NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Page 1 of 62
Fapas® – Food Chemistry Proficiency Test Report 19248
Pesticide Residues in Lemon Purée
April-June 2018
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 2 of 62
PARTICIPANT LABORATORY NUMBER
Participants can log in to Fapas® SecureWeb at any time to obtain their laboratory number for this proficiency test. Laboratory numbers are displayed in SecureWeb next to the download link for this report.
REPORT INTEGRITY
Fapas® reports are distributed as digitally signed Adobe® PDF files. When these files are opened with Adobe® Reader v9 or later, a blue ribbon and information bar indicates that the certificate has been validated. This confirms that the author of the report is Fapas® and that the document has not been altered since it was signed [1, 2]. The integrity of hard copies of Fapas® reports cannot be assured in this way, i.e. printed copies are not controlled. A watermark stating this appears on every page when a Fapas® report is printed. End users of Fapas® reports should ensure that either the PDF file they are viewing displays a valid Fapas® digital signature or that the content of their hard copy exactly matches the content of a PDF file that displays a valid Fapas® digital signature.
QUALITY SYSTEMS
Fapas® – Food Chemistry is accredited by UKAS as complying with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17043:2010 [3]. Fera is an ISO 9001 certified organisation.
0009
Fera hereby excludes all liability for any claim, loss, demands or damages of any kind whatsoever (whether such claims, loss, demands or damages were foreseeable, known or otherwise) arising out of or in connection with the preparation of any technical or scientific report, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage; loss of actual or anticipated profits (including loss of profits on contracts); loss of revenue; loss of business; loss of opportunity; loss of anticipated savings; loss of goodwill; loss of reputation; loss or damage to or corruption of data; loss of use of money or otherwise, and whether or not advised of the possibility of such claim, loss demand or damages and whether arising in tort (including negligence), contract or otherwise. This statement does not affect your statutory rights. Nothing in this disclaimer excludes or limits Fera liability for: (a) death or personal injury caused by Fera negligence (or that of its employees, agents or directors); or (b) the tort of deceit; [or (c) any breach of the obligations implied by Sale of Goods Act 1979 or Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 (including those relating to the title, fitness for purpose and satisfactory quality of goods);] or (d) any liability which may not be limited or excluded by law (e) fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation. The parties agree that any matters are governed by English law and irrevocably submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts. © Copyright Fera Science Ltd (Fera) 2018. All rights reserved.
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 3 of 62
SUMMARY
1. The test materials for Fapas® – Food Chemistry proficiency test 19248 were dispatched in April 2018. Each participant received a lemon purée test material to be analysed for a selection of pesticide residues.
2. An assigned value (xa) was determined for each analyte and in conjunction with the
standard deviation for proficiency (σp) was used to calculate a z-score for each result.
3. Results for this proficiency test are summarised as follows:
analyte assigned value, xₐ µg/kg
number of scores, |z| ≤2
total number of scores
% |z|≤2
Acetochlor 88.3 39 45 87
Chlordane (cis) 34.4 37 50 74
Dimethoate 182 61 69 88
Endosulfan I (alpha) 125 58 64 91
EPN 48.6 46 52 88
Etofenprox 105 59 63 94
Fenamidone 62.4 52 59 88
Fluvalinate (tau) 75.5 46 56 82
Linuron 125 58 66 88
Pyriproxyfen 106 59 67 88
Tebuconazole 129 58 67 87
Triazophos 41.1 59 66 89
Triflumuron 103 46 54 85
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 4 of 62
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 6
1.1. Proficiency Testing 6
2. TEST MATERIAL 6
2.1. Preparation 6
2.2. Homogeneity 6
2.3. Dispatch 6
3. RESULTS 6
4. STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF RESULTS 7
4.1. Calculation of the Assigned Value, xa 7
4.2. Standard Deviation for Proficiency, σp 8
4.3. Individual z-Scores 8
5. INTERPRETATION OF SCORES 8
6. REFERENCES 9
TABLES Table 1: Results and z-Scores for Acetochlor, Chlordane (cis) and Dimethoate 10
Table 2: Results and z-Scores for Endosulfan l (alpha), EPN and Etofenprox 15
Table 3: Results and z-Scores for Fenamidone, Fluvalinate (tau) and Linuron 20
Table 4: Results and z-Scores for Pyriproxyfen and Tebuconazole 25
Table 5: Results and z-Scores for Triazophos and Triflumuron 30
Table 6: Additional Pesticide Residues Reported 35 Table 7: Participants’ Comments 35
Table 8: Assigned Values and Standard Deviations for Proficiency 36
Table 9: Number and Percentage of z-Scores where |z| ≤2 36
FIGURES Figure 1: z-Scores for Acetochlor 37
Figure 2: z-Scores for Chlordane (cis) 38
Figure 3: z-Scores for Dimethoate 39
Figure 4: z-Scores for Endosulfan I (alpha) 40
Figure 5: z-Scores for EPN 41
Figure 6: z-Scores for Etofenprox 42
Figure 7: z-Scores for Fenamidone 43
Figure 8: z-Scores for Fluvalinate (tau) 44
Figure 9: z-Scores for Linuron 45
Figure 10: z-Scores for Pyriproxyfen 46
Figure 11: z-Scores for Tebuconazole 47
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 5 of 62
Figure 12: z-Scores for Triazophos 48
Figure 13: z-Scores for Triflumuron 49
APPENDICES APPENDIX I: Analytical Methods Used by Participants 50
APPENDIX II: Fapas® SecureWeb, Protocol and Contact Details 62
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 6 of 62
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Proficiency Testing
Proficiency testing aims to provide an independent assessment of the competence of participating laboratories. Together with the use of validated methods, proficiency testing is an essential element of laboratory quality assurance. Further details of the Fapas® – Food Chemistry proficiency testing scheme are available in our protocols [4, 5].
2. TEST MATERIAL
2.1. Preparation
Preparation of the samples for this proficiency test was sub-contracted to a laboratory meeting the quality requirements of the scheme’s accreditation [3]. The test material was prepared from fresh lemons. The bulk sample was split into two batches: one for spiking and one for the blank test material. Sub-samples were taken to screen for the possible presence of incurred residues and the remainder was stored at -20°C. No residues were detected at, or above, 15 μg/kg. Acetochlor, Chlordane (cis), Dimethoate, Endosulfan I (alpha), EPN, Etofenprox, Fenamidone, Fluvalinate (tau), Linuron, Pyriproxyfen, Tebuconazole, Triazophos and Triflumuron were spiked into the test material. Samples were stored at -20°C until dispatch.
2.2. Homogeneity
To test for homogeneity, randomly selected test materials were analysed in duplicate. Testing was sub-contracted to a laboratory meeting the quality requirements of the scheme’s accreditation [3]. These data showed sufficient homogeneity and were not included in the subsequent calculation of the assigned values.
2.3. Dispatch
The start date was 16 April 2018. Test materials were sent to 80 participants.
3. RESULTS
The instructions for reporting results were as follows: • Determine the level of pesticide residues present in the test material, in µg/kg, as
received, uncorrected for recovery, together with the percentage recovery and limit of quantification (LoQ).
• All pesticide residues are to be reported as the parent compound only, unless specified otherwise.
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 7 of 62
• If any residues are reported not in the form specified, please note this in the comments box.
• For residues tested for but not detected, please enter an LoQ via the ‘review/resubmit your results’ link on your list of tests. This has to be done after you have submitted results for all pesticide residues detected.
• This is an identification and quantification test, therefore if you analyse for a pesticide that is in the test material, and do not identify it, and your limit of quantification is below the level needed for a satisfactory z-score or you do not submit an LoQ, you will be assessed as if your result was zero.
Results were submitted by 74 participants (93%) before the closing date for this test, 1 June 2018. Each participant was given a laboratory number, assigned in order of receipt of results. The reported analyte concentrations are given in Table 1-Table 5. If a participant analysed for a pesticide residue that was in the test material, but did not identify it, and their limit of quantification was below the level needed for a z-score of -3.0, they were assessed as if their result was zero. If a participant analysed for a pesticide residue that was in the test material, but did not identify it, and their limit of quantification was above the level needed for a z-score of -3.0, the result was recorded as <LoQ. Any participant identifying pesticide residues other than Acetochlor, Chlordane (cis), Dimethoate, Endosulfan I (alpha), EPN, Etofenprox, Fenamidone, Fluvalinate (tau), Linuron, Pyriproxyfen, Tebuconazole, Triazophos and Triflumuron at a level ≥15 µg/kg are listed in Table 6 together with the percentage recovery and LoQ. Participants’ comments are given in Table 7. The analytical methods used by each participant are summarised in APPENDIX I.
4. STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF RESULTS
The results submitted by participants were statistically analysed in order to provide an assigned value for each analyte. The assigned values were then used in combination with the standard deviation for proficiency, σp, to calculate a z-score [6] for each result. The procedure is detailed in the relevant protocols [4, 5]. Further background on the procedure followed can be found in the IUPAC International Harmonised Protocol for the Proficiency Testing of Analytical Chemistry Laboratories [7].
4.1. Calculation of the Assigned Value, xa
The assigned value, xa, for each analyte was derived from the consensus of the results submitted by participants. The following results were excluded from the calculation of the assigned value:
i) non numerical results i.e. qualitative or semi-quantitative results, ii) results reported as approximately 10, 100 or 1000 × greater or smaller than the
majority of submitted results (as these were considered to be reporting errors), iii) results where no percentage recovery was reported, iv) results whose recovery was outside the range 60-140% [8],
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 8 of 62
v) results where no limit of quantification was reported. For all analytes, this procedure was straightforward and the robust mean was chosen as the assigned value. The assigned values for all analytes are shown in Table 8.
4.2. Standard Deviation for Proficiency, σp
The standard deviation for proficiency, σp, was set at a value that reflects best practice for the analyses in question. For all analytes, σp was derived from the appropriate form of the Horwitz equation [9]. The values for σp used to calculate z-scores from the reported results of this test are given in Table 8.
4.3. Individual z-Scores
Participants’ z-scores were calculated as:
p
axxzσ
)( −=
where x = the participant’s reported result,
xa = the assigned value and σp = the standard deviation for proficiency.
Participants’ z-scores for all analytes are given in Table 1-Table 5 and shown as histograms in Figures 1–13. It is possible for the z-scores published in this report to differ slightly from the z-score that can be calculated using the formula given above. These differences arise from the necessary rounding of the actual assigned values and standard deviations for proficiency prior to their publication in Table 8. The number and percentage of z-scores in the range -2 ≤ z ≤ 2 for all analytes are given in Table 9.
5. INTERPRETATION OF SCORES
In normal circumstances, over time, about 95% of z-scores will lie in the range -2 ≤ z ≤ 2. Occasional scores in the range 2 <|z| <3 are to be expected, at a rate of 1 in 20. Whether or not such scores are of importance can only be decided by considering them in the context of the other scores obtained by that laboratory. Scores where |z| >3 are to be expected at a rate of about 1 in 300. Given this rarity, such z-scores very strongly indicate that the result is not fit-for-purpose and almost certainly requires investigation. The consideration of a set or sequence of z-scores over time provides more useful information than a single z-score. Examples of suitable methods of comparison are provided in the IUPAC International Harmonised Protocol for the Proficiency Testing of Analytical Chemistry Laboratories [7].
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 9 of 62
6. REFERENCES
1 Adobe Approved Trust List, https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/kb/approved-trust-list2.html#Whatisit accessed 01/06/2017.
2 GlobalSign PDF Signing Tool, https://www.globalsign.com/en/pdf-signing/ accessed 01/06/2017.
3 ISO/IEC 17043:2010, Conformity assessment – General requirements for proficiency testing.
4 Fapas®, 2017, Protocol for Proficiency Testing Schemes, Version 6, April 2017, Part 1 – Common Principles.
5 Fapas®, 2017, Protocol for Proficiency Testing Schemes, Version 5, April 2017, Part 2 – Fapas® Food Chemistry scheme (FAPAS).
6 AMC Tech Brief No. 74, z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testing – their meanings, and some common misconceptions, Anal. Methods, 2016, 8, 5553.
7 Thompson, M., Ellison, S.L.R. and Wood, R., 2006, The International Harmonised Protocol for the Proficiency Testing of Analytical Chemistry Laboratories, Pure Appl. Chem., 78, No. 1, 145–196.
8 Guidance Document on Analytical Quality Control and Method Validation Procedures for Pesticide Residues Analysis in Food and Feed, Document No. SANTE/11945/2015.
9 Thompson, M., 2000, Recent trends in inter-laboratory precision at ppb and sub-ppb concentrations in relation to fitness for purpose criteria in proficiency testing, Analyst, 125, 385-386.
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 10 of 62
Table 1: Results and z-Scores for Acetochlor, Chlordane (cis) and Dimethoate
laboratory number
analyte
Acetochlor Chlordane (cis) Dimethoate
assigned value: 88.3 µg/kg assigned value: 34.4 µg/kg assigned value: 182 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
001
91 92 10 0.1 35 91 10 0.1 185 94 10 0.1
002
95 90 10 0.3 40 94 10 0.7 175 81 10 -0.2
003
#
#
81.76 98.16 10 -2.7 004
93.6 112.2 5 0.3 113.5 77.8 10 10.4 153.0 115.4 5 -0.8
005
67.7 88 10 -1.1 26.4 107 10 -1.1 198.4 80 10 0.4
006
94 106 10 0.3 42 100 10 1.0 193 100 10 0.3
007
#
31.2 101.3 0.01 -0.4 152.2 83.1 0.01 -0.8
008
119 118 10 1.6 34 89 10 -0.1 199 102 10 0.5
009
93.2
10 0.3 33.9
10 -0.1 189
10 0.2
010
#
#
153 89 5 -0.8
011
76 100 10 -0.6 31 100 10 -0.5 188 100 10 0.2
012
#
#
171.7 96 10 -0.3
013
92 98 10 0.2 38 86 10 0.5 183 100 10 0.0
014
#
#
233 90.6 0.010 mg/kg
1.4
015
#
#
#
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 11 of 62
Table 1 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Acetochlor, Chlordane (cis) and Dimethoate
laboratory number
analyte
Acetochlor Chlordane (cis) Dimethoate
assigned value: 88.3 µg/kg assigned value: 34.4 µg/kg assigned value: 182 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
016
93.0 105 10 0.2 35.0 98 10 0.1 177.4 97 10 -0.1
017
78.4 118 10.0 -0.5 25.6 121 10.0 -1.2 > 200 124 10.0
018
#
#
136
10 -1.2
019
74.55
-0.7 29.29
-0.7 178.81
-0.1
020
115 63 0.01 1.4 42
0.01 1.0 352 52 0.01 4.5 021
#
#
184 26 10 0.1
022
#
#
#
023
#
#
398 95 10 5.8 024
95.2 78
0.4 30.3 80
-0.5 304.8 119
3.3
025
96.05 101.55 10 0.4 36.74 104.70 10 0.3 220.43 97.10 10 1.0
026
#
0
-4.5 179 104 10 -0.1
027
#
#
240.01 98.4 10 1.6
028
54 100 10 -1.8 31 100 10 -0.5 200 100 10 0.5
029
74.3 90 10 -0.7 28.9 82 10 -0.7 217.9 98 10 1.0
030
78 85 10 -0.5 0
-4.5 230 90 10 1.3
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 12 of 62
Table 1 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Acetochlor, Chlordane (cis) and Dimethoate
laboratory number
analyte
Acetochlor Chlordane (cis) Dimethoate
