Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement
Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5
Prepared For:
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest
1101 Tautog Circle
Silverdale, WA 98315-1101
Contract N44255-15-D-0002
Purchase Order No. MOMS00007451696
August 4, 2017
Kane Environmental Project Number: MOMS7451696 Prepared By: Kane Environmental, Inc. 3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 Seattle, WA 98103 ________________________ _________________________ Nathan Evenson John Kane, LHG Project Geologist Principal, President
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ III
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ ES-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................ 1
2.0 FIELD METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Sampling Station Locations ............................................................................................................ 3
2.2 Sediment Sample Collection .......................................................................................................... 3
2.3 Equipment Decontamination .......................................................................................................... 4
3.0 ANALYTICAL METHODS ................................................................................................................. 5
3.1 Laboratory QA/QC Procedures ...................................................................................................... 5
3.2 Data Validation ............................................................................................................................... 5
4.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................... 6
4.1 Field Observations .......................................................................................................................... 6
4.2 Laboratory Analysis and Data Quality ............................................................................................ 6
4.2.1 Particle Size ................................................................................................................................ 6
4.2.2 Total Organic Carbon .................................................................................................................. 7
4.2.3 Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls ......................................................................................................... 7
4.2.4 Metals .......................................................................................................................................... 8
5.0 DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................................... 9
6.0 LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 10
7.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 11
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
FIGURES
Figure 1 – Vicinity Map
Figure 2 – Study Area Plan
Figure 3 – Dry Dock 3 Sample Locations
Figure 4 – Dry Dock 1 Sample Locations
Figure 5 – Dry Dock 2 Sample Locations
Figure 6 – Dry Dock 4 Sample Locations
Figure 7 – Dry Dock 5 Sample Locations
TABLES
Table 1 – Summary of Summary of Sediment Sampling Field Observations
Table 2 – Summary of Sediment Sample Grain Size
Table 3 – Summary of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and Total Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in
Sediment
Table 4 – Summary of Metals in Sediment
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A – Sample Chain-Of-Custody Forms
Attachment B – Laboratory Analytical Reports
Attachment C – Data Validation Report
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
iii
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
bsf below sea floor cm centimeters CSL Cleanup Screening Levels EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology EDD Electronic Data Deliverable PDF Portable Document Format GPS Global Positioning System mg/kg milligrams per kilogram mg/kgOC milligrams per kilogram of organic carbon MS matrix spike MSD matrix spike duplicate NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command NBK Naval Base Kitsap OU Operable Unit PCBs poly-chlorinated biphenyls PSNS Puget Sound Naval Shipyard QA Quality Assurance QC Quality Control RPD relative percent difference SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan SCO Sediment Cleanup Objective SMS Washington State Sediment Management Standards TOC total organic carbon μg/kg micrograms per kilogram WAC Washington State Administrative Code wt% weight percent
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
ES-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Kane Environmental, Inc. (Kane Environmental) has completed a sediment sampling scope of work in the
waterfront area of Naval Base Kitsap (NBK)-Bremerton and Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS) in
accordance with the approved Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) (Kane Environmental and Naval Facilities
Engineering Command Northwest [NAVFAC NW], 2016). This sample collection was conducted within
Operable Unit (OU) B Marine of the PSNS Complex Superfund Site. Samples were collected near buried
subaqueous sections of the saltwater distribution system piping located immediately to the south of dry
docks 1 through 5. These sections of subaqueous buried piping are planned for replacement from Summer
2017 to Spring 2018. This sampling was completed in accordance with an agreement between the Navy
and stakeholders. This scope of work was completed to establish pre-construction concentrations of metals
and poly-chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in sediment adjacent to the area that will be disturbed during
saltwater piping replacement activities. Following completion of construction activities related to piping
replacement, a second round of sediment samples will be collected from the sampling stations sampled as
part of this scope of work in order to assess any impacts that the construction activities may have had on
sediment quality. In addition, information gathered during this scope of work will be provided to the
construction contractor to aid in determination of the practices that should be used when dredging, handling,
and disposing of the sediments removed during construction activities.
Following the completion of a SAP and project coordination tasks, Kane Environmental and NAVFAC NW
staff worked with the PSNS divers to collect sediment samples for laboratory analysis from fifteen waterfront
locations adjacent to buried subaqueous piping located south of dry docks 1 through 5. Each of these
sediment samples was submitted for laboratory analysis for determination of particle size distribution and
concentrations of total organic carbon (TOC), PCBs, and metals in accordance with the approved SAP.
Concentrations of metals and PCBs measured in sediment samples are compared to the Marine Sediment
Cleanup Screening Level (CSL) and Sediment Cleanup Objective (SCO) concentrations set forth in the
Washington State Sediment Management Standards (SMS). Results indicate that sediment collected from
most sampling stations contains mercury at concentrations exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment CSL and
SCO, and sediment from some sampling stations contains concentrations of other metals and PCBs
exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment CSL.
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Kane Environmental, Inc. (Kane Environmental) has completed a scope of work that included the collection
of sediment samples for laboratory analysis from fifteen locations adjacent to dry docks 1 through 5 along
the waterfront area of PSNS at NBK-Bremerton. A vicinity map showing the location of the sampling area
is shown in Figure 1, and an aerial photograph overview of the sampling area is shown in Figure 2. Figures
3 through 7 show the sampling locations.
1.1 Background
Sediment sampling was conducted within Operable Unit (OU) B Marine of the PSNS Complex Superfund
Site. Samples were collected near buried subaqueous sections of the saltwater distribution system piping
located immediately to the south of dry docks 1 through 5, which are planned for replacement from Summer
2017 to Spring 2018. This sampling was completed in accordance with the approved SAP. The sections of
existing subaqueous buried saltwater pipe scheduled for replacement are located between approximately
17 and 70 feet from the current dry dock 1 through 5 caissons. Approximate locations of sections of buried
saltwater pipe scheduled for replacement as part of this project are shown in Figures 3 through 7.
This scope of work was completed to establish pre-construction concentrations of metals and PCBs in
sediment adjacent to the area that will be disturbed during saltwater piping replacement activities. Following
completion of construction activities related to piping replacement, a post-construction round of sediment
sampling will be completed at the same sampling locations sampled as part of this scope of work, in order
to assess any impacts that the construction activities may have had on surface sediment quality.
1.2 Scope of Work
Under Purchase Order #MOMS00007451696 of Contract N44255-15-D-0002, Kane Environmental was
contracted by Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest (NAVFAC NW) to complete a scope of
work that included the following tasks:
Sampling and Analysis Plan: Kane Environmental and NAVFAC NW co-authored a Sampling
and Analysis Plan (SAP) that was reviewed by the Site stakeholders.
Equipment Rental: Kane Environmental coordinated rental of sediment samplers for collection of
sediment samples.
Sample Collection: Kane Environmental and NAVFAC NW worked with the PSNS Divers to collect
sediment samples from 15 sampling stations along the waterfront area of PSNS. As part of
sampling, Kane Environmental and NAVFAC NW collected field observations regarding sampling
activities, conditions at each sampling location, and to the physical properties of the sampled
sediments.
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
2
Laboratory Analysis: Sediment samples were submitted to the ALS Environmental (ALS)
laboratory location in Kelso, Washington, for Particle Size Determination Analysis by ASTM Method
D422 (Expanded Breakout). Sediment samples were submitted to Analytical Resources,
Incorporated (ARI) in Tukwila, Washington, for the following analyses:
o Total Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Silver, and Zinc by EPA Method
6010C
o Total Mercury by EPA Method 7471B
o Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by EPA Method 8082A
o Total Organic Carbon (TOC) by the Plumb, 1981 method
Data Validation: Kane Environmental retained EcoChem, Inc. (EcoChem) to provide an
independent Data Validation Report assessing the quality of the PCBs and metals results. TOC
and particle size data validation was not included as part of this scope of work.
Sampling Report: Kane Environmental prepared this report, including all tables and figures,
summarizing the results of pre-construction sediment sampling activities.
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
3
2.0 FIELD METHODOLOGY
Collection of sediment samples was conducted in cooperation with the PSNS Divers, from aboard a Navy
sampling vessel. Descriptions of the methodologies used in the field are described in the subsections below.
2.1 Sampling Station Locations
The locations of sections of buried saltwater distribution system piping relative to fixed points (dry dock
walls and caissons) were determined prior to sampling by NAVFAC NW. The planned locations of sampling
stations were established by NAVFAC NW approximately 15 feet south of the mapped locations of buried
sections of saltwater distribution system piping. This distance was based on the maximum buried depths
of the piping sections (10 to 15 feet) and the assumed slope of the zone of sediment that would be disturbed
during replacement of the piping. The locations of sampling stations were set in the field by using
measurement tapes or lines attached to fixed features on the dry docks and caissons to position the
sampling vessel over each sampling location. Notes detailing the measurement points were recorded for
use during post-construction sediment sampling. Once positioned, a marker buoy attached to an anchor
line was dropped from the sampling vessel. Line lengths were adjusted in an attempt to minimize the extent
to which the buoys drifted from their location above the sampling location. A GPS unit on the sampling
vessel was used to collect a GPS point at the location of each marker buoy. Sampling station location
information is included in Table 1, locations of sampling stations based on field measurements are shown
in Figures 3 through 7.
2.2 Sediment Sample Collection
Divers used handheld, decontaminated stainless-steel-construction box samplers to collect grab samples
from each sampling station, as marked by the anchors of the marker buoys. Divers inserted samplers into
the sediment at an approximately 90-degree angle, and pushed the samplers at least 12 centimeters (cm)
into the sediment. Following insertion of the sampler into the sediment, the diver engaged the bottom trap
mechanism, placed the cover on the top of the sampler, and returned the sampler to the sampling vessel.
During sampling, the diver reported observations regarding the substrate and depth of water at the sampling
station to staff onboard the sampling vessel. Depths of water recorded by divers at each sampling station
are listed in Table 1.
The time that the sampler was brought onboard was noted, and the sampler was inspected by Kane
Environmental staff for evidence of sediment loss and the depth of sampler penetration was recorded (time
and penetration depth for each sample is listed in Table 1). Kane Environmental staff used a
decontaminated stainless steel trowel and fresh nitrile-gloved hands to remove the upper 10 cm of sediment
not in contact with the walls of the sampler and placed this material in a decontaminated stainless steel
bowl. Large objects not representative of the overall sample (such as large organisms or rocks) were
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
4
removed from the sample as appropriate, and the sediment characteristics were logged. Sample
characteristics and a description of any materials removed from samples are provided in Table 1.
Following sample logging, a mechanical mixer with a decontaminated mixing paddle was used to mix the
sample material in the bowl for approximately five minutes, until homogenized. Sample material was then
transferred to sampling containers provided by the analytical laboratories. These containers were labeled
with the sample ID (assigned in accordance with the SAP), time and date of sample collection, and
requested analysis. At select sampling locations, field duplicate samples were also collected and submitted
for laboratory analysis, in accordance with the laboratory analytical plan described in the SAP. Sampling
containers filled with sediment were placed in ice-filled coolers and held at temperatures below four degrees
Celsius until they were delivered to the analytical laboratories. Sediment samples were delivered to the
analytical laboratories under standard chain-of-custody procedures. For the samples delivered to ALS, this
included transport by a commercial delivery service in a cooler sealed with custody seals. Samples were
received by ALS with all custody seals intact, and with samples within acceptable temperature limits. Copies
of sample chain-of-custody forms are included in this report as Attachment A.
2.3 Equipment Decontamination
Sediment samplers and other sampling tools were decontaminated between use with each sediment
sample using an Alconox detergent-distilled water solution and plastic-bristle scrubbing brushes. Following
decontamination, sampling equipment was rinsed with distilled water and with site water. Wash water was
disposed of following completion of sampling in accordance with the SAP.
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
5
3.0 ANALYTICAL METHODS
Sediment samples were submitted to the ALS Environmental laboratory in Kelso, Washington and the ARI
laboratory in Tukwila, Washington. The following analyses were conducted on submitted samples:
Particle Size Determination Analysis by ASTM Method D422 (Expanded Breakout)
Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Silver, and Zinc by EPA Method 6010C
Mercury by EPA Method 7471B
PCBs by EPA Method 8082A
TOC by the Plumb, 1981 method.
All analyses were performed in accordance with the ALS and ARI in-house Quality Assurance/Quality
Control Plans and the procedures described in the SAP. Sample analyses were performed in compliance
with EPA analytical methods and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) guidelines. All
samples were analyzed within specified holding times. Each laboratory provided a Level III-type analytical
report PDF file, which are included in this report as Attachment B. In addition, each laboratory provided an
Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) report, which were provided to NAVFAC NW along with this report file.
3.1 Laboratory QA/QC Procedures
Internal test methods run by the laboratory to ensure data accuracy and reproducibility included method
blanks, laboratory control samples, laboratory control sample duplicates, sample replicates, matrix spikes,
and matrix spike duplicates.
3.2 Data Validation
EcoChem, Inc. (EcoChem) was retained to provide a third-party Level III-type data validation report that
provided an assessment of the quality of the PCBs and metals results provided by ARI. This data quality
report is included as Attachment C. As part of this data quality report, data qualifications were assigned to
some of the PCBs and metals results. These data qualifications are included in Tables 3 and 4, and
discussed in Sections 4 and 5 below.
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
6
4.0 RESULTS
4.1 Field Observations
Field observations gathered during sediment sampling are summarized in Table 1. Most sediment samples
were composed primarily of silt and clay-sized particles, with varying fractions of sand and gravel (see
Section 4.2.1 below for further discussion). Samples displayed varying shades of olive gray to olive-green
coloration. Samples collected from stations DD2-M and DD5-M exuded a sulfide odor, other samples did
not exude any distinct odor. Samples collected from stations DD1-W, DD1-M, and DD2-E displayed
evidence of stratification, other samples appeared homogenous. No petroleum sheen, chemical odor, or
sign of gross contamination were observed in sediment samples.
4.2 Laboratory Analysis and Data Quality
In subsections 4.2.3 and 4.2.4 below, concentrations of PCBs and metals in sediment are compared to
Sediment Management Standards (SMS) Marine Sediment Cleanup Screening Levels (CSL) and Marine
Sediment Cleanup Objectives (SCO). The CSL is the concentration of a contaminant in sediment defined
in the Sediment Management Standards code (Washington Administrative Code [WAC] Section 173-204)
as the “minor adverse effects level”, while the SCO is defined as the concentration of a contaminant in
sediment that is the “no adverse effects level”.
Laboratory analytical reports provided by ALS (containing particle size data) and ARI (containing TOC,
PCBs, and metals data) are included as Attachment B. The data quality report referenced in the
subsections below and provided by third-party data validation laboratory EcoChem is included as
Attachment C.
4.2.1 Particle Size
Results of particle size analysis of sediment samples are summarized in Table 2. Samples collected from
stations DD3-E, DD3-W, and DD1-E were composed primarily of gravel-sized particles. The sample
collected from station DD1-M was composed primarily of sand-sized particles. All other sediment samples,
which included all samples collected from stations located adjacent to dry docks 2, 4, and 5, were composed
primarily of silt and clay-sized particles.
Particle size results were not assessed in the data quality report. The case narrative included in the
laboratory analytical report from ALS indicated that no anomalies associated with the analysis of these
samples were observed. A field duplicate of the sample collected from station DD4-W was analyzed; the
results obtained from this sample were very similar to those obtained from the field sample collected from
station DD4-W.
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
7
4.2.2 Total Organic Carbon
Results of TOC analysis of sediment samples are summarized in Table 3. Samples collected during this
scope of work contained concentrations of TOC ranging from 0.29% to 2.90% by weight (wt%).
TOC results were not assessed in the data quality report. The case narrative included in the laboratory
analytical report from ARI indicated that no anomalies associated with the analysis of these samples were
observed. A field duplicate of the sample collected from station DD3-W was analyzed; the results obtained
from this sample (0.72 wt% TOC) were similar to those obtained from the field sample collected from station
DD3-W (0.58 wt% TOC).
4.2.3 Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls
Results of PCBs analysis of sediment samples are summarized in Table 3. Detections of Aroclors 1254
and 1260 were reported for sediment samples collected from each sampling station. No detections of other
PCBs were reported. Total concentrations of PCBs reported in sediment samples ranged from 42.4
micrograms per kilogram (μg/kg) to 406 μg/kg. TOC-normalized PCB concentrations ranged from 5.24 to
70.0 milligrams per kilogram of organic carbon (mg/kgOC). In the sample collected from station DD3-E, the
TOC concentration fell below the range of concentrations normally accepted for use in normalizing PCBs
concentrations (0.5 to 3.5 wt% TOC; Ecology, 2015). Therefore, a TOC-normalized total PCBs
concentration was not reported for this sample. TOC-normalized total PCBs concentrations in samples
collected from stations DD3-W, DD2-E, DD4-E, DD4-M, and DD5-E exceeded the SMS Marine Sediment
SCO. The TOC-normalized total PCBs concentration in the sample collected from station DD3-W also
exceeded the SMS Marine Sediment CSL.
According to the data quality report, due to a non-target background interference, the reporting limit for
Aroclor 1248 was elevated in approximately half of the sediment samples. This elevated reporting limit was
typically approximately 29 μg/kg, which is less than 25% of the reported total PCBs concentration of all
samples for which this issue was identified. Therefore, this is not considered likely to have a significant
impact on the findings of this report.
The analytical method for PCBs analysis requires that a duplicate confirmatory analysis be conducted by
the laboratory for all individual PCBs that are detected in a sample. The data quality report (Attachment C)
noted that for selected samples, the relative percent difference (RPD) between the concentrations of Aroclor
1260 reported for the initial and the duplicate analyses was above 40%. The reported Aroclor 1260
concentrations for these samples were qualified as “estimated” values in the data quality report, and the
total PCBs concentrations for these samples are flagged with a “J” in Table 3. In one sample (DD2-E-
022217), the RPD between the results of these two analyses was greater than 60% for Aroclor 1260. The
reported Aroclor 1260 concentration for this sample is qualified as a “tentative identification” in the data
quality report, and the total PCBs concentrations for this sample are flagged with an “N” in Table 3.
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
8
No other qualifications were assigned to PCBs results by the data quality report. Overall, the data quality
report stated that all PCBs data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.
4.2.4 Metals
Results of metals analysis of sediment samples is summarized in Table 4.
Mercury was reported at concentrations exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment SCO and CSL in sediment
samples collected from all stations except DD3-E and DD3-M. The sample collected from station DD3-M
was reported to contain mercury at a concentration exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment SCO, but not the
CSL.
Arsenic and copper were present at concentrations exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment SCO and CSL in
sediment samples collected from stations DD3-W and DD2-E. Lead and zinc were also reported at a
concentration exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment SCO and CSL in the sample collected from station
DD3-W.
Zinc was reported at concentrations exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment SCO, but not the CSL, in
sediment samples collected from stations DD3-M, DD1-W, DD2-E, DD4-W, and DD5-M.
The RPD between the concentrations of lead and mercury reported the DD3-E field sample and laboratory
duplicate was slightly in exceedance of the 20% control limit set by EcoChem (lead RPD was 24.3%,
mercury RPD was 21.6%). Based on this control limit exceedance, lead and mercury concentrations
reported for all samples are qualified as “estimated” values in the data quality report, and are flagged with
a “J” in Table 4. Kane Environmental notes that the RPDs between the concentrations of lead and mercury
reported in a field sample and a field duplicate collected from station DD1-E were 14.2% and 16.6%,
respectively, both values that fall within the EcoChem 20% control limit. A matrix spike (MS) and matrix
spike duplicate (MSD) were also analyzed for the DD3-E field sample. Based on elevated concentrations
of mercury recovered in the MS and MSD, the data quality report qualified mercury concentrations for all
samples as having a potential high bias due to a matrix effect. These concentrations are flagged with an
“H” in Table 4. See Section 5.0 for discussion of these qualifications.
No other qualifications were assigned to metals results by the data quality report. Overall, the data quality
report stated that all metals data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
9
5.0 DISCUSSION
Elevated concentrations of mercury were reported in sediment samples collected from most of the sediment
sampling stations established adjacent to the saltwater distribution system piping scheduled for
replacement. The concentrations of mercury in sediment exceeded both the SMS Marine Sediment SCO
and CSL concentrations in thirteen of the fifteen sampled locations, including all samples collected near dry
docks 1, 2, 4, and 5. Arsenic, copper, lead, and zinc were also present above both the SMS Marine
Sediment SCO and CSL in the sample collected from station DD3-W, while arsenic and copper were above
these limits in the sample collected from station DD2-E.
The TOC-normalized total PCBs concentration reported in the sediment sample collected from station DD3-
W exceeded the SMS Marine Sediment SCO and CSL. TOC-normalized total PCBs concentrations in
samples collected from several other stations (including at least one sample from the vicinity of each dry
dock except dry dock 1) exceeded the SMS Marine Sediment SCO, but not the CSL.
