ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF ALCOHOL
INDUSTRY IN UTTAR PRADESH
DR. YASHPAL SINGHCHIEF ENVIRONMENT OFFICER
U.P. Pollution Control BoardLucknow,India
2
The Study TeamA. Coordination:
1. Dr. C.S.Bhatt, Member Secretary, UPPCB2. Dr. Yashpal Singh, Chief Environment Officer, UPPCB3. Er. Pradeep Sharma, Asstt. Environment Engr., UPPCB.
B. Study Executed by:
ENV Developmental Assistance Systems (INDIA) Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow. Experts:1. Er. T.N.Chaturvedi,
Professional & Chartered Engineer
2. Er. R.K.Bajaj,Environmental Engineer
C. Data Analysis & DTP1. Mr. T.Wilson, Data Analyst & DTP, DAS India.2. Mr. R.K.Bajpai, Data Entry Operator, UPPCB . Contd...
3
The Study Team (… contd.)
Our gratitude to:
Sri Pradeep Kumar The then Principal Secretary Environment and Chairman UP Pollution Control Board
For conceiving and designing the study and for his inspiring leadership and guidance.
Excise DepartmentGovt. of Uttar Pradesh.
For providing valuable data
Senior Officers of the U.P. Pollution Control Board
For their valuable inputs.
4
EVOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION• FIRST WAVE – THE TRADITIONAL REGULATORY APPROACH
• SECOND WAVE – MARKET BASED INSTRUMENTS
- POLLUTION CHARGES
- PRODUCT CHARGES
- USER FEE
- PERFORMANCE BONDS
- LIABILITY PAYMENTS
- NON COMPLIANCE FEES
- DEPOSIT REFUND SCHEME
- TRADEABLE PERMITS
• THIRD WAVE – PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
5
BENEFITS OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
• CREATION OF MARKET OPPORTUNITIES
• IMPROVEMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
• INCREASED CONFIDENCE OF INVESTORS, INSURERS AND
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
• IMPROVED RELATIONSHIP WITH LOCAL COMMUNITIES,
REGULATORS AND NON GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIIONS
•GREATER CONTROL OF ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE
•INCREASED STAFF COMMITTMENT
6
PRACTICED AS• Involuntary – Media Exposures, Notices, PIL Etc.
• Mandatory – The Regulatory Mechanism like consents
• Voluntary – Press Release, Public Reports Etc.
DRIVERS• Transparency
- Society Wants To Be Told What Is Going On
• Accountability
- Fear Of Losing Significant Economic Value Of
Good Corporate Reputation
• Synergy Between Economic And Environmental
Performance
7
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION• THE WATER (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION )
ACT, 1974 AS AMENDED IN 1988.
• THE WATER ( PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION)
CESS ACT, 1977 AS AMENDED IN 1991.
• THE AIR (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) ACT,
1981 AS AMENDED IN 1987.
• THE ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 1986
• THE PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE ACT, 1991
• THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL TRIBUNAL ACT, 1995
• THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY ACT,
1997
• NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY ACT, 2002
8
•INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM
- CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
- STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARDS
• INCENTIVES / DISINCENTIVES
- FINES
- BANK GUARANTEES
- CESS REBATE
- CONSENT VALIDITY
- LOCATION
- CLOSURES
- PROSECUTION
9
Environmental Performance Rating A Pioneering Initiative
U.P. Pollution Control Board, in a pioneering initiative is making efforts to change the paradigm of the way Pollution Control is commonly understood.
Dispel the notion that, Pollution Control is an end of process, cost-intensive, loss-making effort.
Rather, environmental management and pollution control means harmonizing resources, process and outputs.
10
Objectives of this Study To place a Mirror before the industry in the
form of Environmental Performance Rating to make them aware about their strengths and weaknesses as also the opportunities & threats, so as to enable self-correction and continual improvement in their environmental performance.
To encourage pro-active role by the Industry to improve its Environmental Performance through benchmarking.
11
Significance of Alcohol Industry Downstream unit of Sugar Industry- Synergy with
Sugar & Paper Utilising wastes (Molasses) to produce Alcohol, an
essential input of the Chemical & Pharmaceutical Industry and a product for human consumption.
Alcohol – great potential for use as Fuel for automobiles – GASOHOL.
