+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Problem/Challenge

Problem/Challenge

Date post: 13-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: tevin
View: 15 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Problem/Challenge. hematite in cosmetics. Naturally occurring, incidental, and manufactured NPs are of different sizes and nanomorphologies. Which are more bioactive? Why? How NPs respond to facing biosystem?. Problem/Challenge. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
11
Problem/Challenge hematite in cosmetics Naturally occurring, incidental, and manufactured NPs are of different sizes and nanomorphologies. Which are more bioactive? Why? How NPs respond to facing biosystem?
Transcript
Page 1: Problem/Challenge

Problem/Challenge

hematite in cosmetics

• Naturally occurring, incidental, and manufactured NPs are of different sizes and nanomorphologies.

• Which are more bioactive? Why? • How NPs respond to facing biosystem?

Page 2: Problem/Challenge

Problem/Challenge

Nel, Madler, Velegol, Xia, Hoek, Somasundaran, Klaessig, Castranova, Thompson Nature Mat. 8, 2009, 543

Page 3: Problem/Challenge

‘Appropriate’ Characterization of NP, protein, system

In situ probing of

• anisotropy in acid-base properties of adsorption sites on metal oxide nanoparticles (NP) in contact with water =LOCAL PROPERTIES IN SITU (!)

• molecular structure and binding mode of adsorbed species

Why This Project is Unique?

Interpretation of Data Using Molecular Modeling

Page 4: Problem/Challenge

Molecular Modeling: Chrysotile (Mg3Si2O5(OH)4) – Human Serum Albumin

Domains of HSA Modeled Domains of HSA

•Modification of HSA secondary structure•Loss of α-helix structure •Amino acid monolayer on chrysotile surface

Artali et. al., J. R. Soc. Interface 2008, 5, 273Latin: albus = white

Page 5: Problem/Challenge

Objective of Initial Part of Project

To develop

• in situ probe-molecule spectroscopic method to compare acid-base properties of different adsorption sites on basic metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs)

Page 6: Problem/Challenge

H7 H38H20

H200 H600

H120

Samples: Hematite and Ferrihydrite NPs

Hematite

2-Line Ferrihydrite

H45

7, 20, 38, 45, and 120 nm hematite was synthesized by forced hydrolysis; 200 nm hematite and 2-line ferrihydrite – commercial;

phase purity was confirmed by XRD

Page 7: Problem/Challenge

Effect of Nanomorphology on Average Acid-Base Properties of Hematite NPs

Isoelectric point (IEP) by electrokinetic measurements;

Point of Zero Charge (PZC) – by salt titration

Macroscopic basicity has maximum at ~40nmIt averages acid-base properties of different surface sites

Macroscopic basicity has maximum at ~40nmIt averages acid-base properties of different surface sites

0 50 100 150 200

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

9.0

9.5

PZ

C, I

EP

NP Size, nm

PZC IEP

Page 8: Problem/Challenge

1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800

FH, 2nm

7nm

20 nm

38 nm

45 nm

120 nm

200 nm

Wavenumber, cm-1

H2O

Abs

orba

nce,

AU

3s

13as

Adsorption of carbonate vs hematite NPs size/morphology

two-magnons abs-n

in situ FTIR HATR spectra NPs at pH of 5.6

CO32- adsorption is SPECIFIC to NP size

FH: one type of adsorbed CO32-

7-45 nm: two types of CO32-

120 nm: HCO3- dominates

200 nm: no adsorption

3O–C–OFe-OH, 2Fe-O

I I I

IIII

II

IIIIII

in situ FTIR HATR spectra NPs at pH of 5.6

Page 9: Problem/Challenge

1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800

FH, 2nm

7nm

20 nm

38 nm

45 nm

120 nm

200 nm

Wavenumber, cm-1

H2O

Abs

orba

nce,

AU

inner-sphere monodentate mononuclear (ISMM)

II

I

I

IIIIII

inner-sphere bidentate binuclear (ISBB)II

Selective adsorption of CO32-: basicity of terminal hydroxyls

DFT molecular modeling => structure of

adsorbed complexes

protonatedinner-sphere monodentate

mononuclear (ISMM-H)

IIIIII

III

Page 10: Problem/Challenge

• Carbonate adsorption is SPECIFIC for NP size• Selectivity can be correlated with size induced

changes in surface structure and basicity of terminal hydroxyls

• Heterogeneity in acid-base surface properties of NPs can be characterized using carbonate as a probe molecule

• These findings are key to unraveling complex interactions with polypeptides and proteins

Conclusions

Page 11: Problem/Challenge

Acknowledgements

Work was supported by NSF grant #0925232


Recommended