+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Press Release - · PDF fileDuring the period, we acquired Madrid Xanadú for €530...

Press Release - · PDF fileDuring the period, we acquired Madrid Xanadú for €530...

Date post: 16-Feb-2018
Category:
Upload: danghuong
View: 215 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
64
1 27 JULY 2017 INTU PROPERTIES PLC INTERIM REPORT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED 30 JUNE 2017 David Fischel, intu Chief Executive, commented: intu has performed robustly over the six month period in a UK retail environment which continues to be challenging. Retail brands are being selective in their expansion, looking at established locations such as our 17 prime shopping centres which are attracting high footfall through their differentiated offering and compelling customer experience. The resilience of the tenant market in our centres is shown by our 103 lettings in the period at 7 per cent above previous passing rents, including brands such as Next, River Island, Hugo Boss, Gant, Paul Smith, Victoria’s Secret and Tesla. Also our tenants continue to invest in upsizing and upgrading their units which has resulted in maintained high occupancy. Our £679 million UK development programme is progressing on schedule with the £180 million intu Watford extension on target to open in Autumn 2018. We expect to start shortly on the £71 million intu Lakeside leisure extension which is over 90 per cent let to tenants including Nickelodeon, Hollywood Bowl and multiple restaurants. Our Spanish business continues to perform well and intu now owns three of the country’s top ten shopping centres. During the period, we acquired Madrid Xanadú for €530 million, a centre which has strong leisure attractions including an indoor ski slope, with an aquarium and Nickelodeon theme park attraction under construction. We have a clear strategy to deliver long-term value to shareholders and, with cash and available facilities amounting to £920 million, we have significant flexibility to pursue opportunities as they arise in the UK and Spain. Investor presentation A presentation to analysts and investors will take place at UBS, 5 Broadgate, London EC2 at 09.30BST on 27 July 2017. The presentation will also be available to international analysts and investors through a live audio call and webcast. The presentation and a copy of this announcement will be available on the Group’s website intugroup.co.uk. Enquiries intu properties plc David Fischel Chief Executive +44 (0)20 7960 1207 Matthew Roberts Chief Financial Officer +44 (0)20 7960 1353 Adrian Croft Head of Investor Relations +44 (0)20 7960 1212 Public relations UK: Justin Griffiths, Powerscourt +44 (0)20 7250 1446 SA: Frédéric Cornet, Instinctif Partners +27 (0)11 447 3030 Press Release
Transcript

1

27 JULY 2017 INTU PROPERTIES PLC INTERIM REPORT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED 30 JUNE 2017

David Fischel, intu Chief Executive, commented: “intu has performed robustly over the six month period in a UK retail environment which continues to be challenging. Retail brands are being selective in their expansion, looking at established locations such as our 17 prime shopping centres which are attracting high footfall through their differentiated offering and compelling customer experience.

The resilience of the tenant market in our centres is shown by our 103 lettings in the period at 7 per cent above previous passing rents, including brands such as Next, River Island, Hugo Boss, Gant, Paul Smith, Victoria’s Secret and Tesla. Also our tenants continue to invest in upsizing and upgrading their units which has resulted in maintained high occupancy.

Our £679 million UK development programme is progressing on schedule with the £180 million intu Watford extension on target to open in Autumn 2018. We expect to start shortly on the £71 million intu Lakeside leisure extension which is over 90 per cent let to tenants including Nickelodeon, Hollywood Bowl and multiple restaurants.

Our Spanish business continues to perform well and intu now owns three of the country’s top ten shopping centres. During the period, we acquired Madrid Xanadú for €530 million, a centre which has strong leisure attractions including an indoor ski slope, with an aquarium and Nickelodeon theme park attraction under construction.

We have a clear strategy to deliver long-term value to shareholders and, with cash and available facilities amounting to £920 million, we have significant flexibility to pursue opportunities as they arise in the UK and Spain.”

Investor presentation

A presentation to analysts and investors will take place at UBS, 5 Broadgate, London EC2 at 09.30BST on 27 July

2017. The presentation will also be available to international analysts and investors through a live audio call and

webcast. The presentation and a copy of this announcement will be available on the Group’s website intugroup.co.uk.

Enquiries intu properties plc David Fischel Chief Executive +44 (0)20 7960 1207 Matthew Roberts Chief Financial Officer +44 (0)20 7960 1353 Adrian Croft Head of Investor Relations +44 (0)20 7960 1212 Public relations UK: Justin Griffiths, Powerscourt +44 (0)20 7250 1446 SA: Frédéric Cornet, Instinctif Partners +27 (0)11 447 3030

Press Release

2

CONTENTS

Highlights 3

Operating review 5

Top properties 11

Financial review 12

Market review 19

Principal risks and uncertainties 20

Directors’ responsibility statement 23

Independent review report 24

Unaudited financial information 25

Other information 50

Glossary 61

Dividends 64

About intu

intu is the UK's leading owner, manager and developer of prime regional shopping centres with a growing presence in Spain. We

are passionate about creating uniquely compelling experiences, in centre and online, that attract customers, delivering enhanced

footfall, dwell time and loyalty. This helps our retailers flourish, driving occupancy and income growth.

We own many of the UK's largest and most popular retail destinations, with super-regional centres such as intu Trafford Centre and

intu Lakeside and vibrant city centre locations from Newcastle to Watford.

We are focused on four strategic objectives: optimising the performance of our assets to deliver attractive long-term total property

returns, progressing our UK development pipeline to add value to our portfolio, leveraging the strength of our brand and seizing the

opportunity in Spain to create a business of scale.

We are committed to our local communities, our centres support over 120,000 jobs representing about 4 per cent of the total UK

retail workforce, and to operating with environmental responsibility.

Our success creates value for our retailers, investors and the communities we serve.

Presentation of information

We account for our interests in joint ventures using the equity method as required by IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements. This means that

the income statement and the balance sheet include single lines for the Group's total share of post-tax profit and the net

investment in joint ventures respectively.

Management review and monitor performance as well as determine the strategy of the business primarily on a proportionately

consolidated basis. This includes the Group’s share of joint ventures on an individual line-by-line basis rather than a post-tax profit

or net investment basis. The figures and commentary presented are consistent with our management approach as we believe this

provides a more meaningful analysis of the Group’s performance. The other information section provides reconciliations of the

income statement and balance sheet between the two bases.

See financial review for more details on the presentation of information and alternative performance measures used.

This press release contains “forward-looking statements” regarding the belief or current expectations of intu properties plc, its Directors and other members of its senior management about intu properties plc’s businesses, financial performance and results of operations. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Rather, they are based on current views and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of intu properties plc and are difficult to predict, that may cause actual results, performance or developments to differ materially from any future results, performance or developments expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as at the date of this press release. Except as required by applicable law, intu properties plc makes no representation or

warranty in relation to them and expressly disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in intu properties plc’s expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. Any information contained in this press release on the price at which shares or other securities in intu properties plc have been bought or sold in the past, or on the yield on such shares or other securities, should not be relied upon as a guide to future performance.

3

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE FIRST SIX MONTHS OF 2017

Operating highlights

Optimising asset performance

We aim to deliver attractive long-term total property returns from strong, stable income streams

after increases of 1.8 per cent in 2015 and 3.6 per cent in 2016, like-for-like net rental income decreased by 1.5 per cent

in the period, against a strong comparative of 7.5 per cent increase for the first half of 2016; guidance of second half

recovery to deliver unchanged outcome for 2017

signed 103 long-term leases (80 in the UK and 23 in Spain) delivering £18 million of annual rent at an average of

7 per cent above previous passing rent and in line with valuers’ assumptions

occupancy stable at 95.9 per cent (December 2016: 96.0 per cent)

footfall decreased by 0.5 per cent (2016: +1.3 per cent) outperforming the national ShopperTrak retail average which fell

by 2.7 per cent in the period

like-for-like property values improved slightly in the period, increasing by 0.2 per cent, broadly in line with the IPD monthly

retail index of 0.6 per cent (2016: intu +0.0 per cent; IPD down 4.7 per cent)

Delivering UK developments

By extending and enhancing our existing locations we aim to deliver superior returns

capital expenditure of £99 million in the period including £40 million on the £180 million extension of intu Watford which is

on target to open in Autumn 2018

intend to commence two further developments in 2017 – the £71 million Nickelodeon-anchored leisure scheme at intu

Lakeside and the £74 million extension and enclosure of Barton Square at intu Trafford Centre

signed The Light cinema to anchor the intu Broadmarsh redevelopment and expect to commit to this £89 million project

later in 2017

near-term committed and pipeline of projects through to the end of 2020 of £679 million

Making the brand count We leverage the strength of our brand to create compelling experiences for our customers

net promoter score, our measure of customer service, running consistently high at around 70

intu Experiences, our dedicated promotions business, generated income of £8 million in the period, which is in line with

the first half of 2016 (£21 million annually, equivalent to the rental income of our eighth largest centre)

intu.co.uk, our online shopping platform providing strong editorial content, has seen an 80 per cent year-on-year increase

in visits to our shop pages offering products from 470 retailers

on target to deliver our 2020 environmental objectives ahead of time, including intensity reduction in carbon emissions of

47 per cent since 2010 against our 2020 target of 50 per cent

Seizing the growth opportunity in Spain Our strategy is to create a business of scale through acquisitions and development projects

acquired Madrid Xanadú, one of Spain’s top 10 shopping centres in March 2017, for an agreed price of €530 million, and

announced formation of a joint venture with TH Real Estate for them to take ownership of 50 per cent

completed a €8 million project at intu Asturias developing a previously under-utilised space. The redevelopment opened

successfully in July 2017

signed 23 leases, including nine for the recently completed development at intu Asturias. New lettings of existing units

were 14 per cent above the previous passing rent

occupancy remained strong in our three centres at 98 per cent, with footfall and retailer sales both up by 1 per cent

increases in the market value of existing centres with intu Asturias up 4 per cent and Puerto Venecia, Zaragoza up

3 per cent

strong interest from prospective tenants for the intu Costa del Sol development and progressing discussions with lenders

for development finance for the project

4

Financial strength

Robust capital structure provides capacity to deliver our objectives from a range of funding sources. Since the half year, we have

refinanced a £488 million loan on intu Merry Hill, raised additional finance of £250 million on intu Trafford Centre and imminently

expect to complete the disposal of 50 per cent of Madrid Xanadú. On a pro forma basis, taking into account the above transactions:

cash and available facilities of £920 million (31 December 2016: £922 million)

weighted average debt maturity of 7.1 years, with minimal refinancing until 2021

substantial headroom on our debt covenants. By way of example, a 25 per cent fall in capital values and 10 per cent fall in

income would only require an equity cure of £10 million

With 100 per cent ownership of assets valued at £6.7 billion and high quality income streams, we intend to continue the process of

recycling capital from existing assets to help finance our investment programme.

Guidance for full year

Our guidance for full year like-for-like net rental income is around 0 per cent, at the bottom end of the previously announced range

of 0 to 2 per cent. As previously stated, the precise outcome will be dependent on the timing of letting some of the larger units.

These units, predominantly the former BHS units, are now all in advanced legals but closure of these transactions is slightly behind

our original targets with longer term growth prospects undiminished.

Financial highlights 1

Six months ended Six months ended

30 June 2017 30 June 2016

Net rental income (£m)

2 3 226.2 219.4

Underlying earnings (£m) 98.5 99.5

Property revaluation surplus (£m) 2 3

17.7 5.2

IFRS profit for the period (£m) 122.7 48.1

Underlying earnings per share (pence) 7.3 7.5

Dividend per share (pence) 4.6 4.6

As at As at

30 June 2017 31 December 2016

Market value of investment properties (£m)

2 3 10,121 9,985

Net external debt (£m) 2 3

4,750 4,364

IFRS net assets attributable to owners of intu properties plc (£m) 4,992 4,979 Net asset value per share (diluted, adjusted) (pence) 403 404

Debt to assets ratio (per cent) 2 3

46.9 43.7

Pro forma debt to assets ratio (per cent) 2 4

45.8 n/a

1 Please refer to glossary for definition of terms.

2 Including Group’s share of joint ventures.

3 See other information section for reconciliations between presented figures and IFRS figures.

4 Pro forma for intu Merry Hill refinancing, additional £250 million loan on intu Trafford Centre and disposal of 50 per cent of Madrid Xanadú.

Our results for the period show stable underlying earnings and property valuation:

net rental income increased by £7 million from the impact of acquisitions, partially offset by like-for-like net rental income

reducing by 1.5 per cent, in line with our previous guidance and against a strong comparative of +7.5 per cent, including

non-recurring items, in the first half of 2016

underlying earnings of £99 million, broadly unchanged from the first half of 2016

like-for-like property values remained stable in the period with a total surplus of £18 million

profit for the period of £123 million has increased by £75 million primarily from the change in value of derivative financial

instruments offset by 2016 gains on the sale of Equity One and acquisition of remaining 50 per cent of intu Merry Hill

underlying earnings per share similar to 2016 at 7.3 pence (six months ended 30 June 2016: 7.5 pence) with interim

dividend unchanged

net asset value per share (diluted, adjusted) of 403 pence (31 December 2016: 404 pence), delivering a total financial

return of 2.1 per cent

on a pro forma basis, taking into account the transactions since the period end – the refinancing of intu Merry Hill, the

additional £250 million loan on intu Trafford Centre and the imminent disposal of 50 per cent of Madrid Xanadú – the debt

to assets ratio is 45.8 per cent and cash and available facilities are £920 million (31 December 2016: £922 million)

5

OPERATING REVIEW

Optimising asset performance

Group valuation

The like-for-like valuation surplus on our investment property, including the Group’s share of joint ventures, was 0.2 per cent

(£20.3 million) in the period, closely following the IPD monthly retail index which reported a 0.6 per cent increase

(2016: intu +0.0 per cent; IPD down 4.7 per cent).

Our like-for-like valuation surplus reflects improvements in retail and leisure mix along with the tightening supply of vacant units

driving increases in expected future rental values.

The total valuation surplus in the period was £17.7 million, including the impact of developments, as set out in the table below.

The weighted average nominal equivalent yield at 30 June 2017 was 4.92 per cent, a reduction of 10 basis points in the period,

reflecting our asset management initiatives, reducing vacancy and long average unexpired lease terms. Based on the gross

portfolio value, the net initial yield “topped-up” for the expiry of rent free periods was 4.33 per cent, a reduction of 12 basis points in

the period.

On a like-for-like basis, ERV increased by 0.4 per cent in the period, compared with the IPD index which indicated a 0.2 per cent

increase in the period.

First half Second half First half

2017 2016 2016

Group1 revaluation surplus (like-for-like) +0.2% -0.6% +0.6%

IPD2 capital growth +0.6% -3.5% -1.1%

Group1 weighted average nominal equivalent yield 4.92% 5.02% 5.01%

Change in Group nominal equivalent yield -10bp +1bp -13bp

IPD2 equivalent yield shift -7bp +25bp +4bp

Group1 “topped-up” net initial yield (EPRA) 4.33% 4.45% 4.49%

Group1 change in like-for-like ERV +0.4% +0.1% -0.1%

IPD2 change in rental value index +0.2% +0.3% +0.5%

1 Including Group’s share of joint ventures.

2 IPD monthly index, retail.

6

The table below shows the main components of the Group’s £17.7 million overall valuation surplus:

Market value Like-for-like

30 June 31 December Surplus/ Surplus/

2017 2016 (deficit) (deficit)

£m £m £m %

intu Lakeside 1,395.0 1,375.0 10.4 1

Intu Chapelfield 305.1 296.3 9.5 3

intu Trafford Centre 2,324.0 2,312.0 9.4 –

intu Potteries 162.5 169.0 (8.0) (5)

intu Braehead 533.1 546.2 (12.0) (2)

Other UK like-for-like 4,845.7 4,802.0 0.5 – Total UK like-for-like 9,565.4 9,500.5 9.8 –

Spain like-for-like 353.2 331.0 10.5 3

Redevelopments 202.2 153.2 (3.6) n/a Investment and development property

including Group’s share of joint ventures 10,120.8 9,984.7 16.7 n/a

Acquisition: Madrid Xanadú (asset held for sale) 462.8 – 1.0 n/a Total 10,583.6 9,984.7 17.7 n/a

intu Lakeside: completion of new leases and renewals on expiry adds certainty to the income streams going forward as

well as providing evidence for growth in future rental levels

intu Chapelfield: strong investment demand for prime centres with limited vacant units and strong tenant mix

intu Trafford Centre: new lettings continue to drive forward rental tone

intu Potteries: pressure on long-term rental values has impacted the centre’s value

intu Braehead: continuation of the less buoyant occupier and investment market in Scotland has resulted in a reduction in

value of this centre

Spain: limited vacant space and strong operating metrics increase the rental value potential of intu Asturias and Puerto

Venecia, Zaragoza (see below – seizing the growth opportunity in Spain – for further details)

Group like-for-like net rental income

Like-for-like net rental income was 1.5 per cent lower than the same period in 2016 due to non-recurring rental items in the first half

of 2016 not repeating and the impact of the closure of BHS which was fully income producing in the first half of 2016, partially offset

by rental growth from new lettings and rent reviews, analysed as follows:

First half First half

2017 2016

% % Rent reviews, improved letting and turnover income +2.5% +2.3%

Capital investment +0.5% +0.9%

Vacancy impact -0.2% +1.9%

Units closed for redevelopment -2.1% –

Other letting activity (e.g. bad debt; surrender premiums) -2.2% +2.4% Total like-for-like net rental income -1.5% +7.5%

Our guidance for full year like-for-like net rental income is around 0 per cent, at the bottom end of the previously announced range

of 0 to 2 per cent. As previously stated, the precise outcome will be dependent on the timing of letting some of the larger units.

These units, predominantly the former BHS units, are now in advanced legals but closure of these transactions is slightly behind

our original targets with longer term growth prospects undiminished. We expect the reletting of the former BHS units to increase

the rents on these units by around 15 per cent in aggregate.

7

UK operating metrics

First half Full year First half

2017 2016 2016

Occupancy 95.9% 96.0% 96.1%

- of which, occupied by tenants trading in administration 0.3% 0.5% 1.3%

Leasing activity

- number, new rent 80, £17m 187, £35m 82, £16m

- new rent relative to previous passing 7% above 4% above 7% above

Footfall -0.5% +1.3% +1.3%

Retailer sales (like-for-like centres) -2.1% +0.2% +0.2%

Rent to estimated sales (exc. anchors and major space users) 12.4% 12.2% 12.5%

Occupancy is 95.9 per cent, in line with 31 December 2016 and 30 June 2016. Five UK centres now have occupancy of 98 per

cent or above.

