTEND SIDEWALK TO CREATE LINK TO SHOPPING CENTER

THE TERRACE AT MONTGOMERY

DEVON CT.

JOSHUA CT.

THE ORCHARDS

1.

PAINTED CROSS WALK

LEGEND




EXISTING CROSS WALK

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE


EXISTING SIDEWALK

EASEMENT NEEDED

PHOTO REFERENCE

KIOSK/INFORMATIONi

PROPOSED MULTI-USE TRAIL (ON ROAD ROUTE)

ALTERNATE TRAIL ROUTE

AMY CT.

i

i

i i

i

GEN

ERA

L H

AN

COCK

BLV

D

COMMERCE DRIVE

US

202

US

202

PARK

WAY

TRA

IL

PAGE21

SHARE THE ROAD ROUTE TO AVOID MULTIPLE DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS

COM

MER

CE D

RIV

E

ENTERPRISE ROAD

STU

MP

ROA

D

ORC

HA

RD D

RIV

EJO

NAT

HA

N D

RIV

E

CORP

ORA

TE D

RIV

E

HA

RTM

AN

RO

AD

US

202

STU

MP

ROA

D

RT 309

HORSHAM ROAD 463

28.

26.

27.

COMMERCE DRIVE


THE VILLAGE SHOPPING

CENTER

WHISPERING PINES PARK

SECONDARY PECO P

OWER LIN

E CORRIDOR

1.

PAINTED CROSS WALK

LEGEND




EXISTING CROSS WALK

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE


EXISTING SIDEWALK

EASEMENT NEEDED

PHOTO REFERENCE

KIOSK/INFORMATIONi



PAGE22

FUTURE POWER LINE TRAIL

TO HORSHAM

i

i

HA

RTM

AN

RO

AD

CORP

ORA

TE D

RIV

E

REG

ENCY

DRI

VE

DRAKE LANE


HA

RTM

AN

RO

AD

US

202

STU

MP

ROA

D

RT 309

HORSHAM ROAD 463

SECONDARY

PECO P

OWER

LINE C

ORRIDOR

PRIMARYPECO POWER LINE CORRIDORALTERNATE TRAIL ROUTE

COM

MER

CE D

RIV

E

DOMORAH DRIVE

PECO ELECTRICITY SUB-STATION

CULVERT EXTENSION TO ALLOW WALKWAY CONSTRUCTION

CROSSING NEEDED

29.

31.

32.

30.

24.

20.

19.

1.

PAINTED CROSS WALK

LEGEND




EXISTING CROSS WALK

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE


EXISTING SIDEWALK

EASEMENT NEEDED

PHOTO REFERENCE

KIOSK/INFORMATIONi



PAGE23


RECOMMENDATIONSOPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

PAGE24

The long-term success of the trail will rely on a regular maintenance schedule. This is important for the enjoyment of the trail user as well as the risk management of the Township, in its role as the trail operator. It is anticipated that the proposed trail route will be maintained by the Montgomery Township Public Works Department, in conjunction with the maintenance

performed at the Township Park facilities. The following list represents a generalized list of maintenance activities that may pertain to the Connector Trail. A detailed trail maintenance manual and schedule should be provided by the trail design consultant upon completion of detailed design drawings for the trail.

Trails Maintenance ChecklistActivity Description Frequency Notes

Mowing Maintain 4’ wide mow strip adja-cent to trail.

Monthly During Grow-ing Season

Use Flail-Type Mower

Pruning

Prune woody plant material to maintain 4’ clear adjacent to trail and provide 14’ vertical clearance.

Annual. Check trail after severe storms.

Treat & Remove inva-sive vines

Tree Removal Removal of hazard trees Annual. Check trail after severe storms.

Signage

Trail Surface Crack Seal/Resurfacing As needed Anticipated 15 year cycle

Drainage Structures Remove debris from inlets & swales Annual. Check trail after severe storms.

