+ All Categories
Home > Documents > POWER PULSE MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS...

POWER PULSE MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS...

Date post: 09-May-2018
Category:
Upload: dangdieu
View: 224 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
46
Power pulse measurement and analysis for a TRIGA reactor Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Jinamornphongs, Prachaks, 1938- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 18/06/2018 18:21:24 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/554575
Transcript

Power pulse measurement and analysis for a TRIGA reactor

Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic)

Authors Jinamornphongs, Prachaks, 1938-

Publisher The University of Arizona.

Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this materialis made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona.Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such aspublic display or performance) of protected items is prohibitedexcept with permission of the author.

Download date 18/06/2018 18:21:24

Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/554575

POWER PULSE MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS FOR A TRIGA REACTOR

byPrachaks Jinamornphongs

A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of theDEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree ofMASTER OF SCIENCE

In the Graduate CollegeTHE UNIVERSITY. OF ARIZONA

1 9 7 3

STATEMENT BY AUTHOR

This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of. the Libraryo

without special permission, provided that accurate acknowl­edgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this, manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the inter­ests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.

This thesis has been approved on the date shown below:

Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable

SIGNED:a

APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR

• As :learDate

Engineering

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author wishes to express his sincere apprecia­tion to his thesis director, Dr. Rocco A„ Fazzolare, for his guidance and assistance throughout this study f which has made this work possible.

To the courtesies extended to him by many individuals, especially Dr. David L. Hetrick and Dr. George W. Nelson, the author offers sincere thanks.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PageLIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vLIST OF TABLES . viAl3 SO? !R o o ' o e e e o o e o o o o o o o e e o ' e o o o 3-1CHAPTER

1. INTRODUCTION 120 . TEMPERATURE POWER CHARACTERISTIC . . . . . . . . 3

2.1 Zirconium Hydride Model . . . . . . . . . . 32.2 Temperature Coefficients . . . . . . . . . 4

2.2.1 Cell Effect . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.2.2 Doppler Effect . . . . . . . . . . . 52.2.3 Co r e L e akage . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2.3 Pulse Power Excursion Behavior . . . . . . 53. EXPERIMENTAL METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

3.1 Measurement System . . . . . . . . . . . . 113.2 Electronic Instruments . . . . . . . . . . 13

3.2.1 Uncompensated Ion Chamber . . . . . 133.2.2 Linear Current Amplifier . . . . . . 133.2.3 Voltage Controlled Oscillator . . . 143.2.4 .Multi-Channel Analyzer . . . . . . . 16

4. MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . 174.1 Pulse Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174.2 Data Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

5. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK . . . . . . . . . . . 245 . 1 n cl us ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o 245.2 Fu tur e Vfo rlc . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

APPENDIX A. VOLTAGE CONTROL OSCILLATOR . . . . . . . 28APPENDIX B. SYSTEM OPERATION AND CALIBRATION . . . . 34REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 37

iv

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Figure Page1. Power vs. time of a pulse power excursion

ehav io 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92. Measurement system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123. Block diagram of VCO circuit . . . . . . . . . . 154. Power vs. time at various reactivity

insertions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1825. Peak power (Mw) vs. (W . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

6. Fuel temperature as a function of time.. . . . . 26i\l. VCO circuit . . 0 . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . 2 9A2. Number of pulses vs. input voltage at

various gains for the VCO circuit . . . . . . . 30Bl. The connection diagram of the pulse

reactor power measurement system . . . . . . . 35

v

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page1. The measured parameters at various

reactivity insertions . 192„ Peak power, total energy release, and

half maximum power pulse width atvarious reactivity insertions 19

&3o w and at various reactivities . . « , » . . . 214. Experimentally determined parameters for

the TRIGA Mark I reactor . . 245. Parts list of the VCO circuit „ „ . „ „ «, . . . 33

vi

ABSTRACT

An electronic system to measure the TRIGA reactor power pulse excursion is described. A Voltage Controlled Oscillator was constructed and used with a multi-channel analyzer operated in multi-scaler mode for the measurement. The output voltage of the ion chamber amplifier is con­verted to a pulse rate, which varies proportionally to the reactor power.