We agreed 80 new long-term leases in the period, amounting to £17 million new annual rent, at an average of 7 per cent above

previous passing rent (like-for-like units) and in line with valuers’ assumptions. Retailers continue to focus on increasing their space

in prime, high footfall retail destinations. Significant activity in the period includes:

key fashion retailers upsizing to optimise their offering and configuration, including Next and River Island at intu Merry Hill

aspirational and international brands continuing to recognise the attraction of destination shopping centres, with Hugo

Boss and Guess joining the line up at intu Metrocentre, Tesla and Victoria’s Secret at intu Milton Keynes, Tag Heuer

opening its first store in the West Midlands at intu Merry Hill and Paul Smith opening its first Manchester store at

Manchester Arndale

traditional retail park tenants introducing smaller format stores in our prime high footfall locations. This includes Decathlon

at intu Uxbridge, taking part of the former BHS unit, and Sharps Bedrooms at intu Lakeside, intu Eldon Square and intu

Broadmarsh

84 new shops opened or refitted in our UK centres in the first half of 2017, around 3 per cent of our 2,800 units. Tenants have

invested around £41 million in these stores, a significant demonstration of their commitment to our centres.

We settled 117 rent reviews in the period for new rents totalling £27 million, an average uplift of 8 per cent on the previous rents.

Footfall was 0.5 per cent lower than the same period in 2016. The closure of the Sainsbury’s unit for redevelopment at intu Merry

Hill and the short-term impact on our Manchester centres following the terrorist attack in the city have impacted the period.

Excluding these, other centres were 0.4 per cent ahead of 2016. This is ahead of the ShopperTrak measure of UK national retail

footfall which is down by 2.7 per cent for the same period.

Estimated retailer sales in our centres were down 2.1 per cent in the period. The ratio of rents to estimated sales for standard units

remained stable in the period at 12.4 per cent.

The difference between annual property income (see glossary) of £490 million and ERV of £569 million represents £38 million from

vacant units and reversion of £41 million, 8 per cent, from rent reviews and lease expiry. Of the 8 per cent reversion, 1 per cent is

only realisable on expiry of leases with over 10 years remaining (e.g. anchor units), leaving 7 per cent realisable from other lease

expiries and rent reviews.

The weighted average unexpired lease term is 7.3 years (31 December 2016: 7.7 years). 89 per cent of our top 40 tenants, over 50

per cent of the rent roll, have a below average risk profile according to Experian Delphi bands, illustrating the quality and longevity

of our income streams.

8

Delivering UK developments

In the period we spent £99 million on capital expenditure. This included £40 million on intu Watford, £32 million on the acquisition

of additional properties (all currently income generating) as part of site assembly for future projects, £6 million on planning and

enabling works for developments and £21 million on active asset management projects, including the new Travelodge hotel at intu

Lakeside and the Next flagship store at intu Metrocentre.

Looking ahead, we are progressing our near-term pipeline of £679 million through to the end of 2020. This, along with a further

£1.3 billion of opportunities over the next 10 years provides a robust platform for organic growth delivering value-enhancing

returns.

Near-term pipeline

Our UK development pipeline through to the end of 2020 amounts to £679 million.

Cost to completion

£m Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 Committed – intu Watford 116 39 77 – –

Committed – intu Trafford Centre 74 6 44 24 –

Committed – intu Lakeside 64 10 50 4 –

Committed – active asset management 67 47 18 2 – Total committed 321 102 189 30 – Pipeline – acquisition/creation of additional space 96 – 12 32 52

Pipeline – active asset management 153 31 55 42 25 Total pipeline 249 31 67 74 77 Development – intu Broadmarsh 89 – 37 36 16

Development – intu Milton Keynes (phase 1) 20 – – 10 10 Total development 109 – 37 46 26 Total UK 679 133 293 150 103

We are committed to spending £321 million:

at intu Watford we remain on target with our £180 million extension expected to open in Autumn 2018. The development

continues at pace with the steel structure nearing completion. The 380,000 sq ft project, anchored by Debenhams and

Cineworld, is two-thirds let by space with Superdry and Hollywood Bowl exchanged in the period. The cost to completion

of this project is £116 million, and as previously stated, the project is expected to deliver a return on cost of 6 to 7 per

cent, including 1 to 2 per cent from the existing centre

at intu Trafford Centre we are planning to enclose the courtyard at Barton Square and enable trading from two levels. The

project is expected to cost £74 million and will add 110,000 sq ft of additional retail space as well as moving the existing

retail profile of Barton Square away from bulky goods. The construction is expected to start in early 2018, once the key

anchor tenant is signed, and deliver a return of 6 to 7 per cent

at intu Lakeside we have committed to the £71 million leisure extension in the period. This 180,000 sq ft project is

expected to deliver a return of 6.5 per cent and has over 90 per cent of the space either pre-let or in solicitors’ hands, with

Nickelodeon and Hollywood Bowl exchanged. We have commenced the enabling works, with £64 million of cost

remaining to completion

other active asset management projects total £67 million and include the completion of ancillary property acquisitions at

intu Merry Hill, the Halle Place restaurant redevelopment at Manchester Arndale and the creation of flagship stores for

Next at intu Metrocentre and intu Merry Hill. These projects are expected to deliver returns of between 6 and 10 per cent

Our pipeline of planned projects amounts to £249 million:

extending the space of existing centres by developing non-income producing areas and acquiring certain adjacent

properties is expected to cost £96 million. This includes the leisure extension at intu Merry Hill which forms part of our

strategy for repositioning the centre. This project is expected to have similar returns to the leisure extension at intu

Lakeside

other active asset management projects at the feasibility stage amount to £153 million and are across all centres. We

have the flexibility to start these projects when we have the required level of pre-lets and expect them to deliver similar

returns to those that we have committed to

9

Extensions and redevelopments to which we have not yet committed are expected to cost £109 million. The majority of this relates

to the redevelopment of intu Broadmarsh which is expected to cost £89 million and deliver a stabilised initial yield of around 7 per

cent. In the period, we have signed The Light cinema to anchor the scheme and we would expect to have the required level of pre-

lets and completed detailed design to enable us to commit to this by the end of the year. The remaining £20 million is the

commencement of phase one of the redevelopment of space at intu Milton Keynes, the planning approval of which has now been

reinstated after the successful outcome of a public inquiry.

Future opportunities

Beyond 2020, we continue to work on securing the required planning approvals and tenant demand to start £1.3 billion of projects

which we would expect to deliver stabilised initial yields of around 7 per cent. We have the required planning approvals for

extensions to intu Lakeside, intu Victoria Centre, intu Braehead and intu Milton Keynes and are at earlier stages of the approval

process for the extension at Cribbs Causeway.

Funding

We will fund our near-term pipeline from cash and available facilities and from recycling capital to deliver superior returns. Pro

forma cash and available facilities at 30 June 2017 were £920 million. Further recycling potential lies in the introduction of partners

into some of our centres, although this would have a short-term impact on earnings through the development phase.

In addition, we expect to raise finance on near-term projects, such as the intu Watford extension, as they complete to fund future

opportunities.

Making the brand count

As the role of a shopping centre operator becomes ever more specialised, the steps we have taken following the rebranding have

positioned us well to ensure our centres remain relevant for both customers and retailers. To ensure the highest quality and the

ability to deliver initiatives quickly, it is important that we control and manage all our space directly.

The first step of this was to bring all staff in-house and ensure we deliver the best customer service. In addition, we took control of

all our commercialisation within the malls, through intu Experiences, to control the quality and quantity of our mall, promotional and

media activity. Finally, we embraced the multichannel world of retail introducing a transactional website through intu Digital.

Overall, our scale, expertise and insight along with our in-house teams ensure we offer the best customer service and experience

in an ever evolving multichannel world.

Customer service

Our focus on putting the customer first is embedded in our culture, with our net promoter score, a measure of customer service,

running consistently high at around 70. Pleasingly, the range of scores across centres is narrowing as we are able to roll-out best

practices across the portfolio.

intu Experiences

Curation of the customer experience is a key element of our role in managing shopping centres. Having an in-house team

delivering nationwide immersive brand partnerships, mall commercialisation and advertising is crucial in ensuring everything meets

our quality standards and is complementary to the asset strategy for each centre.

An example of this end to end control is through the large format digital screens we are introducing to centres, providing new

income streams. We own all these screens and in many instances produce the content in an area of growth for us.

Similarly, choosing the brands we work with promotionally is important in delivering the right messages. Through the Easter

holidays we furthered our collaboration with Nick Jr., Nickelodeon’s pre-school television channel, adding augmented reality

functionality to our in-centre app to deliver a new family experience to our customers.

We can also focus on innovations and are working with Virgin StartUp on ‘Foodpreneur’, a competition to find aspiring food

entrepreneurs, and we have launched intu Accelerate, looking for innovative ideas in the retail and leisure market through a 10

week incubation programme.

intu Digital

The attraction of our digital offering through our premium content publisher and shopping platform, intu.co.uk, saw an increase of

over 50 per cent in online sales for retailers in the first six months of 2017.

We recorded an increase in website visits in the period of 2 per cent on the previous year. Visits to centre specific pages showing

the likes of opening times are reducing as search engines provide more of this basic information. However, we are seeing year-on-

year growth of over 80 per cent in visits to our shopping platform which offers product comparison from 470 retailers. Key to this

growth is our online marketing to the 2.5 million individuals on our active marketing database and over one million social media

audience.

Commitment to the community

We are performing strongly against our 2020 environmental targets, set against a 2010 base line, with a 47 per cent intensity

reduction in carbon emissions (target 50 per cent), 100 per cent of waste diverted from landfill of which 74 per cent is recycled

(targets 99 per cent and 75 per cent respectively) and a 14 per cent water intensity reduction (target 10 per cent).

10

Our people are crucial to what we do and in 2017 we have achieved the internationally recognised accreditation Investors in

People gold standard across all intu branded centres. This highly regarded achievement defines what it takes to lead, support and

manage people well for sustainable results.

Seizing the growth opportunity in Spain

Our Spanish strategy is to create a business of scale through acquisitions and our pipeline of development projects. Concentrating

on the top 10 key catchments, we aim to establish a market leading position in the country through ownership and management of

prime shopping resorts. We own and manage three of Spain’s top 10 shopping centres and have four development sites with the

most advanced project being intu Costa del Sol, near Málaga.

Acquisition

In March 2017, we acquired Madrid Xanadú, one of Spain’s top 10 shopping centres, for an agreed price of €530 million. The

centre has many of the key retailers, including El Corte Ingles, all of the Inditex fascias, Primark and Apple, along with a strong

leisure offering of Spain’s only indoor ski slope, cinema, bowling and soon to open aquarium and Nickelodeon theme park. Footfall

is 13 million, with a potential catchment of four million people living within a 30 minute drive time. There is good reversionary

potential over the medium term, with further growth opportunity from key asset management initiatives which will enhance the

centre’s status as a truly regional retail and leisure resort, drawing visitors from a wider catchment.

Further, in May 2017, we announced the formation of a joint venture with TH Real Estate for them to take ownership of 50 per cent

of Madrid Xanadú based on the original acquisition price. This is expected to complete imminently.

Operational performance

The occupancy of our Spanish centres is 98 per cent, with Puerto Venecia and Madrid Xanadú both 98 per cent and intu Asturias

97 per cent.

We agreed 23 new long-term lettings in the period, amounting to over €1 million new annual rent, at an average of 14 per cent

above previous passing rent (like-for-like units) and ahead of valuers’ assumptions. New names to our centres included Quiz, Levis

and Pandora.

In the period we have completed a redevelopment of a previously underutilised area at intu Asturias to introduce a supermarket

and new retail units which has opened with one unit remaining to be let. The development has impacted footfall and sales for the

centre in the first six months of the year as the work continued, but this has picked up strongly since opening. Excluding this

impact, footfall and sales increased in aggregate by around 1 per cent at the other two centres.

We have increased the value of the centres owned throughout the period with our share of Puerto Venecia, Zaragoza, valued at

€256 million, an increase of 3 per cent, and our share of intu Asturias increased by 4 per cent, to €146 million. The investment

market in Spain remains strong with continued demand for quality shopping centres.

Near-term pipeline

Cost to completion

£m Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 Committed 4 3 – 1 –

Pipeline 40 5 5 15 15

intu Costa del Sol 470 – 98 186 186 Total 514 8 103 202 201

We are committed to spend £4 million, mainly at intu Asturias, and have a pipeline of proposed projects of £40 million through to

the end of 2020. These are across all three centres and focus on enhancing the resort content of each centre.

Our plan for intu Costa del Sol, near Málaga, is to develop a shopping resort of around 230,000 sq. m. to target the three million

residents and 10 million annual tourists to the region. We have received the required planning approval from the local

(Torremolinos) town hall and the final approval from the regional government could be received by the end of the year. We have

strong interest from potential tenants and would anticipate being on site in the second half of 2018.

The total cost of the development is expected to be around €750 million, including the €82 million already incurred by intu, and

deliver a stabilised initial yield of around 7 per cent. We have previously included this project on the basis of introducing a partner

to the project at an early stage, however our current plan is to develop alone and fund through bank and other finance, introducing

a partner at a later stage.

Future opportunities

We continue to develop plans at the three other sites in Valencia, Palma and Vigo, with intu Valencia being the most likely to follow

intu Costa del Sol.

11

TOP PROPERTIES

Annual Headline

Market Size Number property rent ABC1

value (sq. ft. 000) Ownership of stores income ITZA customers Key stores

Super-regional centres intu Trafford Centre

£2,324m 1,973 100% 228 £94.6m £435 66% Debenhams, Topshop, Selfridges, John Lewis, Next, Apple, Ted Baker, Victoria’s Secret, Odeon, Legoland Discovery Centre, H&M, Hamleys, Marks & Spencer, Zara, Sea Life

intu Lakeside £1,395m 1,435 100% 249 £52.9m £355 66% House of Fraser, Debenhams, Marks & Spencer, Topshop, Zara, Primark, Vue, Hamleys, Victoria’s Secret

intu Metrocentre

£945m 2,108 90% 317 £48.8m £280 52% House of Fraser, Marks & Spencer, Debenhams, Apple, H&M, Topshop, Zara, Primark, River Island, Odeon

intu Merry Hill £917m 1,671 100% 212 £40.5m £200 48% Marks & Spencer, Debenhams, Primark, Next, Topshop, Asda, Boots, H&M, Odeon

intu Braehead £533m 1,124 100% 123 £27.5m £250* 57% Marks & Spencer, Primark, Apple, Next, H&M, Topshop, Superdry, Sainsbury’s, David’s Bridal

Cribbs Causeway

£240m 1,075 33% 152 £12.5m £305 77% John Lewis, Marks & Spencer, Apple, Next, Topshop, Timberland, Jigsaw, Hobbs, Hugo Boss, H&M

In-town centres intu Derby £461m 1,300 100% 213 £29.3m £110 47% Marks & Spencer, Debenhams,

Sainsbury’s, Next, Boots, Topshop, Cinema de Lux, Zara, H&M

Manchester Arndale

£450m 1,960 48% 250 £21.2m £285 61% Harvey Nichols, Apple, Burberry, Paul Smith, Topshop, Next, Hugo Boss, Superdry, Zara

intu Victoria Centre

£361m 976 100% 114 £18.9m £250 56% House of Fraser, John Lewis, Next, Topshop, River Island, Boots, Urban Outfitters, Superdry

St David’s, Cardiff

£351m 1,391 50% 203 £16.4m £212 71% John Lewis, Debenhams, Marks & Spencer, Apple, Victoria’s Secret, Hugo Boss, H&M, River Island, Hamleys, Primark

intu Watford £336m 726 93% 136 £17.2m £220 83% John Lewis, Marks & Spencer, Apple, Zara, Primark, Next, Lakeland, Lego, H&M, Topshop, New Look

intu Eldon Square

£324m 1,350 60% 140 £16.2m £308 63% John Lewis, Fenwick, Debenhams, Waitrose, Apple, Topshop, Boots, River Island, Next, Marks & Spencer

Annual

Market Size Number property

Value (sq. m. 000) Ownership of stores income Key stores

Spanish centres

Madrid Xanadú

€527m 118** 100% 210 €25.4m El Corte Inglés, Zara, Primark, Apple, H&M, Mango, SnowZone, Cinesa, BriCor, Decathlon

Puerto Venecia, Zaragoza

€256m 119** 50% 202 €12.3m El Corte Inglés, Primark, Ikea, Apple, Decathlon, Cinesa, H&M, Mediamarkt, Zara, Hollister, Toys R Us, Fnac

intu Asturias €146m 75** 50% 146 €8.0m Primark, Zara, H&M, Cinesa, Eroski, Mango, Springfield, Fnac, Mediamarkt, Desigual

*The amount presented is on the Scottish ITZA basis, the English equivalent is £335.

** Excludes owner occupied space.

12

FINANCIAL REVIEW Presentation of information

We account for our interests in joint ventures using the equity method as required by IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements. This means that

the income statement and the balance sheet include single lines for the Group's total share of post-tax profit and the net

investment in joint ventures respectively.

Management review and monitor performance as well as determine the strategy of the business primarily on a proportionately

consolidated basis. This includes the Group’s share of joint ventures on an individual line-by-line basis rather than a post-tax profit

or net investment basis. The figures and commentary presented are consistent with our management approach as we believe this

provides a more meaningful analysis of the Group’s performance. The other information section provides reconciliations of the

income statement and balance sheet between the two bases.

Alternative performance measures are also used to assess the Group’s performance. The significant measures are summarised as

follows:

Alternative performance Rationale measure used Like-for-like amounts Like-for-like amounts are presented as they indicate operating performance as distinct from the

impact of acquisitions or disposals. In respect of property, the like-for-like measure relates to

property which has been owned throughout both periods without significant capital expenditure in

either period, so that income can be compared on a like-for-like basis. For the purposes of

comparison of capital values, this will also include assets owned at the previous reporting period

end but not throughout the prior period. Further analysis is presented in the other information

section and in the operating review.

Net asset value (‘NAV’)

(diluted, adjusted)

NAV (diluted, adjusted) is presented as it is considered to be a key measure of the Group’s

performance. The key difference from EPRA NAV, an industry standard comparable measure, is

the exclusion of interest rate swaps not currently used for economic hedges of debt as, in our view,

this better allows management to review and monitor the Group’s performance. A reconciliation of

NAV (diluted, adjusted) to NAV attributable to owners of intu properties plc as well as EPRA NAV

is provided in note 13(a).

