Previous Printings—N o v e m b e r 2 0 0 3 , Ma r ch 2 0 0 4
REPORT OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41.1 Charge to Update the HPCC Grand Challenges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41.2 Why Have New Grand Challenges? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. CRITERIA AND TEMPLATE FOR FORMULATING THE NITRD ILLUSTRATIVE GRAND CHALLENGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.1 Title. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.2 Description of the Multi-Decade Grand Challenge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.3 Focus in the Next Ten Years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.4 Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.5 Relationship to National Priorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.6 Relationship to IT Hard Problem Areas and IT Hard Problems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.7 Indications of Progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3. FUTURE OF THE NITRD ILLUSTRATIVE GRAND CHALLENGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Figure 1. Relationships Between the Illustrative Grand Challenges and the National Priorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Figure 2. Relationships Between the Illustrative Grand Challenges and the IT Hard Problem Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4. DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF THE NITRD ILLUSTRATIVE GRAND CHALLENGES4.1 Knowledge Environments for Science and Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124.2 Clean Energy Production Through Improved Combustion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144.3 High Confidence Infrastructure Control Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164.4 Improved Patient Safety and Health Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184.5 Informed Strategic Planning for Long-Term Regional Climate Change . . . . . . . . 204.6 Nanoscale Science and Technology: Explore and Exploit the
Behavior of Ensembles of Atoms and Molecules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224.7 Predicting Pathways and Health Effects of Pollutants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244.8 Real-Time Detection, Assessment, and Response to Natural
or Man-Made Threats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264.9 Safer, More Secure, More Efficient, Higher-Capacity Multi-Modal
Transportation System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284.10 Anticipate Consequences of Universal Participation in a Digital Society . . . . . . . . 304.11 Collaborative Intelligence: Integrating Humans with Intelligent Technologies . . . 324.12 Generating Insights From Information at Your Fingertips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 344.13 Managing Knowledge-Intensive Organizations in Dynamic Environments . . . . . . 364.14 Rapidly Acquiring Proficiency in Natural Languages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384.15 SimUniverse: Learning by Exploring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404.16 Virtual Lifetime Tutor for All. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
APPENDIX 1: ILLUSTRATIVE IT HARD PROBLEMS CATEGORIZED BY IT HARD PROBLEM AREAS . . 44
APPENDIX 2: THE HPCC PROGRAM’S GRAND CHALLENGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
APPENDIX 3: NITRD GRAND CHALLENGES AUTHORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
APPENDIX 4: NITRD GRAND CHALLENGES TASK FORCE CONTACT INFORMATION. . . . . . . . . . . 49
APPENDIX 5: ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This definition is characteristic of human-ity’s resolve to find solutions to chal-
lenges that go far beyond mere intellectualcuriosity. It is embedded in humanity’s verynature to conquer new frontiers for social,economic, and political advancement. Infor-mation technology is an important elementin conquering these frontiers.
Recognizing this role, the U.S. Govern-ment makes critical decisions aboutappropriate investments in IT R&D to helpsociety forward both socially and eco-nomically. To inform that decision-making, inJuly of 2003, a group of leading Governmenttechnical program managers who participatein the Networking and InformationTechnology Research and Development(NITRD) Program completed their formu-lation of 16 illustrative science, engineering,and societal grand challenges. Addressingthese grand challenges will require inno-vations in IT R&D.
The new NITRD illustrative grand chal-lenges were formulated to stimulate currentand future generations of NITRD andapplications researchers. They are illustrativeand not definitive or exhaustive because thereare easily hundreds if not thousands of grandchallenges that could be identified.
The NITRD illustrative grand challengescan be symbolically depicted as both a journeyand a destination. The journey, which is likelyto take more than a decade, is to a destinationthat lies far beyond current human under-standing and capability. By describing thesechallenges, we intend to explain why IT R&Dis important to society, justify why publicinvestments in IT R&D are necessary anddesirable, and galvanize the NITRD agenciesand the IT R&D community to solve IT hardproblems. Given the rapidly evolving natureof information technology, solutions totoday’s grand challenges will fuel the grandchallenges of tomorrow.
The NITRD Program’s illustrative grandchallenges are:
Knowledge Environments for Science andEngineering
Clean Energy Production Through Improved Combustion
High Confidence Infrastructure Control Systems
Improved Patient Safety and Health Quality
Informed Strategic Planning for Long-TermRegional Climate Change
Nanoscale Science and Technology: Explore andExploit the Behavior of Ensembles of Atomsand Molecules
2
“ A Grand Challenge is a long-term science, engineering,
or societal advance, whose realization requires innovative
breakthroughs in information technology research and
development (IT R&D) and which will help address our
country’s priorities.”
—The 2003 NITRD Program Grand Challenge definition
REPORT OVERVIEW
Predicting Pathways and Health Effects of Pollutants
Real-Time Detection, Assessment, and Response toNatural or Man-Made Threats
Safer, More Secure, More Efficient, Higher-Capacity, Multi-Modal Transportation System
Anticipate Consequences of UniversalParticipation in a Digital Society
Collaborative Intelligence: Integrating Humanswith Intelligent Technologies
Generating Insights From Information at Your Fingertips
Managing Knowledge-Intensive Dynamic Systems
Rapidly Acquiring Proficiency in NaturalLanguages
SimUniverse: Learning by ExploringVirtual Lifetime Tutor for All
This booklet provides an elaboration ofeach of the 16 illustrative NITRD grandchallenges (henceforth referred to as grandchallenges). They cover a wide spectrum ofdisciplines and sub-disciplines includingeducation, the environment, health, thephysical sciences, security, and transpor-tation. For each grand challenge, there is abrief description, component challenges thatrequire focus within the next decade, theirrelationship to national priorities, theirpotential benefits, IT hard problems thatneed solving in order to help realize the goalsof the grand challenge, and indicators thatwill show that progress is being made in theintermediate term. These grand challengesare aligned with the missions of the NITRDagencies and address a vast array of broadsocietal goals.
The national priorities and the IT hardproblems are the key pillars on which thegrand challenges are structured:
By describing the relationship between agrand challenge and national priorities,the grand challenge’s significance isconnected to the highest aspirations ofour country.
The IT hard problems, whose solutionthe grand challenge requires, tie thegrand challenge to core elements ofinformation technology research anddevelopment and the NITRD Program.
These two sets of relationships areillustrated on pages 8 and 9.
Chapter 1 describes how and why thesegrand challenges were developed, chapter 2explains the template used to describe thegrand challenges, chapter 3 discusses thefuture of the grand challenges, and chapter 4describes the grand challenges in detail.
3
1. INTRODUCTIONIn November 2002, the Interagency Work-
ing Group on Information TechnologyResearch and Development (IWG/IT R&D) ofthe National Science and Technology Council(NSTC), Executive Office of the President,established a Grand Challenges Task Force.The IWG/IT R&D, a body of leadingGovernment experts who provide hands-oncoordination of the multi-agency Networkingand IT R&D (NITRD) Program, charged theTask Force with identifying a set of science,engineering, and societal challenges that willrequire innovations in IT R&D. The TaskForce consisted of expert volunteers from tenNITRD agencies—AHRQ, DARPA, DOE/SC,EPA, NIH, NIST, NOAA, NSA, NSF,ODDR&E—plus FAA, OSTP, and theNCO/IT R&D (these acronyms are spelledout in Appendix 4).
1.1 CHARGE TO UPDATE THE HPCC GRAND CHALLENGES
The charge to formulate a set of NITRDgrand challenges was specifically a call toupdate the list called for in the High-Performance Computing (HPC) Act of 1991(P.L. 102-192) that formally established theHigh Performance Computing andCommunications (HPCC) Program. Throughthe HPCC Program, the U.S. Governmentcoordinated multi-agency investments indeveloping and using high-performancecomputing systems and advanced networkingtechnologies to meet the mission needs of theparticipating agencies and larger nationalgoals. The Act’s objectives included to:
Develop teraops (trillions of operationsper second) computing systems
Develop gigabit (billions of bits persecond) networks
Develop advanced algorithms and software
Demonstrate innovative solutions to“grand challenge” problems using HPCCtechnologies
1.2 WHY HAVE NEW GRAND CHALLENGES?
Seven HPCC Program agencies identified32 grand challenges (listed in Appendix 2).By the time of its formal conclusion in 1996,the HPCC Program had met both itsprogrammatic and grand challenge objec-tives (see the HPCC Program’s FY 1996annual report to Congress known as the BlueBook at http://www.nitrd.gov/pubs/blue96/).
The NITRD Program has succeeded theHPCC Program. The scope has beenexpanded to include all areas of informationtechnology research and development, notjust high-end computing and high-speednetworking. This expansion has enabled theparticipating agencies to address a vastlybroader range of information technologiesand IT application challenges than in theHPCC Program and its grand challenges.
Recognizing that IT advances will enhanceexisting applications and enable new onesthat can have an even greater impact onscience, engineering, and society, the NITRDGrand Challenges Task Force developed anew definition of a grand challenge (foundon page 2) and identified 16 illustrativegrand challenges. These grand challengesare expected to yield significant break-throughs of practical importance to mankind.As progress is made, these challenges cancontinuously evolve, be updated, and bereplaced by new grand challenges.