Step reactivity insertion ranging from 1.2 to 1.85 dollars were used in these experiments. The pulse data were analyzed and the following reactor parameters were determined: '.

1. The reciprocal reactor period, W.2. The prompt neutron life time, j£/|3.3. The energy coefficient of feedback reactivity,

OCKTT°

vii

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

The TRIGA Mark I reactor (1) of the Nuclear Engineer­ing Department at The University of Arizona is used for training, research, and isotope production. The reactor has recently been refueled and modified with a new control system to permit both steady state and pulse mode operation. The maximum continuous power is now limited to 100 Kw and a reactivity insertion up to $2.00 is permitted in the pulsing mode.

The reactor core contains a solid, homogeneous uranium fuel and zirconium-hydride moderator (U-ZrH^ ^).This fuel-moderator element has an inherent property of a prompt negative temperature coefficient of reactivity. The negative reactivity feedback will increase when the fuel temperature is increased. Thus, the power will rise after a large reactivity step is introduced into the. core, and will then fall to a low level due to the large temperature co­efficient. This gives rise to a characteristic power pulse. The maximum power of the pulse and its duration depend on the magnitude of reactivity inserted, e.g., $1.2 of reactivity results in 18 Mw at maximum power with half maximum power width of 166.5 msec, $1.85 yields 319 Mw for

31 msec. The inherent safety of the TRIGA fuel is demon­strated by the Advance TRIGA Prototype Reactor (ATPR) with stainless steel clad fuel (U-ZrH^ ^ ) which has been pulsed with $7.00 worth of reactivity (2). A peak power of 27,900 Mw was reached with a total energy 115 Mw-sec releasedo The half maximum power width was 0.93 msec.

It is the object of this research to measure and analyze the pulse shape produced at The University of Arizona reactor. An analysis of this type, for various reactivity insertions, provides information related to the dynamic characteristics and behavior of this reactor system.

The power level during pulsing is shown as an analog signal on a linear power recorder of the control panel. An electronic system was put together to measufe the signal and convert it to digital information appropriate for a multi-channel analyzer and further computer analysis.After measurement, a computer program was used to obtain the reciprocal reactor period, W; prompt neutron life time, l/|3;and the energy coefficient of feedback reactivity, otK/p.©

In Chapter 2, a theoretical description of the pulsing behavior of TRIGA is presented. Chapter 3 discusses the experimental equipment and electronics used. Some sample measurements and analyses are shown in Chapter 4.

CHAPTER 2

TEMPERATURE POWER CHARACTERISTIC

2.1 Zirconium Hydride Model The structure of zirconium hydride consists of a

face-centered cubic lattice of zirconium atoms with inter­stitial hydrogen atoms forming a second cube half the size of the zirconium cube and centered inside that lattice (3). Each hydrogen atom is equidistant from the four nearest zirconium neighbors. Since it is bound isotropically, it acts like a harmonic oscillator in a potential well. This oscillator has discrete possible energy states given by

En = (n + 3/2) hV (1)

whereh = Planck's constant,

_ ? 7= 6.62x10 (erg-sec)__2v = the oscillator frequency (sec )

n = an integer.The characteristic energy, hv = 0.14 ev.

ZrH^ alone is quite ineffective in thermal!zing aneutron below 0.14 ev. For neutrons of energy above 0.14 ev,ZrH can moderate at least as well as free hydrogen with nenergy losses in multiples of 0.14 ev. It is possible for a neutron to gain one or more quanta, hv, in one or several

3

scatterings with a hydrogen oscillator. Since the number of the excited oscillators present in a ZrH^ lattice, ^-hu/Kt^ and the average energy level increase with temperature, the energy is strongly temperature-dependent. This is an important inherent property of ZrH^ as a moderator and is called the cell effect.