assigned value: 88.3 µg/kg assigned value: 34.4 µg/kg assigned value: 182 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
031
90.4 104.8 10 0.1 35.1 102.2 34 0.1 127.8 84.6 34 -1.4
032
124 80.6 10 1.8 597 92.3 10 74.2 152 106.4 10 -0.8
033
0.076 106 0.005 -4.5 #
0.23 108 0.005 -4.8 034
#
#
198
10 0.4
035
94 108 5 0.3 35 103 5 0.1 186 90 5 0.1
036
73 100 10 -0.8 30 80 10 -0.6 155 90 10 -0.7
037
140 112.8 10 2.7 90 100 10 7.3 200 74.9 10 0.5
038
#
#
211 97 6 0.8
039
65.7 86 5 -1.2 27.8 91 5 -0.9 169 82 5 -0.3
040
#
#
195
0.4
041
63 99 5 -1.3 24 94 5 -1.4 162 81 5 -0.5
042
#
34.3 104.4 0.01 mg/kg 0.0 200 82.6 0.01 mg/kg 0.5
043
0
-4.5 0
-4.5 181 102 5 0.0
044
99.9 78.5 10 0.6 40.9 65 10 0.9 169.5 83.2 10 -0.3
045
84 101 10 -0.2 30 95 10 -0.6 153 117 10 -0.8
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 13 of 62
Table 1 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Acetochlor, Chlordane (cis) and Dimethoate
laboratory number
analyte
Acetochlor Chlordane (cis) Dimethoate
assigned value: 88.3 µg/kg assigned value: 34.4 µg/kg assigned value: 182 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
046
#
#
152 78.8 10 -0.8
047
85 100 10 -0.2 37 100 10 0.3 211 100 10 0.8
048
#
23 89 10 -1.5 157 89 10 -0.7
049
#
18 85 10 -2.2 167 90 10 -0.4
050
84 92 10 -0.2 #
179 112 10 -0.1
051
#
#
305.05 171.47 10 3.3 052
#
#
166 87 20 -0.4
053
82 89 10 -0.3 35 94 10 0.1 219 106 10 1.0
054
#
#
210
0.8
055
#
0
5 -4.5 210 89.1 5 0.8
056
91.0 97.9 10 0.1 35.1 92.0 10 0.1 189.2 101.1 10 0.2
057
77
10 -0.6 40
10 0.7 172
10 -0.3
058
#
#
184.3 100 5 0.1
059
101 88 10 0.7 22 101 10 -1.6 250 97 10 1.8
060
#
90 139 10 7.3 212 105 10 0.8
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 14 of 62
Table 1 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Acetochlor, Chlordane (cis) and Dimethoate
laboratory number
analyte
Acetochlor Chlordane (cis) Dimethoate
assigned value: 88.3 µg/kg assigned value: 34.4 µg/kg assigned value: 182 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
061
#
#
125.9
3 -1.5
062
100 95 10 0.6 36 95 10 0.2 216 95 10 0.9
063
80 110 10 -0.4 #
190 90 10 0.2
064
65 103 10 -1.2 0
-4.5 116 101 10 -1.7
065
100 125 10 0.6 34 95 10 -0.1 157 103 10 -0.7
066
#
#
#
067
87 91 10 -0.1 34 101 10 -0.1 275 96 10 2.5 068
#
31 90 5 -0.5 185 77 10 0.1
069
0
-4.5 115.59 92 10 10.7 136.41 87 10 -1.2
070
0
-4.5 135 86 10 13.3 143 112 10 -1.0
071
84 110 10 -0.2 34 90 10 -0.1 150 70 10 -0.8
072
0
-4.5 147.4 100 50 14.9 56.1 100 5 -3.3 073
105 112 10 0.9 29 81 10 -0.7 149 90 10 -0.9
074
#
#
#
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 15 of 62
Table 2: Results and z-Scores for Endosulfan l (alpha), EPN and Etofenprox
laboratory number
analyte
Endosulfan I (alpha) EPN Etofenprox
assigned value: 125 µg/kg assigned value: 48.6 µg/kg assigned value: 105 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
001
145 89 10 0.7 44 95 10 -0.4 111 92 10 0.2
002
146 93 10 0.8 56 91 10 0.7 144 93 10 1.7
003
92.95 102.40 10 -1.2 #
#
004
113.8 75.7 10 -0.4 #
119.9 93.7 10 0.6
005
109 92 10 -0.6 33.3 86 10 -1.4 77.0 72 10 -1.2
006
159 100 10 1.2 51 100 10 0.2 115 94 10 0.4
007
98.9 100.4 0.01 -1.0 #
95.6 104.5 0.01 -0.4
008
158 109 10 1.2 62 100 10 1.3 118 107 10 0.5
009
130
10 0.2 13.1
10 -3.3 127
10 0.9
010
#
#
83 88 5 -1.0
011
138 100 10 0.5 41 100 10 -0.7 104 100 10 -0.1
012
83.1 82 10 -1.5 #
83.1 129 10 -1.0
013
125 84 10 0.0 49 86 10 0.0 111 116 10 0.2
014
154 93.1 0.010 mg/kg
1.0 45 96.9 0.010 mg/kg
-0.3 104 97.0 0.010 mg/kg
-0.1
015
#
#
#
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 16 of 62
Table 2 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Endosulfan l (alpha), EPN and Etofenprox
laboratory number
analyte
Endosulfan I (alpha) EPN Etofenprox
assigned value: 125 µg/kg assigned value: 48.6 µg/kg assigned value: 105 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
016
161.3 99 10 1.3 49.5 103 10 0.1 98.3 92 10 -0.3
017
134 136 10.0 0.3 37.4 122 10.0 -1.0 95.8 124 10.0 -0.4
018
58.1
10 -2.5 #
#
019
100.84
-0.9 34.28
-1.3 85.76
-0.9
020
149
0.01 0.9 75
0.01 2.5 145 53 0.01 1.7
021
172 -14 10 1.7 #
100 -8.9 10 -0.2
022
#
#
#
023
#
#
#
024
132.4 82
0.3 47.0 78
-0.1 91.2 74
-0.6
025
139.68 105.27 10 0.5 54.96 104.24 10 0.6 109.54 105.73 10 0.2
026
113.4 89 10 -0.4 #
#
027
#
74.31 109.2 10 2.4 113.18 76 10 0.3
028
95 100 10 -1.1 39 100 10 -0.9 92 100 10 -0.6
029
131.2 94 10 0.2 46.1 103 10 -0.2 90.5 92 10 -0.6
030
130 95 10 0.2 27 80 10 -2.0 110 90 10 0.2
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 17 of 62
Table 2 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Endosulfan l (alpha), EPN and Etofenprox
laboratory number
analyte
Endosulfan I (alpha) EPN Etofenprox
assigned value: 125 µg/kg assigned value: 48.6 µg/kg assigned value: 105 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
031
149.9 124.7 34 0.9 48.3 127.2 34 0.0 114.7 163.0 10 0.4
032
127 85.3 50 0.1 40 80.5 10 -0.8 97 95.6 10 -0.4
033
0.11 112 0.005 -4.6 0.055 84 0.005 -4.5 0.12 94 0.005 -4.5 034
150
10 0.9 #
92
10 -0.6
035
142 94 5 0.6 62 113 5 1.3 127 115 5 0.9
036
95 100 10 -1.1 41 100 10 -0.7 91 70 10 -0.6
037
120 72.3 10 -0.2 #
140 96.6 10 1.5
038
105 98 3 -0.7 #
108 100 0.3 0.1
039
97.1 87 5 -1.0 31.3 95 5 -1.6 113 80 5 0.3
040
99
-1.0 28
-1.9 108
0.1
041
96 73 5 -1.1 33 93 5 -1.5 89 115 5 -0.7
042
162 107.1 0.01 mg/kg 1.3 56.5 105.1 0.01 mg/kg 0.7 108 107.9 0.01 mg/kg 0.1
043
97 103 10 -1.0 0
-4.5 0
-4.5 044
136.5 95 50 0.4 60.3 88.3 50 1.1 128.2 103.6 10 1.0
045
114 106 10 -0.4 40 106 10 -0.8 93 110 10 -0.5
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 18 of 62
Table 2 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Endosulfan l (alpha), EPN and Etofenprox
laboratory number
analyte
Endosulfan I (alpha) EPN Etofenprox
assigned value: 125 µg/kg assigned value: 48.6 µg/kg assigned value: 105 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
046
#
#
#
047
158 100 10 1.2 60 100 10 1.1 140 100 10 1.5
048
98 96 10 -1.0 39 81 10 -0.9 79 87 10 -1.1
049
72 85 10 -1.9 #
66 95 10 -1.7
050
#
49 91 10 0.0 #
051
#
#
#
052
151 92 10 0.9 45 102 10 -0.3 97 91 10 -0.4
053
134 93 10 0.3 50 97 10 0.1 105 102 10 0.0
054
101
-0.9 #
110
0.2
055
158 84.6 5 1.2 56 110.6 5 0.7 124 103.1 5 0.8
056
124.4 90.9 10 0.0 51.2 98.5 10 0.2 106.1 96.3 10 0.0
057
156
10 1.1 42
10 -0.6 89
10 -0.7
058
150.6 100 10 0.9 54.9 100 10 0.6 108.2 100 10 0.1
059
160 100 10 1.3 37 96 10 -1.1 130 100 10 1.1
060
133 131 10 0.3 56 82 10 0.7 140 115 10 1.5
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 19 of 62
Table 2 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Endosulfan l (alpha), EPN and Etofenprox
laboratory number
analyte
Endosulfan I (alpha) EPN Etofenprox
assigned value: 125 µg/kg assigned value: 48.6 µg/kg assigned value: 105 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
