Presentation of financial stmt ias 1, 10, 24,

ICAN IFRS CERTIFICATION TRAINING PROGRAMME

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, EVENTS AFTER

REPORTING PERIOD & RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES

–IAS 1, 10 & 24

PRESENTED BY DEJI AWOBOTUCHIEF EXECUTIVE

ADRAC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED

ADRAC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED 08035487820

2

PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT

IAS 1

3

CONTENTSObjectiveScope of IAS 1Definition of Key TermsPurpose & Components of Financial

StatementsGeneral CommentsStructure & Contents Disclosures



4

OBJECTIVE of ias 1IAS 1 provides guidelines on the

presentation of the “general purpose financial statements,” thereby ensuring comparability both with the entity’s financial statements of previous periods and with those of other entities.

It provides overall requirements for the presentation of financial statements, guidance on their structure, and the minimum requirements for their content.

It also prescribes the components of the financial statements that together would be considered a complete set of financial statements.

5

SCOPE OF IAS 1The requirements of IAS 1 are to be applied

to all “general purpose financial statements” that have been prepared and presented in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). “General purpose financial statements” are those intended to meet the needs of users who are not in a position to demand reports that are tailored according to their information needs.

IAS 1 is not applicable to condensed interim financial statements prepared according to IAS 34.

Modification of the presentation requirements of the Standard may be required by nonprofit entities and those entities whose share capital is not equity.


6

DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS

Impracticable. Applying a requirement becomes impracticable when the entity cannot apply a requirement despite all reasonable efforts to do so.

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Standards and interpretations adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). They include

International Financial Reporting Standards International Accounting Standards Interpretations originated by the International

Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) or the former Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC)

Material. An item is deemed to be material if its omission or misstatement would influence the economic decisions of a user taken on the basis of the financial statements. Materiality is determined based on the item’s nature, size, and/or the surrounding circumstances.


7

DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS Notes to financial statements. A collection of

information providing descriptions and disaggregated information relating to items included in the financial statements (i.e., balance sheet, income statement, statement of changes in equity, and cash flow statement), as well as those that do not appear in the financial statements but are disclosed due to requirements of IFRS.

“Materiality” as a concept has been the subject of debate for years yet there are no clear-cut parameters to compute materiality. What would normally be expected to influence one person’s viewpoint may not necessarily influence another person’s economic decisions based on the financial statements. Furthermore, materiality is not only “quantitative” (i.e., measured in terms of numbers) but also “qualitative” (because it depends not only on the “size” of the item but also on the “nature” of the item). For instance, in some cases, transactions with “related parties” (as defined under IAS 24), although not material when the size of the transactions is considered, may be considered “material” because they are with related parties (This is where the “qualitative” aspect of the definition of the term “material” comes into play). Materiality is therefore a very subjective concept.



8

PURPOSE & COMPONENTS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements provide stakeholders with information about the entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows by providing information about its assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses, other changes in equity, and cash flows.

Components of Financial Statements Statement of Financial Position : Assets, Equity &

Liabilities Statement of Comprehensive Income : Income,

Expense & other comprehensive income Statement of Changes in Equity : All changes in

equity or changes other than those with equity holders

Statement of Cashflow : Cash inflows and outflows from operating, investing and financing activities

Explanatory Notes : Significant Accounting Policies and Explanatory Notes

9

GENERAL COMMENTSFair Presentation and Compliance with IFRS “Fair presentation” implies that the financial

statements “present fairly” (or alternatively, in some jurisdictions [countries], present a “true and fair” view) of the financial position, financial performance, and cash flows of an entity.

“Fair presentation” requires faithful representation of the effects of transactions and other events and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities, income, and expenses laid down in the IASB’s Framework. The application of IFRS, with additional disclosure where required, is expected to result in financial statements that achieve a “fair presentation.”

Under IAS 1, entities are required to make an explicit statement of compliance with IFRS in their notes if their financial statements comply with IFRS.

By disclosure of the accounting policies used or notes or explanatory material, an entity cannot correct inappropriate accounting policies.



10

GENERAL COMMENTS In practice, some entities believe that even if an

inappropriate accounting policy were used in presenting the financial statements (say, use of “cash basis” as opposed to the “accrual basis” to account for certain expenses), as long as it is disclosed by the entity in notes to the financial statements, the problem would be rectified. Recognizing this tendency, IAS 1 categorically prohibits such shortcut methods from being employed by entities presenting financial statements under IFRS.

In extremely rare circumstances, if management believes that compliance with a particular requirement of the IFRS will be so misleading that it would conflict with the objectives of the financial statements as laid down in the IASB’s Framework, then the entity is allowed to depart from that requirement (of the IFRS), provided the relevant regulatory framework does not prohibit such a departure. This is referred to as “true and fair override” in some jurisdictions. In such circumstances, it is incumbent upon the entity that departs from a requirement of IFRS to disclose

a) That management has concluded that the financial statements present fairly the entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows


11

GENERAL COMMENTSb) That it has complied with all applicable Standards and

Interpretations except that it has departed from a particular requirement to achieve fair presentation

c) The title of the Standard or the Interpretation from which the entity has departed, the nature of the departure, including the treatment that the Standard or Interpretation would require, the reason why that treatment would be misleading in the circumstances that it would conflict with the objective of the financial statements set out in the Framework, and the treatment adopted

d) The financial impact on each item in the financial statements of such a departure for each period presented

Furthermore, in the extremely rare circumstances when management concludes that compliance with the requirements in a Standard or Interpretation would be so misleading that it would conflict with the IASB’s Framework but where the relevant regulatory framework prohibits such departure, the entity shall, to the maximum extent possible, reduce the perceived misleading aspects of compliance by disclosing: the title of the Standard or Interpretation in question, the nature of the requirement, and the reason why management has concluded that complying with that requirement is so misleading that it conflicts with the IASB’s Framework, and, for each period presented, the adjustments to each item in the financial statements that management has concluded would be necessary to achieve a fair presentation.

