Date post: | 11-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | amber-bailey |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 2 times |
presented to
Wisconsin Department of Transportation - Northwest Region
presented by
Christopher Hedden and Brian Scott
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and SRF Inc.
10/15/07
Traffic Operations Sketch PlansCorridor Sketch Plan Methodology – Update to the Regions
2
Agenda
Introductions
Sketch Plan Update – Progress to Date
• Methodology and Criteria− Approach
− Criteria
• Data Collection, Analysis, and Synthesis
• Draft Regional Results− Regional Smoothed Data
− Regional Corridors
Next Steps
3
Project Overview
23 month project
• Initiated July 06
Corridor Planning Methodology for Traffic Operations
Todd Szymkowski – TOPS
Cambridge Systematics
Ramp Control and Surveillance
Travel Warning and Information Systems
Traffic Signal Systems
Marie Treazise - WisDOT
SRF
Dave Kreitzmann - WisDOT
SEH
Joanna Bush - WisDOT
Jacobs - E&K
Sketch Plan Methodology
5
Approach to Developing Methodology
Based on WisDOT planning perspective
• Central and Regions
Integrate or utilize current processes as much as possible
Planning/Programming/Budget Scan
• Interviewed Central Office and Research
• Researched key current processes
− Corridor Approach
6
Interviews
DTIM
• Mark Wolfgram
Southeast
• Donna Brown
• Bob Anderson
Southwest
• John Vesperman
• Dan Pruess
Northwest
• Gary Bruner
Planning
• Aileen Switzer
• Jennifer Murphy
Budget
• Casey Newman
• Karl Kuecker
7
Initial Findings
Strong support for Operations/ITS
Criteria development seen as most critical step
• Statewide
Unanimous support for a mechanism by which Operations/ITS needs can be identified across the state
• Prioritized list
• Guidelines for implementation (field device density and type)
Operations/ITS needs to be reflected at the policy level
• System Preservation Theme
8
What should the SPT NOT Do?
Do not create a mechanism which prolongs the project development timeline
9
2 Goals – 2 Methodologies
11stst Goal: Develop Goal: Develop ITS Solutions by ITS Solutions by
CorridorsCorridors
CriteriaCriteria
ITS ITS Projects Projects
appropriate appropriate for each for each corridorcorridor
22ndnd Goal: Goal: Prioritization Prioritization
ProcessProcess
CriteriaCriteria
ITS ITS Projects Projects
appropriate appropriate for all the for all the corridorscorridors
By CorridorBy Corridor
Meta Meta ModuleModule
10
IdentifyIdentifyDistrict Priority Management Corridors for further District Priority Management Corridors for further
developing a Corridor Management Visiondeveloping a Corridor Management Vision(Quantitative and Qualitative)(Quantitative and Qualitative)
IdentifyIdentifyStatewide Significant CorridorsStatewide Significant Corridors
(Connections 2030, SAMP)(Connections 2030, SAMP)
Develop a Corridor Management VisionDevelop a Corridor Management Vision
In creation of a vision, the same “factors” are used, however In creation of a vision, the same “factors” are used, however District Information will account for more details and District Information will account for more details and
regional/local issues. Community involvement would be part of regional/local issues. Community involvement would be part of
thisthis step.step.
Identify and select Strategies and Tools to Identify and select Strategies and Tools to achieve the Corridor Management Visionachieve the Corridor Management Vision
Implement the Corridor Management VisionImplement the Corridor Management Vision
Update and revise the Corridor Management Update and revise the Corridor Management Vision and Implementation Strategies as needed.Vision and Implementation Strategies as needed.
11
IdentifyIdentifyRegion Priority Management Corridors for further Region Priority Management Corridors for further
developing a Corridor Management Visiondeveloping a Corridor Management Vision(Quantitative and Qualitative)(Quantitative and Qualitative)
IdentifyIdentifyStatewide Significant CorridorsStatewide Significant Corridors
(Connections 2030, SAMP)(Connections 2030, SAMP)
Develop a Corridor Management VisionDevelop a Corridor Management Vision
In creation of a vision, the same “factors” are used, however In creation of a vision, the same “factors” are used, however Region Information will account for more details and Region Information will account for more details and
regional/local issues. Community involvement would be part of regional/local issues. Community involvement would be part of
thisthis step.step.
Identify and select Strategies and Tools to Identify and select Strategies and Tools to achieve the Corridor Management Visionachieve the Corridor Management Vision
Implement the Corridor Management VisionImplement the Corridor Management Vision
Update and revise the Corridor Management Update and revise the Corridor Management Vision and Implementation Strategies as needed.Vision and Implementation Strategies as needed.
