Date post: | 04-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | zoe-armstrong |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
PRIMES[6] Life Cycle Costs (LCC) in GPP
Presented by
(Insert own logo)
Overview
LCC - the real price of products
How to use LCC in public procurement
When to use LCC in public procurement
LCC methodology/tools
Good practice examples
Source: © Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
OverviewHow much does a product cost?
Standard product Green product
Cost
PricePrice
Use Use
DisposalDisposal
Cheapest price
Economically most
advantageous offer
Changing mindset
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
Covers the entire lifecycle of a product or provision of a service, from raw material to disposal/recycling
Before use – Development, production and procurement
During use – operation with operating costs, service and usage of resources
After use – recovery with disposal, recycling or sales revenue
Source: Baltic GPP Green Public Procurement PPT– www.balticgpp.eu
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
Source: SMART SPP project – www.smart-spp.eu
BENEFITS
Greater awareness of total costs
Greater transparency of future costs
Better prediction and planning
Helps on evaluation of bids in a more sustainable manner
More efficient use of public resources
Greater awareness and communication of savings
Use of LCC in public procurement
Source: © SMART SPP Project - www.smart-spp.eu
LCC, LCA and TCOTerminology
Life Cycle Costing (LCC): technique considering costs and benefits taking place during a specific phase of the lifecycle of a product
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): considers the environmental impact of a product from cradle to grave.
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): includes only direct costs for the owner of the product (purchasing price + cost of use + disposal)
The real costsInternal & External costs
External costsSocial costs:
environmental damage, climate change,
biodiversity loss, health issues
Internal costsTCO (price, usage,
maintenance, disposal)
Advanced LCC
Conventional LCC
= LCC which monetises environmental
externalities [Whole-life costing” (WLC)]
= costs for society of specific environmental
impacts, such as climate change or
acidification.
External LCC costs
Use of LCC in top ten EU MS
Source: 2012, CEPS, The uptake of green public procurement in the EU 27
Overview
LCC - the real price of products
How to use LCC in public procurement
When to use LCC in public procurement
LCC methodology/tools
Good practice examples
Source: © Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
EU Procurement DirectiveRequirements (Directive 2004/24, art. 68) I
Costs related to environmental externalities
can only be taken into account if their monetary
value can be determined and verified.
In order to ensure that LCC is transparent and
embodies equal treatment, the methodology
(LCC tool used) must be indicated in
advance in the tender documents and
accessible to all interested parties.
EU Procurement DirectiveRequirements (Directive 2004/24, art. 68) II
The methodology must be based on
objectively verifiable and non-
discriminatory criteria and the data
required can be provided with reasonable
effort by 'normally diligent' operators,
including those from outside of the EU. Whenever a common method for the calculation of
life- cycle costs has been made mandatory by a
legislative act of the Union, that common method shall
be applied for the assessment of life-cycle costs (e.g.
Clean Vehicles Directive).
The Clean Vehicle DirectiveExternal LCC costs
Contracting authorities must take energy and
environmental impacts into account when purchasing
road transport vehicles (either in specifications or award
criteria)
Provides methodology for the monetisation of these
impacts
Model allocates a monetary value to several types of
emission – carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (NOx), non-
methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) and particulate matter
Cost of lifetime emissions of each vehicle tendered to be
added to other direct costs such as purchase price, fuel costs
and maintenance.
LCC considerations (I)Savings on use of energy and water
Need of energy and water => strong impact on LCC
costs
Need of energy and water => strong environmental
impactGreek city saves on lighting costs
The City of Amaroussion in Greece examined the potential savings from
replacement of its street lighting equipment before going to tender. It found
that replacement of its old high-pressure mercury lamps with metal halide
lamps would lead to savings of approximately 40% per annum in terms of
electricity consumption.
Source: Buying Green! A handbook on green public procurement 2nd edition, European Commission 2011
Savings on maintenance and replacement
maximise the period until replacement
minimise the amount of maintenance work which needs
to be done.
Innovative example!
The use of ground granulated blast furnace slag in concrete may increase
the lifespan of buildings, and at the same time reduce the amount of
efflorescence (saltpetering) requiring maintenance.
This could reduce the total life-cycle cost when compared with other types
of concrete. consumption.
Source: Buying Green! A handbook on green public procurement 2nd edition, European Commission 2011
LCC considerations(II)
Savings on disposal costs
Often underestimated!
Can turn a bargain into an expensive purchase.
Range from cost of physical removal to paying for secure
disposal.Intelligent planning in building sector
In your call for tenders you could ask builders how much hazardous waste
they expect to produce during demolition and the cost of removing it. In
some cases, e.g. road building, it should also be possible to calculate the
profits to be made from using recycled waste materials, such as used
asphalt or demolished building materials.
Source: Buying Green! A handbook on green public procurement 2nd edition, European Commission 2011
LCC considerations(III)
Discount rate and data availability
Discount rate
Costs in the future are not worth as much as those
incurred today
Net present value: e.g. 1000€ invested today at 3%
interest would be worth 1030€ in 1 years‘s time.
Therefore, 1030€ spent in 1 year‘s time is only worth
1000€ at present time.