But, also known for discharging highly polluted effluents and is included in ‘Schedule-1’ of Water Cess Act. An EIA is a pre-requisite before setting up of any unit or expansion thereof. (Contd…….)
12
Significance of Alcohol Industry (…. Contd.)
Significance in U.P.
Alongwith sugar, the largest value enhancer to agricultural produce.
Contributes a significant part of State GDP – next only to Trade Tax.
Major catalyst of Employment in the Primary & Secondary Sectors.
Unfortunately, also amongst the most polluting industries.
Over 10 MT of BOD load per day into the river systems of the State.
13
Alcohol Industry in Uttar Pradesh and Uttaranchal – a profile
No. of Distilleries in U.P. & Uttaranchal - 43 No. of Operational Distilleries - 37
No. of Molasses Based Distilleries - 35 No. of Grain Based Distilleries - 02 Units not operated in 2000-01 - 02
Total Annual Production Capacity of the Operational Distilleries - 6,79,777 KL Alcohol Production during 2000-01 - 4,32,489 KL
14
Analytical Framework and Methodology The basic hypothesis for this environmental
performance rating exercise has been: Optimal resource utilisation and improved
production processes are likely to result in better environmental performance.
Minimal but conscious efforts can result in achieving the environmental norms.
Therefore, the framework of the rating has three axes: Plant performance Regulatory compliance & Environmental initiatives
(Contd…...)
15
Analytical Framework and Methodology ( …. Contd.)
The study is based on data obtained from – The industry Excise Department U.P. Pollution Control Board
The study is diachronic & covers a span of three (3) years:
1998-99, 1999-2000 & 2000-01 and includes trend of
Performance
(Contd…...)
16
Analytical Framework and Methodology (…….Contd.)
Evaluation parameters identified. Basic data obtained from Industry on a customized
questionnaire. The Data received analyzed and clarifications obtained
from the units, as required. Consultants’ team visited Eight (8) Distillery units,
selected on geographical location and size, to verify credibility of the reported data on a sample basis.
Feedback taken from Senior Technical officers of UPPCB, during a series of presentations.
Authentication of the data, considered for calculating the environmental parameters, obtained from the top management of the distillery units. (Contd…...)
17
Analytical Framework and Methodology (…….Contd.)
Environmental parameters calculated for various units from the authenticated data obtained.
Latest (2000-01) performance & Trend analyzed. The two grain based units separately analyzed. Two (2) molasses-based units- one started in 2000-01 and the
other not worked during the year 2000-01, excluded. Draft Report prepared and presented to the industry in
an “Open-house (05.02.02)” for feedback, after which the final report with ratings, prepared.
Individual units informed about their environmental performance scores as well as the potential for cost savings through improvement - “Action Plans requested”
18
The Environmental Performance Criteria & Weightages Plant Level Performance (40%)
% utilization of installed production capacity (2+1) Raw Material, MT per KL Alcohol(5+1) Alcohol Recovery, Ltrs. Per MT TRS (3+1) Water Consumption, KL per KL Alcohol(10+1) Total Energy, GJ per KL Alcohol(4+1) % Renewable out of the Total Energy(4+1) Net External Energy, GJ per KL Alcohol(5+1)
(Contd…..)
19
The Environmental Performance Criteria & Weightages (……Contd.)
Regulatory Compliance Status (5%)
‘Consent’ – Water (2000) obtained from UPPCB(5 for yes, 0 for no)
‘Marginal’/’Heavy’ Default (without dilution) - UPPCB’ internal norms
- Negative Marking (Heavy –5; marginal –2) (Contd…..)
20
The Environmental Performance Criteria & Weightages (……Contd.)