Based on the results of MS/MSD analyses conducted on sample DD3-E-022217, the data quality report
assigned a potential high bias qualification to mercury concentrations reported for all sediment samples.
This potential high bias (“H” flag in Table 4) indicates that the reported concentration of mercury may be
greater than the actual concentration in the sample. It is notable that the sample on which the MS/MSD
analysis was performed has a gravel-dominated grain size profile that is distinct from the silt and clay-
dominated matrix of most other sediment samples (see Table 2). Therefore, the high-bias matrix effect
suggested by quality control results obtained from this sample may not apply to other samples with silt and
clay-dominated matrices.
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
10
6.0 LIMITATIONS
Kane Environmental has performed this work in general accordance with generally accepted professional
practices using the standard of the industry today, for the nature and conditions of the work completed in
the same locality and at the same time as the work was performed, and with the terms and conditions as
set forth in our proposal.
Kane Environmental shall not be responsible for conditions or consequences arising from relevant facts
that were concealed, withheld, or not fully disclosed at the time the report was prepared. Facts and
conditions referenced in this report may change over time and the conclusions and recommendations set
forth herein are applicable only to the facts and conditions as described at the time the work was performed.
This report does not include other services not specifically described in the scope of work in Section 1.2 of
this report. Conclusions were made within the operative constraints of the scope of work, budget, and
schedule for this project.
Our assessment of the findings of this investigation may change as new data become available, either from
persons familiar with the site or during additional site studies, exploration or sampling. This report is
intended for the exclusive use of Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest, and its designated
assignees. It is not meant to represent a legal opinion. No other warranty, express or implied, is made.
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
11
7.0 REFERENCES
Kane Environmental, Inc. and Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest. 28 October 2016. FINAL
Sampling and Analysis Plan, Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Distribution Piping Replacement: Pre-
and Post-Construction Sampling.
Washington Administrative Code. 25 February 2013. WAC 173-204: Sediment Management Standards.
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). March 2015. Sediment Cleanup Users Manual II.
Ecology Publication No. 12-09-057.
Study Area
(shown in Figure 2)
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
3815 Woodland Park Avenue North, Suite 102
Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476
www.kane-environmental.com
Kane Project No. MOMS7451696
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling
Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement
Dry Docks 1-5, Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton
Base Maps: 1981 USGS Bremerton East and
Bremerton West 7.5-Minute Topographic Maps
N
Dry D
ock 1
Dry D
ock 2
Dry D
ock 4
Dry D
ock 5
Dry D
ock 3
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Figure 2
Study Area Plan
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling
Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement
Dry Docks 1-5, Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton
N
3815 Woodland Park Avenue North, Suite 102
Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476
www.kane-environmental.com
Kane Project No. MOMS7451696
Aerial Photo Date: April 19, 2015
Aerial Photo Source: Google Earth Pro
Approximate outlines of Figures 3 through 7
DD3-E
DD3-M
DD3-W
Figure 3
Dry Dock 3
Sample Locations
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling
Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement
Dry Docks 1-5, Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton
N
3815 Woodland Park Avenue North, Suite 102
Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476
www.kane-environmental.com
Kane Project No: MOMS7451696
Approximate Location of Existing Buried Saltwater Distribution Pipe
Approximate Location of Sediment Sampling Station
Aerial Photo Date: April 19, 2015
Aerial Photo Source: Google Earth Pro
DD1-EDD1-M
DD1-W
Figure 4
Dry Dock 1
Sample Locations
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling
Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement
Dry Docks 1-5, Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton
N
3815 Woodland Park Avenue North, Suite 102
Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476
www.kane-environmental.com
Kane Project No: MOMS7451696
Approximate Location of Existing Buried Saltwater Distribution Pipe
Approximate Location of Sediment Sampling Station
DD2-E
DD2-M
DD2-W
Figure 5
Dry Dock 2
Sample Locations
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling
Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement
Dry Docks 1-5, Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton
N
3815 Woodland Park Avenue North, Suite 102
Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476
www.kane-environmental.com
Kane Project No: MOMS7451696
Approximate Location of Existing Buried Saltwater Distribution Pipe
Aerial Photo Date: April 19, 2015
Aerial Photo Source: Google Earth Pro
Approximate Location of Sediment Sampling Station
DD4-E
DD4-MDD4-W
Figure 6
Dry Dock 4
Sample Locations
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling
Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement
Dry Docks 1-5, Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton
N
3815 Woodland Park Avenue North, Suite 102
Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476
www.kane-environmental.com
Kane Project No: MOMS7451696
Approximate Location of Existing Buried Saltwater Distribution Pipe
Aerial Photo Date: April 19, 2015
Aerial Photo Source: Google Earth Pro
Approximate Location of Sediment Sampling Station
DD5-E
DD5-M
DD5-W
Figure 7
Dry Dock 5
Sample Locations
Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling
Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement
Dry Docks 1-5, Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton
N
3815 Woodland Park Avenue North, Suite 102
Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476
www.kane-environmental.com
Kane Project No: MOMS7451696
Approximate Location of Existing Buried Saltwater Distribution Pipe
Aerial Photo Date: April 19, 2015
Aerial Photo Source: Google Earth Pro
Approximate Location of Sediment Sampling Station
TABLE 1Summary of Sediment Sampling Field ObservationsPre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Main ReplacementNaval Base Kitsap-Bremerton and Puget Sound Naval ShipyardDry Docks 1-5Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
Sampling Station Latitude Longitude Station Location NotesDepth of Water
Sampler Penetration
Depth Sample ID
Sampler Onboard
Time Materials Removed From Sample Sediment Log(decimal ⁰) (decimal ⁰) (feet) (cm)
DD3-E
DD3-M 47.560340 -122.629408 33 feet south of edge of caisson 34 14 DD3-M-022217 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive green silt with clay (ML). Trace medium to coarse sand.
Shell fragments present. No apparent stratification, no odor or sheen.
DD3-W 47.560300 -122.629650
47.560405 -122.629155 34
DD1-E 47.561073 -122.63112885 feet south of
engineering mark on quay wall
32 20 DD1-E-022217, DD1-E-022217-DUP
DD2-E 47.560400 -122.632692 21 feet south of edge of quay wall 42
18 DD1-W-022217 None
15 DD2-E-022217 None
DD1-W 47.561082 -122.63156585 feet south of
engineering mark on quay wall
32
DD1-M 47.561023 -122.63129085 feet south of
engineering mark on quay wall
29 19 DD1-M-022217 None
25 feet south of edge of quay wall
25 feet south of edge of quay wall 34 14 DD3-W-022217,
DD3-W-022217-DUP None
Large clams, three (3)-inch-diameter cobbles12 DD3-E-022217
0-1 cm bsf: Olive-green silt with sand and shell fragments (ML). 1-10 cm bsf: Dark olive-gray silt with fine sand, with trace clay and shell
fragments (ML). No odor or sheen.
0-2 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay and shell fragments (ML). 2-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay, with trace shell fragments and fine to
medium sand (ML). No odor or sheen.
951
1000
1010
1052
1058
1104
1200
0-10 cm bsf: Dark gray to black organic non-plastic silt with clay and trace rounded medium to coarse sand (OL). Few shell fragments present. No apparent
stratification, no odor or sheen.
0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt and clay with gravel (ML). Few shell fragments present. No apparent stratification, no odor or sheen.
0-10 cm bsf: Dark gray-green, silty and clayey gravel and sand (GM-SM). Gravel sizes up to 3/4 inch in diameter. Shell fragments present. No apparent
stratification, no odor or staining.
0-1 cm bsf: Olive-green surficial silt with seaweed fragments (ML). 1-10 cm bsf: Dark olive-gray silt and clay with trace clay, organic matter, and
shell fragments (ML). No odor or sheen.
None
15 DD2-M-022217 1206 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay, with trace shell fragments and fine sand (ML). Sulfide odor. No apparent stratification or sheen.DD2-M 47.560335 -122.632973 36 feet south of edge
of caisson 50
20 DD2-W-022217 1211 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay and shell fragments, with trace fine to medium sand (ML). No apparent stratification. No odor or sheen.DD2-W 47.560418 -122.633158 21 feet south of edge
of quay wall 44
18 DD4-W-022217, DD4-W-022217-DUP 1300 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay, with trace fine sand (ML). No apparent
stratification. No odor or sheen.DD4-W 47.560418 -122.633158 32 feet south of edge of quay wall 49
13 DD4-E-022217 1307 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark gray silt with clay and shell fragments, with trace fine to medium sand (ML). No apparent stratification. No odor or sheen.DD4-E 47.560018 -122.635723 32 feet south of edge
of caisson 49
20 DD4-M-022217 1311 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay (ML). No apparent stratification. No odor or sheen.DD4-M 47.560018 -122.635723 32 feet south of edge
of quay wall 49
bsf = below sea floorGPS points listed are approximate. Sample locations shown in Figure 3‐7 are based on field measurements.
TABLE 1 (continued)Summary of Sediment Sampling Field ObservationsPre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Main ReplacementNaval Base Kitsap-Bremerton and Puget Sound Naval ShipyardDry Docks 1-5Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
Sampling Station Latitude Longitude Station Location NotesDepth of Water
Sampler Penetration
Depth Sample ID
Sampler Onboard
Time Materials Removed From Sample Sediment Log(decimal ⁰) (decimal ⁰) (feet) (cm)
22 DD5-E-022217, DD5-E-022217-DUP 1344 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silty with clay (ML). No apparent stratification, no
odor or staining.DD5-E 47.558077 -122.637698 40 feet south of edge of quay wall 48
19 DD5-M-022217 1349 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay and shell fragments (ML). Trace sulfide odor. No apparent stratification. No sheen.DD5-M 47.558117 -122.637943 40 feet south of edge
of caisson 46
20 DD5-W-022217 1353 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay (ML). Trace sulfide odor. No apparent stratification. No sheen.DD5-W 47.558138 -122.638305 40 feet south of edge
of quay wall 48
bsf = below sea floorGPS points listed are approximate. Sample locations shown in Figure 3‐7 are based on field measurements.
TABLE 2Summary of Sediment Sample Grain SizePre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Main ReplacementNaval Base Kitsap-Bremerton and Puget Sound Naval ShipyardDry Docks 1-5Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Dat
e
Sam
plin
g St
atio
n
Gra
vel,
Med
ium
(<-2
Φ)
Gra
vel,
Fine
(-2
to -1Φ
)TO
TAL
GRA
VEL
Sand
, Ver
y C
oars
e (-1
to 0Φ
)Sa
nd, C
oars
e (0
to 1Φ
)Sa
nd, M
ediu
m (1
to 2Φ
)Sa
nd, F
ine
(2 to
3Φ
)Sa
nd, V
ery
Fine
(3 to
4Φ
)TO
TAL
SAND
31.3
to 7
5 μm
(4 to
5Φ
)15
.6 to
31.
3 μm
(5 to
6Φ
)7.
8 to
15.
6 μm
(6 to
7Φ
)3.
9 to
7.8
μm
(7 to
8Φ
)1.
95 to
3.9
μm
(8 to
9Φ
)0.
98 to
1.9
5 μm
(9 to
10Φ
)<0
.98 μm
(>10Φ
)TO
TAL
SILT
AND
CLA
Y
wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt%DD3-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-E 54.50 28.04 82.54 6.11 2.81 1.23 1.01 0.36 11.52 1.53 1.09 1.44 1.22 2.58 0.51 1.88 10.25DD3-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-M 9.55 17.3 26.85 5.18 6.62 5.03 5.40 2.24 24.47 9.04 7.13 10.38 7.39 7.55 3.91 7.97 53.37DD3-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-W 8.76 50.52 59.28 7.04 12.05 5.90 2.03 0.38 27.40 1.96 1.32 2.33 1.00 1.63 1.78 2.14 12.16DD1-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-E 69.53 5.99 75.52 3.41 1.07 0.49 0.81 0.37 6.15 3.09 3.66 3.84 2.40 1.92 2.56 3.11 20.58DD1-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-W 1.19 2.97 4.16 3.89 1.51 1.26 2.59 1.54 10.79 8.67 17.43 14.68 7.01 9.89 14.60 10.11 82.39DD1-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-M 0.00 2.35 2.35 3.41 8.52 15.87 24.49 4.72 57.01 6.99 5.17 5.64 3.72 3.84 5.17 4.46 34.99DD2-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-E 9.40 20.25 29.65 13.73 6.07 4.64 4.18 1.15 29.77 4.80 13.07 9.55 5.11 1.86 5.69 7.13 47.21DD2-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-M 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.14 0.29 0.48 0.66 1.78 9.25 11.85 19.42 13.34 13.22 9.74 18.93 95.75DD2-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-W 5.19 20.33 25.52 12.49 7.51 5.54 4.71 1.00 31.25 5.97 5.27 5.04 4.09 6.84 3.35 6.22 36.78DD4-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-W 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.90 1.22 2.24 1.34 6.27 11.18 16.12 20.08 9.78 17.52 11.66 7.89 94.23DD4-W-022217-DUP 2/22/2017 DD4-W 0.00 1.29 1.29 0.76 1.20 1.22 1.88 1.52 6.58 10.42 16.39 18.49 10.80 16.06 9.75 11.28 93.19DD4-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-E 4.36 29.51 33.87 14.80 4.13 1.57 1.53 0.68 22.71 3.56 9.97 8.91 3.90 4.38 4.60 8.19 43.51DD4-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-M 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.15 0.21 0.26 0.78 1.06 2.46 11.98 15.20 19.50 9.59 15.45 11.41 13.22 96.35DD5-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-E 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.11 0.19 0.27 1.16 1.15 2.88 7.37 19.91 17.21 15.07 12.48 9.62 16.17 97.83DD5-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-M 9.06 18.33 27.39 6.44 2.76 2.34 4.09 1.88 17.51 6.04 11.74 9.25 5.41 3.78 6.40 7.77 50.39DD5-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-W 2.13 0.86 2.99 0.59 0.67 0.60 1.37 1.06 4.29 8.07 19.87 17.03 10.41 14.14 6.29 18.31 94.12Notes: wt% = weight percent, based on dry weights
TABLE 3Summary of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and Total Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in SedimentPre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Main ReplacementNaval Base Kitsap-Bremerton and Puget Sound Naval ShipyardDry Docks 1-5Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Dat
e
Sam
plin
g St
atio
n
Tota
l Org
anic
Car
bon
(TO
C)
Tota
l PC
Bs
Tota
l PC
Bs (T
OC
-nor
mal
ized
)
wt%DD3-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-E 0.29DD3-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-M 1.26DD3-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-W 0.58 406 J 70.0 JDD3-W-022217-DUP 2/22/2017 DD3-W 0.72DD1-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-E 1.82DD1-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-W 2.81 264 J 9.40 JDD1-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-M 2.35DD2-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-E 1.22 324 N,J 26.6 N,JDD2-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-M 2.84DD2-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-W 2.64DD4-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-W 2.55DD4-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-E 0.90DD4-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-M 2.20DD5-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-E 0.90DD5-E-022217-DUP 2/22/2017 DD5-E ---DD5-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-M 1.79 120 J 6.68 JDD5-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-W 2.90 165 J 5.69 J
Notes: wt% = weight percentug/kg = micrograms per kilogram [equivalent to parts per billion (ppb)]
NV = No cleanup value established under this criteriaBold values exceed the Marine Sediment Cleanup Objective Concentration.Bold and shaded values exceed the Marine Sediment Cleanup Screening Level.
N = According to the data quality report, Aroclor 1260 is considered a tentatively identified compound in this sample.
5.996.32
170
mg/kgOC42.4
---
NA11.6
6.10
5.24
ug/kg
146
---111
123
167
SMS Marine Sediment Cleanup Screening Level (Table III, WAC 173-204-562)
SMS Marine Sediment Cleanup Objective (Table III, WAC 173-204-562) 12
184
mg/kgOC = milligrams per kilogram organic carbon [equivalent to carbon-normalized parts per million]
---
65NV
NV
J = According to the data quality report, the reported concentration of Aroclor 1260 is the approximate concentration of this analyte in the sample.
NA = The total organic carbon concentration for this sample is outside of the range (0.5 to 3.5 wt% TOC) of concentrations acceptable for carbon-normalization of PCBs concentrations (Ecology, 2015). Therefore, no carbon-normalized concentration is listed.
302264280179
11.829.312.719.8
TABLE 4Summary of Metals in SedimentPre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Main ReplacementNaval Base Kitsap-Bremerton and Puget Sound Naval ShipyardDry Docks 1-5Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Dat
e
Sam
plin
g St
atio
n
Arse
nic
Cad
miu
m
Chr
omiu
m
Cop
per
Lead
Nic
kel
Silv
er
Zinc
Mer
cury
DD3-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-E 28.4 J 0.3191 J,HDD3-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-M 136 J 0.4909 J,HDD3-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-W 546 J 1.822 J,HDD1-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-E 66.2 J 0.8374 J,HDD1-E-022217-DUP 2/22/2017 DD1-E 76.3 J 0.9885 J,HDD1-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-W 152 J 1.395 J,HDD1-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-M 103 J 1.237 J,HDD2-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-E 219 J 1.392 J,HDD2-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-M 79.7 J 0.8605 J,HDD2-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-W 70.4 J 0.8313 J,HDD4-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-W 105 J 1.450 J,HDD4-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-E 54.3 J 0.8149 J,HDD4-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-M 90.0 J 0.8845 J,HDD5-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-E 73.8 J 0.7495 J,HDD5-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-M 101 J 0.8146 J,HDD5-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-W 75.6 J 0.7062 J,H
Notes: mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram [equivalent to parts per million (ppm)]NV = No cleanup value under this criteria.Bold values exceed the Marine Sediment Cleanup Objective Concentration.Bold and shaded values exceed the Marine Sediment Cleanup Screening Level.J = According to the data quality report, the listed concentration is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.H = According to the data quality report, based on elevated matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries, a potential high bias due to matrix effects may affect the reported concentration of this analyte.
6.1 410 0.41
25.545.633.635.233.6
260 390 450 NV
0.59270 390 530 NV 6.1 960
1.81
331295232
32.0
41.7
SMS Marine Sediment Cleanup Screening Level (Table III, WAC 173-204-562)
SMS Marine Sediment Cleanup Objective (Table III, WAC 173-204-562) 5.1
45.833.6
93
57
6.7
23.8
32.7
<1.08
2.271.03
<1.16121
1.972.24
2.09
2.730.8412.22
mg/kgmg/kg mg/kg
187
<0.6371.87
0.826
20.050.040.7
153428
2470
mg/kg19.449.6
20.847.165.4
<1.25
mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kgmg/kg
16121920056.6
64.5246511237
24513081519913036.3
67.743.059.061.266.1
35.9
70.142.861.358.0 46.7
32.858.733.246.7
27.4
50.938.8
324
453222808290<1.25
<0.9560.7891.91
<1.62
<0.939<0.511<1.74
332
299
27.6 1.44 41.9 270 33.9 <0.791
217501311392271449<1.16
<0.993
<0.649<0.867<1.88<1.12<1.1245.2
56.345.4
59.0
CLII;NT <::AMPI I= ID
f1. DD3- ,_,
f6.1)D!- M-oz.t'l.ti
fS.pj) 2- M-DL1:"2.1"7 f9.PJ>2· W-01.!"2.1 I 10. ~j)z.j - ,, ~ -17
Report Requirements _ I. Routine Report: Method
Blank, Surrogate, as required
_ Jl. Report Dup., MS, MSO as required
~ Ill. CLP Like Summary (no raw data)
_ IV. Data Validation Report
X..v. EDD
I By:
1111111111111111111111111 73526 CHAIN OF CUSTODY
1317 South 13th Ave, Kelso, WA 9862~ Phone (360) 577-7222/80Q..695-7222/ FAX (360) 636-1068
I
n.
I LABID Date Time Matrix
" '" O'l5 i S~ec\ I X .·
~~ ,_., looo I X yn 11 11>10 I X z.Jzz, 11 IOSZ. I )<
Z-/1-2117 /05"0 2. )< 'rZ/Z.Zi/1 lict.i I )<
Circle which metals are to be analvzed on
1 SR# ~~ /7ol&:li
.I
COC Set __ of __
COC#·-"~--...,~-Page 1 of;!(
'2-
Total Metals: AI As Sb Ba Be 8 Ca Cd Cfo Cr Cu Fe Pb Mg Mn Mo Ni K Ag Na Se Sr Tl- Sn V Zn Hg
Dissolved Metals: AI As Sb Ba Be B Ca Cd Co Cr Cu Fe Pb Mg Mn Mo Ni K Ag Na Se Sr Tl Sn V Zn Hg
Tm .. u. vwuu "~"w". 24 hr. 48 hr.