Underlying earnings Underlying earnings is presented as it is considered to be a key measure of the Group’s recurring

income performance and an indication of the extent to which dividend payments are supported by

underlying operations. It excludes property and derivative valuation movements, exceptional items

and related tax. The key difference from EPRA earnings, an industry standard comparable

measure, relates to adjustments in respect of exceptional items where EPRA is prescriptive about

the adjustments that can be made. A reconciliation of underlying earnings to profit for the period

attributable to owners of intu properties plc as well as EPRA earnings is provided in note 12(c).

The underlying profit statement is also presented in full in the other information section.

Overview

Underlying earnings of £98.5 million is marginally down from £99.5 million in the first half of 2016. This reflects the reduction in like-

for-like net rental income in the period, partially offset by the net impact of recent acquisitions and disposals. Underlying earnings

per share of 7.3 pence, a decrease of 3 per cent on the same period in 2016.

Profit for the period attributable to owners of intu properties plc of £127.1 million has increased by £75.6 million, impacted by the

change in fair value of financial instruments, a surplus of £18.7 million (six months ended 30 June 2016: a charge of £130.6

million), as well as a surplus on property valuations of £17.7 million (six months ended 30 June 2016: surplus of £5.2 million),

partially offset by 2016 gains of £74.1 million on the sale of Equity One and £34.8 million on the acquisition of the remaining 50 per

cent of intu Merry Hill.

Net asset value per share of 403 pence is broadly unchanged from 31 December 2016, which when taking account of the dividend

paid in the period of 9.4 pence delivers a total financial return for the six months ended 30 June 2017 of 2.1 per cent.

In March we continued to increase our presence in Spain and strengthen our super prime portfolio, acquiring 100 per cent of

Madrid Xanadú for £453.5 million (€516.8 million). As part of this we arranged a €265 million loan facility, with a 2022 maturity. In

May we announced the formation of a joint venture with TH Real Estate for them to take ownership of 50 per cent of Madrid

Xanadú based on the original acquisition price. This transaction is expected to complete imminently. As a result, in accordance

with IFRS, the net assets of Madrid Xanadú have been classified as held for sale in the balance sheet.

13

Our financing metrics remain strong mainly due to our continued refinancing activity. In the period, we issued and refinanced £366

million of debt, including the refinancing of intu Milton Keynes in February and financing of the acquisition of Madrid Xanadú in

March. Our debt to assets ratio of 46.9 per cent (31 December 2016: 43.7 per cent) remains below our target maximum level of 50

per cent. Our interest cover ratio of 1.93x has decreased slightly in the year (31 December 2016: 1.97x) with satisfactory headroom

above our target minimum level of 1.60x. At 30 June 2017 we had cash and available facilities of £566.9 million which have

reduced in the period due to the acquisition of Madrid Xanadú (31 December 2016: £922.3 million).

Since the period end we have completed the refinancing of intu Merry Hill with a £488 million loan, have secured an additional

£250 million facility on intu Trafford Centre and imminently expect to complete the disposal of 50 per cent of Madrid Xanadú. On a

pro forma basis, we have a debt to assets ratio of 45.8 per cent and cash and available facilities of £920 million.

Income statement

Six months ended 30 June

2017 2016

Group Group

Share of including including

joint share of joint share of joint

Group ventures ventures ventures

£m £m £m £m

Underlying earnings 98.5 – 98.5 99.5

Adjusted for:

Revaluation of investment and development property 9.2 8.5 17.7 5.2

Gain on acquisition of businesses – – – 34.8

Loss on disposal of subsidiaries (0.9) – (0.9) –

(Loss)/gain on sale of other investments – (0.3) (0.3) 74.1

Administration expenses – exceptional (1.7) – (1.7) (1.3)

Exceptional finance costs (12.2) – (12.2) (12.4)

Change in fair value of financial instruments 18.1 0.6 18.7 (130.6)

Tax on the above (0.3) 1.5 1.2 (16.7)

Share of joint ventures’ items 9.9 (9.9) – –

Share of associates’ items 4.0 – 4.0 (2.4)

Non-controlling interests in respect of the above 2.5 (0.4) 2.1 1.3 Profit for the period attributable to owners of

intu properties plc 127.1 – 127.1 51.5

Underlying earnings per share (pence) 7.3p n/a 7.3p 7.5p

Underlying earnings of £98.5 million is broadly unchanged from £99.5 million in the first half of 2016, the key movements of which

are shown in the chart below. Underlying earnings per share of 7.3 pence, a decrease of 3 per cent on the same period in 2016.

14

Underlying earnings (£m)

Net rental income increased £6.8 million primarily due to the acquisition of Madrid Xanadú in March 2017 and the acquisition of the

remaining 50 per cent of intu Merry Hill in June 2016, partially offset by the impact of the disposal of intu Bromley in December

2016 and the slight reduction in like-for-like net rental income in the period.

Like-for-like net rental income decreased by £3.3 million, 1.5 per cent, driven by non-recurring rental items in the first half of 2016

and the impact of the closure of BHS which was fully income producing in the first half of 2016, partially offset by rental growth from

new lettings and rent reviews (see operating review).

Net finance costs have increased by £5.7 million primarily due to debt relating to the acquisition of Madrid Xanadú in March 2017,

the acquisition of the remaining 50 per cent of intu Merry Hill in June 2016 and the £375 million convertible bonds issued in

November 2016.

The profit for the period attributable to owners of intu properties plc is £127.1 million, an increase on the £51.5 million reported for

the six months ended 30 June 2016. This was primarily due to the change in fair value of financial instruments, a surplus of £18.7

million (six months ended 30 June 2016: a charge of £130.6 million), as well as a surplus on property valuations of £17.7 million

(six months ended 30 June 2016: surplus of £5.2 million), partially offset by 2016 gains of £74.1 million on the sale of Equity One

and £34.8 million on the acquisition of the remaining 50 per cent of intu Merry Hill.

Our investment in joint ventures contributed £18.4 million to the profit of the Group (six months ended 30 June 2016: £17.6 million)

including £8.5 million to underlying earnings (six months ended 30 June 2016: £12.1 million) and a gain on property valuations of

£8.5 million (six months ended 30 June 2016: £8.8 million).

As detailed in the table below, our net rental income margin has reduced to 88 per cent primarily due to higher void costs from the

closure of the former BHS units. Property operating expenses largely comprise car park operating costs and the Group’s

contribution to shopping centre marketing programmes. Our ratio of total costs to income, as calculated in accordance with EPRA

guidelines, remains low at 15.0 per cent (see other information section).

Six months Six months

ended ended

30 June 30 June

2017 2016

£m £m

Gross rental income 268.5 258.8

Head rent payable (10.2) (13.0) 258.3 245.8

Net service charge expense and void rates (14.5) (11.0)

Bad debt and lease incentive write-offs (1.4) (1.0)

Property operating expense (16.2) (14.4) Net rental income 226.2 219.4 Net rental income margin 87.6% 89.3% EPRA cost ratio (excluding direct vacancy costs) 15.0% 14.1%

15

Balance sheet

30 June 31 December

2017 2016

Group Group

Group Share of including including

balance joint share of joint share of joint

sheet ventures ventures ventures

£m £m £m £m

Investment and development property 9,322.5 746.2 10,068.7 9,944.5

Investment in joint ventures 603.1 (603.1) – –

Investment in associates and other investments 86.6 – 86.6 80.7

Net external debt (4,605.7) (144.4) (4,750.1) (4,364.1)

Derivative financial instruments (351.8) (1.9) (353.7) (380.0)

Assets and associated liabilities

classified as held for sale 230.7 – 230.7 –

Other assets and liabilities (230.2) 6.1 (224.1) (234.7) Net assets 5,055.2 2.9 5,058.1 5,046.4

Non-controlling interest (63.2) (2.9) (66.1) (67.6) Attributable to shareholders 4,992.0 – 4,992.0 4,978.8

Fair value of derivative financial instruments 351.8 1.9 353.7 380.0

Other adjustments 79.2 (1.9) 77.3 76.3

Effect of dilution 2.6 – 2.6 2.6 Net assets (diluted, adjusted) 5,425.6 – 5,425.6 5,437.7

NAV per share (diluted, adjusted) (pence) 403p – 403p 404p

The Group’s net assets attributable to shareholders are £4,992.0 million, an increase from £4,978.8 million at 31 December 2016,

while net assets (diluted, adjusted) are £5,425.6 million, a decrease from £5,437.7 million at 31 December 2016.

Net asset value per share (pence)

NAV per share (diluted, adjusted) at 30 June 2017 decreased from 31 December 2016 to 403 pence with the key movements

shown in the chart above. This was driven principally by underlying earnings in the period of 7.3 pence, offset by the final dividend

for 2016 of 9.4 pence paid in the period.

Investment and development property has increased by £124.2 million primarily due to capital expenditure of £108.6 million, and a

surplus on revaluation of £17.7 million. The acquisition of Madrid Xanadú in March has been subsequently classified as an asset

held for sale and therefore does not impact this movement.

Our net investment in joint ventures is £603.1 million at 30 June 2017 (31 December 2016: £587.6 million), which includes the

Group’s share of net assets, on an equity accounted basis, of £375.1 million (31 December 2016: £355.4 million) and loans to joint

ventures of £228.0 million (31 December 2016: £232.2 million). The increase in net investment in joint ventures primarily reflects

the Group’s share of their profit in the period.

16

Investments in associates and other investments of £86.6 million primarily represent our interests in India, which comprises a 32

per cent interest in Prozone (£48.7 million), a shopping centre developer listed on the Indian stock market, and a direct interest in

Empire (£21.0 million), owner and operator of a shopping centre in Aurangabad. See notes 16 and 17 for further details.

Net external debt of £4,750.1 million has increased by £386.0 million primarily from funding our acquisition of Madrid Xanadú and

capital expenditure in the period. Cash including the Group’s share of joint ventures has reduced by £2.7 million to £288.9 million

and gross debt has increased by £383.3 million to £5,039.0 million.

Derivative financial instruments comprise the fair value of the Group’s interest rate swaps. The net liability at 30 June 2017 is

£353.7 million, a decrease of £26.3 million in the period, with the UK 10-year bond yield increasing marginally from 1.24 per cent to

1.26 per cent. Cash payments in the year totalled £21 million, £12 million of which has been classified as an exceptional finance

cost as it relates to payments in respect of unallocated interest rate swaps. The balance of the payments has been included as

underlying finance costs as it relates to ongoing interest rate swaps used to hedge debt.

As previously detailed, we have a number of interest rate swaps, entered into some years ago, which are unallocated due to a

change in lenders’ practice. At 30 June 2017 these interest rate swaps have a market value liability of £239.6 million (31 December

2016: £253.2 million). It is estimated that we will be required to make cash payments on these interest rate swaps of £13 million in

the second half of 2017, £28 million in 2018, reducing to below £18 million per annum in 2021.

Assets and associated liabilities classified as held for sale of £230.7 million relate to Madrid Xanadú. In May we announced the

formation of a joint venture with TH Real Estate for them to take ownership of 50 per cent of Madrid Xanadú based on the original

acquisition price. This transaction is expected to complete imminently. As a result, in accordance with IFRS, the net assets of

Madrid Xanadú have been classified as held for sale in the balance sheet.

The non-controlling interest at 30 June 2017 relates primarily to our partner’s 40 per cent stake in intu Metrocentre.

We are exposed to foreign exchange movements on our overseas investments and our policy is to ensure that the net exposure to

foreign currency is less than 10 per cent of the Group’s net assets attributable to shareholders. At 30 June 2017 the exposure, pro

forma for the 50 per cent disposal of Madrid Xanadú, is 8 per cent, higher than the 7 per cent at 31 December 2016 due to our

increased exposure in Spain from the acquisition of Madrid Xanadú.

Cash flow Six months ended Six months ended

30 June 2017 30 June 2016

£m £m

Group cash flow as reported

Cash flows from operating activities 67.9 73.0

Cash flows from investing activities (539.7) (244.8)

Cash flows from financing activities 466.9 140.6

Foreign currency movements 0.1 1.1 Net decrease in Group cash and cash equivalents (4.8) (30.1)

During the six months ended 30 June 2017 cash and cash equivalents decreased by £4.8 million.

Cash flows from operating activities of £67.9 million are £5.1 million lower than 2016, primarily due to the timing of payments.

Cash flows from investing activities reflect cash outflows for our acquisition of Madrid Xanadú of £446.3 million and capital

expenditure paid during the period of £91.3 million.

Cash flows from financing activities include net debt drawdowns of £586.4 million primarily to fund our acquisition of Madrid

Xanadú, partially offset by dividends paid in cash during the period of £117.8 million.

17

Financing

Debt structure

We have carried out significant refinancing activity in recent years which has resulted in diversified sources of funding, including

secured bonds plus syndicated bank debt secured on individual or pools of assets, with limited or no recourse from the borrowing

entities to other Group companies outside of these arrangements. Our corporate-level debt remains limited to the Revolving Credit

Facility (‘RCF’) as well as the £375 million and £300 million convertible bonds.

During the period we undertook the following financing activities:

agreed a new £140 million facility secured against intu Milton Keynes, replacing the previous £125 million loan, maturing

in 2019

agreed a €265 million facility in connection with the acquisition of Madrid Xanadú, maturing in 2022

Since the period end, we have completed the refinancing of intu Merry Hill with a £488 million secured facility, now maturing in

2024, and have secured an additional £250 million loan on intu Trafford Centre, maturing in 2022. Based on the current share

price, it is likely the £300 million convertible bonds, maturing in 2018, will be repaid in cash. The chart below illustrates that we

have no major refinancing requirement due until 2021.

Debt maturity (£m)

Debt measures

30 June 31 December

2017 2016

Debt to assets 45.8%

1 43.7%

Interest cover 1.93x 1.97x

Weighted average debt maturity 7.1 years1 7.1 years

2

Weighted average cost of gross debt 4.3%1 4.3%

Proportion of gross debt with interest rate protection 99%1 88%

Cash and available facilities £919.6m1 £922.3m

1 Pro forma for intu Merry Hill refinancing, additional £250 million loan on intu Trafford Centre and disposal of 50 per cent of Madrid Xanadú.

2 Pro forma for intu Milton Keynes refinancing, completed February 2017.

On a pro forma basis, our debt to assets ratio has increased to 45.8 per cent since 31 December 2016 due to the acquisition of

Madrid Xanadú and remains below our target maximum level of 50 per cent. Our weighted average debt maturity is unchanged at

7.1 years and the weighted average cost of gross debt is unchanged at 4.3 per cent (excluding the RCF).

Interest cover of 1.93x has decreased slightly during the period and remains above our target minimum level of 1.60x.

We use interest rate swaps to fix interest obligations, reducing any cash flow volatility caused by changes in interest rates. The

proportion of debt with interest rate protection on a pro forma basis has increased in the period to 99 per cent within our policy

range of between 75 per cent and 100 per cent.

18

Covenants

Full details of the debt financial covenants are included in the other information section of this report. We are in compliance with all

of our covenants and regularly stress test them for changes in capital values and income. A 25 per cent fall in property values and

a 10 per cent reduction in income would only require a £10 million equity cure.

Capital commitments

We have an aggregate commitment to capital projects of £325.0 million at 30 June 2017 (31 December 2016: £257.0 million).

In addition to the committed expenditure, we have an identified uncommitted pipeline of active management projects, major

extensions and developments that may become committed over the next three years (see operating review).

Other information

Tax policy position

Like all Real Estate Investment Trusts (‘REIT’s), tax on property operating profits is paid at shareholder level to the UK

Government rather than by the Group. REIT status brings with it the requirement to operate within the rules of the REIT regime

(see glossary for further information).

The Group’s principle of good governance extends to our responsible approach to tax. We look to minimise the level of tax

risk and at all times seek to comply fully with our regulatory and other tax obligations and to act in a way which upholds intu’s

reputation as a responsible corporate citizen by regularly carrying out risk reviews, seeking pre-clearance from HMRC in complex

areas and actively engaging in discussions regarding proposed changes in the taxation system that might affect the Group. It

remains important to our stakeholders that our approach to tax is aligned to the long-term values and strategy of the Group. The

Chief Financial Officer is the Executive Committee member with executive responsibility for tax matters, with close involvement of

executive and senior management.

We pay tax directly on overseas earnings, any UK non-property income under the REIT rules, business rates and transaction taxes

such as stamp duty land tax. In the six months ended 30 June 2017 the total of such payments to tax authorities was £13.1 million,

of which £11.6 million was in the UK and £1.5 million in Spain. In addition, we also collect VAT, employment taxes and withholding

tax on dividends for HMRC and the Spanish tax authorities.

Dividends

The Directors are recommending an interim dividend of 4.6 pence per share in line with the 2016 interim dividend. A scrip dividend

alternative may be offered. Details of the apportionment between the PID and non-PID elements per share will be confirmed in

due course.

19

MARKET REVIEW

UK investment market

Low interest rates and a weakened value of sterling mean that prime shopping centres continue to attract interest from international

investors. Whilst activity was limited in the first half of 2017 as the UK general election took centre stage, good levels of demand

remain for quality assets in the UK’s liquid and transparent market for large shopping centres.

However, a flight to quality has ensured prime yields remain stable as investors look at the quality and longevity of income streams

coupled with rental growth potential in a market where new supply, by way of development, remains low. Against this, yields on

secondary assets are drifting outwards due to investors perceiving a relatively poor outlook for such assets.

UK consumer market

Uncertainty from the early stages of discussions of the UK’s exit from the EU is creating a mixed picture on the state of the UK

consumer. Unemployment continues at record low levels which should in turn drive earnings growth. However, the increase in

inflation from the weakening of sterling after the EU referendum vote is causing prices to rise faster than wages at the moment

which impacts consumers’ disposable income. This is reflected in the Asda benchmark index of household income which has

shown a reduction of 2 per cent since December 2016.

Looking further ahead, the Bank of England’s forecasts suggest that wage growth will overtake inflation as we go into 2018.

Consumer confidence, as measured by GfK, had remained broadly stable over the majority of the first half of 2017, but has

dropped following the UK general election in June 2017, reflecting negative sentiment about consumers’ personal finances and

expectations for the wider economy.

These mixed messages have not had a material effect on non-food retail spending, which remains unchanged against 2016 (British

Retail Consortium like-for-like non-food retail index).

