+ All Categories
Home > Business > PowerPoint

PowerPoint

Date post: 09-Sep-2014
Category:
Upload: dominque23
View: 12 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
Popular Tags:
11
1 Jeffrey F. Driver, JD Executive Vice President Chief Risk Officer Stanford University Medical Indemnity and Trust Insurance Company Stanford University Medical Center November 18, 2008 The Model Methodology Part III Solutions and Implementation
Transcript
Page 1: PowerPoint

1

Jeffrey F. Driver, JDExecutive Vice President

Chief Risk Officer

Stanford University Medical Indemnity and Trust Insurance CompanyStanford University Medical Center

November 18, 2008

The Model Methodology Part IIISolutions and Implementation

Page 2: PowerPoint

The Model Methodology: Data Into Action

2

Capture vulnerabilities as they occur– Contemporaneous analysis of asserted malpractice cases

Put them into context – Integration of relevant denominator data and peer comparative data

Are you still vulnerable? – Assessment of present-tense risk through risk assessments, focus groups

Determine potential solutions – Continuous identification of relevant models, processes, education, and training programs that

address key risk areas

Implement, educate, train– Championship by high-level leadership to effect real change and to sustain it

Measure/Metrics– Measure the impact in the near term (with a predictive eye for the long term)

Page 3: PowerPoint

PEARL – Process for Early Assessment and Resolution of Loss

3

Process for the Early Assessment &Resolution of Loss(PEARL)

Page 4: PowerPoint

PEARL Process Flow

4

Page 5: PowerPoint

• clinical judgement—sel/mgmt med

• pt monitoring—med regimen

• commun among prov—pt cond

• pt/fam edu—risks of meds

• med error—dispensing

• incorrect drug administration

• supervision—house staff

• sel/mgmt therapy—labor & delivery

• sel/mgmt therapy—pregnancy

• supervision—nursing

• fail/delay obtain consult/ref

• commun among prov—pt cond

• fail/delay ordering dx test

• pt monitoring—physiological

RM Issues

Summary of Model Patient Safety Initiatives

DiagnosticDiagnostic SurgicalSurgical OBOB MedicationMedication TargetTarget

Decision Making Support in EHR

• Diagnostic guidelines• Diagnostic algorithms

Closed Loop Communication

• Results Manager • Referral Manager• Pt. access to results• Tickler files for test & referral follow- up

Incidental Findings Follow-up

• Communicating Critical Test Results

Models/Solutions

Team Training: Improve Communication (e.g.)• Improved Consent Process• Surgical Safety Checklist

• Briefings (e.g., OR, morning/ shift)

• Timeouts

• Use of Critical Language / SBAR

• Communication triggers, residents to attendingsBar Coding /RFID • Retained FBsSimulation (e.g.) • FLS: Fundamentals of Laparascopic Surgery

▪ Team Training

▪ In-Situ Emergency Recognition training

Informed Consent Enhancement

▪ EMMI

Proactive Risk mAssessments

Team Training: Improve Communication (e.g.)• Briefings (e.g., OR, morning / shift)

• Use of Critical Language

EFM: Electronic Fetal Monitoring Education

▪ Existing education and APS

Decision Support (e.g., Obstetrical Care Guidelines) Embedded in EMR

Shoulder Dystocia Drills

Simulation (e.g.) • Shoulder Dystocia• Crisis response• Team Training

Proactive Risk Assessments▪ Labor and Delivery▪ Nurseries

Informed Consent Enhancement• EMMI

Medication Reconciliation (at all transition points)

▪Yes at SUMC

Improve Ordering Process (e.g.)

