+ All Categories
Home > Health & Medicine > Problem Solving

Problem Solving

Date post: 24-Jun-2015
Category:
Upload: mcneeljc86
View: 512 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
26
following childhood traumatic following childhood traumatic brain injury and its brain injury and its association with self- association with self- regulation and social and regulation and social and behavioral functioning behavioral functioning Kalaichelvi Ganesalingam, Keith Owen Kalaichelvi Ganesalingam, Keith Owen Yeates, Ann Sanson, and Vicki Anderson Yeates, Ann Sanson, and Vicki Anderson Presented by: Edward Harris, Jordan McNeely, & Keith Pelstring
Transcript
Page 1: Problem Solving

Social problem solving skills following Social problem solving skills following childhood traumatic brain injury and its childhood traumatic brain injury and its

association with self-regulation and association with self-regulation and

social and behavioral functioningsocial and behavioral functioning Kalaichelvi Ganesalingam, Keith Owen Yeates, Ann Kalaichelvi Ganesalingam, Keith Owen Yeates, Ann

Sanson, and Vicki AndersonSanson, and Vicki Anderson

Presented by:

Edward Harris, Jordan McNeely, & Keith Pelstring

Page 2: Problem Solving

IntroductionIntroduction

Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Results in a variety of adverse outcomesResults in a variety of adverse outcomes

Magnitude closely related to severity of injury Magnitude closely related to severity of injury (Yeates, 2000)(Yeates, 2000)

Moderate to severe TBI results in significant Moderate to severe TBI results in significant deficits in NP functioningdeficits in NP functioning

Poor regulatory skills, e.g. hyperactivity, inattention Poor regulatory skills, e.g. hyperactivity, inattention (Max, et al. 2004)(Max, et al. 2004)

Poor adaptive behaviors, interpersonal relations Poor adaptive behaviors, interpersonal relations (Yeates, et al. 2004)(Yeates, et al. 2004)

Lower social competency, higher levels of loneliness Lower social competency, higher levels of loneliness (Andrews, Rose & Johnson, 1998)(Andrews, Rose & Johnson, 1998)

Page 3: Problem Solving

Introduction cont.Introduction cont.

Research pays little attention to underlying Research pays little attention to underlying factorsfactors

Previous studies propose various NP deficits Previous studies propose various NP deficits as predictors (e.g. McGann, Werven & as predictors (e.g. McGann, Werven & Douglas, 1997)Douglas, 1997) Scores on traditional tests rarely strongly Scores on traditional tests rarely strongly

predictive among children with TBI predictive among children with TBI (Papero, et al. 1993)(Papero, et al. 1993)

Studies need to examine contribution of Studies need to examine contribution of social cognitive skills, NP factors, and social cognitive skills, NP factors, and interpersonal thinking skills to social interpersonal thinking skills to social behavioral functioning.behavioral functioning.

Page 4: Problem Solving

Introduction cont.Introduction cont.

Available studies suggest children with TBI Available studies suggest children with TBI demonstrate poorer social problem solving demonstrate poorer social problem solving skills.skills. Generate fewer solutions to hypothetical situationsGenerate fewer solutions to hypothetical situations Solutions provided are indirect, less positive, less Solutions provided are indirect, less positive, less

assertive (Warschausky, et al. 1997)assertive (Warschausky, et al. 1997) Children with severe TBI often respond with Children with severe TBI often respond with

immature strategies to solve social problemsimmature strategies to solve social problems Use less advanced reasoning to evaluate the Use less advanced reasoning to evaluate the

effectiveness of chosen strategies (Janusz, et al. effectiveness of chosen strategies (Janusz, et al. 2002)2002)

Page 5: Problem Solving

Introduction cont.Introduction cont. Crick & Dodge’s (1994) Crick & Dodge’s (1994)

Social Information Social Information Processing ModelProcessing Model

Six steps:Six steps:– Encoding situational and Encoding situational and

internal cues.internal cues.– Interpretation of cuesInterpretation of cues– Selecting or clarifying goalSelecting or clarifying goal– Generating or accessing Generating or accessing

possible responsespossible responses– Choosing a responseChoosing a response– Behavioral enactmentBehavioral enactment

Hypothesized that negative Hypothesized that negative behavior results from deficits behavior results from deficits in one or more stage (Dodge, in one or more stage (Dodge, 1986).1986).