Outside of Corridor Management Workgroup
Restart Process
ITS Sketch ITS Sketch Planning Planning
MethodologyMethodology
1. Recommended ITS Solutions/Projects by Corridor
2. Prioritization By Corridor
Relevant Criteria
12
IdentifyIdentifyDistrict Priority Management Corridors for further District Priority Management Corridors for further
developing a Corridor Management Visiondeveloping a Corridor Management Vision(Quantitative and Qualitative)(Quantitative and Qualitative)
IdentifyIdentifyStatewide Significant CorridorsStatewide Significant Corridors
(Connections 2030, SAMP)(Connections 2030, SAMP)
Develop a Corridor Management VisionDevelop a Corridor Management Vision
In creation of a vision, the same “factors” are used, however In creation of a vision, the same “factors” are used, however District Information will account for more details and District Information will account for more details and
regional/local issues. Community involvement would be part of regional/local issues. Community involvement would be part of
thisthis step.step.
Identify and select Strategies and Tools to Identify and select Strategies and Tools to achieve the Corridor Management Visionachieve the Corridor Management Vision
Implement the Corridor Management VisionImplement the Corridor Management Vision
Update and revise the Corridor Management Update and revise the Corridor Management Vision and Implementation Strategies as needed.Vision and Implementation Strategies as needed.
13
IdentifyIdentifyDistrict Priority Management Corridors for further District Priority Management Corridors for further
developing a Corridor Management Visiondeveloping a Corridor Management Vision(Quantitative and Qualitative)(Quantitative and Qualitative)
IdentifyIdentifyStatewide Significant CorridorsStatewide Significant Corridors
(Connections 2030, SAMP)(Connections 2030, SAMP)
Develop a Corridor Management VisionDevelop a Corridor Management Vision
In creation of a vision, the same “factors” are used, however In creation of a vision, the same “factors” are used, however District Information will account for more details and District Information will account for more details and
regional/local issues. Community involvement would be part of regional/local issues. Community involvement would be part of
thisthis step.step.
Identify and select Strategies and Tools to Identify and select Strategies and Tools to achieve the Corridor Management Visionachieve the Corridor Management Vision
Implement the Corridor Management VisionImplement the Corridor Management Vision
Update and revise the Corridor Management Update and revise the Corridor Management Vision and Implementation Strategies as needed.Vision and Implementation Strategies as needed.
Integration of operations into corridor planning begins at this phase.
14
IdentifyIdentifyDistrict Priority Management Corridors for further District Priority Management Corridors for further
developing a Corridor Management Visiondeveloping a Corridor Management Vision(Quantitative and Qualitative)(Quantitative and Qualitative)
IdentifyIdentifyStatewide Significant CorridorsStatewide Significant Corridors
(Connections 2030, SAMP)(Connections 2030, SAMP)
Develop a Corridor Management VisionDevelop a Corridor Management Vision
In creation of a vision, the same “factors” are used, however In creation of a vision, the same “factors” are used, however District Information will account for more details and District Information will account for more details and
regional/local issues. Community involvement would be part of regional/local issues. Community involvement would be part of
thisthis step.step.
Identify and select Strategies and Tools to Identify and select Strategies and Tools to achieve the Corridor Management Visionachieve the Corridor Management Vision
Implement the Corridor Management VisionImplement the Corridor Management Vision
Update and revise the Corridor Management Update and revise the Corridor Management Vision and Implementation Strategies as needed.Vision and Implementation Strategies as needed.
Stage One Factors (Quantitative)Stage One Factors (Quantitative)
MobilityMobility 50%50%
Functional Class/Corridor 2020 DesignationFunctional Class/Corridor 2020 Designation 15%15%Year 2030 LOSYear 2030 LOS 20%20%Truck ADTTruck ADT 10%10%Recreation Factor GroupRecreation Factor Group 5%5%
SafetySafety 20%20%
Crash RateCrash Rate 10%10%Crash SeverityCrash Severity 10%10%
Development PressureDevelopment Pressure 30%30%
Population Projections by CVT to 2020Population Projections by CVT to 2020 15%15%Land Conversion Rate by CVT from Ag/VacantLand Conversion Rate by CVT from Ag/Vacant 15%15% to Residential, Commercial, to Residential, Commercial, Manufacturing, 1990-2000Manufacturing, 1990-2000
15
Sketch Planning Methodology Criteria
