PROPERTIES OF WEAK LAYERS COMPOSED OF PRECIPITATION PARTICLES IN AND NEAR AVALANCHE STARTING ZONES IN JAPAN
Shinji Ikeda and Tomoyuki Noro
Public Works Research Institute, Snow Avalanche and Landslide Research Center
ABSTRACT: To gain further insight into the properties of weak layers composed of precipitation particles(PP weak layer), we analyzed 18 measurement datasets. All analyzed data were collected from avalanche fracture lines or flat sites near avalanche starting zones; these data correspond to notable PP weak layer-related avalanche activities observed in Japan. PP weak layers were found at depths of 6–117 cm, and these layers were 2–22-cm thick. At all study sites, the PP weak layers were composed of large (diameter: 1.0–2.5 mm) rime-less stellar or dendrite planar crystals. The density of the observed layers ranged between 63 and 190 kgm-3. The shear frame index–density relationship of the studied layers resembled that observed by Jamieson and Johnston (2001) rather than observed by Yamanoi and Endo (2002) and Perla et al. (1982). Further analysis of larger datasets obtained from various regions with snow climate is necessary of the properties of weak layers. However, our results suggest that the identification of the types of precipitation particles present in the snowpack under consideration is important for snow stability evaluation and avalanche forecast when weak layers composed of precipitation particles are involved. 1. INTRODUCTION The properties of weak layer are an important factor for stability analysis of snowpack and avalanche prediction. However, most of existing studies about property of weak layers focused on persistent weak layers (Jamieson,1995) composed of facetted crystals, surface hoar and depth hoar, which maintain weakness for a long period (ex. Akitaya, 1974; Fukuzawa and Akitaya, 1993; Birkeland, 1998; Hachikubo and Akitaya, 1998). It is known that relatively large and little rimed precipitation particles form typical non-persistent weak layers. For such weak layers composed of precipitation particles (hereafter: PP weak layer), an approach to estimate their stabilities using a physically based model (with empirical parameterizations) is developed (Endo, 1991, Conway and Wilbour, 1999) as a support tool for avalanche forecasting (hereafter: SNOSS = SNOw Slope Stability model). SNOSS estimate a stability index which is a ratio of the shear strength of weak layers and the shear stress produced by overburden of snow on the weak layers for given depth and time as an output. The shear strength of *Corresponding and presenting author: Ikeda H. 2-6-8, Nishiki-cho, Myoko-City, Niigata-Pref, 944-0051, Japan Phone: +81-255-72-4131 Fax: +81-255-72-9629 e-mail: [email protected]
weak layers is estimated by using empirical equation of the relation of snow density and shear strength, and snow density is estimated from initial density, overburden stress and temperature and compactive viscosity. For SNOSS, even the same situation may result in very different outputs of stability when using different empirical equation of the relation of snow density and shear strength and compactive viscosity. It have been pointed out that the necessity of examination of applicability of the properties of PP weak layer in conjunction with the climatic conditions by some studies (ex. Broun, et al, 2008, Hirashima, et al., 2008, Marshall et al., 2008). Hirashima, et al. (2008) has shown that the empirical equations of relationship between snow density and shear strength by Jamieson and Johnston (2001), which were developed using the observation data in Canada, tend to over-estimate the instability compared to the empirical equations by Yamanoi and Endo (2002), which were developed using the observation data in Japan, in their study on the snowpack stability analysis of Japanese snow using the SNOWPACK model. The differences in crystal types are considered to give a major influence on the properties of weak layers, such as the relationships between density and shear strength and compressive viscosity. Casson et al. (2008) attempt to be clear the properties for each type of precipitation particles by field measurement and pointed out importance of identification of each crystal types of fallen snow for SNOSS. Because the crystal type of precipitation particles depend not on the climate but on the weather
Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska
586
conditions when it fall, and same types of snow crystals may fall in regions whose climate differ largely each other, even though the frequencies are different. Therefore, if we only factor the climate for the properties of PP weak layers, we may miss-estimate the instability of snowpack. On the other hand, most of existing studies on PP weak layers depend on the data observed at the study plots which are located on lowland and are at a distance from the avalanche start zone and those data are collected regardless of avalanche occurrence (Perla et al., 1982; Yamanoi and Endo, 2002; Brown and Jamieson, 2008; and Casson et al., 2008). Therefore, it is hard to say these studies had grasped the properties of PP weak layers that actually causing the avalanche. This study aims to clarify the properties of PP weak layers that actually caused avalanches in Japan where has quite different climatic condition from North America and Europe. To this end, data was collected and analyzed on the weak layers of precipitation particles, which were observed on or near the starting zones of avalanches under the obvious avalanche cycles rerated with PP weak layers in Japan. 2. METHODS We collected 18 cases of observations of PP weak layers that actually caused avalanches in Japan. 12 cases of observations were performed by author. One case of them was observed at fracture line of avalanche and 11 cases were observed near the avalanche starting zone when obvious avalanche cycles rerated with PP weak layer had been reported on the Snow bulletin board (Degawa et al., 2008). The Snow bulletin board is a web-based information exchange system operated by Japan Avalanche Network (JAN) to contribute to back country avalanche safety. The registered members who provide data are mountain guides, patrols and experienced recreational back country users and they have received training for observing and reporting data on avalanche activities, snowpack conditions and weather conditions in conformity with the Observation Guidelines and Recording Standards for Weather, Snowpack and Avalanches (JAN, 2009) which is drawn up based on Observation Guidelines and Recording Standards for Weather, Snowpack and Avalanches drawn up by Canadian Avalanche Association: OGRS (CAA, 2007). Snow pit observations were performed in accordance with both of OGRS (JAN, 2009) and OGRS (CAA, 2007). The observation items are as follow.