Interpersonal Negotiation Interpersonal Negotiation Strategies ModelStrategies Model

Four Steps:Four Steps: Defining the problemDefining the problem Generating alternative Generating alternative

strategiesstrategies Selecting and implementing Selecting and implementing

a specific strategya specific strategy Evaluating the strategy’s Evaluating the strategy’s

outcomeoutcome Each skill can be implemented Each skill can be implemented

at four developmental levelsat four developmental levels Reflects children’s social Reflects children’s social

perspective taking ability perspective taking ability (Yeates, Schultz & Selman, (Yeates, Schultz & Selman, 1990, 1991)1990, 1991)

Page 6: Problem Solving

Introduction cont.Introduction cont.

Current study uses newly developed, semi-structured task Similar to SIP and INS models, but attends

specifically to step 5 of SIP and step 3 of INS Less time consuming to administer and easier to

score Overall Goal: “…to examine the impact of

childhood TBI on social problem solving skills… and to determine whether social problem solving is predicted by measures of self regulation.”

Page 7: Problem Solving

HypothesisHypothesis Children with moderate to severe TBI Children with moderate to severe TBI

would display poorer social problem would display poorer social problem solving skills.solving skills.

Regardless of group, self regulation Regardless of group, self regulation would account for significant would account for significant variance in social problem solving.variance in social problem solving.

Social problem solving would account Social problem solving would account for significant variance in social and for significant variance in social and behavioral functioning.behavioral functioning.

Page 8: Problem Solving

MethodMethod

SubjectsSubjects Experimental GroupExperimental Group

60 children with TBI’s were recruited from 3 60 children with TBI’s were recruited from 3 hospitals around Australiahospitals around Australia

5 more children with TBI’s were recruited 5 more children with TBI’s were recruited form primary schools in New Zealandform primary schools in New Zealand

Control groupControl group 5 children from Australia and 60 children 5 children from Australia and 60 children

from New Zealand without TBI’s were from New Zealand without TBI’s were recruited the control subject matched the recruited the control subject matched the experimental group for age and genderexperimental group for age and gender

Page 9: Problem Solving

Method cont.Method cont. Subjects cont.Subjects cont.

All subjects were ages 6-11All subjects were ages 6-11 All subjects were attending a mainstream primary schoolAll subjects were attending a mainstream primary school 95% of subjects were Caucasian 95% of subjects were Caucasian Remaining 5% were of Asian, Polynesian, or Middle-Remaining 5% were of Asian, Polynesian, or Middle-

Eastern decentEastern decent All subjects wrote and spoke English as their first All subjects wrote and spoke English as their first

languagelanguage All subjects with severe TBI’s (n=32) had intracranial All subjects with severe TBI’s (n=32) had intracranial

abnormalities on CT and/or MRI scans abnormalities on CT and/or MRI scans Of the subjects with moderate TBI’s (n=33) 73% had Of the subjects with moderate TBI’s (n=33) 73% had

intracranial abnormalities on CT and/or MRI scansintracranial abnormalities on CT and/or MRI scans Socio-economic status varied widely based on maternal Socio-economic status varied widely based on maternal

education and occupationeducation and occupation

Page 10: Problem Solving

Method cont.Method cont. Subjects cont.Subjects cont.