061
#
#
93.5
3 -0.5
062
110 95 10 -0.6 50 95 10 0.1 100 95 10 -0.2
063
60 70 10 -2.4 61 80 10 1.2 89 80 10 -0.7
064
119 94 10 -0.2 36 101 10 -1.2 79 103 10 -1.1
065
140 104 10 0.5 56 119 10 0.7 109 111 10 0.2
066
#
#
#
067
149 100 10 0.9 45 96 10 -0.3 126 99 10 0.9
068
140 79 5 0.5 55 120 10 0.6 110 107 10 0.2
069
0
-4.6 #
0
-4.5 070
31 81 10 -3.4 58 108 10 0.9 134 99 10 1.2
071
119 80 10 -0.2 40 120 10 -0.8 83 90 10 -1.0
072
0
-4.6 273.4 100 25 21.0 0
-4.5 073
103 91 10 -0.8 54 100 10 0.5 83 92 10 -1.0
074
89
10 -1.3 #
#
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 20 of 62
Table 3: Results and z-Scores for Fenamidone, Fluvalinate (tau) and Linuron
laboratory number
analyte
Fenamidone Fluvalinate (tau) Linuron
assigned value: 62.4 µg/kg assigned value: 75.5 µg/kg assigned value: 125 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
001
72 93 10 0.7 72 98 10 -0.2 117 92 10 -0.3
002
73 94 10 0.8 80 90 10 0.3 107 91 10 -0.6
003
#
69.79 96.60 10 -0.3 #
004
97.0 109.0 5 2.5 87.6 83.2 10 0.7 0
-4.6 005
47.4 75 10 -1.1 50.5 78 10 -1.5 142.3 100 10 0.6
006
74 105 10 0.8 84 100 10 0.5 132 104 10 0.3
007
53.0 103.0 0.01 -0.7 60.6 108.3 0.01 -0.9 91.8 102.9 0.01 -1.2
008
76 108 10 1.0 92 96 10 1.0 142 102 10 0.6
009
76.4
10 1.0 13.2
10 -3.8 128
10 0.1
010
54 97 5 -0.6 44
5 -1.9 113 82 5 -0.4
011
62 100 10 0.0 84 100 10 0.5 110 100 10 -0.5
012
49.4 95 10 -0.9 72.2 92 10 -0.2 108.8 96 10 -0.6
013
59 100 10 -0.2 105 84 10 1.8 125 100 10 0.0
014
65 94.4 0.010 mg/kg
0.2 74 95.0 0.010 mg/kg
-0.1 138 89.8 0.010 mg/kg
0.5
015
#
#
#
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 21 of 62
Table 3 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Fenamidone, Fluvalinate (tau) and Linuron
laboratory number
analyte
Fenamidone Fluvalinate (tau) Linuron
assigned value: 62.4 µg/kg assigned value: 75.5 µg/kg assigned value: 125 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
016
47.8 93 10 -1.1 84.2 122 10 0.5 0
-4.6 017
61.3 101 10.0 -0.1 81.0 124 10.0 0.3 129 124 10.0 0.2
018
#
#
#
019
50.32
-0.9 56.58
-1.1 127.8
0.1
020
89 77 0.01 1.9 111
0.01 2.1 177 83 0.01 1.9
021
#
78 13 10 0.1 131 0.2 10 0.2
022
#
#
#
023
49.83 93 10 -0.9 #
140 85 10 0.6
024
53.0 108
-0.7 74.1 86
-0.1 133.4 110
0.3
025
#
79.47 108.42 10 0.2 130.10 90.33 10 0.2
026
55.4 72 10 -0.5 #
61.1 92.8 10 -2.3 027
53.39 110.03 10 -0.7 #
130.35 115.9 10 0.2
028
65 100 10 0.2 73 100 10 -0.2 130 100 10 0.2
029
0
-4.5 101.7 103 10 1.6 115.3 112 10 -0.3
030
69 90 10 0.5 19 110 10 -3.4 127 95 10 0.1
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 22 of 62
Table 3 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Fenamidone, Fluvalinate (tau) and Linuron
laboratory number
analyte
Fenamidone Fluvalinate (tau) Linuron
assigned value: 62.4 µg/kg assigned value: 75.5 µg/kg assigned value: 125 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
031
63.7 82.0 10 0.1 135 122.1 67 3.6 107.2 90.1 67 -0.6
032
62 113.1 10 0.0 #
125 123.3 10 0.0
033
0.063 98 0.005 -4.5 0.11 80 0.005 -4.5 0.14 95 0.005 -4.6 034
#
#
#
035
63 94 5 0.0 104 73 5 1.7 132 109 5 0.3
036
58 90 10 -0.3 67 70 10 -0.5 132 80 10 0.3
037
77 80.7 10 1.1 78 113.2 10 0.1 0
-4.6 038
#
#
120 99 0.8 -0.2
039
59.9 78 5 -0.2 58.1 88 5 -1.0 126 81 5 0.0
040
#
#
126
0.0
041
51 109 5 -0.8 53 67 5 -1.4 102 97 5 -0.8
042
65.4 111.5 0.01 mg/kg 0.2 69.7 87.2 0.01 mg/kg -0.4 134 104.4 0.01 mg/kg 0.3
043
78 87 5 1.1 0
-4.5 161 98 10 1.3
044
90.9 107.6 10 2.1 93 117.5 10 1.1 124.6 92 10 0.0
045
52 108 10 -0.8 69 105 10 -0.4 126 111 10 0.0
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 23 of 62
Table 3 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Fenamidone, Fluvalinate (tau) and Linuron
laboratory number
analyte
Fenamidone Fluvalinate (tau) Linuron
assigned value: 62.4 µg/kg assigned value: 75.5 µg/kg assigned value: 125 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
046
62.155 96.25 10 0.0 #
94 78.7 10 -1.1
047
72 100 10 0.7 80 100 10 0.3 145 100 10 0.7
048
47 77 10 -1.1 #
108 108 10 -0.6
049
63 90 10 0.0 49 95 10 -1.6 119 90 10 -0.2
050
#
#
115 99 10 -0.4
051
185.53 640.23 10 9.0 #
565.41 536.87 10 16.1 052
66 102 10 0.3 57 100 10 -1.1 136 82 10 0.4
053
66 106 10 0.3 67 96 10 -0.5 139 96 10 0.5
054
#
#
122
-0.1
055
66 99.7 5 0.3 52 94.4 5 -1.4 132 99.6 5 0.3
056
#
91.9 126.9 10 1.0 123.4 94.7 10 0.0
057
56
10 -0.5 71
10 -0.3 80
10 -1.6
058
67.7 100 10 0.4 105.3 100 10 1.8 145.9 100 10 0.8
059
54 99 10 -0.6 88 102 10 0.7 185 102 10 2.2 060
69 115 10 0.5 95 93 20 1.2 155 113 10 1.1
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 24 of 62
Table 3 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Fenamidone, Fluvalinate (tau) and Linuron
laboratory number
analyte
Fenamidone Fluvalinate (tau) Linuron
assigned value: 62.4 µg/kg assigned value: 75.5 µg/kg assigned value: 125 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
061
#
#
#
062
59 95 10 -0.2 80 95 10 0.3 130 95 10 0.2
063
52 90 10 -0.8 40 80 10 -2.1 141 80 10 0.6
064
51 107 10 -0.8 54 109 10 -1.3 106 86 10 -0.7
065
#
95 132 10 1.2 140 115 10 0.6
066
#
#
#
067
63 99 10 0.0 85 102 10 0.6 152 101 10 1.0
068
72 96 10 0.7 70 110 10 -0.3 108 101 10 -0.6
069
170.64 88 10 7.9 0
-4.5 135.96 89 10 0.4
070
80 89 10 1.3 32 84 10 -2.6 71 86 10 -2.0
071
40 80 10 -1.6 58 120 10 -1.1 100 100 10 -0.9
072
28.5 100 5 -2.5 0
-4.5 63.2 100 5 -2.3 073
38 104 10 -1.8 87 100 10 0.7 101 100 10 -0.9
074
56
20 -0.5 #
#
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 25 of 62
Table 4: Results and z-Scores for Pyriproxyfen and Tebuconazole
laboratory number
analyte
Pyriproxyfen Tebuconazole assigned value: 106 µg/kg assigned value: 129 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
001
113 94 10 0.3 131 90 10 0.1
002
108 87 10 0.1 121 89 10 -0.3
003
40.76 109.00 10 -2.8 42.17 82.17 10 -3.1 004
94.6 100 5 -0.5 133.8 88.8 5 0.2
005
79.9 78 10 -1.1 90.3 78 10 -1.4
006
119 97 10 0.6 138 98 10 0.3
007
70.7 97.4 0.01 -1.5 93.8 93.5 0.01 -1.3
008
128 114 10 0.9 136 102 10 0.3
009
127
10 0.9 148
10 0.7
010
87 110 5 -0.8 112 96 5 -0.6
011
105 100 10 0.0 127 100 10 -0.1
012
81.3 96 10 -1.1 94.6 89 10 -1.2
013
117 92 10 0.5 132 84 10 0.1
014
117 92.8 0.010 mg/kg 0.5 160 94.4 0.010 mg/kg 1.1
015
#
#
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 26 of 62
Table 4 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Pyriproxyfen and Tebuconazole
laboratory number
analyte
Pyriproxyfen Tebuconazole assigned value: 106 µg/kg assigned value: 129 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
016
109.1 99 10 0.1 123.0 89 10 -0.2
017
104 122 10.0 -0.1 131 112 10.0 0.1
018
#
#
019
85.2
-0.9 112.49
-0.6
020
151 51 0.01 1.9 209 70 0.01 2.9 021
125 -4.8 10 0.8 131 0.4 10 0.1
022
#
#
023
108.07 87 10 0.1 156.05 88 10 1.0
024
130.2 118
1.0 151.1 92
0.8
025
121.40 104.52 10 0.7 143.57 97.75 10 0.5
