+ All Categories
Home > Education > Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Date post: 21-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: john-degroote
View: 3,195 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
17
Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions Jan 17, 2014 Texas Bar CLE 12 th Annual Alternative Dispute Resolution Dallas, Texas
Transcript
Page 1: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC

Pragmatic Uses for DecisionTrees in Settlement Discussions

Jan 17, 2014

Texas Bar CLE • 12th Annual Alternative Dispute Resolution • Dallas, Texas

Page 2: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC 2

Today’s Roadmap

• Who

• What

• Why

• How

• …and More

Page 3: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC 3

If you and the other side value your case

differently, at least one of

you is wrong.

Make sureit isn’t you.

Page 4: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC 4

Who Makes Settlement Errors?

• One Study Concluded

• 61% of Plaintiffs Failed to Beat Last Offer

• Defendants Failed 24% of the Time

• Plaintiffs’ Mean Error Was $43,000

• Defendants’ Was $1,140,000

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 09/2008

-

The New York Times 08/2008

-

Page 5: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC

What Is a Decision Tree?

5

An illustration that shows the various possible outcomes

in a lawsuit and helps the parties

evaluate the costs, risks and benefits of each outcome.

““

- Daniel Klein

Page 6: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC

““

Why Do a Decision Tree?

Gut instinct, sloppy guesswork and grey hair no longer seem to be enough in complex, high

stakes mediation.

— Geoff Sharp, New Zealand Commercial Mediator and Barrister

Page 7: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC 7

Why Do a Decision Tree?

•“Probable”?

•Another Perspective• Events

• Contingencies

• Probabilities

• Timelines

• Costs

• Investment Analysis

Page 8: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC

Page 9: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC

Page 10: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC

How Do You Create a Decision Tree?

10

1 2 3 4

ListLitigation

Events

ConsiderCosts or

Gains of Each

Discount Eachby ProbabilityIt Will Occur

Do theMath

Image from ResolutionTree.com

Page 11: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC

Another Example

11

Page 12: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC 12

…and Just One More

Image © Litigation Risk Analysis, Inc.

Page 13: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC

Responding to the Naysayers

13

• They Objectify Litigation

• Not Everyone Is Rational

• The Parties Won’t Agree on a Number

• The Results Are Unreliable

• They Are Only for Commercial Cases

• Nobody Else Does Them

Page 14: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC

But Before You Go . . ..

14

Page 15: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC

John DeGrootePresident, John DeGroote Services, LLC

John DeGroote is a former global company general counsel now serving as a mediator, arbitrator and court-appointed trustee in significant disputes. He believes that hands-on leadership, early matter assessment, and aggressive project management drive results.Serves as the Liquidating Trustee to the BearingPoint, Inc. Liquidating Trust through John DeGroote Services, LLC.

Served from 2000 through 2008 as the Chief Litigation Counsel to KPMG Consulting/BearingPoint; eventually led a team of over 40 in-house lawyers around the globe as the Company's Chief Legal Officer from 2008 through late 2009, when he became the Company's President.

Previously practiced with the law firms of McKool Smith, P.C. and Jackson Walker, L.L.P., with a focus on complex technology, commercial, and intellectual property litigation matters against and for various Fortune 500 companies.

Currently serves as settlement counsel to select clients involved in significant disputes.

Received his mediation training from Pepperdine University's Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution in 2005. Has participated in over 200 mediations in approximately 20 states as a client executive, as outside or in-house counsel, and as a party.

Serves as a co-founder to online decision tree tool ResolutionTree.com and comments on litigation management, settlement techniques and negotiation strategies at settlementperspectives.com.

• J.D., Duke University School of Law, 1990

15

• B.A., Mississippi State University, 1986

Page 16: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC

slideshare.net/johndegroote

Hickory Street Annex501 S 2nd Avenue, Suite A-700Dallas, Texas 75226

[email protected]

johndegroote.com

(214) 887-3484

Page 17: Pragmatic Uses for Decision Trees in Settlement Discussions

Copyright © 2014 John DeGroote Services, LLC 17


Recommended