-5Day -J(:standard
i i I 'State: AK CA WI Other I Circle One)
At11al'"\s <5 l:>j ASTM 'D'f21.. - Lo>"tieVIi.>e & brea.i-<ou-1- ·
J;:x-1-;"- coA+a.rvte.Y6 prov'cX.e.J. oV\ ~led s«..w<pie.S .[;,, lc.t.b QC P"'f'o%:5.
I By: !By: .J By: -~·"
I By:
I ~i~te~:me h }l>Ul 4'-. 1\ 1 Pri fc..b lf'nnted Name Printed Name Printed Name printed Name
ILJaioni•u• Z./1._'~/11 · 1525 ;ua1onhne Vd\0''""" u•••• • i•ne ua1e1 • """ I '
Page 9 of 58
A ~onuln:mn,.,n>ai CHAIN OF CUSTODY r01
I I SR# ( ( I
II 11111111111111111111111 73526 COC Set __ of __
COG# ~
1317 South 13th Ave, Kelso, WA 9862? Phone (360) 577-72221800~95.-7222 I FAX (360) 636-1068 ' I Page
I PStvS'~ D. _,-_ - • )A; looM r;'"ilb'/0 I~ Zck • !n.LD E .• ~)VI
lcomp•ny it<t<Ae- I;V\VII/1:> V\ t\ lj 3a~j;! ! fl<.-1'- A..e.IJ, SJe, IOZ " , , wA 'l"l>l 03
~t.J1b "4 ;:~::le• enn~ ,,,. j.,, .
I
l II -~~ rJa+e.. E"vwso"'
Cl.lf=_NT SAM PI t:; 10 LABID Date Time Matrix
j1. PDI.f- iJ- ot'2.211· ~iJP /t7 130:3 2hZ. I ~e.& I l'x J2. ·ot..~'Z.J1 Jz In (!1 /?,~/- I I l'x' j3. i)i)i.l ~~ l'z. /z1.(11 lbJ I 12. I'X J4. Di/5- E> o-z:z:VI lz. In f II I ;J<./ '-1 I IX ,I IS.f>D5 ·M·o~nn 1'2 ln. 117 il>'-ICi 1 D< Je.D1>5- w-o-z.n_L7 /n, 11 '17 13')3 ' 1 I>< J7. J8. ,9. ·- 1-10.
-· H~mD '""v""""v" QirrJe whicb metals @[!il to be analyzeg
_I. Routine Report: Method P.O.#l!dD&l:l:I!:I!il ~ :f.i.;, Blank, Surrogate, as Bill To:. Total Metals: AI As Sb ~-B~~~~~~~~~-MK~~•&n~v~~ required
o.o@ ~a.N:- •·•· '' ~~ .,MJ..f.c<ll-_II. Report Dup., MS, MSD
Dissolved Metals: AI As Sb Ba Be B Ca Cd Co Cr Cu Fe Pb Mg Mn Mo Ni K Ag Na Se Sr Tl Sn V Zn Hg
as required I I 'State :AKCAWI : OthPr i 'One) 2{. Ill. CLP Like Summary Tur""'~~ .. ~ ,. ...~ ... ~
L"~~c.-\ lorw. leO v+, (no raw data) 24 hr. _48hr. AM1j615 b'j .1\STM DLf"Z'Z- -=5Day
_ IV. Data Validation Report .X.. Standard 'Ex+-("31, Co...,+au'\U-5 pro J• d.e.J Oil\ "5:€,.-l e.c:J- scwvtpleB .f;r /o...b &C f'Vf05e-S. ){v. EDD
I By: ~J }f&Yf
!By: I By: ley: I By: I By:
,~_,('....,. ).u J!J .i •• .i ••
lr:te;;a~ lt'ri )T
Printed Name 1 Printed Name j Printed Name Printed Name
( U: he.. Gt ' l< """'""' n ..J,., J rin
9 ""417 !()10 Hrm jFirm jfirm jFirm
i Z..l &-f> Ill l">l.f'i i uatell ime '
Page 10 of 58
March 16, 2017 Analytical Report for Service Request No: K1701881
Nate EvensonKane Environmental3815 Woodland Park Avenue N, Suite 102Seattle, WA 98103
Analyses were performed according to our laboratory’s NELAP-approved quality assurance program. The test results meet requirements of the current NELAP standards, where applicable, and except as noted in the laboratory case narrative provided. For a specific list of NELAP-accredited analytes, refer to the certifications section at www.alsglobal.com. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and ALS Group USA Corp. dba ALS Environmental (ALS) is not responsible for use of less than the complete report. Results apply only to the items submitted to the laboratory for analysis and individual items (samples) analyzed, as listed in the report.
For your reference, these analyses have been assigned our service request numberEnclosed are the results of the sample(s) submitted to our laboratory February 24, 2017
RE: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC / MOMS7451696
Dear Nate,
K1701881.
Please contact me if you have any questions. My extension is 3275. You may also contact me via email at [email protected].
Respectfully submitted,
ALS Group USA, Corp. dba ALS Environmental
Chris LeafProject Manager
ALS Group USA, Corp1317 South 13th AvenueKelso, WA 98626
+1 360 577 7222+1 360 636 1068
T :F :
ALS Environmental
www.alsglobal.com
RIGHT SOLUTIONS | RIGHT PARTNERPage 1 of 58
www.alsglobal.com
ALS Environmental
F :T :
+1 360 636 1068+1 360 577 7222
Kelso, WA 986261317 South 13th AvenueALS Group USA, Corp
Table of Contents
RIGHT SOLUTIONS | RIGHT PARTNER
Acronyms
Qualifiers
State Certifications, Accreditations, And Licenses
Case Narrative
Chain of Custody
Total Solids
General Chemistry
Raw Data
Total Solids
General Chemistry
Page 2 of 58
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
A2LA American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
CARB California Air Resources Board
CAS Number Chemical Abstract Service registry Number
CFC Chlorofluorocarbon
CFU Colony-Forming Unit
DEC Department of Environmental Conservation
DEQ Department of Environmental Quality
DHS Department of Health Services
DOE Department of Ecology
DOH Department of Health
EPA U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
ELAP Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
GC Gas Chromatography
GC/MS Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
LOD Limit of Detection
LOQ Limit of Quantitation
LUFT Leaking Underground Fuel Tank
M ModifiedMCL Maximum Contaminant Level is the highest permissible concentration of a substance
allowed in drinking water as established by the USEPA.
MDL Method Detection Limit
MPN Most Probable Number
MRL Method Reporting Limit
NA Not Applicable
NC Not Calculated
NCASI National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement
ND Not Detected
NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
SIM Selected Ion Monitoring
TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbonstr Trace level is the concentration of an analyte that is less than the PQL but greater than or
equal to the MDL.
Acronyms
Page 3 of 58
Inorganic Data Qualifiers
* The result is an outlier. See case narrative.
# The control limit criteria is not applicable. See case narrative.
B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result as defined by the DOD or NELAC standards.
E The result is an estimate amount because the value exceeded the instrument calibration range.
J The result is an estimated value.
U The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non-detect") at or above the MRL/MDL. DOD-QSM 4.2 definition : Analyte was not detected and is reported as less than the LOD or as defined by the project. The detection limit is adjusted for dilution.
i The MRL/MDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a matrix interference.
X See case narrative.
Q See case narrative. One or more quality control criteria was outside the limits.
H The holding time for this test is immediately following sample collection. The samples were analyzed as soon as possible afterreceipt by the laboratory.
Metals Data Qualifiers
# The control limit criteria is not applicable. See case narrative.
J The result is an estimated value.
E The percent difference for the serial dilution was greater than 10%, indicating a possible matrix interference in the sample.
M The duplicate injection precision was not met.
N The Matrix Spike sample recovery is not within control limits. See case narrative.
S The reported value was determined by the Method of Standard Additions (MSA).
U The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non-detect") at or above the MRL/MDL. DOD-QSM 4.2 definition : Analyte was not detected and is reported as less than the LOD or as defined by the project. The detection limit is adjusted for dilution.
W The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits, while sample absorbance is less than 50% of spike absorbance.
i The MRL/MDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a matrix interference.
X See case narrative.
+ The correlation coefficient for the MSA is less than 0.995.
Q See case narrative. One or more quality control criteria was outside the limits.
Organic Data Qualifiers
* The result is an outlier. See case narrative.
# The control limit criteria is not applicable. See case narrative.
A A tentatively identified compound, a suspected aldol-condensation product.
B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result as defined by the DOD or NELAC standards.
C The analyte was qualitatively confirmed using GC/MS techniques, pattern recognition, or by comparing to historical data.
D The reported result is from a dilution.
E The result is an estimated value.
J The result is an estimated value.
N The result is presumptive. The analyte was tentatively identified, but a confirmation analysis was not performed.
PThe GC or HPLC confirmation criteria was exceeded. The relative percent difference is greater than 40% between the two analytical results.
U The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non-detect") at or above the MRL/MDL. DOD-QSM 4.2 definition : Analyte was not detected and is reported as less than the LOD or as defined by the project. The detection limit is adjusted for dilution.
i The MRL/MDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a chromatographic interference.
X See case narrative.
Q See case narrative. One or more quality control criteria was outside the limits.
Additional Petroleum Hydrocarbon Specific Qualifiers
F The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample matches the elution pattern of the calibration standard.
L The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates the presence of a greater amount of lighter molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.
H The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates the presence of a greater amount of heavier molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.
O The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles an oil, but does not match the calibration standard.
Y The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product eluting in approximately the correct carbon range, but the elution pattern does not match the calibration standard.
Z The chromatographic fingerprint does not resemble a petroleum product.
Page 4 of 58
Agency Web Site Number
Alaska DEC UST http://dec.alaska.gov/applications/eh/ehllabreports/USTLabs.aspx UST-040
Arizona DHS http://www.azdhs.gov/lab/license/env.htm AZ0339
Arkansas - DEQ http://www.adeq.state.ar.us/techsvs/labcert.htm 88-0637
California DHS (ELAP) http://www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/labs/Pages/ELAP.aspx 2795
DOD ELAP http://www.denix.osd.mil/edqw/Accreditation/AccreditedLabs.cfm L14-51
Florida DOH http://www.doh.state.fl.us/lab/EnvLabCert/WaterCert.htm E87412
Hawaii DOH Not available -
ISO 17025 http://www.pjlabs.com/ L16-57
Louisiana DEQhttp://www.deq.louisiana.gov/portal/DIVISIONS/PublicParticipationandPermitSupport/LouisianaLaboratoryAccreditationProgram.aspx 03016
Maine DHS Not available WA01276
Minnesota DOH http://www.health.state.mn.us/accreditation 053-999-457
Montana DPHHS http://www.dphhs.mt.gov/publichealth/ CERT0047
Nevada DEP http://ndep.nv.gov/bsdw/labservice.htm WA01276
New Jersey DEP http://www.nj.gov/dep/oqa/ WA005
North Carolina DWQ http://www.dwqlab.org/ 605
Oklahoma DEQ http://www.deq.state.ok.us/CSDnew/labcert.htm 9801
Oregon – DEQ (NELAP)http://public.health.oregon.gov/LaboratoryServices/EnvironmentalLaboratoryAccreditation/Pages/index.aspx WA100010
South Carolina DHEC http://www.scdhec.gov/environment/envserv/ 61002
Texas CEQ http://www.tceq.texas.gov/field/qa/env_lab_accreditation.html T104704427
Washington DOE http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/eap/labs/lab-accreditation.html C544
Wyoming (EPA Region 8) http://www.epa.gov/region8/water/dwhome/wyomingdi.html -
Kelso Laboratory Website www.alsglobal.com NA
ALS Group USA Corp. dba ALS Environmental (ALS) - KelsoState Certifications, Accreditations, and Licenses
Analyses were performed according to our laboratory’s NELAP-approved quality assurance program. A complete listing of specific NELAP-certified analytes, can be found in the certification section at www.ALSGlobal.com or at the accreditation bodies web site.Please refer to the certification and/or accreditation body's web site if samples are submitted for compliance purposes. The states highlighted above, require the analysis be listed on the state certification if used for compliance purposes and if the method/anlayte is offered by that state.
Page 5 of 58
Case Narrative
ALS Environmental—Kelso Laboratory 1317 South 13th Avenue, Kelso, WA 98626 Phone (360)577-7222 Fax (360)636-1068 www.alsglobal.com
RIGHT SOLUTIONS | RIGHT PARTNER
Page 6 of 58
Approved by______________________________________________
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL Client: Kane Environmental Service Request No.: K1701881 Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/ Date Received: 02/24/17 MOMS7451696 Sample Matrix: Sediment
Case Narrative All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of ALS Environmental. This report contains analytical results for samples designated for Tier IV validation deliverables including summary forms and all of the associated raw data for each of the analyses. When appropriate to the method, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test. Sample Receipt Sixteen sediment samples were received for analysis at ALS Environmental on 02/24/17. The samples were received in good condition and consistent with the accompanying chain of custody form. The samples were stored in a refrigerator at 4ºC upon receipt at the laboratory. General Chemistry Parameters No anomalies associated with the analysis of these samples were observed.
Page 7 of 58
Chain of Custody
ALS Environmental—Kelso Laboratory 1317 South 13th Avenue, Kelso, WA 98626 Phone (360)577-7222 Fax (360)636-1068 www.alsglobal.com
RIGHT SOLUTIONS | RIGHT PARTNER
Page 8 of 58
CLII;NT <::AMPI I= ID
f1. DD3- ,_,
f6.1)D!- M-oz.t'l.ti
fS.pj) 2- M-DL1:"2.1"7 f9.PJ>2· W-01.!"2.1 I 10. ~j)z.j - ,, ~ -17
Report Requirements _ I. Routine Report: Method
Blank, Surrogate, as required
_ Jl. Report Dup., MS, MSO as required
~ Ill. CLP Like Summary (no raw data)
_ IV. Data Validation Report
X..v. EDD
I By:
1111111111111111111111111 73526 CHAIN OF CUSTODY
1317 South 13th Ave, Kelso, WA 9862~ Phone (360) 577-7222/80Q..695-7222/ FAX (360) 636-1068
I
n.
I LABID Date Time Matrix
" '" O'l5 i S~ec\ I X .·
~~ ,_., looo I X yn 11 11>10 I X z.Jzz, 11 IOSZ. I )<
Z-/1-2117 /05"0 2. )< 'rZ/Z.Zi/1 lict.i I )<
Circle which metals are to be analvzed on
1 SR# ~~ /7ol&:li
.I
COC Set __ of __
COC#·-"~--...,~-Page 1 of;!(
'2-
Total Metals: AI As Sb Ba Be 8 Ca Cd Cfo Cr Cu Fe Pb Mg Mn Mo Ni K Ag Na Se Sr Tl- Sn V Zn Hg
Dissolved Metals: AI As Sb Ba Be B Ca Cd Co Cr Cu Fe Pb Mg Mn Mo Ni K Ag Na Se Sr Tl Sn V Zn Hg
Tm .. u. vwuu "~"w". 24 hr. 48 hr.
-5Day -J(:standard
i i I 'State: AK CA WI Other I Circle One)
At11al'"\s <5 l:>j ASTM 'D'f21.. - Lo>"tieVIi.>e & brea.i-<ou-1- ·
J;:x-1-;"- coA+a.rvte.Y6 prov'cX.e.J. oV\ ~led s«..w<pie.S .[;,, lc.t.b QC P"'f'o%:5.
I By: !By: .J By: -~·"
I By:
I ~i~te~:me h }l>Ul 4'-. 1\ 1 Pri fc..b lf'nnted Name Printed Name Printed Name printed Name
ILJaioni•u• Z./1._'~/11 · 1525 ;ua1onhne Vd\0''""" u•••• • i•ne ua1e1 • """ I '
Page 9 of 58
A ~onuln:mn,.,n>ai CHAIN OF CUSTODY r01
I I SR# ( ( I
II 11111111111111111111111 73526 COC Set __ of __
COG# ~
1317 South 13th Ave, Kelso, WA 9862? Phone (360) 577-72221800~95.-7222 I FAX (360) 636-1068 ' I Page
I PStvS'~ D. _,-_ - • )A; looM r;'"ilb'/0 I~ Zck • !n.LD E .• ~)VI
lcomp•ny it<t<Ae- I;V\VII/1:> V\ t\ lj 3a~j;! ! fl<.-1'- A..e.IJ, SJe, IOZ " , , wA 'l"l>l 03
~t.J1b "4 ;:~::le• enn~ ,,,. j.,, .
I
l II -~~ rJa+e.. E"vwso"'
Cl.lf=_NT SAM PI t:; 10 LABID Date Time Matrix
j1. PDI.f- iJ- ot'2.211· ~iJP /t7 130:3 2hZ. I ~e.& I l'x J2. ·ot..~'Z.J1 Jz In (!1 /?,~/- I I l'x' j3. i)i)i.l ~~ l'z. /z1.(11 lbJ I 12. I'X J4. Di/5- E> o-z:z:VI lz. In f II I ;J<./ '-1 I IX ,I IS.f>D5 ·M·o~nn 1'2 ln. 117 il>'-ICi 1 D< Je.D1>5- w-o-z.n_L7 /n, 11 '17 13')3 ' 1 I>< J7. J8. ,9. ·- 1-10.
-· H~mD '""v""""v" QirrJe whicb metals @[!il to be analyzeg
_I. Routine Report: Method P.O.#l!dD&l:l:I!:I!il ~ :f.i.;, Blank, Surrogate, as Bill To:. Total Metals: AI As Sb ~-B~~~~~~~~~-MK~~•&n~v~~ required
o.o@ ~a.N:- •·•· '' ~~ .,MJ..f.c<ll-_II. Report Dup., MS, MSD
Dissolved Metals: AI As Sb Ba Be B Ca Cd Co Cr Cu Fe Pb Mg Mn Mo Ni K Ag Na Se Sr Tl Sn V Zn Hg
as required I I 'State :AKCAWI : OthPr i 'One) 2{. Ill. CLP Like Summary Tur""'~~ .. ~ ,. ...~ ... ~
L"~~c.-\ lorw. leO v+, (no raw data) 24 hr. _48hr. AM1j615 b'j .1\STM DLf"Z'Z- -=5Day
_ IV. Data Validation Report .X.. Standard 'Ex+-("31, Co...,+au'\U-5 pro J• d.e.J Oil\ "5:€,.-l e.c:J- scwvtpleB .f;r /o...b &C f'Vf05e-S. ){v. EDD
I By: ~J }f&Yf
!By: I By: ley: I By: I By:
,~_,('....,. ).u J!J .i •• .i ••
lr:te;;a~ lt'ri )T
Printed Name 1 Printed Name j Printed Name Printed Name
( U: he.. Gt ' l< """'""' n ..J,., J rin
9 ""417 !()10 Hrm jFirm jfirm jFirm
i Z..l &-f> Ill l">l.f'i i uatell ime '
Page 10 of 58
A PCC (_ Cooler Receipt and Preservation Form
Client tart [nJ Received: ,_)) ' '"JY1 - f 7
Ser..vice Request K17__:o:O_· _!_<?_' _fl_/ -----;--c--
By: Z::.j ) Unloaded: cQ ,;J 'f ·I 7 By: O...c) Opened: ,;) :JL.f 1 ]
L Samples were received via? USPS ( \}:edEx_/ UPS DHL PDX Courier Hand Delivered
2. Samples were received in: (circle) (::__~o,;{;; ~: Box Envelope Other
3. Were custody seals on coolers? NA··"Q) N If yes, how many and where? ( f·rcrrf / '\
If present, were custody seals intact? ('-.Y,/ N If present, were they signed and dated?
NA
(.y' N . '-, ... .J ., lj,.,. . -- ColT. Thermometer Cooler/COC 10 Tracking Number
c~ -... ... -_~rT11t'np Cooletr: TemoBiank T;;;;;;,...., Factor ID NA
-o :;;J - () 2' ! ·1 i>< of '-~ '}{ {) 735.;( !:c:' (; 4'1-f q:.nq - -- - - - -I- - -
4. Packing material: Insert(_!Jaggi:_!) Bubble WrdjJ ,GelP~c~~-Wet Ice 'pry Ice Sleeves
5. Were custody papers properlyfi]!.;d out (ink, signed, etc.)? ..... . ·-··--------· -
6. Were samples received in good condition (temperature, unbroken)? Indicate in the table below
If applicable, tissue samples were received: Frozen Partially Thawed Thawed 7. Were all sample labels complete (i.e analysis, preservation, etc.)?
8. Did all sample labels and tags agree with custody papers? Indicate major discrepancies in the table on page 2.
9. Were appropriate bottles/containers and volumes received for the tests indicated?
I 0. Were the pH-preserved bottles (see SMO GEN SOP) received at the appropriate pH? Indicate in the table below
I 1. Were VOA vials received without headspace? Indicate in the table below.