Occupier market

Retail is one of the UK’s most dynamic and flexible industries which has always been able to adapt quickly in fast-changing

environments. Retailers are facing both economic and structural challenges and the winners will be those with the right stores in

the right places, who align their online and instore strategies and who give customers an experience they cannot get elsewhere.

Economic pressures include the impact on retailers’ cost bases from the weakness of sterling, business rates revaluations and

increases in the national living wage. The current squeeze on disposable income from higher inflation may add more pressure.

Structurally, retailers are still evolving in relation to the opportunities and costs of online shopping with those possessing a strong

store network benefitting from click and collect. This enables them to use their existing efficient distribution networks to reduce

delivery costs and convert additional sales when the customer is instore.

Considering the challenges that face them, many retailers are looking at fewer stores, but in the best locations offering high footfall

from a compelling mix of retail, catering and leisure. This demand is spread across all unit sizes with the powerhouse fashion

brands taking larger flagships and introducing their sub-brands, traditional big box retailers refining their offer to smaller shopping

centre size stores, new international and aspirational lifestyle brands successfully entering the shopping centre market and the

continued growth in new leisure concepts. Whilst the rapid expansion of food and beverage operators in the last few years is

slowing, leisure operators are increasingly looking at shopping centres for their expansion plans.

With our prime portfolio of shopping centres, offering compelling customer experiences and a sophisticated online offer, we are

well positioned to meet the demands of this changing world, including the trend of online retailers taking physical stores, although

this is still at an early stage.

Retailer administrations in the period remained at relatively low levels. Jones the Bootmaker (three units), 99p Stores (one unit)

and Handmade Burger Co. (four units) entered administration in the period and amount in total to 0.4 per cent of intu’s rent roll.

Spanish market

In recent years, the Spanish economy has had significant growth making it one of Europe’s fastest growing economies. Forecasts

suggest that this is expected to continue in 2017 with its GDP growth expected to be one of the highest of the major European

economies. For the consumer, unemployment is at its lowest level for several years and consumer confidence at its highest. This in

turn benefits retail sales which are further enhanced by record levels of tourists.

The investment market remains strong with continuing investor confidence in Spanish real estate supported by an economy that is

growing. With the return of bank financing, the weight of money in the market looking to invest in quality assets has continued to

strengthen the market. Due to lack of development in recent years, prime regional shopping centres are a scarce asset class which

is reflected in good demand.

20

PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

intu’s Board has responsibility for establishing the Group’s appetite for risk on the balance of potential risks and returns, and has

overall responsibility for identifying and managing risks. The Board has updated its assessment of the principal risks facing the

Group, including those that would impact the business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity.

Principal risks and uncertainties are identified under five key headings: property market; operations; financing; developments and

acquisitions; and brand. These are discussed in detail below. A principal risk is one which has the potential to significantly affect

the Group’s strategic objectives, financial position or future performance and includes both internal and external factors. We

monitor movements in likelihood and severity such that the risks are appropriately mitigated in line with the Group’s risk appetite.

The risk profile for the six months ended 30 June 2017 has remained broadly in line with the year ended 31 December 2016 with

no significant new risks identified nor substantial changes in existing risks. Uncertainty in the UK economy and real estate markets

following the EU referendum vote last year (‘Brexit’) has not resulted in any material adverse impacts, although recent UK general

election results may create some further uncertainty. Following recent events we remain focused on our approach to terrorism and

cybersecurity.

Key to strategic objectives: Change in level of risk:

1) Optimising asset performance Remained the same

2) Delivering UK developments

3) Making the brand count

4) Seizing the growth opportunity in Spain

Risk and impact Mitigation 2017 commentary Property market Strategic objectives affected: 1,2,3,4 Macro-economic

Weakness in the macro-

economic environment

could undermine rental

income levels and

property values, reducing

return on investment and

covenant headroom

focus on prime and super prime assets together

with their upgrading

covenant headroom monitored and stress-

tested

make representation on key policies, for

example business rates

large-scale national marketing events across

centres to attract footfall

leveraging the strength of the intu brand to

attract and retain aspirational retailers

continued geographic diversification by

increasing Spanish presence

Likelihood of macro-economic weakness

continues to be a risk with political

uncertainty in the UK and Brexit

arrangements not yet detailed

like-for-like property values remaining

stable in the period

substantial covenant headroom

no significant near-term debt maturities

and average unexpired term

unchanged at 7.1 years

long-term lease structures with average

unexpired term of 7.3 years

Purchase of Madrid Xanadú for

€516.8m

Retail environment

Failure to react to

changes in the retail

environment could

undermine intu’s ability to

attract customers and

tenants

active management of tenant mix including

letting of former BHS units

regular monitoring of tenant strength and

diversity

upgrading assets to meet demand, for example,

increased leisure offering

Tell intu customer feedback programme helps

identify changes in customer preferences

work closely with retailers

digital strategy that embraces technology and

digital customer engagement. This enables intu

to engage in and support multichannel retailing,

and to take the opportunities offered by

ecommerce

Likelihood and severity of potential impact

was monitored closely in the first half of

2017 with intu’s strategy continuing to

deliver solid footfall numbers and

occupancy

significant progress on planning and

pre-letting of near-term pipeline with a

focus on leisure

continuing digital investment to improve

relevance as shopping habits change

occupancy unchanged at 95.9 per cent

footfall continues to be ahead of

benchmark

committed to the £71m intu Lakeside

leisure extension

21

PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES (continued)

Risk and impact Mitigation 2017 commentary Operations Strategic objectives affected: 1,3 Health and safety

Accidents or system

failure leading to financial

and/or reputational loss

strong business process and procedures,

including compliance with OHSAS 18001,

supported by regular training and exercises

annual audits of operational standards and

equipment carried out internally and by external

consultants

culture of visitor, staff and contractor safety

crisis management and business continuity

plans in place and tested

retailer liaison and briefings

appropriate levels of insurance

staff succession planning and development in

place to ensure continued delivery of world

class service

health and safety managers or coordinators in

all centres

Likelihood of potential impact has not

changed significantly during the first half of

2017, however severity impacted by new

enforcement structure

maintenance of OHSAS 18001

certification, demonstrating consistent

health and safety management process

and procedures across the portfolio

work continuing towards achieving

additional accreditations with focus on

ISO 14001

award of the golden status from the

Royal Society for the Prevention of

Accidents

Cybersecurity

Loss of data and

information or failure of

key systems resulting in

financial and/or

reputational loss

data and cybersecurity strategies

regular testing programme and cyber scenario

exercise and benchmarking

appropriate levels of insurance

crisis management and business continuity

plans in place and tested

data committee and data protection officer in

place

monitoring of regulatory environment and best

practice

cybersecurity assessment performed by

external consultancy and full action plan in

place (programme of works)

managing of supply chain and service providers

who hold intu data

Likelihood has increased with increased

reliance on operational and third party

systems and data, and with the number of

recent high profile hacks. Severity of

potential impact has reduced by significant

development of tools and controls. We

have experienced attempted cybersecurity

hacks which have not resulted in any data

loss or major operational impacts. We

continue to prioritise on the cybersecurity

programme of works

ongoing Group-wide cybersecurity

project with investment in tools,

consultancy and staff to mitigate impact

of threats from evolving cybersecurity

landscape

Terrorism

Terrorist incident at an

intu centre or another

major shopping centre

resulting in loss of

consumer confidence

with consequent impact

on lettings and rental

growth

strong business process and procedures,

supported by regular training and exercises,

designed to adapt and respond to changes in

risk levels

extraordinary pre-planned operational

responses to changes in national threat level

annual audits of operational standards and

physical protection measures carried out

internally and by external agencies

culture of visitor, staff and contractor safety

crisis management and business continuity

plans in place and tested with involvement of

multiple external agencies

retailer liaison and briefings

appropriate levels of insurance

strong relationships and frequent liaison with

police, NaCTSO and other agencies

NaCTSO approved to train staff in counter-

terrorism awareness programme

internal head of security appointed

Overall likelihood and severity of potential

impact unchanged. In May 2017 we

enacted our operational plan for the period

of increased threat level. The threat level

was subsequently reduced to the prior

threat level

national threat level remains at Severe

major scenario exercises now

completed at all five intu managed

super regional shopping centres with

involvement of multiple external

agencies

operating procedures in place for the

introduction of further security

measures if required

22

PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES (continued)

Risk and impact Mitigation 2017 commentary Financing Strategic objectives affected: 2,4

Availability of funds

Reduced availability of

funds could limit liquidity,

leading to restriction of

investing and operating

activities and/or increase

in funding cost

funding strategy regularly reported to the Board

with current and projected funding position

effective treasury management aimed at

balancing long debt maturity profile and

diversification of sources of finance

consideration of financing plans including

potential for recycling of capital before

commitment to transactions and developments

strong relationships with lenders, shareholders

and partners

focus on prime and super prime assets

Macro-economic events during 2017, and

the uncertainty caused by them, mean the

increased risk of reduced availability

remains. However, severity of potential

impact unchanged from 2016. Regular

refinancing activity continuing to evidence

the availability of funding

new €265m loan facility secured on

Madrid Xanadú

introduction of joint venture partner into

Madrid Xanadú to complete in the

second half of 2017

£140m refinancing of intu Milton

Keynes

£488m refinancing of intu Merry Hill

£250m additional financing on intu

Trafford Centre

Developments and acquisitions Strategic objectives affected: 2,4

Developments

Developments fail to

create shareholder value

Capital Projects Committee reviews detailed

appraisals before and monitors progress during

significant projects

fixed price construction contracts for

developments agreed with clear apportionment

of risk

significant levels of pre-lets exchanged prior to

scheme development

Likelihood and severity of potential impact

have remained unchanged in 2017 as the

Group has progressed work on its

development pipeline

at intu Watford works are on schedule

to hit all key milestones

intu Lakeside leisure development

committed

detailed appraisal work and significant

pre-lets ahead of starting major

development projects

Acquisitions

Acquisitions fail to create

shareholder value

research and third party due diligence

undertaken for transactions

local partner, advisors and experienced staff in

Spain with specialist market knowledge

where appropriate, investment risk reduced

through financing and joint venture investments

Likelihood and severity of potential impact

have remained unchanged

substantial due diligence process

undertaken before acquisition of

Madrid Xanadú

Brand Strategic objectives affected: 1,2,3,4 Integrity of the brand

The integrity of the brand

is damaged leading to

financial and/or

reputational loss

intellectual property protection

strong guidelines for use of brand

strong underlying operational controls and crisis

management procedures

ongoing training programme and reward and

recognition schemes designed to embed brand

values and culture throughout the organisation

traditional and digital media monitoring and

analysis

Tell intu and shopper view customer feedback

programmes

Likelihood and severity of potential impact

unchanged in the first half of 2017

continuing media interest in intu and

our commentaries and opinions on the

business and wider landscape

ongoing development of brand in Spain

net promoter score consistently high at

around 70 for the period

23

DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT The Directors are responsible for preparing the interim report and condensed consolidated set of interim financial statements

(‘interim financial statements’), in accordance with applicable law and regulations. The Directors confirm that, to the best of their

knowledge:

the interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting, as adopted by

the European Union; and

the interim report includes a fair review of the information required by Sections DTR 4.2.7R and DTR 4.2.8R of the

Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook of the United Kingdom’s Financial Services Authority.

The operating and financial reviews refer to important events which have taken place in the period.

The principal risks and uncertainties facing the business are referred to in the operating and financial reviews.

Related party transactions are set out in note 27 of the interim financial statements.

Details, including biographies, of all current Directors are maintained on the intu properties plc website: intugroup.co.uk.

On behalf of the Board

David Fischel

Chief Executive Matthew Roberts

Chief Financial Officer 27 July 2017

24

Independent review report to intu properties plc

Report on the condensed consolidated interim financial statements Our conclusion

We have reviewed intu properties plc's condensed consolidated interim financial statements (the "interim financial statements") in

the interim report of intu properties plc for the 6 month period ended 30 June 2017. Based on our review, nothing has come to our

attention that causes us to believe that the interim financial statements are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance

with International Accounting Standard 34, ‘Interim Financial Reporting’, as adopted by the European Union and the Disclosure

Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook of the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority.

What we have reviewed

The interim financial statements comprise:

the consolidated balance sheet as at 30 June 2017;

the consolidated income statement and consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the period then ended;

the consolidated statement of changes in equity for the period then ended;

the consolidated statement of cash flows for the period then ended; and

the explanatory notes to the interim financial statements.

The interim financial statements included in the interim report have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting

Standard 34, ‘Interim Financial Reporting’, as adopted by the European Union and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency

Rules sourcebook of the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority.

As disclosed in note 1 to the interim financial statements, the financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation

of the full annual financial statements of the Group is applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as

adopted by the European Union.

Responsibilities for the interim financial statements and the review Our responsibilities and those of the Directors

The interim report, including the interim financial statements, is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the Directors. The

Directors are responsible for preparing the interim report in accordance with the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules

sourcebook of the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority.

Our responsibility is to express a conclusion on the interim financial statements in the interim report based on our review. This

report, including the conclusion, has been prepared for and only for the company for the purpose of complying with the Disclosure

Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook of the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority and for no other purpose. We

do not, in giving this conclusion, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is

shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.

What a review of interim financial statements involves

We conducted our review in accordance with International Standard on Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410, ‘Review of

Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity’ issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in

the United Kingdom. A review of interim financial information consists of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for

financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures.

A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) and,

consequently, does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be

identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.

We have read the other information contained in the interim report and considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements

or material inconsistencies with the information in the interim financial statements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chartered Accountants London 27 July 2017 a) The maintenance and integrity of the intu properties plc website is the responsibility of the Directors; the work carried out by the

auditors does not involve consideration of these matters and, accordingly, the auditors accept no responsibility for any changes

that may have occurred to the interim financial statements since they were initially presented on the website.

b) Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from

legislation in other jurisdictions.

25

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT (unaudited) For the six months ended 30 June 2017

Six months Six months Year

ended ended ended

30 June 30 June 31 December

2017 2016 2016

Notes £m £m £m

Revenue 4 307.3 285.5 594.3 Net rental income 4 210.5 193.6 406.1

Net other income 5 0.6 0.4 0.6

Revaluation of investment and development property 14 9.2 (3.6) (78.0)

Gain on acquisition of businesses – 34.8 34.6

Loss on disposal of subsidiaries (0.9) – (0.3)

Gain on sale of other investments – 74.1 74.1

Administration expenses – ongoing (20.1) (18.1) (37.8)

Administration expenses – exceptional 6 (1.7) (0.9) (2.5) Operating profit 197.6 280.3 396.8 Finance costs 7 (105.1) (98.6) (202.9)

Finance income 8 4.9 10.6 14.9

Other finance costs 9 (15.1) (15.4) (37.9)

Change in fair value of financial instruments 18.1 (127.6) (16.3) Net finance costs (97.2) (231.0) (242.2) Profit before tax, joint ventures and associates 100.4 49.3 154.6

Share of post-tax profit of joint ventures 15 18.4 17.6 32.1

Share of post-tax profit/(loss) of associates 16 4.4 (2.1) 1.6 Profit before tax 123.2 64.8 188.3 Current tax 10 (0.2) – –

Deferred tax 10 (0.3) (16.7) (16.5) Taxation (0.5) (16.7) (16.5) Profit for the period 122.7 48.1 171.8

Attributable to:

Owners of intu properties plc 127.1 51.5 182.7

Non-controlling interests (4.4) (3.4) (10.9) 122.7 48.1 171.8

Basic earnings per share 12 9.5p 3.9p 13.7p

Diluted earnings per share 12 8.9p 3.3p 11.2p Details of underlying earnings are presented in the underlying profit statement in the other information section. Underlying earnings per share are shown in note 12(c).

26

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (unaudited) For the six months ended 30 June 2017

Six months Six months Year

ended ended ended

30 June 30 June 31 December

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m Profit for the period 122.7 48.1 171.8 Other comprehensive income

Items that may be reclassified subsequently to the income statement:

Revaluation of other investments (note 17) (0.1) (0.3) 0.4

Exchange differences 11.4 21.3 31.6

Tax relating to components of other comprehensive income – – (0.2) Total items that may be reclassified subsequently to the income statement 11.3 21.0 31.8 Transferred to the income statement:

On sale of other investments – (77.0) (77.0)

Tax on sale of other investments – 16.7 16.7 Total transferred to the income statement – (60.3) (60.3) Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the period 11.3 (39.3) (28.5) Total comprehensive income for the period 134.0 8.8 143.3

Attributable to:

Owners of intu properties plc 138.4 12.2 154.2

Non-controlling interests (4.4) (3.4) (10.9) 134.0 8.8 143.3

27

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (unaudited) As at 30 June 2017

As at As at As at

30 June 31 December 30 June

2017 2016 2016

Notes £m £m £m

Non-current assets

Investment and development property 14 9,322.5 9,212.1 9,403.0

Plant and equipment 8.6 7.6 6.7

Investment in joint ventures 15 603.1 587.6 574.3

Investment in associates 16 69.7 65.2 56.8

Other investments 17 16.9 15.5 0.6

Goodwill 4.0 4.0 4.0

Derivative financial instruments 0.2 – –

Trade and other receivables 102.3 99.1 91.4 10,127.3 9,991.1 10,136.8 Current assets

Assets classified as held for sale 26 559.5 – –

Trade and other receivables 145.2 123.4 116.2

Cash and cash equivalents 18 250.4 254.7 245.5 955.1 378.1 361.7 Total assets 11,082.4 10,369.2 10,498.5

Current liabilities

Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for sale 26 (328.8) – –

Trade and other payables (307.9) (281.0) (292.0)

Current tax liabilities (0.5) (0.3) (0.4)

Borrowings 19 (17.4) (142.4) (16.7)

Derivative financial instruments (51.5) (37.0) (34.2) (706.1) (460.7) (343.3) Non-current liabilities

Borrowings 19 (5,019.4) (4,520.2) (4,775.3)

Derivative financial instruments (300.5) (340.7) (432.5)

Other payables (1.2) (1.2) (3.0) (5,321.1) (4,862.1) (5,210.8) Total liabilities (6,027.2) (5,322.8) (5,554.1)

Net assets 5,055.2 5,046.4 4,944.4

Equity

Share capital 21 677.5 677.5 672.3

Share premium 21 1,327.4 1,327.4 1,303.1

Treasury shares (39.2) (40.8) (43.1)

Other reserves 355.6 344.3 333.5

Retained earnings 2,670.7 2,670.4 2,603.5 Attributable to owners of intu properties plc 4,992.0 4,978.8 4,869.3

Non-controlling interests 63.2 67.6 75.1

Total equity 5,055.2 5,046.4 4,944.4 .