Corporate & Environmental Management Aspects (55%)
ISO 14001 E M S (10 for yes; 0 for no) Completeness of ETP(10) Effluent Disposal Practice - Stream/Land or
Conversion into Bio-compost (10) Spent Wash generated, KL per KL Alcohol(10) Biogas generation, Nm3 per KL Spent Wash(15) Dilution Factor (-10)
21
Plant Level PerformanceCapacity Utilisation• Minimum -
2.90%• Maximum -
105.15%• Average - 64.56%• Mode - 73.50
Environmental Performance Evaluation
Capacity Utilisation,%
1 1
5
7
2
6
8
3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.90 - 15.68 15.68 - 28.46 28.46 - 41.24 41.24 - 54.03 54.03 - 66.81 66.81 - 79.59 79.59 - 92.37 92.37 -105.15
Range
No.
of U
nits
No. of Units with negative performance compared to modal value – 19
22
Plant Level PerformanceCapacity Utilisation – The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance Value (%)
Weighted Score (Performance + Trend)
1 Shamli Distly. & Chem. Works, Shamli, Muzaffarnagar
100.30 2.994
2 Rampur Distillery, Rampur 103.82 2.924 3 UDBL, Shekhpur, Unnao 105.15 2.897 4 Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd., Distlly, Simbhaoli,
Ghaziabad 92.25 2.845
5 Shadilal Distly. & Chem. Works, Muzaffarnagar
90.40 2.808
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance
Value (%) Weighted Score
(Performance + Trend) 29 Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun 46.74 0.935 30 Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala,
Meerut 46.52 0.930
31 Bajpur Coop. Sugar Factory, Bajpur, U.S.Nagar
39.94 0.799
32 Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut Cantt.
34.96 0.699
33 Kisan Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd., Kayamganj, Farrukhbad
02.90 0.058
23
Plant Level PerformanceMolasses Consumption, MT/KL Alcohol• Minimum -4.53• Maximum -6.28• Average -4.97• Mode - 4.97
No. of Units with negative performance compared to modal value – 14
Molasses, MT /KL Alcohol
910 10
1 10
1 1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
4.53 - 4.75 4.75 - 4.97 4.97 - 5.19 5.19 - 5.40 5.40 - 5.62 5.62 - 5.84 5.84 - 6.06 6.06 - 6.28
Range
No. o
f Uni
ts
24
Plant Level PerformanceMolasses Consumption - The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance Value (MT/KL)
Weighted Score (Performance + Trend)
1 UDBL, Shekhpur, Unnao 4.63 4.571 2 Balrampur Chini Mills, Balrampur 4.53 3.984 3 Bajaj Hindustan Ltd., Gola Gokaran Nath,
Kheri 4.57 3.817
4 UP State Sugar Coop. Fed. Ltd. Nanauta, Saharanpur
4.62 3.596
5 Kisan Sahakari hini Mills Ltd. (Distly.), Ghosi, Mau
4.63 3.543
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance
Value (MT/KL) Weighted Score
(Performance + Trend) 29 DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor 5.16 1.204 30 Narang Industries, Nawabgunj, Gonda 5.39 0.208
31 Mohan Meakins Ltd, Lucknow 5.59 0.000 32 Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut
Cantt. 6.03 0.000
33 Kisan Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd., Kayamganj, Farrukhbad
6.28 0.000
25
Plant Level PerformanceRecovery of Alcohol in Ltrs./MT. TRS
• Minimum -379.40• Maximum -536.78• Average -463.73• Mode - 467.93
No. of Units with negative performance compared to modal value – 13
Alcohol Recovery,Ltrs. /MT TRS Content
21
2
4
18
4
1 1
0
24
68
10
1214
1618
20
379.40 -399.08
399.08 -418.75
418.75 -438.42
438.42 -458.09
458.09 -477.76
477.76 -497.43
497.43 -517.11
517.11 -536.78
Range
No.
of U
nits
26
Plant Level PerformanceRecovery of Alcohol - The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance Value (Ltrs./MT)
Weighted Score (Performance + Trend)
1 Majhola Distly. & Chem. Works, Majhola, Pilibhit
536.78 3.372
2 Balrampur Chini Mills, Balrampur 509.28 1.989 3 Rampur Distillery, Rampur 490.27 1.724 4 Bajaj Hindustan Ltd., Gola Gokaran Nath,
Kheri 483.94 1.635
5 India Glycols Ltd., Kashipur, U.S.Nagar 482.36 1.613
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance Value (Ltrs./MT)
Weighted Score (Performance + Trend)
29 Modi Distly. Modinagar, Ghaziabad 435.73 0.963 30 Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun 427.44 0.847 31 Mohan Meakins Ltd, Lucknow 402.61 0.501 32 Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd,
Meerut Cantt. 387.88 0.295
33 Kisan Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd., Kayamganj, Farrukhbad
379.40 0.177
27
Plant Level PerformanceWater Consumption, KL / KL Alcohol
• Minimum - 14.69• Maximum -512.88• Average -125.22• Mode - 94.75
No. of Units with negative performance compared to modal value – 20
Water Consumption,KL /KL Alcohol
10
14
43
10 0
1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
14.69 - 76.96 76.96 - 139.24 139.24 -201.51
201.51 -263.79
263.79 -326.06
326.06 -388.33
388.33 -450.61
450.61 -512.88
Range
No.
