POWER SECTOR RESTRUCTURING
LESSONS LEARNT FROM THE
PHILIPPINES EXPERIENCE
Anthony J Jude
Chair Energy Committee
Senior Advisor concurrent Practice Leader [Energy]
25 November 2013, Bangkok. Thailand
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
Genesis of the Reform - Why the power sector reform was needed?
Roadmap of the Reform - Concept, sequence and timeframe
ADB’s Supporting Role - TA, project & program loans, guarantee
Assessment of the Reform - What has been achieved so far?
Lessons Learned and Challenges
Genesis of the Reform
GENESIS OF THE REFORM (1)
• In mid-1980s, the Government scrapped Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (620MW),
$2.3 billion, fully repaid in April 2007;
• In early 1990s, Luzon experienced severe power shortages due to inadequate generation capacity – NPC (No Power Corporation)!
• Emergency power was granted by Congress.
• Government contracted IPPs to resolve the power crisis – over 6,000 MW contracted with take-or-pay provision guaranteed by the Government.
• Meralco also contracted 2,000 MW from IPPs.
GENESIS OF THE REFORM (2)
• The projected peak demand in 2004 for the Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao grids would be 9,303 megawatts (MW), 1,496 MW, and 1,964 MW, respectively.
• However, the actual peak demand was only 6,728
MW for Luzon (38% below forecast), 1,063 MW for
Visayas (40% below forecast), and 1,278 MW for
Mindanao (53% below forecast) in 2004
• NPC incurred a heavy debt burden, large debt service obligations and take-or-pay contracts of IPPs, and NPC’s long term debts were about 30% of Government’s contingent liabilities in 2004.
Pre-EPIRA Power Sector Structure
Vertically Integrated IPPs are mostly contracted by
NPC NPC owns portfolios of plants Tariffs are regulated Cross Subsidies embedded in
the rates
Customers
Large Industries and Bulk Users
DUs/ECs
IPPs NPC Plants
Roadmap of the Reform
COMPONENTS OF POWER SECTOR
REFORM • Unbundling: generation, transmission, distribution, supply,
metering services
• Independent regulation (technical & price)
• Removal of subsidies and cross subsidies
• Privatization of generation (ownership, cross-ownership
restriction)
• Privatization of transmission (performance-based
regulation)
• Privatization of distribution (performance based regulation)
• Wholesale competition (independent market operator)
• Retail competition/open access
• Liquidation of stranded debt & costs of national power
company
PHILIPPINES VS INDONESIA
Indonesia Electricity Law 2009 Philippines EPIRA 2001
Unbundling May be conducted in an integrated manner" or
in one business type.
Unbundled generation; transmission
Distribution, supply
Open access Transmission open access Transmission and distribution open access
Cross
ownership
No mention No one group can own more than 30% of
the installed capacity
Subsidies or
Cross
subsidies
Electricity prices to take consumers' interest to
account; Special tariffs for underprivileged
consumers
All subsides removed, with exception of
lifeline rate
Regulation By Government or regional Government Energy Regulatory Commission
Pricing
Methodology
Arranged by Government/or regional
Government based on national interests,
consumers' interests, production costs….
competitive pricing for generation, and
supplies; performance based pricing for
transmission/distribution
Privatization No - privatization of government owned
generation assets and transmission
concession
Wholesale
competition
No clear rules, "healthy competition" based on
Government regulation
wholesale spot market (price based
bidding gross pool)
Retail
competition
No mention Retail competition subject to 70% of
privatization of generation capacity
AGMO
GENCOs
NGCP
SUPPLIERS/ AGGREGATORS
S P U G
LEGEND
Enforcement Coordination ERC Reg. Ownership/ Policymaking Operation Supervision Transfer Control
Competitive ERC Regulated
PIOUs/ ECs -CDA
INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS
ECs
IMO
JCPC
TransCo
Electric Power Industry Structure
OLD PRICING REGIME VS NEW PRICING REGIME
Moving Towards A Competitive Power Market …
26 December 2012
• 79.56 % of NPC GenCos in Luzon and Visayas
• NGCP as the TransCo Concessionaire
• 76.85% transferred to IPP Administrators
Unbundling
Unbundling of NPC rates (26 Mar. 2002)
and Unbundling of DUs rates (June 2003).