28

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (unaudited) For the six months ended 30 June 2017

Attributable to owners of intu properties plc

Non-

Share Share Treasury Other Retained controlling Total

capital premium shares reserves earnings Total interests equity

£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m

At 1 January 2017 677.5 1,327.4 (40.8) 344.3 2,670.4 4,978.8 67.6 5,046.4 Profit/(loss) for the period – – – – 127.1 127.1 (4.4) 122.7

Other comprehensive income:

Revaluation of other investments

(note 17) – – – (0.1) – (0.1) – (0.1)

Exchange differences – – – 11.4 – 11.4 – 11.4 Total comprehensive income

for the period – – – 11.3 127.1 138.4 (4.4) 134.0 Dividends (note 11) – – – – (126.2) (126.2) – (126.2)

Share-based payments – – – – 2.2 2.2 – 2.2

Acquisition of treasury shares – – (1.2) – – (1.2) – (1.2)

Disposal of treasury shares – – 2.8 – (2.8) – – – – – 1.6 – (126.8) (125.2) – (125.2) At 30 June 2017 677.5 1,327.4 (39.2) 355.6 2,670.7 4,992.0 63.2 5,055.2

29

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (unaudited) (continued) For the year ended 31 December 2016

Attributable to owners of intu properties plc

Non-

Share Share Treasury Other Retained controlling Total

capital premium shares reserves earnings Total interests equity

£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m At 1 January 2016 672.3 1,303.1 (43.3) 372.8 2,671.5 4,976.4 78.5 5,054.9 Profit/(loss) for the year – – – – 182.7 182.7 (10.9) 171.8

Other comprehensive income:

Revaluation of other

investments – – – 0.4 – 0.4 – 0.4

Exchange differences – – – 31.6 – 31.6 – 31.6

Tax relating to components

of other comprehensive

income (note 10) – – – 16.5 – 16.5 – 16.5

Transferred to income

statement on sale of other

investments – – – (77.0) – (77.0) – (77.0) Total comprehensive

income for the year – – – (28.5) 182.7 154.2 (10.9) 143.3 Ordinary shares issued 5.2 24.3 – – – 29.5 – 29.5

Dividends (note 11) – – – – (182.5) (182.5) – (182.5)

Share-based payments – – – – 1.9 1.9 – 1.9

Acquisition of treasury shares – – (0.7) – – (0.7) – (0.7)

Disposal of treasury shares – – 3.2 – (3.2) – – – 5.2 24.3 2.5 – (183.8) (151.8) – (151.8) At 31 December 2016 677.5 1,327.4 (40.8) 344.3 2,670.4 4,978.8 67.6 5,046.4

30

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (unaudited) (continued) For the six months ended 30 June 2016

Attributable to owners of intu properties plc

Non-

Share Share Treasury Other Retained controlling Total

capital premium shares reserves earnings Total interests equity

£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m

At 1 January 2016 672.3 1,303.1 (43.3) 372.8 2,671.5 4,976.4 78.5 5,054.9 Profit/(loss) for the period – – – – 51.5 51.5 (3.4) 48.1

Other comprehensive income:

Revaluation of other

investments – – – (0.3) – (0.3) – (0.3)

Exchange differences – – – 21.3 – 21.3 – 21.3

Tax relating to components of

other comprehensive income

(note 10) – – – 16.7 – 16.7 – 16.7

Transferred to income

statement on sale of other

investments – – – (77.0) – (77.0) – (77.0) Total comprehensive income

for the period – – – (39.3) 51.5 12.2 (3.4) 8.8 Ordinary shares issued – – – – – – – –

Dividends (note 11) – – – – (121.1) (121.1) – (121.1)

Share-based payments – – – – 2.4 2.4 – 2.4

Acquisition of treasury shares – – (0.6) – – (0.6) – (0.6)

Disposal of treasury shares – – 0.8 – (0.8) – – – – – 0.2 – (119.5) (119.3) – (119.3) At 30 June 2016 672.3 1,303.1 (43.1) 333.5 2,603.5 4,869.3 75.1 4,944.4

31

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited) For the six months ended 30 June 2017

Six months Six months Year

ended ended ended

30 June 30 June 31 December

2017 2016 2016

Notes £m £m £m

Cash generated from operations 23 180.3 163.0 355.9

Interest paid (113.0) (97.6) (233.0)

Interest received 1.1 7.4 8.5

Taxation (0.5) 0.2 – Cash flows from operating activities 67.9 73.0 131.4 Cash flows from investing activities

Purchase and development of property, plant and equipment (91.3) (57.0) (120.9)

Sale of property 3.4 – –

Acquisition of businesses net of cash acquired 25 (446.3) (398.8) (405.5)

Cash transferred to assets classified as held for sale (12.7) – –

Sale of other investments – 201.9 201.9

Additions of other investments (1.5) – (14.1)

Disposal of subsidiaries net of cash sold with business – – 80.5

Loan advances to joint ventures 15 (2.3) (0.7) (1.2)

Loan repayments by joint ventures 15 10.1 7.5 12.7

Distributions from joint ventures 15 0.9 2.3 3.2 Cash flows from investing activities (539.7) (244.8) (243.4) Cash flows from financing activities

Issue of ordinary shares – 0.1 0.3

Acquisition of treasury shares (1.2) (0.6) (0.7)

Cash transferred (to)/from restricted accounts (0.5) 0.2 (0.8)

Borrowings drawn 596.6 588.2 962.9

Borrowings repaid (10.2) (333.8) (720.4)

Equity dividends paid (117.8) (113.5) (152.6) Cash flows from financing activities 466.9 140.6 88.7

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 0.1 1.1 1.4 Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (4.8) (30.1) (21.9)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 18 251.7 273.6 273.6 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 18 246.9 243.5 251.7

32

NOTES (unaudited) 1 Basis of preparation

The condensed consolidated set of interim financial statements (‘interim financial statements’) for the six months ended

30 June 2017 are unaudited and do not constitute statutory financial statements within the meaning of s434 of the Companies Act

2006. The interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules

sourcebook of the Financial Conduct Authority and with IAS 34 as adopted by the European Union.

The comparative information presented for the year ended 31 December 2016 is not the Group’s financial statements for that year.

Those financial statements have been reported on by the Group’s auditors and delivered to the registrar of companies. The

auditors’ opinion on those financial statements was unqualified and did not contain an emphasis of matter paragraph or a

statement made under Section 498 (2) or (3) of the Companies Act 2006.

The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Group’s financial statements for the year ended

31 December 2016 which have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) as adopted

by the European Union.

Use of estimates and assumptions

The preparation of interim financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of

estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the interim financial statements

and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates are based on

management’s best knowledge of the amount, event or actions, actual results ultimately may differ from those estimates. In

preparing the interim financial statements, the areas of significant judgement made by management in applying the Group

accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were the same as those applied to the consolidated financial

statements as at and for the year ended 31 December 2016. In particular, significant judgement is required in the use of estimates

and assumptions in the valuation and accounting for investment and development property and derivative financial instruments.

Going concern

The Group prepares regular forecasts and projections which include sensitivity analysis taking into account a number of downside

risks to the forecast including reasonably possible changes in trading performance and asset values and assesses the potential

impact of these on the Group’s liquidity position and available resources.

In preparing the most recent projections, factors taken into account include £288.9 million of cash (including the Group’s share of

cash in joint ventures of £38.5 million) and £278.0 million of undrawn facilities at 30 June 2017. The Group’s weighted average

debt maturity of 7.1 years and the relatively long-term and stable nature of the cash flows receivable under tenant leases were also

factored into the forecasts.

After reviewing the most recent projections and the sensitivity analysis, the Directors consider it appropriate to continue to adopt

the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the Group’s interim financial statements.

2 Accounting policies

The accounting policies applied are consistent with those of the Group’s statutory financial statements for the year ended

31 December 2016 as set out on pages 114 to 117 of the Annual report, as amended when relevant to reflect the adoption of new

standards, amendments and interpretations which became effective in the period. These amendments have not had an impact on

the financial statements.

Taxes on income in interim periods are accrued using tax rates expected to be applicable to total annual earnings.

3 Seasonality and cyclicality

There is no material seasonality or cyclicality impacting interim financial reporting.

33

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 4 Segmental reporting

Operating segments are determined based on the strategic and operational management of the Group. The Group is primarily a

shopping centre-focused business and has two reportable operating segments being the United Kingdom and Spain. Although

management review and monitor the performance of the business principally on a centre-by-centre basis, the operating segments

are consistent with the strategic and operational management of the Group.

As mentioned in the financial review, management review and monitor the business primarily on a proportionately consolidated

basis. As such, the segmental analysis has been prepared on a proportionately consolidated basis.

The key driver of underlying earnings which is used to measure performance is net rental income. An analysis of net rental income

is provided below:

Six months ended 30 June 2017

Group including

share of joint ventures Less share of Group

UK Spain Total joint ventures total

£m £m £m £m £m

Rent receivable 252.7 15.8 268.5 (18.5) 250.0

Service charge income 55.7 3.8 59.5 (3.7) 55.8

Facilities management income from joint ventures 1.2 – 1.2 0.3 1.5 Revenue 309.6 19.6 329.2 (21.9) 307.3

Rent payable (10.2) – (10.2) 0.5 (9.7)

Service charge costs (64.5) (2.9) (67.4) 4.1 (63.3)

Facilities management costs recharged to joint ventures (1.2) – (1.2) (0.3) (1.5)

Other non-recoverable costs (21.8) (2.4) (24.2) 1.9 (22.3) Net rental income 211.9 14.3 226.2 (15.7) 210.5

Six months ended 30 June 2016

Group including

share of joint ventures Less share of Group

UK Spain Total joint ventures total

£m £m £m £m £m

Rent receivable 251.2 7.6 258.8 (29.5) 229.3

Service charge income 54.2 1.6 55.8 (5.8) 50.0

Facilities management income from joint ventures 3.5 – 3.5 2.7 6.2 Revenue 308.9 9.2 318.1 (32.6) 285.5

Rent payable (13.0) – (13.0) 0.6 (12.4)

Service charge costs (61.4) (1.6) (63.0) 6.5 (56.5)

Facilities management costs recharged to joint ventures (3.5) – (3.5) (2.7) (6.2)

Other non-recoverable costs (18.5) (0.7) (19.2) 2.4 (16.8) Net rental income 212.5 6.9 219.4 (25.8) 193.6

34

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 4 Segmental reporting (continued)

Year ended 31 December 2016

Group including

share of joint ventures Less share of Group

UK Spain Total joint ventures total

£m £m £m £m £m

Rent receivable 516.7 15.9 532.6 (48.1) 484.5

Service charge income 107.6 3.5 111.1 (9.5) 101.6

Facilities management income from joint ventures 5.1 – 5.1 3.1 8.2 Revenue 629.4 19.4 648.8 (54.5) 594.3

Rent payable (25.4) – (25.4) 1.1 (24.3)

Service charge costs (123.5) (3.7) (127.2) 10.6 (116.6)

Facilities management costs recharged to joint ventures (5.1) – (5.1) (3.1) (8.2)

Other non-recoverable costs (42.3) (1.8) (44.1) 5.0 (39.1) Net rental income 433.1 13.9 447.0 (40.9) 406.1

There were no significant transactions within net rental income between operating segments.

Profit for the period of £122.7 million (six months ended 30 June 2016: £48.1 million, year ended 31 December 2016: £171.8

million) includes £112.7 million in respect of the UK (six months ended 30 June 2016: £41.5 million, year ended 31 December

2016: £150.7 million) and £10.0 million in respect of Spain (six months ended 30 June 2016: £6.6 million, year ended 31 December

2016: £21.1 million).

An analysis of investment and development property, capital expenditure and revaluation surplus/(deficit) is provided below:

Investment and Revaluation

development property Capital expenditure surplus/(deficit)

30 June 31 December Six months ended 30 June

2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

£m £m £m £m £m £m

United Kingdom 9,648.9 9,537.5 99.4 38.3 6.2 (8.5)

Spain 437.8 407.0 9.2 13.1 11.5 13.7 Group including share of joint ventures 10,086.7 9,944.5 108.6 51.4 17.7 5.2

Less share of joint ventures (764.2) (732.4) (4.8) (0.8) (8.5) (8.8) Group 9,322.5 9,212.1 103.8 50.6 9.2 (3.6)

The Group’s geographical analysis of non-current assets is set out below. This represents where the Group’s assets reside and,

where relevant, where revenues are generated. In the case of investments this reflects where the investee is located.

As at As at As at

30 June 31 December 30 June

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

United Kingdom 9,752.4 9,648.6 9,839.3

Spain 304.7 276.7 240.1

India 70.2 65.8 57.4 10,127.3 9,991.1 10,136.8

35

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 5 Net other income

Six months Six months Year

ended ended ended

30 June 30 June 31 December

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

Dividend income 0.4 – –

Management fees 1.8 1.7 3.3

intu Digital (1.6) (1.3) (2.7) Net other income 0.6 0.4 0.6

6 Administration expenses – exceptional

Exceptional administration expenses in the period totalled £1.7 million and relate to corporate transactions, principally the

acquisition of Madrid Xanadú (see note 25). These have been classified as exceptional based on their incidence (see definition in

the glossary).

7 Finance costs

Six months Six months Year

ended ended ended

30 June 30 June 31 December

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

On bank loans and overdrafts 93.8 93.2 189.2

On convertible bonds 9.1 3.7 9.3

On obligations under finance leases 2.2 1.7 4.4

Finance costs 105.1 98.6 202.9

Finance costs of £2.0 million were capitalised in the six months ended 30 June 2017 (six months ended 30 June 2016: £0.6 million,

year ended 31 December 2016: £2.1 million).

8 Finance income

Six months Six months Year

ended ended ended

30 June 30 June 31 December

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

Interest receivable on loans to joint ventures 3.8 10.0 13.4

Other finance income 1.1 0.6 1.5

Finance income 4.9 10.6 14.9

36

NOTES (unaudited) (continued)

9 Other finance costs

Six months Six months Year

ended ended ended

30 June 30 June 31 December

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

Amortisation of Metrocentre compound financial instrument 2.9 2.9 5.9

Cost of termination of derivative financial instruments and other costs1 14.6 13.8 34.7

Foreign currency movements1 (2.4) (1.3) (2.7)

Other finance costs 15.1 15.4 37.9

1 Amounts totalling £12.2 million in the six months ended 30 June 2017 (six months ended 30 June 2016: £12.5 million, year ended 31 December 2016: £32.0 million) are

treated as exceptional items, as defined in the glossary, due to their nature and therefore excluded from underlying earnings (see note 12(c)). These finance costs include

termination of interest rate swaps on repayment of debt, payments on unallocated interest rate swaps, foreign currency movements and other fees.

10 Taxation

Taxation for the period:

Six months Six months Year

ended ended ended

30 June 30 June 31 December

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

UK taxation – current year 0.1 – –

UK taxation – adjustment in respect of prior years – – (0.1)

Overseas taxation 0.1 – 0.1 Current tax 0.2 – – Deferred tax:

On investment and development property 0.3 – –

On other investments – 16.4 (2.3)

On derivative financial instruments – (2.2) 16.4

On other temporary differences – 2.5 2.4 Deferred tax 0.3 16.7 16.5 Total tax charge 0.5 16.7 16.5

37

NOTES (unaudited) (continued)

10 Taxation (continued)

Movements in the provision for deferred tax:

Investment and Other

development Other temporary

property investments differences Total

£m £m £m £m

Deferred tax provision:

At 1 January 2017 – 0.1 (0.1) –

Acquisition of Madrid Xanadú (note 25) 84.5 – (6.8) 77.7

Recognised in the income statement 0.3 – – 0.3

Transferred to held for sale (note 26) (84.8) – 6.8 (78.0) At 30 June 2017 – 0.1 (0.1) –

At 30 June 2017, the Group had unrecognised deferred tax assets calculated at a tax rate of 17 per cent (31 December 2016: 17

per cent, 30 June 2016: 18 per cent) of £43.6 million (31 December 2016: £39.7 million, 30 June 2016: £43.5 million) for surplus

UK revenue tax losses carried forward, £43.9 million (31 December 2016: £45.5 million, 30 June 2016: £61.0 million) for temporary

differences on derivative financial instruments, £0.6 million (31 December 2016: £0.6 million, 30 June 2016: £0.6 million) for

temporary differences on capital allowances and £5.8 million (31 December 2016: £3.4 million, 30 June 2016: £nil) for capital

losses.

In accordance with the requirements of IAS 12 Income Taxes, the deferred tax asset has not been recognised in the Group

financial statements due to uncertainty over the level of profits that will be available in the non-REIT elements of the Group in future

periods.

11 Dividends

Six months Six months Year

ended ended ended

30 June 30 June 31 December

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

Ordinary shares:

Final dividend paid of 9.4 pence per share

(2015: final dividend: 9.1 pence per share) 126.2 121.1 121.1

2016 interim dividend paid of 4.6 pence per share – – 61.4 Dividends paid 126.2 121.1 182.5 Proposed 2017 interim dividend of 4.6 pence per share 62.3

38

NOTES (unaudited) (continued)

12 Earnings per share

(a) Earnings per share

Basic and diluted earnings per share as calculated in accordance with IAS 33 Earnings per Share. All earnings arise from

continuing operations.

Six months ended Six months ended Year ended

30 June 2017 30 June 2016 31 December 2016

Pence Pence Pence

Earnings Shares per Earnings Shares per Earnings Shares per

£m million share £m million share £m million share

Profit for the period

attributable to owners of

intu properties plc 127.1 51.5 182.7

Basic earnings per share

1 127.1 1,343.1 9.5p 51.5 1,332.0 3.9p 182.7 1,333.5 13.7p

Dilutive convertible bonds,

share options and share awards 1.2 94.7 (4.1) 91.4 (21.6) 107.9 Diluted earnings per share 128.3 1,437.8 8.9p 47.4 1,423.4 3.3p 161.1 1,441.4 11.2p 1 The weighted average number of shares used for the calculation of basic earnings per share has been adjusted to remove shares held in the Employee Share Ownership

Plan (‘ESOP’).

(b) Headline earnings per share

Headline earnings per share has been calculated and presented as required by the Johannesburg Stock Exchange listing

requirements.