4
2. CRITERIA AND TEMPLATE FORFORMULATING THE NITRDILLUSTRATIVE GRAND CHALLENGESA set of criteria was established to guide
the development of the grand challenges.These criteria are reflected in the templateused in chapter 4 to describe the grandchallenges and are explained below:
Title
Description of the Multi-Decade Grand Challenge
Focus in the Next Ten Years
Benefits
Relationship to National Priorities
Relationship to IT Hard Problem Areas
Indications of Progress
2.1 TITLE
To stimulate multi-disciplinary thinking,the titles were crafted to reflect the TaskForce’s goal that they challenge theintellectual aspirations of our country’sresearchers beyond their understandingtoday or in the next decade. The list beginswith physical science challenges in honor oftheir HPCC predecessors, followed bychallenges that have strong human aspects.However, the list has not been prioritized bylevel of importance.
2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE MULTI-DECADEGRAND CHALLENGE
The description articulates the challengethat the Task Force thinks is likely to beaccomplished no sooner than ten years fromnow. However, given today’s normal rapidnature of technological advances andoccasional serendipitous developments (such
as the success of the Internet and the earlysuccess of the World Wide Web during theHPCC Program), these goals might beaccomplished sooner. On the other hand,some of these grand challenges may not beaccomplished even in half a century. Indeed,conceptual ideas similar to some of theNITRD grand challenges have already beensubjects of decades of intensive research(natural languages is an example) and theirdescriptions here reflect advances that havebeen made to date.
2.3 FOCUS IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS
While keeping the longer-term grandchallenge in perspective, certain aspects ofthe challenge have been identified forfocused attention in the next ten years. Someof these focus areas were selected becausethey are particularly difficult and need to betackled right away. For others, the knowledgeand resources needed to address them areavailable today. Focus on these componentchallenges in the near term helps sustainfocus on the longer-term grand challenge.
2.4 BENEFITS
The NITRD grand challenges can gen-erate a vast array of social, economic,political, scientific, and technology benefits astheir solutions are found. Common threadspermeating these benefits include findinganswers to complex questions that have longperplexed humanity, creating new disciplinesof human inquiry and areas of multi-disciplinary collaboration, and developingand using new technologies.
2.5 RELATIONSHIP TO NATIONAL PRIORITIES
Working closely with officials at the WhiteHouse Office of Science and TechnologyPolicy (OSTP), the Task Force defined six
5
national priorities that reflect the country’sbroad-based scientific, military, social, eco-nomic, and political values and goals. Each ofthe grand challenges strongly contributes toone or more of these national priorities:
Leadership in Science and Technology
Homeland and National Security
Health and Environment
Economic Prosperity
A Well-Educated Populace
A Vibrant Civil Society
While the NITRD grand challenges werestructured within a national context, inter-national collaborations and partnerships willbe essential to successfully address many ofthe grand challenges, and all nations canbenefit from the advances that are made.
Figure 1 (page 8) depicts relationships be-tween the grand challenges and the nationalpriorities. Each cell colored dark blue reflectsan explicit relationship between a grandchallenge and a national priority.
2.6 RELATIONSHIP TO IT HARD PROBLEMAREAS AND IT HARD PROBLEMS
IT hard problems areas are broad categoriesof topics of interest to the informationtechnology research and development com-munity and the NITRD Program. The TaskForce identified 14 IT hard problem areas:
Algorithms and Applications
Complex Heterogeneous Systems
Hardware Technologies
High Confidence IT
High-End Computing Systems
Human Augmentation IT
Information Management
Intelligent Systems
IT System Design
IT Usability
IT Workforce
Management of IT
Networks
Software Technologies
Each grand challenge requires advances inseveral IT hard problem areas, as illustrated inFigure 2 (page 9). Each light blue cell indicatesan explicit relationship between a grand cha-llenge and an IT hard problem area.
For each IT hard problem area, the TaskForce identified one or more illustrative IThard problems (Appendix 1). Specific IThard problems are identified in the write-upof each grand challenge. Progress towards thegrand challenge will require breakthroughsor solutions to these IT hard problems. TheIT hard problems are beyond our currentunderstanding and capability, but inter-mediate progress toward accomplishing themwill contribute to the grand challenge.
The IT hard problems span the breadth ofthe NITRD Program’s current investments.Given the fast moving nature of informationtechnology R&D, the IT hard problems arelikely to change over time, and the NITRDProgram will evolve in response to thesechanges.
2.7 INDICATIONS OF PROGRESS
For a multi-decade activity such as a grandchallenge, it is helpful to identify entitieswhose change over time indicates thatprogress is being made. These entities can bequalitative or quantitative in nature. Some of
6
the quantitative entities can nonetheless bedifficult or impossible to measure (examplesare reduced errors or reduced failures). Oftenthe best, the most significant, or the mostinfluential achievements are qualitative innature, at least according to our currentunderstanding. It could take decades toappreciate the impact of inventions or dis-coveries, for example. The indicators ofprogress for the NITRD grand challengesspan this range.
3. FUTURE OF THE NITRD ILLUSTRATIVEGRAND CHALLENGES The NITRD grand challenges are expected
to change over time. Progress will be made.Goals will change. New challenges will emerge.
Twelve years have elapsed since the HPCCProgram identified its grand challenges, andthe NITRD Program or its successor maysomeday revisit its grand challenges with theintention of revising their definition anddetails.
In the meantime these grand challengescan guide technical program managers inNITRD agencies and policymakers in theCongress and the Executive Branch. Theycan serve as beacons for intellectualendeavors of current and future generationsof students and researchers in universitiesand national and corporate laboratoriesacross the country. Researchers wishing toreach beyond current limitations can build onthe NITRD grand challenges in articulatingtheir own visions.
The NITRD Program has a long history ofcollaboration and coordination across Federalagencies and with universities and corp-orations throughout the country, to which itattributes much of its success. Accomplishingthe grand challenges’ goals is possible only byexpanding these interactions.
Success in these grand challenges alsorequires international collaboration andcooperation, as illustrated by the followingaspects of these grand challenges:
Climate change, energy, human health,natural and man-made disasters,pollution, and transportation spannational boundaries.
Researchers, workers, teachers, andstudents live in different countries and/orspeak different languages yet need to useunique scientific instruments or scientificdata sets and need to communicate witheach other both verbally and in writing.Some (emergency first responders andwar fighters, for example) will also needto talk and listen to IT systems such as robots.
The benefits of IT can be brought toremote areas both in the United Statesand around the world, and IT can beused to improve education, increaseunderstanding of different cultures andsocieties, and build communities.
7
ILLU
STR
AT
IVE
GR
AN
D C
HA
LL
EN
GE
S
Kno
wle
dge
Env
iron
men
ts fo
r Sc
ienc
e an
d E
ngin
eeri
ng
Cle
an E
nerg
y Pr
oduc
tion
Thr
ough
Im
prov
ed C
ombu
stio
n
Hig
h C
onfid
ence
Inf
rast
ruct
ure
Con
trol
Sys
tem
s
Impr
oved
Pat
ient
Saf
ety
and
Hea
lth Q
ualit
y
Info
rmed
Str
ateg
ic P
lann
ing
for
Lon
g-Te
rm
Reg
iona
l Clim
ate
Cha
nge
Nan
osca
le S
cien
ce a
nd T
echn
olog
y: E
xplo
re a
nd E
xplo
it th
e B
ehav
ior
of E
nsem
bles
of A
tom
s an
d M
olec
ules
Pred
ictin
g Pa
thw
ays
and
Hea
lth E
ffec
ts o
f Pol
luta
nts
Rea
l-Tim
e D
etec
tion,
Ass
essm
ent,
and
Res
pons
e to
N
atur
al o
r M
an-M
ade
Thr
eats
Safe
r, M
ore
Secu
re, M
ore
Eff
icie
nt, H
ighe
r-C
apac
ity
Mul
ti-M
odal
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Syst
em
Ant
icip
ate
Con
sequ
ence
s of
Uni
vers
al P
artic
ipat
ion
in
a D
igita
l Soc
iety
Col
labo
rativ
e In
telli
genc
e: I
nteg
ratin
g H
uman
s w
ith
Inte
llige
nt T
echn
olog
ies
Gen
erat
ing
Insi
ghts
Fro
m I
nfor
mat
ion
at Y
our
Fing
ertip
s
Man
agin
g K
now
ledg
e-In
tens
ive
Org
aniz
atio
ns in
D
ynam
ic E
nvir
onm
ents
Rap
idly
Acq
uiri
ng P
rofic
ienc
y in
Nat
ural
Lan
guag
es
Sim
Uni
vers
e: L
earn
ing
by E
xplo
ring
Virt
ual L
ifetim
e Tu
tor
for
All
8
FIG
URE
1. R
ELA
TIO
NSH
IPS
BETW
EEN
TH
E IL
LUST
RATI
VE
GRA
ND
CH
ALL
ENG
ES A
ND
TH
EN
ATI
ON
AL
PRIO
RITI
ES
HEA
LTH
ANDENVI
RONMEN
T
LEADER
SHIP
IN
SCIENCE
ANDTEC
HNOLO
GY
A WEL
L-EDUCAT
ED
POPULACE
NATIO
NALAND
HOM
ELAND
SECURIT
Y
ECONOMIC
PROSPER
ITY
A VIB
RANT
CIVIL
SOCIETY
NA
TIO
NA
L P
RIO
RIT
IES
ILLU
STR
AT
IVE
GR
AN
D C
HA
LL
EN
GE
SK
now
ledg
e E
nvir
onm
ents
for
Scie
nce
and
Eng
inee
ring
Cle
an E
nerg
y Pr
oduc
tion
Thr
ough
Im
prov
ed C
ombu
stio
nH
igh
Con
fiden
ce I
nfra
stru
ctur
e C
ontr
ol S
yste
ms
Impr
oved
Pat
ient
Saf
ety
and
Hea
lth Q
ualit
yIn
form
ed S
trat
egic
Pla
nnin
g fo
r L
ong-
Term
R
egio
nal C
limat
e C
hang
eN
anos
cale
Sci
ence
and
Tec
hnol
ogy:
Exp
lore
an
d E
xplo
it th
e B
ehav
ior
of E
nsem
bles
of
Ato
ms
and
Mol
ecul
esPr
edic
ting
Path
way
s an
d H
ealth
Eff
ects
of
Pol
luta
nts
Rea
l-Tim
e D
etec
tion,
Ass
essm
ent,
and
Res
pons
e to
Nat
ural
or
Man
-Mad
e T
hrea
tsSa
fer,
Mor
e Se
cure
, Mor
e E
ffic
ient
, H
ighe
r-C
apac
ity M
ulti-
Mod
al
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
Ant
icip
ate
Con
sequ
ence
s of
Uni
vers
al
Part
icip
atio
n in
a D
igita
l Soc
iety
Col
labo
rativ
e In
telli
genc
e: I
nter
grat
ing
Hum
ans
with
Int
ellig
ent T
echn
olog
ies
Gen
erat
ing
Insi
ghts
Fro
m I
nfor
mat
ion
at Y
our
Fing
ertip
sM
anag
ing
Kno
wle
dge-
Inte
nsiv
e O
rgan
izat
ions
in D
ynam
ic E
nvir
onm
ents
Rap
idly
Acq
uiri
ng P
rofic
ienc
y in
N
atur
al L
angu
ages
Sim
Uni
vers
e: L
earn
ing
by E
xplo
ring
Virt
ual L
ifetim
e Tu
tor
for
All
COMPLEX
HETEROGENEOUSSYSTEMS
FIG
URE
2. R
ELA
TIO
NSH
IPS
BETW
EEN
TH
E IL
LUST
RATI
VE
GRA
ND
CH
ALL
ENG
ES A
ND
TH
E IT
HA
RD P
ROBL
EM A
REA
S
ALGORITHMSAND
APPLICATIO
NS
HARDWARE
TECHNOLOGIES
HIGH
CONFIDENCE
IT
HIGH-END
COMPUTING
SYSTEMS
HUMANAUGMENTATIO
NIT
INFORMATIO
N
MANAGEMENT INTELLIG
ENTSYST
EMS
IT SYST
EMDESIG
N
IT U
SABIL
ITY IT
WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT
OFIT
NETWORKS SOFTWARE
TECHNOLOGIES
9
IT H
AR
D P
RO
BL
EM
AR
EA
S
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF THE NITRD ILLUSTRATIVE GRAND CHALLENGES
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Organize and make broadly availabledistributed resources such assupercomputers, data archives, distantexperimental facilities, and domain-specific research tools to enable newscientific discoveries and education acrossdisciplines and geography
Focus in the Next Ten YearsUnderstand the needs of scientists andhow science is changing (for example,data sets are more complex and teams aremore interdisciplinary)
Increase access to computing systems,archives, instruments, and facilities
Build on successful experiments:• Upper Atmospheric Research
Collaboratory (UARC) and SpacePhysics and Aeronomy ResearchCollaboratory (SPARC)
• Network for Earthquake EngineeringSimulations (NEES)
• Biomedical Informatics ResearchNetwork (BIRN)
• National Virtual Observatory (NVO)
BenefitsNew discoveries across disciplines (forexample, discoveries in one field canapply to other fields)
Establish new fields of science andengineering
Relationship to National Priorities Leadership in Science and Technology• Help maintain U.S. leadership in a
wide range of science, engineering,and technology disciplines
National and Homeland Security• Safety and security will become
increasingly dependent on advances inscience and engineering
Health and Environment• Improved water quality and
human health
A Well-Educated Populace• Boon to K-12, undergraduate, and
graduate education• Boon to underdeveloped regions
within the United States and around the world
A Vibrant Civil Society• The social sciences and the humanities
also use these environments (forexample, museums make 3-D imagesof ancient artifacts)
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Modeling and simulation throughout
science and engineering
Complex Heterogeneous Systems• Control of science and engineering
experiments• Embedded systems for science and
engineering data collection andexperiments
Hardware Technologies• Mass storage technologies • Biological and nanoscale technologies
applied to sensors
4.1 KNOWLEDGE ENVIRONMENTS FORSCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
12
High Confidence IT• Security• Reliability• Trust tools embedded in applications• Policy-enabled infrastructures (for
example, protocols, policies, andmechanisms for sharing resources, andthe embedding of scheduling inknowledge environments)
High-End Computing Systems• HEC systems for applications that
require computationally-intensivemodeling and simulation
Human Augmentation IT• Presence and awareness tools
embedded in applications used inremote collaboration such asteleoperation
Information Management• Creation and management of massive
data and information repositories• Data analysis tools
Intelligent Systems• Knowledge discovery in massive
databases of archived knowledge
IT System Design• Interoperability• Scalability of tools and environments as
the number of users and sites increase
IT Usability• Managing screen real estate to aid
experimenters, data analyzers, and forchat facilities
IT Workforce• Advanced IT for technicians
Management of IT• Copyright restrictions to collecting and
harvesting knowledge• Software and infrastructure standards
Networks• Reliable, secure networks with
differentiated services• Bandwidth for international
collaborations
Software Technologies• Software that recognizes different
individual and group roles in scienceand engineering
Indications of ProgressMore users of distributed science andengineering environments
More distributed science and engineeringcollaborations
More scientists and engineers in remoteparts of the country
New tools and applications for more areasof science and engineering
New science and engineering ideas andinnovations
Scientists and engineers achieve theirgoals more efficiently and effectively
More “hands-on” science education in K-12 and undergraduate school
13
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Improve the efficiency of the combustionof fossil fuels, which are the dominantsource of energy in the United States
Make our environment healthier byreducing greenhouse gas emissions
Focus in the Next Ten YearsOptimize the design of combustionengines
Improve catalysis—trapping of pollutinggases produced by combustion engines—to minimize emissions
Understand the impact of emissions onglobal climate
BenefitsImprove the design of engines andturbines
Reduce greenhouse gas build-up andglobal warming, which could result inrising ocean levels
Improve human health by removingcancer-causing agents in by-products ofcombustion
Relationship to National PrioritiesLeadership in Science and Technology• Remain at the forefront in designing
advanced simulation tools• Advance the science of combustion• Simulate an entire internal combustion
engine
National and Homeland Security• Reduce dependence on foreign oil
Health and Environment• Reduce emissions of carbon and
other pollutants
Economic Prosperity• Fuel consumption has smaller demand
on the economy
4.2 CLEAN ENERGY PRODUCTION THROUGHIMPROVED COMBUSTION
14
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Model the interactions of solids and
gases, the moving boundary betweenthem, and the changing geometries ofan internal combustion engine
• Incorporate complex nonlinearinteractions of hundreds of chemicalspecies in order to correctly predictpollutant production
• Move from laboratory scale modeling(for example, table-top size engineburning pre-mixed fuel in a particularway with by-products measured bylasers) to modeling a diesel engine withcomplex geometry under less thanlaboratory-quality conditions, with 10times more species and reactions,multiple time and space scales, andgreater difficulty predicting soot andother by-products
High-End Computing Systems• Research in high-performance
computing systems architectures thatsupport multiphysics applications withirregular memory access patterns
Information Management• Coherent database of kinetic and
thermo-chemical reactions developedfrom a large number of distributedsources of varying quality
Management of IT• Sequester data in the general model
from proprietary data that belong todifferent companies
Indications of ProgressAccuracy of predictive models
Technology transfer
Increased fuel efficiency as tracked inCAFE standards
Reduction in pollutant production15
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Ensure the continuous, safe operation ofthe Nation’s infrastructure systems such asthe power grid, water supply, andtransportation systems
Protect against malicious attacks, physicalfailures, and complex cascading failures
Focus for the Next Ten YearsSupervisory Control and Data Acquisition(SCADA) systems
Transformation of legacy systems tocapable, resilient IT-enabledinfrastructures
Coordinated decentralized supervisorycontrol of new forms of distributedinfrastructure such as air traffic controland transportation scheduling
Supervisory control of advanced powergrid technologies (for example,distributed power generation andadvanced devices for controllingalternating current (AC) transmissionsystems)
BenefitsRobust, survivable infrastructures that canprovably withstand broad classes ofmalicious attacks and failures
Higher capacity systems through refinedmanagement of safety margins
Ability to isolate failures more easily,prevent widespread disruption, andreduce impact of failures
Relationship to National PrioritiesNational Security• Information warfare • Military command, control, and
communications
Homeland Security• Critical infrastructure protection
Economic Prosperity• Trustworthy infrastructure and energy
independence
A Vibrant Civil Society• Modern society requires reliable
infrastructure
4.3 HIGH CONFIDENCE INFRASTRUCTURECONTROL SYSTEMS
16
IT Hard Problem AreasComplex Heterogeneous Systems• Understand and balance simultaneous
conflicting interacting requirements:Tolerate failures (known as fault-tolerance)Recover within time constraintsMaintain security while recovering from failures
• Understand and control emergent(hard to predict) behavior in SCADAsystems. Local interactions can lead toglobal-scale instability.
High Confidence IT• Integrate security (authentication,
access control, intrusion detection) intonetworked embedded systems where ithas never existed
• Establish a new paradigm of operatingat acceptable levels through attacks.Shutting down to thwart attacks is notan option.