12

GENERAL COMMENTSGoing ConcernFinancial statements should be prepared on a

going concern basis unless management intends to liquidate the entity or cease trading or has no realistic option but to do so. When upon assessment it becomes evident that there are material uncertainties regarding the ability of the business to continue as a going concern, those uncertainties should be disclosed.

In the event that the financial statements are not prepared on a going concern basis, that fact should be disclosed, together with the basis on which they are prepared along with the reason for such a decision.

In making the assessment about the going concern assumption, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least 12 months from the balance sheet date.



13

CASE STUDY

XYZ Inc. is a manufacturer of televisions. The domestic market for electronic goods is currently not doing well, and therefore many entities in this business are switching to exports. As per the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20XX, the entity had net losses of $2 million. At December 31, 20XX, its current assets aggregate to $20 million and the current liabilities aggregate to $25 million. Due to expected favorable changes in the government policies for the electronics industry, the entity is projecting profits in the coming years. Furthermore, the shareholders of the entity have arranged alternative additional sources of finance for its expansion plans and to support its working needs in the next 12 months.

Required• Should XYZ Inc. prepare its

financial statements under the going concern assumption?

Solution The two factors that raise doubts about

the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern are

i. The net loss for the year of $2 millionii. At the balance sheet date, the

working capital deficiency (current liabilities of $25 million) exceeds its current assets (of $20 million) by $5 million.

However, there are two mitigating factors:1) The shareholders’ ability to arrange

funding for the entity’s expansion and working capital needs

2) Projected future profitability due to expected favourable changes in government policies for the industry the entity is operating within

Based on these sets of factors—both negative and positive (mitigating) factors—it may be possible for the management of the entity to argue that the going concern assumption is appropriate and that any other basis of preparation of financial statements would be unreasonable at the moment. However, if matters deteriorate further instead of improving, then in the future another detailed assessment would be needed to ascertain whether the going concern assumption is still valid.

14

GENERAL COMMENTSAccrual Basis of AccountingExcluding the cash flow statement, all other

financial statements must be prepared on an accrual basis, whereby assets and liabilities are recognized when they are receivable or payable rather than when actually received or paid.

Consistency of PresentationEntities are required to retain their

presentation and classification of items in successive periods unless an alternative would be more appropriate or if so required by a Standard.

Materiality and AggregationEach material class of similar items shall be

presented separately in the financial statements. Material items that are dissimilar in nature or function should be separately disclosed.


15

GENERAL COMMENTSOffsetting Assets and liabilities, income and expenses cannot be offset

against each other unless required or permitted by a Standard or an Interpretation. Measuring assets net of allowances, for instance, presenting receivables net of allowance for doubtful debts, is not offsetting.

Furthermore, there are transactions other than those that an entity undertakes in the ordinary course of business that do not generate “revenue” (as defined under IAS 18); instead they are incidental to the main revenue generating activities. The results of these transactions are presented, when this presentation reflects the substance of the transaction or event, by netting any income with related expenses arising on the same transactions. For instance, gains or losses on disposal of noncurrent assets are reported by deducting from the proceeds on disposal the carrying amount of the assets and related selling expenses.

Comparative Information Comparative information (including narrative disclosures)

relating to the previous period should be reported alongside current period disclosure, unless otherwise required.

In case there is a change in the presentation or classification of items in the financial statements, the comparative information needs to be appropriately reclassified, unless it is impracticable to do so.


16

GENERAL COMMENTSIdentification of the Financial

StatementsFinancial statements should be clearly

identified from other information in the same published document (such as an annual report). Furthermore, the name of the entity, the period covered, presentation currency, and so on also must be displayed prominently.

Reporting PeriodFinancial statements should be presented

at least annually. In all other cases, that is, when a period shorter or longer than one year is used, the reason for using a different period and lack of total comparability with previous period information must be disclosed.


17

STRUCTURE & CONTENTSSTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION An entity must normally present a classified statement

of financial position, separating current and noncurrent assets and liabilities. Only if a presentation based on liquidity provides information that is reliable and more relevant may the current/noncurrent split be omitted.

In either case, if an asset (liability) category combines amounts that will be received (settled) after 12 months with assets (liabilities) that will be received (settled) within 12 months, note disclosure is required that separates the longer-term amounts from the 12-month amounts.

Current assets are cash; cash equivalent; assets held for collection, sale, or consumption within the entity's normal operating cycle; or assets held for trading within the next 12 months. All other assets are noncurrent.

Current liabilities are those expected to be settled within the entity's normal operating cycle or due within 12 months, or those held for trading, or those for which the entity does not have an unconditional right to defer payment beyond 12 months. Other liabilities are noncurrent.