of U
nits
28
Plant Level PerformanceWater Consumption- The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance Value (KL/KL)
Weighted Score (Performance + Trend)
1 Jubliant Organosys Ltd. (VAM Organics), Gajraula
14.69 8.027
2 Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd., Distlly, Simbhaoli, Ghaziabad
32.61 7.454
3 Somaiya Organics Ltd, Kushinagar 31.99 6.508 4 India Glycols Ltd., Kashipur, U.S.Nagar 48.27 6.079 5 Mohan Meakins Ltd, Mohan Nagar,
Ghaziabad 52.11 5.742
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance
Value (KL/KL) Weighted Score
(Performance + Trend) 29 Modi Distly. Modinagar, Ghaziabad 205.50 0.000 30 Saraiya Distilleries, Sardarnagar, GKP 206.08 0.000 31 DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor 237.84 0.000 32 Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala,
Meerut 283.79 0.000
33 Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut Cantt.
512.88 0.000
29
Plant Level PerformanceTotal Energy Consumption in GJ/KL Alcohol
• Minimum - 10.17• Maximum -123.56• Average - 26.04• Mode - 18.32
No. of Units with negative performance compared to modal value – 18
Total Energy Consumption, GJ /KL Alcohol
23
6
1 10
10
1
0
5
10
15
20
25
10.17 -24.34
24.34 -38.51
38.51 -52.69
52.69 -66.86
66.86 -81.04
81.04 -95.21
95.21 -109.38
109.38 -123.56
Range
No.
of U
nits
30
Plant Level PerformanceTotal Energy Consumption - The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance Value (GJ/KL)
Weighted Score (Performance + Trend)
1 Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun 11.98 3.757 2 Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala,
Meerut 13.33 3.424
3 Saraiya Distilleries, Sardarnagar, GKP 13.37 3.414 4 Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd., Distlly,
Simbhaoli, Ghaziabad 10.17 3.201
5 UDBL, Shekhpur, Unnao 15.18 2.971 The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance
Value (GJ/KL) Weighted Score
(Performance + Trend) 29 Modi Distly. Modinagar, Ghaziabad 26.70 0.000 30 DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor 31.25 0.000 31 Mohan Meakins Ltd, Mohan Nagar,
Ghaziabad 31.56 0.000
32 Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut Cantt.
56.02 0.000
33 Bajpur Coop. Sugar Factory, Bajpur, U.S.Nagar
81.19 0.000
31
Plant Level PerformanceTotal Renewable Energy % of Total Energy
• Minimum - 7.92• Maximum -100.00• Average - 79.51• Mode - 93.42
No. of Units with negative performance compared to modal value – 17
Renewable Energy %
2 2 1 20 1
5
20
0
5
10
15
20
25
7.92 -19.43
19.43 -30.94
30.94 -42.45
42.45 -53.96
53.96 -65.47
65.47 -76.98
76.98 -88.49
88.49 -100.00
Range
No.
of U
nits
32
Plant Level PerformanceTotal Renewable Energy- The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance Value (%)
Weighted Score (Performance + Trend)
1 Narang Industries, Nawabgunj, Gonda 100.00 4.999 2 DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor 100.00 4.999 3 Jubliant Organosys Ltd. (VAM Organics),
Gajraula 100.00 4.999
4 Somaiya Organics Ltd, Kushinagar 96.23 4.312 5 Bajaj Hindustan Ltd., Gola Gokaran Nath,
Kheri 99.66 3.936
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance
Value (%) Weighted Score
(Performance + Trend) 29 Saraiya Distilleries, Sardarnagar, Gorakhpur 77.86 0.000 30 Lords Distillery Ltd., Nandganj, Ghazipur 76.74 0.000 31 Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala,
Meerut 52.20 0.000
32 UDBL, Shekhpur, Unnao 25.59 0.000 33 Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut
Cantt. 11.31 0.000
33
Plant Level PerformanceNet External Energy in GJ / KL Alcohol
• Minimum - 0.00• Maximum -123.56• Average - 17.70• Mode - 9.44
No. of Units with negative performance compared to modal value – 21
External Energy Consumption,GJ / KL Alcohol
22
8
01
01
01
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.00 -15.44
15.44 -30.89
30.89 -46.33
46.33 -61.78
61.78 -77.22
77.22 -92.67
92.67 -108.11
108.11 -123.56
Range
No.
