1
Prairie HydrologyPrairie Hydrology
John Pomeroy, Xing Fang, Robert Armstrong, John Pomeroy, Xing Fang, Robert Armstrong, Tom Brown, Kevin ShookTom Brown, Kevin Shook
Centre for Hydrology, Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
Climate Change for the Prairies?• Highly variable and harsh
climate has limited settlement and development possibilities over the last century.
• If weather variability increases, this could degrade the viability of many aspects of ecosystems, human activities and economy
• However, moderation of some variability (less cold or dry weather) might open up new possibilitiesfor the Prairies
2
Prairie Climate is Variable and Extreme
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
Year
Air Temperature C
April Average Temperature, Saskatoon
Drought 1999-2004
3
THE DIRTY THIRTIES
"Saskatchewan,
Saskatchewan, there's
no place like
Saskatchewan; we sit
and gaze across the
plains and wonder why
it never rains…"
These words from the
song Saskatchewan
were written during the
1930s.
Prairie Snow
4
Prairie Rain
Fishing Lake Flooding, Spring 2007
5
North American Regional PredictionsClimate Difference from 1980-1999 to 2080-2089
A1B – balanced scenario
IPCC 2007
Prairie Hydrology• Major river flow is primarily from mountain runoff, but prairie
runoff supplies smaller rivers, streams, wetlands, and lakes
• Prairie Runoff – forms in internally drained (closed) basins that are locally important but
non-contributing to river systems that drain the prairies, OR
– drains directly to small prairie rivers (Battle, Souris, Assiniboine) >80% of runoff during snowmelt period
• Redistribution of snow to wetlands and stream channels in winter is critical to formation of runoff contributing area
• Drainage of small streams and wetlands ceases completely in summer when actual evaporation* consumes most available water.
• Baseflow from groundwater often nonexistent.
• Prairie streams are almost completely ungauged and often altered by dams, drainage, water transfers, etc
*evaporation used here as transpiration + evaporation + sublimation
6
Prairie Runoff Generation
Snow Redistribution to Channels
Spring melt and runoff
Water Storage in Wetlands
Dry non-contributing areas to runoff
PRAIRIE HYDROLOGY – Limited
Contributing Areas for Streamflow
Non-contributing areas for streamflow
extensive in Canadian Prairies
Localized hydrology
affected by poor drainage,
storage in small
depressions
7
Prairie Hydrology – don’t blink
0
5
10
15
20
25
01-J
an
31-J
an
02-M
ar
01-A
pr
01-M
ay
31-M
ay
30-J
un
30-J
ul
29-A
ug
28-S
ep
28-O
ct
27-N
ov
27-D
ec
Streamflow m
3 per second
Average 1975-2006
1995 High Year
2000 Low Year
Smith Creek, Saskatchewan
Modelling Prairie Hydrology
• Need a physical basis to calculate the effects of
changing climate, land use, drainage
• Need to incorporate key prairie hydrology
processes: snow redistribution, frozen soils,
spring runoff, wetland fill and spill, non-
contributing area
• Frustration that hydrological models developed
elsewhere do not have these features
8
Cold Regions Hydrological
Modelling Platform: CRHM • Modular – purpose built from C++ modules
• Modules based upon +45 years of prairie hydrology research at Univ of Saskatchewan
• Hydrological Response Unit (HRU) basis – natural landscape units with horizontal interaction, ponds, no need for stream
• HRUs assumed to represent one response type, basis for coupled energy and mass balance
• HRUs connected aerodynamically for blowing snow and via dynamic drainage networks for streamflow
