+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Date post: 25-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: kiara
View: 58 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Prioritisation and Resource Allocation. Dr. Arun Ahluwalia Dr. Carol Chatt. In the next 5 years the NHS will have to set out more clearly what is – and what is not – available to patients free at the point of use on the NHS. Do you…. Strongly agree Tend to agree Tend to disagree - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
22
Prioritisation and Resource Allocation Dr. Arun Ahluwalia Dr. Carol Chatt
Transcript
Page 1: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Dr. Arun Ahluwalia Dr. Carol Chatt

Page 2: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

In the next 5 years the NHS will have to set out more clearly what is – and what is not –

available to patients free at the point of use on the NHS. Do you….

• Strongly agree• Tend to agree• Tend to disagree• Strongly disagree • Don’t know ?

Page 3: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation
Page 4: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Prioritisation

• We saw earlier that when demand exceeds available resources, choices have to be made.

• Choices implies priorities

Page 5: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation
Page 6: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation
Page 7: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

What is rationing?

• The allocation of resources, services or goods under some rational, emotional or political criterion

• Is this the same as prioritisation or resource allocation?

Page 8: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Implicit and Explicit Rationing

• Implicit rationing: care is limited, but neither the decisions, nor the bases for those decisions are clearly expressed.

• Explicit rationing: care is limited and the decisions are clear, as is the reasoning behind those decisions.

Page 9: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Rationing in the UK

“Rationing in Great Britain has been implicit…It is a silent conspiracy between a dense, obscurating bureaucracy, intentionally avoiding written policy for macroallocation (rationing), and a publicly unaccountable medical profession privately managing microallocation so as to conceal life and death decisions from patients”

(Crawshaw, 1990)

Page 10: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Explicit methods of rationing

1. League tables

2. Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA)

Page 11: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

1. League Tables

• Economic evaluations produce information on cost-effectiveness

• If using comparable outcomes (e.g. QALY) can ‘rank’ according to cost-effectiveness

• Can use resultant ‘league table’ to allocate resources to most cost-effective first

• E.g. The Oregon Plan

Page 12: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

The Oregon Plan• In 1989, the state of Oregon embarked on a controversial

experiment in the financing of health care. The state planned to add many uninsured people to the Medicaid program and to pay for this expansion by reducing the Medicaid benefit package — more people would be covered, but for fewer services.

• In 1991, Oregon ranked more than 700 diagnoses and treatments in order of importance. The state legislature then drew a line at item 587; treatments below the line would not be covered. Oregon had openly embraced the “R word”: rationing

• On February 1, 1994, the Oregon Health Plan, with its prioritized list, went into operation

• Thomas Bodenheimer The Oregon Health Plan — Lessons for the Nation N Engl J Med 1997; 337:651-656

Page 13: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

• In 1987, Coby Howard contracted acute lymphocytic leukemia and needed a bone marrow transplant. Earlier that year, the Oregon legislature had discontinued Medicaid coverage for organ transplantation

Page 14: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Problems with League Tables

• Limited data on cost-effectiveness• Studies to determine cost-effectiveness use

different methods – e.g. compare new treatment to placebo / current

treatment• Determining cut-off point• Needs constant updating

Page 15: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

2. PBMA

• combines both technical and political rationing methods

• Principles:– If £1 were to be made available that £1 should be

invested in an area in which the most benefit would be gained

– If £1 were to be disinvested that £1 should be taken away from an area where the least benefit would be lost.

Page 16: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Which programme would you invest in? Which programme would you disinvest in?

A B C D E0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Marginal benefit for next unit of resources

Current benefit

Marginal loss for removing unit of funding

Programmes

Bene

fits

Page 17: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Steps of PBMA1. Choose a set of meaningful programmes.2. Identify current activity and expenditure in those programmes.3. Think of improvements.4. Weigh up incremental costs and incremental benefits and prioritise a list.5. Consult widely.6. Decide on changes.7. Effect the changes.8. Evaluate progress.

Brambleby and Fordham, 2003. What is PBMA? Oxford University

Page 18: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

PBMA

• Main objective of PBMA is to reallocate resources so that benefits are maximised

• Successful implementation of PBMA requires resources to be shifted from the disinvestment list to the investment list

• But,– Disinvestment is difficult– PBMA is data hungry and time consuming– Difficult to obtain a representative advisory panel

Page 19: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Methods of rationing

• In your area of work, how do you deal with high demand?

Page 20: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Methods of rationing

• Delay– Create waiting lists

• Denial– Non-urgent or unsuitable cases are not done

Page 21: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

Possible methods for quantity rationing

• In groups of 4 choose your preferred 3 methods of quantity rationing and your least favourite 3 methods.

• (10 minutes)

Page 22: Prioritisation and Resource Allocation

In Summary,

• Prioritisation is inevitable in a resource limited health care system

• PBMA is attractive to decision-makers – Seems ‘rational’– Supported by DoH

• However, it is not easy– Increasing the input of various stakeholders may

shift the culture of the public / media to accept rationing


Recommended