of U
nits
34
Plant Level PerformanceNet External Energy - The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance Value (GJ/KL)
Weighted Score (Performance + Trend)
1 Jubliant Organosys Ltd. (VAM Organics), Gajraula
0.00 6.000
2 Rampur Distillery, Rampur 3.26 4.963 3 Shamli Distly. & Chem. Works, Shamli,
Muzaffarnagar 4.01 4.725
4 KM Sugar Mills Ltd. (Distly.), Motinagar, Faizabad
4.05 4.713
5 Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd., Distlly, Simbhaoli, Ghaziabad
1.13 4.641
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance
Value (GJ/KL) Weighted Score
(Performance + Trend) 29 Modi Distly. Modinagar, Ghaziabad 17.63 0.000 30 DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor 19.69 0.000 31 Kisan Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd., Kayamganj,
Farrukhbad 22.08 0.000
32 Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut Cantt.
49.68 0.000
33 Bajpur Coop. Sugar Factory, Bajpur, U.S.Nagar
81.19 0.000
35
Regulatory ComplianceConsent Water Molasses Grain
Based Based• Consent Granted - 17 02• Consent Not Granted - 16 -
Water Consent19
16
02468
101214161820
Granted Not Granted
No.
of U
nits
36
Default Status (without dilution)
• Heavy Default - 22• Marginal Default - 11• Zero Discharge - 02
Regulatory Compliance
Default Status (without dillution)
22
11
2
05
10152025
Heavy Default Marginal Default Zero Discharge
No.
of U
nits
37
Environmental Management ISO 14001/EMS not granted to any Unit
Completeness of ETP
• In 2 Units, Primary (Biogas generation) stage not functional. In other 3 units, biogas not monitored & not consumed.
• 16 Units do not have the Second Aerobic Stage of the Secondary Treatment
• 2 Units are converting the entire effluent into Bio-manure
• 8 Units have started partly converting the effluent into Bio-manure
38
Environmental Management Spent Wash Generation in KL/KL Alcohol• Minimum - 10.87• Maximum - 38.34• Average - 15.48• Mode - 14.92
No. of Units with negative performance compared to modal value – 16
Spent Wash,KL / KL Alcohol
13
16
2
0 0 0 01
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
10.87 -14.31
14.31 -17.74
17.74 -21.17
21.17 -24.61
24.61 -28.04
28.04 -31.47
31.47 -34.90
34.90 -38.34
Range
No.
of U
nits
39
Environmental Management Spent Wash Generation - The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance Value (KL/KL)
Weighted Score
1 Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut Cantt.