12. Was C12/Res negative?
-~·:;_
Sample ID on Bottle Sample 10 on COC Identified by:
NA Filed
i7D1
NA( ~-Y) N . \
NA Yj -----···
NA (_l_-) NA _ y __ )
?,.e•''-
NA '_ Y _]\18__) y
r'N'A~' Y )-'--·)\
'- NA Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
I I I ---------
I'·_· .• t~ BoUle Count Out of Head- Volume Reagent Lot sample to Bottle Type Temn space Broke pH Reaaent added Number Initial$ Time
L. - - - - .. -- L.. - ~- - ~ - --
Notes, Discrepancies, & Resolutions:. ___________________________________ _
7125116 Page __ oj __ _
Page 11 of 58
Total Solids
ALS Environmental—Kelso Laboratory 1317 South 13th Avenue, Kelso, WA 98626 Phone (360)577-7222 Fax (360)636-1068 www.alsglobal.com
RIGHT SOLUTIONS | RIGHT PARTNER
Page 12 of 58
Client:
02/24/17
K1701881
Date Received:Date Collected:
Service Request:
SoilPSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696Kane Environmental
Sample Matrix:Project: 02/22/17
Solids, Total
Basis:Units: Percent
As Received160.3 ModifiedNonePrep Method:
Analysis Method:
Lab CodeSample NameDate
AnalyzedDil.MDLMRLResult Q
DD3-E-022217 02/27/17 10:391--77.2K1701881-001DD3-M-022217 02/27/17 10:391--41.5K1701881-002DD3-W-022217 02/27/17 10:391--76.2K1701881-003DD1-E-022217 02/27/17 10:391--37.8K1701881-004DD1-W-022217 02/27/17 10:391--32.7K1701881-005DD1-M-022217 02/27/17 10:391--60.0K1701881-006DD2-E-022217 02/27/17 10:391--42.8K1701881-007DD2-M-022217 02/27/17 10:391--24.3K1701881-008DD2-W-022217 02/27/17 10:391--50.8K1701881-009DD4-W-022217 02/27/17 10:391--32.0K1701881-010DD4-W-022217-DUP 02/27/17 10:391--32.7K1701881-011DD4-E-022217 02/27/17 10:391--43.8K1701881-012DD4-M-022217 02/27/17 10:391--26.6K1701881-013DD5-E-022217 02/27/17 10:391--25.8K1701881-014DD5-M-022217 02/27/17 10:391--46.1K1701881-015DD5-W-022217 02/27/17 10:391--28.7K1701881-016
Analytical Report
ALS Group USA, Corp. dba ALS Environmental
Printed 2/28/2017 9:39:13 AM 17-0000412702 rev 00Superset Reference:
Page 13 of 58
ALS Group USA, Corp.dba ALS Environmental
QA/QC Report
Client:ProjectSample Matrix:
Prep Method:Analysis Method:
Kane EnvironmentalPSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696Soil
160.3 ModifiedNone
Service Request:Date Collected:Date Received:
Basis:Units:
K170188102/22/1702/24/17
PercentAs Received
Replicate Sample SummaryInorganic Parameters
Sample Name: Lab Code:Date
AnalyzedRPDLimitMRL RPD
DuplicateResult Average
SampleResult
1 - 32.7 32.3 32.5 20DD1-W-022217 K1701881-005DUP 02/27/1710 - 50.8 46.0 48.4 20DD2-W-022217 K1701881-009DUP 02/27/17<1 - 26.6 26.5 26.6 20DD4-M-022217 K1701881-013DUP 02/27/17
Results flagged with an asterisk (*) indicate values outside control criteria.
Results flagged with a pound (#) indicate the control criteria is not applicable.
Percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPD) are determined by the software using values in the calculation which have not been rounded.
Printed 2/28/2017 9:39:13 AM 17-0000412702 rev 00Superset Reference:
Page 14 of 58
General Chemistry
ALS Environmental—Kelso Laboratory 1317 South 13th Avenue, Kelso, WA 98626 Phone (360)577-7222 Fax (360)636-1068 www.alsglobal.com
RIGHT SOLUTIONS | RIGHT PARTNER
Page 15 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD3-E-022217Lab Code: K1701881-001
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 37.0416Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 37.0307Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.97
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 21.4444 54.55Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 11.0236 28.04Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 2.4022 6.11Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 1.1051 2.81Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.4825 1.23Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.3955 1.01Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.1433 0.3675.0 µm 4 Ø 0.6000 1.5331.3 µm 5 Ø 0.4300 1.0915.6 µm 6 Ø 0.5650 1.447.8 µm 7 Ø 0.4800 1.223.9 µm 8 Ø 1.0150 2.581.95 µm 9 Ø 0.2000 0.510.98 µm > 10 Ø 0.7400 1.88
41.0266 104.36
K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 16 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD3-M-022217Lab Code: K1701881-002
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 6.8588Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 6.8164Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.38
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 1.2457 9.55Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 2.2518 17.25Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 0.6757 5.18Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.8636 6.62Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.6560 5.03Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.7042 5.40Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.2929 2.2475.0 µm 4 Ø 1.1800 9.0431.3 µm 5 Ø 0.9300 7.1315.6 µm 6 Ø 1.3550 10.387.8 µm 7 Ø 0.9650 7.393.9 µm 8 Ø 0.9850 7.551.95 µm 9 Ø 0.5100 3.910.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.0400 7.97
13.6549 104.63
K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 17 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD3-W-022217Lab Code: K1701881-003
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 33.8930Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 33.8340Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.83
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 3.4161 8.76Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 19.7068 50.52Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 2.7477 7.04Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 4.7008 12.05Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 2.3018 5.90Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.7917 2.03Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.1491 0.3875.0 µm 4 Ø 0.7650 1.9631.3 µm 5 Ø 0.5150 1.3215.6 µm 6 Ø 0.9100 2.337.8 µm 7 Ø 0.3900 1.003.9 µm 8 Ø 0.6350 1.631.95 µm 9 Ø 0.6950 1.780.98 µm > 10 Ø 0.8350 2.14
38.5590 98.84
K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 18 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD1-E-022217Lab Code: K1701881-004
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 34.1179Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 34.0938Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.93
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 28.9370 69.53Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 2.4915 5.99Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 1.4185 3.41Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.4435 1.07Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.2055 0.49Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.3367 0.81Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.1545 0.3775.0 µm 4 Ø 1.2850 3.0931.3 µm 5 Ø 1.5250 3.6615.6 µm 6 Ø 1.6000 3.847.8 µm 7 Ø 1.0000 2.403.9 µm 8 Ø 0.8000 1.921.95 µm 9 Ø 1.0650 2.560.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.2950 3.11
42.5572 102.25
K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 19 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD1-W-022217Lab Code: K1701881-005
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 1.8523Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 1.7951Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 96.91
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 0.1364 1.19Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 0.3403 2.97Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 0.4462 3.89Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.1732 1.51Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.1443 1.26Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.2969 2.59Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.1765 1.5475.0 µm 4 Ø 0.9950 8.6731.3 µm 5 Ø 2.0000 17.4315.6 µm 6 Ø 1.6850 14.687.8 µm 7 Ø 0.8050 7.013.9 µm 8 Ø 1.1350 9.891.95 µm 9 Ø 1.6750 14.600.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.1600 10.11
11.1688 97.33
K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 20 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD1-M-022217Lab Code: K1701881-006
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 12.2900Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 12.2009Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.28
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 0.0000 0.00Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 0.4762 2.35Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 0.6924 3.41Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 1.7302 8.52Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 3.2215 15.87Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 4.9726 24.49Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.9587 4.7275.0 µm 4 Ø 1.4200 6.9931.3 µm 5 Ø 1.0500 5.1715.6 µm 6 Ø 1.1450 5.647.8 µm 7 Ø 0.7550 3.723.9 µm 8 Ø 0.7800 3.841.95 µm 9 Ø 1.0500 5.170.98 µm > 10 Ø 0.9050 4.46
19.1566 94.36
K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 21 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD2-E-022217Lab Code: K1701881-007
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 10.8818Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 10.8172Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.41
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 1.6929 9.40Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 3.6482 20.25Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 2.4736 13.73Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 1.0931 6.07Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.8351 4.64Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.7522 4.18Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.2068 1.1575.0 µm 4 Ø 0.8650 4.8031.3 µm 5 Ø 2.3550 13.0715.6 µm 6 Ø 1.7200 9.557.8 µm 7 Ø 0.9200 5.113.9 µm 8 Ø 0.3350 1.861.95 µm 9 Ø 1.0250 5.690.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.2850 7.13
19.2069 106.62
K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 22 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD2-M-022217Lab Code: K1701881-008
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 0.3162Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 0.3121Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 98.70
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 0.0000 0.00Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 0.0069 0.09Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 0.0173 0.21Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.0109 0.14Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.0237 0.29Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.0383 0.48Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.0534 0.6675.0 µm 4 Ø 0.7450 9.2531.3 µm 5 Ø 0.9550 11.8515.6 µm 6 Ø 1.5650 19.427.8 µm 7 Ø 1.0750 13.343.9 µm 8 Ø 1.0650 13.221.95 µm 9 Ø 0.7850 9.740.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.5250 18.93
7.8655 97.61
K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 23 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD2-W-022217Lab Code: K1701881-009
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 11.5724Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 11.5005Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.38
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 1.0385 5.19Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 4.0711 20.33Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 2.5005 12.49Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 1.5042 7.51Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 1.1097 5.54Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.9433 4.71Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.2012 1.0075.0 µm 4 Ø 1.1950 5.9731.3 µm 5 Ø 1.0550 5.2715.6 µm 6 Ø 1.0100 5.047.8 µm 7 Ø 0.8200 4.093.9 µm 8 Ø 1.3700 6.841.95 µm 9 Ø 0.6700 3.350.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.2450 6.22
18.7335 93.55
K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 24 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD4-W-022217Lab Code: K1701881-010
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 0.8855Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 0.8861Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 100.07
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 0.0000 0.00Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 0.1031 1.00Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 0.0585 0.57Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.0927 0.90Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.1263 1.22Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.2311 2.24Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.1382 1.3475.0 µm 4 Ø 1.1550 11.1831.3 µm 5 Ø 1.6650 16.1215.6 µm 6 Ø 2.0750 20.087.8 µm 7 Ø 1.0100 9.783.9 µm 8 Ø 1.8100 17.521.95 µm 9 Ø 1.2050 11.660.98 µm > 10 Ø 0.8150 7.89
10.4849 101.49
K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 25 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD4-W-022217-DUPLab Code: K1701881-011
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 1.0040Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 0.9499Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 94.61
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 0.0000 0.00Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 0.1353 1.29Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 0.0797 0.76Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.1253 1.20Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.1276 1.22Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.1965 1.88Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.1587 1.5275.0 µm 4 Ø 1.0900 10.4231.3 µm 5 Ø 1.7150 16.3915.6 µm 6 Ø 1.9350 18.497.8 µm 7 Ø 1.1300 10.803.9 µm 8 Ø 1.6800 16.061.95 µm 9 Ø 1.0200 9.750.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.1800 11.28
10.5731 101.05
K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 26 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD4-E-022217Lab Code: K1701881-012
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 11.9294Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 11.8640Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.45
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 0.9047 4.36Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 6.1279 29.51Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 3.0739 14.80Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.8566 4.13Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.3265 1.57Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.3186 1.53Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.1416 0.6875.0 µm 4 Ø 0.7400 3.5631.3 µm 5 Ø 2.0700 9.9715.6 µm 6 Ø 1.8500 8.917.8 µm 7 Ø 0.8100 3.903.9 µm 8 Ø 0.9100 4.381.95 µm 9 Ø 0.9550 4.600.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.7000 8.19
20.7848 100.10
K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 27 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD4-M-022217Lab Code: K1701881-013
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 0.4682Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 0.4629Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 98.87
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 0.0000 0.00Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 0.0396 0.41Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 0.0148 0.15Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.0205 0.21Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.0253 0.26Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.0748 0.78Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.1023 1.0675.0 µm 4 Ø 1.1550 11.9831.3 µm 5 Ø 1.4650 15.2015.6 µm 6 Ø 1.8800 19.507.8 µm 7 Ø 0.9250 9.593.9 µm 8 Ø 1.4900 15.451.95 µm 9 Ø 1.1000 11.410.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.2750 13.22
9.5673 99.24
K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 28 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD5-E-022217Lab Code: K1701881-014
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 0.6889Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 0.6841Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.30
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 0.0000 0.00Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 0.1568 1.72Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 0.0103 0.11Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.0171 0.19Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.0250 0.27Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.1052 1.16Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.1049 1.1575.0 µm 4 Ø 0.6700 7.3731.3 µm 5 Ø 1.8100 19.9115.6 µm 6 Ø 1.5650 17.217.8 µm 7 Ø 1.3700 15.073.9 µm 8 Ø 1.1350 12.481.95 µm 9 Ø 0.8750 9.620.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.4700 16.17
9.3143 102.44
K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 29 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD5-M-022217Lab Code: K1701881-015
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 10.8983Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 10.8514Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.57
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 2.1451 9.06Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 4.3385 18.33Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 1.5254 6.44Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.6537 2.76Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.5528 2.34Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.9671 4.09Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.4448 1.8875.0 µm 4 Ø 1.4300 6.0431.3 µm 5 Ø 2.7800 11.7415.6 µm 6 Ø 2.1900 9.257.8 µm 7 Ø 1.2800 5.413.9 µm 8 Ø 0.8950 3.781.95 µm 9 Ø 1.5150 6.400.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.8400 7.77
22.5574 95.28
K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 30 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD5-W-022217Lab Code: K1701881-016
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 0.8476Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 0.8734Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 103.04
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 0.1911 2.13Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 0.0777 0.86Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 0.0533 0.59Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.0600 0.67Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.0535 0.60Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.1227 1.37Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.0954 1.0675.0 µm 4 Ø 0.7250 8.0731.3 µm 5 Ø 1.7850 19.8715.6 µm 6 Ø 1.5300 17.037.8 µm 7 Ø 0.9350 10.413.9 µm 8 Ø 1.2700 14.141.95 µm 9 Ø 0.5650 6.290.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.6450 18.31
9.1087 101.40
K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 31 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD1-W-022217Lab Code: K1701881-005DUP
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 2.1615Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 2.0849Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 96.46
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 0.1676 1.46Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 0.6371 5.56Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 0.3941 3.44Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.1816 1.59Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.1365 1.19Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.3015 2.63Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.1627 1.4275.0 µm 4 Ø 1.0500 9.1731.3 µm 5 Ø 1.9450 16.9815.6 µm 6 Ø 1.4300 12.487.8 µm 7 Ø 0.9450 8.253.9 µm 8 Ø 1.1200 9.781.95 µm 9 Ø 1.2400 10.830.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.4600 12.75
11.1711 97.53
K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 32 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD2-W-022217Lab Code: K1701881-009DUP
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 13.0088Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 12.9353Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.43
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 1.1937 5.67Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 4.9946 23.70Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 2.8606 13.58Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 1.5079 7.16Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 1.0679 5.07Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.9653 4.58Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.2359 1.1275.0 µm 4 Ø 0.6250 2.9731.3 µm 5 Ø 1.5450 7.3315.6 µm 6 Ø 1.2600 5.987.8 µm 7 Ø 0.9400 4.463.9 µm 8 Ø 0.7300 3.461.95 µm 9 Ø 1.0350 4.910.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.3650 6.48
20.3259 96.47
K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 33 of 58
dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report
Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017
Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017
Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M
Sample Name: DD4-M-022217Lab Code: K1701881-013DUP
Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 0.5173Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 0.5126Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.09
Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 0.0852 0.97Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 0.0032 0.04Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 0.0162 0.18Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 0.0283 0.32Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.0307 0.35Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.0509 0.58Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.0552 0.6375.0 µm 4 Ø 1.0350 11.7431.3 µm 5 Ø 0.9150 10.3815.6 µm 6 Ø 1.7300 19.637.8 µm 7 Ø 1.2400 14.073.9 µm 8 Ø 1.0300 11.691.95 µm 9 Ø 0.9200 10.440.98 µm > 10 Ø 1.5450 17.53
8.6847 98.53
K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:
Page 34 of 58
Raw Data
ALS Environmental—Kelso Laboratory 1317 South 13th Avenue, Kelso, WA 98626 Phone (360)577-7222 Fax (360)636-1068 www.alsglobal.com
RIGHT SOLUTIONS | RIGHT PARTNER
Page 35 of 58
Total Solids
ALS Environmental—Kelso Laboratory 1317 South 13th Avenue, Kelso, WA 98626 Phone (360)577-7222 Fax (360)636-1068 www.alsglobal.com
RIGHT SOLUTIONS | RIGHT PARTNER
Page 36 of 58
77.28.8010.08411.393K1701881-001 1.28941.54.505.79710.837K1701881-002 1.30176.29.4210.72412.360K1701881-003 1.30437.84.435.70611.723K1701881-004 1.27832.74.715.99214.416K1701881-005 1.28432.33.574.85411.055K1701881-005DUP 1.280 160.06.928.22411.537K1701881-006 1.30042.84.555.84110.636K1701881-007 1.29424.32.453.74510.098K1701881-008 1.29350.88.449.74516.609K1701881-009 1.30146.05.586.87912.123K1701881-009DUP 1.298 1032.03.384.68210.567K1701881-010 1.29832.74.005.29712.218K1701881-011 1.29643.84.866.15911.088K1701881-012 1.30026.62.934.21611.002K1701881-013 1.29026.53.694.98613.911K1701881-013DUP 1.297 <125.82.683.98210.381K1701881-014 1.30146.16.557.83714.193K1701881-015 1.29228.73.214.50111.155K1701881-016 1.29599.61.993.2801.999K1701880-001 1.28899.22.193.4912.208K1701880-002 1.300
Oven ID Time OutTime InTemp In Date In Date OutTemp Outk-oven-07 105 10:392/27/2017 08:022/28/2017Oven1 105
Thermometer ID
Cal End ValueCal Start Value Start DateCal EQID End DateStart Time End TimeK-BALANCE-50 0.999, 99.998 1.000, 99.997 2/27/2017 2/27/201708:53 10:39Calibration1
K-BALANCE-50 1.000, 99.997 1.000, 99.999 2/28/2017 2/28/201708:58 09:02Calibration2
BenchsheetService Request #:Test:Method:
K1701881, KQ1702113, K1701880TS160.3 Modified
Pan ID: Lab Code:Wet Wt. (g)Tare (g) Tare + Dry
Wt. (g) Dry Weight (g) % Total Solids
536188Run #:Balance ID: K-BALANCE-50
RPD
Comments: DJM Weight set serial No. 42868. Sample -2,-4 have very large rocks that didn't get included. Reviewed by SC 2/28/17
Page 37 of 58
General Chemistry
ALS Environmental—Kelso Laboratory 1317 South 13th Avenue, Kelso, WA 98626 Phone (360)577-7222 Fax (360)636-1068 www.alsglobal.com
RIGHT SOLUTIONS | RIGHT PARTNER
Page 38 of 58
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
Analytical Chemists and Consultants
Kane Environmental
RE: Navy
Seattle, WA 98103
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102
Nate Evenson
Please find enclosed sample receipt documentation and analytical results for samples from the project referenced
above.
Sample analyses were performed according to ARI's Quality Assurance Plan and any provided project specific
Quality Assurance Plan. Each analytical section of this report has been approved and reviewed by an analytical
peer, the appropriate Laboratory Supervisor or qualified substitute, and a technical reviewer.
Should you have any questions or problems, please feel free to contact us at your convenience.
17 March 2017
Associated Work Order(s) Associated SDG ID(s)
17B0342 N/A
-----
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically
and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed in the enclose Narrative. ARI, an accredited
laboratory, certifies that the report results for which ARI is accredited meets all the reqirements of the
accrediting body. A list of certified analyses, accreditations, and expiration dates is included in this report.
Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or
his/her designee, as verified by the following signature.
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
Mark Harris, Project Manager Cert# 100006
PJLA TestingAccreditation # 66169
1 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES
Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received
DD3-E-02217 17B0342-01 Solid 22-Feb-2017 09:51 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD3-M-022217 17B0342-02 Solid 22-Feb-2017 10:00 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD3-W-022217 17B0342-03 Solid 22-Feb-2017 10:10 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD3-W-022217-DUP 17B0342-04 Solid 22-Feb-2017 10:15 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD1-E-022217 17B0342-05 Solid 22-Feb-2017 10:52 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD1-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-06 Solid 22-Feb-2017 10:54 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD1-W-022217 17B0342-07 Solid 22-Feb-2017 10:58 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD1-M-022217 17B0342-08 Solid 22-Feb-2017 11:04 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD2-E-022217 17B0342-09 Solid 22-Feb-2017 12:00 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD2-M-022217 17B0342-10 Solid 22-Feb-2017 12:06 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD2-W-022217 17B0342-11 Solid 22-Feb-2017 12:11 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD4-W-022217 17B0342-12 Solid 22-Feb-2017 13:00 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD4-E-022217 17B0342-13 Solid 22-Feb-2017 13:07 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD4-M-022217 17B0342-14 Solid 22-Feb-2017 13:11 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD5-E-022217 17B0342-15 Solid 22-Feb-2017 13:44 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD5-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-16 Solid 22-Feb-2017 13:46 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD5-M-022217 17B0342-17 Solid 22-Feb-2017 13:49 23-Feb-2017 17:50
DD5-W-022217 17B0342-18 Solid 22-Feb-2017 13:53 23-Feb-2017 17:50
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
5 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
Client: Kane Environmental
Project: Navy
Workorder: 17B0342
Sample receipt
18 samples were received 23-Feb-2017 17:50 under ARI work order 17B0342. For details regarding sample receipt, please
refer to the Cooler Receipt Form.
