Date post: | 24-Jun-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | foro-abierto |
View: | 698 times |
Download: | 0 times |
PROGRESS REPORTSUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A.
Gestión sustentable
FSC (FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL)FSC (FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL)FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION PROCESSFOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION PROCESS
Sustainable management
Market Communication :Sustainability Certification / Responsible Management
Certifications
TRACK RECORD IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL, SSO AND SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT
OHSAS
18.001
1998 Signing of
Values CORMA
2003 Agreement signed with
NGOs2001 ISO 14001
Sustainable Forest
Management
Track record
Standards: CERTFOR
9 Principles
54 Criteria
193 Indicators
FSC10 Principles
56 Critera
215 Indicators
Standards: FSC
OUTLINE OF PROCESS FORFOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
1. Application2. Pre-audit
3. Establishment of Evaluation Team4. Public consultation of stakeholders5. Preparation: review of documentation6. Main evaluation7. Review (independent) and decision8. Certification
9. Follow-up Audit (annual)
Pre-Audit
Main Audit
Follow-up
SELECTION OF CERTIFICATION ENTITY
(WOODMARK)
SELECTION OF CERTIFICATION ENTITY
(WOODMARK)
PHASE ONE
7-15 SEP
PHASE ONE
7-15 SEP
PHASE TWO
26 OCT – 8 NOV
PHASE TWO
26 OCT – 8 NOV
• International Audit team and local experts
• Stakeholders’ interviews (42)
• Operations/sites visits (25) (Constitución, Chillán, Concepción, Arauco, Collipulli, Temuco, Valdivia)
• FSC Chile-Woodmark Meeting
• Weaknesses detected in the stakeholder consultation phase and deadline for completion is extended.
• Organization and implementation of phase two of pre-audit
• 137 stakeholders interviewed
FSC PRE-AUDIT 2009
Stakeholders Interviews
Provinces Interviews
Talca 4
Linares 1
Cauquenes 8
Ñuble 10
Concepción 17
Bio Bio 3
Arauco 20
Malleco 16
Cautín 11
Valdivia 46
Ranco 1
137
88
1717
4646
2020
44
11
11
1111
1616
33
1010
Stakeholder Consultation
FSC PRE-EVALUATION OF FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A., 2009Undertaken by Woodmark, Soil Association between 7 September and 8 November 2009
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS• Arauco has a very high and efficient technical
standards.
• Stakeholders are focused on social and environmental issues.
• Stakeholders do not differentiate between forest management and industrial operations (Cellulose).
• Many perceptions are based on past activities of the last 25 years.
FSC PRE-EVALUATION OF FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A., 2009Undertaken by Woodmark, Soil Association between 7 September and 8 November 2009
FSC PRE-EVALUATION OF FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A., 2009
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
KEY ISSUES TO DEAL WITH:
• Commitment with the community
• Native Forest Conversion/Restoration
• Landscape-Scale Planning and Design
Undertaken by Woodmark, Soil Association between 7 September and 8 November 2009
Woodmark’s checklist has a total of 293 indicators
Pre-Audit Final Report raised “findings” for 82 indicators (28%)
In a Main Audit, these “findings“ could be:
- "Preconditions"
- "Conditions“
- "Recommendations"
FSC PRE-EVALUATION OF FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A., 2009Undertaken by Woodmark, Soil Association between 7 September and 8 November 2009
Results
RELEVANT ISSUES Final Report
Findings CARs
1 Labor 3 1
2Consultation, Participation, Conflicts 9 7
3Indigenous Communities 11 10
4Social Impact Assessment 4 4
5Public information, Management Plan 8 5
6Contribution to local economies 2 1
7Replacement of Native Forest 2 1
8High Conservation Value Forests (BAVC) 3 3
9Landscape scale Management 9 10
10Soil and Water Management (Road Standards) 6 6
11Use of Chemical Products 3 2
12MFS Monitoring Systems and SGI Documentation 6 7
13Operational best practice (field) 16 11
82 68
A goal that was set: cross-board responsibility
Taking on a series of baseline criteria to deal with the process
F 1
F 2
F 3
F N
P1
P3
P2
The model: hybrid forums
BASE FORUMACTIVATION & METHODOLOGY
DEPLOYMENT OF FSC CONTROVERSIES
DIALOGUE
MAP OF CONTROVERSIES
Experts
StakeholdersCommunities
Actors internal and external
to the company
Results
RELEVANT ISSUES Final Report
Findings CARs
1 Labor 3 1
2Consultation, Participation, Conflicts 9 7
3Indigenous Communities 11 10
4Social Impact Assessment 4 4
5Public information, Management Plan 8 5
6Contribution to local economies 2 1
7Replacement of Native Forest 2 1
8Forests with High Conservation Value (BAVC) 3 3
9Landscape scale Management 9 10
10Soil and Water Management (Road Standards) 6 6
11Use of Chemical Products 3 2
12MFS Monitoring Systems and SGI Documentation 6 7
13Operational best practice (field) 16 11
82 68
WORK TEAMS FSC ISSUES
8 to 12 people
to be defined
Proposal of Thematic Forums (FH)
1 Labor (ILO Conventions 87 and 98)
2 Indigenous Communities
3 Socioeconomic Contribution to the Local Economy
4 Replacement of Native Forest(Nov 1994)
5 High Conservation Value Forests (BAVC) [ + wetlands ]
6 Landscape scale (size of stands, water, soil, esthetics…)
7 Soil and water management
FORUM MEMBERSEXPERTS
NON-EXPERTS
AFFECTED PARTIES
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOCIAL
ECONOMIC
FCEL
BASA
FVAL
FASA
BioforestARAUCO Corp
FSC BOARDCOMMITTEE
FOREST MANAGERS’ COMMITTEE
PROJECT’S EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
BASE FORUM
THEMATIC FORUMS (7)
TECHNICAL TEAMS (7)
211 Indicators without findings
IMPLEMENTATION TEAMS
TECHNICAL TEAMS (6)
16Indicators with
findings for direct implementation
30Indicators with
findings of a technical nature.
36Indicators with findings
of a socio-technical nature (controversies)
FSC PROJECT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
A “brand” for the process:
Communication
Communication and information platforms
Informative Bulletins
Communication
Thank you…