Networks• Secure and survivable networks
Indications of ProgressDecrease mean time to recovery (MTTR)to increase availability
Fewer and smaller scale failures
17
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Improve patient care through saferevidence-based medicine and reducedmedical errors
Link patient information with medicalknowledge to improve the decisions ofhealth care providers and their patients
Focus in the Next Ten YearsIncrease awareness of the magnitude ofthe problem of medical errors andpotential solutions
Establish uniform medical reportingrequirements to enable analysis andfeedback
Collect and analyze medical error data toenable patient safety research
Learn how to reduce errors in the healthindustry by studying other industries. Forexample, the airline industry requirespilots to report near misses.
Educate the population about whatquestions to ask medical professionals
BenefitsImproved health care quality and patientrecovery. For example, workers can goback to work more quickly and the elderlycan live longer in their own homes
A health care IT infrastructure thatsupports continuous improvements.Examples are bar-coded drugs, nursinguse of time stamps, and use of radiofrequency identification devices.
Efficient use of health care resources
Analysis system to monitor improvementswhile protecting confidentiality
Relationship to National PrioritiesHealth and Environment• Improved health of the American
people and better use of resources
Economic Prosperity• Improved quality of life
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Modeling and simulation of
medical errors
High Confidence IT • Security and privacy for health
information including authorization,authentication, biometrics,certification, encryption, and interfaces
Human Augmentation IT• Scalable interoperable use of
prompts, alerts, and reminders bydoctors and patients
4.4 IMPROVED PATIENT SAFETY AND HEALTH QUALITY
18
Information Management• Data, information, and knowledge
management to support evidence-based decision making
• Data mining and data warehousing todevelop and enrich knowledge aboutpatient safety
Intelligent Systems• Human language technology such as
common medical terminology toenable accurate communication andoptimum decision making
IT System Design• Interoperability of health
information systems within hospitals,across providers, and among otherstakeholders such as insurancecompanies, accreditation committees,and governments
IT Usability• User interfaces that provide prompts,
alerts, and reminders at the time andpoint of medical decision making
• Designs that vary for users of differentskill levels and experience
Management of IT• Public support for open source
electronic health records to encourageinnovative applications
• Economic, legal, policy, and socialimplications of the use of IT in patient safety
Networks• Networking management, reliability,
and scalability, to expand successfulpatient safety improvements nationallyand internationally
Software Technologies• Health information software
requirements, engineering, anddevelopment
• Software reliability, performance, andquality assurance
Indications of ProgressReported medical errors first rise asreporting improves then fall in severity as more organizations systematicallyreport errors
Reduced mortality and illness due tomedical errors
New evidence-based tools for healthcareproviders. For example, a clearinghousefor healthcare quality measures.
Industry decisions about purchasinghealth care plans that incorporate patientsafety research results
19
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Provide decision makers with timelyknowledge developed throughcomprehensive assessments ofobservations, models, and theories of theimpacts of regional-level climate changeto help them select the best adaptationand mitigation strategies
Focus in the Next Ten YearsProvide science-based information toinform the public debate about the effectsof climate change and what to do about it
Reduce uncertainty in climate forecasts toenable common understanding andimprove the prospects of consensus
Identify possible alternative futures andpaths to those futures (global warmingcould cause ice to melt and ocean levelsto rise and warrant reduced constructionnear ocean beaches)
Improve decision-making in national andinternational arenas
Identify opportunities to manage the risksor mitigate the effects of climate change
BenefitsImproved long-term decision makingbased on predicted regional climatechange
Relationship to National PrioritiesLeadership in Science and Technology • Ability to predict climate change and
evaluate alternative scenarios
Health and Environment• Viable health and climate
Economic Prosperity• Viable agriculture industry
A well-Educated Populace• Inform the public debate
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Modeling of the environment
including atmosphere, oceans, andbiological systems under conditions ofchanging composition
• Scaling of algorithms, efficientparallelization, and communicationamong neighboring nodes
Hardware Technologies• Faster computers, access to results, and
nanoscale data storage
High Confidence IT• Security• Models that run for long periods of
time on computers that do not crash
4.5 INFORMED STRATEGIC PLANNING FORLONG-TERM REGIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE
20
High-End Computing Systems • High-resolution regional
climate models require massivecomputing power
• Access grids, data grids, andvisualization grids for tighter couplingbetween the large distributed climatecommunity and large but lessdistributed computing, storage, andvisualization resources, and to enableregional models to access globalclimate data
• Ensembles may be run over grids
Human Augmentation IT• Help humans “get their heads around”
huge data sets
Information Management• Access to and data warehousing, data
mining, and knowledge managementof multi-decade multi-disciplinary data sets
Intelligent Systems• Automated ways of diagnosing and
organizing data• Assess data across multiple disciplines• Multiple language access for the
international arena
IT System Design• Interoperability across diverse
communities and diverse platforms• Earth systems modeling framework
portable to major architectures
IT Usability• Interfaces that let users ranging from
climate scientists to decision makersinteract in ways that are natural to each group
IT Workforce• Decision makers need to use advanced
IT without becoming IT experts
Management of IT• Database intellectual property issues• Community moving toward open
source due to small size of high-endcomputing market
Networks• Sensor networks
Software Technologies• Enable diverse community of
researchers ranging from modelers todata managers to work together
Indications of ProgressAccuracy of predictive models
Technology transfer
Broad agreement in national andinternational communities
A viable economy in the 22nd centuryand beyond
21
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Predict what ensembles of atoms andmolecules will do at the nanoscale
Assemble ensembles of atoms andmolecules into new devices
Focus in the Next Ten YearsSimulate from first principles thefundamental behavior of ensembles ofatoms and molecules
Design and manufacture molecular scale devices• Apply physical properties to grow
large quantities of self-organizingnanoscale materials by chemicalreactions (examples are nanotubes and nanowires)
• Fabricate these materials into useful devices
• Detect and correct faults in nanoscale materials
Nanoscale computers• Distributed control of processing
elements in nanoscale computers—themany small unsophisticated elementswill need to synchronize with eachother directly rather than have acentral clock
• Understand and apply nanoscale signaltransport to nanoscale computer I/O
BenefitsA second Industrial Revolution
Relationship to National Priorities Leadership in Science and Technology• Ability to predict nanoscale
behavior and manufacture reliablenanoscale devices
National and Homeland Security• “Smart dust”—simple nanoscale
sensors that blanket a battlefield tomonitor movement of troops orpathogens and enable commanders tobetter plan attacks
Health and Environment• New pharmaceutical drugs, new
microbes for environmentalremediation, etc.
Economic Prosperity• New materials and devices with
new magnetic properties, greaterstrength, etc.
4.6 NANOSCALE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: EXPLORE AND EXPLOIT THE BEHAVIOR OF ENSEMBLESOF ATOMS AND MOLECULES
22
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Modeling and simulation to
understand the transition betweennanoscale and microscale behavior,which will enable the application ofnovel emergent nanoscale behavior todevices with 1,000 to one million atoms
Hardware Technologies• Nanoscale technologies• Denser storage
High-End Computing Systems• Nanoscale technologies applied to
high-end computing systems
Human Augmentation IT• Materials to augment human
capabilities (an example is clothingthat camouflages by changing color)
IT System Design• Continue to decrease component size
Networks• Development of sensor networks
Indications of ProgressNumber of atoms in nano-object whoseproperties can be predicted
Length of time that a nanoscale devicecan be simulated
Density of storage media
Development of designer materials andpharmaceuticals
23
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Better understand how pollutants aretransported and transformed in theenvironment
Predict how pollutants reach people andhow they affect human health
Focus in the Next Ten YearsBetter understand the movement ofpollutants across boundaries (forexample, transfer through skin) and howpollutants are transformed in the body
Better predict the response of genes, cells,organs, and people to pollutants
BenefitsMore efficiently and effectively identifyand reduce health risks
Quicker approval for use of safe new compounds
Reduced need for laboratory animal testing
Relationship to National PrioritiesLeadership in Science and Technology• Advance scientific learning about
health risks and develop technologiesto address them
• Help maintain U.S. leadership ingenomics, toxicology, andenvironmental science
National and Homeland Security• Better respond to disasters such as
mass releases of dangerous chemicals
Health and Environment• Reduced environmental health risks
Economic Prosperity• Faster approval for materials
determined to be of low rather thanhigh risk (for example, a low-riskpesticide)
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Modeling and simulation of the
environment, people, and theirinteractions
• Communication between simulations ofdifferent scales such as pollutant effectsin cells vs. organs
Complex Heterogeneous Systems• Environmental sensors need IT
advancements
High Confidence IT• Protecting the privacy of human
health data
4.7 PREDICTING PATHWAYS AND HEALTHEFFECTS OF POLLUTANTS
24
High-End Computing• Grid computing• Make HEC systems more usable by
making codes run more efficiently ondifferent architectures
Human Augmentation IT• Visualize modeling and simulation
results to see patterns in complexdatasets
• Better collaboration among people ofdifferent disciplines and in differentlocations
Information Management• Holistic approach to different
disciplines and their data (alternative iscustom programming)
• Manage and store large data sets forlong periods of time so that the datacan be read decades from now
• Data mining to find new patterns ornew information (for example,examine health and environmentaldata to identify risks of exposure topollutants)
Intelligent Systems• Generate and represent new
knowledge to be shared and integratedacross disciplines
IT Usability• Human computer interfaces and
interactions with data collection tools(such as gene chip arrays), the datathey produce, and data analysis ofcomplex data sets
IT Workforce• Environmental scientists such as
biologists need to use advanced ITwithout becoming IT experts
• Interdisciplinary interactions betweenIT specialists such as computerscientists and non-IT specialists whodepend on IT such as biologists,chemists, ecologists, economists, andmeteorologists
Networks• Grid R&D to make distributed IT
resources easily usable by non-specialists
Software Technologies• Build systems of models (for example,
chemical, environmental, skin, andinside the body) that interact in well-defined manners
• Model development by non-softwareengineers
Indications of ProgressReduced health risks
Reduced cost and time to screenchemicals for harmful effects
Better predictions of sub-populations thatare sensitive to pollutants
25
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Locate and assess the source and level ofnatural (earthquakes, hurricanes, etc.) orman-made (chemical, biological, andradiological hazards) threats, and respondrapidly to minimize loss of life andproperty
Focus in the Next Ten YearsHeating, ventilation, and air conditioning(HVAC) and water systems able to identifyand respond to meteorological, weather,chemical, biological, and radiologicalhazards
Networks of semi-autonomous robots forhazard removal
More accurate predictions of micro effectsof natural and man-made threats
BenefitsIncreased safety and security of theenvironment with reduced susceptibilityto threats
Safety and security of publicinfrastructure and physical systems suchas water supply, communications lines, airterminals, office buildings, etc.