Litter Removal Trail-side litter pickup Monthly Encourage Carry In-Car-ry Out policy

Trash Collection Empty Trash Receptacles Weekly

Bridge InspectionInspection by Professional Engineer Every 2 years Inspection conducted

by Municipal Engineer

Graffiti Removal Painting/Graffiti Removal Annual/As Needed


RECOMMENDATIONSIMPLEMENTATION

PAGE25

OPINION OF PROBABLE COST

The total length of the proposed Connector Trail is approximately two (2) miles in length. Implementation is assumed to be completed in one phase. Depending upon the timing of construction of the Community Center, pieces of the trail could potentially be constructed in conjunction with that site work, independent of the remainder of the trail.

The total cost of the Connector Trail will potentially include easement acquisition costs, design costs and actual construction costs. Opinion of Probable Construction Costs have been prepared for both the Off-Road Option (Option A) and the On-Road (Option B) as described in this study. See charts on following page.

G GILMORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.&A ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTCLIENT:MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIPPROJECT NAME:POWERLINE CONNECTOR TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY - OPTION A (OFF ROAD)PROJECT NUMBER: DATE:2013-03011

UNIT# DESCRIPTION UNITS QTY PRICE AMOUNT

1 Easement Acquisition SF 16,500 1.60$ 26,400.00$ 2 Mobilization LS 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 3 E & S: 18" Silt Fence LF 16,800 1.50$ 25,200.00$ 4 Clear/Grub SY 1,750 3.00$ 5,250.00$ 5 Remove Concrete Sidewalk (4" Thick) SF 3,800 35.18$ 133,684.00$ 6 Drainage Improvements/SWM LS 1 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 7 Grading LS 1 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 8 Seeding/Mulching SY 5,600 0.20$ 1,120.00$ 9 Landscaping LS 1 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$

10 Pedestrian Bridge (12' Width, 80' Span) LS 1 200,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 11 Bypass Pumping for Bridge Installation LS 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 12 3" 19mm Superpave Wearing Course SY 9,500 16.50$ 156,750.00$ 13 6" Aggregate Subbase SY 9,500 10.00$ 95,000.00$ 14 PennDOT/ADA Compliant Curb Ramp EA 14 4,500.00$ 63,000.00$ 15 Pedestrian Refuge Island EA 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 16 Pedestrian Scale Stop Sign EA 18 150.00$ 2,700.00$ 17 Wayfinding Signage EA 15 150.00$ 2,250.00$ 18 Wayfinding/Information Kiosk EA 4 15,000.00$ 60,000.00$ 19 Split Rail Fencing LF 250 75.00$ 18,750.00$ 20 6' High Privacy Fencing LF 500 120.00$ 60,000.00$

21 Double Sided Guard Rail (Hartman Road Separation)

LF 2,750 120.00$ 330,000.00$

22 Segmental Block Retaining Wall SF 150 55.00$ 8,250.00$ 23 Line Striping LF 8,400 3.00$ 25,200.00$ 24 Painted Crosswalk (24") LF 620 100.00$ 62,000.00$ 25 Pedestrian Warning Signal EA 1 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 26 Pedestrian Warning Signage EA 4 200.00$ 800.00$

Subtotal: 1,466,354.00$ 15% Contingency: 219,953.10$

15% Design/Engineering: 219,953.10$

Total Estimated Construction Cost: 1,906,260.20$

20-Nov-13


RECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE26

G GILMORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.&A ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTCLIENT: MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIPPROJECT NAME:POWERLINE CONNECTOR TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY - OPTION B (ON ROAD)PROJECT NUMBER: DATE:2013-03011

UNIT# DESCRIPTION UNITS QTY PRICE AMOUNT

1 Easement Acquisition SF 37,205 1.60$ 59,528.00$ 2 Mobilization LS 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 3 E & S: Silt Fence 18" LF 17,600 1.50$ 26,400.00$ 4 Clear/Grub SY 1,750 3.00$ 5,250.00$ 5 Remove Concrete Sidewalk (4" Thick) SF 1,500 35.18$ 52,770.00$ 6 Grading LS 1 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 7 Drainage Improvements/SWM LS 1 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 8 Seeding/Mulching SY 6,000 0.20$ 1,200.00$ 9 Landscaping LS 1 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$