18

STRUCTURE & CONTENTS If a liability has become payable on demand because an

entity has breached an undertaking under a long-term loan agreement on or before the reporting date, the liability is current, even if the lender has agreed, after the reporting date and before the authorisation of the financial statements for issue, not to demand payment as a consequence of the breach. However, the liability is classified as non-current if the lender agreed by the reporting date to provide a period of grace ending at least 12 months after the end of the reporting period, within which the entity can rectify the breach and during which the lender cannot demand immediate repayment.

Regarding issued share capital and reserves, the following disclosures are required:

numbers of shares authorised, issued and fully paid, and issued but not fully paid

par value reconciliation of shares outstanding at the beginning and

the end of the period description of rights, preferences, and restrictions treasury shares, including shares held by subsidiaries and

associates shares reserved for issuance under options and contracts a description of the nature and purpose of each reserve

within equity


19

STRUCTURE & CONTENTSSTATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Comprehensive income for a period includes profit or loss

for that period plus other comprehensive income recognised in that period.

All items of income and expense recognised in a period must be included in profit or loss unless a Standard or an Interpretation requires otherwise.

Some IFRSs require or permit that some components to be excluded from profit or loss and instead to be included in other comprehensive income. The components of other comprehensive income include:

changes in revaluation surplus (IAS 16 and 38) actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit plans

recognised in accordance with IAS 19 gains and losses arising from translating the financial

statements of a foreign operation (IAS 21) gains and losses on remeasuring financial assets at Fair

value through other comprehensive income (IAS 39) the effective portion of gains and losses on hedging

instruments in a cash flow hedge (IAS 39).



20

STRUCTURE & CONTENTS An entity has a choice of presenting: a single statement of comprehensive income or two statements: an income statement displaying components of profit

or loss and a statement of comprehensive income that begins

with profit or loss (bottom line of the income statement) and displays components of other comprehensive income.

The following items must also be disclosed in the statement of comprehensive income as allocations for the period:

profit or loss for the period attributable to non-controlling interests and owners of the parent

total comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests and owners of the parent

21

STRUCTURE & CONTENTS Additional line items may be needed to fairly present the entity's

results of operations. No items may be presented in the statement of comprehensive

income (or in the income statement, if separately presented) or in the notes as 'extraordinary items'.

Certain items must be disclosed separately either in the statement of comprehensive income or in the notes, if material, including:

write-downs of inventories to net realisable value or of property, plant and equipment to recoverable amount, as well as reversals of such write-downs

restructurings of the activities of an entity and reversals of any provisions for the costs of restructuring

disposals of items of property, plant and equipment disposals of investments discontinuing operations litigation settlements other reversals of provisions Expenses recognised in profit or loss should be analysed either by

nature (raw materials, staffing costs, depreciation, etc.) or by function (cost of sales, selling, administrative, etc). If an entity categorises by function, then additional information on the nature of expenses – at a minimum depreciation, amortisation and employee benefits expense – must be disclosed.



22

STRUCTURE & CONTENTSSTATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY IAS 1 requires an entity to present a statement of changes

in equity as a separate component of the financial statements. The statement must show:

total comprehensive income for the period, showing separately amounts attributable to owners of the parent and to non-controlling interests

the effects of retrospective application, when applicable, for each component

reconciliations between the carrying amounts at the beginning and the end of the period for each component of equity, separately disclosing:

profit or loss each item of other comprehensive income transactions with owners, showing separately contributions

by and distributions to owners and changes in ownership interests in subsidiaries that do not result in a loss of control

The following amounts may also be presented on the face of the statement of changes in equity, or they may be presented in the notes:

amount of dividends recognised as distributions, and the related amount per share


23

STRUCTURE & CONTENTS

Notes to the Financial Statements The notes must: present information about the basis of preparation of

the financial statements and the specific accounting policies used

disclose any information required by IFRSs that is not presented elsewhere in the financial statements and provide additional information that is not presented elsewhere in the financial statements but is relevant to an understanding of any of them

Notes should be cross-referenced from the face of the financial statements to the relevant note.

IAS 1 suggests that the notes should normally be presented in the following order:

a statement of compliance with IFRSs a summary of significant accounting policies applied,

including:


24

STRUCTURE & CONTENTS the measurement basis (or bases) used in

preparing the financial statements the other accounting policies used that are

relevant to an understanding of the financial statements

supporting information for items presented on the face of the statement of financial position (balance sheet), statement of comprehensive income (and income statement, if presented), statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flows, in the order in which each statement and each line item is presented

other disclosures, including:contingent liabilities and unrecognised

contractual commitmentsnon-financial disclosures, such as the entity's

financial risk management objectives and policies.


25

DISCLOSURES Disclosure of judgements. an entity must disclose,

in the summary of significant accounting policies or other notes, the judgements, apart from those involving estimations, that management has made in the process of applying the entity's accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements.

Examples cited in IAS 1 include management's judgements in determining:

whether financial assets are held-to-maturity investments

when substantially all the significant risks and rewards of ownership of financial assets and lease assets are transferred to other entities

whether, in substance, particular sales of goods are financing arrangements and therefore do not give rise to revenue; and

whether the substance of the relationship between the entity and a special purpose entity indicates control


26

DISCLOSURESDisclosure of key sources of estimation uncertainty. an entity must

disclose, in the notes, information about the key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year. These disclosures do not involve disclosing budgets or forecasts.