Safer technologies for hazard removal
Relationship to National PrioritiesNational and Homeland Security• Minimize the impact of terrorists
threats or attacks
Health and the Environment• Safer environment
Economic Prosperity• Better quality of life• Fewer disruptions with less impact on
the economy
4.8 REAL-TIME DETECTION, ASSESSMENT, ANDRESPONSE TO NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREATS
26
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Modeling and simulation for:
Threat assessment, location, andresponsePredicting earthquakes, floods, tornados, etc.Complex physical systems in realtime (for example, airflow in anairport terminal)
Complex Heterogeneous Systems• Heterogeneous sensors, networks, and
computing systems• Distributed control of networks of
autonomous and semi-autonomousrobotic responders
High-End Computing• Faster architectures for demanding
modeling and simulation
Human Augmentation IT• Collaboration and visualization
technologies for responders
Information Management• Asynchronous collecting and
processing of large numbers ofindependent data streams
Intelligent Systems• Reasoning, cooperating robotic
responders
Networks• Deploy, manage, and monitor large-
scale dynamically reconfigurablenetworks of heterogeneous detectors
• Fault-tolerant sensors and robots,enabling systems to survive and recover
Indications of ProgressNetwork size and richness of topology
Mean time to detection, location, andresponse
Ability to model smaller-scale naturaldisasters (wind shear, for example)
27
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Analyze long-term transportation needsand alternative solutions and their costs
Design, construct, operate, and maintainan integrated multi-modal transportationsystem that is safer, more secure, moreefficient, and has higher capacity than today
Focus in the Next Ten YearsFacilitate commuter and traveler time,cost, and safety
Analysis of long-term needs and costs (forexample, compare the cost of buildingand maintaining subway systems to thecost of building and maintaining highwaysystems and highway vehicles)
Intelligent vehicles that maintain safe distances
Automated highway systems that increase capacity
Intelligent passenger screening systems
City-wide timing of traffic lights to enablehigher capacity and fast, effective reactionto accidents
Synchronized scheduling of publictransportation systems (airplanes, trains,subways, and buses) so more people canget to their destinations faster
Airplanes controlled by pilots rather thanair traffic control centers, to increaseairspace and airport capacity
Faster trains (bullet and magneticlevitation)
Innovative transportation systems such as SegWay™, unmanned air vehicles(UAVs), and highly-automated personalair vehicles
Integrate modes (for example, subwaysthat go to train stations and airports withon-demand service)
Standards for software-centrictransportation systems to enable fastersafety and security certification
BenefitsTravelers save time and have increasedflexibility in scheduling travel
Governments expend fewer resources onbuilding, maintaining, and securing ourtransportation systems
Improved safety due to reliable andintelligent transportation system
Lower insurance rates as the systembecomes safer
Relationship to National PrioritiesHealth and Environment• Minimize the impact of vehicle
pollution on human health and theenvironment
• Decrease consumption of gas and oilEconomic Prosperity• Lower commercial and government
cost of moving people and goods• More productive economy due to less
time spent commuting and traveling
4.9 SAFER, MORE SECURE, MORE EFFICIENT, HIGHER-CAPACITY, MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
28
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Modeling and simulation of current
and evolving transportation systems• Better optimization of transportation
Complex Heterogeneous Systems• Sensors and actuators embedded in
highway systems, vehicles, etc., tomaintain safe distances betweenvehicles of different sizes and undervarious weather conditions
High Confidence IT• Available, reliable, safe, secure
air traffic, highway, railway, andshipping systems
• Smart cards to authorize andauthenticate transportation systempersonnel
Information Management• Data mining of transportation
system information for increased safetyand security
Intelligent Systems• Intelligent vehicles
IT System Design• Integration of diverse transportation
systems
IT Usability• Address a vast range of operator and
user needs
Management of IT• Standards• Certification of systems and procedures
Networks• Reliable, secure mobile networks• Faster, smaller, lighter-weight sensor
networks
Software Technologies• Software for developing and operating
integrated transportation systems
Indications of ProgressReduced time and cost to validate andverify IT components of transportationsystems
Reduced time and cost to certify newtechnologies
Reduced time and cost for system-levelcertification and accreditation
29
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Conduct scientific experiments tounderstand the broad politico-socio-economic-technical impact of increasedhuman use of constantly changing digitaltechnologies. These experiments canaddress questions such as:• What is the impact on people who
are left out?• Should digital participation be
universal?• What kind of technologies should
be deployed?• Does digital information work
everywhere?• What are the public policy
implications?
Focus in the Next Ten YearsLongitudinal studies of socio-technicaltransformation such as at Blacksburg(Virginia) Village
Map global social transformation (such asin homes, educational institutions,communities, and from e-business)
Understand intended and unintendedconsequences of a digital society
BenefitsPotential for all to participate
Better predict human behavior in adigital society and intended andunintended consequences
Maximize intended consequences such as enhanced economic productivity,and better, faster innovation andknowledge creation
Minimize unintended consequences such as the digital divide and personalidentity theft
Optimize societal transformations
Relationship to National PrioritiesLeadership in Science and Technology• Broader participation in science and
technology
National and Homeland Security• Strong social networks to enhance trust
and security
Health and Environment• New knowledge about healthcare
Economic Prosperity• Productive industries, e-commerce,
skilled workforce
A Well-Educated Populace• More people can use IT in
their learning• More on-line learning institutions
A Vibrant Civil Society• Tight communities with strong
social networks• On-line voting
4.10 ANTICIPATE CONSEQUENCES OF UNIVERSALPARTICIPATION IN A DIGITAL SOCIETY
30
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Model digital societies and
transformations
Complex Heterogeneous Systems• Complexity and emergent behavior
may be similar in IT and social systems
High Confidence IT• Security, privacy, and trust
High-End Computing Systems• Universal participation will be over
the grid
Human Augmentation IT• Increase human sensory bandwidth, for
example by equipping into the ears ofthe blind to take in what eyes do
Information Management• Research in domains such as digital
libraries and museums is central
Intelligent Systems• Better care for more of the elderly
through a wide variety of remoteintelligent technologies (for example,smart homes and computers that talk)
IT System Design• Society will in part drive IT evolution
and the IT evolution will changesociety
IT Usability• Technologies to enable universal
participation
IT Workforce• Workforce skilled in analyzing
sociological impact of the transition toa digital society
Management of IT• Open source to help fulfill needs• Intellectual property and copyright
issues
Networks• Mobile networks to enhance
universal participation• Last mile problem• Planning that acknowledges that the
fabric of civil society and the fabric ofthe IT infrastructure are intertwined
Software Technologies• New programming methods that let
programmers design for propertiessuch as privacy or surveillance
• A science of software that obeysMoore’s Law, which states thatcomputing performance roughlydoubles every 18 months while chipsize, power, etc., remain constant
• Composability of software modulesdeveloped by different organizations
Indications of ProgressBetter anticipate consequences
Better understand how unintendedconsequences emerge and developremediation strategies
31
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Understand how people, (software)agents, robots, and sensors (PARS)contribute to a collaboration
Understand the structural complexity ofPARS collaborations (for example, teams,networks, or hierarchies into which thePARS components can self-organize)
Design architectures in which PARScomponents self-organize for optimalconcerted social/physical/technologicalactions useful to society (for example,manage a crisis, perform surgery, or teachchildren)
Focus in the Next Ten YearsDistributed intelligence
Knowledge representation, management,fusion, and synthesis
Science of coordination (for example,centralized versus decentralizedorganization) and division of labor
Science of collaboration
Mixed human-computer initiative withadjustable autonomy. (For example, eithera person or a robot can start an action,but who is the decision maker? How doesone override the other? If a robot detectslife-threatening information, how does italert the human to flee?)
Understand and interpret implicit signals.(Computers have been explicit but humanshave affects (emotions) that they reveal infacial expressions or tone of voice, forexample. How do agents and robots readthese affects, and how do they responddifferently when conveying commands,suggestions, hints, or urgency?)
Empirical experiments (for example, how humans and robots interact in a crisisor disaster)
BenefitsAbility to rapidly convene coalitions torespond to crises or massive failures ofsystems such as the electrical power grid
Smart homes, hospitals, highways,classrooms, schools, etc.
