Leadership Excellence This We’ll Defend
Leaders for Life
Presentation to
Association of Military Colleges and Schools in the United States
BG Sean Gainey 22 February 2016
2
Purpose/ Agenda Purpose: Provide an update on Cadet Command focus areas and quality initiatives within the framework of the USACC Strategic Plan
Agenda: Ø USACC FY16 Strategic Plan
Ø LOE 2: Develop SROTC Cadets to meet the demands of the AOC/ HD 2025 § Cadet Character Leader Development Strategy (CCLDS) § Cadet Summer Training 2016 Preparation
Ø LOE 3: Precisely Recruit to Shape the Cohort ICW Army Requirement § Cadet Quality and Diversity Initiatives
Ø LOE 5: Optimize Organizational Agility § Implement Task Force Concept § BN HQ Concept
Ø LOE 4: Lead the JROTC Program
3
Win in a Complex World Develop Cadre, Staff and Faculty who model the Army profession and inspire Cadets to learn and
grow as leaders.
Develop Cadets who meet SROTC Outcomes and Army requirements for newly commissioned 2LTs in
2025.
Provide communities a quality citizenship program for their high
school students focused on character, leadership and service to the Nation for the 21st Century.
Recruit Cadets who possess the cognitive, physical and emotional
faculties, traits and attributes necessary to commission and
excel as an Army 2LT.
Functionally organize and resource the command to meet goals for recruiting and leader
development.
CCLDS
8 X ROTC Brigades
Cadre Faculty
Staff
USACC Strategic Goals
Quality
Diversity
Organization Agility
Imperatives
Ena
blin
g A
ctiv
ities
(H
R, L
OG
, RM
, IT/
IM a
nd F
M/F
D)
Capabilities
Develop SROTC Cadets to meet the demands of the AOC / HD 2025
Guide, Resource and Lead the JROTC Program
Precisely Recruit to Shape the Cohort ICW Army Requirements
Select and Develop World Class Cadre, Staff and Faculty
University High School
Partners
Improve Organizational Agility
AMRG
Strategic Partners
CADETS
CASAs USAR Ambs
CLE/COIs
USAR ARNG
Partners Scholarship
Program
Vision We are an innovative, effective organization manned by specially selected and qualified professional Cadre, Staff and Faculty fully prepared to educate and train the most diverse and talented Cadets from across the
Nation to become better Citizens, adaptive leaders, lifetime learners, and agile thinkers and problem solvers who are committed to the Army Ethos and Profession of Arms.
Mission USACC partners with universities to recruit, educate, develop, and inspire SROTC Cadets in order to
commission officers of character for the Total Army; and partners with high schools to conduct JROTC in order to develop citizens of character for a lifetime of commitment and service to our Nation.
USACC Strategy Map 2016
4
END STATE Win in a Complex World
Develop Cadre, Staff and Faculty who model the Army profession and inspire Cadets to learn and
grow as leaders.
Develop Cadets who meet SROTC Outcomes and Army requirements for newly commissioned 2LTs in
2025.
Provide communities a quality citizenship program for their high
school students focused on character, leadership and service to the Nation for the 21st Century.
Recruit Cadets who possess the cognitive, physical and emotional faculties, traits and attributes necessary to commission and excel as an Army 2LT.
Functionally organize and resource the command to meet goals for recruiting and leader
development.
LOE 2: Develop SROTC Cadets to meet the demands of the AOC/ HD 2025
LOE 4: Guide, Resource and Lead the JROTC Program
LOE 3: Precisely Recruit to Shape the Cohort ICW Army Requirements
LOE 1: Select and Develop World Class Cadre, Staff and Faculty
LOE 5: Improve Organizational Agility
USACC Lines of Effort (LOE) with LOE Objectives 1st Quarter FY 2016 2nd Quarter FY 2016
Implement Consortia
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 1 (Develop Agile/ Adaptive
Leaders)
Aligns with TRADOC LOE 1.7 (Optimize
SROTC)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 3.2 (Cadet Cohort
Shaping) & 4-7 (Shape Accessions Enterprise)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 1.1 (Leader
Development)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 4-5 (Optimize
Organizational Design) Gain BN HQ Approval
Plan 918 University Update Gain revised SROTC Assessment Approval
Revise CCLDS
- Implement lessons learned from CST AAR, Mission Command Workshop - Plan for next CFDC Course
Refine Cadet Quality & Diversity Initiatives
CST Preparation
TRADOC crosswalk
USACC Strategy 2016
100th Anniversary
- Continue to develop and refine the JROTC Program as the premier 21st Century character education based program for America’s youth
5
END STATE Win in a Complex World
Develop Cadre, Staff and Faculty who model the Army profession and inspire Cadets to learn and
grow as leaders.