The following other note disclosures are required by IAS 1 if not disclosed elsewhere in information published with the financial statements:

domicile and legal form of the entity country of incorporation address of registered office or principal place of business description of the entity's operations and principal

activities if it is part of a group, the name of its parent and the

ultimate parent of the group if it is a limited life entity, information regarding the length

of the life

27

DISCLOSURESOther Disclosures Disclosures about Dividends In addition to the distributions information in the statement of

changes in equity, the following must be disclosed in the notes:" the amount of dividends proposed or declared before the financial statements were authorised for issue but not recognised as a distribution to owners during the period, and the related amount per share and " the amount of any cumulative preference dividends not recognised.

Capital Disclosures An entity should disclose information about its objectives,

policies and processes for managing capital. To comply with this, the disclosures include:

qualitative information about the entity's objectives, policies and processes for managing capital, including description of capital it manages nature of external capital requirements, if any how it is meeting its objectives

quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital changes from one period to another whether the entity has complied with any external capital

requirements and if it has not complied, the consequences of such non-

compliance.



28

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FORMATStatement of Comprehensive Income

ABC LTDIncome Statement for the year ended 31st December, 20XX

N N

Revenue X

Cost of Sales (X)

Gross Profit X

Distribution Cost XAdmin Expenses X

(X)

Profit from Operations X

Finance Cost (X)

Investment Income XProfit before Tax XTax (X)Profits for the year

XOther comprehensive Income: Gain/Loss on property revaluation XActuarial gains or losses on defined benefit plans

XExchange difference from translation of foreign entity’s fin stat.

XGain/ Losses from valuation of equity investment instrument measured at fair

value through other comprehensive income

X XTotal comprehensive Income for the year

X


29

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FORMATIncome Statement

ABC LTDIncome Statement for the year

ended 31st December, 20XX

N NRevenue

XCost of Sales XGross Profit

XDistribution Cost XAdmin Expenses X

(X)Profit from Operations

XFinance Cost

(X)Investment Income

XProfit before Tax

XTax

(X)Profits for the year

X

Statement of Other Comprehensive Income

for the year ended 31st December, 20XX

N N

Profit for the yearX

Other comprehensive Income

Gain/Loss on property revaluation X

Actuarial gains or losses on defined benefit plans

XExchange difference from

translation of foreign entity’s fin stat.

XGain/ Losses from valuation of

equity investment instrument measured

at fair value through other compre.

income X XTotal comprehensive Income for

the year X


30

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FORMAT

ABC LTDStatement of Financial Position

as at 31 December 20X2Assets

N NNon-current assets:Property, plant and equipment

XInvestments

XIntangibles

X

XCurrent assets:Inventories

XTrade receivables

XCash and cash equivalents

X

XTotal assets

X

Equity and liabilitiesCapital and reserves:Share capital

XRetained earnings

XOther components of equity

X Total equity

XNon-current liabilities:Long-term borrowings

XDeferred tax

X

XCurrent liabilities:Trade and other payables

XShort-term borrowings XCurrent tax payable

XShort-term provisions

X

XTotal equity and liabilities

X


31

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FORMATABC LTD

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY Share capital Share premium

Revaluation Retained earnings Total equityBalance at 31 December 20X1 X X

X X XChange in accounting policy/prior year error

(X) (X)Restated balance X X

X X XDividends

(X) (X)Issue of share capital X X

XProfit for the year

X XRevaluation gain/loss

X XTransfer to retained earnings

(X) X ---Balance at 31 December 20X2 X X

X X X


32

EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

IAS 10

33

CONTENTS

ObjectiveScope of IAS 10Definition of Key TermsAuthorization DateAdjusting & Non adjusting

Events (After the Reporting Period)

Disclosure Requirements



34

OBJECTIVE OF IAS 10The end of the reporting period is the pivotal

date at which the financial position of an entity is determined and reported. Thus, events that occur up to that date are critical in arriving at an entity’s financial results and the financial position.

However, sometimes events occurring after the reporting period may provide additional information about events that occurred before and up to the end of the reporting period. This information may have an impact on the financial results and the financial position of the entity. It is imperative that those post–reporting period events up to a certain “cutoff date” (referred to as the authorization date) be taken into account in preparing the financial statements for the year ended and at the end of the reporting period.

35

OBJECTIVE OF IAS 10

Additionally, certain events that occur at the end of the reporting period might not affect the figures reported in the financial statements but may warrant disclosure in footnotes to the financial statements.

Informing users of financial statements about such post–reporting period events through footnote disclosures helps them make informed decisions with respect to the entity, keeping in mind the impact these post–reporting period events may have on the financial position of the entity at the end of the reporting period.


36

SCOPE OF IAS 10

IAS 10, Events After the Reporting Period provides guidance on accounting and disclosure of events after the reporting period. For the purposes of this Standard, post–reporting period events are categorized into “adjusting” and “nonadjusting” events.

The issue addressed by the Standard, IAS 10, is to what extent anything that happens during the period when the financial statements are being prepared should be reflected in those financial statements.

The Standard distinguishes between events that provide information about the state of the entity at the end of the reporting period and those that concern the next financial period.

A secondary issue is the cutoff point beyond which the financial statements are considered to be finalized.


37

DEFINITION OF KEY TERMSEvents after the Reporting Period:

Those post–reporting period events, both favorable and unfavorable, that occur between the end of the reporting period and the date when the financial statements are authorized for issue.

Adjusting events after the Reporting Period : Those post–reporting period events that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting period.

Nonadjusting events after the Reporting Period : Those post–reporting period events that are indicative of conditions that arose after the reporting period.