10 Pedestrian Bridge (10' Width, 80' Span) LS 1 200,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 11 Bypass Pumping for Bridge Installation LS 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 12 3" 19mm Superpave Wearing Course SY 3,500 16.50$ 57,750.00$ 13 6" Aggregate Subbase SY 3,500 10.00$ 35,000.00$ 14 PennDOT/ADA Compliant Curb Ramp EA 14 4,500.00$ 63,000.00$ 15 Concrete Pavement SY 3,150 27.00$ 85,050.00$ 16 Pedestrian Refuge Island EA 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 17 Pedestrian Scale Stop Sign EA 18 150.00$ 2,700.00$ 18 Wayfinding Signage EA 15 150.00$ 2,250.00$ 19 Wayfinding/Information Kiosk EA 4 15,000.00$ 60,000.00$

20 Double Sided Guardrail (Hartman Road Separation)

LF 550 $ 120.00 $ 66,000.00

21 6' Privacy Fencing LF 500 125.00$ 62,500.00$ 22 Line Striping LF 3,150 3.00$ 9,450.00$ 23 Painted Crosswalk (24") LF 1,160 100.00$ 116,000.00$ 24 Thermoplastic Sharrow Marking EA 40 300.00$ 12,000.00$ 25 Bicycle Safe Inlet Grates EA 10 750.00$ 7,500.00$ 26 Share the Road Signs EA 40 150.00$ 6,000.00$ 27 Pedestrian Warning Signal EA 1 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 28 Pedestrian Warning Signage EA 4 200.00$ 800.00$

Subtotal: 1,121,148.00$ 15% Contingency: 168,172.20$

15% Design/Engineering: 168,172.20$

Total Estimated Construction Cost: 1,457,492.40$

20-Nov-13


RECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE27


RECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE28

FUNDING

Trail development continues to be a high priority for grantors. It is recommended to discuss the project with Regional Advisors from each potential funding source to have the best opportunity to secure funds for implementation. The following represents a comprehensive list of current potential grant sources specifically for regional trail projects:

Montgomery County Open Space FundsMontgomery County has a history of supporting trail development throughout the County, dedicating over $2.8 million through 2016. Although most of this funding has already been allocated, the County’s commitment to regional trails indicates that future funding may become available. Due to the connectivity of the proposed connector trail to the 202 Parkway Trail and the Power Line Trail, there may also be opportunities for multi-municipal partnerships. http://www.montcopa.org/

Act 13: Marcellus Shale Impact FeesAct 13/Impact Fee provides for the imposition of an unconventional gas well fee (also called an impact fee), and the distribution of those funds to local and state governments. Act 13/Impact Fee also contains provisions regarding how the impact fee may be spent. A significant portion of the funds collected will be distributed directly to local governments to cover the local impacts of drilling. Also, several state agencies will receive funding to be used for a variety of other purposes. More information can be found at:http://www.puc.state.pa.us/filing_resources/issues_laws_regulations/act_13_impact_fee_.aspx

DVRPC Regional Trails ProgramThis program, administered by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, with funding from the William Penn Foundation, aims to capitalize upon opportunities for trail development by providing funding for targeted, priority trail design, construction and planning projects that will promote a truly connected, regional network of multi-use trails with Philadelphia and Camden as its hub. The program will also provide technical assistance to trail developers, counties, municipalities and nonprofit organizations. Although funding is currently depleted, additional funding may be added due to the success of the program. More information can be found at:http://www.dvrpc.org/RegionalTrailsProgram/


RECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE29

PA DCNR Bureau of Recreation and ConservationOne of the priorities for these grants are regionally significant trail development in the state. Grant applications are slated to open January 15, 2014 and are due April 16, 2014.The grants typically require an 80-20 or 50-50 match. More information can be found at: http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/brc/grants/c2p2programguidance/index.htm

