18.11.
Community
Stall
25.10.
1st Meeting
StART
20.11.
Health
Group
21.11.
Strategy
Group
23.11.
Environment
Group
+
Housing
Group
27.11.
Inclusion
Group
30.11.
Selby
Trust
14.12.
Presentation
today
02.12.
New Members
Group
HEALTH&WELL-BEING
DIVERSITY&CULTURE
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The London Plan &Wolves Lane community
PU3: Practice Development Planning ModuleMSc Urban Development Planning
December 2017
Authors:Masato AkashiGordon JenningsKaixin LinDaniela MuñozQiuhua QiYuqi ShiShaba TaskinFernando ToroVivian Yeboah
LONDON
GROWN
GO GROWN
WOLVES LANE
HORICULTURAL
CENTER
WOLVES LANE COMMUNITY
FRIENDS OF
WOLVES LANE
2. Forming an SIA through the lens of Wolves Lane
Objective> how we applied SIA methodology process in timeWhat we went through, the process so far, what we did so far.How did we produce the SIARelational to the draft plan
THE LONDON PLANNING SYSTEM BE RESPONSIVE TO FOOD SOVEREIGNTY CLAIM ?
Defining Food Sovereignty
Deirdre⭐Dee⭐Woods
LLONDON GROWN
GO GROW
Accessible Food + Community + Inclusion + Education + Space + Participation + Culture
FOOD SOVEREIGNTY
Groups who usually have access to community spaces are not diverse. They don’t represent London.
Yvonne
The community
needs to be in the heart of
any development plan
Moussa
We want Wolves Lane to be a community Centre, for all.
Mandy
We want to make a change, for a more a more
caring communitySalford
Healthy food is not affordable for ordinary working class.
Angela
01
02
03
04
05
06
01 02 03 04
Social Impact
Assessment: Gypsies and
Travellers in Southwark
14th December 2017Bing Bing, Federico, Grace, Hannah, José, Jun, Karlene, Nada, Yiorgos.
/ Research and Interviews
Step 1: Literature Review• UK, London, and Southwark plans and policies
(general, and specific to Gypsies & Travellers)
• Reports, articles, and websites of Gypsy and
Traveller special interest groups, community
organisations, and other universities
Step 2: Meeting with Partners• Initial visit to Spring Tide Close
• Introduction and first planning
meeting with STAG
representatives
Step 3: Focus Groups, Site Visits and Semi-Structured Interviews• 1 interview with a female Traveller at the STAG office
• 1 focus group with 4 female Travellers in the Spring Tide
Close site
• 1 interview with a female housed Irish Traveller
• 6 interviews with Travellers in the Ilderton Road site (3 males
3 females)
• 1 interview with 2 STAG Trustees
Communal Spaces, Facilities, Services and Activities — Well Run, Accessible, Affordable and Relevant to
All
Lifetime neighbourhoods are the place where quality of
life and space intersect; where socio-spatial environmental
justice can be achieved.
An ideal site for gypsies and travellers in a lifetime
neighbourhood is one that has:
Homes That Meet Needs
Good Consultation, Democratic Accountability and Empowerment of Communities
3
1
2
Source: Just Space, 2016. Towards a Community Led Plan for London.
https://justspacelondon.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/just-space-a4-
community-led-london-plan.pdf
/ Lifetime Neighbourhoods
Recognition
“Family and caring for members of our family
are some of the most important things for us.”
“Children’s education was the main reason for
us to settle down.”
“Traveller life is still threatened. We still suffer
from discrimination such as in schools, church
and when booking weddings.”
“We need good quality communal spaces within
the site.”
/ Socio-Spatial Environmental Justice
Distribution
“We would like to live in
sustainable living spaces.”
“If you put all four sites in
Peckham together, it wouldn’t
make one proper site.”
“It would be nice to have fair
play between different people
who want somewhere to live.”
/ Socio-Spatial Environmental Justice
Recognition
Recognition
Participation
“No-one really listens to us
or tries to understand our
way of life.”
“Nobody consulted us about
what the temporary site
would look like.”
“There was someone from the
council who helped us but
they ‘let him go’.”
Distribution
/ Socio-Spatial Environmental Justice
Recognition
DistributionParticipation
Capacity to participate in
local decision-making
processes. (3)
Control over use of space on
site. (1)
Appropriate use of space/layout in the
site. (2)
Participation in identity-building cultural
activities. (1)
Sufficient number of
appropriately-sized
pitches. (2)
Access to non-
discriminatory health and
educational facilities. (1)
LifetimeNeighbourhoods
Definition: A commitment to redressing material inequalities through redistribution,
valuing diverse spatial practices and needs through recognition, and countering
exclusion and marginalisation through parity of participation.
Source: Fraser, N., 1996, “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition,
and Participation”, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Stanford University
/ Socio-Spatial Environmental Justice
Category 1 – Communal Spaces, Activities.
Category 2 – Homes that Meet Needs
Category 3 – Democratic Accountability
Thank you!
Jibril Maxamad, Viola Li,
Balint Horvath, Marwa
Barakat, Mateo Lu, Shiori
Sato, Tiara Sadikin,
Clementine Hugo-
Hamman, Tianyuan Weng
Local Business & Social Enterprise
Housing
Community Spaces
Pe
mP
eo
ple
SG Tenant Organisation Church
h
Feminist Library
❖
❖
❖
❖
❖
❖
❖
❖
❖
❖
❖
❖
❖
❖
❖
YES, BUT…
RE-DESIGN OF
INTERVENTION BY
COMMUNTIY
INSTITUTIONAL
FRAMEWORK
COMMUNITY
OTHER
STAKEHOLDERS
PARTICIPATORY
INDICATORS (NEEDS
AND PRIORITIES)
DIAGNOSIS (MEASURE
CURRENT LEVEL OF
JUSTICE)
ASSESSING
POTENTIAL IMPACT
DIAGNOSIS (MEASURE
CHANGE IN LEVEL OF
JUSTICE)
SCORECARD
SOCIAL
INFRASTRUCTURE AND
COMMUNITY ASSETS
IDENTIFY CONTEXT
DETERMINE BASELINE
CONDUCT ASSESSMENT OF
PROPOSED INTERVENTION
DECISION ON INTERVENTION
NO YES
MITIGATION PLAN (if any)
MONITORING
Existing Housing Provision
New Housing Provision
Irreplaceability
Green Spaces
Capacity to Remain
Quantity and Quality of Workspace Employment Support
ApprenticeshipsDisplacement
Rent Affordability
Cultural Identity
Maintenance
01 02 03 04
Activities link
to FS
Impacts
Related To
DRP
IndicatorsAffected
People
05
Determination
Of Collection
Scope
•
•
•
•
Proximity to one’s family
● Family members within shouting distance (Count)
● Average distance between family members
(Average)
Scoring for:
● Current situation (baseline)
● Future situation (impact)
Impact Score: The difference between the
current score and the projected score of the
intervention.
Which dimensions?
Which scores?Which data?
Which indicators?
3
2
4
1
Homes that meet needs
A decision-making tool...
...informed by the community
Generating:
● a combined impact score
● the number of areas of significant
negative impact
Prior to assessment and depending on the needs of
the community concerned:
● a different weighting of the indicators can
be applied
● the most crucial areas of impact can be
identified
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•