38

AUTHORIZATION DATE The authorization date is the date when the financial

statements could be considered legally authorized for issuance. The determination of the authorization date is critical to the concept of events after the reporting period.

The authorization date serves as the cutoff point after the reporting period up to which the post–reporting period events are to be examined in order to ascertain whether such events qualify for the treatment prescribed by IAS 10. This Standard explains the concept through the use of examples.

The general principles that need to be considered in determining the “authorization date” of the financial statements are set out next.

When an entity is required to submit its financial statements to its shareholders for approval after they have already been issued, the authorization date in this case would mean the date of original issuance and not the date when these are approved by the shareholders; and

When an entity is required to issue its financial statements to a supervisory board made up wholly of nonexecutives, “authorization date” would mean the date on which management authorizes them for issue to the supervisory board.



39

CASE STUDY The preparation of the financial

statements of Excellent Corp. for the accounting period ended December 31, 2005, was completed by the management on March 15, 2006. The draft financial statements were considered at the meeting of the board of directors held on March 20, 2006, on which date the board approved them and authorized them for issuance. The annual general meeting (AGM) was held on April 10, 2006, after allowing for printing and the requisite notice period mandated by the corporate statute. At the AGM the shareholders approved the financial statements. The approved financial statements were filed by the corporation with the Company Law Board (the statutory body of the country that regulates corporations) on April 20, 2006.

Required• Given these facts, what is the

“authorization date” in terms of IAS 10?Solution The date of authorization of the financial

statements of Excellent Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2005, is March 20, 2006, the date when the board approved them and authorized them for issue (and not the date they were approved in the AGM by the shareholders). Thus, all post–balance sheet events between December 31, 2005, and March 20, 2006, need to be considered by Excellent Corp. for the purposes of evaluating whether they are to be accounted or reported under IAS 10.

Suppose in the above-cited case, the management of Excellent Corp. was required to issue the financial statements to a supervisory board (consisting solely of nonexecutives including representatives of a trade union). The management of Excellent Corp. had issued the draft financial statements to the supervisory board on March 16, 2006. The supervisory board approved them on March 17, 2006, and the shareholders approved them in the AGM held on April 10, 2006. The approved financial statements were filed with the Company Law Board on April 20, 2006.

Required• Would the new facts have any effect

on the date of authorization?Solution• In this case, the date of authorization

of financial statements would be March 16, 2006, the date the draft financial statements were issued to the supervisory board. Thus, all post–balance sheet events between December 31, 2005, and March 16, 2006, need to be considered by Excellent Corp. for the purposes of evaluating whether they are to be accounted or reported under IAS 10.

40

Adjusting & nonadjusting events (AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD)Two kinds of events after the reporting period

are distinguished by the Standard. These are, respectively, “adjusting events after the reporting period” and “nonadjusting events after the reporting period.”

Adjusting events are those post–reporting period events that provide evidence of conditions that actually existed at the end of the reporting period, albeit they were not known at the time. Financial statements should be adjusted to reflect adjusting events after the end of the reporting period.

Typical examples of adjusting events areThe bankruptcy of a customer after the

reporting period usually suggests a loss of trade receivable at the end of the reporting period.

The sale of inventory at a price substantially lower than its cost after the reporting period confirms its net realizable value at the end of the reporting period.



41

Adjusting & nonadjusting events (AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD)

The sale of property, plant, and equipment for a net selling price that is lower than the carrying amount is indicative of an impairment before the end of the reporting period.

The determination of an incentive or bonus payment after the reporting period when an entity has a constructive obligation at the end of the reporting period

A deterioration in the financial position (recurring losses) and operating results (working capital deficiencies) of an entity that has a bearing on the entity’s continuance as a “going concern” in the foreseeable future.


42

CASE STUDY During the year 2005, Taj Corp. was sued by a competitor

for $15 million for infringement of a trademark. Based on the advice of the company’s legal counsel, Taj Corp. accrued the sum of $10million as a provision in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005. Subsequent to the end of the reporting period, on February 15, 2006, the Supreme Court decided in favor of the party alleging infringement of the trademark and ordered the defendant to pay the aggrieved party a sum of $14 million. The financial statements were prepared by the company’s management on January 31, 2006, and approved by the board on February 20, 2006.

Required• Should Taj Corp. adjust its financial statements for the

year ended December 31, 2005?Solution• Taj Corp. should adjust the provision upward by $4

million to reflect the award decreed by the Supreme Court (assumed to be the final appellate authority on the matter in this example) to be paid by Taj Corp. to its competitor. Had the judgment of the Supreme Court been delivered on February 25, 2005, or later, this post–reporting period event would have occurred after the cutoff point (i.e., the date the financial statements were authorized for original issuance). If so, adjustment of financial statements would not have been required.

Shiny Corp. carries its inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. At December 31, 2005, the cost of inventory, determined under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, as reported in its financial statements for the year then ended, was $10 million. Due to severe recession and other negative economic trends in the market, the inventory could not be sold during the entire month of January 2006. On February 10, 2006, Shiny Corp. entered into an agreement to sell the entire inventory to a competitor for $6 million.

Required• Presuming the financial

statements were authorized for issuance on February 15, 2006, should Shiny Corp. recognize a write-down of $4 million in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005?

Solution• Yes, Shiny Corp. should recognize

a write-down of $4 million in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005.