Complied with.
Status of EPIRA Implementation
Inter-Grid, Sept. 2002; Intra-Grid, Oct. 2005 and Inter-Class, Oct. 2005
Complied with. Removal of Cross Subsidies
Complied with.
OPEN ACCESS AND RETAIL COMPETITION
• Luzon Commercial Operation on June 2006 • Integration of Visayas Grid, 26 Dec. 2010
Establishment of WESM Complied with.
PHILIPPINES
Update on EPIRA Implementation
NPC31%
PSALM49%
First Gen 11%
QPPL3%
Others6%
Pre-Privatization (2003)
As of March 2013
San Miguel 19%
Aboitiz 15%
First Gas 13%
PSALM 18%
AES 4%
SEM Calaca
4%
GN Power
4%
QPPL 3%
NPC 8%
GBPC 3%
SPC 2%
Others 7%
Installed Capacity Share Monitoring
Update on EPIRA Implementation
Installed Capacity Share Monitoring
Aboititz Group 17%
NPC 51%
PSALM 27%
Others 5%
MIndanao
GBPC 27%
SPC 15%
Green Core 12%
Aboitiz 6%
NPC 2%
PSALM 35%
Others 3%
Visayas
San Miguel 26%
Aboitiz 16%
First Gas 15%
PSALM 14%
AES 5%
GN Power 5%
QPPL 4%
SEM Calaca
5% NPC 2%
Others 8%
Luzon
As of March 2013
ADB’s Supporting Role
ADB LOANS AND GUARANTEE
• December 1998: ADB approved the Power
Sector Restructuring Program for $300 million,
and a project loan of $40 million for
establishing WESM.
• December 2002, ADB approved a partial credit
guarantee (PCG) for US$500 million equivalent.
• December 2006: ADB approved the Power
Development Program for $450 million.
ADB TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
• Electricity pricing and regulatory practice in a competitive environment ($600,000), 1998
• Consumer impact assessment of PSRP
($720,000), 2000
• Competition Policy for the Electricity Sector ($990,000), 2001
• Transition to Competitive Electricity Markets
($800,000), 2002
• Promoting Good Governance in the Restructured Power Sector ($800,000), 2003
• Institutional Strengthening of ERC and Privatization of NPC ($1,200,000), 2004
Assessment of the Reform
WHAT HAS BEEN ACHIEVED
• Independent Energy Regulatory Commission established
• All inter-grids, intra-grid, inter-class subsidies removed (except lifeline rate)
• WESM operational in Luzon and Visayas
• 23 power plants (3072 MW), i.e. 81% of NPC asset privatized, $3 billion
• Sual (1000 MW), Pagbilao (700MW), San Roque (345 MW), Bakun-Benguet (100 MW),
• 44% of IPP capacity; • IPP Administrators appointed, $2.3 billion
• TRANSCO Concession awarded, $3.95 billion
• Stranded debt: Introduction of Universal Charges (P0.30/kWh for 25 years)
• Interim Mindanao Electricity Market – 26 Sept’13
PRIVATIZATION OF GENCOS
Assets Capacity
(MW)
Winner Bid Price
($ million)
Unit Cost
($ million/MW)
Masinloc Coal 600 AES, USA 930 1.55
Calaca Coal 600 Semirara, PHI 361.7 0.60
Tiwi-Makban
Geothermal
747 Aboitiz, PHI 446.9 0.59
Limay Oil 620 San Miguel, PHI 13.5 0.02
Magat Hydro 360 Aboitiz, PHI 530 1.47
WHAT HAS NOT BEEN ACHIEVED
• Appointment of Independent market Operator (IMO)
• Retail competition subject to 70% of IPPAs
• Weak distribution sector (electric cooperatives)
• Lack of private sector investment for new capacity?