• Incorporate wetlands directly using fill and spill algorithm
CRHM Module Development
• Data interpolation to the HRUs
• Infiltration into soils (frozen and
unfrozen)
• Snowmelt (prairie & forest)
• Radiation – level, slopes
• Evapotranspiration
• Snow transport
• Interception (snow & rain)
• Sublimation (dynamic & static)
• Soil moisture balance
• Pond water balance
• Sub-surface runoff
• Routing (hillslope & channel)
DATA
ASSIMILATION
SPATIAL
PARAMETERS
• Basin and HRU parameters
are set. (area, latitude,
elevation, ground slope,
aspect)
PROCESSES
9
Prairie Hydrology Studies
Smith Creek:
sub-humid,
wetland
dominated,
variable
contributing area
St Denis:
sub-humid
internally drained
non-contributing
zone
Bad Lake IHD:
semi-arid,
well drained
Lethbridge
Ameriflux
Station:
semi-arid
Drought and
Climate
Change
Studies
• Creighton
Tributary of Bad
Lake
-well drained
semi-arid upland
• St. Denis
National
Wildlife Area
-internally
drained sub-
humid upland
10
Spatially Distributed Snow Redistribution
Snow mass balance equation
St Denis, Saskatchewan
Results – Spatially distributed SWE
Fang and Pomeroy, Hydrol Proc, 2009
11
Spatially distributed SWE cont’
Spatially distributed SWE cont’
12
Spatially distributed SWE cont’
Spatially distributed SWE cont’
13
CRHM HRU Configurations
Fallow Stubble
Grass Coulee
Stream
Creighton Tributary, Bad Lake
Cultivated
Wooded Wetland
Pond
Wetland 109, St Denis
Prairie wheat field snow accumulation test
Water Balance Creighton-Stubble 1981/82
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
10-Nov 20-Dec 29-Jan 10-Mar 19-Apr
mm
CRHM Runoff
CRHM Snowfall
CRHM Infiltration
CRHM M elt
CRHM Ground SWE
M easured M elt
M easured SWE
14
Snowmelt Runoff Test at Bad Lake
Snow Accumulation in Drought and Wet Years at
Wetland 109, St Denis
15
Effect of Warmer Winter on Blowing Snow and Snow
Accumulation – Bad Lake
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
01/10/1974 31/10/1974 30/11/1974 30/12/1974 29/01/1975 28/02/1975 30/03/1975 29/04/1975
mm water equivalent
SWE (Normal)
SWE(5 C Rise in Temp)
Sublimation (Normal)
Sublimation (5 C Rise in Temp)
Fang and Pomeroy, 2007
Effect of Drier Winter on Blowing Snow and
Snow Accumulation – Bad Lake
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
01/10/1974 31/10/1974 30/11/1974 30/12/1974 29/01/1975 28/02/1975 30/03/1975 29/04/1975
mm water equivalent
SWE (Normal)
SWE(50% Decrease in Snowfall)
Sublimation (Normal)
Sublimation (5 0% Decrease in
Snowfall)
16
Cold Season Hydrology –
Bad Lake Climate Sensitivity Test
Drought Factors
-Winter Precipitation
-Winter Air
Temperature
-Fall Soil Moisture
-Summer Vegetation
Growth
Drought Response
-Winter Evaporation
-Maximum Snowpack
-Spring Infiltration
-Spring Stream
Discharge
Fang and Pomeroy, 2007
Snowmelt Runoff over Frozen Soils
Bad Lake:
Semi-arid
SW Saskatchewan
Soil moisture is
FALL soil moisture
Snowmelt runoff is
Spring
Physically based
Infiltration equations
(Zhao & Gray, 1999)
Cold Regions
Hydrological Model
17
Prairie Streamflow and Climate Change
First more, then less?• Toyra et al. 2004: median of three most reliable
climate change scenarios suggests increases in annual prairie winter temperature and precipitation from the 1961-1990 average:
– 2050 +2.6 ºC and +11%
– 2080 +4.7 ºC and +15.5%
• Using this scenario in Bad Lake Research Basin (SW Sask) with CRHM results in a 24% rise in 2050 spring runoff, but a 37% drop by 2080, compared to the basin runoff (54 mm) in spring of 1975 (Fang and Pomeroy, 2007).