Layer structure: visually observed Type of snow: visually observed Particle diameter: measured with a grading
gauge with 1, 2 and 3 mm grids Hardness: determined by the hand test that
classifies hardness into four classifications of F, 4f, 1f, P, K and I
Density: average of three samplings collected by a cubic density sampler (height: 3 cm and volume:100 cm3) When thickness of the target layer is less than 3 cm, the snow of the upper layer is sampled together. Then, the snow of upper layer is sampled exclusively. The density of the target layer is calculated according to the following equation. ρw={3ρwu - (3-tw) ρu}/tw (1) ρw: density of weak snow layer ρwu: density of weak snow layer ρu: density of upper layer tw: thickness of weak snow layer ρu: density of upper layer
Shear strength of the weak layer: shear strength index is measured using a shear frame of 250 cm2; More than 10 measurements were taken for one sample. The average of measurements were used.
The weak layer was identified by visual observation of the boundary between remaining slab and sliding surface, when observation is performed at fracture line. In the other observations, the layers that may correspond to the weak layers that were reported on the Snow bulletin board were identified by confirming to the layer structures (the weak layer locations were specified relative to the index layers, such as crust layers). Father, One case and five cases were obtained from existing research reports and from the Snow Profile Information Network (SPIN) which is a web-based snow profile data base operated by JAN (Degawa et al., 2008), respectively. Some of the observation items may lack on those observations stated above. 3. RESULTS Table 1 shows observation results of 18 cases of PP weak layers that actually rerated avalanche activities in Japan and fig. 1 shows picture of examples of observed crystals. 7 cases are observed at avalanche fracture line and 10 cases are observed near avalanche starting zone under the obvious avalanche cycles rerated with PP weak layer.
Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska
587
Observaand the ranged wand 117 thicknesswhich ha
Fig. 2. RSFI of ob
No.
1 Goryu2 Hiyodo3 Kuroh4 Mitaha5 Noriku6 Noriku7 Tatesi8 Tugaik9 Tugaik
10 Tugaik11 Noriku12 Noriku13 Tatesi14 Sigako15 Mume16 Hakub17 Nasud18 Kurum
L
ation values thickness o
widely, they cm deep fro
ses vary fromave detailed r
Relationship bserved PP w
Gray hatch
Location andElevation (m)
dake 1800orimine 1900imeyama 1000arayama 2100urakougen 2000urakougen 1800 inakogen 1800kekogen 1600kekogen 1600kekogen 1600urakougen 2000urakougen 1800 inakogen 2200ougen 1800izawa 1900
banorikuradake 21dake 1550mayama 1900
Fig. Left: Norikura
of both theof observed
were locateom the snow m 2 to 22 cmrecord of cry
between theweak layers
hing indicates
Observeddate
(dd/mm/yy)4/10/064/9/062/1/082/2/082/2/082/2/082/2/082/4/082/4/082/4/08
1/24/091/24/091/25/091/25/091/26/09
50 3/7/094/4/09
3/12/11
1. Example oa highland No
e location (dd PP weak ed at betwesurface and
m. All of 16 cstal type and
e density an
Table
s that the obs
)Trigger
Incline(°)
6 Natural 426 Human 408 - -8 Human 358 - -8 - -8 - -8 - -8 - -8 - -9 - -9 - -9 - -9 - -9 Human 409 Human 429 Human 521 Natural 28
of observed so. 6; middle:
depth) layer
een 6 d their cases d
d the
gradiaDeobs63 resrelaJohresEnver(20ranFiglay(BLfigulaylaythasm
1. Collected
servation wa
depth(cm)
Grain sha
2 60 PPsd/DFd0 47 PP/DF
117 PPsd/DFd5 36 PPsd/DF
11 PPsd/FCs13 PPsd13 PPsd/FCs21 PPsd32 PPsd56 PPsd/DFd20 PPsd19 PPsd11 PPsd/FCs6 PPsd/FCs
0 72 PPsd/DFd2 67 PP/DF2 49 PP8 48 PP
snow crystalsTsugaike hig
ain size wereameter of 1.0 ensity and SFserved snow
and 190 spectively. Thationship of hnston (2001sembled thatdo (2002) anry weaker th002) and Penge. g. 3 shows dyer (WL) and L) the PP wure 3 may yers tend to hyers of aboveat compactiv
maller than it o
data
s performed
apeSize ofcrystals(mm)
dc 1.0-2.0-
dc 1.0-2.02.0
sf 1.5-2.01.5-2.5
sf 1.5-2.01.5-2.51.5-2.0
dc 1.0-2.01.5-2.51.0-2.0
sf 1.0-2.5sf 1.5-2.5dc 1.0-2.5
2.0-
1.0-2.0
s (the backgrghland No. 8