PCB Aroclors - EPA Method SW8082A
These samples were extracted and analyzed within the recommended holding times.
All initial and continuing calibrations were within method requirements.
The areas for all internal standards were within acceptable QC limits.
The percent recoveries for all surrogates were within established QC limits.
No target compounds were detected in the method blank above the LOQs.
The percent recoveries for all compounds were within acceptable QC limits for the LCS.
A matrix spike (MS) and a matrix spike duplicate (MSD) were extracted and analyzed in conjunction with sample
'DD2-M-022217'. The percent recoveries and RPDs were within acceptable QC limits for the MS/MSD.
Total Metals - EPA Methods 6010C/7471B
These samples were digested and analyzed within the recommended holding times.
All initial and continuing calibrations were within method requirements.
No target elements were detected in the method blanks above the LOQs.
The percent recoveries for all elements were within acceptable QC limits for the LCSs.
Matrix spikes (MSs) and matrix spike duplicates (MSDs) were prepared and analyzed in conjunction with sample
'DD3-E-02217'. The percent recoveries for zinc and mercury were high following the analyses of the MSs. The percent
recovery for mercury was high following the analysis of the MSD. The RPD for mercury was high following the analyses of
the MS/MSD. Since the percent recoveries for all elements were within acceptable QC limits for the corresponding LCSs and
SRMs, it was concluded that the sample matrix was the cause of the high MS results. No corrective actions were taken.
Matrix duplicates (MDs) were prepared and analyzed in conjunction with sample 'DD3-E-02217'.The RPDs for lead and
Case Narrative
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
6 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
mercury were high following the analyses of the MDs. Since the percent recoveries for all elements were within acceptable
QC limits for the corresponding LCSs and SRMs, it was concluded that a lack of sample homogeneity was the cause of the
high RPDs. No corrective actions were taken.
The RPD for arsenic was high following the analysis of the dilution check analyzed in conjunction with sample
'DD3-E-02217'. Since the percent recoveries for arsenic were within acceptable QC limits for the corresponding LCS and
SRM, no corrective actions were taken.
TOC/TS - Methods Plumb, 1981/SM2540-G
These samples were prepared and analyzed within the recommended holding times.
All initial and continuing calibrations were within method requirements.
No target compounds were detected in the method blanks above the LOQs.
The percent recovery for TOC was within acceptable QC limits for the SRM.
A matrix spike (MS) and a matrix spike duplicate (MSD) were prepared and analyzed in conjunction with sample
'DD5-M-022217'. The percent recoveries and RPD were within acceptable QC limits for the MS/MSD.
A matrix duplicate (MD) and a matrix triplicate (MT) were prepared and analyzed in conjunction with sample
'DD5-M-022217'. The RPD and %RSD were within acceptable QC limits for the MD and the MT.
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
7 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-E-02217
17B0342-01 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 09:51
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/03/2017 20:20
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 7.21 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.83 g
% Solids: 80.91
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 03-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg17.16.912674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg17.16.911104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg17.16.911141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg17.16.953469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg17.16.912672-29-6 UAroclor 1248
25.21 ug/kg17.16.911097-69-1Aroclor 1254
17.21 ug/kg17.18.011096-82-5Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg17.18.037324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg17.18.011100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 98.4 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 90.1 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 98.8 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 100 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
8 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-E-02217
17B0342-01 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 09:51
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.78 g
% Solids: 78.44
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
78.441 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
9 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-E-02217
17B0342-01RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 09:51
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 10:19
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.028 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.78 g
% Solids: 76.30
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
19.45 mg/kg15.97440-38-2 DArsenic
ND5 mg/kg0.6377440-43-9 UCadmium
20.05 mg/kg1.597440-47-3 DChromium
64.55 mg/kg0.6377440-50-8 DCopper
28.45 mg/kg6.377439-92-1 DLead
20.85 mg/kg3.197440-02-0 DNickel
ND5 mg/kg0.9567440-22-4 USilver
1535 mg/kg3.197440-66-6 DZinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
10 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-E-02217
17B0342-01RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 09:51
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 14:35
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.23 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.18 g
% Solids: 76.30
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
0.31911 mg/kg0.028497439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
11 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-E-02217
17B0342-01RE1 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 09:51
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 10:38
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.78 g
% Solids: 78.44
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
0.291 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
12 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-M-022217
17B0342-02 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:00
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/03/2017 20:47
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 11.08 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.17 g
% Solids: 46.70
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 03-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg19.37.712674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg19.37.711104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg19.37.711141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg19.37.753469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg29.029.012672-29-6 Y1Aroclor 1248
69.81 ug/kg19.37.711097-69-1Aroclor 1254
76.11 ug/kg19.39.011096-82-5Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg19.39.037324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg19.39.011100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 106 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 98.8 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 101 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 98.4 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
13 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-M-022217
17B0342-02 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:00
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 10:48
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.44 g
% Solids: 44.07
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
1.261 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
14 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-M-022217
17B0342-02 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:00
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.44 g
% Solids: 44.07
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
44.071 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
15 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-M-022217
17B0342-02RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:00
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 10:07
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.08 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.42 g
% Solids: 38.54
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
49.62 mg/kg12.07440-38-2Arsenic
1.872 mg/kg0.4817440-43-9Cadmium
50.02 mg/kg1.207440-47-3Chromium
2462 mg/kg0.4817440-50-8Copper
1362 mg/kg4.817439-92-1Lead
47.12 mg/kg2.407440-02-0Nickel
0.7892 mg/kg0.7217440-22-4Silver
4282 mg/kg2.407440-66-6Zinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
16 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-M-022217
17B0342-02RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:00
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:33
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.222 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.09 g
% Solids: 38.54
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
0.49091 mg/kg0.058447439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
17 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-W-022217
17B0342-03 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:10
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/03/2017 21:14
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 7.1 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.42 g
% Solids: 76.39
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg18.47.412674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg18.47.411104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg18.47.411141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg18.47.453469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg18.47.412672-29-6 UAroclor 1248
73.91 ug/kg18.47.411097-69-1Aroclor 1254
3321 ug/kg18.48.611096-82-5 P1Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg18.48.637324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg18.48.611100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 101 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 79.6 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 94.5 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 86.1 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
18 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-W-022217
17B0342-03 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:10
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 10:57
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.75 g
% Solids: 75.30
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
0.581 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
19 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-W-022217
17B0342-03 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:10
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.75 g
% Solids: 75.30
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
75.301 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
20 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-W-022217
17B0342-03RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:10
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 10:11
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.015 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.74 g
% Solids: 73.22
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
1875 mg/kg16.87440-38-2 DArsenic
0.8265 mg/kg0.6737440-43-9 DCadmium
40.75 mg/kg1.687440-47-3 DChromium
5115 mg/kg0.6737440-50-8 DCopper
5465 mg/kg6.737439-92-1 DLead
65.45 mg/kg3.367440-02-0 DNickel
1.915 mg/kg1.017440-22-4 DSilver
24705 mg/kg3.367440-66-6 DZinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
21 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-W-022217
17B0342-03RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:10
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:34
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.223 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.16 g
% Solids: 73.22
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
1.8221 mg/kg0.030627439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
22 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-W-022217-DUP
17B0342-04 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:15
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 11:06
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.78 g
% Solids: 77.85
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
0.721 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
23 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD3-W-022217-DUP
17B0342-04 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:15
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.78 g
% Solids: 77.85
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
77.851 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
24 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-E-022217
17B0342-05 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:52
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/03/2017 21:41
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 13.16 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.25 g
% Solids: 39.90
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg19.07.612674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg19.07.611104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg19.07.611141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg19.07.653469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg19.07.612672-29-6 UAroclor 1248
64.01 ug/kg19.07.611097-69-1Aroclor 1254
47.11 ug/kg19.08.811096-82-5Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg19.08.837324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg19.08.811100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 97.6 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 86.4 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 97.5 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 92.7 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
25 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-E-022217
17B0342-05 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:52
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 11:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.41 g
% Solids: 40.60
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
1.821 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
26 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-E-022217
17B0342-05 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:52
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.41 g
% Solids: 40.60
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
40.601 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
27 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-E-022217
17B0342-05RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:52
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 13:27
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.083 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.46 g
% Solids: 42.65
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
32.05 mg/kg27.17440-38-2 DArsenic
ND5 mg/kg1.087440-43-9 UCadmium
35.95 mg/kg2.717440-47-3 DChromium
2375 mg/kg1.087440-50-8 DCopper
66.25 mg/kg10.87439-92-1 DLead
27.45 mg/kg5.417440-02-0 DNickel
ND5 mg/kg1.627440-22-4 USilver
3245 mg/kg5.417440-66-6 DZinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
28 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-E-022217
17B0342-05RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:52
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:36
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.238 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.10 g
% Solids: 42.65
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
0.83741 mg/kg0.049267439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
29 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-E-022217-DUP
17B0342-06RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:54
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 10:53
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.059 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.38 g
% Solids: 35.82
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
27.62 mg/kg13.27440-38-2Arsenic
1.442 mg/kg0.5277440-43-9Cadmium
41.92 mg/kg1.327440-47-3Chromium
2702 mg/kg0.5277440-50-8Copper
76.32 mg/kg5.277439-92-1Lead
33.92 mg/kg2.647440-02-0Nickel
ND2 mg/kg0.7917440-22-4 USilver
3322 mg/kg2.647440-66-6Zinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
30 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-E-022217-DUP
17B0342-06RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:54
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:37
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.233 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.08 g
% Solids: 35.82
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
0.98851 mg/kg0.059917439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
31 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-W-022217
17B0342-07 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:58
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/03/2017 23:03
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 16.18 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.21 g
% Solids: 32.21
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg19.27.712674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg19.27.711104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg19.27.711141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg19.27.753469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg19.27.712672-29-6 UAroclor 1248
1601 ug/kg19.27.711097-69-1Aroclor 1254
1041 ug/kg19.28.911096-82-5 P1Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg19.28.937324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg19.28.911100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 104 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 90.9 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 100 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 92.7 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
32 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-W-022217
17B0342-07 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:58
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 12:03
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.33 g
% Solids: 32.65
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
2.811 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
33 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-W-022217
17B0342-07 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:58
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.33 g
% Solids: 32.65
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
32.651 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
34 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-W-022217
17B0342-07RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:58
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 10:57
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.028 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.32 g
% Solids: 31.08
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
41.72 mg/kg15.67440-38-2Arsenic
2.272 mg/kg0.6267440-43-9Cadmium
70.12 mg/kg1.567440-47-3Chromium
2452 mg/kg0.6267440-50-8Copper
1522 mg/kg6.267439-92-1Lead
50.92 mg/kg3.137440-02-0Nickel
ND2 mg/kg0.9397440-22-4 USilver
4532 mg/kg3.137440-66-6Zinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
35 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-W-022217
17B0342-07RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 10:58
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:39
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.226 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.07 g
% Solids: 31.08
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
1.3951 mg/kg0.071187439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
36 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-M-022217
17B0342-08 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 11:04
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/03/2017 23:30
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 9.26 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.42 g
% Solids: 58.53
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg18.57.412674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg18.57.411104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg18.57.411141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg18.57.453469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg27.727.712672-29-6 Y1Aroclor 1248
65.81 ug/kg18.57.411097-69-1Aroclor 1254
57.41 ug/kg18.58.611096-82-5Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg18.58.637324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg18.58.611100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 94.3 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 79.5 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 91.3 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 85.4 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
37 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-M-022217
17B0342-08 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 11:04
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 12:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.60 g
% Solids: 59.68
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
2.351 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
38 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-M-022217
17B0342-08 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 11:04
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.60 g
% Solids: 59.68
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
59.681 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
39 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-M-022217
17B0342-08RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 11:04
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 11:01
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.025 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.59 g
% Solids: 57.27
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
23.82 mg/kg8.527440-38-2Arsenic
1.032 mg/kg0.3417440-43-9Cadmium
42.82 mg/kg0.8527440-47-3Chromium
1302 mg/kg0.3417440-50-8Copper
1032 mg/kg3.417439-92-1Lead
38.82 mg/kg1.707440-02-0Nickel
ND2 mg/kg0.5117440-22-4 USilver
2222 mg/kg1.707440-66-6Zinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
40 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD1-M-022217
17B0342-08RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 11:04
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:41
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.223 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.13 g
% Solids: 57.27
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
1.2371 mg/kg0.039157439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
41 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-E-022217
17B0342-09 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:00
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/03/2017 23:57
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 10.04 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.01 g
% Solids: 49.87
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg20.08.012674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg20.08.011104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg20.08.011141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg20.08.053469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg39.939.912672-29-6 Y1, UAroclor 1248
1431 ug/kg20.08.011097-69-1Aroclor 1254
1811 ug/kg20.09.311096-82-5 P1Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg20.09.337324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg20.09.311100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 104 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 77.2 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 73.5 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 84.6 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
42 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-E-022217
17B0342-09 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:00
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 12:25
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.45 g
% Solids: 45.04
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
1.221 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
43 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-E-022217
17B0342-09 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:00
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.45 g
% Solids: 45.04
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
45.041 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
44 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-E-022217
17B0342-09RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:00
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 11:05
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.007 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.43 g
% Solids: 42.84
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
1215 mg/kg29.07440-38-2 DArsenic
ND5 mg/kg1.167440-43-9 UCadmium
61.35 mg/kg2.907440-47-3 DChromium
8155 mg/kg1.167440-50-8 DCopper
2195 mg/kg11.67439-92-1 DLead
59.05 mg/kg5.807440-02-0 DNickel
ND5 mg/kg1.747440-22-4 USilver
8085 mg/kg5.807440-66-6 DZinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
45 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-E-022217
17B0342-09RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:00
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:42
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.223 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.10 g
% Solids: 42.84
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
1.3921 mg/kg0.052347439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
46 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-M-022217
17B0342-10 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:06
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/04/2017 00:24
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 21.11 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.10 g
% Solids: 24.14
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg19.67.812674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg19.67.811104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg19.67.811141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg19.67.853469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg19.67.812672-29-6 UAroclor 1248
93.11 ug/kg19.67.811097-69-1Aroclor 1254
76.91 ug/kg19.69.111096-82-5Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg19.69.137324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg19.69.111100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 94.0 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 85.5 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 95.3 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 90.4 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
47 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-M-022217
17B0342-10 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:06
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.24 g
% Solids: 24.30
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
24.301 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
48 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-M-022217
17B0342-10RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:06
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 11:09
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.018 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.24 g
% Solids: 23.50
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
32.72 mg/kg20.97440-38-2Arsenic
2.732 mg/kg0.8367440-43-9Cadmium
58.02 mg/kg2.097440-47-3Chromium
1992 mg/kg0.8367440-50-8Copper
79.72 mg/kg8.367439-92-1Lead
46.72 mg/kg4.187440-02-0Nickel
ND2 mg/kg1.257440-22-4 USilver
2902 mg/kg4.187440-66-6Zinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
49 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-M-022217
17B0342-10RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:06
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:51
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.225 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.05 g
% Solids: 23.50
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
0.86051 mg/kg0.094567439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
50 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-M-022217
17B0342-10RE1 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:06
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 12:42
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.24 g
% Solids: 24.30
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
2.841 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
51 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-W-022217
17B0342-11 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:11
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/04/2017 01:46
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 11.21 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.38 g
% Solids: 47.96
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg18.67.412674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg18.67.411104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg18.67.411141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg18.67.453469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg18.67.412672-29-6 UAroclor 1248
82.91 ug/kg18.67.411097-69-1Aroclor 1254
83.91 ug/kg18.68.611096-82-5Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg18.68.637324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg18.68.611100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 93.8 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 79.1 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 94.3 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 86.5 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
52 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-W-022217
17B0342-11 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:11
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 12:59
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.48 g
% Solids: 47.99
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
2.641 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
53 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-W-022217
17B0342-11 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:11
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.48 g
% Solids: 47.99
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
47.991 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
54 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-W-022217
17B0342-11RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:11
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 11:13
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.011 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.46 g
% Solids: 45.75
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
25.52 mg/kg10.87440-38-2Arsenic
0.8412 mg/kg0.4327440-43-9Cadmium
36.32 mg/kg1.087440-47-3Chromium
1302 mg/kg0.4327440-50-8Copper
70.42 mg/kg4.327439-92-1Lead
32.82 mg/kg2.167440-02-0Nickel
ND2 mg/kg0.6497440-22-4 USilver
2172 mg/kg2.167440-66-6Zinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
55 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD2-W-022217
17B0342-11RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 12:11
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:52
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.234 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.11 g
% Solids: 45.75
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
0.83131 mg/kg0.046707439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
56 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-W-022217
17B0342-12 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:00
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/04/2017 02:13
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 16.12 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.29 g
% Solids: 32.79
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg18.97.612674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg18.97.611104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg18.97.611141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg18.97.653469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg37.837.812672-29-6 Y1Aroclor 1248
1711 ug/kg18.97.611097-69-1Aroclor 1254
1311 ug/kg18.98.811096-82-5Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg18.98.837324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg18.98.811100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 95.7 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 82.8 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 94.2 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 87.1 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
57 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-W-022217
17B0342-12 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:00
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 13:08
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.33 g
% Solids: 33.22
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
2.551 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
58 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-W-022217
17B0342-12 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:00
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.33 g
% Solids: 33.22
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
33.221 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
59 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-W-022217