Develop Cadets who meet SROTC Outcomes and Army requirements for newly commissioned 2LTs in
2025.
Provide communities a quality citizenship program for their high
school students focused on character, leadership and service to the Nation for the 21st Century.
Recruit Cadets who possess the cognitive, physical and emotional faculties, traits and attributes necessary to commission and excel as an Army 2LT.
Functionally organize and resource the command to meet goals for recruiting and leader
development.
LOE 4: Guide, Resource and Lead the JROTC Program
LOE 3: Precisely Recruit to Shape the Cohort ICW Army Requirements
LOE 1: Select and Develop World Class Cadre, Staff and Faculty
LOE 5: Improve Organizational Agility
USACC Lines of Effort (LOE) with LOE Objectives 1st Quarter FY 2016 2nd Quarter FY 2016
Implement Consortia
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 1 (Develop Agile/ Adaptive
Leaders)
Aligns with TRADOC LOE 1.7 (Optimize
SROTC)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 3.2 (Cadet Cohort
Shaping) & 4-7 (Shape Accessions Enterprise)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 1.1 (Leader
Development)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 4-5 (Optimize
Organizational Design) Gain BN HQ Approval
Plan 918 University Update Gain revised SROTC Assessment Approval
- Implement lessons learned from CST AAR, Mission Command Workshop - Plan for next CFDC Course
Refine Cadet Quality & Diversity Initiatives
TRADOC crosswalk
USACC Strategy 2016
100th Anniversary
- Continue to develop and refine the JROTC Program as the premier 21st Century character education based program for America’s youth
LOE 2: Develop SROTC Cadets to meet the demands of the AOC/ HD 2025
Revise CCLDS CST Preparation
6
MCWS: Informed CCLDS Design 2015 Mission Command Workshop 275 PMSs, 8 BDE CDRs, USACC Staff and Guest Speaker converge on Fort Knox to discuss the future of Cadet Character and Leader Development
The Army Human Dimension (HD) Strategy Optimizes Human Performance
Cadet Character and Leader Development must nest with and support Army concepts, doctrine and requirements
7
Ø Part I – Introduction and Environment Ø Part II – Strategic Vision Ø Part III – Operationalizing the CCLDS Ø Part IV – CCLDS Governance & Synch Ø Part V –CCLDS Annual Assessment Ø Detailed Annexes
CCLDS: Operationalizing Mission Command across USACC
CCLDS Table of Contents
To “Win in a Complex World” we must leverage all of our leadership
Principles of Mission Command • Build cohesive teams through mutual trust • Create shared understanding • Provide a clear commander’s intent • Exercise disciplined initiative • Use mission orders • Accept prudent risk
275 Universities and Colleges
8
CCLDS: Progressive Development Against Common Objectives and Endstates
COER/SF Gated targets for Formative and Summative assessments of ALRM Attributes and Competencies
WAYS – Army Developmental Domains
INSTITUTIONAL (LEARN/APPLY)
OPERATIONAL (APPLY/LEARN)
SELF-DEVELOP (BROADEN)
MSL I MSL II MSL III MSL IV MEANS (High Quality Resources and Enablers) ENDS (Clearly
stated Developmental Objectives) ROTC CURRICULA
ROTC LABS CLC CIET
CULP CULP
LDX F/S
Assess Assess Assess Assess
UNIVERSITY DEGREE CURRICULA
CPDP CPDP LDX F/S LDX F/S LDX F/S
FAB
RIC
OF
CH
AR
AC
TER
DE
VE
LOP
ME
NT
Cha
ract
er is
wov
en in
to e
very
thin
g w
e de
velo
p, a
sses
s an
d re
war
d
Mentor Relationships (Inclusive of Cadet as the mentored and providing mentorship)
SMP / Reserve Component Opportunities
University Sponsored Study Abroad Programs, Lectures, Internships, Etc.
