Presentation on New HEC Ranking Criteria

Presentation on New HEC Ranking Criteria

SCHEME OF PRESENTATION

• Parameters of old & new Ranking Criteria

• Comparative Study - HEC Ranking Criteria Old & New

• Current BU Status

• Recommendations

OLD & NEW PARAMETERS OF RANKINGS

S.NoOld Ranking Criteria

(2010)Score S.No

New Ranking Criteria (2012)

Score

1Implementation of QA Criteria

18 1Quality Assurance & Enhancement

20

2 Teaching Quality 42 2 Teaching Quality 35

3 Research 40 3 Research 35

4 Employer Perception 5

5 Peer Perception 5

Total Score 100 Total Score 100

COMPARATIVE STUDY - HEC RANKING CRITERIA NEW & OLD 1. QA Criteria / Sub parameters

S# Old Ranking Criteria (2010)MAX

PointsNew Ranking Criteria

(2012)MAX

Points System for Assessment & Marking 1

Implementation of QA Criteria

18Quality Assurance & Enhancement

20

a Plagiarism policy implementation 6 aPlagiarism policy implementation

6

Based on evidence on various stages ofimplementation :1. Constitution of Plagiarism standingcommittee (PSC)2. Notifications/Minutes ofSyndicate/BOG/Statutory bodymeetings.3. Functioning of the committee (PSC) by resolving the plagiarism cases.

bEligibility Criteria for appointments of faculty members

4 bEligibility Criteria for appointments offaculty members

4

Based on adherence HEC criteria appointments of faculty members :1. Notifications/Minutes ofSyndicate/BOG/Statutory bodymeetings for implementation of criteria by university.

cCriteria for M.Phil./MS & Ph.D. Programmes

4 cCompliance of M.Phil./MS & Ph.D. criteria

4

Based on compliance of HEC criteria :1. Notifications/Minutes ofSyndicate/BOG/Statutory bodymeetings for implementation of criteria by university.

dQuality Enhancement Cell Categorization

4 dQuality Enhancement Cell Categorization

6As per scorecard developed and shared with Universities by QAA of HEC.



PointsNew Ranking Criteria (2012)

MAX Points System for Assessment & Marking

2 Teaching Quality 42 Teaching Quality 35

a Student Teacher Ratio 12 aStudent Teacher Ratio

7Total regular faculty and FTE (Full Time Equivalent) faculty will be considered for calculating overall Student Teacher Ratio.

bRatio of PhD faculty to total faculty

9 bRatio of PhD faculty to total faculty 6

It is the PhD faculty divided by total faculty. For medical FRCS, FCP etc. will be treated as terminal degrees.

c Selectivity 5 c Selectivity 5It is the ratio of the total applicants seeking admission in the university and students actually selected.

dComputers (Number of computers provided to students by university)

4 d Computers 4The total number of computers available to students and faculty of university.

e Library books 4 e Library books 4Total number of books at campus libraryexcluding electronic books.

f Full Time PhD faculty 3 N/A N/A

g Total PhD output for 2010 5N/A N/A

N/A N/A

fRatio of Full time faculty to part time

3It is the ratio of full time faculty to part time faculty. Full time faculty is regular and contractual faculty whereas part time faculty is the visiting faculty.

N/A N/Ag Teacher Evaluation 3

Mechanism of teacher evaluation established within the framework of QEC or universities’ own conducted faculty evaluation survey .

N/A N/Ah Training of faculty 3

As per HEC record and data provided by universities on ranking proforma will be used for this component.Other faculty training information (National as well as international) as per evidence provided by universities will be considered.


2. Teaching Quality/Sub-Parameters

3.Research/Sub-Parameters

S.NoOld Ranking

Criteria (2010)MAX Points

New Ranking Criteria (2012)

MAX PointsMAX Points

System for Assessment & Marking

3 Research 40 3 Research 35

iHEC Approved supervisors

5 iApproved supervisors

5

HEC Approved supervisors are thosewho can enroll HEC scholars. Whereas HEC registered supervisors are those who can only supervise scholars which are not funded by HEC.

iiIndigenous scholarship

4 iiIndigenous scholarship

4Total number of HEC indigenous scholars enrolled in university as per records of HEC scholarship section.

iiiResearch grants approved

2 iiiResearch grants approved other than HEC

2

As per the record of HEC R&D Division the number of research grants approved by the HEC will be used. Documentary evidence viz. MOUs etc. will be required for those research grants received by the university other than the HEC.Last 3 years data will be considered.

ivTravel Grants approved

2 ivTravel Grants approved

2

As per the record of HEC R&D Division,number of travel grants received by thefaculty members of the universities will be used. Documentary evidence will be required for those travel grants received by the university faculty other than the HEC sources.Last 3 years data will be considered.