PA DCED Greenways, Trails and Recreation Grant ProgramFunding for projects which involve development, rehabilitation and improvements to public parks, recreation areas, greenways, trails and river conservation. Grants shall be awarded to eligible applicants for projects that do not exceed $250,000. Most projects require a 50% local match of the total project cost. Applications from municipalities with a population of fewer than 5,000 require a 20% match of the total project cost. Match may be cash or non-cash and must be directly related to the approved scope of work. More information can be fount at: http://www.newpa.com/find-and-apply-for-funding/funding-and-program-finder/greenways-trails-and-recreation-program-gtrp

MAP-21 Under MAP-21, programs continue for active transportation programs including Transportation Enhancements, Safe Routes to School and Recreational Trails programs. More information can be found at: http://www.fta.dot.gov/map21/

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)Transportation Alternatives (TA) are Federal highway and transit funds set-aside under the Surface Transportation Program (STP) for community-based “non-traditional” projects designed to strengthen the cultural, aesthetic, and environmental aspects of the nation’s inter-modal transportation system. The TE funding category, which has historically funded many pedestrian and bicycle supportive projects such as streetscape improvements, was originally established by Congress in 1991 under the IS-TEA transportation authorization legislation, and was most recently affirmed as TA under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). The next selection cycle for the PA Transportation Alternatives Projects may occur in FY2014. More information can be found at:http://www.dvrpc.org/TA/


RECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE30

Recreational Trails ProgramMAP-21 authorized funding for the Recreational Trails Program (RTP) as a setaside of the new Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) (23 U.S.C. 213). The RTP funding is the same as the FY 2009 amount (unless the State opts out; see below): whatever a State received for the RTP in FY 2009 (as revised) will be the RTP amount. This will be up to $84.16 million nationwide, annually, for FY 2013 and 2014. More information can be found at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/recreational_trails/overview/map21.cfm

Safe Routes To SchoolMAP-21 establishes a new program to provide for a variety of alternative transportation projects that were previously eligible activities under separately funded programs. This program is funded at a level equal to two percent of the total of all MAP-21 authorized Federal-aid highway and highway research funds, with the amount for each State set aside from the State’s formula apportionments. Unless a State opts out, it must use a specified portion of its TA funds for recreational trails projects. Safe Routes to Schools Program is an eligible activity under this program. More information can be found at: http://www.dot.state.pa.us/Internet/Bureaus/CPDM.nsf/SRTSHomepage

PECO Green Region GrantsThe aim of these grants is to assist communities in their efforts to acquire and improve open lands. Green Region grants are available to municipalities in amounts up to $10,000. The grants can be used with other funding sources to cover a wide variety of planning and direct expenses associated with developing and implementing open space programs, including consulting fees, surveys, environmental assessments, habitat improvement, and capital improvements for passive recreation More information can be found at:https://www.peco.com/Community/CharitableGiving/GreenRegion/Pages/GrantDetails.aspx and the Green Region Program Administrator, Holly Harper (610)353-5587.


PERMITTING AND COORDINATIONRECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE31

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (Penn-DOT) will require permitting for all trail construction which occurs within a State owned road rights-of-way. State owned roads within our project area include: 1) S.R. 0463 (Horsham Road) 2) Hartman Road

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) will require: 1) Permitting for pedestrian bridge stream crossings. It is likely the General Permit Seven (GP-7) will be required for a Minor Road Crossing. 2) National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit will be required for construction disturbance greater than one (1) acre in size. This permit is coordinated through the Montgomery County Conservation District in conjunction with the Erosion and Sedimentation Control permitting that is required.

Montgomery County Conservation District will require: 1) Permitting for Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures

Montgomery Township will require: 1) Grading Permit and review of proposed storm-water management design by the Township Engineer. 2) Approval of plans and specifications by the Board of Supervisors in order to authorize the solicitation of bids for construction.