Diagnosis criteria Diagnosis criteria TBI’s had to be documented and accidentalTBI’s had to be documented and accidental It had been 2-5 years from TBI incident It had been 2-5 years from TBI incident Severe TBI was defined as a score of 8 or less on the Severe TBI was defined as a score of 8 or less on the

Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Moderate TBI was defined as a GCS score of 9-12Moderate TBI was defined as a GCS score of 9-12 Also, a TBI with a GCS score of 13-15 was defined as Also, a TBI with a GCS score of 13-15 was defined as

moderate if it was accompanied by:moderate if it was accompanied by: Skull fractureSkull fracture Intracranial lesionIntracranial lesion diffuse cerebral swelling on routine clinical imagingdiffuse cerebral swelling on routine clinical imaging Post-traumatic neurological abnormality Post-traumatic neurological abnormality Loss of consciousness for longer that 15 minutesLoss of consciousness for longer that 15 minutes

Page 11: Problem Solving

Method cont.Method cont.

Measures – Social Problem-Solving Measures – Social Problem-Solving This was assessed by presenting 8 hypothetical This was assessed by presenting 8 hypothetical

situations involving social problems situations involving social problems The interviewer read the situation from a script while the The interviewer read the situation from a script while the

child followed along with a three picture cartoon child followed along with a three picture cartoon depicting the situationdepicting the situation

After the interviewer had finished telling the story they After the interviewer had finished telling the story they would ask the child “What would you do in this would ask the child “What would you do in this situation.” situation.”

Response were coded as assertive, aggressive, avoidant, Response were coded as assertive, aggressive, avoidant, or irrelevant/no response or irrelevant/no response

Assertive responses were the ones that were considered Assertive responses were the ones that were considered relevant and pro-socialrelevant and pro-social

All interviews were audio taped and transcribed All interviews were audio taped and transcribed To insure reliability 30% of subjects responses were To insure reliability 30% of subjects responses were

coded by an independent rater coded by an independent rater

Page 12: Problem Solving

Method cont.Method cont.

Measures – Social Problem-SolvingMeasures – Social Problem-SolvingYou are at a party. An adult at the party stars to give the children bags You are at a party. An adult at the party stars to give the children bags

with all sorts of goodies inside, while she is doing this the phone rings. with all sorts of goodies inside, while she is doing this the phone rings. She goes to answer the phone without giving you a bag and no one She goes to answer the phone without giving you a bag and no one

there seems to care that you are the only child without a bag. there seems to care that you are the only child without a bag.

Page 13: Problem Solving

Method cont.Method cont.Measures – Self-regulating tasksMeasures – Self-regulating tasks

The Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT; Kagan, 1966) The Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT; Kagan, 1966) This was used to assess cognitive impulsivityThis was used to assess cognitive impulsivity Children are presented with a figure and asked to find identical Children are presented with a figure and asked to find identical

matches to this figure in and array of similar distractersmatches to this figure in and array of similar distracters Response errors and response latency were recordedResponse errors and response latency were recorded On this test high scores indicate poor self-regulationOn this test high scores indicate poor self-regulation

10 Minute Delay of Gratification Task (DGT; Mischel & Ebbesen, 10 Minute Delay of Gratification Task (DGT; Mischel & Ebbesen, 1970)1970)

This was used to assess behavioral self-regulationThis was used to assess behavioral self-regulation Child was put in a room with a bell on a table, one piece of candy was Child was put in a room with a bell on a table, one piece of candy was

placed in front of the bell and two pieces of candy were placed behind placed in front of the bell and two pieces of candy were placed behind the bell.the bell.

The experimenter prepared to leave and the child was told that if they The experimenter prepared to leave and the child was told that if they waited for the experimenter to return they would receive 2 pieces of waited for the experimenter to return they would receive 2 pieces of candy but if they rang the bell to summon the experimenter back into candy but if they rang the bell to summon the experimenter back into the room they would only receive one piece of candy.the room they would only receive one piece of candy.

Children were videotaped Children were videotaped Distraction strategies and time until gratification were recorded Distraction strategies and time until gratification were recorded

Page 14: Problem Solving

Method cont.Method cont.