S.NoOld Ranking Criteria

(2010)MAX Points

S.No New Ranking Criteria (2012)MAX Points

System for Assessment & Marking

vPublications in Impact Factor Journals

5 vPublications in Impact Factor Journals

4

ISI web of knowledge will be benchmark and(research output extracted by HECDigital Library will be used. Details of Research Publications of Universities by HEC as flashed

viNumber of papers published by theuniversity

3 viNumber of papers published by the university

3

viiCitations

4 vii Citations 3

viiiUniversity H Index

4 viii University H Index 2

ix

Number of W, X, Y , Z Journals Published bythe University

5 ixNumber of W, X, Y , Z Journals Published by the University

3

As per Quality Assurance Division’s record,,number of HEC recognized journals publishedby the university in W, X, Y, Z category will beused.

x Internet Bandwidth (PERN) utilization

4 x Internet Bandwidth (PERN) utilization

3

Average utilization of Internet bandwidth bythe universities acquired through PERN andother ISPs will be used. Documentary proofMRTG (Multi Router Traffic Grapher), PRTG (Paessier Router Traffic Grapher) etc. of Internet bandwidth utilization will be required of other ISPs.

xiNumber of Conferences Organized

2 xiNumber of Conferences Organized

2

As per the record of R&D Division, HEC thenumber of seminars, conferences, workshops& symposia organized by university through HEC funding will be used.In addition conferences etc. organized byuniversities through national/internationalcollaboration from sources other than HECfunding will also be accounted, for whichdocumentary evidence will be required.Last 3 years data will be considered.

- - xii Total PhD output for 2011 2Data provided by universities throughranking proforma and records of PhDCountry Directory data will be used.



PointsNew Ranking Criteria (2012)

MAX Points System for Assessment & Marking

3 Employer Perception Survey 3Employer

Perception Survey 5

N/A N/AEmployer Perception Survey

All Universities have been requested toProvide the 05 top recruitersinformation in the relevant field.Employer perception survey will be finalized based on responses received from potential employers of university graduates.

4 Peer Perception 4 Peer Perception 5

N/A NilPeer Perception

Each university has been given opportunity to consider academic standing of other universities among peers and rank them as1,2,3, …. to 10, accordingly. Each university has to rate other one falling in the same category, excluding itself. Universities in ‘General Category’ will be providing peer perception according to respective size of distributed on enrollment basis, given below:Large>=7000Medium>=3000 & <7000Small <3000The relevant list has been provided by HEC to each university.

Total Score Nil Total Score 10

04. New Parameters added

Note: Relative method of scoring or grading will be used among 18 General Large Universities

STATUS OF BU AMONG GENERAL UNIVERSITY (LARGE) OLD RANKING 2010

S.No

Institute NameTeaching

Quality (42)QA Criteria

(18)Research

(40)Total Score

(100)1 University of Punjab, Lahore 15.89 17 12.18 452 University of Karachi 15.11 10 10.67 363 Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 12.08 12 9.76 344 University of Peshawar 12.06 10 10.43 32

5Intemational Islamic University, Islamabad

9.12 15 6.83 32

6 Govt College University, Faisalabad 8.06 18 2.95 29

7Federal Urdu University,Arts, Science & Technolgy

8.84 17 2.84 29

8 University of Sargodha 8.35 13 4.61 269 University of Sindh, Jamshoro 8.30 11 5.74 25

10 The Islamia University, Bahawalpur 9.33 10 5.69 2511 Hazara University, Mansehra 8.63 13 3.16 2512 Bahria University 6.35 15 2.18 2413 University of Education, Lahore 4.94 15 2.70 23

14National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad

5.69 14 2.54 22

15 University of Gujrat 5.97 14 1.58 2216 Preston University, Kohat 7.05 7 0.37 1417 University of Lahore 6.31 5 0.72 12

BU STATUS Old V/S New

S.No Status (2010)Points

scored out Status (2012)Max

Points

1Implementation of QA Criteria

18Quality Assurance & Enhancement

20

1Plagiarism Standing Committee

3Out of 6

Plagiarism policy implementation

2 Appointment Criteria 4Out of 4

Eligibility Criteria for appointments offaculty members

3Criteria for MS/Mphil & Phd

4Out of 4

Compliance of M.Phil./MS & Ph.D. criteria

4 QEC Categorization 4Out of 4

Quality Enhancement Cell Categorization

Total 15Out of 18


S.No Status (2010)Ratio /

NosStatus (2012)