APPENDIX

PHOTO REFERENCES:1- 202 PARKWAY STUB

2- SWALE AT JOSEPH AMBLER INN

3- PARKING AT JOSEPH AMBLER INN

4- WOODED AREA AT JOSEPH AMBLER INN

5- POTENTIAL STREAM CROSSING LOCATION

6- EXISTING TRAIL SYSTEM AT MUNICIPAL COMPLEX

7- EXISTING MUNICIPAL COMPLEX ENTRANCE DRIVE

8- EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE AT MUNICIPAL COMPLEX

9- EAST SIDE OF MUNICIPAL COMPLEX

10- CORNER OF HORSHAM & STUMP ROADS

11- EXISTING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WEST OF FUTURE

COMMUNITY CENTER SITE

12- SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF FUTURE COMMUNITY CENTER SITE

13- SOUTHERN SIDE OF CEDAR RUN LANDSCAPE PARCEL

14- SOUTHERN SIDE OF TEVA PARCEL

15- LAWN STRIP BETWEEN TEVA & HARTMAN CORPORATE CENTER

16- HARTMAN CORPORATE CENTER ENTRANCE DRIVE

17- HORSHAM ROAD AT POWER LINE LOOKING EAST

18- EXISTING WALKWAY ALONG HARTMAN ROAD

19-HARTMAN ROAD AND DOMORAH DRIVE

20- HARTMAN ROAD - SOUTH OF DOMORAH DRIVE

21- HARTMAN ROAD - ADJACENT WET AREA

22- HARTMAN ROAD - HEAD WALL

23- HARTMAN ROAD - UTILITY POLE AND SLOPE

24- LINK TO FUTURE POWER LINE TRAIL

25- STUMP ROAD AND COMMERCE DRIVE

26- MISSING SIDEWALK CONNECTION TO COMMERCE DRIVE

27- CROSSING TO VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER

28- COMMERCE DRIVE

29- DOMORAH DRIVE - EXISTING GRATE

30- COMMERCE DRIVE AND DOMORAH CONNECTION

31- PECO CORRIDOR

32- PECO CORRIDOR AND PUBLIC WORKS

33- EXISTING WALK ALONG HORSHAM ROAD AT TEVA

34- EXISTING WALK ADJACENT TO WETLANDS

35- EXISTING WALK ALONG HARTMAN ROAD AT TEVA

202 PARKWAY STUB1.

PARKING AT JOSEPH AMBLER INN3.

SWALE AT JOSEPH AMBLER INN2.

WOODED AREA AT JOSEPH AMBLER INN 4.

POTENTIAL STREAM CROSSING LOCATION 5.

EXISTING MUNICIPAL COMPLEX ENTRANCE DRIVE

7.

EXISTING TRAIL SYSTEM AT MUNICIPAL COMPLEX

6.

EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE AT MUNICIPAL COMPLEX

8.

EAST SIDE OF MUNICIPAL COMPLEX9. CORNER OF HORSHAM & STUMP ROADS10.

SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF COMMUNITY CENTER SITE

12.EXISTING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WEST OF FUTURE COMMUNITY CENTER SITE

11.

SOUTHERN SIDE OF CEDAR RUN LANDSCAPE PARCEL 13.

LAWN STRIP BETWEEN TEVA & HARTMAN CORPORATE CENTER

15.

SOUTHERN SIDE OF TEVA PARCEL 14.

HARTMAN CORPORATE CENTER ENTRANCE DRIVE

16.

HORSHAM AT POWER LINE LOOKING EAST 17.

HARTMAN ROAD & DOMORAH DRIVE 19.

EXISTING WALK ALONG HARTMAN ROAD18.

HARTMAN ROAD - SOUTH OF DOMORAH DR.20.

HARTMAN ROAD - ADJACENT WET AREA21.

HARTMAN ROAD - UTILITY POLE & SLOPE 23.

HARTMAN ROAD - HEAD WALL 22.

LINK TO FUTURE POWER LINE TRAIL 24.