SROTC Clubs (Ranger Challenge, Pershing Rifles, Etc.)
University Sponsored Leadership Opportunities (Athletics, Clubs, Societies, etc.) Outside Leadership Opportunities – Volunteering, Employment, Clubs, Societies, etc.
Cadet Chain of Command
External activities such as travel, unpaid internships, professional reading and writing
ROTC Standardized Testing Program and Command Interest Items
The CCLDS Cadet Development Model is nested to ALDS and FM 6-22
9
CCLDS: Progressive Assessment Against Common Objectives and Endstates
End State
ALRM Objective Statements
ALRM Performance Indicators
FM 6-22 Assessment Rubric
Character Presence Intellect Leads Develops Achieves
MSL 1-4 / CST Assessment & Evaluation
MS Class MS Lab / LDX CST
10
END STATE Win in a Complex World
Develop Cadre, Staff and Faculty who model the Army profession and inspire Cadets to learn and
grow as leaders.
Develop Cadets who meet SROTC Outcomes and Army requirements for newly commissioned 2LTs in
2025.
Provide communities a quality citizenship program for their high
school students focused on character, leadership and service to the Nation for the 21st Century.
Recruit Cadets who possess the cognitive, physical and emotional faculties, traits and attributes necessary to commission and excel as an Army 2LT.
Functionally organize and resource the command to meet goals for recruiting and leader
development.
LOE 4: Guide, Resource and Lead the JROTC Program
LOE 3: Precisely Recruit to Shape the Cohort ICW Army Requirements
LOE 1: Select and Develop World Class Cadre, Staff and Faculty
LOE 5: Improve Organizational Agility
USACC Lines of Effort (LOE) with LOE Objectives 1st Quarter FY 2016 2nd Quarter FY 2016
Implement Consortia
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 1 (Develop Agile/ Adaptive
Leaders)
Aligns with TRADOC LOE 1.7 (Optimize
SROTC)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 3.2 (Cadet Cohort
Shaping) & 4-7 (Shape Accessions Enterprise)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 1.1 (Leader
Development)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 4-5 (Optimize
Organizational Design) Gain BN HQ Approval
Plan 918 University Update Gain revised SROTC Assessment Approval
- Implement lessons learned from CST AAR, Mission Command Workshop - Plan for next CFDC Course
Refine Cadet Quality & Diversity Initiatives
TRADOC crosswalk
USACC Strategy 2016
100th Anniversary
- Continue to develop and refine the JROTC Program as the premier 21st Century character education based program for America’s youth
LOE 2: Develop SROTC Cadets to meet the demands of the AOC/ HD 2025
Revise CCLDS CST Preparation
11
Cadet Summer Training
CIET Ø Train individual and
junior leader tasks Ø Reinforce Warrior ethos
and Army values Ø 28 Days of training and
leader development Ø 7-10 Regiments; ~4000
Cadets
CPDT Ø Provides mentally /
challenging experiences
Ø CTLT: ~1,100 Cadets Ø Functional Schools
(AAS / Abn. Etc.): ~ 700 Cadets
Ø Internships: ~1000 Cadets (NSTP, EIP)
CLC
Ø Develop and strengthen Cadets’ intangible leadership attributes
Ø 31 days of development and assessment
Ø 10 Regiments; ~ 6,400 Cadets
CULP
Ø Immersive cultural environment
Ø Month long deployments ISO ASCC Security Cooperation Lines of Effort
Ø Deploy > 1000 Cadets to ~40 countries
CIET- Cadet Initial Entry Training
CLC- Cadet Leaders Course
CPDT- Cadet Professional Development Program
CULP- Cultural Understanding Language Program
5,500 support cadre from across the Army
12
Cadet Leaders Course (CLC) Evolution
LDAC 14 CLC 15 CLC 16 +
BO
LD T
RA
NSF
OR
MAT
ION
Task, Conditions, Standards Based Training
Redesigned training methodology to adopt
ASLTE and 21st Century Soldier Competencies