43


Examples of nonadjusting events includeDeclaration of an equity dividendDecline in the market value of an

investment after the reporting periodEntering into major purchase

commitments in the form of issuing guarantees after the reporting period

Classification of assets as held for sale under IFRS 5 and the purchase or disposal of assets after the reporting period

Commencing a lawsuit relating to events that occurred after the reporting period



44

CASE STUDY The statutory audit of ABC Inc. for year ended June

30, 2005, was completed on August 30, 2005. The financial statements were signed by the managing director on September 8, 2005, and approved by the shareholders on October 10, 2005. The next events have occurred.

1) On July 15, 2005, a customer owing $900,000 to ABC Inc. filed for bankruptcy. The financial statements include an allowance for doubtful debts pertaining to this customer only of $50,000.

2) ABC Inc.’s issued capital comprised 100,000 equity shares. The company announced a bonus issue of 25,000 shares on August 1, 2005.

3) Specialized equipment costing $545,000 purchased on March 1, 2005, was destroyed by fire on June 13, 2005. On June 30, 2005, ABC Inc. has booked a receivable of $400,000 from the insurance company pertaining to this claim. After the insurance company completed its investigation, it was discovered that the fire took place due to negligence of the machine operator. As a result, the insurer’s liability was zero on this claim by ABC Inc.

Required• How should ABC Inc. account for these three post–

balance sheet events?

Solution1) ABC Inc. should increase its

allowance for doubtful debts to $900,000 because the customer’s bankruptcy is indicative of a financial condition that existed at the end of the reporting period. This is an “adjusting event.”

2) IAS 33, Earnings Per Share, requires a disclosure of transactions as “stock splits” or “rights issue,” which are of significant importance after the reporting period. This is a nonadjusting event, and only disclosure is needed.

3) This is an adjusting event because it relates to an asset that was recognized at the end of the reporting period. However, as the insurance company’s liability is zero, ABC Inc. must adjust its receivable on the claim to zero.

45


DIVIDENDS PROPOSED OR DECLARED AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

Dividends on equity shares proposed or declared after the reporting period should not be recognized as a liability at the end of the reporting period. Such declaration is a nonadjusting subsequent event and footnote disclosure is required, unless immaterial.

GOING CONCERN CONSIDERATIONSDeterioration in an entity’s financial position

after the reporting period could cast substantial doubts about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. IAS 10 requires that an entity should not prepare its financial statements on a going concern basis if management determines after the reporting period either that it intends to liquidate the entity or cease trading, or that it has no realistic alternative but to do so. IAS 10 notes that disclosures prescribed by IAS 1 under such circumstances should also be complied with.


46

DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTIAS 10 requires these three disclosures:1. The date when the financial statements were

authorized for issue and who gave that authorization. If the entity’s owners have the power to amend the financial statements after issuance, this fact should be disclosed.

2. If information is received after the reporting period about conditions that existed at the end of the reporting period, disclosures that relate to those conditions should be updated in the light of the new information.

3. Where nonadjusting events after the reporting period are of such significance that nondisclosure would affect the ability of the users of financial statements to make proper evaluations and decisions, disclosure should be made for each such significant category of nonadjusting event regarding the nature of the event and an estimate of its financial effect or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made.


RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES

IAS 24

47ADRAC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED 08035487820

CONTENTSObjective Scope of IAS 24Definition of Key TermsScope Exclusion & ExemptionDisclosures


OBJECTIVE OF IAS 24Related-party relationships and

transactions can have an effect on the financial position and operating results of the reporting entity because the transactions may not always be on an arm’s-length basis.

The objective of this standard is to define related-party relationships and transactions and disclose their effects on an entity’s financial position and performance.

It should be noted that this is disclosure standard and does not deal with recognition and measurement issues all of which are dealt with by other relevant standards.


SCOPE OF IAS 24

The requirements of IAS 24 are to be applied ina) Identifying related-party relationships and

transactionsb) Identifying outstanding balances between an

entity and its related partiesc) Identifying the circumstances in which disclosure

of items in (a) and (b) is requiredd) Determining the disclosures that are to be made

about those items The Standard is very clear that its provisions apply

to disclosure of related-party transactions and outstanding balances in the separate financial statements of a parent company, venturer, or investor as, very often, such financial statements may be physically separate from the consolidated financial statements.

Equally, the Standard must be applied to subsidiaries for the same reason. No exemption is given for subsidiaries that are consolidated with their parent. Furthermore, transactions with other entities in a group are to be disclosed in an individual entity’s financial statements, although such intragroup transactions are eliminated on consolidation in the financial statements of the group.

50ADRAC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED

08035487820

SCOPE OF IAS 24In separate financial statements of a

parent company, presented on a “stand-alone” basis as permitted under IAS 27, transactions with its subsidiaries would be disclosed as related-party transactions.

However, in “consolidated financial statements” of the parent company, there will be no related-party transactions or balances reported between members of the consolidated group, as all such items will have been eliminated upon consolidation by applying the procedures outlined in IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements.


DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS

A related party is a person or entity that is related to the entity that is preparing the financial statements (reporting entity).