026
45.1 98 10 -2.6 106.9 88 10 -0.8
027
106.86 106.86 10 0.0 121.91 102 10 -0.2
028
125 100 10 0.8 132 100 10 0.1
029
75.3 105 10 -1.3 141.9 102 10 0.5
030
91 100 10 -0.6 140 90 10 0.4
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 27 of 62
Table 4 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Pyriproxyfen and Tebuconazole
laboratory number
analyte
Pyriproxyfen Tebuconazole assigned value: 106 µg/kg assigned value: 129 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
031
132.4 103.6 10 1.1 120.7 84.0 34 -0.3
032
124 90.3 10 0.8 133 93.5 10 0.1
033
0.044 89 0.01 -4.5 0.15 108 0.01 -4.6 034
89
10 -0.7 214
10 3.0
035
135 108 5 1.2 155 102 5 0.9
036
88 110 10 -0.8 105 100 10 -0.9
037
200 78.3 10 4.0 210 93.2 10 2.9 038
#
#
039
107 87 5 0.0 138 87 5 0.3
040
125
0.8 172
1.5
041
67 76 5 -1.7 91 102 5 -1.4
042
#
115 110.9 0.01 mg/kg -0.5
043
83 114 10 -1.0 119 96 10 -0.4
044
131.2 85 10 1.1 176.6 100.1 10 1.7
045
93 94 10 -0.6 123 106 10 -0.2
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 28 of 62
Table 4 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Pyriproxyfen and Tebuconazole
laboratory number
analyte
Pyriproxyfen Tebuconazole assigned value: 106 µg/kg assigned value: 129 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
046
83.71 108 10 -1.0 75 74.9 10 -1.9
047
142 100 10 1.5 172 100 10 1.5
048
87 93 10 -0.8 123 99 10 -0.2
049
68 95 10 -1.6 64 90 10 -2.3 050
#
129 89 10 0.0
051
16406.80 14133.16 10 698.3 #
052
118 102 10 0.5 143 102 10 0.5
053
127 107 10 0.9 151 97 10 0.8
054
114
0.3 152
0.8
055
127 100.2 5 0.9 153 107.5 5 0.9
056
122.0 98.2 10 0.7 154.1 97.4 10 0.9
057
55
10 -2.2 57
10 -2.6 058
127.1 100 10 0.9 135.8 100 10 0.2
059
100 99 10 -0.3 146 101 10 0.6
060
139 119 10 1.4 166 119 10 1.3
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 29 of 62
Table 4 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Pyriproxyfen and Tebuconazole
laboratory number
analyte
Pyriproxyfen Tebuconazole assigned value: 106 µg/kg assigned value: 129 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
061
76.9
3 -1.3 33.9
3 -3.4 062
105 95 10 0.0 130 95 10 0.0
063
98 110 10 -0.3 105 80 10 -0.9
064
89 108 10 -0.7 96 97 10 -1.2
065
116 102 10 0.4 151 111 10 0.8
066
#
#
067
130 98 10 1.0 132 102 10 0.1
068
113 119 3 0.3 131 106 3 0.1
069
177.95 88 10 3.1 21.49 92 10 -3.8 070
126 107 10 0.9 135 92 10 0.2
071
100 80 10 -0.3 125 90 10 -0.1
072
18.3 100 5 -3.8 96.8 100 5 -1.1
073
95 88 10 -0.5 148 103 10 0.7
074
80
100 -1.1 #
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 30 of 62
Table 5: Results and z-Scores for Triazophos and Triflumuron
laboratory number
analyte
Triazophos Triflumuron assigned value: 41.1 µg/kg assigned value: 103 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
001
48 93 10 0.8 100 95 10 -0.1
002
43 93 10 0.2 91 88 10 -0.5
003
25.75 73.58 10 -1.7 #
004
65.7 102.9 5 2.7 92.1 108.4 5 -0.5
005
30.7 70 10 -1.1 114.4 95 10 0.5
006
51 112 10 1.1 107 103 10 0.2
007
37.4 93.5 0.01 -0.4 #
008
40 108 10 -0.1 120 112 10 0.8
009
44.6
10 0.4 78.0
10 -1.1
010
33 102 5 -0.9 82 103 5 -0.9
011
40 100 10 -0.1 80 100 10 -1.0
012
33.7 95 10 -0.8 #
013
50 106 10 1.0 99 102 10 -0.2
014
49 89.3 0.010 mg/kg 0.9 121 93.4 0.010 mg/kg 0.8
015
38.7 94.2 10 -0.3 #
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 31 of 62
Table 5 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Triazophos and Triflumuron
laboratory number
analyte
Triazophos Triflumuron assigned value: 41.1 µg/kg assigned value: 103 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
016
41.3 86 10 0.0 96.7 96 10 -0.3
017
41.0 123 10.0 0.0 123 120 10.0 0.9
018
#
#
019
35.94
-0.6 108.93
0.3
020
57
0.01 1.8 134
0.01 1.4
021
48 27 10 0.8 111 16 10 0.4
022
40.42 96.98 5 -0.1 #
023
#
180 85 10 3.4 024
42.8 90
0.2 120.0 119
0.8
025
42.38 100.59 10 0.1 #
026
45.9 105 10 0.5 63.8 70 10 -1.7
027
#
#
028
32 100 10 -1.0 104 100 10 0.1
029
37.8 105 10 -0.4 97 89 10 -0.2
030
42 100 10 0.1 112 90 10 0.4
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 32 of 62
Table 5 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Triazophos and Triflumuron
laboratory number
analyte
Triazophos Triflumuron assigned value: 41.1 µg/kg assigned value: 103 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
031
43.1 110.6 34 0.2 #
032
45 110.5 10 0.4 95 113.4 10 -0.3
033
0.051 96 0.005 -4.5 0
-4.5 034
0
-4.5 #
035
42 105 5 0.1 114 88 5 0.5
036
30 90 10 -1.2 85 120 10 -0.8
037
61 93.2 10 2.2 140 95.3 10 1.7
038
#
#
039
37.9 84 5 -0.4 89.7 88 5 -0.6
040
47
0.7 122
0.9
041
22 79 5 -2.1 30 115 5 -3.2 042
42.0 108.5 0.01 mg/kg 0.1 107 111 0.01 mg/kg 0.2
043
85 89 5 4.9 193 96 5 4.0 044
48.1 120 10 0.8 81.3 102.3 10 -0.9
045
36 88 10 -0.6 100 116 10 -0.1
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 33 of 62
Table 5 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Triazophos and Triflumuron
laboratory number
analyte
Triazophos Triflumuron assigned value: 41.1 µg/kg assigned value: 103 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
046
#
#
047
43 100 10 0.2 118 100 10 0.7
048
37 98 10 -0.5 87 117 10 -0.7
049
28 85 10 -1.4 72 95 10 -1.4
050
41 88 10 0.0 #
051
#
#
052
43 102 10 0.2 #
053
43 101 10 0.2 136 99 10 1.5
054
43
0.2 99
-0.2
055
52 109.5 10 1.2 99 96.8 5 -0.2
056
43.2 94.5 10 0.2 #
057
35
10 -0.7 109
10 0.3
058
39.4 100 10 -0.2 #
059
43 99 10 0.2 130 99 10 1.2
060
44 108 10 0.3 0
10 -4.5
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 34 of 62
Table 5 (continued): Results and z-Scores for Triazophos and Triflumuron
laboratory number
analyte
Triazophos Triflumuron assigned value: 41.1 µg/kg assigned value: 103 µg/kg
result % Rec LoQ z-score result % Rec LoQ z-score
061
#
66.2
3 -1.6
062
49 95 10 0.9 97 95 10 -0.2
063
45 75 10 0.4 122 80 10 0.9
064
25 104 10 -1.8 94 86 10 -0.4
065
39 98 10 -0.2 #
066
#
#
067
32 99 10 -1.0 201 99 10 4.4 068
47 104 10 0.7 99 113 10 -0.2
069
36.35 89 10 -0.5 0
-4.5 070
44 109 10 0.3 77 84 10 -1.1
071
33 90 10 -0.9 92 100 10 -0.5
072
153.3 100 25 12.4 0
-4.5 073
36 100 10 -0.6 93 93 10 -0.4
074
33
10 -0.9 #
z-scores outside |z| >2 are shown in bold, see Section 5
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 35 of 62
Table 6: Additional Pesticide Residues Reported
laboratory number pesticide residue ≥15 μg/kg result μg/kg
recovery %
LoQ μg/kg
018 Cyhalothrin-lambda 31.1 10
023 Flonicamid 322.34 91 10
024 Chlordane (trans) 28.8 72
037 Chlordane (trans) 90 100 10
040 Chlordane (trans) 27
040 Dieldrin 62
043 Carbofuran 90 110 10
055 Chlordane (trans) 60 89.8 5
069 Endosulfan II (beta) 52.69 90 10
069 Fenpropimorph 53.66 91 10
072 2,4-D (free acid only) 462 100 10
072 Azinphos-ethyl 172.1 100 50
072 THPI 39.2 100 25
Table 7: Participants’ Comments
laboratory number comments
005 cis chlordane was calculated from a technichal mix of known purity.
