PRELIMINARY DRAFT not for circulation

Amathole District MunicipalityNGQUSHWA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY

March 2014

PRELIMINARY DRAFTnot for circulation

feasibility and review of housing plan for QAGA 500QAGA 500

Feasibility and Review of Housing Plan

QAGA 500QAGA 500

March 2014

by

prepared for

CNdV africa (Pty) Ltdenvironmental planning, urban design, landscape architecture

17 New Church Street Cape Town 8000Tel: 021 424-5022 Fax: 021 424-6837

Kantey & TemplerPO Box 15087Beacon Bay, 5205Tel: 041 373-0738

IQ Vision110 Sarel Cillier Street Strand 7140Tel: 021 853-3902

EASTERN CAPE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS 31-33 Phillip Frame Road ChiselhurstTel: +27 (0) 43 711 9735

NGQUSHWA LOCAL MUNICIPALITYPO Box 539, Peddie, 5640

Tel: (040) 673-3095Fax: (040) 673-3771

QAGA 500 FEASIBILITY STUDYCNdV africa (Pty) Ltd 20 April 2023

page 5

CONTENTS

2.1 INTRODUCTION

2.1.2 Purpose of the Report

2.1.2 Background of this Report

2.1.3 Terms of Reference

2.1.4 Background to Settlement

2.2 Status of Housing Project and Waiting List

2.3 Land Identification and Ownership

2.4 Engineering

2.5 Environment

2.6 Geo-tech

2.7 Distribution of Social Facilities

2.8 Current Spatial Development Framework

2.9 Approval by Council

2.10 Summary and Recommendations

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1 .1 Locality Plan

Figure 2.1.2 Aerial Photograph

Figure 2.1.3 Visual Survey

Figure 2.2.1 Statistical Background

Figure 2.3.1 Cadastral Layout

Figure 2.4.1 Engineering

Figure 2.5 .1 Environment

Figure 2.6.1 Geo-tech

Figure 2.7.1 Distribution of Social Facilities

Figure 2.8.1 Current Spatial Development Framework

LIST OF ANNEXURESAnnexure 1: OwnershipAnnexure 2: Title DeedAnnexure 3: S.G. Diagram


page 6

CONTENTS

GLOSSARY

Informal Site: A Site occupied by a household or to which a household has customary rights, e.g. Permission to occupy (PTO, no longer formally in use) or community agreement via a meeting of elders including headman or chief.

Formal Site: A site occupied by a household or to which a household is entitled to have a registered right recorded at the Deeds Registry with a title deed and surveyors diagram and/or registered General Plan. However, in many instances title deeds have not been issued or ownership registered.

In-Situ upgrade project: Formalising of tenure and installation of services and possibly also construction of a subsidised dwelling on land on which people are already living. Generally refers to a project larger than one unit.

Greenfields project: New project site which there has been no formal or informal settlement, industry, infrastructure to date. Project sites are often outside of existing urban development.

Infill Project: New project site within existing urban development usually on under utilised or vacant land and which often can help to promote physical integration between spatially isolated parts of the settlement.

Rectification projects: Repair or rebuilding of defective existing houses built through one or other government housing program.

Erven: The plural of ‘erf’ meaning plots of land each registered as an ‘erf’ in a deeds registry and forming part of a registered General Plan.

Plots: The plural of ‘plot’ meaning unregistered pieces of land informally laid out.

Portion: A plot of land forming part of a proposed or approved by Council subdivision layout but which has not yet been registered by the Surveyor General as a general plan and for which erf numbers have not yet been registered.

ACRONYMS

ECDHS Eastern Cape Department of Human SettlementEIA Environmental Impact AssessmentGP General PlanHSP Human Settlement PlanLM Local Municipality MHSP Municipal Human Settlement PlanSA South AfricaSANBI South African National Biodiversity InstituteSDF Spatial Development Framework


page 8

INTRODUCTION 2.1

2.1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT

The purpose of this report is to describe the key elements to be taken into account when assessing the feasibility of QAGA 500 as a Human Settlement Project and to recommend whether it should be approved or not.

2.1.2 BACKGROUND TO THIS REPORT

This report is one of ten Human Settlement Project feasibility reports for Nxuba Municipality. It is designed so that it can be part of a single document that includes the other five projects.

2.1.3 TERMS OF REFERENCE (Part C.3 Scope of work Tender No. SCMU11-12/13-A0240)

The project terms of reference for the feasibility report are summarised as follows:

Ascertain the feasibility of the project within each MHSP. The study shall reveal the developmental opportunities and constraints in relation to:

1. Determination of housing demand and potential beneficiary status

2. Land identification and ownership3. Availability of bulk services and confirmation of capacity4. Environmental conditions;5. Geo-technical conditions6. Alignment with Municipal Spatial Planning7. Visual survey (area visits)8. Future development plans of other sector departments 9. Provision of recommendation and proposals to ECDHS

2.1.4 BACKGROUND TO SETTLEMENT

•Registered Owner: Department of Rural Development and Land Reform

•Property Description: Ptn …

•Title Deed Restrictions: None (See Annexure 2)

•Servitudes: None (See Annexure 3)

•Current Zoning: Unknown

•Site Size: …Ha

•Qaga 500 is located within Ngqushwa Municipality.

•Qaga is a village located on the northern boundary of the municipality approximately 40km from Peddie and approximately 13km from King William’s Town on the N2 road, see Fig, 2.1.1 and 2.1.2.

