Date post: | 02-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | priscilla-jones |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
CAMBODIAN MAKONG UNIVERSITY
Prepared By: Mr. Hou Heng
MN201ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIORCHAPTER
9POWER AND
INFLUENCE IN THE WORKPLACE
GROUP
2Lecturer:
Mr. LONG BUNTENG
LEARNING OBJECTIVE
Define the meaning of power and counter power.Describe the five bases of power in organizations.Explain how information relates to power in
organization.Discuss the four contingencies of power.Summarize the eight types of influence tactics.Discuss three contingencies to consider when
deciding which influence tactic to use.Distinguish influence from organizational politics.Describe the organization conditions and personal
characteristics that support organization politics.Identify ways to minimize organizational politics.
THE MEANING OF POWER
Power is the capacity of a person, team, or organization to influence others.
Counter power is the capacity of a person, team, or organization to keep a more powerful person or group in the exchange relationship.
Person A
Person B Person B`s goal
Counter PowerPower
SOURCES OF POWER IN ORGANIZATIONS
Legitimate Power Agreement among organizational members. Reward Power The person`s ability to control allocation of rewards valued by others. Coercive Power The ability to apply punishment.
SOURCES OF POWER IN ORGANIZATIONS
Expert Power Individual`s or work unit`s capacity to influence others by possessing knowledge. Referent Power When others identify with them, like them, or otherwise respect them. Information and Power
Employees gain power by controlling the flow of information that others need.
CONTINGENCIES OF POWER
Substitutability Refers to the availability of alternatives. Power is strongest when someone has a monopoly over a valued resource. Centrality The degree and nature of interdependence between powrholder and others. Discretion The freedom to exercise judgment. To make decisions without referring to a specific rule or receiving permission from someone else.
CONTINGENCIES OF POWER
Visibility Refers to the idea that power increases to the extent that a person`s or work unit`s competencies are known to others.
INFLUENCING OTHERS
Influence is any behavior that attempts to alter another person`s attitudes or behavior. Types of Influence Tactics• Silent Authority: someone complies with a
request.• Assertiveness: legitimate and coercive power to
influence others.• Information Control: involves explicitly
manipulating others` access to information for the purpose of changing their attitudes or behavior, or both.
INFLUENCING OTHERS
• Coalition Formation: a group that attempts to influence people outside the group by pooling the resources and power of its members.
• Upward Appeal: a type of coalition in which one of the members is someone with higher authority or expertise.• Ingratiation: any attempt to increase the extent to which a target person likes us or perceives that he or she is similar to us.• Persuasion: using logical arguments, facts, and
emotional appeals to encourage people to accept a request or message.
INFLUENCING OTHERS
• Exchange: the promise of benefits or resources in exchange for the target person`s compliance with your request.
The three ways that people react when others to influence them:• Resistance• Compliance• Commitment
INFLUENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL POLITICS
Organizational Politics is the behavior that others perceive as self-serving tactics for personal gain at the expense of other people and possibly the organization. Organizational politics flourishes under the
right conditions. Employees apply political strategies to protect
their valued resources, position, and self- image. Machiavellian values is the belief that deceit is a
natural and acceptable way to influence others and to achieve goal.
INFLUENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL POLITICS
Organizational politics can be minimized by
• Providing clear rules for resource allocation.
• Engaging in effective organizational change.
• Supporting team norms and a corporate culture
that discourage dysfunctional politics.• Having leaders who role model
organizational citizenship rather than political savvy.