2.2 Temperature Coefficients An increase in the temperature of the fuel will

cause a relatively large increase in reactivity. This large prompt negative fuel-temperature coefficient results from the following effects:

1. Cell effect.2. Doppler effect.3. Core leakage.

2.2.1 Cell EffectThe ZrH forms an intimate mixture with the uranium, n '

thus the fuel and solid moderator temperatures rise simul­taneously. This increase in temperature increases the number of bound hydrogen atoms in excited levels exponen­tially as given by the Boltzmann factor, e-hv/Kt^ This in turn increases the probability of a neutron gaining more energy due to collisions with the bound, hydrogen. The resulting hardened neutron spectrum decreases the fission probability, and produces an increase in the fraction of

neutron leakage from the fuel element and the capture in the surrounding water.

2.2.2 Doppler EffectThere is another small contributing effect to the

prompt negative temperature coefficient associated with theneutron spectrum. This is the Doppler broadening of the 238U absorption resonances. The uranium in the fuel

O C p o oelements is approximately 20% U and 80% U. . Theincrease in temperature of the fuel element increases the

238absorption cross section of U. As a result, there is a decrease in the resonance escape.

2.2.3 Core LeakageWhen the core heats up, the cell effect increases

the escape of neutrons from the core which are captured by tihe surrounding reflector.

The components of the temperature coefficient for stainless steel clad (ZrH^ ^ ) core (2) are

1. Cell 8.2 x 10™5 (65%) per °C2. Doppler 1.8 x 10-5 (15%) per °C3. Core leakage 2.1 x 10-^ (20%) per °C

2.3 Pulse Power Excursion Behavior An inherent characteristic of the TRIGA reactor is

its self-limiting property caused by the prompt negative temperature coefficient of the fuel-moderator element. For

a large insertion of reactivity, the rate of change of the power is large compared to the production of delayed neutrons and extraneous neutrons from a source. Therefore, the production of delayed neutrons and the extraneous neutron sources can be neglected. The negative temperature feedback is almost instantaneous and the sequence of events occur within a very short period of time. Therefore, it can be assumed that.there is no heat transfer (adiabatic change). According to these assumptions, the insertion of a large amount of reactivity can be best described ana­lytically by the Fuchs-Nordheim model (4).

From the point reactor equations, the rate of change of power is given by

|n = .Plt)_E=_P n(t) + -sx c + q(t). (2)i

Neglecting neutron sources and redefining p to be reactivity in $, this equation reduces to

i f = p(5 / 3™ 1 n(t) (3)

wheren(t) = reactor power (watt) t = time (sec)P = effective delayed neutron fraction

P = excess reactivity insertion ($) & ='prompt neutron lifetime (sec).

Consider a step input reactivity (Pq ) with a lineartemperature feedback as follows:

p(t) = pQ - a AT (4)where

Pq = inserted excess reactivity ($) ot = the prompt negative temperature coefficient of

reactivity of the fuel ($/°C)AT = the increase of the fuel temperature (°C)„

The temperature dependence is given by the adiabatic model ignoring heat transfer.

= Kn (5)where

K = reciprocal of heat capacity of fuel in core (°C/watt-sec) .’

From these three basic equations, we can write the pulse shape characteristic equation as a function of time as follows (4):

h(t') = n sech^ — (6)

E(t' ) = E(1 + tanh (7)

r = 3. 524/UJ (8)

8where

n = peak power (watt)= ( £uj2 )/(2ol K) (9 )

U) = p ( Pq -1 )/^ is the reciprocal reactor period(sec- 1 ) (10)

E(t') = energy release as a function of time (watt-sec)

A (Pq — 1 )E = - — y-g- is the energy release at peak power(watt-sec)

t 1 = t . - t (sec) i otQ = the time at peak power (sec) t^ = the power excursion time (sec)

In Figure 1 the Nordheim-Fuchs model is compared with the shape of a real pulse„

Initially the pulse rises exponentially for small values of t. When the temperature has not changed ,Equation (3) is

dn _ ( P — 1) z . \dt ~ V P

which has a solution

n(t) = noea)t. (11)

This is then consistent with Equation (6) when t ' is large and negative, then

n(t1) = 4ne . (12)

Powe

r

9

n

Fuchs-Ilordheira Model

Real pulse

Delayed Neutron tailt ti o

Time

Figure 1. Power vs. time of a pulse power excursion behavior.

