High Force Thermal Latches
Presented byKaren Hawes ASEN 5519 Fall [email protected]
Designed ByWilliam Nygren
Built ByStarsys Research Center
High Force Thermal Latches (HFTL)
HFTLs Presentation
❚ Problem Statement❚ Trade Study Summary❚ Design Features❚ HFTL Operation (Steps 1-10)❚ Design Devlopment❚ Summary❚ References
Problem Statement
Need a release device that,❚ provides support for a high load path;❚ is small in size;❚ is light in weight;❚ is simple in operation & maintenance;❚ is a non-pyro activated device;❚ induces low-to-no loads into the two sides
of the mated interface.
Trade Study Summary
“Old” device a.k.a “Claw” mechanism:❚ Cons of “Old” device:
It was larger, heavier, more complex, and provided a lower pre-load.
❚ Pros of “Old” device:It was capable of re-mating the two assemblies on orbit.
Design Features
BODY-SIDE Features❚ Assist Spring: Crest-to-Crest Wave spring provides a higher force with the
desired (long) stroke of up to 3/4 inch, versus other spring designs (Belleville or Coil springs).
❚ Cylinder: Beryllium Copper (http://www.be-cu.com/beryllium_copper.html) provides adequate strength for the static pressure loads, once the Slug has melted; it also expands adequately to provide a flow path.
❚ Slug: A low-Temp Fusible Alloy Lead-Bismuth (http://www.welcocastings.com/products/fusible-print.htm).
❚ Limit Switch: “Implies” separation, position of Cylinder is such that the likelihood of the Latch Bolt bieng in the Body-Side are unlikely.
❚ Heating Element: High W/area (125-200 W/sq-in), custom made by Memco, heating the Cylinder and Slug materials from -10 C to 71 C in no more than 10 Minutes.
Design Features, con’t
DEPLOYED-SIDE Features❚ Latch Bolt: Multi-Phase Nickel Cobalt; supports high loads, up to 8000 lbf.❚ Retractor Spring: Low spring constant allows for easy installation.❚ Super Nut/Jack Screws: Sequential torquing of eight screws, at low loads,
provides the high load through the Latch Bolt.
Design Features, con’t
Design Features, con’t
BODY-SIDE OF HFTL DEPLOYED-SIDE OF HFTL
HFTL Cross-Sectional View
HFTL Operation
INSTALLATION:❚ Prepare Body-Side of device by pre-loading the assist spring after first
melting the slug and compressing the Assist Spring; allow the slug material to solidify in the pre-load position.
❚ Install two halves of the device into the two sides of mated assembly.❚ On the Body-Side of the device, move the Slide Gate away from the mated
interface, to allow room for the Latch Bolt.❚ Insert the Latch Bolt into the Body-Side cavity and lock into place by
moving the Slide Gate back towards the mated interface.❚ Pre-load the Latch Bolt to desired, high load, by sequentially torquing the
eight Jack Screws. Possible loading up to 8000 lbf (+/- 500 lbf).
HFTL Operation, con’t
OPERATION:❚ Apply current to the device, heating the thermal element which expands
the Cylinder (around the carrier and Piston) and melts the Slug material.❚ The Cylinder expands around 120 F, Slug melts around 124 F.❚ The expansion of the cylinder provides the path for fluid flow, once the
Slug melts; the Assist Spring provides the force to move the Piston/Cylinder assembly which slides the Latch Bolt past the Slide Gate.
❚ Once the Latch Bolt passes the outer edge of the Slide Gate, the two halves are demated. The Assist Spring and Retractor Spring apply a load against the loose parts of each half, to fully contain them.
❚ Once the Slug material solidifies, this will also lock the parts of the Body-Side assembly.
❚ A Limit Switch provides the telemetry which indicates the Carrier has moved past a certain position, implying separation.
HFTL Operation, Steps 1-5Body-Side of HFTLInstalled on Body
Carrier & Assist Springin Pre-Loaded Position
Slug Materialin Solid State
Slide Gate“down”
Slide Gate“up”
Deployed-Side of HFTLInstalled on Separation Item
Retractor Springin Un-Loaded Position
Cover Not Installed
Deployed-SideRetractor Spring
in Pre-Loaded
Position
Latch Boltin Positionwith Carrier
Interface Line
Slug
Carrier
Latch Bolt
STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5
HFTL Operation, Steps 6-10
Slide Gate“down”
Latch Bolt isnow locked
Torque Jack Screwsto Pre-Load the
Latch Bolt
STEP 6 STEP 7 STEP 8 STEP 9 STEP 10
Cover Installed
Interface Line
Actuationstarts onceSlug melts
Carriermoves down
Latch Boltis released
Lower side now deployed
Assist Springcompresses Carrierand holds Body-Side
assembly
Retractor Springholds Latch Bolt
and Deployed-Sideassembly
Design Development
The Cylinder was made aluminum but cracked during testing. Results found that the Slug material, which was Tin Bismuth, reacted with the aluminum through small cracks in the anodized surface, causing metal embrittlement and eventual failure.
The Slug material was changed to Lead Bismuth and the Cylinder to Beryllium Copper. The added strength of the Beryllium Copper allowed the walls to be thinner, increasing the surface-area to volume ratio - which also reduced the overall static pressure.
Design Development, con’t
Cracked inner (anodized) wall of aluminum cylinder
Design Development, con’t
Cracked outer wall of aluminum cylinder
Design Development, con’t
The Retractor Spring induces forces that are relatively too high for certain applications. Methods to reduce this are being pursued currently.
The pre-load of the spring is approximately 20 lbf at 1.2 inches of compression. For F=-kx, 20=-k(1.2), so k=16.66 lbf/in.
The potential energy is P.E. = 1/2kx2, so P.E. = 11.99 in-lbf (fairly low)Possible alternative design is the FASSN, also designed by William
Nygren, which dissipates the energy with a mini flywheel operation. Additional design research is a possibility for those interested in the FASSN device.
Summary
❚ This device is small yet it still provides a high-force load path.❚ It is simple to install and can be re-set for multiple operations
on the ground; only one operation is available on orbit.❚ Do not need motors to operate on orbit; it is simple to
operate and requires minimal telemetry to initiate and confirm operation.
❚ Quick deployment without pyro-devices - safer to handle.❚ Low loads are induced into the two halves of the interface.❚ Reliability of operation is shown to be high.
References
❚ Starsys Research Center: Doug MonickCritical Design Review package 5/28/97
❚ Lockheed Martin-Denver: Karl Fortney, Rod Sumpter, and Roger HirschmanLMA Drawing PD9500056, rev C, “HFTL”Trade Summary Memo, dated 1/30/95Failure Analysis Lab, Report # SPL13342DS Procedure 6ME69-B
❚ Also, see websites in text for supplemental “FYI” information:www.welcocastings.com/products/fusible-print.htmwww.be-cu.com/beryllium_copper.htmlwww.inco.net/inco/nispanc902.htm
❚ Additional thanks to William Nygren for the original design of the HFTL and FASSN.
Blue Skies!