Climate Change – Winter Snow
Winter Snow Accumulation at Bad Lake, SK
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
01/1
0/1
974
15/1
0/1
974
29/1
0/1
974
12/1
1/1
974
26/1
1/1
974
10/1
2/1
974
24/1
2/1
974
07/0
1/1
975
21/0
1/1
975
04/0
2/1
975
18/0
2/1
975
04/0
3/1
975
18/0
3/1
975
01/0
4/1
975
15/0
4/1
975
29/0
4/1
975
SWE (mm)
Normal SWE (Winter of 1974/75)
SWE (Winter of 2049/50)
SWE (Winter of 2079/80)
18
Climate Change – Spring Runoff
Spring Runoff from Creighton Tributary at Bad Lake, SK
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
7001/1
0/1
974
15/1
0/1
974
29/1
0/1
974
12/1
1/1
974
26/1
1/1
974
10/1
2/1
974
24/1
2/1
974
07/0
1/1
975
21/0
1/1
975
04/0
2/1
975
18/0
2/1
975
04/0
3/1
975
18/0
3/1
975
01/0
4/1
975
15/0
4/1
975
29/0
4/1
975
Runoff (mm)
Normal Spring Runoff (Spring of 1975)
Spring Runoff (Spring of 2050)
Spring Runoff (Spring of 2080)
Soil Moisture, Evaporation and Runoff
• Should be Easy! If R = 0, then P = E
• Not that easy….. – E = P - ∆S This is when sub-surface coupling becomes critical to the
atmosphere
– Storage is dynamic during dry periods. Decreasing surface area of open water, increased root depths, increased depth to water table
– Seasonality –• most runoff is from snowmelt (snowfall),
• most evaporation is from rainfall + snowmelt
• Precipitation or melt at times of low evaporative energy goes into storage (including soil moisture) or runoff
– Episodic Events – runoff removes water before it can infiltrate and form storage for evaporation.
• Snowmelt over frozen soil
• Intense rainfall rates (convective storms).
19
Simulation in a Dry Period
Rainfall Evaporation
Recharge Zone
Soil
Groundwater
Interception/PondingSurface
Runoff
Sub-surface
Runoff
Groundwater
Flow
CRHM: Cold Regions Hydrological Model
Infiltration
cum_soil_runof f (1)������
cumhru_rain(1)������
hru_cum_actet(1)������
soil_mois t(1)������
The Cold Regions Hydrological Model Platform 2006
C:\CRHM\Bad_DLL_7374_pas ture.prj
29/08/197414/08/197430/07/197415/07/197430/06/197415/06/197431/05/1974
(mm
)
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Page 1 of 1
P>E
R > 0
S little change
Energy control on
evaporation
No Drought
20
cum_soil_runof f (1)������
cumhru_rain(1)������
hru_cum_actet(1)������
soil_mois t(1)������
The Cold Regions Hydrological Model Platform 2006
C:\CRHM\Bad_DLL_7374_pasture.prj
29/08/197414/08/197430/07/197415/07/197430/06/197415/06/197431/05/1974
(mm
)
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Page 1 of 1
P/3
T + 3 oC
R = 0
E > P
S declines
Plant, roots and
soil moisture
Become important
Early Drought
cum_soil_runof f (1)������
cumhru_rain(1)������
hru_cum_actet(1)������
soil_mois t(1)������
The Cold Regions Hydrological Model Platform 2006
C:\CRHM\Bad_DLL_7374_pasture.prj
29/08/197414/08/197430/07/197415/07/197430/06/197415/06/197431/05/1974
(mm
)
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Page 1 of 1
P/3
T + 3 oC
Si/4
R = 0
E ≈ P
S depleted
Soil moisture
critical and limiting
Full Drought
21
Lethbridge Ameriflux Site (2001)
Synthetic Drought Progression
0390Runoff
+14-28-18Storage
Change
61100150Evaporation
7575222Rainfall
Full Drought1st SummerNo Drought
mm of water
22
Smith Creek Hydrology Study
• Problem: Inability to reliably model the basins of the Upper Assiniboine River and other prairie basins where variable contributing area, wetlands, nonsaturatedevaporation, frozen soils, snow redistribution and snowmelt play a major role in hydrology.