10The power does not fall to zero immediately as

predicted by the Fuchs-Nordheim model but falls to a level limited by the delayed neutron production which was neglected„

CHAPTER 3

. EXPERIMENTAL METHOD

A reliable method to measure the power as a function of time during a short (= 500 msec) transient has been developed as a segment of this thesis work and will be described here.

3.1 Measurement SystemA simplified diagram of the measurement system used

is shown in Figure 2.The neutron flux, which is proportional to the

power of the reactor, is converted to the current flow at the anode end of the uncompensated ion chamber. The current is transformed to a proportional voltage by a linear current amplifier. The output voltage is then converted to a pro­portional pulse rate by the Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO).

The transient pulse has a short duration time of less than .5 sec. A multi-channel analyzer in a multi­scaling operating mode was used to store the pulse train.The multi-scaler stores information with respect to time in multi-channel analyzer memory. One msec of counting time per channel was used for this measurement. The stored

11

Neutron Uncompen­sated ion chamber

High Power "Ready"voltage supply push button

current

Linear current amplifier

voltage Voltage pulse_ControlledOscillator

Digital Oscillo­volt­meter scope

Multi- ' scaler

pulse Multi­channel analyzer

digitaloutput

Printer or punch tape

Figure 2. Measurement system*

H

information is read out by a printer or punched on paper tape suitable for computer processing,

3,2 Electronic Instruments

3.2.1 Uncompensated Ion ChamberA neutron-sensitive ion chamber is used to determine

the neutron flux information. An uncompensated ion chamber has a single nitrogen-filled, boron-coated detecting volume, and is sensitive to both neutron and gamma radiation. If the neutron produced chamber current is large in comparison with gamma-produced current, it is not necessary to separate the gamma-produced current from neutron-produced current as in a compensated ion chamber. Neutrons interact with a boron coating on the detector walls according to the ■ . . following equation:

1°B + Jn -- > ^Li + 2He + Q.

This alpha particle ionizes the nitrogen gas in the chamber and produces electrons which then flow to the anode of the chamber. This current is proportional to the impinging neutron flux.

3.2.2 Linear Current AmplifierThe linear current amplifier (2) is a dc current

measuring component of the TRIGA control panel. It converts

14the dc current from the uncompensated chamber to a pro­portional voltage,

3,2,3 Voltage Controlled OscillatorA Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO) has a pulse

frequency output which is proportional to the voltage input. The pulse height can be varied, the frequency remains linear to the voltage input over a maximum range of approximately 2 volts, A smaller voltage range can be observed by amplifier adjustment.

The frequency varies linearly with the input voltage in the range 0-100 KHz with about a ,2% error, A flow diagram is shown in Figure 3 and a detail description of circuit is contained in Appendix A,

The voltage output from the linear current amplifier is amplified by the linear amplifier before it enters the integrator. The output of the integrator is initially set at 0 by the offset voltage at the input of ,0P1# which results in a Schmitt trigger output of -12 volts. When a positive voltage is received zat the amplifier input, the integrator is charged negatively until it reaches -7 volts, and this causes the Schmitt trigger to fire and produces an output of +2 volts, and turns on an n-channel field effect transistor, Q^, The capacitor of the integrator starts to discharge and clamps the input of the integrator at -7 volts, which causes the integrator to deliver a positive-going ramp

Multi-channel- 1 Sesa'analyzer

Linear Schmitttriggercurrent amp.