17B0342-12RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:00
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 11:18
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.091 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.35 g
% Solids: 31.72
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
45.62 mg/kg14.47440-38-2Arsenic
2.222 mg/kg0.5787440-43-9Cadmium
67.72 mg/kg1.447440-47-3Chromium
3312 mg/kg0.5787440-50-8Copper
1052 mg/kg5.787439-92-1Lead
58.72 mg/kg2.897440-02-0Nickel
ND2 mg/kg0.8677440-22-4 USilver
5012 mg/kg2.897440-66-6Zinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
60 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-W-022217
17B0342-12RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:00
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:54
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.274 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.09 g
% Solids: 31.72
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
1.4501 mg/kg0.057537439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
61 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-E-022217
17B0342-13 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:07
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/04/2017 02:41
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 11.2 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.10 g
% Solids: 45.58
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg19.67.812674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg19.67.811104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg19.67.811141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg19.67.853469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg29.429.412672-29-6 Y1Aroclor 1248
1421 ug/kg19.67.811097-69-1Aroclor 1254
1221 ug/kg19.69.111096-82-5Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg19.69.137324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg19.69.111100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 92.6 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 83.2 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 90.0 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 87.1 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
62 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-E-022217
17B0342-13 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:07
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 13:20
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.46 g
% Solids: 46.37
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
0.901 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
63 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-E-022217
17B0342-13 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:07
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.46 g
% Solids: 46.37
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
46.371 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
64 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-E-022217
17B0342-13RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:07
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 11:22
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.05 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.40 g
% Solids: 38.02
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
33.65 mg/kg31.37440-38-2 DArsenic
ND5 mg/kg1.257440-43-9 UCadmium
43.05 mg/kg3.137440-47-3 DChromium
2955 mg/kg1.257440-50-8 DCopper
54.35 mg/kg12.57439-92-1 DLead
33.25 mg/kg6.267440-02-0 DNickel
ND5 mg/kg1.887440-22-4 USilver
3115 mg/kg6.267440-66-6 DZinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
65 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-E-022217
17B0342-13RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:07
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:55
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.234 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.09 g
% Solids: 38.02
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
0.81491 mg/kg0.056207439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
66 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-M-022217
17B0342-14 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:11
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/04/2017 04:02
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 19.05 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.11 g
% Solids: 26.82
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg19.67.812674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg19.67.811104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg19.67.811141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg19.67.853469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg39.239.212672-29-6 Y1, UAroclor 1248
1441 ug/kg19.67.811097-69-1Aroclor 1254
1361 ug/kg19.69.111096-82-5Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg19.69.137324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg19.69.111100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 102 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 83.2 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 99.2 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 93.2 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
67 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-M-022217
17B0342-14 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:11
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 13:30
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.27 g
% Solids: 26.83
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
2.201 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
68 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-M-022217
17B0342-14 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:11
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.27 g
% Solids: 26.83
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
26.831 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
69 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-M-022217
17B0342-14RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:11
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 11:26
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.01 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.27 g
% Solids: 26.52
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
35.22 mg/kg18.77440-38-2Arsenic
2.092 mg/kg0.7477440-43-9Cadmium
59.02 mg/kg1.877440-47-3Chromium
2322 mg/kg0.7477440-50-8Copper
90.02 mg/kg7.477439-92-1Lead
46.72 mg/kg3.737440-02-0Nickel
ND2 mg/kg1.127440-22-4 USilver
2922 mg/kg3.737440-66-6Zinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
70 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD4-M-022217
17B0342-14RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:11
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:57
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.243 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.06 g
% Solids: 26.52
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
0.88451 mg/kg0.077597439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
71 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-E-022217
17B0342-15 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:44
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/04/2017 04:30
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 20.06 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.20 g
% Solids: 25.92
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg19.27.712674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg19.27.711104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg19.27.711141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg19.27.753469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg28.828.812672-29-6 Y1Aroclor 1248
97.71 ug/kg19.27.711097-69-1Aroclor 1254
80.91 ug/kg19.28.911096-82-5Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg19.28.937324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg19.28.911100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 92.7 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 82.7 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 92.1 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 88.3 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
72 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-E-022217
17B0342-15 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:44
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 13:54
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.26 g
% Solids: 25.94
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
3.161 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
73 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-E-022217
17B0342-15 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:44
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.26 g
% Solids: 25.94
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
25.941 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
74 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-E-022217
17B0342-15RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:44
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 11:47
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.042 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.27 g
% Solids: 25.68
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
33.62 mg/kg18.77440-38-2Arsenic
1.812 mg/kg0.7477440-43-9Cadmium
61.22 mg/kg1.877440-47-3Chromium
1612 mg/kg0.7477440-50-8Copper
73.62 mg/kg7.477439-92-1Lead
45.22 mg/kg3.747440-02-0Nickel
ND2 mg/kg1.127440-22-4 USilver
2712 mg/kg3.747440-66-6Zinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
75 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-E-022217
17B0342-15RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:44
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 13:59
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.226 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.06 g
% Solids: 25.68
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
0.74951 mg/kg0.086157439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
76 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-E-022217-DUP
17B0342-16 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:46
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/04/2017 04:57
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 20.07 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.18 g
% Solids: 25.81
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg19.37.712674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg19.37.711104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg19.37.711141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg19.37.753469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg29.029.012672-29-6 Y1Aroclor 1248
1011 ug/kg19.37.711097-69-1Aroclor 1254
83.41 ug/kg19.39.011096-82-5Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg19.39.037324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg19.39.011100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 96.5 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 85.9 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 92.7 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 88.2 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
77 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-M-022217
17B0342-17 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:49
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/04/2017 05:24
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 12.04 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.20 g
% Solids: 43.15
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg19.27.712674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg19.27.711104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg19.27.711141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg19.27.753469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg19.27.712672-29-6 UAroclor 1248
65.51 ug/kg19.27.711097-69-1Aroclor 1254
54.01 ug/kg19.28.911096-82-5 P1Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg19.28.937324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg19.28.911100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 93.1 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 83.3 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 92.4 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 89.5 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
78 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-M-022217
17B0342-17 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:49
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 14:29
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.42 g
% Solids: 41.93
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
1.791 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
79 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-M-022217
17B0342-17 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:49
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.42 g
% Solids: 41.93
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
41.931 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
80 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-M-022217
17B0342-17RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:49
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 13:32
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.031 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.26 g
% Solids: 25.15
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
45.82 mg/kg19.37440-38-2Arsenic
1.972 mg/kg0.7717440-43-9Cadmium
66.12 mg/kg1.937440-47-3Chromium
2192 mg/kg0.7717440-50-8Copper
1012 mg/kg7.717439-92-1Lead
56.32 mg/kg3.867440-02-0Nickel
ND2 mg/kg1.167440-22-4 USilver
4492 mg/kg3.867440-66-6Zinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
81 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-M-022217
17B0342-17RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:49
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 14:00
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.205 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.05 g
% Solids: 25.15
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
0.81461 mg/kg0.096987439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
82 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-W-022217
17B0342-18 (Solid)
Aroclor PCB
Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:53
Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/04/2017 05:51
Preparation Batch: BFB0651
Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL
Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:
Sample Size: 17.21 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.04 g
% Solids: 29.29
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid
Cleanup Batch: CFC0009
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Sample Cleanup:
Final Volume: 5 mL
Initial Volume: 5 mL
Cleanup Method: Sulfur
Cleanup Batch: CFC0010
Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte
Detection
LimitCAS Number
ND1 ug/kg19.87.912674-11-2 UAroclor 1016
ND1 ug/kg19.87.911104-28-2 UAroclor 1221
ND1 ug/kg19.87.911141-16-5 UAroclor 1232
ND1 ug/kg19.87.953469-21-9 UAroclor 1242
ND1 ug/kg19.87.912672-29-6 UAroclor 1248
84.91 ug/kg19.87.911097-69-1Aroclor 1254
80.01 ug/kg19.89.211096-82-5 P1Aroclor 1260
ND1 ug/kg19.89.237324-23-5 UAroclor 1262
ND1 ug/kg19.89.211100-14-4 UAroclor 1268
40-133 % 92.3 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
53-120 % 80.9 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene
40-133 % 101 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]
53-120 % 87.6 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
83 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-W-022217
17B0342-18 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:53
Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 15:29
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.29 g
% Solids: 28.97
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
2.901 %0.02Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
84 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-W-022217
17B0342-18 (Solid)
Wet Chemistry
Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:53
Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16
Preparation Batch: BFB0656
Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g
Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.29 g
% Solids: 28.97
Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number
28.971 %0.04Total Solids
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
85 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-W-022217
17B0342-18RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:53
Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 11:56
Preparation Batch: BFC0180
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:00 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 1.057 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.30 g
% Solids: 28.57
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
33.62 mg/kg16.67440-38-2Arsenic
2.242 mg/kg0.6627440-43-9Cadmium
56.62 mg/kg1.667440-47-3Chromium
2002 mg/kg0.6627440-50-8Copper
75.62 mg/kg6.627439-92-1Lead
45.42 mg/kg3.317440-02-0Nickel
ND2 mg/kg0.9937440-22-4 USilver
2992 mg/kg3.317440-66-6Zinc
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
86 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
DD5-W-022217
17B0342-18RE1 (Solid)
Metals and Metallic Compounds
Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 13:53
Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 14:02
Preparation Batch: BFC0181
Prepared: 03/08/2017 11:30 Final Volume: 50 mL
Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:
Sample Size: 0.228 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.07 g
% Solids: 28.57
Analyte Limit
Reporting
Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number
0.70621 mg/kg0.076767439-97-6Mercury
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
87 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
Aroclor PCB - Quality Control
Batch BFB0651 - EPA 3546 (Microwave)
Instrument: ECD7
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes QC Sample/Analyte
Detection
Limit
Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 03-Mar-2017 18:58Blank (BFB0651-BLK1)
20.0ND U8.0Aroclor 1016 ug/kg
20.0ND U8.0Aroclor 1221 ug/kg
20.0ND U8.0Aroclor 1232 ug/kg
20.0ND U8.0Aroclor 1242 ug/kg
20.0ND U8.0Aroclor 1248 ug/kg
20.0ND U8.0Aroclor 1254 ug/kg
20.0ND U9.3Aroclor 1260 ug/kg
20.0ND U9.3Aroclor 1262 ug/kg
20.0ND U9.3Aroclor 1268 ug/kg
40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 97.2 %40.038.9 ug/kg
53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene 87.0 %40.034.8 ug/kg
40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 95.0 %40.038.0 ug/kg
53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C] 98.4 %40.039.4 ug/kg
Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 03-Mar-2017 19:25LCS (BFB0651-BS1)
20.0408 52-12081.7 %5008.0Aroclor 1016 ug/kg
20.0431 57-12086.3 %5009.3Aroclor 1260 ug/kg
40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 99.6 %40.039.8 ug/kg
53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene 89.3 %40.035.7 ug/kg
40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 97.0 %40.038.8 ug/kg
53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C] 98.5 %40.039.4 ug/kg
Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 04-Mar-2017 00:52Source: 17B0342-10Matrix Spike (BFB0651-MS1)
19.7353 ND 52-12071.8 %4927.9Aroclor 1016 ug/kg
19.7436 111 57-12066.0 %4929.1Aroclor 1260 ug/kg
36.9 40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 97.2 %39.438.3 ug/kg
33.5 53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene 86.1 %39.433.9 ug/kg
37.4 40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 95.9 %39.437.7 ug/kg
35.5 53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C] 89.7 %39.435.3 ug/kg
Recovery limits for target analytes in MS/MSD QC samples are advisory only.
Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 04-Mar-2017 01:19Source: 17B0342-10Matrix Spike Dup (BFB0651-MSD1)
19.7335 ND 3052-12068.1 % 5.364927.9Aroclor 1016 ug/kg
19.7427 111 3057-12064.1 % 2.154929.1Aroclor 1260 ug/kg
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
88 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
Aroclor PCB - Quality Control
Batch BFB0651 - EPA 3546 (Microwave)
Instrument: ECD7
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes QC Sample/Analyte
Detection
Limit
Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 04-Mar-2017 01:19Source: 17B0342-10Matrix Spike Dup (BFB0651-MSD1)
36.9 40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 91.0 %39.335.8 ug/kg
33.5 53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene 82.0 %39.332.2 ug/kg
37.4 40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 91.0 %39.335.8 ug/kg
35.5 53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C] 85.9 %39.333.8 ug/kg
Recovery limits for target analytes in MS/MSD QC samples are advisory only.
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
89 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
Metals and Metallic Compounds - Quality Control
Batch BFC0180 - SWC EPA 3050B
Instrument: ICP2
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes QC Sample/Analyte
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:00Blank (BFC0180-BLK1)
5.00ND UArsenic mg/kg
0.200ND UCadmium mg/kg
0.500ND UChromium mg/kg
0.200ND UCopper mg/kg
2.00ND ULead mg/kg
1.00ND UNickel mg/kg
0.300ND USilver mg/kg
1.00ND UZinc mg/kg
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:36LCS (BFC0180-BS1)
5.00204 80-120102 %200Arsenic mg/kg
0.20049.6 80-12099.1 %50.0Cadmium mg/kg
0.50052.6 80-120105 %50.0Chromium mg/kg
0.20049.9 80-12099.7 %50.0Copper mg/kg
2.00204 80-120102 %200Lead mg/kg
1.0052.6 80-120105 %50.0Nickel mg/kg
0.30051.7 80-120103 %50.0Silver mg/kg
1.0052.2 80-120104 %50.0Zinc mg/kg
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:23Source: 17B0342-01RE1Duplicate (BFC0180-DUP1)
15.919.0 19.4 202.10 DArsenic mg/kg
0.636ND ND U, DCadmium mg/kg
1.5922.8 20.0 2012.90 DChromium mg/kg
0.63677.5 64.5 2018.20 DCopper mg/kg
6.3636.3 28.4 2024.30 *, DLead mg/kg
3.1821.8 20.8 204.69 DNickel mg/kg
0.954ND ND USilver mg/kg
3.18138 153 2010.70 DZinc mg/kg
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:28Source: 17B0342-01RE1Matrix Spike (BFC0180-MS1)
15.9280 19.4 75-125102 %255 DArsenic mg/kg
0.63765.5 ND 75-125102 %63.7 DCadmium mg/kg
1.5987.0 20.0 75-125105 %63.7 DChromium mg/kg
0.637125 64.5 75-12595.6 %63.7 DCopper mg/kg
6.37292 28.4 75-125103 %255 DLead mg/kg
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
90 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
Metals and Metallic Compounds - Quality Control
Batch BFC0180 - SWC EPA 3050B
Instrument: ICP2
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes QC Sample/Analyte
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:28Source: 17B0342-01RE1Matrix Spike (BFC0180-MS1)
3.1987.8 20.8 75-125105 %63.7 DNickel mg/kg
0.95664.8 ND 75-125102 %63.7 DSilver mg/kg
3.19250 153 75-125153 %63.7 *, DZinc mg/kg
Recovery limits for target analytes in MS/MSD QC samples are advisory only.
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:32Source: 17B0342-01RE1Matrix Spike Dup (BFC0180-MSD1)
16.0286 19.4 2075-125104 % 2.13256 DArsenic mg/kg
0.64066.1 ND 2075-125103 % 0.8864.0 DCadmium mg/kg
1.6088.2 20.0 2075-125107 % 1.2964.0 DChromium mg/kg
0.640124 64.5 2075-12592.9 % 1.1864.0 DCopper mg/kg
6.40295 28.4 2075-125104 % 1.11256 DLead mg/kg
3.2084.1 20.8 2075-12598.9 % 4.3464.0 DNickel mg/kg
0.96067.0 ND 2075-125105 % 3.3064.0 DSilver mg/kg
3.20227 153 2075-125115 % 9.9264.0 DZinc mg/kg
Recovery limits for target analytes in MS/MSD QC samples are advisory only.
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 12:12Source: 17B0342-01RE1Post Spike (BFC0180-PS1)
5.27 153 80-120115 %2.50 DZinc mg/kg
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:15Source: 17B0342-01RE1Dilution Check (BFC0180-SRL1)
79.7ND 19.4 1018.80 U, DArsenic mg/kg
3.19ND ND U, DCadmium mg/kg
7.9720.7 20.0 103.66 DChromium mg/kg
3.1964.7 64.5 100.21 DCopper mg/kg
31.9ND 28.4 105.35 U, DLead mg/kg
15.922.5 20.8 107.63 DNickel mg/kg
4.78ND ND USilver mg/kg
15.9162 153 105.78 DZinc mg/kg
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:04SRM: E001354Reference (BFC0180-SRM1)
4.99125 78.7-121.9110 %114Arsenic mg/kg
0.19997.6 82.8-117105 %93.2Cadmium mg/kg
0.499115 79.7-120.2105 %109Chromium mg/kg
0.199124 81.2-118102 %122Copper mg/kg
1.99107 81.3-117.6105 %102Lead mg/kg
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
91 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
Metals and Metallic Compounds - Quality Control
Batch BFC0180 - SWC EPA 3050B
Instrument: ICP2
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes QC Sample/Analyte
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:04SRM: E001354Reference (BFC0180-SRM1)
0.99785.0 82.9-117.2107 %79.7Nickel mg/kg
0.29942.5 75.4-124.6102 %41.8Silver mg/kg
0.997243 81.9-118.5107 %227Zinc mg/kg
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
92 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
Metals and Metallic Compounds - Quality Control
Batch BFC0181 - SMM EPA 7471B
Instrument: CETAC
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes QC Sample/Analyte
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 10-Mar-2017 13:19Blank (BFC0181-BLK1)
0.02500ND UMercury mg/kg
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 10-Mar-2017 13:21LCS (BFC0181-BS1)
0.025000.5750 80-120115 %0.5000Mercury mg/kg
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 10-Mar-2017 14:37Source: 17B0342-01RE1Duplicate (BFC0181-DUP1)
0.028870.2569 0.3191 2021.60 *Mercury mg/kg
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 10-Mar-2017 14:38Source: 17B0342-01RE1Matrix Spike (BFC0181-MS1)
0.028870.7015 0.3191 75-125132 %0.2887 *Mercury mg/kg
Recovery limits for target analytes in MS/MSD QC samples are advisory only.
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 10-Mar-2017 14:40Source: 17B0342-01RE1Matrix Spike Dup (BFC0181-MSD1)
0.028870.9757 0.3191 2075-125227 % 32.700.2887 *Mercury mg/kg
Recovery limits for target analytes in MS/MSD QC samples are advisory only.
Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 10-Mar-2017 14:04SRM: E001354Reference (BFC0181-SRM1)
0.25009.475 72-128.2101 %9.360 DMercury mg/kg
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
93 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
Wet Chemistry - Quality Control
Batch BFB0656 - No Prep Wet Chem
Instrument: APOLLO1
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes QC Sample/Analyte
Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 08-Mar-2017 09:39Blank (BFB0656-BLK1)
0.02ND UTotal Organic Carbon %
0.04ND UTotal Solids %
Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 08-Mar-2017 14:39Source: 17B0342-17Duplicate (BFB0656-DUP1)
0.021.54 1.79 2014.70Total Organic Carbon %
0.0445.66 41.93 208.51Total Solids %
Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 08-Mar-2017 14:46Source: 17B0342-17Duplicate (BFB0656-DUP2)
0.021.73 1.79 203.52Total Organic Carbon %
0.0444.56 41.93 206.09Total Solids %
Prepared: 06-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 08-Mar-2017 15:05Source: 17B0342-17Matrix Spike (BFB0656-MS1)
0.025.92 1.79 75-125115 %3.60Total Organic Carbon %
Recovery limits for target analytes in MS/MSD QC samples are advisory only.
Prepared: 06-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 08-Mar-2017 15:12Source: 17B0342-17Matrix Spike Dup (BFB0656-MSD1)
0.025.71 1.79 20075-12591.1 % 3.744.30Total Organic Carbon %
Recovery limits for target analytes in MS/MSD QC samples are advisory only.
Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 08-Mar-2017 10:19SRM: E007832DL (BFB0656-SRM2)
0.022.40 75-12589.2 %2.69Total Organic Carbon %
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
94 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
Certified Analyses included in this Report
CertificationsAnalyte
EPA 6010C in Solid
NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAPSilver
NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAP,ADECArsenic
NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAP,ADECCadmium
NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAP,ADECChromium
NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAPCopper
NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAP,ADECNickel
NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAP,ADECLead
NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAPZinc
EPA 7471B in Solid
WADOE,NELAP,DoD-ELAP,CALAPMercury
EPA 8082A in Solid
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1016
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1016 [2C]
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1221
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1221 [2C]
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1232
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1232 [2C]
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1242
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1242 [2C]
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1248
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1248 [2C]
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1254
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1254 [2C]
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1260
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1260 [2C]
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1262
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1262 [2C]
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1268
WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1268 [2C]
Plumb 1981, Combustion IR in Solid
DoD-ELAPTotal Organic Carbon
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
95 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
Code Description Number Expires
UST-033Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation 05/06/2017ADEC
2748California Department of Public Health CAELAP 02/28/2018CALAP
66169DoD-Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program 03/30/2017DoD-ELAP
WA100006ORELAP - Oregon Laboratory Accreditation Program 05/11/2017NELAP
C558WA Dept of Ecology 06/30/2017WADOE
C558Ecology - Drinking Water 06/30/2017WA-DW
Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the
chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its
entirety.
96 of 97
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696
Nate Evenson
Navy
17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103
Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants
Analytical Resources, Incorporated
Notes and Definitions
Flagged value is not within established control limits.*
The reported value is from a dilutionD
Estimated concentration value detected below the reporting limit.J
The reported value is greater than 40% difference between the concentrations determined on two GC columns where applicable.P1
This analyte is not detected above the applicable reporting or detection limit.U
Raised reporting limit due to interferenceY1
Sample results reported on a dry weight basis
Relative Percent DifferenceRPD
dry
Not ReportedNR
Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limitND
Analyte DETECTEDDET
[2C] Indicates this result was quantified on the second column on a dual column analysis.
97 of 97
DATA QUALITY REPORT
PRE-CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT SAMPLING FOR SALTWATER DISTRIBUTION PIPING REPLACEMENT
PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD - NAVAL BASE KITSAP-BREMERTON
Kane Project # MOMS7451696
Prepared for: Kane Environmental
3815 Woodland Park Avenue, Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98103
Prepared by: EcoChem, Inc.
1011 Western Ave., Suite 1006 Seattle, Washington 98104
EcoChem Project Number: C25105-2
April 13, 2017
Approved for Release:
Christina Mott Frans Senior Project Chemist
PROJECT NARRATIVE
BASIS FOR DATA VALIDATION
This report documents the results of summary data validation (EPA Stage 2B) performed on sediment sample data collected in support of the Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Distribution Piping Replacement Project at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. This data set includes analytical results for sediment samples and the associated laboratory and field quality control analyses (method blanks, laboratory control samples, laboratory duplicates, and matrix spikes). A complete list of samples is provided in the SAMPLE INDEX.
Samples were analyzed by Analytical Resources, Incorporated, Tukwila, Washington. Data were validated by the following EcoChem, Inc. chemists.
TEST METHOD PRIMARY REVIEW CHEMISTS
SECONDARY REVIEWCHEMIST
Polychlorinated Biphenyl Compounds (PCBs) SW8082A E. Clayton C. Frans
Total Metals SW6010C SW7471B
The data were reviewed using guidance and quality control criteria documented in the analytical methods, the USEPA National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review (Aug 2014), and the USEPA National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Inorganic Data Review, (USEPA, Final January 2010).
Sample results and related QC data were received in both electronic and portable document format (pdf) format. The laboratory electronic data deliverables (EDD) were verified against the hard copy data packages prior to validation.
For each data package, a Summary level of review was performed. A summary level is equivalent to an USEPA CLP “QA Level III” level of effort. The validation level for each sample is provided in the database.
EcoChem’s goal in assigning data assessment qualifiers is to assist in proper data interpretation. If values are estimated (J or UJ), data may be used for site evaluation and risk assessment purposes but reasons for data qualification should be taken into consideration when interpreting sample concentrations. If values are assigned an R, the data are to be rejected and should not be used for any site evaluation purposes. If values have no data qualifier assigned, then the data meet the data quality objectives as stated in the documents and methods referenced above.