1. The following illustrates how a person or a close member of that person’s family is related to a reporting entity if that person:

a) Has control or joint control over the reporting entityb) Has significant influence over the reporting entityc) Is a member of the key management personnel of the

reporting entity or the parent of the reporting entity.An entity is related to a reporting entity if any of the

seven following conditions applies :i. The entity and the reporting entity are members of

the same group (which means that the parent, subsidiary and fellow subsidiary is related to the others) 52ADRAC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED

08035487820

DEFINITION OF KEY TERMSii. One entity is an associate or joint venture of the other

entity (or an associate or joint venture of a member of a group of which the other entity is a member)

iii. Both entity are joint ventures of the same third partyiv. One entity is a joint venture of a third party and the

other entity is an associate of the third partyv. The entity is a postemployment benefit plan for the

benefit of employees of either the reporting entity or an entity related to the reporting entity. If the reporting entity is itself such a plan, the sponsoring employers are also related to the reporting entity

vi. The entity is controlled or jointly controlled by a person identified in 1

vii. A person identified in 1 (a) has significant influence over th entity or is a member of the key management personnel of the entity (or of a parent of the entity)


DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS Related-party transaction. A transfer of resources, services,

or obligations between related parties, regardless of whether a price is charged or not.

Close family members of an individual. Those family members who may be expected to influence, or be influenced by, that individual, in their dealings with the entity and include

(a) The individual’s domestic partner and children(b) Children of the individual’s domestic partner(c) Dependents of the individual or the individual’s domestic

partner Compensation. Includes all employee benefits (as described in

IAS 19, Employee Benefits, and IFRS 2, Share-Based Payments). It also includes consideration paid on behalf of a parent of the entity in respect of the entity.

Control. The power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities.

Joint control. The contractually agreed sharing of control. Significant influence. The power to participate in the financial

and operating decisions of an entity, but not control over those policies.

Key management personnel. Those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing, and controlling the activities of an entity, either directly or indirectly, and include directors (executive or otherwise) of that entity.


CASE STUDY P inc. (a parent company) owns a subsidiary S

Corp. Person C is the CEO “key management personnel” of S Corp. Entity Z Ltd. is jointly controlled by Person C.

Required : is S Corp. a related party of Z ltd. For the purposes of the financial statements of Z ltd. ?

Solution : Yes under IAS 24, (revised 2009) S Corp. is a related party of Z Ltd. for the purposes of the financial statements of Z Ltd.

John Smith (father) and John Doe (son) are related parties (“close members of the family”) in accordance with IAS 24. John Smith (father) is in “joint control” of Amazing Inc. John Doe (son) has joint control over a joint venture Good Ltd.

Required : For the purposes of the financial statements of Amazing Inc. and Good Ltd, are related party disclosures required in terms of IAS 24 ?


CASE STUDY

Solution : 1. For the purposes of the financial

statements of Amazing Inc : Good Ltd., the entity joint controlled by John Doe( son) is a related party and therefore related party transactions between them would attract disclosure requirements of IAS 24.

2. For the purposes of the financial statements of Good Ltd: Amazing Inc:, the entity joint controlled by John Smith(father) is a related party and therefore related party transactions between them would attract disclosure requirements of IAS 24.


CASE STUDY Interesting Inc. is a manufacturer of

automobile spare parts. It transacts business through a business model that has worked for several years and has made the entity a successful enterprise that is rated in the top 10 businesses in its field by a trade journal. Interesting Inc. believes in working with reliable and dependable vendors and also sells only to entities that it can either control or exercise significant influence over. The business model works in this way:

(a) Interesting Inc. purchases everything it needs from Excellent Inc., a well-known supplier. Due to the high quality of the material that Excellent Inc. has provided over the last 10 years, Interesting Inc. has never purchased from any other supplier. Thus it may be considered economically dependent on Excellent Inc.

(b)Interesting Inc. sells 70% of its output to a company owned by a director and the balance to an entity that is its “associate” by virtue of Interesting Inc. owning 35% of the share capital of that company.

(c) Interesting Inc. stores inventory in a warehouse that is leased from the wife of its director. The lease rentals are at arm’s length.

(d) Interesting Inc. has provided an interest-free loan to a company owned by the chief executive officer (CEO) of Interesting Inc. for the purposes of financing the purchase of delivery vans which the company owned by the CEO is using for transporting goods from the warehouse of the supplier to the warehouse used by Interesting Inc. for storing inventory.

Required• Based on the requirements of IAS

24, identify which transactions would need to be disclosed as related party transactions under IAS 24.ADRAC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED

08035487820 57

CASE STUDY

Solution• Let us examine each of the

transactions in order to determine whether they would warrant disclosure as related party transaction under IAS 24.

(a) Notwithstanding the fact that Interesting Inc. purchases all its raw materials from Excellent Inc. and is economically dependent on it, Excellent Inc. does not automatically become a related party. Thus for the purpose of IAS 24, purchases made from Excellent Inc. are not considered related party transactions.

(b) Seventy percent of the sales are to an entity owned by a “director” (i.e., an entity controlled by a key management person), and 30% of the sales are made to an entity that Interesting Inc. has “significant influence” over. Thus both sales are to related parties as defined in IAS 24 and would need to be disclosed as such.

(c) The lease of the warehouse, although at arm’s length, has been entered into with the wife (a “close member of the family”) of a “director” (a key management person) and thus needs to be disclosed as a related party transaction.

(d) The interest-free loan to an entity owned by a director needs to be disclosed as a related party transaction. The fact that it is interest-free may warrant disclosure because it may not be construed as an “arm’s-length transaction” since Interesting Inc. would not normally provide unrelated parties with interest-free loans.

NOTE: IAS 24, requires that “disclosures that related party transactions were made on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions are made only if such terms can be substantiated.” Furthermore, the rental expenses paid for hiring a delivery van belonging to an entity owned by a director also would need to be disclosed as a related party transaction since these charges are paid to an entity “controlled” by a key management person.