Remote health care monitoring and care delivery
Dramatic increase in productivity of theservice economy
Manufacturing at the intersection of massproduction (making it cheaper, therebybenefiting the manufacturer) andcustomization (benefiting the consumer)
Relationship to National PrioritiesLeadership in Science and Technology• Distributed entities on the Internet or
the grid organized to collaborate (forexample, robots in Antarctica)
National Security• War fighters and information
technologies coordinate andcollaborate
Health and Environment• Health infrastructure (for example, fill
prescriptions on line)• Telemedicine (sensors in homes,
hospitals, diagnostic sensors, etc.)• Smart aids for the elderly
Economic Prosperity• Increase productivity along value chain
of manufacturers and service providers
4.11 COLLABORATIVE INTELLIGENCE: INTEGRATINGHUMANS WITH INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES
32
A Well-Educated Populace• Pedagogical agents for individual
students or student teams• Collaborative learning environments• Lifelong learning• Integrated research and education• Teachers and students remotely control
instruments such as advancedtelescopes and microscopes
A Vibrant Civil Society• Distributed communities with
common interests
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Model interactions between humans
and intelligent technologies
Complex Heterogeneous Systems• Implement interactions and decision
making among people, agents, robots,and sensors
• Control of interactions with physicalsystems
High Confidence IT• Data and information security
Human Augmentation IT• Augment human cognition and
augment reality with input fromagents, robots, and sensors
• Collaboration environments and tools
Information Management• Knowledge management for
distributed intelligence• Natural languages for communication
between humans and intelligenttechnologies
Intelligent Systems• Cognitive systems aware of context and
human affects
IT System Design• Self-organizing architectures• Interoperability
IT Usability• User interfaces developed from
knowledge of human behavior andhuman interaction with agents, robots,and sensors
IT Workforce• Train non-IT specialists to work with
agents, robots, and sensors
Management of IT• May need open source if humans
and robots write different softwarecomponents
Networks• Mobile networks (such as for crises
or disasters)• Reconfigurable networking to support
ad-hoc alliances• Reliability and scalability
Software Technologies• May need new programming
languages
Indications of ProgressTime savings
Improved outcomes
Better, faster scientific discovery
Achieve goals of larger scale in selecteddomains than are possible today
33
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Rapidly and spontaneously retrieveaccurate insights:• Locate information from multiple text
sources, archived databases, imagearchives, and sensor streams for aperson or team solving a problem
• Identify and organize connectionsbetween disparate pieces ofinformation
• Validate or refute hypotheses andovercome human biases abouthypotheses
Focus in the Next Ten YearsAutomate the collection of metadata,which are data about data (for example,description of fields in a database andhow the data were collected andprocessed) as the data are collected
Develop taxonomies (classification in anordered system to indicate relationships)1
for information in different forms (text,images, video, time series, etc.)
BenefitsMore rapid decision making
Greater accuracy due to using multiplesources and points of view
Faster progress in science throughunderstanding the implications ofindividual findings and linking findings together
More national and internationalinterdisciplinary cooperation anddiscovery (for example, globally connectpeople who generated related results,identify researchers in similar fields)
Relationship to National PrioritiesLeadership in Science and Technology• More rapid scientific discovery across
disciplines
National and Homeland Security• Better insights into crises as
they happen• Assessment of intelligence data
Health and the Environment• Integrate public health data• Understand the ecosystem
Economic Prosperity• New products and processes and more
efficient supply chains due tounderstanding and analyzinginformation more efficiently
• Making good information more readilyavailable is essential to today’sInformation Economy
4.12 GENERATING INSIGHTS FROM INFORMATIONAT YOUR FINGERTIPS
34
__________________________________________________________________________________________
1 American Heritage Dictionary of the EnglishLanguage, Houghton Mifflin, 2000.
IT Hard Problem AreasComplex Heterogeneous Systems• Rapidly collect, analyze, and draw
conclusions about information frommultiple sources such as SCADAsystems and networks of sensors
High Confidence IT• Confidentiality of proprietary
information
Information Management• Comprehensive ability to find and
analyze information on disparatetopics, from disparate sources, and ofvarying quality
• Preservation of metadata
Intelligent Systems• Automated tools that either start with
an initial hypothesis and look forsupporting evidence or look foralternative hypotheses and find dataand information to support or refutesuch hypotheses
• Automated tools to analyzeinformation and identify causalrelationships
• Analyze and present information inmultiple languages
IT Usability• Interact with a wide variety of users
who have a wide variety of inquiriesand presentation preferences
Networks• Ad-hoc networking• Sensornets
Indications of ProgressStandard information retrieval metricssuch as precision (the proportion ofretrieved items that are relevant) andrecall (the proportion of relevant itemsthat are retrieved)
Time to perform a task
Ability to understand something better
Industry interest in adopting thesetechnologies to improve productivity
35
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Establish management practices thatenable knowledge-intensive organizationsto use structured global collections ofknowledge to make complex decisionsthat result in rapid reconfiguration ofprocesses, and rescheduling andredeployment of resources, to respondquickly to changing circumstances
Maintain stability and achieve peakperformance in knowledge-intensiveorganizations characterized by uncertaintyand constant change
Focus in the Next Ten YearsSimulate knowledge-intensiveenvironments involving hundreds ofcomplex interacting agents
Validate simulations with realorganizational data (for example,instrument parts of organizations to see iftheory underlying simulations holds true)
Develop and evaluate new real-timeinformation systems for knowledge-intensive environments
Catalogue lessons learned to identify bestpractices for managing dynamicenvironments
BenefitsOrganizations function more smoothly
Best use of resources
Peak performance during times ofconstant change
Relationship to National PrioritiesNational and Homeland Security• Reengineer intelligence agencies to
handle uncertainty and change
Health and Environment• Help hospitals better respond to
emergencies
Economic Prosperity• Increase organizational productivity
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Model change in knowledge-intensive
environments
Complex Heterogeneous Systems• Rapid reconfiguration and
rescheduling of human and machineresources
• Information sharing and distributeddecision-making in organizationalhierarchies
4.13 MANAGING KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVEORGANIZATIONS IN DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS
36
High Confidence IT• Intelligence agencies need data and
information to be stored in a securefashion, retrieved in a timely manner,and transported safely and correctly.
High-End Computing Systems• Intelligence agencies have some of the
most demanding knowledge-management needs, which requirehigh-end computing.
Human Augmentation IT• Improve complex decision making
through augmented cognition andaugmented reality, collaboration, andvisualization of large knowledgecollections
Information Management• Scalable distributed processing
and storage
Intelligent Systems• Collaborative knowledge discovery,
retrieval, representation, andintegration to make inferences
• How do we best gather, represent, andshare knowledge about sources,designs, scheduling, customer profiles,process status, energy, and geo-politics?
IT System Design• Maintain system stability and
predictability when everything is in flux• Best mechanisms for negotiating
protocols (plug-and-play is still a dream)
IT Usability• User interfaces for displaying complex
structured knowledge
IT Workforce• Understand workflow rules (which may
be hidden)
Management of IT• Intellectual property issues• Open source issues
Networks• Reconfigure networks (people
everywhere need access to networkeddevices on the fly)
Software Technologies• This new area may require new
software languages, etc.
Indications of ProgressImproved decision making
Meet deadlines
Integrate and balance change and stability
Quicker reaction times
37
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Develop computational models of howpeople acquire language • Use acquisition modeling, along with
empirical data, to understand firstlanguage acquisition by children andlater acquisition of other languages
• Use acquisition modeling to advanceunderstanding of the structure oflanguages and how they relate tohuman cognitive processes
Use best models of acquisition to develop tools• Use acquisition models to develop
courses and computerized tutoringsystems for language learning
• Apply knowledge from acquisitionmodels to develop advanced machinetranslation and automated languageinformation extraction
Focus for the Next Ten YearsDevelop and test partial models oflanguage acquisition phenomena
Merge partial models into a unifiedmodel of language acquisition
Experiment with different learningmodels (such as reinforcement,evolutionary, clustering, and supervised)to develop an overall natural languagelearning model
BenefitsBetter understanding of how people learnlanguages and similar skills
Better ways of teaching—bothautomatically and via individualizedhuman instruction
Systems to help immigrants acquireEnglish proficiency
Relationship to National PrioritiesLeadership in Science and Technology• Maintain U.S. leadership in linguistics,
cognitive psychology, and artificialintelligence
National and Homeland Security• Translation devices, language data
mining, language training, intelligence gathering
A Well-Educated Populace • Use both a first language and later
languages more effectively
A Vibrant Civil Society• Better human language
communication
4.14 RAPIDLY ACQUIRING PROFICIENCY INNATURAL LANGUAGES
38
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Model how languages link to
knowledge and model learning of languages
Complex Heterogeneous Systems• Robots respond to natural
language input• Multi-language systems
Human Augmentation IT• Assist people who have learning
disabilities or linguistic handicaps• Assist people with problems in
acquiring non-native languages
Information Management• Create and manage large corpora of
latitudinal language learning data fortesting acquisition models
Intelligent Systems• Sharpen knowledge of machine
learning and how different types ofmachine learning can be combined tolearn languages
• Convert large unstructured humanlanguage databases to structureddatabases (for example, to enablesuccessful searching)
IT Usability• Computer interfaces that adapt
to user input
Indications of ProgressModels that show how the human worldview is structured by language and howlanguage structures world view
Better model-based systems for teaching languages
Improvements in information extractionfrom natural language data
Databases that track facts (what, why, how,when, where, who?)