Linear.amplifier Integrator

Switch

Figure 3. Block diagram of VCO circuit.

16at its output terminal. The positive-going ramp continues to rise toward 0 volts, until it reaches the second threshold voltage of the Schmitt trigger of -2 volts. The Schmitt trigger fires again and its output voltage drops to -12 volts which turns off the field effect transistor.As soon as the positive-going ramp of the integrator reaches 0 volt, the cycle is completed and the circuits are reset for the next cycle. The cycle rate will be proportional to the rate of change of the input voltage to VCO.

The pulse train from the output of the Schmitt trigger is inverted and attenuated by the output amplifier of the VCO before it enters the multi-scaling of the multi­channel analyzer.

3.2.4 Multi-Channel AnalyzerThe time interval during each pulsed excursion is

short. Therefore, a multi-channel analyzer in the multi­scaler mode was used to record through the pulse rate information as a function of time.

. Each channel of the multi-channel analyzer stores the total pulses accumulated during time intervals of 1 millisecond. Since 1024 channels are available this allows a sweep time of 1.024 sec.

CHAPTER 4

MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS

4.1 Pulse MeasurementThe reactor is brought to a power of 500 watts and

set for pulsing. The operate-test switch on the front panel of the VCO plugin unit is switched to operate and the offset voltage is adjusted so that there is no pulse at the output terminals.

The "Ready" push button on the reactor control panel is pressed to initiate the pulse which starts the multi­scaler trigger circuit and initiates the multi-channel analyzer to store information. The sweep is set at 1 msec per channel.

After one sweep all 1024 channels of analyzer are stored. The stored data are then read out and printed on a paper tape.

4.2 Data AnalysisThe measured data for various reactivities plotted

on a linear graph are shown in Figure 4. The pulse peak power, half maximum power width, and total energy released are shown in Table 1.

The peak powers and total energies released shown in Table 2 were experimentally obtained with this system. The

17

200 "

OJB

100

4003002001000Time (msec)

Figure 4. Power vs. time at various reactivity insertions^ oo

19Table 1. The measured parameters at various reactivity

insertions.

p($) t (msec)n(number of

pulse)E(number of pulse-sec)

Gain knob at

1.20 166.5 96.0 16.8560 8.001. 30 96. 5 80.0 8.0720 3.001.40 68. 5 59.0 4.6575 1.001.50 55.0 78.0 . 4.9880 0.801. 55 48. 5 76. 5 4.2560 0.601. 60 - 45.0 91. 5 4.7175 0.601. 75 36.0 107.5 4.2360 0.401.85 31.0 108.5 3.7870 0.25

Table 2. Peak power, total power pulse width

energy release, and half maximum at various reactivity insertions.

P($) t (msec) n (M w ) E(Mw-sec)1.20 166.5 18.0 2.821.30 96.5 38.0 4. 501.40 68.5 72.2 5. 681.50 55.0 109.0 6. 661.55 48.5 155.0 7.581. 60 45.0 164.7 8.401.75 36.0 268.0 9.601.85 31.0 319.0 11.10

20data were collected instantaneously and integrated with a 1024 channel analyzer. The number of pulses was converted to volts and volt-sec by comparing with the calibration curve. Figure A2, These voltages were then converted to megawatts and megawatt-secs, using the fact known from the reactor control circuit calibration that the linear current amplifier gives 4,64 volts at the reactor power of 2000 Mw„

From Equation (5),o mh(t. ) = n sech -~-(t - t . ), i 2 o i

The parameter u> is determined by a least square fit of one unknown (5), we may write

, T.2 w. . .d . = n. - n sech -=-(t - t . ) x i 2 o x

where n^ and t^ are the measured values of power and time.Setting

- £ d? = Jr— £ [n.-n sech^ t -t. ) ]6tui " "i - ^ 2 ' o" x

we obtain

2 n £ [n.-n sech^ t -t. ) ]sech^ ■ ■(t -t. ) tanh - (t -t. ) ^ L x 2 o x 2 o x 2 o x

(t -t.) = 0 (13)O X

which is solved for uu by iteration, the computed values are shown in Table 3.