58

SCOPE EXCLUSIONS & EXEMPTION Although apparently some parties, by virtue of their

relationship with the entity, may appear as related parties falling within the scope of IAS 24, the Standard clarifies that the following parties are not necessarily related parties as envisaged in the Standard:

Providers of finance, trade unions, public utilities, and government departments and agencies are not necessarily related parties simply by virtue of their normal dealings with an entity, even if they participate in decision-making processes or affect freedom of action.

Customers, suppliers, franchisors, distributors, or general agents are not related to an entity solely because the entity is economically dependent on them.

Two entities are not related parties simply because they have common directors or other members of key management personnel in common.

Two venturers are not related parties simply because they share joint control over a joint venture.


DISCLOSURES In order to enable users of financial statements to better

understand the financial position of an entity and to form a view about the effects of related-party transactions on an entity, IAS 24 has mandated extensive disclosure requirements with respect to related-party transactions.

IAS 24 provides examples of general disclosures of transactions with related parties :

Purchase or sales of goods and property or other assets Rendering or receiving of services Leases Transfers of research and developments, transfers under

license agreements and finance agreements Provision of guarantees or collateral Providing commitments to do something if a particular event

occurs or does not occur Settlement of liabilities by a related party on behalf of the

entity or by the entity on behalf of the related party. 60ADRAC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED 08035487820

DISCLOSURES According to IAS 24, an entity should disclose : Relationships between parents and subsidiaries

regardless of whether there have been any transactions between them

The name of the entity’s parent and, if different, the ultimate controlling party. If neither the entity’s parent nor the ultimate controlling party produces financial statements available for public use, the name of the next most senior parent that does so shall also be disclosed.

According to IAS 24, an entity should disclose “key management personnel” compensation in total and for each of these categories:

Short-term employee benefits Postemployment benefits Other long-term benefits Termination benefits Share-based payments


DISCLOSURES IAS 24, states that if there have been transactions

between related parties, an entity should disclose the nature of the related-party relationship as well as information about the transactions and outstanding balances necessary for an understanding of potential effect of the relationship on the financial statements. At a minimum, disclosures shall include :

The amount of the transactions The amount of outstanding balances

Their terms and conditions Whether they are secured or unsecured The nature of the settlement consideration Details of guarantees given or received

Provisions for doubtful debts against balances outstanding

Provisions for doubtful debts recognized as an expense


DISCLOSURESAccording to IAS 24, these disclosures are required to be

disclosed separately for each of these categories of related party:

ParentEntities with joint control or significant influence over the

entitySubsidiariesAssociates Joint ventures in which the entity is a venturerKey management personnel of the entity or its parentOther related parties IAS 24, states that items of a similar nature may be

disclosed in aggregate except when separate disclosure is necessary for an understanding of the effects of related-party transactions on the financial statements of the entity. 63ADRAC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED

08035487820

CASE STUDY

• Zeeba Inc. is part of a major industrial group of companies and is known to accurately disclose related party transactions in its financial statements prepared under IFRS. With the sweeping changes that were made to the various standards under the IASB’s improvement Project, the entity is seeking advise from IFRS specialists on whether the following transactions need to be reported under IAS 24 and, if so, to what extent, and how the related party transactions footnote should be worded.

1. Remuneration and other payment made to the entity’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) during year 20XX were :

a. An annual salary of $2millionb. Share options and other share

based payments valued at $1millionc. Contributions to retirement benefit

plan amounting to $1milliond. Reimbursement of his travel

expenses for business trips totalling $1.2million

2. Sales made during the year 20XX to :a. Meifa Inc. Parent Company

$35million b. Deifa Inc Associate : $25million

3. Trade Receivables at 31st December 20XX include a. Due from Meifa Inc. Gross

$10million, net of provision $7million

b. Due from Deifa Inc. $15million (these receivables are fully backed by corporate guarantees from Deifa Inc.)

Required : Advise Zeeba Inc. on related

party transactions that need to be disclosed and draft a sample related-party transactions footnote to guide the entity.ADRAC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED

08035487820 64

CASE STUDYSolution1. All the listed items are required to

be disclosed in Zeeba Inc.’s financial statements prepared under IFRS. The only exception is the reimbursement of the travel expenses of the CEO amounting to $1.2million , as this sum was not “compensation,” it is not required to be disclosed under IAS 24.

2. Footnote : Related –Party Transactions

a. Zeeba Inc enters into related-party transactions in the normal course of business. During the year 20XX , these related-party transactions were entered into with related parties as defined under IAS 24. The transactions resulted in balances due from those two parties that, at December 31, 20XX were :

1) With the Parent company (Meifa Inc.)Sales

$35millionIncluded in trade receivables (due from parent company)

$10millionProvision for doubtful debts $3million

2) With an Associate Sale $25million

Included in trade receivables(due from an associate)

$15million Amount due from the associate is secured by

a corporate guarantee given by the Parent b. For the year ended December 31, 20XX,

Zeeba Inc. made these payments to its CEO part of the “key management personnel”

Short term benefits (salary) $2million

Post employment benefits (retirement benefit plan contribution)

$1millionShare based payment (stock options)

$1million Total

$4million


65

Date post:	21-Nov-2014
Category:	Education
Upload:	stephen-njoku
View:	49 times
Download:	1 times

Presentation of financial stmt ias 1, 10, 24,

Education