10.87 7.995
2 DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor 11.36 7.517 3 KM Sugar Mills Ltd. (Distly.), Motinagar,
Faizabad 11.93 6.948
4 Balrampur Chini Mills, Balrampur 12.65 6.242 5 Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd. (Distly.),
Seohara, Bijnor 12.66 6.233
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance
Value (KL/KL) Weighted
Score 28 UPCSFF Ltd, Anoopshahar, Bulandshahar 16.13 2.800 29 Mohan Meakins Ltd, Lucknow 16.82 2.119 30 Bajpur Coop. Sugar Factory, Bajpur,
U.S.Nagar 19.34 0.000
31 Mohan Meakins Ltd, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad 20.58 0.000 32 Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun 38.34 0.000
40
Environmental ManagementBiogas Generation in Nm3 /KL Spent Wash• Minimum - 7.26• Maximum - 54.30• Average - 32.31• Mode - 32.38
No. of Units with negative performance compared to modal value – 16
Biogas, Nm3 / KL Spent Wash
1 1
3
6
9
1
3
2
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
7.26 -13.14
13.14 -19.02
19.02 -24.90
24.90 -30.78
30.78 -36.66
36.66 -42.54
42.54 -48.42
48.42 -54.30
Range
No. o
f Uni
ts
41
Environmental ManagementBiogas Generation - The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance Value (Nm3/KL)
Weighted Score
1 Jubliant Organosys Ltd. (VAM Organics), Gajraula
54.30 12.001
2 DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor 48.60 10.598 3 India Glycols Ltd., Kashipur, U.S.Nagar 47.48 10.321 4 Oudh Sugar Mills (Distly.) Hargaon 45.49 9.830 5 Rampur Distillery, Rampur 43.81 9.416
The Bottom Five (5) units, excluding those not having biogas generation facilities are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance
Value (Nm3/KL) Weighted
Score 22 Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala,
Meerut 23.73 4.469
23 Bajaj Hindustan Ltd., Gola Gokaran Nath, Kheri
23.31 4.365
24 UDBL, Shekhpur, Unnao 23.04 4.298 25 Majhola Distly. & Chem. Works, Majhola,
Pilibhit 18.95 3.291
26 Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun 07.26 0.408
42
Environmental ManagementDilution Ratio – KL Water/KL Treated Effluent
• Minimum - 0.31• Maximum - 44.81• Average - 7.88• Mode - 5.50
No. of Units with negative performance compared to modal value – 18
Dilution Ratio
1413
2 2
0 0 01
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0.31 - 5.87 5.87 -11.44
11.44 -17.00
17.00 -22.56
22.56 -28.12
28.12 -33.69
33.69 -39.25
39.25 -44.81
Range
No. o
f Uni
ts
43
Environmental ManagementDilution Ratio – The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance Value
Weighted Score
1 Jubliant Organosys Ltd. (VAM Organics), Gajraula
0.31 0.000
2 Somaiya Organics Ltd, Kushinagar 1.18 -2.000 3 Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd., Distlly, Simbhaoli,
Ghaziabad 1.49 -2.000
4 Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun 1.51 -2.000 5 Mohan Meakins Ltd, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad 1.62 -2.000
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery Performance
Value Weighted
Score 28 Modi Distly. Modinagar, Ghaziabad 11.86 -10.000 29 Saraiya Distilleries, Sardarnagar, GKP 14.59 -10.000 30 Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala,
Meerut 18.24 -10.000
31 DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor 19.50 -10.000 32 Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut
Cantt. 44.81 -10.000
44
• Minimum - -1.82• Maximum - 54.15• Average - 25.27• Mode - 26.17
Overall Environmental Performance(Molasses Based Units)
No. of Units with negative performance compared to modal value – 18
Overall Environmental Performance
3
5 5
9
5
3 3
0123456789
10
-1.82 -6.18
6.18 -14.17
14.17 -22.17
22.17 -30.16
30.16 -38.16
38.16 -46.16
46.16 -54.15
Range
No.
of U
nits
Mode - 26.17Average - 25.27
45
Conclusion1. Regional Comparison of Environmental Performance
Region No. of Units Performance Avg.Eastern 06 23.55Central 07 25.61Western 17 26.47Uttaranchal 03 21.14
Regional Comparision of Environmental Performance
23.5525.61 26.47
21.14
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Eastern Central Western Uttaranchal
Region
Envi
ronm
enta
l Per
form
ance
(A
vera
ge)
6 Un
its
7 Un
its
17 U
nits
3 Un
its
46
2. River Catchment-wise – No. of Distilleries
River Catchment Units Discharging Land disposal/ to River Bio-Composting
Ghagra 06 05 01Gomti 03 01 02Ganga 20 18 02Yamuna 06 06 -(Including 2 Grain Based distilleries)
River Catchmentwise Comparision - No. of Distilleries
6
3
20
6
1
18
65
0
5
10
15
20
25
Ghagra Gomti Ganga Yamuna
River Catchment
No. o
f Uni
ts
Total no. of Distlry.