023 Compound not in list but detected are Clethodim 114.3 ug/kg and Forchlorfenuron 145.36 ug/kg
027 We received the sample not in good condition. Stay 2 days in Fed Ex facilities without keeping in Freezer or Refrigerator.
034 on Blank sample Etofenprox detected but not quantified (< 10 ppb)
037 All results reported above are in ug/kg (ppb) as well as the LoQ. Please note that we as a Laboratory use Chlordane as a Technical mixture and report it as Chlordane and do not report it individually therefore we have included both as Cis and Trans and gi
047 We also found traces of Hexythiazox at 3 µg/kg
051 PT was held up in customs during shipment; it was shipped April 16 and arrived April 24. PT may not have been properly refrigerated during that time period and could have adversely affected our results.
055 Spuren von Hexythiazox gefunden
059 Hexythiazox has been detected below LoQ
070 We do not differentiate between cis or trans Chlordan, the MRL applies to the sum. For this submission we choose the cis entry.
comments are as submitted by participants but some may have been edited to maintain participant anonymity
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 36 of 62
Table 8: Assigned Values and Standard Deviations for Proficiency
analyte data points, n
assigned value, xₐ µg/kg
uncertainty, u
standard deviation for proficiency, σp
Acetochlor 36 88.3 2.7 Horwitz [9] 19.4
Chlordane (cis) 39 34.4 1.3 Horwitz [9] 7.58
Dimethoate 56 182 5 Horwitz [9] 37.6
Endosulfan I (alpha) 50 125 4 Horwitz [9] 27.4
EPN 44 48.6 1.6 Horwitz [9] 10.7
Etofenprox 48 105 3 Horwitz [9] 23.2
Fenamidone 51 62.4 1.7 Horwitz [9] 13.7
Fluvalinate (tau) 45 75.5 3.0 Horwitz [9] 16.6
Linuron 54 125 3 Horwitz [9] 27.3
Pyriproxyfen 54 106 3 Horwitz [9] 23.3
Tebuconazole 57 129 3 Horwitz [9] 28.1
Triazophos 55 41.1 1.0 Horwitz [9] 9.04
Triflumuron 41 103 3 Horwitz [9] 22.6
Table 9: Number and Percentage of z-Scores where |z| ≤2
analyte number of scores where |z| ≤2
total number of scores
% |z|≤2
Acetochlor 39 45 87
Chlordane (cis) 37 50 74
Dimethoate 61 69 88
Endosulfan I (alpha) 58 64 91
EPN 46 52 88
Etofenprox 59 63 94
Fenamidone 52 59 88
Fluvalinate (tau) 46 56 82
Linuron 58 66 88
Pyriproxyfen 59 67 88
Tebuconazole 58 67 87
Triazophos 59 66 89
Triflumuron 46 54 85
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 37 of 62
Figure 1: z-Scores for Acetochlor
43 69 70 72 33 28 41 64 39 5 36 29 19 11 57 30 17 63 53 45 50 71 47 67 31 1 56 13 16 9 4 6 35 2 24 25 44 62 65 59 73 20 8 32 37
127 µg/kg
88.3 µg/kg
49.4 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 38 of 62
Figure 2: z-Scores for Chlordane (cis)
26 30 43 55 64 49 59 48 41 17 5 39 29 73 19 36 45 24 11 28 68 7 9 8 65 67 71 42 1 16 35 53 31 56 62 25 47 13 2 57 44 6 20 37 60 4 69 70 72 32
49.6 µg/kg
34.4 µg/kg
19.3 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 39 of 62
Figure 3: z-Scores for Dimethoate
33 72 3 64 61 31 18 69 70 73 71 32 46 7 4 10 45 36 48 65 41 52 49 39 44 12 57 2 16 19 26 50 43 13 21 58 1 68 35 11 9 56 63 6 40 34 5 8 28 37 42 54 55 38 47 60 62 29 53 25 30 14 27 59 67 24 51 20 23
257 µg/kg
182 µg/kg
107 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 40 of 62
Figure 4: z-Scores for Endosulfan I (alpha)
69 72 33 70 18 63 49 12 74 3 28 36 41 43 39 48 7 40 19 54 73 38 5 62 26 4 45 64 71 37 56 13 32 9 30 29 24 60 17 53 44 11 25 65 68 35 1 2 20 67 31 34 58 52 14 57 8 47 55 6 59 16 42 21
180 µg/kg
125 µg/kg
70.5 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 41 of 62
Figure 5: z-Scores for EPN
43 33 9 30 40 39 41 5 19 64 59 17 28 48 32 45 71 11 36 57 1 14 52 67 29 24 31 13 50 16 53 62 6 56 73 58 25 68 2 55 60 65 42 70 47 44 63 8 35 27 20 72
69.9 µg/kg
48.6 µg/kg
27.2 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 42 of 62
Figure 6: z-Scores for Etofenprox
43 69 72 33 49 5 48 64 10 71 73 12 19 41 57 63 29 36 24 28 34 45 61 7 17 32 52 16 21 62 11 14 53 56 38 40 42 58 65 25 30 54 68 1 13 39 27 31 6 8 4 55 67 9 35 44 59 70 37 47 60 2 20
152 µg/kg
105 µg/kg
59.1 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 43 of 62
Figure 7: z-Scores for Fenamidone
29 33 72 73 71 48 5 16 12 23 19 41 64 45 63 7 24 27 10 59 26 57 74 36 13 62 39 17 11 32 46 35 49 67 31 14 28 42 52 53 55 58 30 60 1 47 68 2 6 8 9 37 43 70 20 44 4 69 51
89.8 µg/kg
62.4 µg/kg
34.9 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 44 of 62
Figure 8: z-Scores for Fluvalinate (tau)
43 69 72 33 9 30 70 63 10 49 5 55 41 64 19 52 71 39 7 36 53 45 42 3 68 57 1 12 28 14 24 21 37 25 2 47 62 17 6 11 16 67 73 4 59 56 8 44 60 65 29 35 13 58 20 31
109 µg/kg
75.5 µg/kg
42.3 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 45 of 62
Figure 9: z-Scores for Linuron
4 16 37 33 26 72 70 57 7 46 71 73 41 64 2 31 48 68 12 11 10 50 29 1 49 38 54 56 44 13 32 39 40 45 30 19 9 17 28 62 25 27 21 6 35 36 55 24 42 69 52 14 53 23 65 63 8 5 47 58 67 60 43 20 59 51
179 µg/kg
125 µg/kg
70.2 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 46 of 62
Figure 10: z-Scores for Pyriproxyfen
33 72 3 26 57 41 49 7 29 61 5 74 12 43 46 19 10 48 36 34 64 30 45 4 73 63 59 71 17 11 62 27 39 2 23 16 1 68 54 65 13 14 52 6 25 56 32 21 28 40 70 9 53 55 58 8 67 24 44 31 35 60 47 20 69 37 51
153 µg/kg
106 µg/kg
59.4 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 47 of 62
Figure 11: z-Scores for Tebuconazole
33 69 61 3 57 49 46 5 41 7 12 64 72 36 63 26 10 19 42 43 31 2 27 16 45 48 71 11 50 62 1 17 21 68 13 28 67 32 4 70 58 8 6 39 30 29 52 25 59 9 73 53 65 24 54 55 56 35 23 14 60 40 47 44 20 37 34
185 µg/kg
129 µg/kg
72.8 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 48 of 62
Figure 12: z-Scores for Triazophos
34 33 41 64 3 49 36 5 28 67 10 71 74 12 57 19 45 73 69 48 7 29 39 15 65 58 8 11 22 17 50 16 30 35 42 25 24 2 47 52 53 54 59 31 56 60 70 9 32 63 26 40 68 1 21 44 14 62 13 6 55 20 37 4 43 72
59.2 µg/kg
41.1 µg/kg
23.0 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 49 of 62
Figure 13: z-Scores for Triflumuron
33 60 69 72 41 26 61 49 70 9 11 44 10 36 48 39 2 71 4 73 64 32 16 29 62 13 54 55 68 1 45 28 6 42 19 57 21 30 35 5 47 8 24 14 40 63 17 59 20 53 37 23 43 67148 µg/kg
103 µg/kg
57.5 µg/kg
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
z-score
Laboratory Number
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 50 of 62
APPENDIX I: Analytical Methods Used by Participants
Methods are tabulated according to the information supplied by participants, but some responses may have been combined or edited for clarity.