Measures – Self-regulating tasksMeasures – Self-regulating tasks

Test of Everyday Attention for Children Test of Everyday Attention for Children (TEA-Ch; Manly, Robertson, (TEA-Ch; Manly, Robertson, Anderson, & Nimmo-Smith, 1999) Anderson, & Nimmo-Smith, 1999) Three of the TEA-Ch subscales were Three of the TEA-Ch subscales were

employed in this study to look at various employed in this study to look at various aspects of cognitive self-regulation. aspects of cognitive self-regulation. These are sky search, score, and These are sky search, score, and opposite worlds. opposite worlds.

Page 15: Problem Solving

Method cont.Method cont.Measures – Self-regulating tasksMeasures – Self-regulating tasks

TEA-ChTEA-Ch Sky Search assessed focused attentionSky Search assessed focused attention

Children asked to circle spaceships on a paper with and without Children asked to circle spaceships on a paper with and without distractersdistracters

Non-distracter task time was subtracted from distracter task time to Non-distracter task time was subtracted from distracter task time to control for motor speedcontrol for motor speed

Score test assessed unassisted sustained attentionScore test assessed unassisted sustained attention Children were asked to count the number of laser beam sounds in a set Children were asked to count the number of laser beam sounds in a set There were 10 sets that lasted 30-40 seconds each and there were 10-There were 10 sets that lasted 30-40 seconds each and there were 10-

20 sounds per set20 sounds per set Opposite Worlds assessed control and suppression of automatic Opposite Worlds assessed control and suppression of automatic

verbal responseverbal response Child was asked to follow a path on a page that periodically had the Child was asked to follow a path on a page that periodically had the

numerals 1 and 2numerals 1 and 2 On the “same world” trial the child was ask to say “one” upon seeing 1 On the “same world” trial the child was ask to say “one” upon seeing 1

and “two” upon seeing 2and “two” upon seeing 2 On the “opposite world” trail the child was ask to say “two” upon On the “opposite world” trail the child was ask to say “two” upon

seeing 1 and “one” upon seeing 2seeing 1 and “one” upon seeing 2 Only the “opposite world” trail data was used in this studyOnly the “opposite world” trail data was used in this study

Page 16: Problem Solving

Method cont.Method cont.Measures – Social and behavioral functioning Measures – Social and behavioral functioning

Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI; Eyberg & Robinson, Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI; Eyberg & Robinson, 1983)1983) This assesses the intensity of a variety of behavior problem This assesses the intensity of a variety of behavior problem

children may display at homechildren may display at home This measure was parent ratedThis measure was parent rated High scores reflect poor functioningHigh scores reflect poor functioning

Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory – Revised (SESBI-R; Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory – Revised (SESBI-R; Funderburk & Eyberg, 1989)Funderburk & Eyberg, 1989) This assesses the intensity of a variety of behavior problem This assesses the intensity of a variety of behavior problem

children may display at schoolchildren may display at school This measure was teacher rated This measure was teacher rated High scores reflect poor functioningHigh scores reflect poor functioning

Social Skills Rating System (SSRS; Gresham & Elliot, 1990)Social Skills Rating System (SSRS; Gresham & Elliot, 1990) This assesses behaviors that allow children to interact effectivelyThis assesses behaviors that allow children to interact effectively This measure was rated by parents and teachersThis measure was rated by parents and teachers High scores reflect better functioning High scores reflect better functioning

Page 17: Problem Solving

Method cont.Method cont.

Measures – Social and behavioral functioningMeasures – Social and behavioral functioning Emotion Regulation Checklist (ERC; Shields Emotion Regulation Checklist (ERC; Shields

& Cicchetti, 1998)& Cicchetti, 1998) Emotion regulation Emotion regulation

Assesses empathy and emotional awarenessAssesses empathy and emotional awareness High scores reflect better functioningHigh scores reflect better functioning

Lability/negativity Lability/negativity Assesses emotional flexibility and negative affectAssesses emotional flexibility and negative affect High scores reflect poor functioningHigh scores reflect poor functioning

Both of these subscales were parent ratedBoth of these subscales were parent rated