Used 42 initial criteria as starting point
• Strive for consistency with main Corridor Planning Methodology
• Realistically measure the effectiveness of alternatives
• Allow operational alternative to be compared− With each other
− With other types of improvements
− Drives toward a hybrid approach that includes traditional as well as operational metrics
• Data readily available− Quality controlled
− Regularly updated
• Results can be easily summarized
Stage One Factors (Quantitative)Stage One Factors (Quantitative)
MobilityMobility 50%50%
Functional Class/Corridor 2020 DesignationFunctional Class/Corridor 2020 Designation 15%15%Year 2030 LOSYear 2030 LOS 20%20%Truck ADTTruck ADT 10%10%Recreation Factor GroupRecreation Factor Group 5%5%
SafetySafety 20%20%
Crash RateCrash Rate 10%10%Crash SeverityCrash Severity 10%10%
Development PressureDevelopment Pressure 30%30%
Population Projections by CVT to 2020Population Projections by CVT to 2020 15%15%Land Conversion Rate by CVT from Ag/VacantLand Conversion Rate by CVT from Ag/Vacant 15%15%to Residential, Commercial, to Residential, Commercial,
Manufacturing, 1990Manufacturing, 1990--20002000
Stage One Factors (Quantitative)Stage One Factors (Quantitative)
MobilityMobility 50%50%
Functional Class/Corridor 2020 DesignationFunctional Class/Corridor 2020 Designation 15%15%Year 2030 LOSYear 2030 LOS 20%20%Truck ADTTruck ADT 10%10%Recreation Factor GroupRecreation Factor Group 5%5%
SafetySafety 20%20%
Crash RateCrash Rate 10%10%Crash SeverityCrash Severity 10%10%
Development PressureDevelopment Pressure 30%30%
Population Projections by CVT to 2020Population Projections by CVT to 2020 15%15%Land Conversion Rate by CVT from Ag/VacantLand Conversion Rate by CVT from Ag/Vacant 15%15%to Residential, Commercial, to Residential, Commercial,
Manufacturing, 1990Manufacturing, 1990--20002000
Corridor Planning CriteriaCorridor Planning Criteria
16
Final Sketch Plan Criteria
Criteria Weight
MobilityMobility 50%
ADT Base Year 10%
ADT Forecast Year 7%
HC ADT Base Year 4%
Peak Hour V/C - LOS 12%
Congestion Forecast Year – LOS 12%
SafetySafety 40%
Crash Rate 15%
Crash Severity 13%
Weather Index 9%
Developmental Developmental PressuresPressures
10%
ADT Growth 7%
Event/Traffic Generators 11%
Data Collection, Analysis, and Synthesis
18
Data for Sketch Planning Methodology
Meta-Manager Data
• DTIM - Bureau of State Highway Programs − AADT
− AADT Future
− HCADT
− V/C - LOS
− LOS Future
− Crash Rate
− Crash Severity Index
− Roll-up
Weather Data
• UW TOPS Lab Data
Event Data
• Bureau of Traffic Forecasting
19
Weather Data
University of Wisconsin TOPS Laboratory
• Application of Road Weather Safety Audit to the Wisconsin Highway System
− Qin, Noyce, Martin, and Khan
Two data sets
• Weather observation data
• Weather-related crash data− Selected Conditions Data
♦ Minimal variation over time♦ Crash data requires updating in future
years♦ Crash data requires additional
manipulation
21
Event Data
WisDOT - Bureau of Traffic Forecasting
• 86 events across the state− Names
− Location
− Duration
− Frequency
− Attendance
231234
Mobility
Congestion 25% Above Statewide Average
Targeted Traveler Information Travel Time Incident Alternate Routes
DMSHARKiosks511
ThresholdThreshold SolutionSolution TechnologiesTechnologiesStage One Stage One Factors Factors
(Quantitative)(Quantitative)
15% Crash Rate Above Average
Surveillance
Speed Warning System
CCTVSpeed DetectorVehicle Class DetectorDMS Warning
Safety Measures
Crash Rates
Sketch Planning MethodologyOverview
24
Sketch Plan MethodologyOverview
Thresholds by Facility Type
• Urban Interstate
• Urban Expressway
• Urban Other
• Rural Interstate
• Rural Expressway
• Rural Other
Four Deployment Densities
• Baseline
• Low
• Medium
• High
MetamanagerMetamanager
Weather DataWeather Data
Local Studies/Local Studies/Data CollectionData Collection
Determine Criteria Values Determine Criteria Values for Linkfor Link
Compare versus ThresholdsCompare versus ThresholdsBy Facility TypeBy Facility Type
Calculate Score for Link Calculate Score for Link Utilizing Criteria WeightsUtilizing Criteria Weights
Identify Deployment IntensityIdentify Deployment Intensity
Specify TechnologiesSpecify Technologies
Spectrum of Deployment Density, Urban Freeways/Expressways
Spectrum of Deployment Density, Urban Freeways/Expressways
Spectrum of Deployment Density, Rural Freeways/Expressways
Spectrum of Deployment Density, Urban and Rural Arterials
Surveillance
Detection
Traffic Management
Traveler Information
Incident Management
Weather Systems
511
34
Sketch Planning Tool
Excel VB Tool
• Includes Thresholds and Weights− Sensitivity Analysis
• Allows Scenario Specific Analysis
• Includes GIS Output for All Corridors
• Includes Scores for:− Sketch Plan Links
− Meta-Manager Links
Next Steps