Industry uptake of language acquisition models and the languagemodels they imply
39
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
Learn about our world and beyond byexploring what happens in interoperableplug-and-play learning modules thatsimulate various aspects of the universe• Modules have various levels of
expertise and assume various levels ofuser knowledge
• Can be used by people of all ages andexpertise
Focus in the Next Ten YearsInitial modules for biological systems (forexample, blood or digestive system),weather, and planetary system
Modules for grade school throughgraduate school and for lifelong learning
BenefitsMore effective learning environment
Inexpensive resources available to alllearning institutions
Evens out the education system across the country
Relationship to National PrioritiesLeadership in Science and Technology• Train the next generation of
researchers and workforce
Health and Environment• Simulation helps people better
understand the effects of disease andthe effects of pollutants in theenvironment
Economic Prosperity• A better educated citizenry contributes
more to society
A Well-Educated Populace• All of society benefits from educated
citizens
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• Simulation of all systems in the
universe
Human Augmentation IT• Visualizations of simulations
IT System Design• Robust self-evolving, self-maintaining,
interoperable modules
IT Usability• Interfaces for different levels of
expertise• Maximize the time spent interacting
with content, not with the interface
Software Technologies• End user programming so that non-
professional users can create their ownsimulations and modules
Indications of ProgressNumber of modules contributed toSimUniverse
Number of SimUniverse users
Improved standardized test scores
Increased number of masters degrees andPhDs in science and technology
New scientific discoveries
Increased quality in scholarly papers
4.15 SIMUNIVERSE: LEARNING BY EXPLORING
40
41
4.16 VIRTUAL LIFETIME TUTOR FOR ALL
Description of the Multi-DecadeGrand Challenge
A personal tutor that understands what auser knows and does not know, providesjust-in-time tutoring as needed, adapts toa user’s learning style and knowledgelevel, and is initiated by either the user orthe tutor
Focus in the Next Ten YearsEmploy a model of the user (strengths,weaknesses, preferred learning methods)and machine learning to tailor a general-purpose tutor for a variety of knowledgedomains and expertise that can adapt tothe user’s capabilities and learning needsfrom birth
Identify and begin work on topics such as:• Practical how-to training for the
workforce. For example, computerskills for novices to experienced users,learning new software languages bybuilding on languages one alreadyknows, or a refresher to maintain skills.
• Foreign languages. For example,develop a tutor that can teach Spanishto people ranging in age from 3 to 103.
BenefitsA better educated populace
Customized learning environments at lower cost
Relationship to National PrioritiesEconomic Prosperity • Just-in-time training
A Well-Educated Populace• Better educated workforce
A Vibrant Civil Society • All of society benefits from
educated citizens
IT Hard Problem AreasAlgorithms and Applications• User modeling
Human Augmentation IT• Context-aware information delivery
Information Management• Adding in new content modules
Intelligent Systems• Understand human cognition• Human language technology
IT System Design • Evolve the tutor to new platforms with
little user involvement
IT Usability• Adaptable user interfaces for different
levels of user expertise
Indications of ProgressImproved productivity
Increased participation in communityactivities
Increased understanding of other culturesand societies
Increased return on investment foreducation funding
APPENDICES
For each IT hard problem area, the GrandChallenges Task Force identified one or moreillustrative IT hard problems. Progresstoward the grand challenges will requirebreakthroughs or solutions to these IT hardproblems. Specific examples are given in thedescription of the grand challenges inchapter 4.
Algorithms and ApplicationsModeling and simulation
Complex Heterogeneous SystemsAdaptive scheduling and control
Complex systems/emergent behavior
Control of physical systems includingscientific experiments and SCADAsystems
Distributed decision making
Embedded systems including actuators,sensors, and MEMS
Robotics
Hardware TechnologiesBiological technologies
Nanoscale technologies
New mass storage technologies
Quantum technologies
High Confidence ITData and information security
High confidence middleware
High confidence open source
Reliability
Safety
Security including authorization,authentication, biometrics, certification,encryption, interfaces, and protocols
Software assurance
High-End Computing SystemsGrid computing
High-end computing architectures,systems software, and applicationssoftware
Use of biological, nanoscale, andquantum technologies in high-endcomputing systems
Human Augmentation ITAugmented cognition and augmentedreality
Collaboration technologies
Visualization
APPENDIX 1: ILLUSTRATIVE IT HARD PROBLEMS CATEGORIZEDBY IT HARD PROBLEM AREAS
44
Information ManagementAsynchronous collection and processingof independent data streams
Coherent databases developed fromdistributed data of varying quality
Data and information management
Data mining and data warehousing
Distributed processing and storage
Metadata creation and use
Preservation
Intelligent SystemsCognitive systems
Context-aware computing and autonomicnetworks to add more intelligence to ITsystems
Human language technology
Knowledge discovery, representation, and integration
IT System DesignArchitecture
Graceful evolution
Hardware/software co-design
Interoperability
Preservation
IT UsabilityHuman/computer interaction includinguser interfaces
Universal accessibility
IT WorkforceAdvanced IT for non-IT specialists
Interdisciplinary interaction
IT workforce issues
Management of ITIntellectual property issues
Open source issues
Standards
Technology transfer
NetworksAd-hoc networking/reconfigurablenetworking
Grid
Mobility
Network middleware
Networking management, reliability, andscalability
Sensor networks
Software TechnologiesProgramming environments
Programming languages
Software requirements engineering,software development methods and tools,and software engineering
Systems software and middleware
45
NSFAerospace• Coupled field problems
Computer Science• Machine learning• Parallel input/output (I/O) methods for
I/O-intensive grand challenges
Environmental Modeling and Prediction• Large-scale environmental modeling• Adaptive coordination of results of
predictive models with experimentalobservations
• Earthquake ground motion modelingin large basins
• High-performance computing for landcover dynamics
• Massively parallel simulation of large-scale, high-resolution ecosystem
Molecular Biology and BiomedicalImaging• Biomolecular design• Imaging in biological research• Advanced computational approaches to
biomolecular modeling and structuredetermination
• Understanding human joint mechanics through advancedcomputational models
Product Design and Process Optimization• High-capacity atomic-level simulations
for the design of materials
Space Science• Black hole binaries: coalescence and
gravitational radiation• Formation of galaxies and large-
scale structure• Radio synthesis imaging
DOE/SCEnergy• Mathematical combustion modeling• Quantum chromodynamics calculations• Oil reservoir modeling• Numeral Tokamak project
Environmental Monitoring andPrediction• Computational chemistry• Global climate modeling• Groundwater transport and
remediation
Molecular Biology and Biomedical Imaging• Computational structural biology
Product Design and Process Optimization• First-principles simulation of
materials properties
APPENDIX 2: THE HPCC PROGRAM’S GRAND CHALLENGES2
46
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2 The list of the HPCC Program’s grandchallenges appears in “Evolving the HighPerformance Computing and CommunicationsInitiative to Support the Nation’s InformationInfrastructure,” Computer Science andTelecommunications Board, National ResearchCouncil, National Academy Press, Washington,D.C., 1995.
47
NASALarge-scale structure and galaxyformation
Cosmology and accretion astrophysics
Convective turbulence and mixing inastrophysics
Solar activity and heliospheric dynamics
NIHMolecular biology
Biomedical imaging
NISTProduct design and process optimization
EPALinked air and water quality modeling
NOAAClimate change prediction and weather forecasting
48
Knowledge Environments for Science and Engineering—C.S. Iacono (NSF), W. Bainbridge (NSF)
Clean Energy Production Through Improved Combustion—C. Romine (DOE/SC)
High Confidence Infrastructure ControlSystems—G. Koob (DARPA), H. Gill (NSF)
Improved Patient Safety and Health Quality—J.M. Fitzmaurice (AHRQ)
Informed Strategic Planning for Long-Term Regional Climate Change—W. Turnbull (NOAA)
Nanoscale Science and Technology:Explore and Exploit the Behavior ofEnsembles of Molecules and Atoms—C. Romine (DOE/SC)
Predicting Pathways and Health Effects of Pollutants—S. Fine (EPA)
Real-Time Detection, Assessment, andResponse to Natural and Man-MadeThreats—C. Romine (DOE/SC)
APPENDIX 3: NITRD GRAND CHALLENGES AUTHORS ANDCONTRIBUTORS
Safer, More Secure, More Efficient, Higher Capacity Multi-ModalTransportation System—E. Lucier (FAA)
Anticipate the Consequences of UniversalParticipation in a Digital Society—C.S. Iacono (NSF), W. Bainbridge (NSF)
Collaborative Intelligence: IntegratingHumans with Intelligent Technologies—C.S. Iacono (NSF), W. Bainbridge (NSF)
Generating Insights From Information atYour Fingertips—M. Pazzani (NSF)
Managing Knowledge Intensive Dynamic Systems—C.S. Iacono (NSF), W. Bainbridge (NSF)
Rapidly Acquiring Proficiency In NaturalLanguages—L. Reeker (NIST)
SimUniverse: Learning by Exploring—J. Scholtz (NIST)
Virtual Lifetime Tutor for All—J. Scholtz (NIST)
IT Hard Problems Sub-Task Group Chair—B. Wheatley (NSA)
49
AHRQJ. Michael Fitzmaurice, Ph.D., FACMISenior Science Advisor for InformationTechnology, Immediate Office of the Director,Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality540 Gaither Road, Suite 3026Rockville, MD 20850(301) 417-1227FAX: (301) 427-1210
DARPAGary M. Koob, Ph.D.Program Manager, Information ProcessingTechnology Office, Defense Advanced ResearchProjects Agency3701 North Fairfax DriveArlington, VA 22203-1714(703) 696-7463FAX: (703) 696-4534
DOE/SCDaniel A. Hitchcock, Ph.D.Senior Technical Advisor for Advanced ScientificComputing Research, Office of AdvancedScientific Computing Research (OASCR),Department of Energy/Office of ScienceOASCR, SC-30Germantown Building1000 Independence Ave., S.W.Washington, D.C. 20585-1290(301) 903-6767FAX: (301) 903-4846
Charles Romine, Ph.D.Program Manager, Mathematical, Information,and Computational Sciences, (MICS) Division,Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research(OASCR), Department of Energy/Office of ScienceOASCR/MICS, SC-31Germantown Building1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.Washington, D.C. 20585-1290(301) 903-5152FAX: (301) 903-7774
EPASteven Fine, Ph.D.Networking and Information Technology R&DProgram Manager, Environmental ProtectionAgency MD 243-01Research Triangle Park, NC 27711(919) 541-0757FAX: (919) 541-1379
FAAErnest R. LucierAdvisor on High Confidence Systems, FederalAviation AdministrationFAA/AIO-4, 800 Independence Ave., S.W.Washington, D.C. 20591(202) 366-0633FAX: (202) 366-3064
APPENDIX 4: NITRD GRAND CHALLENGES TASK FORCECONTACT INFORMATION
NOTE: The contact information provided in this appendix was current as of the document’s initial publication in November 2003 and may have changed.