21Table 3. W and at various.reactivities.

p($) t (msec) n (Mw) E(Mw-sec) tti (sec) "T, .-jjtsec)

1.20 166.5 18.0 2.8216 23.20 .008621. 30 96. 5 38.0 4.6050 40.05 .007491.40 . 68. 5 72.2 5.6800 58.00 .007891.50 55.0 109.0 6.7200 61.00 .008201. 55 ■ 48.5 155.0 7.5810 71.30 .007711. 60 41.5 164.7 8.6000 77.45 .007751. 75 36.0 268.0 9.6000 99.80 .007521.85 31.0 319.0 11.1000 114.00 .00809

From Equation (10), we find that

j = - sec. (14)

-g- can then be computed from the reactivities and&computed value of w. The computed is shown in Table 3.

The mean value plus the standard deviation is

•g- = . 0079 j- .0004 sec.

From Equation (9), we obtain that

22

2 2 _ (1 5 )^2 - 2a K " 2A graph of n versus uu is shown in Figure 5„ A

least square analysis yields the slope ^ („ 0258+. 0012)a k ^from which — can be computed0

. Peak

Power

(Mw)

300"

200 ■ ■

100

4 6 .8 102 . 3 -2 xw ( xlO sec . )

Figure 5o Peak power (Mw) vs. W

12

CHAPTER 5

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK

5.1 Conclusion In this study it was demonstrated that the Voltage

Control Oscillator can satisfactorily process the detector ' voltage output during the pulse type excursion of the TRIGA reactor. The analog information is converted to computable pulses for analysis and stored in a multi-channel analyzer. The VCO, as designed, can suitably measure data over a wide range of power from 1 to 319 Mw as can be expected in

. pulsing with reactivity insertion of $1 to $1.85.In addition to demonstrating the feasibility of the

data processing and storage, the experiment information was analyzed to determine some basic reactor parameters. These are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4. Experimentally determined parameters for the TRIGA Mark I reactor

Fuel elementV P(sec)

V20.K (Mw-sec )

CCK/I3 (Mw-sec)“type number clad

UZrH1.7 87 ss .0079+.0004 .0258+.0012 .154+. 011

24

255.2 Future Work

The reciprocal heat capacity of the fuel core (K) is not known but can be determined experimentally. A thermo­couple can be used to measure the increase in the fuel temperature. The time dependent behavior of the fuel is shown in Figure 6. The temperature of the fuel element initially rises as an exponential but then follows the integral of equation (P-l)/ (&/£$ ) tanh wt/2 when a step insertion of reactivity is made. At point A when the Fuchs-Nordheim model predicts that the power has returned to zero, the temperature is still slightly rising due to delayed neutrons. The temperature at point A can be obtained from the Fuchs-Nordheim (4) model equation:

AT = 2-( Pa/p'1 ") °c (16)where

AT = the increase in temperature (°C) p = the reactivity insertion ($)a = the prompt negative temperature coefficient of the

fuel (1/°C)3 = the effective delayed neutron fraction.

Thus, if we knew AT, co/3 could be computed. Using the ccK/3 in Table 4 we can compute K„

Another important parameter of the reactor is the heat capacity, C, of the reactor fuel elements, which may be assumed to vary linearly with temperature, T:

26

Real curveDelayedneutrontail

Fuchs-NordheimModel

Time

gure 6. Fuel temperature as a function of time.