Retail Competition and Open Access
POLICY FRAMEWORK 34
Efficiency and Competition
Effective Governance and
Regulation
Consumer Empowerment
and Protection
35
Provides the Power of Choice to
the Electricity End-Users
Ensures proper environment is in
place
POLICY FRAMEWORK
MARKET DESIGN
RELEVANT RULES FOR CONTESTABLE
CUSTOMERS
37
MANDATORY CONTESTABILITY AND CUSTOMER
CHOICE
38
DOE Department Circular No. DC 2012-05-0005
• Consistent with EPIRA, RCOA should promote customer choice
• The power of choice is conferred to Contestable Customers (CCs) subject to the rules and regulations
Power of Choice
• CCs shall be allowed to choose where to source its supply of electricity
• CCs may source electricity supply requirements from a Supplier duly licensed by ERC, a Local Supplier duly authorized by the ERC, or through the WESM
Customer Empowerment
*Slide Prepared by PEMC
QUALIFIED CONTESTABLE CUSTOMERS
(CCS)
Section 31 EPIRA
DOE Department Circular No. DC 2012-05-0005
• Provides that upon the initial implementation of RCOA, the ERC shall allow all electricity end-users with a monthly average peak demand of at least one megawatt (1 MW) for the preceding twelve (12) months to be the contestable market
Section 31 of EPIRA
• Refers to the electricity end-users who have a choice of a supplier of electricity, as may be determined by the ERC in accordance with the EPIRA
Contestable Market
• Refers to the electricity end-user who is part of the contestable market
Contestable Customer
TIMELINES OF RCOA IMPLEMENTATION
40
FIRST YEAR TIMELINE OF IMPLEMENTATION
Customer Switching Start (26 December 2013 onwards)
Regular Customer Switching
WESM Transactions for Newly Registered Customers
Continuing Registration and Training
SOLR Service or Disconnection
Initial Commercial Operations (26 June 2013 – 25 December 2013)
WESM Transactions for Registered Customers
Retail Supply Contracts
Registration of Non-Registered Customers
No Customer Switching
SOLR Service or Disconnection/Remain with DU
Transition Period (26 December 2012 – 25 June 2013)
Retail Supply Contracts Metering Installations Registration and
Training Trial Operations
Declaration of Open Access Date (26 December 2012)
ERC/DOE Joint Declaration of the Commencement of RCOA
PEMC (as CRB) calls for registration
41
*Slide Prepared by PEMC
ERC TRANSITORY RULES RESOLUTION NO. 11, SERIES OF 2013 DATED 10 JUNE 2013
A CC that fails to enter into an RSC by June 25, 2013
shall be deemed to stay with its current DU until
December 25, 2013, or until such time that it is
able to find a RES, provided that it informs DU of
such fact on or before June 25, 2013.
Continue to pay the regulated rates of the DU.
42
GOVERNMENT INITIATIVES 43
Conduct of Trainings and Information and
Education Campaigns (IECs)
RCOA Get-Together for CCs and RESs
Focus Group IECs
General Public IECs
Continuing Collaboration with ERC and PEMC
Monitoring and Evaluation for Needed Policy
Actions
Recent Developments …
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 44
From 18 Respondent CCs
Contract duration ranges from 18 months to seven (7) years
Off-Peak Prices: approx. P3.2553 per kWh; Peak Prices: approx.
P6.4642 per kWh; others based on Load Factor
With Pre-Termination Charges and Replacement Power Provision
DOE Supplementary Policy
Allows prospective GenCos to contract with CCs provided
RES License is secured before effective date of the Supply
Contract with CCs; and
Allows Switching when “Superior Offer” comes; ERC to
define “Superior Offer.”