• Objectives– Develop a Prairie Hydrological Model computer program that
can simulate the response of streams, wetlands, and soil moisture to weather inputs for various basin types.
– Evaluate the model performance in Smith Creek by comparing to observations of streamflow, wetland extent, and snowpack.
– Use the Prairie Hydrological Model to estimate the sensitivity of streamflow, wetland water storage, and soil moisture to changes in drainage and land use.
Instrumentation of Smith Creek
Hydrometeorological Station
11 dual rain gauges
7 wetland level recorders
Completed
Summer 2007
23
Main Hydrometeorological StationTemperature, humidity, wind
speed, shortwave radiation,
longwave radiation, soil
moisture, soil temperature
soil heat flux, snow depth,
rainfall, snowfall
Telemetry of Hydrometeorological Data
to Website – community accessTelemetry to U of Sask website
http://www.usask.ca/hydrology
24
Snow and Wetland Surveys
Streamflow over Time
Smith Creek Annual Streamflow
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
25000000
30000000
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Annual Streamflow (m
3)
Top 4 years for streamflow since 1995
25
Peak Flow over Time
Maximum Daily Discharge of Smith Creek during 1975-2006
0
5
10
15
20
25
19
75
19
77
19
79
19
81
19
83
19
85
19
87
19
89
19
91
19
93
19
95
19
97
19
99
20
01
20
03
20
05
Maxim
um Daily Discharge (m
3/s)
Top 6 peak daily flows since 1995
Changing Climate?Mean Annual Air Temperature at Yorkton
y = 0.0239x + 1.4259
R2 = 0.0404
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Mean Annual Temperature (°C
)
Annua l R a in fa ll an d Snow fa ll a t Yo rk to n
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Rainf a ll (mm)
Snow f a ll (mm)
Warming but high variability
No trend in
rainfall and snowfall
26
Drainage of Wetlands?
Drainage of Wetlands?
27
Modelling Approach
Smith Creek Basin CharacteristicsDrainage Network Spot Image
28
CRHM – Prairie Hydrological Model Configuration
Flow Chart in Cold Regions
Hydrological Model Platform
(CRHM)
HRU Configuration for Smith Creek
29
Parameterisation
without Calibration:
LiDAR DEM to Calculate
Depression Storage
Derivation of Wetland Depressions
for Basin
30
SCR-9
SCR-8LR-5
LT-2/SCR-4
SCR-9
SCR-8LR-5
LT-2/SCR-4
SCR-9SCR-9
SCR-8SCR-8LR-5LR-5
LT-2/SCR-4LT-2/SCR-4
Remote Sensing Supervised Classification
CRHM Tests Smith Creek – No CalibrationObse rved SWE vs Simulated SWE at Smith Creek Sub-basin 1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
7-Feb 18-Feb 29-Feb 11-Mar 22-Mar 2-Apr 13-Apr
2008
Snow Accumulation
(mm SWE)
Fallow Obs. SWE Fallow Sim. SWE
Channel Obs. SWE Channel Sim. SWE
Wetland Obs. SWE Wetland Sim. SWE
Volumetric Soil Moisture at Smith Creek during Spring Snowmelt
Pe riod
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
22-Mar 31-Mar 9-Apr 18-Apr 27-Apr 6-May
2008
Volumetric Soil
Moisture
Observed
Simulated
31
Runoff Prediction:
No LiDAR & Calibration = old basin
LiDAR & No Calibration = new basin
Smith Creek Discharge with LiDAR Uncalibrated and
No LiDAR Calibrated Parameters
Conclusions
• Possible to model Prairie hydrology without calibration using physically based landscape scale simulations.
• Prairies are expected to become warmer and wetter with an initial increase in spring runoff followed by a substantial decrease in spring runoff generation later in the 21st Century.
• Drought sensitivity is extreme which will lead to magnification of drought-wet cycles in streamflow responses.
• Drainage is increasing streamflow and peak flow in wet and normal years