Removed most of the committee “station-type”
training to provide realism in the immersive
scenario
Squad and Platoon STX Lanes / Very scripted
environment
Initiated redesign of tactical scenario with
TBOC support
Refined the tactical scenario through earlier data feeds to campus on Atropian problems and
the strategic impact
Focused on receiving an overall score at the end
of camp
Focused on development of knowledge, skills, and attributes to build leaders
that thrive in chaos
Continued focus on development of intangible
traits and attributes; instituted seminar to
bridge gap between Cadet and 2nd Lieutenant
SQD / PLT STX (1200m) Mission Context Leadership Exercise
Tactical Solution (What to think) Problem solving “How to think” / Winning in a Complex World
13
CIET Numbers
CIET Leaders-Trainers
CIET Attendance Ceilings
14
END STATE Win in a Complex World
Develop Cadre, Staff and Faculty who model the Army profession and inspire Cadets to learn and
grow as leaders.
Develop Cadets who meet SROTC Outcomes and Army requirements for newly commissioned 2LTs in
2025.
Provide communities a quality citizenship program for their high
school students focused on character, leadership and service to the Nation for the 21st Century.
Recruit Cadets who possess the cognitive, physical and emotional faculties, traits and attributes necessary to commission and excel as an Army 2LT.
Functionally organize and resource the command to meet goals for recruiting and leader
development.
LOE 2: Develop SROTC Cadets to meet the demands of the AOC/ HD 2025
LOE 4: Guide, Resource and Lead the JROTC Program
LOE 1: Select and Develop World Class Cadre, Staff and Faculty
LOE 5: Improve Organizational Agility
USACC Lines of Effort (LOE) with LOE Objectives 1st Quarter FY 2016 2nd Quarter FY 2016
Implement Consortia
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 1 (Develop Agile/ Adaptive
Leaders)
Aligns with TRADOC LOE 1.7 (Optimize
SROTC)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 3.2 (Cadet Cohort
Shaping) & 4-7 (Shape Accessions Enterprise)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 1.1 (Leader
Development)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 4-5 (Optimize
Organizational Design) Gain BN HQ Approval
Plan 918 University Update Gain revised SROTC Assessment Approval
Revise CCLDS
- Implement lessons learned from CST AAR, Mission Command Workshop - Plan for next CFDC Course
CST Preparation
TRADOC crosswalk
USACC Strategy 2016
- Continue to develop and refine the JROTC Program as the premier 21st Century character education based program for America’s youth
LOE 3: Precisely Recruit to Shape the Cohort ICW Army Requirements
Refine Cadet Quality & Diversity Initiatives 100th Anniversary
15
Problem Statement Problem Statement: USACC must develop predictive methods to identify quality candidates prior to contracting IOT commission the best candidates nationally, while representing the country.
Background Ø 2,000 cadets identified in the National Scholarship
Process (Known Quality). Ø 4,000 identified regionally on campus (Unknown
Quality – focus of initiatives). Ø Once contracted, there is no mechanism to release
marginal Cadets meeting minimum standards. Ø Outcomes Metric Score(OMS) linked to Officer
success, Cadet Quality Index (CQI) linked to OMS.
Concept / Discussion Ø Cadet Quality Index (CQI) – USACC whole-
person assessment of candidates by quality. Ø Dynamic Contracting leverages CQI to shift
allocations to regions/programs with the highest quality candidates.
Ø Incremental mission shift targeting growing high quality, diverse markets in the West/ Southwest.
Ø Precision recruiting with GRFD Scholarships to increase USAR/ARNG quality.
