22
Preliminary results ASFCC-phase I Son La province and Nghe An province, Vietnam Pham Thu Thuy, Moira Moeliono and Le Ngoc Dung
Preliminary results ASFCC-phase I Son La province and Nghe An province,
Vietnam Pham Thu Thuy, Moira Moeliono and Le Ngoc Dung
ASFCC-I in Indonesia • Lay village in Moc Chau District, Son La
Province and Que village in Con Cuong District, Nghe An Province
• Forested areas with shifting cultivation • Ethnic diversity: Dayak Iban (Bunut Lalau,
Sungai Telian and Keluin), Dayak Embaloh (Banua Tengah)
• Located within/near protected areas • Forest Land Allocation, I-REDD+ project
or PES • Migration
The team
Pham Thu Thuy Nguyen Dinh Tien Le Manh Thang Le Ngoc Dung
What did we do ?
Focus group discussions
Son La Nghe An Male group 17 15
Female group 19 16
Youth group 15 17
What did we do ?
• Surveys
Son La Nghe An
# of respondents ego-network survey
48 40
# of respondents organizational survey
6 5
FGD results
Networks and their importance to local livelihoods
Son La Nghe An Male group
Female group
Youth group
Male group
Female group
Youth group
Agriculture system 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st Infrastructure development
2nd 2nd 2nd
(men) 3rd
Social network/mass organizations
4th 2nd(wom
en) 4th 2nd
Migration 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd Public health 5th 3rd
Education 2nd Trading network 2nd
Selection of system for ego-network survey Name of system Criteria 1
Actors (potential) Criteria 2 Benefit sharing
Criteria 3 Monitoring & reporting
Criteria 4 Land use change
1. Agriculture production
Local people/ farmers, government extension agents, traders, leaders and members of the forest management board, forest protection unit, commune and village leaders.
Government subsidies (seeds and inputs), training; special subsidies for the poor; trade and exchange of information; benefits from involvement in the forest protection programs
Potential monitoring via village committee, residents and project visits
Contribution to strengthening permanent agriculture/ alternative livelihoods to reduce overharvesting/conversion of forest
Selection of system for ego-network survey
Name of system Criteria 1 Actors (potential)
Criteria 2 Benefit sharing
Criteria 3 Monitoring & reporting
Criteria 4 Land use change
2. Social organizations
Cross-border, provincial and district traders, provincial and district government, community leaders, residents
Information and production inputs, access to markets, credits and loans,
Subnational government agricultural data, traders’ accounting
Conversion to maize, com-modification of lands previously used only for subsistence
Ego Network survey
Participation in network, by gender (Agr network)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Male Female Male Female
Son La Nghe An
No
Yes
Participation in network, by gender (Social network)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Male Female Male Female
Son La Nghe An
No
Yes
Most important actor in Agr Network
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Farmer organization Veterinary officers Village leaders Neighbor Trader Agriculture extensionofficer
Nghe An
Son La
Most important actor in Soc-Org network
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Head ofWomenUnion
Head ofFarmer
Association
Veteran Neighbor Head ofElder Union
Villageleader
Agricultureextension
officer
Police Army Head ofYouthUnion
Head ofSecuritygroup
Nghe An
Son La
Other source of information and network
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Male Female Male Female
Nghe An Son La
Police man
Construction worker
Official document
Neighbor
Commune clinic
Village meeting
Friends outside village
Attitude on migration
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Male Female Male Female
Son La Nghe An
Maintenance
Better
Harder
Migration: benefits
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
male female male female
Son La Nghe An
Receiving money fromhousehold members whomigrate to other places
Assets (Cattle, poultry…)
Labor exchange
Receiving land from migrantpeople
Other supports (take care of kids, staying in relative's home etc…)
Migration: disadvantages
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
male female male female
Son La Nghe An
Lack of labor
Money sent to migratedpeople
Swidden
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Male Female Male Female
Nghe An Son La
Next year No
Next year Yes
This year No
This year Yes
Last year No
Last year Yes
Willingness to participate in REDD+/PES
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Male Female Male Female
Nghe An Son La
No
Yes
To do
• Analysis of organization survey • Network analysis