Data qualifier definitions, reason codes, and validation criteria are included as Appendix A. A Qualified Data Summary Table is included in Appendix B. Data Validation Worksheets will be kept on file at EcoChem, Inc. Qualified laboratory electronic data deliverables (EDD) have already been submitted prior to this report.
Sample IndexPre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Distribution Piping Replacement
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard - Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton
SDG Sample ID Laboratory ID PCBs MetalsDD3-E-022217 17B0342-01
DD3-M-022217 17B0342-02
DD3-W-022217 17B0342-03
DD1-E-022217 17B0342-05
DD1-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-06
DD1-W-022217 17B0342-07
DD1-M-022217 17B0342-08
DD2-E-022217 17B0342-09
DD2-M-022217 17B0342-10
DD2-W-022217 17B0342-11
DD4-W-022217 17B0342-12
DD4-E-022217 17B0342-13
DD4-M-022217 17B0342-14
DD5-E-022217 17B0342-15
DD5-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-16
DD5-M-022217 17B0342-17
DD5-W-022217 17B0342-18
17B0342
4/13/2017Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\sidx_qdst.xlsxPage 1 of 1 EcoChem, Inc.
cmf 4/13/2017 PCB Aroclors - 1 EcoChem, Inc. Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\25105-2 PCB_Aroclors Report.docx
DATA VALIDATION REPORT PSNS – Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling
PCB Aroclors by Method SW8082A
This report documents the review of analytical data from the analyses of sediment samples and the associated laboratory and field quality control (QC) samples. Samples were analyzed by ARI Laboratories, Tukwila, Washington. Refer to the Sample Index for a complete list of samples.
SDG Number of Samples
Validation Level
17B0342 18 Sediment Stage 2B
I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS
The laboratory submitted all required deliverables. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative.
II. EDD TO HARDCOPY VERIFICATION
Ten percent (10%) of the results in the laboratory EDD were verified by comparison to the laboratory data package. No errors were noted.
III. TECHNICAL DATA VALIDATION
The QC requirements that were reviewed are listed in the following table
Sample Receipt, Preservation, and Holding Times Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) Initial Calibration (ICAL) 1 Field Duplicates Continuing Calibration (CCAL) Target Analyte List Laboratory Blanks 1 Reporting Limits 1 Field Blanks 2 Compound Identification 1 Surrogate Compounds 1 Reported Results Matrix Spikes/Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD) Stated method quality objectives (MQO) and QC criteria have been met. No outliers are noted or discussed. 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.
Initial Calibration
Initial calibration (ICAL) standards were analyzed at the required frequency and the percent difference (%D) values were within the control limit of 20%.
cmf 4/13/2017 PCB Aroclors - 2 EcoChem, Inc. Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\25105-2 PCB_Aroclors Report.docx
Continuing Calibration
All continuing calibration (CCAL) percent difference (%D) values were within the 20% control limit.
Laboratory Blanks
Method blanks were analyzed at the required frequency of one per batch of 20 or fewer samples. No analytes were detected in the method blanks.
Field Blanks
No field blanks were included with this data set.
Surrogate Compound
The surrogate compounds decachlorobiphenyl and tetrachloro-m-xylene were added to all samples. All surrogate recovery values were within the laboratory control limits with the following exception.
The %D value for decachlorobiphenyl exceeded the acceptance criteria for the second source initial calibration verification analyzed on 3/02/17. The associated Aroclor compounds were unaffected. No qualification was required.
Matrix Spikes/Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD)
Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) samples were analyzed at the appropriate frequency of one pair per batch of 20 or fewer samples. All MS/MSD recovery values were within the laboratory control limits.
Laboratory Control Samples
Laboratory control samples (LCS) were analyzed at the required frequency of one per batch of 20 or fewer samples. All LCS recovery values were within the laboratory control limits.
Field Duplicates
Samples DD5-E-022217 and DD5-E-022217-DUP were identified as field duplicates. All acceptance criteria were met.
Target Analyte List
Results were reported for all compounds on the target analyte list.
Reporting Limits
Most samples had elevated detection limits for Aroclor 1248.
cmf 4/13/2017 PCB Aroclors - 3 EcoChem, Inc. Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\25105-2 PCB_Aroclors Report.docx
Compound Identification
As required by the method, the laboratory analyzed any samples with positive detections on a confirmatory column. The results from the two analytical columns were compared for agreement. An elevated RPD value may indicate the presence of an interference resulting in a high bias. When an RPD value was greater than 40% but less than 60% the reported value was estimated (J-3). If the RPD value was greater than 60%, the result was qualified as a tentative identification (NJ-3). With the following exceptions, the second column confirmation RPD values (%D) values were less than 40%.
SAMPLE ID ANALYTE RPD ACTION DD3-W-022217 Aroclor 1260 46.4 J-3 DD1-W-022217 Aroclor 1260 52.1 J-3 DD2-E-022217 Aroclor 1260 63.5 NJ-3 DD5-M-022217 Aroclor 1260 43.6 J-3 DD5-W-022217 Aroclor 1260 123 J-3
Reported Results
The chromatograms for several samples indicated non-target background interference for Aroclor 1248. The RL for these analytes were flagged “Y” by the laboratory. These “Y” flagged results were qualified (U-22) to indicate that the reported value represents a non-detect at an elevated RL. Aroclor 1248 was qualified for the following samples:
DD3-M-022217 DD1-M-022217 DD2-E-022217 DD4-W-022217 DD4-E-022217 DD4-M-022217 DD5-E-022217
DD5-E-022217-DUP
IV. OVERALL ASSESSMENT
As determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical method. Accuracy was acceptable as demonstrated by the surrogate, LCS, and MS/MSD percent recovery values. Precision was also acceptable as demonstrated by the MS/MSD and field duplicate relative percent difference values.
Detection limits were elevated based on matrix interference. Results were qualified due to secondary column confirmation RPD outliers.
All data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.
MPH 3/27/2013 MET - 1 EcoChem, Inc. Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\25105-2_Metals_Sediment.docx
DATA VALIDATION REPORT PSNS – Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling
Metals by EPA Methods SW6010C & SW7471A
This report documents the review of analytical data from the analyses of sediment samples and the associated laboratory and field quality control (QC) samples. Samples were analyzed by Analytical Resources, Inc., Seattle, Washington.
SDG NUMBER OF SAMPLES VALIDATION LEVEL 17B0342 16 Sediment EPA Stage 2B
I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS
The laboratory submitted all required deliverables. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative. The calibration information for the mercury analyses on 3/10/17 were missing from the laboratory report. The laboratory was contacted and submitted the missing calibration summary forms.
II. EDD TO HARDCOPY VERIFICATION
A representative (10%) verification of the electronic data deliverable (EDD) sample and QC results was performed by comparison to the pdf laboratory data package. No errors were noted.
III. TECHNICAL DATA VALIDATION
The QC requirements that were reviewed are listed below.
Sample Receipt, Preservation, & Holding Times 2 Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD) Initial Calibration 2 Laboratory Duplicates Continuing Calibration Verification 1 Field Duplicates ICP-MS Tune Interference Check Samples LLICV Standards Serial Dilutions 1 Laboratory Blanks 1 Reporting Limits (MDL and MRL) 1 Field Blanks Reported Results Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Stated method quality objectives (MQO) and QC criteria have been met. No outliers are noted or discussed. 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.
MPH 3/27/2013 MET - 2 EcoChem, Inc. Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\25105-2_Metals_Sediment.docx
Laboratory Blanks
Several instrument blanks had values greater than the method detection limit for cadmium, chromium, silver, and mercury. All associated sample results were greater than the 5X action level; therefore, no qualification was required.
Field Blanks
No field blanks were collected with this analytical data set.
Matrix Spikes
Matrix spike samples (MS) were analyzed at the proper frequency of one per 20 samples or one per batch. For accuracy, where analyte concentrations were less than 4x the spike amount, the percent recovery (%R) values were evaluated. If the percent recovery values indicate a potential low bias, associated results are estimated (J/UJ-8L). If the %R values indicate a potential high bias, only the associated positive results are estimated (J-8H). If one %R value indicates a potential low bias and the other %R value indicates a potential high bias, the data were estimated with no bias indication (J/UJ-8). In addition, no qualifiers were added for single outlier in the MS or MSD only.
Precision is indicated by the relative percent difference (RPD) between the MS and MSD values. RPD values outside the control limit of 20% indicate uncertainty in the measured results for the sample and positive results are estimated (J-9).
Although various elements exhibited recoveries outside the control limits, only the following required qualification in the associated samples:
PARENT SAMPLE ELEMENT MS %R
MSD %R RPD POTENTIAL
BIAS ACTION
DD3-E-02217 Mercury 132 227 33 High J-8H,9
Laboratory Duplicates
Laboratory duplicate (LD) samples were analyzed at the proper frequency of one per 20 samples or one per batch. Where analyte concentrations were less than 5x the reporting limit, the differences were calculated and evaluated. Where analyte concentrations were greater than 5x the reporting limit, the relative percent difference (RPD) values were calculated and evaluated with a control limit of 20%.
Laboratory duplicate RPD values greater than the control limit are listed below:
PARENT SAMPLE ELEMENT RPD ACTION
DD3-E-02217 Lead 24.3 J-9 Mercury 21.6 J-9
MPH 3/27/2013 MET - 3 EcoChem, Inc. Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\25105-2_Metals_Sediment.docx
Field Duplicates
Samples DD1-E-022217 and DD1-E-022217-DUP were identified as field duplicates. All acceptance criteria were met.
Reporting Limits
Several samples were analyzed at required dilutions that affected method detection and reporting limits.
IV. OVERALL ASSESSMENT
As was determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical methods. With the exceptions noted above, accuracy was acceptable as demonstrated by the laboratory control sample and matrix spike percent recovery values and precision was acceptable as demonstrated by the MS/MSD and laboratory and field duplicate RPD values.
Data were estimated based on matrix spike accuracy as well as matrix spike and laboratory duplicate precision outliers.
All data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.
W:\APPENDICES\APPENDIX A.docx
APPENDIX A
DATA QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS
REASON CODES
AND CRITERIA TABLES
4/16/09 PM EcoChem, Inc. T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\Qualifiers & Reason Codes\NFG Qual Defs.docx
DATA VALIDATION QUALIFIER CODES Based on National Functional Guidelines
The following definitions provide brief explanations of the qualifiers assigned to results in the data review process.
U The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit.
J The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
NJ The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte that has been “tentatively identified” and the associated numerical value represents the approximate concentration.
UJ The analyte was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. However, the reported quantitation limit is approximate and may or may not represent the actual limit of quantitation necessary to accurately and precisely measure the analyte in the sample.
R The sample results are rejected due to serious deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample and meet quality control criteria. The presence or absence of the analyte cannot be verified.
The following is an EcoChem qualifier that may also be assigned during the data review process:
DNR Do not report; a more appropriate result is reported from another analysis or dilution.
T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\Qualifiers & Reason Codes\Reason Codes-EcoChem rev2.docx EcoChem, Inc.
DATA QUALIFIER REASON CODES
Group Code Reason for Qualification
Sample Handling 1 Improper Sample Handling or Sample Preservation (i.e., headspace, cooler temperature, pH, summa canister pressure); Exceeded Holding Times
Instrument Performance
24 Instrument Performance (i.e., tune, resolution, retention time window, endrin breakdown, lock-mass)
5A Initial Calibration (RF, %RSD, r2)
5B Calibration Verification (CCV, CCAL; RF, %D, %R) Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate
5C Initial Calibration Verification (ICV %D, %R) Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate
Blank Contamination
6 Field Blank Contamination (Equipment Rinsate, Trip Blank, etc.)
7 Lab Blank Contamination (i.e., method blank, instrument blank, etc.) Use low bias flag (L)1 for negative instrument blanks
Precision and Accuracy
8 Matrix Spike (MS and/or MSD) Recoveries Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate
9 Precision (all replicates: LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, Lab Replicate, Field Replicate)
10 Laboratory Control Sample Recoveries (a.k.a. Blank Spikes) Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate
12 Reference Material Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate
13 Surrogate Spike Recoveries (a.k.a. labeled compounds, recovery standards) Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate
Interferences
16 ICP/ICP-MS Serial Dilution Percent Difference
17 ICP/ICP-MS Interference Check Standard Recovery Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate
19 Internal Standard Performance (i.e., area, retention time, recovery)
22 Elevated Detection Limit due to Interference (i.e., chemical and/or matrix)
23 Bias from Matrix Interference (i.e. diphenyl ether, PCB/pesticides)
Identification and Quantitation
2 Chromatographic pattern in sample does not match pattern of calibration standard
3 2nd column confirmation (RPD or %D)
4 Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) (associated with NJ only)
20 Calibration Range or Linear Range Exceeded
25 Compound Identification (i.e., ion ratio, retention time, relative abundance, etc.)
Miscellaneous
11 A more appropriate result is reported (multiple reported analyses i.e., dilutions, re-extractions, etc. Associated with “R” and “DNR” only)
14 Other (See DV report for details)
26 Method QC information not provided
1 H = high bias indicated
L = low bias indicated
Table No.: NFG-PCBRevision No.: 5
Last Rev. Date: 12/21/14Page: 1 of 3
QC Element Acceptance Criteria (NFG) Source of Criteria Action for Non-Conformance Reason
Code Discussion and Comments
Sample Cooler/Storage TemperaturePreservation
4°C ± 2°CTissue/sediments (may be frozen -20°C)
NFG (1)
Method (2)If required by project:
J (pos)/UJ (ND) if greater than 6° C 1Use Professional Judgment (PJ) to qualify
for temperature outlier.Current SW846 criterion is ≤ 6° C (3)
Holding Time
Extraction Aqueous: 7 days from collectionExtraction Solid: 14 days from collection
Exraction Tissue/Sediment (frozen): 1 yearAnalysis (all matrices): 40 days from extraction
NFG (1)
Method (2)
If required by project:J (pos)/UJ (ND) if ext/analyzed > HTJ (pos)/R (ND) if gross exceedance
(> 2x HT)
1
Use PJ to qualify for holding time outlier.Current SW846 does not have an extraction holding time limit. (3)
Gross exceedance > 2x HT, as per NFG 1999
Instrument Performance
RetentionTimes
Surrogates: TCMX (± 0.05); DCB (± 0.10)Aroclors (± 0.07) NFG (1) NJ (pos)/R (ND) results for analytes with
RT shifts 24
Initial Calibration
Minimum 5 point with RSD ≤ 20% ORcorrelation coefficient (r-value) ≥ 0.995 OR
Minimum 6-point with co-efficient of determination (r2-value) ≥ 0.99
NFG (1)
Method (4)
J (pos) if %RSD greater than 20% ORr-value < 0.995 OR
r2-value < 0.995A
Refer to TM-01 for additional information.
Use bias flags (H,L)(5) where appropriate
Initial CalibrationVerification (ICV)
No NFG criteria.Project specific. Project J (pos) if > UCL
J (pos)/UJ (ND) if < LCL 5B Use bias flags (H,L) where appropriate
Continuing Calibration
(Prior to each 12 hr. shift)
%D ± 20% Method (2) If > 20% (high bias): J (pos) If <20% (low bias: J (pos)/UJ (ND) 5B
Refer to TM-01 for additional information.
Use bias flags (H,L) where appropriate
Blank Contamination
Method Blank (MB)
MB: One per matrix per batch of (of ≤ 20 samples)
No detected compounds > RL
NFG (1)
Method (2)
U (pos)if result is less than appropriate 5X action
level.7
Field Blank (FB) FB: frequency as per QAPPNo detected compounds > RL
NFG (1)
Method (2)
U (pos)if result is less than appropriate 5X action
level.6
InstrumentBlanks (IB)
Analyzed at the beginning and end of every 12 hour sequence
No analyte > CRQLNFG (1)
U (pos)if result is less than appropriate 5X action
level.7
PCB Aroclors by GC(Based on Organic NFG 2008 and SW-846 Method 8082A)
Hierarchy of blank review:#1 - Review MB and IB, qualify as
needed#2 - Review FB , qualify as needed
Note: Actions as per NFG 1999
Note: IB not required by method
Y:\EC Organize\EcoChem QA Program\SOPs_QMP_CT_WIN_TM Source Docs\Criteria Tables\ EcoChem NFG PCB_Rev5.xlsx Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.
Table No.: NFG-PCBRevision No.: 5
Last Rev. Date: 12/21/14Page: 2 of 3
QC Element Acceptance Criteria (NFG) Source of Criteria Action for Non-Conformance Reason
Code Discussion and Comments
PCB Aroclors by GC(Based on Organic NFG 2008 and SW-846 Method 8082A)
Precision and Accuracy
MS/MSD(recovery)
One set per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples)AR1016 and AR1260: %R = 29% - 135%, or
project limits
NFG (1)
Method (2)
Qualify parent only unless other QC indicates
systematic problems.J (pos) if both %R > upper control limit
(UCL) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if both %R < lower control
limit (LCL)J (pos)/R (ND) if both %R < 10%
8
No action if only one spike %R is outside criteria.
No action if native analyte conc. > 5x the amount spiked.
Use bias flags (H,L) where appropriate.Actions apply to all Aroclors in parent
sample.
MS/MSD(RPD)
One set per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples)AR1016: RPD < 15%, AR1260: RPD < 20%
or project limits
NFG (1)
Method (2)
Qualify parent only unless other QC indicates
systematic problems.J (pos) if RPD > control limit
9 No action if parent is ND.
LCSOne per lab batch (of ≤ 20 samples)
AR1016 and AR1260: %R = 50% - 150%, or project limits
NFG (1)J (pos) if %R > UCL J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R
< LCLJ (pos)/R (ND) if %R < 10%
10Use bias flags (H,L) where appropriate.
Actions apply to all Aroclors in associated samples.
LCS/LCSD (RPD) if analyzed use MS/MSD RPD criteria NFG (1) J (pos) assoc. compound in all samples 9 LCSD not required by method or NFG
Precision and Accuracy
SurrogatesTCMX and DCBP added to every sample
%R = 30% - 150%or project limits
NFG (1)
Method (2)
J (pos) if either %R > UCL J (pos)/UJ (ND) if either %R < LCLJ (pos)/R (ND) if either %R < 10%
13If %R < 10% (sample dilution is a factor),
use PJ Use bias flags (H,L) where appropriate
Internal Standards(if used)
Acceptable Range: IS area = 50% to 200% of CCAL area
RT within 30 seconds of CC RTMethod (2)
J (pos) if area > 200%J (pos)/UJ (ND) if area < 50%J (pos)/R (ND) if area < 25%
RT > 30 seconds, narrate
19
Field Duplicates
Solids: RPD < 50%OR difference < 2X RL (for results < 5X RL)
Aqueous: RPD < 35%OR difference < 1X RL (for results < 5X RL)
EcoChemJ (pos)/UJ (ND)
Qualify only parent and field duplicate samples
9 use project limits if specified
Y:\EC Organize\EcoChem QA Program\SOPs_QMP_CT_WIN_TM Source Docs\Criteria Tables\ EcoChem NFG PCB_Rev5.xlsx Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.
Table No.: NFG-PCBRevision No.: 5
Last Rev. Date: 12/21/14Page: 3 of 3
QC Element Acceptance Criteria (NFG) Source of Criteria Action for Non-Conformance Reason
Code Discussion and Comments
PCB Aroclors by GC(Based on Organic NFG 2008 and SW-846 Method 8082A)
Compound Identification/Quantification
Quantitation/Identification
Between two columns: RPD < 40% or %D < 25% Within Retention Time Windows on both
columns.
NFG (1)
Method (2)
J (pos) if RPD = 40% - 60% (25% - 60% for %D)
NJ (pos) if > 60%R (pos) if RTW criterion not met
3 See TM-08 for additional info.
Calibration Range on column concentration < high calibration standard
NFG (1)
Method (2)J (pos) if conc > high standard and
sample was not diluted 20
Dilutions, Re-extractions
and/or Reanalyses
Report only one result peranalyte
Standard reporting policy
Use "DNR" to flag results that will not be reported. 11 TM-04 Rev. 1 for additional info.
Sample Clean-up
GPC/Sulfur/Florisil/Acid
No criteria - cleanups are optional
NFG (1)
Method (2) Use Professional Judgment 14
special cleanups may be required for project
cleanup standards may be associated with GPC/florisil cleanups
1 National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review, June, 20082 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography USEPA Method SW846 8082A, Feb 2007, Rev. 13 SW846, Chapter 4, Organic Analytes4 Determinative Chromatographic Separations , Method 8000C , March 2003, Rev.35 "H" = high bias indicated; "L" = low bias indicated
Y:\EC Organize\EcoChem QA Program\SOPs_QMP_CT_WIN_TM Source Docs\Criteria Tables\ EcoChem NFG PCB_Rev5.xlsx Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.