Marshall Potter, Ph.D.Chief Scientist for IT, Federal AviationAdministrationFAA/AIO-4, 800 Independence Ave., S.W.Washington, D.C. 20591(202) 267-9878FAX: (202) 267-5080
NCO/IT R&DEdward L. GarciaContract Program Manager, NationalCoordination Office for Information TechnologyResearch and DevelopmentSuite II-405, 4201 Wilson BoulevardArlington, VA 22230(703) 292-4873FAX: (202) 292-9097
Helen Gigley, Ph.D.HCI&IM, HCSS, and SDP Liaison, NationalCoordination Office for Information TechnologyResearch and DevelopmentSuite II-405, 4201 Wilson BoulevardArlington, VA 22230(703) 292-4504FAX: (202) 292-9097
Sally E. Howe, Ph.D.Associate Director, National Coordination Officefor Information Technology Research andDevelopmentSuite II-405, 4201 Wilson BoulevardArlington, VA 22230(703) 292-7923FAX: (202) 292-9097
Frankie D. KingSpecial Projects Liaison, National CoordinationOffice for Information Technology Research andDevelopmentSuite II-405, 4201 Wilson BoulevardArlington, VA 22230(703) 292-7920FAX: (202) 292-9097
Martha MatzkeSenior Technical Writer, National CoordinationOffice for Information Technology Research andDevelopmentSuite II-405, 4201 Wilson BoulevardArlington, VA 22230(703) 292-7926FAX: (202) 292-9097
50
51
Grant Miller, Ph.D.LSN Liaison, National Coordination Office forInformation Technology Research andDevelopmentSuite II-405, 4201 Wilson BoulevardArlington, VA 22230(703) 292-7928FAX: (202) 292-9097
David B. Nelson, Ph.D.Director, National Coordination Office forInformation Technology Research andDevelopmentSuite II-405, 4201 Wilson BoulevardArlington, VA 22230(703) 292-4873FAX: (202) 292-9097
NIHMichael Marron, Ph.D.Director, Biomedical Technology, National Centerfor Research Resources, National Institutes ofHealthOne Rockledge Center6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 6160Bethesda, MD 20892-7965(301) 435-0753FAX: (301) 480-3659
NIST Judith Devaney, Ph.D.Group Leader, Scientific Applications andVisualization Group, Mathematical andComputational Sciences Division, InformationTechnology Laboratory, National Institute ofStandards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8911Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8911(301) 975-2882FAX: (301) 975-3218
Larry Reeker, Ph.D.Senior Computer Scientist, InformationTechnology Laboratory, National Institute ofStandards and Technology100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8911Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8911(301) 975-5147FAX: (301) 946-1784
Jean Scholtz, Ph.D.Information Access Division, InformationTechnology Laboratory, National Institute ofStandards and Technology100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8911Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8911(301) 975-2520FAX: (301) 975-5287
NOTE: The contact information provided in this appendix was current as of the document’s initial publication in November 2003 and may have changed.
NOAAWilliam T. TurnbullDeputy Chief Information Officer and Director,HPCC Office, National Oceanic and AtmosphericAdministrationRoom 96361325 East-West HighwaySilver Spring, MD 20910(301) 713-9600 x133FAX: (301) 713-4040
NSAGeorge CotterOffice of Corporate Assessments, National Security Agency9800 Savage Road, Suite 6217Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6217(301) 688-6434FAX: (301) 688-4980
Barbara Wheatley, Ph.D.Office of Corporate Assessments, National Security Agency9800 Savage Road, Suite 6217Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6217(301) 688-8448FAX: (301) 688-4980
NSFFrank Anger, Ph.D.Deputy Division Director and Program Director,Software Engineering and Languages, Computer-Communications Research Division, Directoratefor Computer and Information Science andEngineering, National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1145Arlington, VA 22230(703) 292-8911FAX: (703) 292-9059
William S. Bainbridge, Ph.D.Deputy Division Director and Program Director,Information and Intelligent Systems Division,Directorate for Computer and Information Scienceand Engineering, National Science Foundation4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1115Arlington, VA 22230(703) 292-8930FAX: (703) 292-9073
Helen Gill, Ph.D.Program Director, Computer-CommunicationsResearch Division, Directorate for Computer andInformation Science and Engineering, NationalScience Foundation4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1145Arlington, VA 22230(703) 292-8910FAX: (703) 292-9059
52
53
C. Suzanne Iacono, Ph.D.Program Director, Information TechnologyResearch (ITR), Directorate for Computer andInformation Science and Engineering, NationalScience Foundation4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1145Arlington, VA 22230(703) 292-8930FAX: (703) 292-9073
Stephen R. MahaneySenior Advisor for Budget, Management, andPlanning, Directorate for Computer andInformation Science and Engineering, NationalScience Foundation4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1145Arlington, VA 22230(703) 292-8900FAX: (703) 292-9074
Michael Pazzani, Ph.D.Division Director, Information and IntelligentSystems Division, Directorate for Computer andInformation Science and Engineering4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1145Arlington, VA 22230(703) 292-8930FAX: (703) 292-9073
George O. Strawn, Ph.D. (GrandChallenges Task Force Chair)Chief Information Officer, National ScienceFoundation4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1145Arlington, VA 22230(703) 292-8102FAX: (703) 292-9084
ODDR&ESteven E. King, Ph.D.Special Advisor for Critical InfrastructureProtection, Information Systems Directorate,Office of the Deputy Undersecretary of Defense(Science and Technology), Department of Defense1777 North Kent Street, Suite 9030Rosslyn, VA 22209(703) 588-7414FA: (703) 588-7560
OSTPSimon Szykman, Ph.D.National Science and Technology CouncilEisenhower Executive Office Building1650 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20502-0001(202) 456-6054FAX: (202) 456-6021
NOTE: The contact information provided in this appendix was current as of the document’s initial publication in November 2003 and may have changed.
AHRQ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
BIRN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Biomedical Informatics Research Network
CAFE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate Average Fuel Economy
DARPA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
DoD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Department of Defense
DOE/SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Department of Energy/Office of Science
EPA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Environmental Protection Agency
FAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Federal Aviation Administration
FACMI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fellow of the American College of Medical Informatics
Gigabits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . billions of bits
HCI&IM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Human-Computer Interaction and Information Management
HEC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . High End Computing
HPCC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . High Performance Computing andCommunications
HVAC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
IT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Information Technology
ITR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Information Technology Research
IWG/IT R&D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interagency Working Group onInformation Technology Research and Development
LSN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Large Scale Networking
Moore’s Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . computing performance roughly doubles every 18 months while chip size, power, etc., remain constant
MTTR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . mean time to recovery
NCO/IT R&D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . National Coordination Office forInformation Technology Research and Development
NEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation
APPENDIX 5: ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY
54
NIH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . National Institutes of Health
NIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . National Institute of Standards and Technology
NITRD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Networking and Information TechnologyResearch and Development
NOAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . National Oceanic and AtmosphericAdministration
NOx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ozone
NSA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . National Security Agency
NSF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . National Science Foundation
NSTC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . National Science and Technology Council
NVO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . National Virtual Observatory
ODDR&E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DoD’s Office of the Director, DefenseResearch and Engineering
OSTP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
PARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . people, agents, robots, and sensors
R&D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and Development
SCADA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Software Design and Productivity
SPARC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Space Physics and Aeronomy ResearchCollaboratory
Teraops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . trillions of operations per second
UARC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Upper Atmospheric Research Collaboratory
UAV. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unmanned Air Vehicle
55
56
GRAND CHALLENGES TASK FORCE CHAIRGeorge O. Strawn, NSF
EXECUTIVE EDITORSally E. Howe, NCO/IT R&D
EDITORFrankie D. King, NCO/IT R&D
A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T SThis booklet is designed to share with the broader
scientific community and the general public insightsinto the formulation of the Networking and Infor-mation Technology Research and Development’s(NITRD) grand challenges. Many people over manymonths contributed to the broader grand challengesactivity that made possible this booklet’s printing.
First, the Task Force Chair and Editors extend aspecial thanks to the members of the 2003 GrandChallenges Task Force who dedicated countless hoursabove and beyond their normal workload. Their tirelesscontributions are reflective of their commitment, notonly to this booklet, but also to the advancement ofscience and technology.
Thanks also goes to Nicole Ausherman of Noesis Inc.for creating the booklet’s design, structuring its layout,and overseeing the administration of its printing.
Finally, the Editors thank their NCO colleagues,particularly Helen Gigley, LaShante Jenkins, MarthaMatzke, and Grant Miller, for their contributions tocritiquing, editing, and proofreading the booklet.
C O P Y R I G H TThis is a work of the U.S. Government and is in the
public domain. It may be freely distributed and copied,but it is requested that the National Coordination Officefor Networking and Information Technology Researchand Development (NCO/NITRD) be acknowledged.