27

C = C + C T - a- t~-SeC (17)° 1 °C

where Cq and are coefficients and T = the temperature of fuel, °C„

We can derive new equations for power and energy after replacing 1/K by (C = Cq + C^T)„ Then Cq and can be determined by' analysis of data (4, 6)»

APPENDIX A

VOLTAGE CONTROL OSCILLATOR

The VCO circuit used to measure the power of the pulse reactor power excursion in this experiment is comprised of eight parts as follows:

1. A linear amplifier.2. An integrator.3. A Schmitt trigger.4. A reference voltage.5. An inverted amplifier.6. A test voltage.7. A voltage regulator.8. A multi-scaler trigger circuit

The circuit diagram of this VCO circuit is shown in Figure Al. Calibration curves for the voltage versus pulse output at different gains are shown in Figure A2„

The linear amplifier contains a dual operational amplifier. The gain knob is on the front panel, is connected between the input and output of OP 2. This makes it possible for the linear amplifier to be operated at various input voltage.

The integrator uses 1/2 of another dual operational amplifier, it converts the positive voltage from the linear amplifier to a negative-going ramp at its output terminal.

28

+16 v

CIO MS CllR18R19

+16 v2*13VWv--

rM7, M6 C12 T* R2 7on OP2

OP3-12 vOP4

M6Ml-12 *D5 +12 ■16 v

Voltage reguratorMl Cl*Multl-ecaler •tart programM4

"Beady" puah buttOhMO B31M3

n r R30DAD6

Multl-ecsler trigger circuit

Figure Al. VCO circuit.

Number

of pu

lses

Gain at 0.25.

ko\

Calibration: 4,64V 2000 Mw

0.1 0.2Input voltage '

Figure A2„ Number of pulses vs, input voltage at various gains for the VCO circuit.

1

31The Schmitt trigger is built with the other half of

the operational amplifier (OP 4). Its threshold levels are determined by the resistors R4 and R5 and by the -6,2 volts reference voltage attached to R4,

The reference network provides a common input bias compensation for the OP 3 and supplies the threshold voltage for the OP 4, The diodes D1 and D2 and resistor R6 stabilize the -7 volts threshold voltage for any unstability of -12 volts supply.

The inverted amplifier is a common amplifier using a NPN transistor, Q2 and a potentio-resistor, R35, where the output pulse train is inverted and attenuated to be a . negative pulse train with a maximum voltage of -0,5 volts.

The test voltage is accomplished with two resistors R22, R23 and a potentio-resistor R35, The series resistors are connected between a reference voltage of +2 volts and ground, This voltage is used to calibrate the VCO,

The regulated voltage is built with a PNP transistor Q4 and a NPN transistor Q3, The collectors of both tran­sistors are connected with the Hh 24 volts power supply of the NIM BIN, The zener diodes D 7 , D8 give reference voltages to the bases of both transistors, so that, the emitters of both transistors have the regulated voltages of + 16 volts. These regulated voltages are used for the power supply of the VCO,

32Multi-scaler trigger circuit is accomplished with

two resistors R29, R30, a capacitor, C14 and a voltage source of +9 volts. The purpose of this circuit is to give a start pulse to trigger the multi-scaling as soon as the ready pulse is pressed and prohibit the second trigger pulse from the rod drop from triggering the multiscaling mode. Table 5 gives a parts listing for the VCO circuit.

33Table 5. Parts list of the VCO circuit.