30' TYPICAL WIDTH

STUMP ROAD AND COMMERCE DRIVE25.

CROSSING TO VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER27.

MISSING SIDEWALK CONNECTION TO COMMERCE DRIVE

26.

COMMERCE DRIVE 28.

DOMORAH DRIVE - EXISTING GRATE 29.

PECO CORRIDOR31.

COMMERCE DRIVE AND DOMORAH DRIVE30.

PECO CORRIDOR AND PUBLIC WORKS 32.

EXISTING WALK ALONG HORSHAM ROAD AT TEVA

33.

EXISTING WALK ALONG HARTMAN ROAD AT TEVA

35.

EXISTING WALK ADJACENT TO WETLANDS34.

1. Chester Valley Trail2. Cresheim Trail3. Cross County Trail4. Evansburg Trail5. Liberty Bell Trail6. Manatawny Trail7. Pennypack Trail8. Perkiomen Trail

9. Power Line Trail10. Schuylkill East Trail11. Schuylkill River Trail12. Stony Creek Trail13. Sunrise Trail14. West County Trail15. Wissahickon Green Ribbon Trail16. 202 Trail

Completed TrailIn Design/Future ConstructionProposed TrailFreight StationCounty-Owned LandState-Owned LandValley Forge National Historical ParkHistoric Sites

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Primary Trail Network

Click on any red trail number/name or green park/historic site name for a link to individual websites.

See individual trail brochures for trailhead access to parking, public transit, restrooms, water, and other information.

0 1/2 1 2 Miles

MC

PC Montgomery

CountyPlanningCommissionMontgomery County Courthouse - Planning CommissionPO Box 311 Norristown PA 19404-0311(p) 610 278-3722 (f) 610 278-3941www.montcopa.org/plancom

