+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Preparing for the IMO Performance Standard for Protective...

Preparing for the IMO Performance Standard for Protective...

Date post: 07-Feb-2018
Category:
Upload: duongkien
View: 225 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
12
1 Preparing for the IMO Performance Standard for Protective Coatings Lloyd’s Register Asia Preparing for the IMO Performance Standard for Protective Coatings, (PSPC). Sven Mortensen Senior Marine Coating Specialist, China Business Development Lloyd’s Register Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge Content of presentation.. Why PSPC ??? Time line of PSPC Lloyds Registers involvement in PSPC, Globally and in China GAP-Analysis in China, Europe General findings in Chinese GAP-analysis Lloyds Register and NACE training in Shanghai for Chinese Shipyards (Approx. 140 ship-yard QC to be qualified to NACE level II) Surveyors training for qualifying course (5 days) Specially designed Training for Ship-owners / Ship-yard on PSPC (2 days not qualifying) Ship-right notation for PSPC complying Lloyds Register vessels Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge WHY PSPC??
Transcript

1

Preparing for the IMO Performance Standard for Protective CoatingsLloyd’s Register Asia

Preparing for the IMO Performance Standard for

Protective Coatings, (PSPC).

Sven MortensenSenior Marine Coating Specialist,

China Business DevelopmentLloyd’s Register

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Content of presentation..

• Why PSPC ???• Time line of PSPC• Lloyds Registers involvement in PSPC, Globally and in China• GAP-Analysis in China, Europe• General findings in Chinese GAP-analysis• Lloyds Register and NACE training in Shanghai for Chinese

Shipyards (Approx. 140 ship-yard QC to be qualified to NACE level II)

• Surveyors training for qualifying course (5 days)• Specially designed Training for Ship-owners / Ship-yard on PSPC (2

days not qualifying) • Ship-right notation for PSPC complying Lloyds Register vessels

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

WHY PSPC??

2

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Draft PSPC (DE49)

Adoption of PSPC8th Dec.

2007.1.12006 20082006.1.1 2008.1.1

IMO Performance Standard for Protective Coatings

Basic Concepts IMO PSPC WBT – Dates of coming into force

2009.1.1 2012.7.1

If no contract, then keel laying1st Jan.

Delivery1st July

Contract signing1st July

PSPC mandatory for IACS CSR ships PSPC mandatory for all SOLAS ships Above 500 GT

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

The IMO Performance Standard for Protective Coatings, (PSPC).

LRLR’’s PSPC Activitiess PSPC Activities::

•• Involvement in developing IACS & IMO RegulationsInvolvement in developing IACS & IMO Regulations

•• First to offer PSPC seminars to shipyards and ownersFirst to offer PSPC seminars to shipyards and owners

•• Only Class Society to offer PSPC gap analysisOnly Class Society to offer PSPC gap analysis

•• Only Class Society to provide NACE training to shipyardsOnly Class Society to provide NACE training to shipyards

•• Coating specialists recruitedCoating specialists recruited

•• Internal training of surveyors in progress, for both Europe Internal training of surveyors in progress, for both Europe

and Asiaand Asia

•• Delivering Training for shipDelivering Training for ship--owners, for corrosion / paint owners, for corrosion / paint

chemistry and PSPC (2 day course) chemistry and PSPC (2 day course)

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Activity in EMEA

• Presentations for Ship-owners / shipyards

• GAP-analysis• More than 34 GAP-analysis carried out in 10 countries

3

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Activity in EMEA

General comments from EMEA GAP’s:

• Only little or no QC department

• No records or only very little

• Work procedure not structured

• In many, especially “old” east European shipyards, need extreme investment, to comply with PSPC

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

PSPC seminars to industry in China

• Seminars delivered in January 2007 & 2008, in 12 sessions around China’s main ship building locations.

• Attended by owner’s, manager’s, designers, builders and paint manufacturer’s.

• Attended by over 300 delegates from yard president’s to paint applicators

• Objectives:• To raise profile of PSPC and it’s

challenges• To start open discussion with Chinese

industry• To gather feedback on areas of support

needed

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Introduction: Gap analysis from Lloyds Register and International Paint

• Provides assistance to ship yards on practical guidance on preparations for the IMO PSPC.

• Provides guidance and assistance on practical aspects of coating application and the equipment and infrastructure required.

• Provides guidance on interpretation of the standard and procedure and document preparation and implementation.

• Till date more than 45 GAP-analysis carried out in china

4

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

International Paint-Lloyd’s Register Surveys

GSI

Wenchong

Xiamen

Fuzhou

Chuangdong

Wuchang

DSIC

Xingang

Bohai

Jinling (Old & New)

Shanhaiguan

Beihai

Dayang (New)

Jiangnan Changxing

PL1/PL3

Chengxi

Yangzijiang(Old & New)

NCS & NTS

J.E.S.

Rongsheng

Hantong

COSCO Dalian

CSIC

CSSC

CSC

Sino Pacific

Private

COSCO

COSCO Zhoushan

COSCO Guangzhou

Yichang Damen

TQSL

Huang PuLongxue

Wuhu Xinlian ZheJiang ZhengHe

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

Primary surface preparation and shop primer application

Oil contamination are in some shipyards a big problem

Dust problems

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

Uneven primer application increases level of re-blasting during secondary surface preparation

5

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

Primary surface preparation and shop primer application

• Recommendations:

• Introduce plate cleaning

• QC procedure to be in place• Adjust abrasive size and mix abrasives to achieve better

profile

• Abrasive quality checks

• Adjust line speed to ensure full coverage

• Upgrade facilities to reduce dust level

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspectsSecondary surface preparation – oil contamination

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Secondary surface preparation – edge preparation.