Six months ended Six months ended Year ended

30 June 2017 30 June 2016 31 December 2016

Gross Net1 Gross Net

1 Gross Net

1

£m £m £m £m £m £m

Basic earnings 127.1 51.5 182.7

Adjusted for:

Revaluation of investment and development property

(note 14) (9.2) (12.0) 3.6 2.3 78.0 71.8

Gain on acquisition of businesses – – (34.8) (34.8) (34.6) (34.6)

Loss on disposal of subsidiaries 0.9 0.9 – – 0.3 0.3

Gain on sale of other investments – – (74.1) (74.1) (74.1) (74.1)

Share of joint ventures’ items (8.2) (8.2) (8.8) (8.8) (14.2) (14.2)

Share of associates’ items (4.0) (4.0) 2.4 2.4 (1.1) (1.1)

Headline earnings/(loss) 103.8 (61.5) 130.8

Dilution2 1.2 (4.1) (21.6)

Diluted headline earnings/(loss) 105.0 (65.6) 109.2 Weighted average number of shares 1,343.1 1,332.0 1,333.5

Dilution2 94.7 91.4 107.9

Diluted weighted average number of shares 1,437.8 1,423.4 1,441.4 Headline earnings/(loss) per share (pence) 7.7p (4.6)p 9.8p Diluted headline earnings/(loss) per share (pence) 7.3p (4.6)p 7.6p 1 Net of tax and non-controlling interests.

2 The dilution impact is required to be included as calculated in note 12(a) even where this is not dilutive for headline earnings per share.

39

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 12 Earnings per share (continued)

(c) Underlying earnings per share

Underlying earnings per share is a non-GAAP measure but has been included as it is considered to be a key measure of the

Group’s recurring performance and an indication of the extent to which dividend payments are supported by underlying operations

(see underlying profit statement in the other information section). Underlying earnings is defined as an alternative performance

measure in the financial review.

Six months ended Six months ended Year ended

30 June 2017 30 June 2016 31 December 2016

Pence Pence Pence

Earnings Shares per Earnings Shares per Earnings Shares per

£m million share £m million share £m million share

Basic earnings per share (note 12a) 127.1 1,343.1 9.5p 51.5 1,332.0 3.9p 182.7 1,333.5 13.7p

Adjusted for:

Revaluation of investment and

development property (note 14) (9.2) (0.7)p 3.6 0.3p 78.0 5.9p

Gain on acquisition of businesses – – (34.8) (2.6)p (34.6) (2.6)p

Loss on disposal of subsidiaries 0.9 0.1p – – 0.3 –

Gain on sale of other investments – – (74.1) (5.6)p (74.1) (5.6)p

Administration expenses

– exceptional (note 6) 1.7 0.1p 0.9 0.1p 2.5 0.2p

Exceptional finance costs (note 9) 12.2 0.9p 12.5 0.9p 32.0 2.4p

Change in fair value of

financial instruments (18.1) (1.4)p 127.6 9.5p 16.3 1.2p

Tax on the above 0.3 – 16.7 1.3p 16.5 1.3p

Share of joint ventures’ items (9.9) (0.7)p (5.5) (0.4)p (12.3) (0.9)p

Share of associates’ items (4.0) (0.3)p 2.4 0.2p (1.1) (0.1)p

Non-controlling interests

in respect of the above (2.5) (0.2)p (1.3) (0.1)p (6.2) (0.5)p Underlying earnings per share 98.5 1,343.1 7.3p 99.5 1,332.0 7.5p 200.0 1,333.5 15.0p

Dilutive convertible bonds,

share options and share awards 1.2 94.7 3.7 91.4 9.3 107.9 Underlying, diluted earnings

per share 99.7 1,437.8 6.9p 103.2 1,423.4 7.3p 209.3 1,441.4 14.5p

A reconciliation from underlying earnings per share to EPRA earnings per share is provided below:

Six months ended Six months ended Year ended

30 June 2017 30 June 2016 31 December 2016

Pence Pence Pence

Earnings Shares per Earnings Shares per Earnings Shares per

£m million share £m million share £m million share

Underlying earnings per share 98.5 1,343.1 7.3p 99.5 1,332.0 7.5p 200.0 1,333.5 15.0p

Adjusted for:

Other exceptional items (2.0) (0.1)p – – (6.5) (0.5)p

Other exceptional tax – – (0.3) – (0.2) –

Share of joint ventures’ items – – (0.4) – (0.4) – EPRA earnings per share 96.5 1,343.1 7.2p 98.8 1,332.0 7.5p 192.9 1,333.5 14.5p

40

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 13 Net assets per share

(a) NAV per share (diluted, adjusted)

NAV per share (diluted, adjusted) is a non-GAAP measure but has been included as it is considered to be a key measure of the

Group’s performance. The key difference from EPRA NAV, an industry standard comparable measure, is the exclusion of interest

rate swaps not currently used for economic hedges of debt as, in our view, this better allows management to review and monitor

the Group’s performance. NAV (diluted, adjusted) is defined as an alternative performance measure in the financial review.

As at 30 June 2017 As at 31 December 2016 As at 30 June 2016

Net NAV per Net NAV per Net NAV per

assets Shares share assets Shares share assets Shares share

£m million (pence) £m million (pence) £m million (pence)

NAV per share attributable to

owners of intu properties plc1 4,992.0 1,343.4 372p 4,978.8 1,343.0 371p 4,869.3 1,332.1 366p

Dilutive convertible bonds,

share options and awards 2.6 3.1 2.6 3.5 10.9 6.9

Diluted NAV per share 4,994.6 1,346.5 371p 4,981.4 1,346.5 370p 4,880.2 1,339.0 364p

Adjusted for:

Fair value of derivative

financial instruments 351.8 26p 377.7 28p 466.7 35p

Deferred tax on investment

and development property

and other investments 0.1 – 0.1 – – –

Share of joint ventures’

items 7.8 1p 7.2 1p 10.3 1p

Non-controlling interest

recoverable balance not

recognised 71.3 5p 71.3 5p 71.3 5p NAV per share (diluted, adjusted) 5,425.6 1,346.5 403p 5,437.7 1,346.5 404p 5,428.5 1,339.0 405p 1 The number of shares used has been adjusted to remove shares held in the ESOP.

A reconciliation from NAV per share (diluted, adjusted) to EPRA NAV per share is provided below:

As at 30 June 2017 As at 31 December 2016 As at 30 June 2016

Net NAV per Net NAV per Net NAV per

assets Shares share assets Shares share assets Shares share

£m million (pence) £m million (pence) £m million (pence)

NAV per share (diluted, adjusted) 5,425.6 1,346.5 403p 5,437.7 1,346.5 404p 5,428.5 1,339.0 405p

Adjusted for:

Swaps not currently used for

economic hedges of debt (239.6) (18)p (236.8) (18)p (316.9) (23)p EPRA NAV per share 5,186.0 1,346.5 385p 5,200.9 1,346.5 386p 5,111.6 1,339.0 382p

41

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 13 Net assets per share

(b) NNNAV per share (diluted, adjusted)

NNNAV per share (diluted, adjusted) is a non-GAAP measure but has been included as it is considered to be an industry standard

comparable measure and is equal to EPRA NNNAV.

As at 30 June 2017 As at 31 December 2016 As at 30 June 2016

Net NAV per Net NAV per Net NAV per

assets Shares share assets Shares share assets Shares share

£m million (pence) £m million (pence) £m million (pence)

NAV per share (diluted,

adjusted) 5,425.6 1,346.5 403p 5,437.7 1,346.5 404p 5,428.5 1,339.0 405p

Fair value of derivative

financial instruments (351.8) (26)p (377.7) (28)p (466.7) (35)p

Excess of fair value of debt

over book value (389.9) (29)p (375.0) (28)p (380.4) (28)p

Deferred tax on investment

and development property

and other investments (0.1) – (0.1) – – –

Share of joint ventures’

items (10.0) (1)p (9.4) (1)p (12.3) (1)p

Non-controlling interests

in respect of the above 23.6 2p 23.4 2p 24.1 2p NNNAV per share (diluted,

adjusted) 4,697.4 1,346.5 349p 4,698.9 1,346.5 349p 4,593.2 1,339.0 343p

14 Investment and development property

£m

At 1 January 2017 9,212.1

Acquisition of Madrid Xanadú (note 25) 461.4

Additions 103.8

Disposals (3.4)

Surplus on revaluation 9.2

Transfer to assets held for sale (note 26) (462.8)

Foreign exchange movements 2.2 At 30 June 2017 9,322.5

A reconciliation to market value is provided below:

As at As at As at

30 June 31 December 30 June

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

Balance sheet carrying value of investment and development property 9,322.5 9,212.1 9,403.0

Tenant incentives included within trade and other receivables 112.8 109.9 104.1

Head leases included within finance leases in borrowings (80.1) (80.2) (89.7) Market value of investment and development property 9,355.2 9,241.8 9,417.4

42

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 14 Investment and development property (continued)

The fair value of the Group’s investment and development property, other than certain development land was determined by

independent external valuers as at 30 June 2017. The valuations are in accordance with the Royal Institution of Chartered

Surveyors (‘RICS’) Valuation – Professional Standards 2014 and were arrived at by reference to market transactions for similar

properties and rent profiles. Fair values for investment properties are calculated using the present value income approach. The

main assumptions underlying the valuations are in relation to rent profile and yields. The valuation methodology is unchanged from

the prior year and is set out in further detail on page 126 of the 2016 Annual report. In respect of development valuations,

deductions are then made for anticipated costs, including an allowance for developer’s profit before arriving at a valuation.

The table in the other information section sets out the market value, yield and occupancy of each of the major investment

properties.

15 Investment in joint ventures

The Group’s principal joint ventures own and manage investment and development property.

St David’s, Puerto intu

Cardiff Venecia Asturias Other Total

£m £m £m £m £m

At 1 January 2017 355.2 119.4 76.0 37.0 587.6 Group’s share of underlying profit 6.5 0.4 1.0 0.6 8.5

Group’s share of other net profit/(loss) (1.9) 6.0 6.0 (0.2) 9.9 Group’s share of profit 4.6 6.4 7.0 0.4 18.4

Distributions – – – (0.9) (0.9)

Loan advances – – – 2.3 2.3

Loan repayments (10.1) – – – (10.1)

Foreign exchange movements – 3.5 2.3 – 5.8 At 30 June 2017 349.7 129.3 85.3 38.8 603.1 Represented by:

Loans to joint ventures 88.3 98.0 34.9 6.8 228.0

Group’s share of net assets 261.4 31.3 50.4 32.0 375.1

43

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 15 Investment in joint ventures (continued)

intu St David’s, Puerto intu

Merry Hill Cardiff Venecia Asturias Other Total

£m £m £m £m £m £m

At 1 January 2016 447.0 368.5 85.9 53.4 37.1 991.9 Group’s share of underlying profit 3.3 7.2 – 0.6 1.0 12.1

Group’s share of other net profit/(loss) (4.3) (1.0) 4.8 6.7 (0.7) 5.5 Group’s share of profit/(loss) (1.0) 6.2 4.8 7.3 0.3 17.6

Distributions (1.0) – – – (1.3) (2.3)

Loan advances – – – – 0.7 0.7

Loan repayments – (7.5) – – – (7.5)

Disposal of joint venture interest (445.0) – – – – (445.0)

Foreign exchange movements – – 11.2 7.2 0.5 18.9 At 30 June 2016 – 367.2 101.9 67.9 37.3 574.3 Represented by:

Loans to joint ventures – 103.5 92.8 33.1 3.5 232.9

Group’s share of net assets – 263.7 9.1 34.8 33.8 341.4

intu St David’s, Puerto intu

Merry Hill Cardiff Venecia Asturias Other Total

£m £m £m £m £m £m

At 1 January 2016 447.0 368.5 85.9 53.4 37.1 991.9 Group’s share of underlying profit 3.3 13.7 0.7 0.8 1.3 19.8

Group’s share of other net profit/(loss) (4.3) (14.3) 19.4 12.9 (1.4) 12.3 Group’s share of profit/(loss) (1.0) (0.6) 20.1 13.7 (0.1) 32.1

Distributions (1.0) – – – (2.2) (3.2)

Loan advances – – – – 1.2 1.2

Loan repayments – (12.7) – – – (12.7)

Disposal of joint venture interest (445.0) – – – – (445.0)

Foreign exchange movements – – 13.4 8.9 1.0 23.3 At 31 December 2016 – 355.2 119.4 76.0 37.0 587.6 Represented by:

Loans to joint ventures – 98.4 95.3 33.9 4.6 232.2

Group’s share of net assets – 256.8 24.1 42.1 32.4 355.4

44

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 16 Investment in associates

£m

At 1 January 2017 65.2

Share of profit of associates 4.4

Foreign exchange movements 0.1 At 30 June 2017 69.7

Investment in associates comprises a 32.4 per cent holding in the ordinary shares of Prozone Intu Properties Limited (‘Prozone’)

and a 26.8 per cent holding in the ordinary shares of Empire Mall Private Limited (‘Empire’). Both companies are incorporated in

India.

As required by IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, the equity method of accounting is applied in accounting for

the Group’s investment in Prozone and Empire. The results of Prozone and Empire for the year to 31 March have been used as 30

June information is not available in time for these interim financial statements. Those results are adjusted to be in line with the

Group’s accounting policies and include the most recent property valuations, determined as at 31 March 2017, by independent

professionally qualified external valuers in line with the valuation methodology described in note 14.

The market price per share of Prozone at 30 June 2017 was INR40 (31 December 2016: INR35, 30 June 2016: INR27), valuing the

Group’s interest at £23.8 million (31 December 2016: £20.3 million, 30 June 2016: £14.6 million) compared to the carrying value of

£48.7 million (31 December 2016: £45.5 million, 30 June 2016: £38.6 million). As the share price of Prozone is lower than its

carrying value, a review of the carrying value has been undertaken. The net assets of Prozone principally comprise investment

property which is included at fair value within the investment in associates line. As with other Group investment property, it is

subject to independent valuation to fair value and that valuation reflects the future cash flows expected to be generated from those

assets. As such the net asset carrying value recorded in the Group’s accounts is deemed to be a reasonable approximation of the

value in use of the business and so no adjustment to that carrying value is considered necessary.

17 Other investments

£m

At 1 January 2017 15.5

Additions 1.5

Revaluation (0.1) At 30 June 2017 16.9

Listed investments are accounted for at fair value using the bid market value at the reporting date.

18 Cash and cash equivalents

As at As at As at

30 June 31 December 30 June

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

Unrestricted cash 246.9 251.7 243.5

Restricted cash 3.5 3.0 2.0 250.4 254.7 245.5

45

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 19 Borrowings

As at As at As at

30 June 31 December 30 June

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

Current

Bank loans and overdrafts – 125.1 –

Commercial mortgage backed securities (‘CMBS’) notes 15.1 14.9 14.7 Current borrowings, excluding finance leases 15.1 140.0 14.7

Finance lease obligations 2.3 2.4 2.0 17.4 142.4 16.7 Non-current

Revolving Credit Facility 2021 362.7 10.0 343.1

CMBS notes 2019 19.8 19.8 19.7

CMBS notes 2022 50.3 50.5 50.7

CMBS notes 2024 87.9 87.8 87.7

CMBS notes 2029 76.2 78.7 81.3

CMBS notes 2033 318.8 325.4 332.3

CMBS notes 2035 191.8 190.6 189.5

Bank loans 2017 – – 167.2

Bank loan 2018 495.8 494.8 588.6

Bank loan 2019 139.6 – –

Bank loans 2020 32.8 32.8 32.7

Bank loan 2021 469.6 468.9 468.3

3.875% bonds 2023 442.9 442.4 441.8

4.125% bonds 2023 478.0 477.5 477.1

4.625% bonds 2028 342.0 341.7 341.4

4.250% bonds 2030 344.9 344.8 344.6

Debenture 2027 228.6 228.4 228.3

2.5% convertible bonds 2018 (note 20) 305.6 308.1 318.5

2.875% convertible bonds 2022 (note 20) 373.6 362.4 – Non-current borrowings, excluding finance leases and Metrocentre

compound financial instrument 4,760.9 4,264.6 4,512.8

Metrocentre compound financial instrument 180.7 177.8 174.8

Finance lease obligations 77.8 77.8 87.7 5,019.4 4,520.2 4,775.3 Total borrowings 5,036.8 4,662.6 4,792.0

Cash and cash equivalents (note 18) (250.4) (254.7) (245.5) Net debt 4,786.4 4,407.9 4,546.5

The fair value of total borrowings as at 30 June 2017 was £5,426.7 million (31 December 2016: £5,037.6 million, 30 June 2016:

£5,172.4 million).

Details of the Group’s net external debt are provided in the other information section.

46

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 20 Convertible bonds

2.875 per cent convertible bonds (‘the 2.875 per cent bonds’)

In 2016 the Group issued £375.0 million 2.875 per cent Guaranteed Convertible Bonds due 2022 at par. Under the terms of the

2.875 per cent bonds, the exchange price is adjusted upon certain events including the payment of dividends by the Company over

a certain threshold. At 30 June 2017 the exchange price was £3.7506 per ordinary share (31 December 2016: £3.7506). These

bonds are designated at fair value through profit or loss and so are presented on the balance sheet at fair value with all gains and

losses taken to the income statement through the change in fair value of financial instruments line. They all remain outstanding at

30 June 2017.

At 30 June 2017, the fair value of the 2.875 per cent bonds was £373.6 million (31 December 2016: £362.4 million). During the six

months ended 30 June 2017, interest of £5.4 million has been recognised on these bonds within finance costs (year ended 31

December 2016: £1.8 million).

2.5 per cent convertible bonds (‘the 2.5 per cent bonds’)

In 2012 the Group issued £300.0 million 2.5 per cent Guaranteed Convertible Bonds due 2018 at par. Under the terms of the

bonds, the exchange price is adjusted upon certain events including the rights issue on 22 April 2014 and the payment of dividends

by the Company. At 30 June 2017 the exchange price was £3.1797 per ordinary share (31 December 2016: £3.2872, 30 June

2016: £3.3401). These bonds are designated at fair value through profit or loss and so are presented on the balance sheet at fair

value with all gains and losses taken to the income statement through the change in fair value of financial instruments line. They all

remain outstanding at 30 June 2017.

At 30 June 2017, the fair value of the 2.5 per cent bonds was £305.6 million (31 December 2016: £308.1 million, 30 June 2016:

£318.5 million). During the six months ended 30 June 2017, interest of £3.7 million has been recognised on these bonds within

finance costs (six months ended 30 June 2016: £3.7 million, year ended 31 December 2016: £7.5 million).