Data availability and reliability
Unpredictability of costs to be incurred in the future needs
independent, reliable cost estimates (e.g. future trend of
fuel prices)
LCC considerations(IV)
Data needed for calculations
A breakdown of the various costs of the product or service
An estimate of all costs
The discount rate and the inflation rate for the different
cost elements
The time frame in order to calculate the present net value
of the the product or service
LCC considerations(V)
Overview
LCC - the real price of products
How to use LCC in public procurement
When to use LCC in public procurement
LCC methodology/tools
Good practice examples
Source: © Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
EX ANTE (pre-tendering phase)
Before the tendering procedure to:
help defining needs
decide on the best available environmental and economic
option to tender (planning)
Example:
Provide public transport tickets for administration instead of
purchasing new cars
Use of LCC in public procurement
DURING the tendering procedure
During the tendering procedure to:
compare the economic offers of products and services
Example:Assign a higher amount of awarding points to offers/bids with lower LCC
Use of LCC in public procurement
Source: © Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
EX POST
After the tendering procedure to:
assess choice green vs. standard product
inform on the benefits obtained
gather information and enable better future planning
Use of LCC in public procurement
Source: © Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Overview
LCC - the real price of products
How to use LCC in public procurement
When to use LCC in public procurement
LCC methodology/tools
Good practice examples
Source: © Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Microsoft Excel® Tool (html-version: www.lcc-tool.eu)
Supports procurers in calculating life-cycle costs and CO2
emissions of innovative products and services
Graphical display of results and tender evaluation (up to
15 offers)
The Smart SPP LCC/CO2tool
Source: © SMART SPP Project - www.smart-spp.eu
Tool produced within EU-Project „Buy Smart+ Green
Procurement in Europe“ (IEE EC Funding programme)
General calculation tool to be used for electricity using
products
Website:
http://www.buy-smart.info/downloads2/downloads3
The BUY SMART+ tool
Source: Buy Smart+ at www.buy-smart.info
SEMCO has developed several excel tools for calculating
LCC in public procurement.
In addition to a general tool, specialised ones are available
for professional kitchens (fridges and freezers), indoor and
outdoor lighting and vending and coffee machines, light
vehicles
Website: http://www.msr.se/en
The Swedish Environmental Management Council (SEMCO)
Energy Calculator for PC Equipment
Website: http://www.eu-energystar.org/en/en_008.shtml
The ENERGY STAR ® tool
Overview
LCC - the real price of products
How to use LCC in public procurement
When to use LCC in public procurement
LCC methodology/tools
Good practice examples
Source: © Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Kolding, DenmarkInterior and external lighting
Source: © Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Founding member of :
Kolding, DenmarkGood practice example
Introduction:
Procurement of innovative, energy efficient
LED replacement light bulbs, for indoor and
outdoor use
aims to encourage sustainable product innovation for
energy efficient lighting technologies
Tender was devided in three sub-groups: low voltage
lights bulb, 230 volt halogen light bulbs and pins, 230
volt light bulbs
Source: © Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Kolding, Denmark
Technical specifications:
Indoor lighting CRI (Colour Rendering Index)>80 Colour temperature (Kelvin) 2700-3000 General lighting-efficiency (lumen/watt)> 50 Effect lighting -efficiency (lumen/watt)> 40 Life-span (hours at L70)> 20000
Outdoor lighting CRI (Colour Rendering Index)>75 Colour temperature (Kelvin) 3000-4000 General lighting-efficiency (lumen/watt)> 50 Life-span (hours at L70)> 20000
Source: © Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Kolding, Denmark
Award criteria:
Life-cycle costs have been given a weighting of
55%. These are broken down by: purchase price
(35%), lifetime (35%) and operating costs (30%)
Energy-efficiency (lumen/watt) (25%)
Light quality (CRI) (20%)
Results:
The deadline for responding to the call for tender is set
for the end of February. The results of the tender will be
available on the SMART SPP website when the process
is completed. Source: © Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Berlin, GermanyVehicles
© http://it.gdefon.com/download/vista_Strada_viale_Berlino_parco/411414/3000x1988
Berlin, GermanyGood practice example
Introduction:
procures a variety of vehicles every year
(approximately 200)
considering life cycle costs in the procurement process
of vehicles to include energy and environmental costs.
sustainability criteria included based on those required
by the Clean Vehicles Directive and were developed in
further detail to meet the needs of the police force and
adjusted to the current status quo of vehicle technology
Berlin, Germany
Technical specifications:
Meeting German 4 standard for particle emissions – this
allows the vehicle to be driven in German inner-city
environmental zones (‘Umweltzone’)
Carbon particulate filter (for diesel engines)
Meeting the Euro 5 European Emission Standard (the
most demanding standard at the time of tendering)
Berlin, Germany
Award criteria I:
The tender was awarded using a two-step process: 1) Assessment of technical aspects (40% of total points) and LCC
(60% of total points), which includes financial and environmental costs. A maximum of 40,000 points could be awarded.
2) The highest scoring bid from step 1, along with the bids which scored up to 10% less points, were then compared purely on the basis of their purchase price, awarding the tender then to the lowest bid.
Berlin, Germany
Award criteria II:
LCC including environmental costs: Maintenance costs were calculated based on calculations made using
co-efficients for future specific maintenance and repair work of the vehicles (e.g. tyres, window replacement). The environmental costs were calculated based on a) fuel consumption, b) energy consumption, c) CO2 emissions, d) NOx, e) non-methane hydrocarbons and f) particulate matter.
The lifetime cost calculation from the Clean Vehicles Directive was largely used as a basis for calculating the environmental costs.
Berlin, Germany
Results: There were no problems encountered with bidders being unable to
conform or meet the tender requirements. Also, the total number of bids received did not differ to the number
received from previous tenders. Due to the strict focus and the consideration of the various costs
during the products lifetime, the tender was awarded to the bidder who successfully complied with the predetermined environmental criteria and also satisfied the financial requirements imposed, thus also obtaining a positive economic result for the tendering authority.
Source: © Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net