•The village consists of low density residential plots approximately 2000 – 2500 m² former betterment schemes, see Fig. 2.1.2.

•Housing types are mainly mud and formal brick houses.


page 9

Locality Plan Figure 2.1.1


page 10

Aerial Photograph Figure 2.1.2


page 11

VISUAL SURVEY Figure 2.1.3


page 12


page 13

STATUS OF HOUSING PROJECTS AND WAITING LISTS 2.2

•500 subsidies have been proposed for . These units will be In-Situ upgrade into existing plots.

•Housing waiting lists have been requested from the municipality and are still awaited for this project.

QAGA 600

Population (Ngqushwa SDF 2011) Not Specified

Population (2011 Census) Not Specified

No. Households (4/hh) Not Specified

Proposed Subsidies (EC DHS) 500

Waiting List (Ngqushwa LM) Awaited

Figure 2.2.1 Statistical Background


page 14

LAND IDENTIFICATION AND OWNERSHIP 2.3


page 15

Cadastral Layout Figure 2.3.1


page 16

ENGINEERING 2.4

BULK SERVICES Existing Services

....

INTERNAL SERVICES Existing Services

....

GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS....

EXISTING INTERNAL SERVICES ARE ADEQUATE AND REQUIRE NO UPGRADING

Await K&T

TOP STRUCTURE....

TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT...

ROADS AND ACCESSIBILITY...

THE PROJECT IS FEASIBLE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS.


page 17

Engineering Figure 2.4.1


page 18

• Qaga is a rural village located on relatively flat land containing gentle slopes.

• There are no wetlands or critical biodiversity areas noted on the relevant SANBI mapping for the area.

• The eastern portion of the site consists of land suited for subsistence farming.

• The Kwaboba River flows south of the settlement however does not threaten the proposed Human Settlement Project.

• Housing development needs to ensure that it remains 32m from the River or watercourse so as to avoid triggering NEMA EIA Regulations, namely Listing No. 40 as identified in the Government Notice R. 344 (Listing Notice 1). In which, a basic assessment will be required for:

– The expansion of(i) jetties by more than 50 square metres;

(ii) slipways by more than 50 square metres;

(iii) buildings by more than 50 square metres; or

(iv) infrastructure by more than 50 square metres within a watercourse or within 32 metres of a watercourse, measured from the edge of a watercourse, but excluding where such expansion will occur behind the development setback line.

• There are sections of Qaga that are rocky and would require a project specific geotech to be done prior development taking place.

ENVIRONMENT 2.5


page 19

Environment Figure 2.5.1


page 20

GEO-TECH 2.6

• In terms of the geotechnical information available the following is extracted from a report by Outeniqua Geotechnical Services cc, 2013 .

• Some potential geotechnical constraints have been identified for further investigation which may have an impact on the extent of the developable land and/or the development costs.

• The recommended typical foundations for subsidy housing are conventional strip foundations or light rafts to cater for variations in soil profile and minor soil movements.

• On sloping terrain, some earthworks and retaining walls may be required to create level platforms for houses and this can have significant cost implications.

• Foundations should be placed on well compacted natural soil, engineered fill or rock. Founding conditions will have to be inspected by the engineer to confirm suitable soil conditions with adequate bearing capacity and to check for any seepage or groundwater problems.

• Preliminary and Phase 1 geotechnical site investigations are required to obtain a more accurate evaluation of the development potential of each site, but the initial indications are that the geology is unlikely to pose a significant threat to the further development of these areas.


page 21

Geo-tech Figure 2.6.1

The Site


page 22

DISTRIBUTION OF SOCIAL FACILITIES 2.7

• There are no facilities in the settlement. Residents access facilities such as schools in nearby villages.

• The fact that a clinic is not available is also a concern, however services such as mobile clinics are an option to areas that do not necessarily meet the threshold of health facilities provision in the area

• There is no police station nearby.

• IT will be extremely difficult to provide facilities to an area that does not meet the population thresholds required to be sustain them. However education facilities are minimal for this community. The provision of mobile clinics to visit the area is a requirement.


page 23

Distribution of Social Facilities Figure 2.7.1


page 24

CURRENT SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2.8

• The Ngqushwa SDF does not necessarily make proposals for the area that covers Qaga.

• The Proposed Human Settlement Project is in line with the SDF.


page 25

Current Spatial Development Framework Figure 2.8.1

The Site


page 26

APPROVAL BY COUNCIL 2.9

• Awaiting Council Resolution


page 27

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2.10

2.10.1 SUMMARY

•The site was inspected on 10/01/2014 and the conclusions below ground-truthed.

•There are adequate engineering services. (K&T to confirm)

•There are no environmental concerns affecting the proposed Human Settlement Project. It should not trigger an EIA.

•A detailed geo-technical site visit inspection and, if necessary, survey will be required prior to the project commencing.

•The project comprises 500 subsidy units onto existing plots .

•Awaiting beneficiary list from the municipality for this project.

•There are no new social facilities required to support the proposed human settlements project.

•The Human Settlement Project is in line with the SDF.

•Awaiting Council Resolution from the municipality.

2.10.2 RECOMMENDATIONS

•The project is feasible.

•In light of this assessment it is recommended that the award of subsidies can proceed in Qaga.

Date post:	08-Jan-2016
Category:	Documents
Upload:	ojal
View:	24 times
Download:	0 times

PRELIMINARY DRAFT not for circulation

Documents