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

6

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

Secondary surface preparation – Housekeeping

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

Secondary surface preparation

• Recommendations:

• QC procedure to be in place

• Better housekeeping

• More attention to details on edge preparation

• Carry out as much fairing/ outfitting welding work as possible prior to blasting

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

Hull stage – coating damages due to fairing and welding work

7

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

200mm

300mm

100mm

Erection seam

Reserved weld

Erection joint area

Contributes to damaged areas

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

Poor cooperation between production departments

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

Hull stage – extensive coating damages

8

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

Hull stage

• Recommendations

• Cooperation from other departments to minimise coating damages

• QC procedure to be in place• Better housekeeping

• Better design/production management – reduce width of erection seam.

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

PSPC worries for some Chinese Shipyard in general

• QC related items;

• To produce a CTF (Coating Technical File) and follow up on it

• Produce the forms (Daily log, Primary surface prep, Secondary surface prep, Paint application, Non-Conformance Report NCR, etc.)

• Qualify inspectors

• Training applicators (to avoid rejections)

• Making procedures for surface treatment, inspections etc.

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

The not so good:

9

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

The better:

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

The good:

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

The very best:

10

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

PSPC worries for Chinese / European Shipyard in general (unquoted)

• Production wise:

• Might reduce production

• Might have to develop new procedures for outfitting and ship building departments (to avoid damaged)

• 2% limit for mechanical damaged

(Power tool or grit-blast)

• Have to carry out surface treatment according to PSPC (Ship-owners and paint-manufactures to be “active”paint inspectors)

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Findings of Gap Analysis – technical aspects

PSPC worries for Chinese / European Shipyard in general (un quoted)

• Shipyard comments in general, and the facts:

• Secondary surface preparation, now we have to grit-blast to Sa2½ on damaged and corroded areas and either hard or light sweep blast of intact shop-primer

• Yes, but what are they doing now? As above in most cases

• We have to apply Two full coats and two stripe-coats to be applied at min. DFT 320µ, Extra cost for the shipyard..

• Yes, but in most cases today, they apply for example 2 * 125µ and one or two stripe-coats, and in many / most cases with a average DFT of approx. 450 – 500µ

• How to calculate the 2 % damaged “in-situ”• IACS and JWG have stipulated some guidelines for calculating, but in general it is

important to have a very experience “approved” paint inspector.

• We have to produce and maintain a CTF before and during building of the vessel. • Yes..

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

NACE Training for LR’s Client Shipyard’s Personnel

• Training being facilitated by Lloyd’s Register, China

• Training delivered to shipyard coating inspectors in Mandarin

• Training Delivered by NACE Certified Trainers

• A first for China.

• Approx 150 attendees and a graduation level for NACE CIP I & II approx 95%

11

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Internal Training for LR’s Surveyors on PSPC

• Special designed training for LR surveyors first held in Korea for Chinese & Korea Surveyors.

• 5 day course, both practical and theoretical

• Give the surveyor enough knowledge to monitor, verify and approve PSPC vessels

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

Future; develop training course for Ship-owners building in the region.

• A special designed course for ship-owners on corrosion / Paint chemistry and PSPC

• Will give ship-owners a thoroughly knowledge upon IMO MSC 215 (82) PSPC; PR 34 and SC 223 & LR guidelines

• 2 day course for Ship-owners & their representatives building in China or World wide.

• Will focus on Ship – owners duties and responsibilities with PSPC

• The course will NOT be a qualifying course, but an informative and educational.

• Till date 3 courses given in; Shanghai, Piraeus, and Dubai

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

LR’s Developments:

• ShipRight ACS Notations (Anti - Corrosion System)

• For all vessels fulfilling the requirements in IMO MSC 215 (82) PSPC

• Notation for all vessels build to PSPC or / and CSR vessels will under LR class get ShipRight ACS (B) notation (B= Ballast-tanks)

• Notation for all bulk carriers build to CSR (PSPC) will under LR class get ShipRight ACS (B,D) notation (B = Ballast tanks and D = Double - side skin spaces)

12

Re-view, 2 years with PSPC, preparation & meeting the challenge

LR Practical Guidance and Assistance

LR’s commitments:• Fulfil Class’s / RO’s responsibility required by PSPC

• Provide assistance to yards and owners through:

• Clear interpretation of PSPC by providing training/seminars• Developing practical guidelines • Work together with shipyards to develop practical verification

procedures• Develop services that can improve yard compliance with PSPC:

• Inspector training courses facilitated and approved• Yard coating process quality control approval

• Technical advice and assistance in R&D

Preparing for the IMO Performance Standard for Protective CoatingsLloyd’s Register Asia

Preparing for IMO Performance Standard for Protective Coatings,

(PSPC).

Thank you for your time, any questions are

welcome.

For further information please contact Lloyd’s Register Asia:

Sven Mortensen,Senior Marine Coating specialist, China Marine Business Development,E: [email protected]: +86 (0) 21 5158 1017M: +86 1360 165 6391


Recommended