Ratio/ Nos

Teaching Quality (6.35 out of 42) Teaching Quality (35)

1 Student Teacher Ratio (8308:593) 14:1 Student Teacher Ratio (9867:813) 12:1

2Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty 40:1007

1:25Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty(76:737)

1:9

3Selectivity (No of applicants against available seats) 8500:2500

3:1Selectivity (No of applicants against available seats) 12000:3000

4:1

4Computers (No of computers for the students provided by university)

642Computers (No of computers for the students and faculty provided by university)

1027

5 Library books 50,000 Library books 55,001

6 Full Time PhD faculty 41 Full Time PhD faculty 40

7 Full Time faculty 406 Full Time faculty 392

8 Part Time Faculty 560 Part Time Faculty 345

9 Full Time Equivalent Faculty 593 Not Asked

10 Total PhD output for 2010 0 Not Asked

11 Not Asked -Ratio of Full time faculty to part time (392:345)

1:1

12 Not Asked - Teacher Evaluation

13 Not Asked Training of faculty 226


S.No Status (2010) Nos Status (2012) Nos

i HEC Approved supervisors 7 Approved supervisors 15

ii Indigenous scholarship 6 Indigenous scholarship 16

iii Research grants approved 4Research grants approved other than HEC

24

iv Travel Grants approved 10 Travel Grants approved 13


S.No Status (2010) Nos Status (2012) Nos

vPublications in Impact Factor Journals - Publications in Impact Factor

Journals14 (July 11-June12)

viNumber of papers published by theuniversity

10Number of papers published by the university

25

viiCitations

3 Citations 7

viii University H Index 2 University H Index -

ixNumber of W, X, Y , Z Journals Published bythe University

0Number of W, X, Y , Z Journals Published by the University -

xInternet Bandwidth (PERN) utilization

18 Mbs

out of 48

Mbs

Internet Bandwidth (PERN) utilization

• 28.64% Utilization in Islamabad Campus• 25.91% Utilization in Karachi Campus

xiNumber of Conferences Organized

0Number of Conferences Organized

28

Total PhD output for 2011 0


S.No Status (2010)Max

Points Status (2012)Max

Points

Employer Perception Survey Employer Perception Survey

1 Not Asked Employer Perception Survey

Peer Perception Peer Perception

2 Not AskedPeer Perception

COMPARATIVE STUDY – QA CRITERIA GENERAL UNIVERSITIES (LARGE)

S.No Institute NameAppointment Criteria

Criteria for MS/Mphil & Phd

QEC Categorization Plagiarism Standing

CommitteeTotal

2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010

1Govt. College University, Faisalabad.

4 4 4 6 18

2Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science & Technology.

4 4 3 6 17

3University of The Punjab, Lahore

4 4 3 6 17

4Bahria University, Islamabad

4 4 4 3 15

5International Islamic University.

4 4 4 3 15

6University of Education, Lahore.

4 4 1 6 15

7National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad.

4 4 3 3 14

8 University of Gujrat. 4 4 3 3 14

9Hazara University Mansehra, KPK.

4 4 2 3 13

10 University of Sargodha. 4 4 2 3 13

11Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan.

0 4 2 6 12

12 University of Sindh. 4 4 3 0 11

13The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

4 4 2 0 10

14 University of Karachi. 4 0 3 3 10

15 University of Peshawar. 0 4 3 3 10

16 Preston University, Kohat 4 0 0 3 7

17 University of Lahore, Lahore 0 0 2 3 5

18National University of Science & Technlogy (NUST)

4 4 4 4 18

COMPARATIVE STUDY - TEACHING QUALITY GENERAL UNIVERSITIES (LARGE)

S.NoInstitute

Name

Student / Teacher Ratio

Computers Applicants Library PhD Output Graduate/

Postgraduate students

Undergraduate Students

FT PhD Faculty

FT Faculty PT Faculty FTE

Faculty

2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010

1 BZU 17:1 3,500

35,000

304,573 15

7,256

7,594 175 523

960

843

2Bahria University

14:1 18:1 642 1027 8,476 11,539 50,000 55,001 0 1 2,054 2933 6,254 6934 41 40 406 392 560 345 593