Accredited Method Used laboratory number
no 014 023 024 035 044 052
yes 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 015 016 017 019 020 021 022 026 027 029 030 031 032 033 036 037 038 041 042 045 046 047 049 050 051 053 054 055 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 066 068 071 073
Method Based On laboratory number
International Standard 002 008 010 013 014 020 023 026 027 029 030 032 033 035 036 037 041 042 044 045 046 050 053 057 059 060 063 064 066 067 068
National Standard 001 006 011 022 038 054 055
Paper Published In An International Journal
003 009 015 016 052 058 071
Manufacturer/Kit Instructions/Technical Note
007 021
In house method 004 005 012 017 019 024 031 047 049 051 061 062 073
Quoted percentage recovery measured in same analytical batch as test material
laboratory number
no 004 009 045 049 053 059 066
yes 001 002 003 005 006 007 008 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 019 020 021 022 023 024 026 027 029 030 031 032 033 035 036 037 038 041 042 044 046 047 050 051 052 054 055 057 058 060 062 063 064 068 071 073
If measured in this batch, stage spike added
laboratory number
prior to extraction 001 002 003 005 006 007 008 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 019 020 021 022 023 024 027 029 030 031 032 033 035 037 038 041 042 044 045 046 047 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 057 058 060 062 063 064 067 068 071 073
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 51 of 62
If measured in this batch, stage spike added (continued)
laboratory number
prior to clean up 026
Concentration of Spike (µg/kg) laboratory number
≥5 - <10 018 022 036 055 063 068
≥10 - <25 003 007 013 017 021 027 029 032 033 041 044 045 046 049 050 052 057 058 071
≥25 - <50 047 054
≥50 - <100 002 004 006 008 010 011 012 015 016 019 020 024 030 035 051 060 064 073
≥100 001 005 014 023 026 038 042 053 059 062 067
Composition of Blank Commodity used for Spiking
laboratory number
blank provided 001 002 005 007 008 011 013 014 015 016 019 020 021 022 023 024 026 030 031 035 036 037 038 041 044 045 046 047 049 050 051 052 053 054 058 059 060 061 062 063 067 071 073
blank from our laboratory 033 057 068
blank commodity from former analysis 055
Carrot 017
comercial blank 010 027 032 042
Fresh lemon fruit 029
Matriz de limon 012
organic lemon 006
Calibration laboratory number
standard addition 006 041 047 051 062
matrix-matched 001 002 004 005 006 007 008 009 011 014 019 021 022 023 024 026 027 029 031 033 035 037 038 041 042 044 045 046 049 051 052 053 054 055 057 058 059 060 064 067 068
solvent 002 010 015 032 035 050 063
multi-level 002 003 010 012 013 015 016 017 018 020 024 030 035 036 041 042 051 052 055 057 061 064 066 071 073
single-level 002 006
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 52 of 62
Internal Standard Added laboratory number
no 001 004 010 012 018 022 023 024 029 038 044 052 061 063
yes 002 005 006 007 008 009 011 013 014 015 016 017 019 020 021 027 030 031 032 033 035 036 037 041 042 045 046 047 049 050 051 053 054 055 057 058 059 060 062 064 066 068 071 073
Internal Standard Used laboratory number
ANTRACENO D10 and ISOPROTURON D6
009
Atrazine and Tionazin 032
Atrazine-d5 016
CAFFEINE 068
chlorpyrifos d10, difenoconazol d6, isoproturon d6
055
Isodrin, HCH-alpha 008
Linuron D6, Chlorpyrifos D10 041
only to check extraction efficiency 002
ORTOFENIL TRIFOSFATO 019
PCB 31/Sulfotep 011 059 067
PCB, HBB 006
PCB-108 062
PCB209 066
PCB52 027 046
Phenanthrene-d10, TDPP 064
Several 049
TPP 005 006 007 008 013 014 015 017 020 021 026 030 033 035 036 042 045 047 0051 54 058 060 062 064 071 073
Carbaryl-d7 058
Sulprophos 073
Carbendazime-D4, Acetamiprid-D3, Tiacloprid-D4, Clotianidina-D3
007
Pirimicarb D6 060
Malathion-d10, Carbendazim-d3, Dichlorvos-D6
014
Trifenil metano - Atrazina D5 - Nicarbazin
053
TRIS 050
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 53 of 62
GC Method: Sample Weight (g) laboratory number
010
≥1 - <5 001 011 012 026 038 054 062
≥5 - <10 006 008 015 016 018 022 041 047 058 059 066 073
≥10 - <20 002 003 004 005 007 009 013 014 017 019 021 024 027 029 030 032 033 035 036 042 044 045 046 049 052 053 055 057 060 063 067 068 071
≥20 - <50 020 031 064
GC Method: Extraction Solvent Components
laboratory number
acetone 020 064
acetonitrile 001 002 004 005 006 007 008 009 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 021 022 024 026 027 029 031 033 036 038 041 042 044 045 046 047 052 053 054 055 057 058 059 060 062 063 066 067 068 071 073
ethyl acetate 003 020 032 049
water 020 041
Acetic acid 052
cyclohexane 020
Quechers extraction 035
GC Method: Extraction pH Adjusted laboratory number
no 003 004 005 009 011 012 019 021 022 024 030 031 032 035 036 038 044 045 047 051 052 053 059 063 066 068 071
yes 001 002 006 007 008 013 014 015 016 017 018 020 026 027 029 033 041 042 046 049 054 055 057 058 060 062 073
GC Method: Extraction Techniques Used
laboratory number
macerate at room temperature 031
QuEChERS 001 002 004 005 006 007 008 009 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 021 022 024 026 027 029 032 033 035 036 038 041 042 044 045 046 047 049 052 053 054 055 057 058 059 060 062 063 064 066 067 068 071 073
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 54 of 62
GC Method: Extraction Techniques Used (continued)
laboratory number
liquid-liquid partition 003 030 064
DFG S19 020
GC Method: Sample Clean-up Technique
laboratory number
GPC/HPGPC 046
liquid-liquid partition 020 030
none 003 011 022 038 049 059 063 067
solid phase extraction (SPE) (column/cartridge)
016 031 064
solid phase extraction (SPE) (dispersive)
001 002 004 005 006 007 008 009 012 013 014 015 017 018 019 021 026 027 029 032 033 035 036 041 042 044 045 047 052 053 054 055 057 058 060 062 066 068 071 073
Quechers DSPE 024
GC Method: SPE Sorbent Type laboratory number
C18 004 005 007 013 024 027 030 032 041 059
Envicarb/GCB 026 031
PSA 001 002 004 006 008 009 012 014 015 017 018 019 021 024 029 033 035 036 042 044 045 046 052 053 054 055 057 058 060 062 066 068 071
Mixed Mode 016 047 073
MgSO4 024 071
GC Method: GC Column Packing laboratory number
65% methyl 35% phenyl polysiloxane 030
95% methyl 5% phenyl polysiloxane 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 011 013 014 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 024 026 029 032 033 038 041 044 045 046 047 049 052 053 054 055 057 058 059 060 062 063 066 067 068 073
5% diphenyl / 95 % dimethyl polysiloxane
027
5% Phenyl-Methyl Siloxane 071
5%DIPHENYL 95%DIMETHYL POLSYLOXANE
042
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 55 of 62
GC Method: GC Column Packing (continued)
laboratory number
Agilent HP-5MS UI 035
DB-5MS ultra inert 015
Vf-5 012
GC Method: GC Detector Type laboratory number
ECD 018
FPD 022
MS 002 004 006 020 031 032 060 062 066
MS-MS 001 002 003 005 006 007 008 009 011 012 013 015 016 017 019 021 024 026 027 029 030 033 035 036 038 041 042 044 045 046 047 049 051 052 053 054 055 057 058 059 060 062 063 067 068 071 073
Orbitrap 014
PFPD 018
LC Method: Sample Weight (g) laboratory number
≥1 - <5 001 011 012 026 038 050 054 062
≥5 - <10 006 008 015 016 020 023 037 041 047 058 059 073
≥10 - <20 002 004 005 007 009 010 013 014 017 019 021 024 029 030 031 032 033 035 036 042 044 045 046 049 051 052 053 055 057 060 061 063 064 067 068 071