Way Ahead
Increasing Cadet Quality LOE 3: Precisely Recruit to Shape the Cohort ICW Army Requirement
Ø NOV 14 - SEP 16 CQI benchmarking effort Ø APR 15 - MAR 16 Dynamic Contracting Ø NOV 14 – APR 16 CQI calibration Ø FEB – APR 16 In-stride cohort shaping Ø FALL 16 GT incorporation into CQI
16
Increasing Cadet Quality
2025 Projected College Enrolled Population Distribution
• Target growing high quality, diverse markets in the West/ Southwest
• Dynamic Contracting enables regional
shifts towards established quality markets
Source: Woods & Poole 2025 College Enrolled Population Estimates
2025 Largest Markets: 1. NYC 2. LA 3. Dallas-Ft Worth 4. Chicago 5. Houston
USACC cannot fully exploit these markets under current DoDI.
Shifting Mission in a Shifting Market
WV 1.09
VA 2.55
MA 0.83
MD 1.48
Hawaii 1.89
NJ 0.81
DC 0.41
DE 1.23
RI 0.63 CT
0.87
VT 1.47
NH 1.81
ME 1.81
NY 0.65
PA 1.28
NC 1.35
SC 1.56 GA
1.47
FL 0.89
AL 1.78
TN 1.20
MS 1.36 LA
0.57
KY 1.33 MO 1.17
IL 0.90
IN 0.96
OH 1.19
MI 0.86
WI 1.10
MN 1.10
IA 0.98
ND 0.90
SD
2.14
NE 1.06
KS 1.24
OK 0.87
TX 0.86
NM 1.00
CO 1.26
WY 1.38
MT 2.13
ID 1.58
NV 0.59
UT 1.35 CA
0.40
OR 0.91
WA 1.07
AR 1.11
AZ 0.60
ALASKA 1.43
Equally Represented States ( 0.80 – 1.20)
Under-Represented States ( < 0.80)
Over-Represented States ( > 1.20)
Puerto Rico 0.94
Current Population to Commissioning Ratios
17
END STATE Win in a Complex World
Develop Cadre, Staff and Faculty who model the Army profession and inspire Cadets to learn and
grow as leaders.
Develop Cadets who meet SROTC Outcomes and Army requirements for newly commissioned 2LTs in
2025.
Provide communities a quality citizenship program for their high
school students focused on character, leadership and service to the Nation for the 21st Century.
Recruit Cadets who possess the cognitive, physical and emotional faculties, traits and attributes necessary to commission and excel as an Army 2LT.
Functionally organize and resource the command to meet goals for recruiting and leader
development.
LOE 2: Develop SROTC Cadets to meet the demands of the AOC/ HD 2025
LOE 4: Guide, Resource and Lead the JROTC Program
LOE 3: Precisely Recruit to Shape the Cohort ICW Army Requirements
LOE 1: Select and Develop World Class Cadre, Staff and Faculty
USACC Lines of Effort (LOE) with LOE Objectives 1st Quarter FY 2016 2nd Quarter FY 2016
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 1 (Develop Agile/ Adaptive
Leaders)
Aligns with TRADOC LOE 1.7 (Optimize
SROTC)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 3.2 (Cadet Cohort
Shaping) & 4-7 (Shape Accessions Enterprise)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 1.1 (Leader
Development)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 4-5 (Optimize
Organizational Design)
Revise CCLDS
- Implement lessons learned from CST AAR, Mission Command Workshop - Plan for next CFDC Course
Refine Cadet Quality & Diversity Initiatives
CST Preparation
TRADOC crosswalk
USACC Strategy 2016
100th Anniversary
- Continue to develop and refine the JROTC Program as the premier 21st Century character education based program for America’s youth
LOE 5: Improve Organizational Agility
Implement Consortia Gain BN HQ Approval
Plan 918 University Update Gain revised SROTC Assessment Approval
18
Cadet Command Restructuring
USACC is: Ø Challenged by unwieldy span of control for its brigades (8 Bdes, 275 programs) and an
impending reduction of 152 civilian authorizations Ø Consolidating logistics and support functions at 70-75 “Task Force” locations Ø Planning to create 33 battalion headquarters to improve C2 of its programs
Ø Task Force activations are underway Ø Approval for creation of Bns at higher
headquarters
19
END STATE Win in a Complex World
Develop Cadre, Staff and Faculty who model the Army profession and inspire Cadets to learn and
grow as leaders.