No. discharging to River
47
3. Locational Comparison of Environmental PerformanceLocation No. of Units Performance Avg.Rural 23 24.90Semi Urban 02 29.97Urban 08 25.18
Locational Comparision of Environmental Performance(Molasses Based Units)
24.90
29.97
25.18
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
Rural Semi-Urban Urban
Location
Envi
ronm
enta
l Per
form
ance
(A
vera
ge)
23 U
nits
2 Un
its
8 Un
its
48
5. Environmental Performance vs Gross Profit
Gross Profit is directly proportional to Environmental Performance. (Available data for 14 units)Better the Environmental Performance, higher is the Profitability.
Gross Profit/KL Alcohol vs Environmental Performance(Molasses Based Units)
0500
1000150020002500
300035004000
45005000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Environmental Performance
Gro
ss P
rofit
/Uni
t
49
6. Better Environmental Performance of Grain Based Distilleries
• The environmental performance of Grain Based is better in comparison to molasses based distilleries
• Even Though their energy requirements are much higher.
• Notably, there is no recognition for IMFL as Whisky by WTO.
50
Savings’ Potential in the overall industry through improved environmental performance• Potential for annual cost savings on
achieving industry-best performance value:• Molasses Consumption : Rs. 26.95 Crores
• Water Consumption : Rs. 12.04 Crores
• Biogas Utilization : Rs. 22.50 Crores
• Reduction in Total Energy Consumption : Rs. 45.32 Crores
51
Recommendations1. Serious thinking required in respect of the bottom
five (5) units having alarmingly poor environmental performance with the consequent adverse environmental impacts.
2. Mandatory installation of Primary (Biogas) stage of effluent treatment in all the molasses-based plants to generate & utilize biogas as also its close monitoring and control. Retrofitting or replacement of inefficient plants to be carried out to achieve best performance.
3. Ensuring two stage aerobic treatment in Secondary stage of the Effluent Treatment Plant in all molasses-based units discharging into stream or land.
(Contd ……)
52
Recommendations
4. Minimizing water consumption by maximum recycling and reuse.
5. Installation of metering systems at identified locations for monitoring the consumption of Biogas, Water, Electricity & fuel.
6. Conversion of Spent Wash into bio-manure or cattle feed to be preferred disposal practice.
7. Energy Conservation training programs and periodic energy audits to identify and eliminate energy wastage and reduce energy consumption.
(Contd ……)
53
Recommendation (…….Contd.)
8. Maximum utilization of the treated effluent for irrigation, where bio-composting is not feasible.
9. Adoption of the best available technologies in the following areas, • Fermentation • Distillation • Co-generation of steam/power• Effluent Treatment
10. Upgradation of the Management through the implementation of :• ISO 14001 Environmental Management System• ISO 9001 Quality Management System
54
Overall Environmental Performance Rating(Molasses Based Units)
Sl. Name of Distillery Total Score (Max. Marks - 100)
1 Jubliant Organosys Ltd. (VAM Organics), Gajraula 54.1532 Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd., Distlly, Simbhaoli, Ghaziabad 50.6673 India Glycols Ltd., Kashipur, U.S.Nagar 47.9814 Rampur Distillery, Rampur 39.4605 Somaiya Organics Ltd, Kushinagar 39.3496 Bajaj Hindustan Ltd., Gola Gokaran Nath, Kheri 38.7587 DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor 37.5238 Oudh Sugar Mills (Distly.), Hargaon 36.6599 UDBL, Shekhpur, Unnao 36.278
10 Pilkhani Distly. & Chemical Works, Pilkhani, Dehradun 35.18211 Shamli Distly. & Chem. Works, Shamli, Muzaffarnagar 31.163
Contd …..
55
Overall Environmental Performance Rating(Molasses Based Units)
Sl. Name of Distillery Total Score (Max. Marks - 100)
12 Balrampur Chini Mills, Balrampur 29.72813 Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd. (Distly.), Seohara Bijnor 28.15114 Shadilal Distly. & Chem. Works, Muzaffarnagar 27.62015 Lords Distillery Ltd., Nandganj, Ghazipur 27.44416 KM Sugar Mills Ltd. (Distly.), Motinagar, Faizabad 26.07017 Saraiya Distilleries, Sardarnagar, GKP 24.73118 Mohan Meakins Ltd, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad 24.52819 Narang Industries, Nawabgunj, Gonda 23.94320 Kesar Enterprises Ltd, Baheri, Bareilly 23.66521 National Industrial Corp. Ltd., Raja-Ka-Sahaspur, Moradabad 22.12022 Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala, Meerut 21.858
Contd …..