DATA VALIDATION CRITERIA Table: NFG ICP-AES Revision: 1
Last Rev. Date: 1/9/2015Page: 1 of 4
QC Element EcoChem Acceptance CriteriaSource of Criteria
EcoChem Action for Non-ConformanceReason Code
Discussion and Comments
Sample Handling
Cooler / Storage TemperaturePreservation
Solid: Cooler temperature 4°C±2°CAqueous: Nitric Acid to pH < 2
Dissolved Metals: 0.45 µm filter,preserve to pH < 2 after filtration
NFG (1)
Method (2)
Cooler Temps: If required by projectJ (pos)/UJ (ND) if greater than 6° CAqueous: J (pos)/UJ (ND) if pH > 2
1
Use PJ to qualify for temperature outlier.Current SW846 criterion is ≤ 6° C (4)
No quals for pH if samples preserved by lab upon receipt and within 1 day of collection.
Holding TimeAll matrices: 180 days from date sampled
Frozen soils, sediments, tissues (-20°C) - HT extended to 1 year
NFG (1)
Method (2)
EcoChem standard policy
J (pos)/UJ (ND) if holding time exceeded 1
Instrument Performance
Initial Calibration (ICAL)
Based on instrument requirements, blank + 1 standard minimum requirement for calibration
If more than 1 standard used, r ≥ 0.995
NFG (1)
Method (2) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if r < 0.995 5A
Initial CalibrationVerification (ICV)
Independent source analyzed immediately after calibration
%R within ± 10% of true value
NFG (1)
Method (2)
R (pos/ND) if %R < 75%J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R 75% - 89%
J (pos) if %R >111% 5A (H,L)3 Qualify all samples in run
Reporting Limit (RL) Standard
Low Level ICV/CCV
concentration at RL %R = 70%-130%
Method (2)J (pos) < 2x RL / R (ND) if %R <50%
J (pos) < 2x RL / UJ (ND) if %R 50 - 69% J (pos) < 2x RL if %R > 130%
5A (H,L)3 Qualify all samples in run
Continuing CalibrationVerification (CCV)
Immediately following ICV/ICB,then every two hours or ten samples, and at end
of run.%R within ± 10% of true value
NFG (1)
Method (2)
R (pos/ND) if %R < 75%J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R 75% - 89%
J (pos) if %R >111% 5B (H,L)3 Qualify samples bracketed by CCV outliers
Interference Check Samples
(ICSA / ICSAB)
ICSAB %R 80% - 120% for all spiked elements| ICSA | < MDL for all unspiked elements
NFG (1)
Method (2)
For samples with Al, Ca, Fe, Mg > ICS levels:ICSAB: J( pos)/R (ND) if %R < 50%J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R = 50% - 79%
J (pos) if %R > 120% ICSA: J (pos)< 2x ICSA/UJ (ND) for ICSA <Neg
MDLJ (pos) < 2x ICSA for ICSA > MDL
17 (H,L)3Use PJ and inter-element correction factors toevaluate ICSA to determine if bias is present.Refer to TM-09 for additional information.
Metals by ICP-AES(Based on Inorganic NFG 2010 and SW-846 6010C)
T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\EcoChem Default Criteria Tables\EcoChem NFG ICP-AES_Rev 1.xlsxICP Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.
DATA VALIDATION CRITERIA Table: NFG ICP-AES Revision: 1
Last Rev. Date: 1/9/2015Page: 2 of 4
QC Element EcoChem Acceptance CriteriaSource of Criteria
EcoChem Action for Non-ConformanceReason Code
Discussion and Comments
Metals by ICP-AES(Based on Inorganic NFG 2010 and SW-846 6010C)
Blank Contamination
Method Blank (MB)One per matrix per batch of (of ≤ 20 samples)
Blank conc < MDLNFG (1)
Method (2)
U (pos) if result is < 5X method blank concentration
7Refer to TM-02 for additional information.
Blank Evaluation based on NFG 1994
Instrument Blanks(ICB/CCB)
After each ICV & CCV| blank concentration | < MDL
NFG (1)
Method (2)
Action level is 5x absolutevalue of blank conc.For positive blanks:
U (pos) results < action levelFor negative blanks:
J (pos)/UJ (ND) results < action level
Pos Blanks: 7
Neg Blanks:
7L3
Use blanks bracketing samples for QualificationRefer to TM-02 for additional information.
Hierarchy of blank review:#1 - Review MB, quaify as needed#2 - Review IB , qualify as needed#3 - Review FB , qualify as needed
Field Blank (FB) Blank conc < MDLEcoChem
standard policyU (pos) if result is < 5x action level,
as per analyte.6
Qualify in associated field samples only.Refer to TM-02 for additional information.
Precision and Accuracy
LCS(recovery)
One per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples); LCSD not required
%R between 80-120%Method (2)
J (pos)/R (ND) if %R <50% J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R 50% - 79%
J (pos) if %R > 120% 10 (H,L)3
Qualify all samples in batchQAPP may have overriding accuracy limits.
NFG Limits 70% -130% (50% - 150% Ab, Ag)
LCS/LCSD(RPD)
LCSD not required, if analyzed:RPD ≤ 20%
Method (2) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if RPD > 20% 9Qualify all samples in batch
QAPP may have overriding precision limits.
MS/MSD(recovery)
One per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples); MSD not required
%R between 75-125%
NFG (1)
Method (2)
J (pos) if %R > 125%J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R <75%J (pos)/R (ND) if %R < 30%,
unless post digestion spike analyzed,J (pos)/UJ (ND) if post digestion spike %R OK
8 (H,L)3
No action if only one spike %R is outside criteria.
NA if parent concentration >4x the amount spiked.
Qualify all samples in batch.QAPP may have overriding accuracy limits.
T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\EcoChem Default Criteria Tables\EcoChem NFG ICP-AES_Rev 1.xlsxICP Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.
DATA VALIDATION CRITERIA Table: NFG ICP-AES Revision: 1
Last Rev. Date: 1/9/2015Page: 3 of 4
QC Element EcoChem Acceptance CriteriaSource of Criteria
EcoChem Action for Non-ConformanceReason Code
Discussion and Comments
Metals by ICP-AES(Based on Inorganic NFG 2010 and SW-846 6010C)
Precision and Accuracy con't
Post Digestion SpikesIf MS is outside 75-125%, post-spike should be
analyzed%R 80%-120% (method); 75%-125% (NFG)
NFG (1)
Method (2)
Only used to support MS qualification decisions
NANo qualifiers assigned based solely on this
element.
MS/MSD(RPD)
MSD not required, if analyzed:RPD ≤ 20%
NFG (1)
Method (2) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if RPD > 20% 9 QAPP may have overriding precision limits.
Laboratory Duplicate
One per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples)RPD ≤ 20% for results ≥ 5x RL
Solids: difference < 2X RL for results < 5X RLAqueous: difference < 1X RL for results < 5X RL
NFG (1)
Method (2)
J (pos)/UJ (ND) if RPD > 20% orif difference > control limit
9 Qualify all samples in batch.
QAPP may have overriding precision limits.
Reference Material(RM, SRM, or CRM)
Result ±20% of the 95% confidenceinterval of the true value for analytes
EcoChem standard policy
J (pos)/UJ (ND) if < LCL J (pos) if > UCL
12 (H,L)3QAPP may have overriding accuracy limits.
Some manufacturers may have different RM control limits
Serial DilutionAnalyze one sample per matrix at a 5x dilution%D <10% for original sample conc. > 50x MDL
NFG (1)
Method (2)
J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %D > 10% and native sample concentration > 50x MDL
16 Qualify all samples in batch.
Field Duplicate
Solids: RPD <50% (for results ≥ 5x RL)OR difference < 2X RL (for results < 5X RL)
Aqueous: RPD <35% (for results ≥ 5x RL)OR difference < 1X RL (for results < 5X RL)
EcoChem standard policy
Qualify only parent and field duplicate samples
J (pos)/UJ (ND)9
QAPP may have overriding precision limits.Client/QAPP may not require qualification
based on field precision.
T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\EcoChem Default Criteria Tables\EcoChem NFG ICP-AES_Rev 1.xlsxICP Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.
DATA VALIDATION CRITERIA Table: NFG ICP-AES Revision: 1
Last Rev. Date: 1/9/2015Page: 4 of 4
QC Element EcoChem Acceptance CriteriaSource of Criteria
EcoChem Action for Non-ConformanceReason Code
Discussion and Comments
Metals by ICP-AES(Based on Inorganic NFG 2010 and SW-846 6010C)
Compound Quantitation
Total and Dissolved Comparison
Total > DissolvedEcoChem
standard policy
J (pos)/UJ (ND) if Dissolved > Total andresults fall outside of standard duplicate
precision criteria14
Calibration Range Results < instrument linear rangeNFG (1)
Method (2)
J (pos) if result exceeds linear range and sample was not diluted
20
Dilutions, Re-extractions
and/or Reanalyses
Report only oneresult per analyte
EcoChem standard policy
Use "DNR" to flag results that will not be reported.
11TM-04 EcoChem Policy for Rejection/Selection
Process for Multiple Results
1 National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review, January 2010. (pos): Positive Result2 Method SW846 6010C Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES), Revision 3, February 2007. (ND): Not Detected3 "H" = high bias indicated; "L" = low bias indicated4 SW846, Chapter 3, Inorganic Analytes
T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\EcoChem Default Criteria Tables\EcoChem NFG ICP-AES_Rev 1.xlsxICP Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.
DATA VALIDATION CRITERIA Table No.: NFG-HgRevision No.: 1
Last Rev. Date: 01/08/2015Page: 1 of 3
QC Element Acceptance Criteria Source of Criteria Action for Non-ConformanceReason Code
Discussion and Comments
Sample Handling
Cooler / Storage TemperaturePreservation
Solid: Cooler temperature 4°C±2°CAqueous: Nitric Acid to pH < 2
Dissolved Metals: 0.45 µm filter,preserve to pH < 2 after filtration
NFG (1)
Method (2)
Cooler Temps: If required by projectJ (pos)/UJ (ND) if greater than 6° CAqueous: J (pos)/UJ (ND) if pH > 2
1
Use PJ to qualify for temperature outlier.Current SW846 criterion is ≤ 6° C (4)
No quals for pH if samples preserved by lab immediately upon receipt and within
1 day of collection.
Holding Time28 days from date sampled
Frozen solids and tissues HT extended to 6 months
NFG (1)
Method (2)
EcoChem standard policy
J (pos)/UJ (ND) if HT exceeded 1
Instrument Performance
Initial Calibration (ICAL)
Daily CalibrationBlank + 5 standards, one ≤ RL
Correlation coefficient (r) ≥ 0.995
NFG (1)
Method (2) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if r < 0.995 5A (H,L)3
Initial CalibrationVerification (ICV)
Independent source analyzedimmediately after ICAL
%R within ± 15% of true value
NFG (1)
Method (2)
R(pos/ND) if %R <70% J(pos)/UJ(ND) if %R = 70-84%
J(pos) if %R = > 116% 5A (H,L)3 Qualify all samples in run
Reporting Limit (RL) Standard
Conc = RL%R = 70-130%
Method (2)J (pos) < 2x RL / R (ND) if %R <50%
J (pos) < 2x RL / UJ (ND) if %R 50 - 69% J (pos) < 2x RL if %R > 130%
5A (H,L)3 Qualify all samples in run
Continuing Calibration
Verification (CCV)
At beginning of run, every ten samples,and again after last sample.
%R within ± 15% of true value
NFG (1)
Method (2)
R(pos/ND) if %R <70% J(pos)/UJ(ND) if %R = 70-84%
J(pos) if %R = > 116% 5B (H,L)3 Qualify samples bracketed by CCV
outliers
Blank Contamination
Method Blank (MB)One per matrix per batch of (of ≤ 20 samples)
Blank conc < MDLNFG (1)
Method (2) U (pos) if result is < 5X method blank concentration 7Refer to TM-02 for additional
information.Blank Evaluation based on NFG 1994
Mercury by CVAA(Based on Inorganic NFG 2010 and SW846 7470A & 7471B)
T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\EcoChem Default Criteria Tables\EcoChem NFG Hg_CVAA_Rev1.xlsxHg CVAA Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.
DATA VALIDATION CRITERIA Table No.: NFG-HgRevision No.: 1
Last Rev. Date: 01/08/2015Page: 2 of 3
QC Element Acceptance Criteria Source of Criteria Action for Non-ConformanceReason Code
Discussion and Comments
Mercury by CVAA(Based on Inorganic NFG 2010 and SW846 7470A & 7471B)
Instrument Blanks(ICB/CCB)
After each ICV & CCV| blank concentration | < MDL
NFG (1)
Method (2)
Action level is 5x absolutevalue of blank conc.For positive blanks:
U (pos) results < action levelFor negative blanks:
J (pos)/UJ (ND) results < action level
Pos Blanks:
7Neg
Blanks:
7L3
Use blanks bracketing samples for Qualification
Refer to TM-02 for additional information.
Hierarchy of blank review:#1 - Review MB, quaify as needed#2 - Review IB , qualify as needed#3 - Review FB , qualify as needed
Field Blank (FB) Blank conc < MDL EcoChem standard policyU (pos) if result is < 5x action level,
as per analyte.6
Qualify in associated field samples only.Refer to TM-02 for additional
information.Precision and Accuracy
Laboratroy Control Sample
(recovery)
One per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples); LCSD not required
%R between 80-120%Method (2)
J (pos)/R (ND) if %R <50% J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R 50% - 79%
J (pos) if %R > 120% 10 (H,L)3
Qualify all samples in batchQAPP may have overriding accuracy
limits.NFG does not address LCS
LCS/LCSD(RPD)
LCSD not required, if analyzed:RPD ≤ 20%
Method (2) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if RPD > 20% 9Qualify all samples in batch
QAPP may have overriding precision limits.
Matris Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate
MS/MSD(recovery)
One per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples); MSD not required
%R between 75-125%
NFG (1)
Method (2)
J (pos) if %R > 125%J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R <75%J (pos)/R (ND) if %R < 30%
8 (H,L)3
No action if only one spike %R is outside criteria.
NA if parent concentration >4x the amount spiked.
Qualify all samples in batch.QAPP may have overriding accuracy
limits.
MS/MSD(RPD)
MSD not required, if analyzed:RPD ≤ 20%
NFG (1)
Method (2) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if RPD > 20% 9QAPP may have overriding precision
limits.
Laboratory Duplicate
One per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples)RPD ≤ 20% for results ≥ 5x RL
Solids: difference < 2X RL for results < 5X RLAqueous: difference < 1X RL for results < 5X RL
NFG (1)
Method (2)
J (pos)/UJ (ND) if RPD > 20% or if difference > control limit
9 Qualify all samples in batch.
QAPP may have overriding precision limits.
T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\EcoChem Default Criteria Tables\EcoChem NFG Hg_CVAA_Rev1.xlsxHg CVAA Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.
DATA VALIDATION CRITERIA Table No.: NFG-HgRevision No.: 1
Last Rev. Date: 01/08/2015Page: 3 of 3
QC Element Acceptance Criteria Source of Criteria Action for Non-ConformanceReason Code
Discussion and Comments
Mercury by CVAA(Based on Inorganic NFG 2010 and SW846 7470A & 7471B)
Reference Material(RM, SRM, or CRM)
Result ±20% of the 95% confidenceinterval of the true value for analytes
EcoChem standard policyJ (pos)/UJ (ND) if < LCL
J (pos) if > UCL12 (H,L)3
QAPP may have overriding accuracy limits.
Some manufacturers may have different RM control limits
Field Duplicate
Solids: RPD <50% (for results ≥ 5x RL)OR difference < 2X RL (for results < 5X RL)
Aqueous: RPD <35% (for results ≥ 5x RL)OR difference < 1X RL (for results < 5X RL)
EcoChem standard policyQualify only parent and field duplicate samples
J (pos)/UJ (ND)9
QAPP may have overriding precision limits.
Client/QAPP may not require qualification based on field precision.
Compound Quantitation
Total and Dissolved Comparison
Total > Dissolved EcoChem standard policyJ (pos)/UJ (ND) if Dissolved > Total and
results fall outside of standard duplicate precision criteria
14
Calibration Range Results < instrument linear rangeNFG (1)
Method (2)
if result exceeds linear range and sample was not diluted J (pos)
20
Dilutions, Re-extractions
and/or Reanalyses
Report only oneresult per analyte
EcoChem standard policy Use "DNR" to flag results that will not be reported. 11TM-04 EcoChem Policy for
Rejection/Selection Process for Multiple Results
1 National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review, January 2010. (pos): Positive Result2 Method SW846 7470A Mercury in Liquid Waste (Manual Cold-Vapor Technique), Revision 1, September 1994. (ND): Not Detected
Method SW846 7471B Mercury in Solid or Semisolid Waste (Manual Cold-Vapor Technique), Revision 2, February 2007.3 "H" = high bias indicated; "L" = low bias indicated4 SW846, Chapter 3, Inorganic Analytes
T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\EcoChem Default Criteria Tables\EcoChem NFG Hg_CVAA_Rev1.xlsxHg CVAA Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.
Qualified Data Summary Table Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Distrubution Piping Replacement
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard - Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton
SDG Sample_ID Laboratory ID Method Analyte Result Units Lab FlagValidation Qualifier
Validation Reason Code
DD3-W-022217 17B0342-03 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 [2C] 332 ug/kg dry P1 J 3DD1-W-022217 17B0342-07 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 [2C] 104 ug/kg dry P1 J 3DD2-E-022217 17B0342-09 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 [2C] 181 ug/kg dry P1 NJ 3DD5-M-022217 17B0342-17 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 [2C] 54.0 ug/kg dry P1 J 3DD5-W-022217 17B0342-18 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 [2C] 80.0 ug/kg dry P1 J 3DD3-M-022217 17B0342-02 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 29.0 ug/kg dry Y1 U 22DD1-M-022217 17B0342-08 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 27.7 ug/kg dry Y1 U 22DD2-E-022217 17B0342-09 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 39.9 ug/kg dry Y1, U U 22DD4-W-022217 17B0342-12 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 37.8 ug/kg dry Y1 U 22DD4-E-022217 17B0342-13 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 29.4 ug/kg dry Y1 U 22DD4-M-022217 17B0342-14 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 39.2 ug/kg dry Y1, U U 22DD5-E-022217 17B0342-15 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 28.8 ug/kg dry Y1 U 22DD5-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-16 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 29.0 ug/kg dry Y1 U 22DD1-E-022217 17B0342-05RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 66.2 mg/kg dry D J 9DD1-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-06RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 76.3 mg/kg dry J 9DD1-M-022217 17B0342-08RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 103 mg/kg dry J 9DD1-W-022217 17B0342-07RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 152 mg/kg dry J 9DD2-E-022217 17B0342-09RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 219 mg/kg dry D J 9DD2-M-022217 17B0342-10RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 79.7 mg/kg dry J 9DD2-W-022217 17B0342-11RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 70.4 mg/kg dry J 9DD3-E-02217 17B0342-01RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 28.4 mg/kg dry D J 9DD3-M-022217 17B0342-02RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 136 mg/kg dry J 9DD3-W-022217 17B0342-03RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 546 mg/kg dry D J 9DD4-E-022217 17B0342-13RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 54.3 mg/kg dry D J 9DD4-M-022217 17B0342-14RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 90.0 mg/kg dry J 9DD4-W-022217 17B0342-12RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 105 mg/kg dry J 9DD5-E-022217 17B0342-15RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 73.6 mg/kg dry J 9DD5-M-022217 17B0342-17RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 101 mg/kg dry J 9DD5-W-022217 17B0342-18RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 75.6 mg/kg dry J 9DD1-E-022217 17B0342-05RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.8374 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD1-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-06RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.9885 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD1-M-022217 17B0342-08RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 1.237 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD1-W-022217 17B0342-07RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 1.395 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD2-E-022217 17B0342-09RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 1.392 mg/kg dry J 8H,9
17B0342
4/13/2017Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\sidx_qdst.xlsx Page 1 of 2 EcoChem, Inc.
Qualified Data Summary Table Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Distrubution Piping Replacement
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard - Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton
SDG Sample_ID Laboratory ID Method Analyte Result Units Lab FlagValidation Qualifier
Validation Reason Code
DD2-M-022217 17B0342-10RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.8605 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD2-W-022217 17B0342-11RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.8313 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD3-E-02217 17B0342-01RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.3191 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD3-M-022217 17B0342-02RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.4909 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD3-W-022217 17B0342-03RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 1.822 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD4-E-022217 17B0342-13RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.8149 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD4-M-022217 17B0342-14RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.8845 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD4-W-022217 17B0342-12RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 1.450 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD5-E-022217 17B0342-15RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.7495 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD5-M-022217 17B0342-17RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.8146 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD5-W-022217 17B0342-18RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.7062 mg/kg dry J 8H,9
17B0342
4/13/2017Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\sidx_qdst.xlsx Page 2 of 2 EcoChem, Inc.