Develop Cadets who meet SROTC Outcomes and Army requirements for newly commissioned 2LTs in
2025.
Provide communities a quality citizenship program for their high
school students focused on character, leadership and service to the Nation for the 21st Century.
Recruit Cadets who possess the cognitive, physical and emotional faculties, traits and attributes necessary to commission and excel as an Army 2LT.
Functionally organize and resource the command to meet goals for recruiting and leader
development.
LOE 2: Develop SROTC Cadets to meet the demands of the AOC/ HD 2025
LOE 3: Precisely Recruit to Shape the Cohort ICW Army Requirements
LOE 1: Select and Develop World Class Cadre, Staff and Faculty
LOE 5: Improve Organizational Agility
USACC Lines of Effort (LOE) with LOE Objectives 1st Quarter FY 2016 2nd Quarter FY 2016
Implement Consortia
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 1 (Develop Agile/ Adaptive
Leaders)
Aligns with TRADOC LOE 1.7 (Optimize
SROTC)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 3.2 (Cadet Cohort
Shaping) & 4-7 (Shape Accessions Enterprise)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 1.1 (Leader
Development)
Aligns w/ TRADOC LOE 4-5 (Optimize
Organizational Design) Gain BN HQ Approval
Plan 918 University Update Gain revised SROTC Assessment Approval
Revise CCLDS
- Implement lessons learned from CST AAR, Mission Command Workshop - Plan for next CFDC Course
Refine Cadet Quality & Diversity Initiatives
CST Preparation
TRADOC crosswalk
USACC Strategy 2016
100th Anniversary
LOE 4: Guide, Resource and Lead the JROTC Program
- Continue to develop and refine the JROTC Program as the premier 21st Century character education based program for America’s youth
20
State of Army JROTC FY16-21
Undersubscribed
Oversubscribed
NDCCUnits:28
• Program Oversight: • 1,701 Army JROTC Units Spanning the Globe
• Plus 28 NDCC – 1,729 • ~3,990 Instructors • ~310,000 Cadets
• Focus on program effectiveness—
• Instructor capability • Classroom capability • Increase co-curricular
experience/participation • Post-Secondary Education • Leverage Future Technology • Outreach - getting our
“message” out – program success / impacting, changing, and saving lives!
§ Personnel Manning-- • 25% personnel reduction • 93 Assigned Civilian Staff • Reduced Civilian Staff to 72
JROTC Program FY16-21 Continuous Improvement Plan • Curriculum—Recently Accredited by AdvancED • Army Directive 2014-23 (Screening Individuals with contact with children under age of 18) • Implementation of Common Access Card (CAC) Plan • USACC 100th Anniversary “Fun Run”
13 MA
22 MD
24 NJ
11 DC
5 DE
3 RI
5 CT
3 VT
2 NH 5 ME
24 NY
27 PA
59 VA
SC
115 GA
160 FL
74 AL 52
MS 59 LA
30 MO
47 IL
20 IN
23 OH
36 MI 4 WI
5 MN
4 IA
3 ND
5 SD
8 NE
10 KS
19 OK
198 TX
17 NM
21 CO
2 WY
1 MT
1/17 ID
5 UT
82 CA
5 OR
10 WA
22 WV
24 AR
26 AZ
7
AK
15 NV
KY
TN NC
62
74 130
85
US Army Cadet Command Leaders for Life
Leadership Excellence This We’ll Defend
22
Back Up
23
Enrolled: Number of Army ROTC Cadets who received leadership training for that School Year Sclrshp: Number of Cadets who received Army ROTC Scholarship benefits for all Mission Sets for that School Year Funding: Amount of Army ROTC Incentives dollars spent for that Program for all Mission Sets for that School Year
