Date post: | 12-Apr-2017 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | dhaval-prajapati |
View: | 193 times |
Download: | 2 times |
EMPLOYER BRANDING FOR KNOWLEDGE WORKER RETENTION
Prepared By:Dhaval [email protected] [email protected]
PARUL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Faculty GuideProf. Alpa Parmar
TABLE OF CONTENTSr.no Particulars
1 Introduction
2 Significance of study
3 Objective
4 Hypotheses
5 Research Design
6 Sample Technique
7 Model
8 Finding
9 Suggestion
Introduction
Significance Of Study• It is to enhance attraction increases retention and greater
engagement with the staff that can only be done by good hr branding.
• Employer branding provides an effective bridge between hr, internal communication and marketing, recruitment, retaining and developing right people is important aspect of internal branding.
• The way to attract and retain skilled and able employer who prefer to their but of their abilities is through proper approaches for the study of role of hr in employer branding is must.
Objectives
Primary objective:• To find out the dimensions of employer branding of
organizations.
Secondary objective:• To find out the relationship between employer branding
and retention strategies of employees of the organizations.
• To find out the relationship between employer branding and motivation of employees of the organizations.
HYPOTHESES– H01: There will be no significant relationship between perceived
organizational prestige and employer branding.– H02: There will be no significant relationship between transparency and
leadership and employer branding.– H03: There will be no significant relationship between employer branding
and organization fit.– H04: There will be no significant relationship between employer branding
and individual motivation factor.– H05: There will be no significant relationship between employer branding
and organizational motivation factors. – H06: There will be no significant relationship between employer branding
and comparative evaluation.– H07: There will be no significant relationship between employer branding
and customer perspective as perceived by employees.– H08: There will be no significant relationship between perceptions outside
the organization.
RESEARCH DESIGN:
Universe:• Total number of employees selected from selected manufacturing industries.Sample size :• The sample size taken for the study is 67 employees (top and middle level)
from selected organization. Sampling Technique: convenient sampling as well as random sampling.Tools of data collectionPrimary dataStructured QuestionnaireThe questionnaire will be closed depending upon the nature of the research.Secondary dataresearch papersArticlesmagazine
Types OF RESEARCHDescriptive research• Descriptive studies are concerned with describing and
characteristics of particular such as role of hr in employee retention and employer branding for employee attraction and retention in selected manufacturing sector.
Explorative research• Explorative research type of research conducted for problem that
has not been clearly defined. It helps determine the best research design , data collection method and selection of subjects. It should draw definitive conclusions. Thus this study utilize explorative design to study the role of employer branding retention.
SAMPLE TECHNIQUE
Data Treatment- Data analysis will be done through coding, editing, tabulation and
interpretation through SPSS and MS EXCEL.
Limitations:1. Sample size: the present study is carried out for academic purpose, so
sample size is restricted as the organization selection for data collection.2. No generalization: the study restricted to an organization under study so
it can be generalized for all employees in other organization.3. Employer branding is a complex problem and researcher has attempted
to study most appropriate factors but chances cannot be ruled out that some areas may have been untouched or not adequately touched
Data Analysis & Interpretation
Employer Branding Management Of Organization
Employer Branding
Pearson Correlation 1 .754**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
Management Of Organization
Pearson Correlation .754** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
CORRELATION BETWEEN EMPLOYER BRANDING AND MANAGEMENT OF ORGANIZATION
Employer Branding Perceived Organizational
Prestige
Employer Branding
Pearson Correlation 1 .569**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
Perceived Organizational Prestige
Pearson Correlation .569** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
CORRELATION BETWEEN EMPLOYER BRANDING AND PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL PRESTIGE
Employer Branding Transperancy And
Leadership
Employer Branding
Pearson Correlation 1 .746**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
Transparency And Leadership
Pearson Correlation .746** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
CORRELATION BETWEEN EMPLOYER BRANDING AND TRANSPERANCY AND LEADERSHIP
Employer Branding Organization Fit
Employer Branding
Pearson Correlation 1 .626**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
Organization Fit
Pearson Correlation .626** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
CORRELATION BETWEEN EMPLOYER BRANDING AND ORGANIZATION FIT
Employer Branding Individual Motivation
Employer Branding
Pearson Correlation 1 .572**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
Individual Motivation
Pearson Correlation .572** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
CORRELATION BETWEEN EMPLOYER BRANDING AND INDIVIDUAL MOTIVATION FACTORS
Employer Branding Organizational Motivation
Employer Branding
Pearson Correlation 1 .422**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
Organizational Motivation
Pearson Correlation .422** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
CORRELATION BETWEEN EMPLOYER BRANDING AND ORGANIZATIONAL MOTIVATION FACTORS
Employer Branding Comparative Evalution
Employer Branding
Pearson Correlation 1 .774**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
Comparative Evaluation
Pearson Correlation .774** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
CORRELATION BETWEEN EMPLOYER BRANDING AND COMPERATIVE EVALUTION
Employer Branding Customer Perspective As
Perceived By Employees
Employer Branding
Pearson Correlation 1 .524**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
Customer Persepctive As Perceived By
Employees
Pearson Correlation .524** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 67 67
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
CORRELATION BETWEEN EMPLOYER BRANDING AND CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE AS PRCEIVED BY EMPLOYEES
Employer Branding Perception Outside Organization
Employer Branding
Pearson Correlation 1 .045
Sig. (2-tailed) .720
N 67 67
Perception Outside Organization
Pearson Correlation .045 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .720
N 67 67
CORRELATION BETWEEN EMPLOYER BRANDING AND PERCEPTION OUTSIDE ORGANIZATION
CONCLUSION
SUGGESTION• HR department should be more flexible for motivates employees to communicate their
ideas to management for improvement.• HR department conducts more various attractive activities to reduce stress for enhancing
their mental abilities.• Company should make more strong channels for recruitment brochures or web site by
which different important information gathered easily.• Every employee in organization receives training that enhances his/her ability to deliver
high quality service.• Organization should develop such tools like job rotation for making job interesting and
challenging. • Management should know the talents of their employees and utilized them regularly • Managers should be trained to select, identify, guide, coach, reward and retain their people • Managers should hold regular meetings with their work groups and those meetings should
keep them informed, give them information and enable them to do a better job .• Promotion should be goes to the deserve candidate not to the senior one .• Organization should provide opportunity for career growth of the employees by coaching,
and by helping employees to achieve their personal goals, by providing adequate training... Encouragement of staff development, and opportunities for growth."
MODEL