3 FUUAST 14:1 474

2,418

127,973 0 4,509

5,163 114 432

655

650

4GCU, Faisalabad

16:1 800

16,942

19,500

1

3,530

8,603 117 592

426

734

5Hazara UniversityMansehra

19:1 950 11,000

107,000 0 1,175

7,090 79 405

81

432

6 IIUI 23:1 3,478

16,642

119,560 16

8,333

11,323 156 585

777

844

7 IUB 21:1 2,100

22,602

225,000 35

7,974

6,654 115 533

487

695

8 KU 23:1 5,500

30,000

366,441 125

12,042

15,162 342 739

1,276

1,164

9 NUML 26:1 600

6,156

115,000 24

9,741

4,146 49 513

29

523

10 NUST 17:1 6,519 46,832 342,896 10 890 7,337 303 912 116 951

11 PU 25:1 6,500

140,054

1,223,600 108

13,715

16,893 367 1,006

614

1,211

12Preston University, Kohat

27:1 2,630

4,693

51,472 0 4,689

7,434 65 363

246

445

13 UOE, LHR 47:1 893

30,000

169,964

5

8,213

5,051 29 247

104

282

14UOS, Sargodha

25:1 1,500

18,263

78,721

3

6,521

8,244 132 559

55

577

15UOP, Peshawar

22:1 1,350

20,000

191,197

7

5,938

5,706 179 419

267

508

16UOS, Sindh

33:1 1,458

15,372

382,201 15

3,628

16,039 133 570

67

592

17University of Gujrat

20:1 800

15,942

25,141 0 2,668

7,001 38 458

18

464

18University of Lahore

16:1 1,680

11,693

25,409 0 2,679

11,290 44 770

163

824

COMPARATIVE STUDY - RESEARCH GENERAL UNIVERSITIES (LARGE)

S.No

Institute Name

Conferences PERN H-INDEX CitationsResearch

PapersHEC Aprvd Suprvsrs

HEC Travel Grants

Indigenous Scholars

Research Grants

W Category X Category Y Category Z Category

2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012

1 BZU 3 25 16 141 143 96 19 280 21 2 1

2Bahria University 28 18 25 2 - 3 7 10 25 7 15 10 13 6 24 4 1

3 FUUAST 2 9 5 35 61 11 12 27 17

4GCU, Faisalabad 6 9 88 73 46 7 14 22 2

5Hazara UniversityMansehra

2 4 6 63 58 33 6 19 3

6 IIUI 3 33 7 61 57 55 69 172 14 1 3

7 IUB 2 14 9 99 88 36 41 155 8 1

8 KU 2 25 305 392 80 53 122 135 3 4 6

9 NUML 7 1 3 4 18 6 62 0 3

10 NUST 4 42 19 273 155 170 44 103 80

11 PU 3 40 20 487 356 182 48 441 53 1 3 9 8

12Preston University, Kohat

1 3 9 7 0

13 UOE, LHR 1 3 4 11 9 7 4 25 2 1

14UOS, Sargodha 9 13 228 193 48 17 35 14

15UOP, Peshawar 8 27 14 247 153 73 32 171 26 4 5

16UOS, Sindh 3 20 21 179 95 15 36 12 18 1 6

17University of Gujrat 18 1 6 20 20 8 1

18University of Lahore 5 3 6 13 2 1 0

RECOMMENDATIONS

• There must be some benchmark to measure performance. Despite

weaknesses and flaws in the assessment, HEC benchmark be followed in letter & spirit.

• Any suggestion on proposed New Criteria of Ranking be forwarded to QA Dte for onward submission to HEC for consideration / review.

• Number of HEC enrolled indigenous scholars be increased• Number of Research Grants from HEC & from other sources like:

USAID, JICA, Corporate sector & NGOs etc be increased.• Number of travel grants from HEC & other services be increased• More utilization of PERN• Organizing Conferences, National & International with the funding

from HEC or atleast HEC may be intimated

Thank You

No. InstituteTeaching Quality

QA Criteria Research Total Score

1 Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 23.88 11 32.46 67

2 Government College University, Lahore 14.65 13 11.95 40

3 Gomal University, D.I Khan 10.64 17 4.71 32

4Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat

9.54 15 4.07 29

5 Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur 9.18 14 4.39 28

6The University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, AJ&K

9.72 15 3.58 28

7Riphah International University, Islamabad

9.74 15 2.67 27

8Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi

8.22 15 2.71 26

9 University of Balochisan, Quetta 9.44 13 3.73 26

10University of Management & Technology, Lahore

7.49 13 4.81 25

11 Forman Christian College, Lahore 14.45 7 1.92 23

12Mohammad Ali Jinnah University, Karachi

7.53 3 6.7 17

13 Hamdard University, Karachi 6.82 7 2.12 16

14 Jinnah University for Women, Karachi 7.39 7 0.69 15

15 University of Central Punjab, Lahore 5.68 8 1.47 15

GENERAL UNIVERSITIES MEDIUM


QA Criteria

ResearchTotal Score

1 Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad 23.43 6 7.72 372 University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad 16.14 15 0.78 323 Sardar Bahadur Khan Women's University, Quetta 12.13 15 2.39 304 National Defence University, Islamabad 12.23 11 3.96 275 Karakurum International University, Gilgit 11.23 12 1.77 256 Textile Institute of Pakistan, Karachi 14.16 11 0 257 University of Malakand, Dir, Malakand 7.29 13 3.33 248 Foundation University, Islamabad 11.96 7 3.3 22