21 Share capital and share premium

Share Share

capital premium

£m £m

Issued and fully paid:

At 31 December 2016 and 30 June 2017: 1,355,040,243 ordinary shares of 50p each

677.5 1,327.4 22 Financial instruments

The table below presents the Group’s financial assets and liabilities recognised at fair value.

As at 30 June 2017

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

£m £m £m £m

Assets

Derivative financial instruments:

– Fair value through profit or loss – 0.2 – 0.2

Available-for-sale investments 15.4 1.5 – 16.9 Total assets 15.4 1.7 – 17.1 Liabilities

Convertible bonds:

– Designated at fair value through profit or loss (679.2) – – (679.2)

Derivative financial instruments:

– Fair value through profit or loss – (352.0) – (352.0) Total liabilities (679.2) (352.0) – (1,031.2)

47

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 22 Financial instruments (continued)

As at 31 December 2016

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

£m £m £m £m

Assets

Available-for-sale investments 15.5 – – 15.5 Total assets 15.5 – – 15.5 Liabilities

Convertible bonds:

– Designated at fair value through profit or loss (670.5) – – (670.5)

Derivative financial instruments:

– Fair value through profit or loss – (377.7) – (377.7) Total liabilities (670.5) (377.7) – (1,048.2)

As at 30 June 2016

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

£m £m £m £m

Assets

Available-for-sale investments 0.6 – – 0.6 Total assets 0.6 – – 0.6 Liabilities

Convertible bonds:

– Designated at fair value through profit or loss (318.5) – – (318.5)

Derivative financial instruments:

– Fair value through profit or loss – (466.7) – (466.7) Total liabilities (318.5) (466.7) – (785.2)

Fair value hierarchy

Level 1: Valuation based on quoted market prices traded in active markets.

Level 2: Valuation techniques are used, maximising the use of observable market data, either directly from market prices or derived

from market prices.

Level 3: Where one or more significant inputs to valuation are unobservable. Valuations at this level are more subjective and

therefore more closely managed, including sensitivity analysis of inputs to valuation models. Such testing has not indicated that

any material difference would arise due to a change in input variables.

Transfers into and transfers out of the fair value hierarchy levels are recognised on the date of the event or change in

circumstances that caused the transfer. There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 and 3 during the period.

Derivative financial instruments are initially recognised on the trade date at fair value and subsequently re-measured at fair value.

In assessing fair value the Group uses its judgement to select suitable valuation techniques and make assumptions which are

mainly based on market conditions existing at the balance sheet date. The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated by

discounting estimated future cash flows based on the terms and maturity of each contract and using market interest rates for

similar instruments at the measurement date. These values are tested for reasonableness based upon broker or counterparty

quotes.

Available-for-sale investments, being investments intended to be held for an indefinite period, are initially and subsequently

measured at fair value. For listed investments, fair value is the current bid market value at the reporting date. For unlisted

investments where there is no active market, fair value is assessed using an appropriate methodology.

48

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 23 Cash generated from operations

Six months Six months Year

ended ended ended

30 June 30 June 31 December

2017 2016 2016

Notes £m £m £m

Profit before tax, joint ventures and associates 100.4 49.3 154.6

Adjusted for:

Revaluation of investment and development property 14 (9.2) 3.6 78.0

Gain on acquisition of businesses – (34.8) (34.6)

Loss on disposal of subsidiaries 0.9 – 0.3

Gain on sale of other investments – (74.1) (74.1)

Depreciation 1.3 1.1 2.2

Share-based payments 2.2 2.4 1.9

Lease incentives and letting costs (2.9) (3.4) (16.7)

Finance costs 7 105.1 98.6 202.9

Finance income 8 (4.9) (10.6) (14.9)

Other finance costs 9 15.1 15.4 37.9

Change in fair value of financial instruments (18.1) 127.6 16.3

Changes in working capital:

Change in trade and other receivables (10.1) (2.5) (1.0)

Change in trade and other payables 0.5 (9.6) 3.1 Cash generated from operations 180.3 163.0 355.9

24 Capital commitments

At 30 June 2017 the Board had approved £312.7 million of future expenditure for the purchase, construction, development and

enhancement of investment property. Of this, £169.0 million is contractually committed. The majority of this is expected to be spent

during the remainder of 2017 and 2018.

25 Acquisition of Madrid Xanadú

On 10 March 2017 the Group acquired 100 per cent interests in three entities, which together own and manage Madrid Xanadú

shopping centre, for initial cash consideration of €516.8 million (£453.5 million). The cash flow statement outflow of £446.3 million

reflects the £453.5 million less the unrestricted cash acquired of £7.2 million. Acquisition related costs of £1.3 million were incurred

and recognised in the income statement in exceptional administration expenses during the period.

The fair value of assets and liabilities acquired, at 100 per cent, are set out in the table below:

Fair value

£m

Assets

Investment and development property 461.4

Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash of £3.1 million) 10.3

Trade and other receivables 0.1 Total assets 471.8 Liabilities

Trade and other payables (21.0)

Deferred tax (77.7) Total liabilities (98.7) Net assets 373.1 Fair value of consideration paid 453.5 Goodwill 80.4

49

NOTES (unaudited) (continued) 25 Acquisition of Madrid Xanadú (continued)

The fair value of the consideration is greater than the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired, resulting in goodwill of £80.4

million being recognised on acquisition. The goodwill balance is primarily attributable to the recognition of a deferred tax balance

which is required to be recorded in accordance with IAS 12 Income Taxes.

From the date of acquisition, the acquired subsidiaries contributed £9.5 million to the revenue of the Group and contributed £4.3

million of profit in the period.

Had the entities been acquired on 1 January 2017, the Group would have reported revenue of £314.2 million and profit of £128.3

million for the period.

26 Assets classified as held for sale

In May we announced the formation of a joint venture with TH Real Estate for them to take ownership of 50 per cent of Madrid

Xanadú based on the original March 2017 acquisition price. As a result, Madrid Xanadú and all its related assets and liabilities

have been classified as held for sale. The completion date for this transaction is imminent.

The assets and liabilities below are presented at their carrying amount. There are no material differences between their carrying

amount and fair value less costs to sell.

£m

Assets of disposal groups classified as held for sale

Investment and development property 462.8

Goodwill 80.4

Other assets 16.3

Total 559.5

Liabilities of disposal groups classified as held for sale

Borrowings (226.3)

Deferred tax (78.0)

Other liabilities (24.5)

Total (328.8)

27 Related party transactions

There have been no related party transactions during the period that require disclosure under Section DTR 4.2.8 R of the

Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook or under IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting except those disclosed

elsewhere in this condensed set of financial statements.

28 Events after the reporting date

In May we announced the formation of a joint venture with TH Real Estate for them to take ownership of 50 per cent of Madrid

Xanadú based on the original March 2017 acquisition price. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, the transaction received EU

Merger approval and therefore is now expected to complete imminently.

50

OTHER INFORMATION

Investment and development property (unaudited) Property data – including Group’s share of joint ventures

Market Net initial Nominal

value Revaluation yield ‘Topped-up’ equivalent

£m surplus/deficit Ownership Note

(EPRA) NIY (EPRA) yield Occupancy

At 30 June 2017

Subsidiaries

intu Trafford Centre 2,324.0 – 100% 3.8% 3.9% 4.3% 96%

intu Lakeside 1,395.0 +1% 100% 3.3% 3.6% 4.5% 92%

intu Metrocentre 945.2 -1% 90% A 4.6% 5.0% 5.3% 95%

intu Merry Hill 917.3 – 100% 3.8% 4.1% 4.9% 92%

intu Braehead 533.1 -2% 100% 4.7% 4.9% 6.1% 96%

intu Derby 461.0 +1% 100% 5.6% 5.8% 6.2% 98%

Manchester Arndale 450.0 +1% 48% B 4.0% 4.2% 5.2% 100%

intu Victoria Centre 360.5 – 100% 4.7% 4.8% 5.7% 97%

intu Watford 336.0 -2% 93% 4.3% 4.3% 5.1% 96%

intu Eldon Square 323.7 +1% 60% 4.6% 4.9% 5.0% 99%

intu Chapelfield 305.1 +3% 100% 4.8% 5.1% 5.2% 100%

intu Milton Keynes 284.7 +1% 100% 4.5% 4.7% 4.9% 100%

Cribbs Causeway 239.6 – 33% C 4.7% 4.7% 5.2% 96%

intu Potteries 162.5 -5% 100% 5.9% 6.0% 7.4% 94%

Other 317.5 D

Investment and

development property

excluding Group’s share

of joint ventures 9,355.2

Joint ventures

St David’s, Cardiff 351.0 -1% 50% 4.0% 4.3% 4.8% 95%

Puerto Venecia, Zaragoza 224.8 +3% 50% E 4.5% 4.8% 5.8% 98%

intu Asturias 128.4 +4% 50% E 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 97%

Other 61.4 F

Investment and

development property

including Group’s share

of joint ventures 10,120.8 4.12% 4.33% 4.92% 96%G

At 31 December 2016

including Group’s share

of joint ventures 9,984.7 4.27% 4.45% 5.02% 96%

Please refer to the glossary for the definition of terms.

A Interest shown is that of The Metrocentre Partnership in intu Metrocentre (90 per cent) and the Metro Retail Park (100 per cent). The Group has a 60 per cent interest in

The Metrocentre Partnership which is consolidated as a subsidiary of the Group.

B The Group's interest is through a joint operation ownership of a 95 per cent interest in Manchester Arndale, and a 90 per cent interest in New Cathedral Street,

Manchester.

C The Group's interest is through a joint operation ownership of a 66 per cent interest in The Mall at Cribbs Causeway and a 100 per cent interest in The Retail Park, Cribbs

Causeway.

D Includes the Group’s interests in intu Broadmarsh, Soar at intu Braehead, development land in Spain, Charter Place, Watford and Sprucefield, Northern Ireland.

E Calculated in local currency.

F Includes the Group’s interest in intu Uxbridge.

G The EPRA vacancy rate at 30 June 2017 was 2.2 per cent (31 December 2016: 1.9 per cent; 30 June 2016: 2.3 per cent).

51

OTHER INFORMATION (continued)

Investment and development property (unaudited) (continued) Additional property information – including Group’s share of joint ventures

As at As at

30 June 31 December

2017 2016

£m £m

Passing rent 447.1 427.3

Annual property income 489.8 467.4

ERV 569.0 542.5

Weighted average unexpired lease term 7.3 years 7.7 years Analysis of capital return in the period – including Group’s share of joint ventures

Market value Revaluation

30 June 31 December surplus/(deficit)

2017 2016 30 June 2017

£m £m £m %

Like-for-like property 9,918.6 9,831.5 20.3 –

Acquisition: Madrid Xanadú 1 – – 1.0 n/a

Developments 202.2 153.2 (3.6) n/a Total investment and development property 10,120.8 9,984.7 17.7 n/a 1 Madrid Xanadú has been classified as an asset held for sale and therefore is excluded from the investment and development property balance.

Analysis of net rental income in the period – including Group’s share of joint ventures

Six months ended

30 June 30 June

2017 2016 Movement

£m £m £m %

Like-for-like property 209.3 212.6 (3.3) (1.5)

Acquisition: Madrid Xanadú 6.7 – 6.7 n/a

Acquisition: intu Merry Hill (50%) 9.3 – 9.3 n/a

Disposal: intu Bromley – 6.5 (6.5) n/a

Developments 0.9 0.3 0.6 n/a Total net rental income 226.2 219.4 6.8 n/a

52

OTHER INFORMATION (continued)

Financial covenants (unaudited) Intu (SGS) Finance plc and Intu (SGS) Finco Limited (‘Secured Group Structure’)

Interest Interest

Loan LTV LTV cover cover

£m Maturity covenant actual covenant actual

Term loan 351.8 2021

3.875 per cent bonds 450.0 2023

4.625 per cent bonds 350.0 2028

4.250 per cent bonds 350.0 2030

1,501.8 80% 49% 125% 255%

Covenants are tested on the Security Group, the principal assets of which are intu Lakeside, intu Braehead, intu Watford, intu

Victoria Centre and intu Derby. In June, intu Chapelfield was withdrawn from the Secured Group Structure. Further details on the

operating covenant regime are included in the 2016 Annual report.

The Trafford Centre Finance Limited

There are no financial covenants on the intu Trafford Centre CMBS debt of £775.2 million at 30 June 2017. However a debt service

charge ratio is assessed quarterly and where this falls below specified levels certain restrictions come into force. The loan to 30

June 2017 market value ratio is 35 per cent. No restrictions are in place at present.

Intu Metrocentre Finance plc

Interest Interest

Loan LTV LTV cover cover

£m Maturity covenant actual covenant actual

4.125 per cent bonds 485.0 2023 100% 51% 125% 215%

Further details on the operating covenant regime are included in the 2016 Annual report.

Other asset-specific debt

Loan

outstanding at Loan to Interest Interest 30 June 2017

1 LTV 30 June 2017 cover cover

£m Maturity

covenant market value2 covenant actual

3

intu Merry Hill

4 500.0 2018 65% 55% 150% 207%

intu Milton Keynes 140.5 2019 65% 49% 150% 308%

Sprucefield 33.2 2020 65% 50% 150% 329%

intu Uxbridge 5 26.0 2020 70% 54% 125% 215%

St David’s, Cardiff 122.5 2021 65% 35% 150% 307%

Puerto Venecia, Zaragoza 5 €112.5 2019 65% 44% 150% 306%

intu Asturias 5 €60.5 2021 65% 44% 150% 586%

Madrid Xanadú €262.9 2022 65% 50% 150% 404%

1 The loan values are the actual principal balances outstanding at 30 June 2017, which take into account any principal repayments made up to 30 June 2017. The

balance sheet value of the loans includes unamortised fees.

2 The loan to 30 June 2017 market value provides an indication of the impact the 30 June 2017 property valuations could have on the LTV covenants. The actual timing

and manner of testing LTV covenants varies and is loan specific.

3 Based on latest certified figures, calculated in accordance with loan agreements, which have submission dates between 30 June 2017 and 31 July 2017. The

calculations are loan specific and include a variety of historic, forecast and in certain instances a combined historic and forecast basis.

4 Since the period end, we have refinanced the intu Merry Hill loan, with the loan now maturing in 2024.

5 Debt shown is consistent with the Group’s economic interest.

53

OTHER INFORMATION (continued)

Financial covenants (unaudited) (continued) Intu Debenture plc

Capital Capital Interest Interest

Loan cover cover cover cover

£m Maturity covenant actual covenant actual

231.4 2027 150% 250% 100% 118%

The debenture is currently secured on a number of the Group’s properties including intu Potteries, intu Eldon Square, intu

Broadmarsh and Soar at intu Braehead.

Should the capital cover or interest cover test be breached, Intu Debenture plc (the ‘Issuer’) has three months from the date of

delivery of the valuation or the latest certificate to the Trustees to make good any deficiencies. The Issuer may withdraw property

secured on the debenture by paying a sum of money or through the substitution of alternative property provided that the capital

cover and interest cover tests are satisfied immediately following the substitution. Financial covenants on corporate facilities

Interest Interest Borrowings/ Borrowings/

Net worth Net worth cover cover net worth net worth

covenant actual covenant actual covenant actual

£600m facility, maturing in 2021* £1,200.0m £2,463.9 120% 205% 125% 60%

£375m due in 2022 2.875 per

cent convertible bonds** n/a n/a n/a n/a 175% 16%

£300m due in 2018 2.5 per cent

convertible bonds** n/a n/a n/a n/a 175% 16% * Tested on the Borrower Group which excludes, at the Group’s election, certain subsidiaries with asset-specific finance. The

facility is secured on the Group’s investments in Manchester Arndale and Cribbs Causeway.

** Tested on the Group excluding, at the Group’s election, the borrowings of certain subsidiaries with asset-specific finance.

Interest rate swaps

The table below sets out the nominal amount and average rate of hedging, excluding lenders’ margins, in place under current and

forward starting swap contracts.

Nominal amount Average rate

£m %

In effect on or after:

1 year 2,076.8 2.51

2 years 1,726.8 2.62

5 years 679.3 5.04

10 years 672.2 5.04

15 years 610.6 5.00

20 years 116.7 5.67

54

OTHER INFORMATION (continued)

Group including share of joint ventures (unaudited)

This section presents the financial information of the Group including the share of joint ventures on a line-by-line basis. It also

includes reconciliations between the information presented in the financial statements and that including the Group's share of joint

ventures as used in the operating and financial reviews.