…… Contd.
56
Overall Environmental Performance Rating(Molasses Based Units)
Sl. Name of Distillery Total Score (Max. Marks - 100)
23 Majhola Distly. & Chem. Works, Majhola, Pilibhit 18.25824 Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun 17.26625 Mohan Meakins Ltd, Lucknow 16.04926 SKS Chini Mills (Distly.), Nanpara, Bahraich 13.79827 Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut Cantt. 13.12428 Modi Distly. Modinagar, Ghaziabad 10.20829 UPCSFF Ltd, Anoopshahar, Bulandshahar 8.44530 Kisan Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd. (Distly.), Ghosi, Mau 6.25731 UP State Sugar Coop. Fed. Ltd. Nanauta, Saharanpur 3.84532 Kisan Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd., Kayamganj, Farrukhbad 1.51433 Bajpur Coop. Sugar Factory, Bajpur, U.S.Nagar -1.820
…… Contd.
57
PILOT PROGRAMME FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR INDUSTRIES
• PART OF WORLD BANK PROGRAMME
• SIMILAR IN DESIGN PRINCIPLES TO STUDIES IN
INDONESIA, CHINA AND PHILIPINES
• COLLECTIVE EFFORT OF CII, WORLD BANK AND
THE U.P. POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD.
58
• INITIATED IN MAY 2001
• COVERED 33 INDUSTRIES OF DIFFERENT SIZES AND
DIFFERENT SECTORS AT GHAZIABAD AND NOIDA
• CLASSIFIED BLACK, RED (IMPLYING LACK OF
COMPLIANCE) AND BLUE GREEN AND GOLD
(LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE MEETING EXISTING
STANDARDS)
• 6 RATED GOLD AND GREEN
• 16 RATED BLUE
• 11 RATED BLACK AND RED
59
PILOT INCLUDES• LOCATION SPECIFIC PROGRAMME
• INCLUDES SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISE ALSO
• INVOLVES A YES / NO
• COMPLIANCE RATING AS AGAINST PERFORMANCE
RATING
60
FUTURE OUTLOOK• DATA ACQUISITION SUCCESSFUL ONLY IF ASSISTED
BY REGULATORY AUTHORITIES.
• SEPARATE IDENTITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL RATING
PROGRAM
• INVOLVEMENT OF A MULTI STAKEHOLDER PANEL FOR
RATING VERIFICATION AND OVERSEEING THE RATING
PROCESS IS MUST
• INVOLVEMENT OF TECHNICAL EXPERTS
• INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL BACKING FOR THE PROJECT
• PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE DATA GENERATED BY THE
RATING PROCESS
• COMPLETE COOPERATION OF SPCB IS MUST.
61
CHARTER FOR CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY 2003BANK GUARANTEE AND ACTION PLAN TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY OR COMBINATION OF FOLLOWING MEASURES•COMPOST MAKING WITH PRESS MUD/AGRICULTURAL RESIDUE/MUNICIPAL WASTE
•CONCENTRATION AND DRYING / INCINERATION
•BIOMETHANATION, TWO STAGE SECONDARY TREATMENT AND DILUTION WITH PROCESS WATER FOR USE OF EFFLUENTS IN IRRIGATION
•BIOMETHANATION, SECONDARY TREATMENT AND CONTROLLED DISCHARGE INTO SEA.
•ONE TIME CONTROLLED APPLICATION ON LAND. STUDY IN THREE MONTHS.
62
ROAD MAP FOR ACHIEVING ZERO DISCHARGE IN INLAND SURFACE WATERS
• 50 % UTILIZATION OF SPENT WASH BY MARCH 2004
• 75% UTILIZATION OF SPENT WASH BY MARCH 2005
• 100 % UTILIZATION OF SPENT WASH BY DECEMBER 2005
NEW DISTILLERIES AND EXPANSION OF EXISTING DISTILLERIES
• NEW STAND ALONE DISTILLERIES AND EXPANSION OF EXISTING DISTILLERIES WITHOUT ACHIEVING ZERO DISCHARGE IN SURFACE/GROUND WATER NOT TO BE CONSIDERED
63
THANK YOU