Date post: | 06-Aug-2015 |
Category: |
Business |
Upload: | rebekah-heusel |
View: | 45 times |
Download: | 0 times |
The Problem
• The Knox College Recycling system could be more effective • Current waste removal expenses per year- $20,000-25,000
• Current recycling removal expenses per year- $3,000
• Current recycling • 70.64 tons
Waste Receptacles on Campus by Location
Location Trash bin only Recycle bin only Both bins
Apartment housing 5 0 0
SMC and Sororities 5 0 1
Quads and Post Hall 8 0 1
Fraternities, Theme Houses 3 0 1
Borzello Hall and Old Jail area 3 0 0
Central Academic Buildings, Track, Gym
22 7 12
Knosher Bowl and Fields 5 0 0
Campus Total:
51
7
15
All data was collected November 2nd, 2013 by Robin Delaquess and Rebekah Heusel
Proposal
• Ideal Solution• Switch to a duo waste container system (recycling and garbage)
• Add sorted recycling in Post Hall
• Total cost - $30,800 (each bin $700)
• Realistic solution• 14 new recycling bins in key locations
• add sorted recycling in Post Hall
• Total cost- $9,800
Proposal- why the price difference-
• For a complete duo recycling system we would need 44 new bins
• 14 bins in select areas would still be effective• 2- apartment housing
• 8- two at each field (four fields total)
• 2- quads
• 1- gizmo patio
• 1- townhouses
• This would only mean the 4 current student workers who collect recycling would need to pick up an additional 3-4 bins
Waste Receptacles on Campus by Location
Location Trash bin only
Recycle bin only
Both bins
Apartment housing 5 0 0
SMC and Sororities 5 0 1
Quads and Post Hall 8 0 1
Fraternities, Theme Houses
3 0 1
Borzello Hall and Old Jail area
3 0 0
Central Academic Buildings, Track, and Gym
22 7 12
Knosher Bowl and Fields 5 0 0
Campus Total:
51
7
15
Effects
• With the ideal solution we would expect to see a 154% increase in recycling tonnage• Note- Based on increase at Denison University
• With the modified solution of 14 bins we would expect to see a 49% increase• Percent increase is based on peer institutions implementing
similar policies
Peer Institutions
Denison University
• Recycling increase• 2004-05 = 130 tons
• 2011-12 = 330 tons
• 154% recycling increase
• Implement duo recycling bin system outdoors
• Have sorted recycling areas throughout campus
Luther College
• 1994- 60% items in one days
trash pick up were recyclable
materials
• Total recycling = approx.
160.9 tons
• Sustainable Endowments
institute gave an “A” Rating
(one of 26 colleges)
Denison University Recycling
Recycling Report. Rep. Denison University, 2012. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. < http://denison.edu/forms/recycling-report >.
Big Picture Environmental Impact
• Energy saved by using recycled materials • Aluminum- 95%
• Glass- 50%
• Paper- 60%
• Just by recycling paper, aluminum, and plastic you would save 44.3 cubic yards of landfill space per 3 tons of recycling
Resources saved by recycling one ton of material.*
Material (one ton)
Kilowatt hours
Barrels of oil Btu's of energy
Yd3 landfill space
Aluminum 14,000 40 238 million 10
Office Paper
4,100 9 54 million 3.3
Plastic 5,774 16.3 98 million 30
"Frequently Asked Questions: Benefits of Recycling." Buildings & Grounds Maintenance. Stanford University, Fall 2000. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. <http://bgm.stanford.edu/pssi_faq_benefits>.
Environmental Impact
• Currently recycle 70.64 tons • with implementation of 14 bins with an increase of 49% we expect
to increase recycling to 105.25 tons
• That would total a savings of 1554 cubic yards of land fill space• Remember that is only accounting for plastic, paper, and
aluminum