RD

AVE

RD

BYBERRYDAV

ISVI

LLE

OLD

CR

EEK

TO

OK

AN

Y

PHIL

MO

NT

WELSH

PIK

E

RD

RD

OLD

YO

RK

TOWNSHIP LINE RD

RD

CHELTENHAM

LIMEKILN

RD

CHURCH

PIKE

AVE

YORK

HU

NTIN

GD

ON

EASTON

LINE

LIMEKILN

BETHLEHEM

BLA

IR M

ILL

RD

RD

PIKE

NORRISTOWN

BETHLEHEM

PIKE

RD

PIKE

BU

TLE

R

PIKE

PIK

E

DE

KA

LB

MORRIS

PIK

ED

EK

ALB

RD

WH

ITE

HA

LL

RDHORSHAMCOWPATH RD

AVENUE

LANCASTER

BELMONT AVE

CIT

Y L

INE

AV

E

RD

PLYMOUTH

CONSHO

HOCKEN RD

RIDGE PIKE

MONTGOMERY

RD

RIVER

SP

RIN

G M

ILL

RD

FA

YE

TT

E S

T

RD

SW

ED

E

ST

ST

4TH

MA

RK

LEY

ST

AIRY

SA

ND

Y H

ILL

RD

VA

LLE

Y

FORGE

DEK

ALB

PIK

E

RD

GULPH RD

VALLEY

AV

E

TOWNSHIP LINE RD

FO

RG

E

COUNTY

RD

RD

RD

FO

RT

Y

FO

OT

RO

AD

SKIPPACK R

IDG

E

SUMNEYTOWN

PIKE

RDBIG

ALLENTOWN

GERYVILLE

GRAVEL

KNIGHT RD

RD

RD

LAY

FIE

LD

RD

RD

HOFFMANSVILLE

KUTZTOWN

PIKE

BR

IDG

E

ST

PIKE

3RD

A

VE

MAIN

EGYPT RD

S T

RA

PP

E R

D

RO

AD

RIDGE PIKE

LEW

IS R

D

TO

WN

SH

IP

LI

NE

PIKE

SWAMP

KE

IM S

T

ST

RIDGE PIKE

CH

AR

LOT

TE

BIG

GRAVEL

PA

RK

RIDGE PIKE

PIKE

RD

PIK

E

AVENUE

HO

LLO

W

RD

GULPH RD

CONSHOHOCKEN

STATE

RD

PA

PE

R M

ILL

RD

MA

N

ATAW

NY ST

FARMING

TON AV

EH

AN

OVER

ST

ST ATE

ST

GIL

BE

RT

SV

ILLE

RD

LINFI

ELD R

D

CO

LL

EG

EV

ILL

E R

D

SECOND AVE

BLACK ROCK RD

BLACK RO

CK

RD

PAWLINGS RD

EGYPT RD

RD

STATE G

AME FARM R

OAD

HIGH ST MA

IN S

T

STUMP RD

GERMANTOWN PIKE

GERMANTOWN PIKE

SKIPPACK RD

SOUDERTON PIKE

WELSH

OLD

EA

ST

ON

RD

RD

MA

TSO

NS

F

OR

D

RD

SO

UD

ER

TO

N -

HA

RLE

YS

VIL

LE

PIK

E

MAIN ST

POTTSTOWN EXPRESSWAY

PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE NORTHEAST EXTENSION

PENN

SYLV

AN

IA

TURNPI

KE

MID

-CO

UN

TY

EX

PR

ESS

WAY

SCHUYLKILL

EXPRESSWAY

SCHUYLKILL EXPRESSWAY

FORT WASHING

TON E

XP

RESSWAY

RO

UTE 100 E

XP

RE

SS

WAY

100

422

73

663

73

29

29

563

113

63

73

463

611

63

332

263

232309

152

73

73

611

73

23320

23

363

113

422

202

N202

S202

202

202

I-476

I-276

I-276

I-476

I-76

30

1

I-76

422

29

63

63

152

63

Chester County

City ofPhiladelphia

DelawareCounty

Bucks CountyLehigh County

BerksCounty

UpperHanover

EastGreenville

RedHill

PennsburgSalford

UpperSalford

UpperFrederick

NewHanover

Douglass

Marlborough

LowerFrederick

GreenLane

WestPottsgrove

Limerick

UpperPottsgrove Lower

Pottsgrove

Schwenksville

Royersford

Pottstown

UpperGwynedd

Worcester

WestNorriton

EastNorriton

LowerSalford

Skippack

UpperProvidence

Perkiomen

Towamencin

LowerProvidence

CollegevilleTrappe

CheltenhamWhitpain

Springfield

Whitemarsh

LowerMerion

UpperMerion

Plymouth

Narberth

Conshohocken

WestConshohocken

Norristown

Bridgeport

Franconia

Hatfield

Ambler

Lansdale

TelfordSouderton

HatfieldBorough

BrynAthyn

Jenkintown

Rockledge

NorthWales

LowerMoreland

Abington

UpperMoreland

Horsham

Montgomery

UpperDublin

LowerGwynedd

Hatboro

6 11

14

10 8

84

14

8

13

4

9

11

1

11

3 15

5

15

5

12 5

3

169

2

3

7

VALLEY FORGE

NATIONALHISTORICAL

PARK

NorristownFarm Park

EvansburgState Park

FortWashingtonState Park

GreenLanePark

LowerPerkiomenValley Park

LorimerPark

CentralPerkiomenValley Park

UpperSchuylkill

Valley Park

7

11 Lock 60 at the Schuylkill Canal Park

PottsgroveManor

SunriseMill

PennypackerMills

John JamesAudubonCenter atMill Grove

Peter WentzFarmstead

MorganLog House

Evans-Mumbower

Mill

GraemePark

The Highlands

Hope Lodge

0 0.6 1 Mil" Scale 1 1 1

1:66,000 I I 0 0.6 1

Date post:	29-Jul-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	trannga
View:	218 times
Download:	0 times

POWER LINE TRAIL CONNECTOR - Montgomery … · Skippack Township to the Pennypack Trail and Cross...

Documents