Underlying profit statement

Six months Six months Six months

ended ended ended Year ended

30 June 30 June 31 December 31 December

2017 2016 2016 2016

£m £m £m £m

Net rental income 226.2 219.4 227.6 447.0

Net other income/(expense) 0.1 (0.3) (0.4) (0.7)

Administration expenses (20.6) (18.3) (20.3) (38.6) Underlying operating profit 205.7 200.8 206.9 407.7

Finance costs (107.5) (101.4) (107.1) (208.5)

Finance income 1.1 0.7 0.8 1.5

Other finance costs (2.9) (2.9) (3.0) (5.9) Underlying net finance costs (109.3) (103.6) (109.3) (212.9) Underlying profit before tax and associates 96.4 97.2 97.6 194.8

Tax on underlying profit (0.2) (0.1) 0.1 –

Share of underlying profit of associates 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.5

Remove amounts attributable to non-controlling interests 1.9 2.1 2.6 4.7 Underlying earnings 98.5 99.5 100.5 200.0 Underlying earnings per share (pence) 7.3p 7.5p 7.5p 15.0p Weighted average number of shares (million) 1,343.1 1,332.0 1,334.8 1,333.5

55

OTHER INFORMATION (continued)

Group including share of joint ventures (unaudited) (continued) Underlying profit for the six months ended 30 June 2017

Group

Group Share of including

underlying joint share of joint

profit ventures ventures

£m £m £m

Rent receivable 250.0 18.5 268.5

Service charge income 55.8 3.7 59.5

Facilities management income from joint ventures 1.5 (0.3) 1.2 Revenue 307.3 21.9 329.2 Net rental income 210.5 15.7 226.2

Net other income 0.6 (0.5) 0.1

Administration expenses (20.1) (0.5) (20.6) Underlying operating profit 191.0 14.7 205.7

Finance costs (105.1) (2.4) (107.5)

Finance income 4.9 (3.8) 1.1

Other finance costs (2.9) – (2.9) Underlying net finance costs (103.1) (6.2) (109.3) Underlying profit before tax, joint ventures and associates 87.9 8.5 96.4

Tax on underlying profit (0.2) – (0.2)

Share of underlying profit of joint ventures 8.5 (8.5) –

Share of underlying profit of associates 0.4 – 0.4

Remove amounts attributable to non-controlling interests 1.9 – 1.9 Underlying earnings 98.5 – 98.5

56

OTHER INFORMATION (continued)

Group including share of joint ventures (unaudited) (continued) Consolidated income statement for the six months ended 30 June 2017

Group

Group Share of including

income joint share of joint

statement ventures ventures

£m £m £m

Revenue 307.3 21.9 329.2 Net rental income 210.5 15.7 226.2

Net other income 0.6 (0.5) 0.1

Revaluation of investment and development property 9.2 8.5 17.7

Loss on disposal of subsidiaries (0.9) – (0.9)

Loss on sale of other investments – (0.3) (0.3)

Administration expenses – ongoing (20.1) (0.5) (20.6)

Administration expenses – exceptional (1.7) – (1.7) Operating profit 197.6 22.9 220.5 Finance costs (105.1) (2.4) (107.5)

Finance income 4.9 (3.8) 1.1

Other finance costs (15.1) – (15.1)

Change in fair value of financial instruments 18.1 0.6 18.7 Net finance costs (97.2) (5.6) (102.8) Profit before tax, joint ventures and associates 100.4 17.3 117.7

Share of post-tax profit of joint ventures 18.4 (18.4) –

Share of post-tax profit of associates 4.4 – 4.4 Profit before tax 123.2 (1.1) 122.1 Current tax (0.2) – (0.2)

Deferred tax (0.3) 1.5 1.2 Taxation (0.5) 1.5 1.0 Profit for the period 122.7 0.4 123.1 Non-controlling interests 4.4 (0.4) 4.0 Profit for the period attributable to owners of intu properties plc 127.1 – 127.1

57

OTHER INFORMATION (continued)

Group including share of joint ventures (unaudited) (continued) Balance sheet as at 30 June 2017

Group

Group Share of including

balance joint share of joint

sheet ventures ventures

£m £m £m

Assets

Investment and development property 9,322.5 764.2 10,086.7

Investment in joint ventures 603.1 (603.1) –

Cash and cash equivalents 250.4 38.5 288.9

Assets classified as held for sale 559.5 – 559.5

Other assets 346.9 15.4 362.3 Total assets 11,082.4 215.0 11,297.4 Liabilities

Borrowings (5,036.8) (182.9) (5,219.7)

Derivative financial instruments (352.0) (2.2) (354.2)

Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for sale (328.8) – (328.8)

Other liabilities (309.6) (27.0) (336.6) Total liabilities (6,027.2) (212.1) (6,239.3) Net assets 5,055.2 2.9 5,058.1 Non-controlling interests (63.2) (2.9) (66.1) Net assets attributable to owners of intu properties plc 4,992.0 – 4,992.0

58

OTHER INFORMATION (continued)

Group including share of joint ventures (unaudited) (continued) Investment and development property

30 June 31 December 30 June

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

Balance sheet carrying value of investment and development property 10,086.7 9,944.5 10,121.7

Tenant incentives included within trade and other receivables 122.4 120.4 115.0

Head leases included within finance leases in borrowings (88.3) (80.2) (89.7) Market value of investment and development property 10,120.8 9,984.7 10,147.0 Net external debt

30 June 31 December 30 June

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

Total borrowings 5,036.8 4,662.6 4,792.0

Cash and cash equivalents (250.4) (254.7) (245.5) Net debt 4,786.4 4,407.9 4,546.5

Metrocentre compound financial instrument (180.7) (177.8) (174.8) Net external debt – before Group’s share of joint ventures 4,605.7 4,230.1 4,371.7

Add share of borrowing of joint ventures 182.9 170.9 156.1

Less share of cash of joint ventures (38.5) (36.9) (20.6) Net external debt – including Group’s share of joint ventures 4,750.1 4,364.1 4,507.2 Analysed as:

Debt including Group’s share of joint ventures 5,039.0 4,655.7 4,773.3

Cash including Group’s share of joint ventures (288.9) (291.6) (266.1) Net external debt – including Group’s share of joint ventures 4,750.1 4,364.1 4,507.2 Debt to assets ratio

30 June 31 December 30 June

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

Market value of investment and development property 10,120.8 9,984.7 10,147.0

Net external debt (4,750.1) (4,364.1) (4,507.2) Debt to assets ratio 46.9% 43.7% 44.4%

59

OTHER INFORMATION (continued)

Group including share of joint ventures (unaudited) (continued)

EPRA summary

The EPRA Best Practice Recommendations identify six key performance measures, including the EPRA cost ratios. The measures

are deemed to be of importance for investors in property companies and aim to encourage more consistent and widespread

disclosure. The Group is supportive of this initiative but continues to disclose additional measures throughout this interim report

which it believes are more appropriate to the Group’s current circumstances.

In 2016, the Group retained its EPRA Gold Award for exceptional compliance with the EPRA Best Practice Recommendations.

The EPRA measures are summarised below:

30 June 30 June 31 December

2017 2016 2016

Notes £m £m £m

EPRA cost ratio (including direct vacancy costs)

1 19.4% 17.3% 18.6%

EPRA cost ratio (excluding direct vacancy costs) 1 15.0% 14.1% 15.0%

EPRA earnings 12(c) 96.5m 98.8m 192.9m

- per share 12(c) 7.2p 7.5p 14.5p

EPRA NAV 13(a) 5,186.0m 5,111.6m 5,200.9m

- per share 13(a) 385p 382p 386p

EPRA NNNAV 13(b) 4,697.4m 4,593.2m 4,698.9m

- per share 13(b) 349p 343p 349p

EPRA net initial yield 2 4.1% 4.3% 4.3%

EPRA ‘topped-up’ NIY 2 4.3% 4.5% 4.5%

EPRA vacancy rate 1 2.2% 2.3% 1.9%

1 As presented below.

2 See other information, investment and development property.

Details of the Group’s performance against the EPRA Best Practice Recommendations on Sustainability Reporting can be found

in full in the 2016 corporate responsibility report. In 2016, the Group retained its Gold EPRA Sustainability Best Practice

Recommendations award.

60

OTHER INFORMATION (continued)

Group including share of joint ventures (unaudited) (continued)

EPRA cost ratios

Six months Six months Year

ended ended ended

30 June 30 June 31 December

2017 2016 2016

£m £m £m

Administration expenses – ongoing 20.6 18.3 38.6

Net service charge costs 7.9 7.2 16.1

Other non-recoverable costs 24.2 19.2 44.1

Remove: service charge costs recovered through rents (3.2) (2.5) (5.6) EPRA costs – including direct vacancy costs 49.5 42.2 93.2

Direct vacancy costs (11.3) (7.8) (18.0) EPRA costs – excluding direct vacancy costs 38.2 34.4 75.2

Rent receivable 268.5 258.8 532.6

Rent payable (10.2) (13.0) (25.4) Gross rental income less ground rent payable 258.3 245.8 507.2

Remove: service charge costs recovered through rents (3.2) (2.5) (5.6) Gross rental income 255.1 243.3 501.6

EPRA cost ratio – including direct vacancy costs 19.4% 17.3% 18.6%

EPRA cost ratio – excluding direct vacancy costs 15.0% 14.1% 15.0% EPRA vacancy rate

30 June 31 December 30 June

2017 2016 2016

% % %

intu Trafford Centre 2.3 0.8 0.4

intu Lakeside 2.4 3.4 3.8

intu Metrocentre 4.4 2.8 4.9

intu Merry Hill 1.9 1.7 2.3

intu Braehead 2.5 2.4 2.9

Madrid Xanadú 1.6 n/a n/a

intu Derby 1.7 0.5 0.5

Manchester Arndale 0.3 1.1 0.4

intu Victoria Centre 1.8 3.3 0.4

intu Watford 2.2 0.2 3.6

intu Eldon Square 0.4 0.6 1.1

intu Chapelfield – 1.5 2.5

intu Milton Keynes – – –

Cribbs Causeway 1.9 3.3 4.8

intu Potteries 4.5 3.4 2.6

intu Bromley n/a n/a 3.0

St David’s, Cardiff 4.6 4.2 3.5

Puerto Venecia, Zaragoza 1.8 3.2 5.1

intu Asturias 2.5 0.9 0.6 2.2 1.9 2.3

61

GLOSSARY ABC1 customers

Proportion of customers within UK social groups A, B and C1, defined as members of households whose chief earner’s occupation is

professional, higher or intermediate management, or supervisory.

Annual property income

The Group’s share of passing rent plus the independent external valuers’ estimate of annual excess turnover rent and sundry income such

as that from car parks and mall commercialisation.

CACI

Provide market research on intu's customers and UK wide location analysis.

Debt to assets ratio

Net external debt divided by the market value of investment and development property.

Diluted figures

Reported amounts adjusted to include the effects of dilutive potential shares issuable under convertible bonds and employee

incentive arrangements.

Earnings per share

Profit for the period attributable to owners of intu properties plc divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the

period.

EPRA

European Public Real Estate Association, the publisher of Best Practice Recommendations intended to make financial statements

of public real estate companies in Europe clearer, more transparent and comparable.

ERV (estimated rental value)

The independent external valuers’ estimate of the Group’s share of the current annual market rent of all lettable space after expiry of

concessionary periods net of any non-recoverable charges but before bad debt provisions.

Exceptional items

Items that in the Directors’ view are required to be separately disclosed by virtue of their size, nature or incidence. Underlying earnings

is considered to be a key measure in understanding the Group’s financial performance, and excludes exceptional items.

Headline rent ITZA

Annual contracted rent per square foot after expiry of concessionary periods in terms of Zone A.

Interest cover

Underlying operating profit divided by the net finance cost excluding the change in fair value of financial instruments, exceptional

finance costs and amortisation of the Metrocentre compound financial instrument.

Interest rate swap

A derivative financial instrument enabling parties to exchange interest rate obligations for a predetermined period. These are

used by the Group to convert floating rate debt to fixed rates.

IPD

Investment Property Databank Limited, producer of an independent benchmark of property returns.

Like-for-like property

Investment property which has been owned throughout both periods without significant capital expenditure in either period, so

that income can be compared on a like-for-like basis. For the purposes of comparison of capital values, this will also include

assets owned at the previous reporting period end but not throughout the prior period.

Long-term lease

A lease with a term certain of at least five years.

LTV (loan to value)

The ratio of attributable debt to the market value of an investment property.

NAV per share (diluted, adjusted)

NAV per share calculated on a diluted basis and adjusted to remove the fair value of derivatives (net of tax), goodwill resulting from

the recognition of deferred tax liabilities, and deferred tax on investment and development property and other investments.

Net asset value (‘NAV’) per share

Net assets attributable to owners of intu properties plc divided by the number of ordinary shares in issue at the period end.

62

GLOSSARY (continued) Net external debt

Net debt after removing the Metrocentre compound financial instrument.

Net initial yield (EPRA)

Annualised net rent on investment property (after deduction of revenue costs such as head rent, running void, service

charge after shortfalls, empty rates and merchant association contribution) expressed as a percentage of the gross market

value before deduction of theoretical acquisition costs, consistent with EPRA’s net initial yield, and as provided by the Group’s

independent external valuers.

Net rental income

The Group’s share of net rents receivable as shown in the income statement, having taken due account of non-recoverable

costs, bad debt provisions and adjustments to comply with IFRS including those regarding tenant lease incentives.

NNNAV per share (diluted, adjusted)

NAV per share (diluted, adjusted) adjusted to include the fair values of derivatives, borrowings and deferred taxes.

Nominal equivalent yield

Effective annual yield to a purchaser from an asset at market value before taking account of notional acquisition costs assuming rent

is receivable annually in arrears, reflecting ERV but disregarding potential changes in market rents, as determined by the Group’s

independent external valuers.

Occupancy

The passing rent of let and under offer units expressed as a percentage of the passing rent of let and under offer units plus

ERV of un-let units, excluding development and recently completed properties. Units let to tenants in administration and still

trading are treated as let and those no longer trading are treated as un-let.

Passing rent

The Group’s share of contracted annual rents receivable at the balance sheet date. This takes no account of accounting

adjustments made in respect of rent free periods or tenant incentives, the reclassification of certain lease payments as

finance charges or any irrecoverable costs and expenses, and does not include excess turnover rent, additional rent in

respect of unsettled rent reviews or sundry income such as from car parks etc. Contracted annual rents in respect of

tenants in administration are excluded.

PMA

Property Market Analysis LLP, a producer of property market research and forecasting.

Property Income Distribution (‘PID’)

A dividend, generally subject to UK withholding tax at the basic rate of income tax, that a UK REIT is required to pay to its

shareholders from its qualifying rental profits. Certain classes of shareholder may qualify to receive a PID gross,

shareholders should refer to intugroup.co.uk for further information. The Group can also pay non-PID dividends which are

not subject to UK withholding tax.

Real Estate Investment Trust (‘REIT’)

REITs are internationally recognised property investment vehicles which have now been introduced in many countries around the

world. Each country has its own rules, but the broad intention of REITs is to encourage investment in domestic property by removing tax

distortions for investors.

In the UK, REITs must meet certain ongoing rules and regulations, including the requirement to distribute at least 90 per cent of

qualifying rental profits to shareholders. Withholding tax of 20 per cent is deducted from these Property Income Distributions (see

definition). Profits from a REIT’s non-property business remain subject to normal corporation tax. The Group elected for REIT

status in the UK with effect from 1 January 2007.

Scrip Dividend Scheme

The Group offers shareholders the opportunity to participate in the Scrip Dividend Scheme. This enables participating shareholders

to receive shares instead of cash when a Scrip Alternative is offered for a particular dividend.

Short-term lease

A lease with a term certain of less than five years.

SOCIMI

The Spanish equivalent of a Real Estate Investment Trust.

Tenant (or lease) incentives

Any incentives offered to occupiers to enter into a lease. Typically incentives are in the form of an initial rent free period

and/or a cash contribution to fit out the premises. Under IFRS the value of incentives granted to tenants is amortised

through the income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

63

GLOSSARY (continued) Topped-up NIY (EPRA)

Net initial yield (‘NIY’) adjusted for the expiration of rent free periods and other unexpired lease incentives.

Total financial return

The change in NAV per share (diluted, adjusted) plus dividends per share paid in the period expressed as a percentage of

opening NAV per share (diluted, adjusted).

Total property return

The change in capital value, less any capital expenditure incurred, plus net income in the year expressed as a percentage of the capital

employed (opening capital value plus capital expenditure incurred) in the year as calculated by IPD.

Underlying earnings per share (‘EPS’)

Earnings per share adjusted to exclude valuation movements, exceptional items and related tax.

Underlying figures

Amounts described as underlying exclude valuation movements, exceptional items and related tax.

Vacancy rate (EPRA)

The ERV of vacant space divided by total ERV.

Yield shift

A movement (usually expressed in basis points) in the yield of a property asset.

64

DIVIDENDS

The Directors of intu properties plc have announced an interim dividend per ordinary share (ISIN GB0006834344) of 4.6

pence (2016: 4.6 pence) payable on 21 November 2017 (see salient dates below). An announcement confirming whether a

scrip dividend alternative will be offered will be made on 10 October 2017.

The dividend may be partly paid as a Property Income Distribution (‘PID’) and partly paid as a non-PID. The PID element

will be subject to deduction of a 20 per cent withholding tax unless exemptions apply (please refer to the PID special note

below). Any non-PID element will be treated as an ordinary UK company dividend. For South African shareholders, any

non-PID cash dividends may be subject to deduction of South African Dividends Tax at 20 per cent.

Shareholders will be advised of the PID/non-PID split no later than Tuesday 10 October 2017.

Dates

The following are the salient dates for the payment of the interim dividend:

Monday, 9 October 2017 Sterling/Rand exchange rate struck.

Tuesday, 10 October 2017 Sterling/Rand exchange rate and dividend amount in SA currency announced.

Wednesday, 18 October 2017 Ordinary shares listed ex-dividend on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange.

Thursday, 19 October 2017 Ordinary shares listed ex-dividend on the London Stock Exchange.

Friday, 20 October 2017 Record date for interim dividend in London and Johannesburg.

Friday, 20 October 2017 UK shareholders only: Last date for receipt of Tax Exemption Declaration forms to

permit dividends to be paid gross.

Tuesday, 21 November 2017 Dividend payment day for shareholders

Note: If a scrip dividend alternative were to be offered, the deadline for submission of valid election forms will be 20 October 2017 for shareholders on the

South African register and 27 October 2017 for shareholders on the UK register.

South African shareholders should note that, in accordance with the requirements of Strate, the last day to trade cum-

dividend will be Tuesday, 17 October 2017 and that no dematerialisation or rematerialisation of shares will be possible from

Wednesday, 18 October to Friday, 20 October 2017 inclusive. No transfers between the UK and South African registers

may take place from Tuesday, 10 October to Friday, 20 October 2017 inclusive.

PID SPECIAL NOTE:

UK shareholders:

For those who are eligible for exemption from the 20 per cent withholding tax and have not previously registered for

exemption, an HM Revenue & Customs (‘HMRC’) Tax Exemption Declaration is available for download from the

‘Investors’ section of the intu properties plc website (intugroup.co.uk), or on request to our UK registrars, Capita Asset

Services. Validly completed forms must be received by Capita Asset Services no later than the Record Date, Friday 20

October 2017; otherwise the dividend will be paid after deduction of tax.

South African and other non-UK shareholders:

South African shareholders may apply to HMRC after payment of the dividend for a refund of the difference between the 20

per cent withholding tax and the UK/South African double taxation treaty rate of 15 per cent. Other non-UK shareholders

may be able to make similar claims for a refund of UK withholding tax deducted. Refund application forms for all non-UK

shareholders are available for download from the ‘Investors’ section of the intu properties plc website (intugroup.co.uk), or

on request to our South African registrars, Terbium Financial Services, or HMRC. UK withholding tax refunds are not

claimable from intu properties plc, the South African Revenue Service (‘SARS’) or other national authorities, only from the

UK’s HMRC.

Additional information on PIDs can be found at intugroup.co.uk/en/investors/shareholders-information/real-estate-

investment-trust/.

The above does not constitute advice and shareholders should seek their own professional guidance. intu properties plc

does not accept liability for any loss suffered arising from reliance on the above.


Recommended