e dendrite cryto 2.5 mm a
FI of 14 casew density andkgm-3 and he shear framthe measure
1) rather thant observed nd Perla et aan reported rla et al. (19
difference of of the layers
weak layer. be seen thahave lower d
e or below it ave viscosity of layers abo
at avalanche
Hardness(hand)
Thikof l
(4FF4FFFFFFF4FFFFF4F4F-4F
round is 3 mm; Right: Mum
ystals with reland almost rimes were mead SFI range0.11 and
me index–dened 14 PP wn observed bby Jamiesonl. (1982) (Figby Yamanoi
982) with sam
f densities ofs above (LA) The results at the obsedensity than and these daof PP wea
ove and below
e fracture line
knessayerscm)
SFI(KPa)
De(Kg
5 -22 -3 0.585 -5 0.372 0.273 0.313 0.114 0.194 0.737 -5 -5 -4 -2 0.81
14 -6 0.92
17 -
m grid) meizawa No.
lative largeme free. sured. The
ed between 0.92 kPa, nsity
weak layers by Yamanoi n and and g. 2). It was i and Endo me density
f PP weak and below plotted in
rved weak that of the
ata suggest ak layer is w.
e.
ensitygm-3)
Datasource
- JAN- JAN149 author
- JAN157 author134 author179 author63 author69 author
173 author87 author92 author
156 author133 author165 author
- JAN190 NIED
- JAN
15
Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska
588
Fig. 3. Dand of thlayer LAthe weak Lthe weak 4. DISC Our resuJapan occurrendensity tmeasureWe consequationand sheJamiesoby YamadifferencYamanoselectionJohnstonweak obweak laysame dobvious with quiCanada.On the reportedfor reprtends torelativelyconsidersnowpacthe emformulatetheir repmake re
Difference ofhe layers ab
A-WL: differk layer and thB-WL: differk layer and th
CUSSION AN
ults suggest which con
nce have simto those of thed by Jamiessider that thens of relationear strength n and Johnsanoi and Ence of methodi and Endo
n of PP layn (2001) sebviously. Theyers which hadensity with
avalanche cite different other hand that SNOSS
roducing theo become uny low when sr that low ck becomes
mpirical equed by Jamies
port also indilatively stron
f densities obove and be
rence in the he layer abovrence in the he layer belo
ND CONCLUS
that the PPntribute to milar shear sthe PP weak son and Johne difference bnship betwe of PP lay
ston (2001) ando (2002) id of sample o (2002) myers whereaelect PP layese results ave similar sh
Canada iscycles even
climate fro
Brown and S has relativee situation nstable whilenowpack becaccuracy ostable were
uations of son and Johnicates that thnger layers w
of PP weak low the PP
density betwve it
density betwow it
SION
P weak layethe avala
trength with slayers in Ca
nston (2001).between empeen snow deyer measurend it of meass brought byselection, na
measured wias Jamiesonyers which indicate tha
hear strengths formed u
in Japan wom a climat
Jamieson (2ely high accuwhen snow
e the accuracomes stable
of SNOSS wbrought by shear stre
nston (2001)he crystals wwith same de
layer weak
ween
ween
ers in anche same
anada
pirical ensity ed by sured y the amely ithout and were
at PP h with under where te of
2008) uracy
wpack acy is e. We when using ength ), and which ensity
areIn equshothewitideOuwhto othThshesughavColaywildWeperlayBestuto diffof dimpassfore REAki
Bir
Bro
Ca
Co
Ca
e often formeconclusion, uations of should not be se subject areh the crysta
entified by sour results alsich contributhave a low
her layers cois may be aear strengthggest that thve stronger
onsequently, yer should bed snow avalae propose nrsistent wea
yer." cause the n
udy is not larcollect mor
ferent climatedata in this sportance of sessing the secasting an a
EFERENCESitaya, E. (197Inst. Low Te
rkeland, K. Wprocesses weak layersthe mountai193–199, 19
own, C., Jamand SnowpPersistant W2008 InternSeptember 2
anadian AObservationStandards Avalanches.Revelstoke,
onway, H., Cslope stabiScience and
asson, J., SEvaluating tNew Snow Approach Proceedings
ed even in Cawhen using
hear strengthset in accordaea, but shouldal types of me kind of m
so suggestedte to obviouser compressomposed of attributed toh with same weakness
r persistencavalanches
e clearly cateanches or stot to call suk layer" but
number of drge enough, re data frome zones. De
study, the resfocusing on stability of Pavalanche.