0P1Q1Q2Q3Q4D1D2D3,D5D6D7,XI,R3,R4 ,R6,R7R8,R12R13R14R16R17R18R21R23R24R25R27R30R31R32R33R35Cl,C2C3,C5C7C9CIOCl 2

, OP2, OP3, OP4

D4

D8R2, R15, R19 R9, RIO R5, R14 R22, R29Rll, R26

, R20

R28R34

C6, C8C4

1/2 HEP C-6051L HEP F-0021 ■HEP 53 HEP 128 HEP 129 ‘1N241 ECG 140 ECG 5014 ECG 2000 ECG 5000 ECG 2605

Cll, Cl4 C13

1,5 Kohms, 1/4 watt470,0 Ko hms, 1/4 watt12,0 Kohms, 1/4 watt

680,0 Kohms, 1/4 watt36.0 Kohms, 1/4 watt1. 6 Kohms, 1/4 watt

330.0 Kohms, 1/4. watt1.0 Kohms, 1/4 watt

12.0 Kohms, 1/4 watt18.0 Kohms, 1/4 watt10.0 Ko hms, 1/4 watt68.0 Kohms, 1/4 watt22.0 Kohms, 1/4 watt3.3 Kohms, 1/4 watt2.2 Kohms, 1/4 watt7.5 Ko hms, 1/4 watt1.8 Kohms, 1/4 watt

4000.0 Kohms, 1/4 watt50.0 Kohms, 1/4 watt

100.0 Kohms, pot.450.0 Kohms, pot.300.0 Kohms, pot.

500 PF590 PF10 PF

150 PF22 PF33 PF

;02 UF.1 HF

APPENDIX B

SYSTEM OPERATION AND CALIBRATION

The connection and operation of the pulse reactor power measurement system will be discussed in this appendix. In Figure B1 is shown a connection diagram of this system,

1, The system connection. The input of the VCO is connected to the right safety channel amp output.The output of the VCO is connected to the input of an oscilloscope and the "amp. in."of the MCS. The start program of the MCS is connected to a multi­scaler trigger circuit which is connected, to the MCS Triggering of the reactor control circuit.

2. The system operation. The Multi-channel Analyzer is reset and switched to count. The At of the MCS is at .001 sec, the coarse and fine gain are at 2 and .5 respectively. Initially the Operate-Test switch is at Test, The Gain knob of the VCO is set at the position which will give 100 pulses per msec at peak power. When the reactor is at pulse-low mode, the Operate-Test switch will be switched to Operate, then the VCO is offset by a pot. resistor (R34) as shown in Figure B1 until there is no pulse on the

34

Input voltage test point

Operate-Test-

Right board of reactor control

Rightsafety channel amp. out

— O

Test volt © OIn 0 ut

Multi-channel analyzer

Corse gain

Fine gain-Power

supply input

Multi-scaler

Ampin.

C AT

Voltage Controlled Oscillator

Start program

Multi-scaler triger circuit

OscilloscopeMid board of reactor control circuit

MCS triggering

Figure Bl. The connection diagram of the pulse reactor power measurement system

36screen of the Oscilloscope. In case the VCO can not be offset with R34, it can be accomplished by turn­ing R31 until it is completely reset. When the VCO is offset, it is ready to measure the pulse reactor power.The calibration of VCO. The calibration of VCO can be done by switching the Operate-Test switch to Test. The Gain is set at the calibrated position and is offset in the same way as 2 above. At this position the input voltage of VCO is given by the built-in test voltage. The input voltage can be measured by a digital volt-meter when its input is connected to the input voltage outlet of VCO and the number of pulses is read out on the paper tape. The calibrated value of VCO is shown in Figure Bl.

REFERENCES

TRIGA Reactor Description. San Diego, California: General Atomic, 1958.

Mikesell, R. E. Instrumentation Manual for the Torrey Pines TRIGA Reactor. San Diego, California: Gulf General Atomic Inc., GA-7275, 1966.

Young, J. C., Young, J. A .# Houghton, G. H . , Trimble,G . D . t and Beyster, J. R. "Neutron Thermalization in Zirconium Hydride," Nuclear Science and Engineer­ing. 19:230-241, 1964.

Hetrick, D . L. "The Nordheim-Fuchs Model," Dynamic of Nuclear Reactors. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1971.

Young, H. H. "Least Squares with Several Unknowns," Statistical Treatment of Experimental Data. New York: McGraw-Hill Company, 1962.

Scaletter, R. The Fuchs-Nordheim Model with Variable Heat Capacity. San Diego, California: General Dynamics, Gulf General Atomic Inc., GA-3416, 1962.


Recommended