• CPOE: computerized physician order entry• E-Prescribing

Bar Coding

▪ Yes at SUMC

Improve Documentation• EMAR: electronic medication administration record

SHC Medication Administration “quiet time”

Page 6: PowerPoint

• misinterp of dx studies

• patient did not receive result

• commun among prov—pt cond

• fail to est differential dx

• fail in f/u sys—new finding

• lack/inad—history & physical

• result not recv'd by clin—oth

• results filed b/f clin review

• supervision—hosue staff

• commun among prov—pt cond

• poss tech prob

• fail to respond—pts concerns

• fail/delay order dx test

• misinterp of dx studies

• inadequate cons for surg proc

• fail to ensure patient safety

• policy/protocol not followed

• pt monitoring—physiological

• improperly utilized equip

• fail to respond—pts concerns

• staff training/education

• insuf/lack doc—clin findings

• pt monitoring—med regimen

Summary of Model Patient Safety Initiatives

NursingNursing EDED ResidentsResidents RadiologyRadiologyTargetTarget

• lack/inad asses—premature d/c

• fail to est differential dx

• access/scheduling/waiting

• supervision— house staff

• fail to read medical record

• insuf/lack doc—clin findings

• sel/mgmt therapy—medical

RM Issues

Models/Solutions

Team Training: Improve Communication (e.g.)• Briefings (e.g., OR, morning / shift)• SBAR (or other agreed upon tool)• Dashboard• Use of Critical Language

Simulation Training: Crisis Response, Cognitive, Technical skills

▪ Yes at SUMC

Organizational Policy re: Inpatient Boarders

Improve Communication (e.g.)

• Briefings (e.g., OR, morning / shift)• Use of Critical Language• Triggers (e.g., surgical care guidelines)

Fall Prevention Protocols

▪ Safe Patient Handling Programs

Infection Control Protocols (e.g.)

• Wound Care Team

Improve Communication (e.g.)

• Briefings (e.g., OR, morning / shift)• Care Guidelines (triggers when to notify supervising attending)• SBAR for handoffs

Team Training

Simulation Training▪ All surgical residents get Simulation Training and new interns now receive patient safety training via simulation

Communication of Test Results per ACR Guidelines• Preliminary reports • Failsafe procedures• Documentation (e.g., clarity of report, re: communication of results)

Triggers embedded in EMR (e.g., allergies, medications, health history)

▪ Yes at SUMC

Double Reads (e.g., audits)

▪ Yes at SUMC

Tickler System for Ensuring Follow-up

Page 7: PowerPoint

The Model Methodology: Data Into Action

7

Engagement in High Risk Areas – RMF Data – Fully-coded SHC Cases by responsible service

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

nu

mb

er

of

case

s

Claim Count

N=270 fully-coded SHC PL cases asserted 1/1/03-5/7/08.*Other includes Pathology, Allied Health, and Pharmacy.Total Incurred=aggregate of expenses, reserves, and payments on open and closed cases.Surgery=General Surgery, Orthopedics, Neurosurgery, Bariatric Surgery, Colorectal Surgery, Cardiac Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology (with Plastic), Hand Surgery, Ophthalmology, Otolaryngology (No plastic), Plastic (NOC), Pediatric Surgery, Oncology (Surgical), Thoracic Surgery, Urology Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Transplant, Podiatry.Medicine Subspecialty=Cardiology, Dermatology, Endocrinology, Gastroenterology, Genetics, Geriatrics, Hematology, Hospitalist, Immunology and Allergy, Infectious Disease, Oncology (Medical), Nephrology, Neurology, Physical Medicine/Rehabilitation, Pulmonary Disease, Rheumatology.

Page 8: PowerPoint

Perioperative Services Review Based on Claims Data

• Surgical Specialties are inherently high risk

• Besides RMF coded data, a number of unusual events within perioperative services

• Led to engagement of an outside consultant to assist SUMC with a full scale peri-operative services risk assessment (% day review, 4 consultants)

Page 9: PowerPoint

Results• 85 page report from the consultants outlining both best practices

and areas that could be improved

• Report also listed recommendations from the consultants as well as evidence based solutions

• 55 page action plan developed by internal experts

– Policies re-written

– Recommended improvements put in place by Medical Leadership and Nursing Leadership

– Partnership between Risk Management and Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Departments for action planning and implementation

Page 10: PowerPoint

Other Action Items from Deep Coded Data

• Simulation programs funded by SUMIT to address areas of vulnerability

• APS education to be offered to physicians in the next few months

• PEARL process implemented to assist physicians with disclosure of unanticipated and adverse outcomes, to learn from preventable outcomes on a real-time basis, and to compensate patients for injuries

• EMMI programs available for physicians to enhance the informed consent process and patient education– One early success story (ENT case)

Page 11: PowerPoint

Questions?

Thank you!!!


Recommended