Page 18: Problem Solving

Data Analysis Data Analysis

An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was ran An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was ran between group membership and response between group membership and response to social problem solving taskto social problem solving task

Many correlations were ran between Many correlations were ran between responses, measures of self-regulation, and responses, measures of self-regulation, and parent and teacher rated social and parent and teacher rated social and behavioral functioningbehavioral functioning

Also hierarchal regression analyses were Also hierarchal regression analyses were conducted to determine self-regulation’s conducted to determine self-regulation’s significance as determinants for social significance as determinants for social problem solving and social and behavioral problem solving and social and behavioral outcomesoutcomes

Page 19: Problem Solving

ResultsResultsSocial problem solving taskSocial problem solving task

Children with a TBI gave twice as many avoidant and aggressive Children with a TBI gave twice as many avoidant and aggressive responses, and half as many assertive responses as the controlsresponses, and half as many assertive responses as the controls

Also they were almost four times more likely to give an Also they were almost four times more likely to give an irrelevant/no response answerirrelevant/no response answer

Page 20: Problem Solving

Results cont.Results cont. A significant relationship was found between self regulation and A significant relationship was found between self regulation and

problem solving response but only in experimental groupproblem solving response but only in experimental group Higher level of self regulation predicted more assertive and Higher level of self regulation predicted more assertive and

fewer aggressive solutionsfewer aggressive solutions

Page 21: Problem Solving

Results cont.Results cont. Significant relationships were found between Significant relationships were found between

parent and teacher rated social and behavioral parent and teacher rated social and behavioral functioning and aggressive or assertive solutionsfunctioning and aggressive or assertive solutions

Page 22: Problem Solving

DiscussionDiscussion

Results supported the hypothesis Results supported the hypothesis that children with TBI displayed that children with TBI displayed poorer social problem solving skills poorer social problem solving skills than uninjured children.than uninjured children. More avoidant, aggressiveMore avoidant, aggressive Consistent with previous researchConsistent with previous research

Page 23: Problem Solving

Self RegulationSelf Regulation

Taken collectively, better performance Taken collectively, better performance on self regulation measurements on self regulation measurements predicted more pro-social solutions.predicted more pro-social solutions. No individual measure showed significant No individual measure showed significant

variancevariance Measures used were intercorrelatedMeasures used were intercorrelated Partly consistent with previous research Partly consistent with previous research

that failed to find significant relationships that failed to find significant relationships between neuropsychological tests and between neuropsychological tests and social behaviorsocial behavior

Page 24: Problem Solving

Social Problem-SolvingSocial Problem-Solving

Measured skills accounted for Measured skills accounted for significant variance in behavioral significant variance in behavioral functioningfunctioning Aggressive solutions -- poorer functioningAggressive solutions -- poorer functioning Assertive solutions -- better functioningAssertive solutions -- better functioning *Avoidant solutions were not predictive of *Avoidant solutions were not predictive of

behavioral functioning*behavioral functioning* -Measures in this study were more focused -Measures in this study were more focused

on externalized behaviors rather than on externalized behaviors rather than internalized onesinternalized ones

Page 25: Problem Solving

Confounds and ShortcomingsConfounds and Shortcomings

Children without TBI did not have the Children without TBI did not have the stressful experience of a hospital stressful experience of a hospital stay. Children with non-cranial stay. Children with non-cranial orthopedic injuries would have made orthopedic injuries would have made better controls.better controls.

Most children from the TBI sample Most children from the TBI sample were from Australia, while the non-were from Australia, while the non-TBI sample were predominantly from TBI sample were predominantly from New Zealand.New Zealand.

Page 26: Problem Solving

Confounds and ShortcomingsConfounds and Shortcomings

Linguistic abilities were not assessedLinguistic abilities were not assessed Some differences between the samples Some differences between the samples

may have been attributable to ability to may have been attributable to ability to articulate.articulate.

Authors feel that controlling for Authors feel that controlling for language deficits should be addressed in language deficits should be addressed in future research.future research.


Recommended