S 74) Studies o
emp. Sci. A26W., Terminoassociated
s of near-surfn snowpack,
998. mieson, B., pack Stabil
Weak Layersnational Sno21-27, 2008.
Avalanche n Guideline
for Weath. Canadian ACanada. . Wilbour, 19lity during sd TechnologyStoelinga, Mthe Importan
Instability: Using th
s Whistler 20
anada. SNOSS, the
h of the PP wance with thed be set in a
precipitationmeasures. d that PP ws avalanche sive viscosity
precipitationo the relativeme density
of such PP e than othcaused by a
egorized apatorm snow auch weak la
"semi-persis
data collectefuture study
m different espite the smsult clearly in snow cryst
PP weak laye
on depth hoa6, 1–67. ology and prwith the foface faceted , Arct. Alp. R
2008. Sheality Trends
s. Proceedingow Science Association
es and her, SnowpAvalanche A
999. Evolutiostorms. Coldy. 30, 67-77. ., Locatelli,
nce of Crystaa Strength
he SNOSS008 Internati
e empirical weak layer e climate of accordance n particles
weak layers cycle tend
y than the n particles. ely weaker
and may weak layer
her layers. a PP weak art from the avalanches. ayers "non-stent weak
ed for this y is needed
regions in mall sample
dicates the al type for ers and for
ar. Contrib.
redominant rmation of crystals in
Res., 30(2),
ar Strength in Non-
gs Whistler Workshop
n, 2007. Recording
pack and Association,
on of snow d Regions
J., 2008. al-Type on vs. Stress
S Model. onal Snow
Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska
589
Science Workshop September 21-27, 2008. Degawa, A., Hirota, Y. 2008. Avalanche Education
Based on the Information-Sharing Concept at Japan Avalanche Network. Proceedings Whistler 2008 International Snow Science Workshop September 21-27, 2008.
Endo, Y., 1991. Time variation of stability index in new snow on slopes, in Proceedings of the Japan-U.S. Workshop on Snow Avalanche, Landslide, Debris Flow Prediction and Control, 30 September–2 October 1991, Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 85–94, Natl. Res. Inst. for Earth Sci. and Disaster Prev., Sci. and Technol. Agency, Tsukuba, Japan, 1991.
Fukuzawa, T., and E. Akitaya, Depth-hoar crystal growth in the surface layer under high temperature gradient, Ann. Glaciol., 18, 39–45, 1993.
Jamieson, J.B., 1995. Avalanche prediction for persistent snow slabs. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Canada.
Jamieson, J.B. and C.D. Johnston, 2001. Evaluation of the shear frame test for weak snowpack layers. Annals of Glaciology. 32, 59-69.
Japan Avalanche Network, 2009. Observation Guidelines and Recording Standards for Weather, Snowpack and Avalanches. Japan Avalanche Network, Yokohama, Japan.
Hachikubo, A., Numerical modelling of sublimation on snow and comparison with field measurements, Ann. Glaciol., 32, 27–32, 2001.
Hirashima, H., Nishimura, K., Yamaguchi, S., Sato, A., and Lehning, M., 2008. Avalanche forecasting in a heavy snowfall area using the snowpack model. Cold Regions Science Technology 51, 191-203.
Marshall, H.P., Landry, C., Hale, S., Roberts, J., Conway, H., 2008. Snow Slope Stability Modeling of Direct-Action Avalanches in a Continental Climate: Red Mountain Pass, Colorado. Proceedings Whistler 2008 International Snow Science Workshop September 21-27, 2008.
Perla, R., T.M.H. Beck, T.T. Cheng, 1982. The shear strength index of alpine snow. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 6, 11-20.
Yamanoi, K., Endo, Y., 2002. Dependence of shear strength of snow cover on density and water content. Seppyo. 64 (4), 443–451 (in Japanese with English Abstruct).
Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska
590