19 licensed
Retail Electricity
Suppliers (RES),
27 SOLR
Providers
and 18 Local RES
The Contestable Market
(November 2012)
Grid No. of
Customers
Power
Demand
(MW)
Luzon 801 2,639
MERALCO 638 1,827
Visayas 96 759
VECO 39 225
UPDATES …
Source: ERC
REGISTRATION
Participant Expected2
Total
Application
Received
Registered
On-Going
Completion of
Requirements
Retail Electricity
Suppliers 19 19 15 4
Local Retail Electricity
Suppliers 18 12 5 7
Retail Metering Services
Providers 39 27 23 4
Contestable Customers 892 297 257 40
Suppliers of Last Resort 27 7 2 5
Total1 995 362 302 60
1 As of 26 September 2013 2 Based on ERC’s RCOA website: www.buyyourelectricty.com
LIST OF LICENSED RES
1. Cabanatuan Electric
Corporation.
2. Masinloc Power Partners Co.
Ltd.
3. Aboitiz Energy Solutions,
Inc.
4. Advent Energy, Inc.
5. Direct Power Services, Inc.
6. Ecozone Power
Management, Inc.
7. Ferro Energy, Inc.
8. First Gen. Energy Solutions,
Inc.
9. Global Energy Supply
Corporation
10. GN Power Ltd. Co.
11. GNPower Mariveles Coal
Plant Ltd. Co.
12. Kratos RES, Inc.
13. Premier Energy Resources
Corp.
14. Prism Energy, Inc.
15. San Miguel Electric
Corporation
16. SEM-Calaca RES Corp.
17. SN Aboitiz Power RES
18. Team Philippines Energy
Corp.
19. Trans-Asia Oil and Energy
Development Corp.
LIST OF LOCAL RES
1. Angeles Electricity Corporation (AEC)
2. Manila Electric Company (MERALCO)
3. Dagupan Electric Corporation (DECORP)
4. Visayan Electric Company (VECO)
5. Subic Enerzone Corporation (SEZ)
6. Bohol Light Company, Inc. (BLCI)
7. Tarlac Electric, Inc. (TEI)
8. San Fernando Electric Light & Power Co. (SFELAPCO)
9. Ilocos Norte Electric Cooperative, Inc. (INEC)
10. Nueva Ecija I Electric Cooperative, Inc. (NEECO I)
11. Cebu I Electric Cooperative, Inc. (CEBECO I)
12. Cebu III Electric Cooperative, Inc. (CEBECO III)
13. Batelec II Electric Cooperative, Inc. (BATELEC II)
14. Benguet Electric Cooperative, Inc. (BENECO)
15. Cebu II Electric Cooperative, Inc. (CEBECO II)
Lessons Learnt and Challenges
LESSONS LEARNT:
ISSUES, SEQUENCE AND TIMEFRAME
• Issues: No mandatory bilateral contract
between NPC power plants and distribution
utilities – investors have no PPA to finance
their purchase
• Sequence: Should WESM be established
before privatization of NPC assets ? – Market
power
• Timeframe: EPIRA’s implementation timeline
totally unrealistic
POWER SECTOR REFORM IN THE
PHILIPPINES - A SUCCESS STORY?
Question: How to judge & measure if power sector reform is
successful?
- Competitive electricity rate?
- Sustainable power supply?
- Promoting renewable energy?
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J
Pri
ce
, P/M
Wh
Effective Buying Price Effective Selling Price Cumulative Ave. Buying Price
Effective Settlement Prices
2007 2008 2006
P4,497/MWh
2009
Market Results
CHALLENGES AHEAD
Challenge No.1: Will electricity rate will be cheaper? - probably not, but…
Challenge No. 2: Will private sector accept merchant risk and invest in new capacity?
– yes, with ADB support initially, then the experienced investors will continue
Challenge No.3: Will competitive markets promote renewable energy?
- WESM will include renewable energy market based on renewable energy law
The most expensive power is the power we don’t have.
THANK YOU