9

Beaconhouse National University, Lahore 7.59 13 0.4 21Dadabhoy Institute of Higher Education, Karachi 6.05 15 0 21Frontier Women University, Peshawar 4.86 15 1.46 21Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar 10.05 11 0.26 21University of South Asia, Lahore 7.7 11 1.9 21

10 GIFT University, Gujranwala 8.52 11 0 20

11Indus Institute of Higher Education, Karachi 8.59 10 0 19Mohiuddin Islamic University, AJ&K 7.7 11 0.01 19

12 Hajvery University, Lahore 6.73 11 0 1813 Kinnaird College For Women, Lahore 8.19 9 0.48 1814 The Superior College, Lahore 10.91 7 0.06 18

15Karachi Institute of Economics & Technology, Karachi 9.93 7 0.56 17Newport Institute of Communications & Economics, Karachi 5.89 11 0.25 17

16 Greenwich University, Karachi 8.31 7 0.25 1617 Minhaj University, Lahore 11.03 3 0 1418 Preston Institute of Management, Science and Technology, Karachi 7.76 3 0 1119 Preston University, Karachi 7.3 0 1.01 8

GENERAL UNIVERSITIES SMALL


QA Criteria ResearchTotal Score

1Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Islamabad

36.51 17 28.27 81.79

2National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad

25.83 18 18.22 62.05

3Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences & Technology, Topi

24.37 9 22.67 56.03

4 University of Engineering and Technology- Lahore 16.15 12 11.65 39.79

5 University of Engineering and Technology-Taxila 16.82 10 12.23 39.05

6 Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 14.72 14 9.92 38.64

7 KPK University of Engineering and Technology 12.48 12 6.05 30.53

8Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro

12.11 12 5.59 29.7

9NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi

10.66 13 4.5 28.16

10 Air University, Islamabad 13.77 10 4.27 28.04

11 National Textile University, Faisalabad 9.68 8 8.44 26.12

12Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science & Technology, Nawabshah

7.97 14 1.54 23.51

13Balochistan University of Engg & Technology, Khuzdar

8.37 13 1.52 22.89

14Sir Syed University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi

7.59 14 0.86 22.45

15 Mirpur University of Science & Technology, AJ&K 6.78 13 2.18 21.96

16Dawood College of Engineering & Technology, Karachi

5.78 14 0 19.78

ENGINEERING


QA Criteria

ResearchTotal Score

1Lahore University of Management Sciences, Lahore 30.38 14 24.83 69

2 Institute of Business Administration Karachi 17.09 15 8.42 41

3 Iqra University,Karachi 20.09 14 5.96 40

4Sukkar, Institute of Business Administration, Sukkar 17.32 15 7.31 40

5National College of Business Administration & Economics, Lahore 22.11 1 14.59 38

6Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science & Technology, Karachi 11.51 11 8.94 31

7Institute of Management Sciences,Peshawar 9.14 14 8.3 31

8 Lahore School of Economics, Lahore 13.48 11 4.61 29

9Imperial College of Business Studies, Lahore 20.11 7 0 27

10 Institute of Management Sciences, Lahore 10.6 11 2.47 24

11 Institute of Business Management, Karachi 10.29 10 1.74 22

12Institute of Business and Technology, Karachi 17.8 2 0.25 20

13 KASB Institute of Technology, Karachi 11.66 7 0.35 19

Business Education


(42)

QA Criteria

(18)

Research(40)

Total Score

Position

1COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Islamabad

28.67 15 24.77 68 1

2National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (NU-FAST), Islamabad

33.06 9 18.85 61 2

3Qurtaba University of Science and Information Technology, D I Khan

26.72 11 5.55 43 3

4Balochistan University of Information Technology and Management Sciences, Quetta

16.79 14 6.04 37 4

5City University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar

16.1 11 0.91 28 5

6CECOS University of Information Technology and Emerging Sciences, Peshawar

14.61 11 0 26 6

Computer Sciences & IT Category

Date post:	31-Jan-2016
Category:	Documents
Upload:	moriah
View:	28 times
Download:	0 times

Presentation on New HEC Ranking Criteria

Documents