Military College Previous Commitments
SY1314 SY1415 Enrolled Sclrshp Funding Enrolled Sclrshp Funding
Georgia Military College 391 98 $ 1,764,621 270 97 $ 1,701,937 Marion Military Institute 452 52 $ 522,422 579 54 $ 526,865 New Mexico Military Institute 491 41 $ 222,993 376 35 $ 220,468 Valley Forge Military College 137 48 $ 1,120,110 132 55 $ 1,341,754 Wentworth Military Academy & College 128 69 $ 1,262,141 108 63 $ 1,269,060 Norwich University 610 230 $ 6,941,845 574 218 $ 7,228,014 Texas A&M University 706 218 $ 1,778,437 753 197 $ 1,712,917 The Citadel 1580 239 $ 4,953,274 1320 243 $ 5,788,769 University of North Georgia 882 125 $ 1,030,267 868 131 $ 1,120,536 Virginia Military Institute 929 235 $ 4,798,121 836 262 $ 6,151,103 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 474 269 $ 4,331,043 505 262 $ 4,567,595
1st Brigade Scholarships: SY13/14 – SY14/15
24
4Yr Avg – Comm Mission: Average Commission Mission from this year to 4 years out Sclrshp: Number of Cadets who received Army ROTC Scholarship benefits for all Mission Sets for that School Year Funding: Amount of Army ROTC Incentives dollars spent for that Program for all Mission Sets for that School Year
Military College 4Yr Avg - Comm Mission
Current and Future Commitments SY1516 SY1617 SY1718 SY1819
Sclrshp Funding Sclrshp Funding Sclrshp Funding Sclrshp Funding Georgia Military College 35 92 $ 1,841,898 95 $ 2,056,194 85 $ 1,792,261 36 $ 770,343 Marion Military Institute 27 70 $ 739,768 68 $ 755,560 66 $ 769,402 37 $ 422,383 New Mexico Military Institute 29 32 $ 292,527 25 $ 283,662 24 $ 282,000 14 $ 165,490 Valley Forge Military College 22 52 $ 1,534,705 61 $ 1,817,825 57 $ 1,768,280 26 $ 916,760 Wentworth Military Academy & College 22 62 $ 1,340,009 71 $ 1,543,528 70 $ 1,533,960 40 $ 954,720 Norwich University 85 238 $ 8,452,755 265 $ 8,925,200 189 $ 6,428,708 89 $ 2,909,385 Texas A&M University 96 226 $ 2,370,362 247 $ 2,363,630 177 $ 1,717,608 82 $ 763,458 The Citadel 106 270 $ 7,218,996 302 $ 7,510,207 197 $ 5,009,037 93 $ 2,295,316 University of North Georgia 90 148 $ 1,562,426 184 $ 1,385,381 140 $ 1,070,255 76 $ 618,656 Virginia Military Institute 107 288 $ 7,296,877 242 $ 5,835,864 171 $ 4,236,178 80 $ 1,731,200 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 74 266 $ 5,102,432 235 $ 4,567,500 166 $ 3,347,430 75 $ 1,602,555
1st Brigade Scholarships: SY15/16 – SY18/19
25
Establishing Quality Thresholds
HSCGPA:
CollegeCGPA:
SATEquivalent:
APFTScore:
PMSScore:
BoardScore:
HSCGPA:
CollegeCGPA:
SATEquivalent:
APFTScore:
PMSScore:
BoardScore:
HSCGPA:
CollegeCGPA:
SATEquivalent:
APFTScore:
PMSScore:
BoardScore:
Example:
3.503.0010602351513
3.302.809901901312
Candidates are categorized by the CQI…..
…and the CQI is used to establish the overall quality of the cohort.
50%
40%
10%
Desired (flexible) makeup
Cohort Makeup Min CQI:
90
Min CQI: 80
Min CQI: 70
3.903.4012502801515 2016 2017 2018
8.0% 10.5% 13.2%51.0% 57.8% 60.5%40.9% 31.7% 26.3%
Current USACC Cohorts
OMLTop
Quartile 2nd
Quartile 3rd
Quartile Bottom Quartile
A 77% 18% 3% 2% B 34% 34% 23% 9% C 6% 16% 33% 44%
CQI can serve as an assessment tool to inform contracting decisions and as an “in-stride” assessment of cadet performance.