LC Method: Extraction Solvent Components
laboratory number
acetone 055
acetonitrile 001 002 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 019 020 021 023 024 026 029 031 032 033 036 038 041 042 044 045 046 047 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 067 068 071 073
methanol 037
Acetic Acid 052
Quechers extraction 035
water 041
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 56 of 62
LC Method: Extraction pH Adjusted laboratory number
no 004 009 011 012 019 021 023 024 030 031 032 035 036 038 045 047 050 051 052 053 059 063 068 071
yes 001 002 006 007 008 010 013 014 015 016 017 020 029 033 041 042 044 046 049 054 055 057 058 060 061 062 073
LC Method: Extraction Techniques Used
laboratory number
QuEChERS 001 002 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 019 020 021 023 024 026 029 031 032 033 035 036 038 041 042 044 045 046 047 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 067 068 071 073
liquid-liquid partition 030 037
LC Method: Sample Clean-up Technique
laboratory number
GPC/HPGPC 046
liquid-liquid partition 030
none 009 011 014 031 035 037 038 047 049 059 063 067
solid phase extraction (SPE) (column/cartridge)
005 016 026
solid phase extraction (SPE) (dispersive)
001 002 004 006 007 008 010 012 013 015 017 019 020 021 023 029 032 033 036 041 042 044 045 050 051 052 053 054 055 057 058 060 061 062 064 068 071 073
Quechers DSPE 024
LC Method: SPE Sorbent Type laboratory number
C18 004 007 013 024 030 032 041 059
Envicarb/GCB 026
PSA 001 002 004 006 008 010 012 015 017 019 020 021 024 029 033 036 042 044 045 046 051 052 053 054 055 057 058 060 061 068 071
NH2 005
Mixed Mode 016 023 073
MgSO4 024 071
phase seperation 062
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 57 of 62
LC Method: HPLC Column Packing laboratory number
C18 001 002 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 015 016 017 019 020 021 023 024 026 029 030 032 033 035 036 038 041 042 045 046 047 049 050 051 052 053 054 057 058 060 062 063 064 067 068 071 073
C8 014 059
Mixed Mode 037
biphenyl 044 061
LC method: Mobile Phase Components
laboratory number
ethanoic acid (acetic acid) 032 037
acetonitrile 001 004 005 011 012 029 031 032 033 050 054 055
ammonium acetate 006 007 031
ammonium formate 002 009 010 012 013 014 015 016 020 023 024 029 032 033 035 036 038 041 046 047 052 053 057 060 062 063 068 071 073
formic acid (methanoic acid) 005 007 012 013 014 017 024 029 033 041 046 052 055 062 073
methanol 002 004 006 007 008 010 013 015 016 017 020 021 023 024 035 036 037 041 042 044 045 046 047 049 051 052 057 058 059 060 061 062 067 068 071 073
water 002 004 005 006 007 010 011 012 015 016 017 020 021 024 026 029 030 032 033 035 036 037 041 042 044 046 047 050 051 052 055 060 061 062 063 064 071 073
LC Method: Detector Type laboratory number
MS-MS 001 002 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 015 016 017 019 020 021 023 024 026 029 030 031 032 033 035 036 037 038 041 042 044 045 046 047 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 057 058 059 060 061 062 064 067 068 071 073
Orbitrap 014
Q-TOF 063
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 58 of 62
Acetochlor
Method Principle laboratory number
GC 024 053 062 071
LC 032
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
yes 024 032 053 062 071
Chlordane (cis)
Method Principle laboratory number
GC 007 024 032 042 053 060 062 071
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
yes 007 024 032 042 053 060 062 071
Dimethoate
Method Principle laboratory number
GC 018 021 042 052 053
LC 007 010 023 024 032 051 060 062 071
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
no 018
yes 007 010 021 023 024 032 042 051 052 053 060 062 071
Endosulfan I (alpha)
Method Principle laboratory number
GC 007 018 021 024 032 042 052 053 060 062 071
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 59 of 62
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
no 018
yes 007 021 024 032 042 052 053 060 062 071
EPN
Method Principle laboratory number
GC 024 042 052 060 062 071
LC 032
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
yes 024 032 042 052 060 062 071
Etofenprox
Method Principle laboratory number
GC 007 021 024 042 052 060 062
LC 010 032 071
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
yes 007 010 021 024 032 042 052 060 062 071
Fenamidone
Method Principle laboratory number
GC 042 052
LC 007 010 023 024 032 051 060 062 071
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
yes 007 010 023 024 032 042 051 052 060 062 071
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 60 of 62
Fluvalinate (tau)
Method Principle laboratory number
GC 007 021 024 042 052 060 062 071
LC 010 053
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
yes 007 010 021 024 042 052 053 060 062 071
Linuron
Method Principle laboratory number
GC 042
LC 007 010 021 023 024 032 051 052 060 062 071
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
yes 007 010 021 023 024 032 042 051 052 060 062 071
Pyriproxyfen
Method Principle laboratory number
GC 007 021 052 053 060 071
LC 010 023 024 032 051 062
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
yes 007 010 021 023 024 032 051 052 060 062 071
Tebuconazole
Method Principle laboratory number
GC 021 042 052 062 071
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 61 of 62
Method Principle (continued) laboratory number
LC 007 010 023 024 032 060
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
yes 007 010 021 023 024 032 042 052 060 062 071
Triazophos
Method Principle laboratory number
GC 007 021 024 042 052
LC 010 032 060 062 071
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
yes 007 010 021 024 032 042 052 060 062 071
Triflumuron
Method Principle laboratory number
LC 010 021 023 024 032 042 062 071
Identification by Mass Spectrometry laboratory number
no 021
yes 010 023 024 032 042 062 071
NOT CONTROLL
ED WHEN PRIN
TED
Food Chem. Report 19248
Page 62 of 62
APPENDIX II: Fapas® SecureWeb, Protocol and Contact Details
1. Fapas® SECUREWEB
Access to the secure area of our website is only available to participants in our proficiency tests. Please contact us if you require a UserID and Password. Fapas® SecureWeb allows participants to:
• Obtain their laboratory numbers for the proficiency tests in which they have participated.
• View the results they submitted in past and current proficiency tests. • Submit their results and methods for current tests. • Review future tests they have ordered. • Order proficiency tests, reference materials and quality control materials. • Freely download copies of reports (PDF file), of proficiency tests in which they have
participated. • View charts of their z-scores obtained in previous Fapas® – Food Chemistry
proficiency tests.
2. PROTOCOL
The Protocols [4, 5] set out how Fapas® – Food Chemistry is organised. Copies can be downloaded from our website.
3. CONTACT DETAILS
This report was prepared and authorised on behalf of Fapas® by Simon Hunter (Round Coordinator). Participants with any comments or concerns about this proficiency test should contact:
Fapas® Fera Science Ltd (Fera)
National Agri-Food Innovation Campus Sand Hutton
York YO41 1LZ
UK
Tel: +44 (0)1904 462100 Fax: +44 (0)1904 500440
[email protected] www.fapas.com