+ All Categories
Home > Documents > PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit...

PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit...

Date post: 02-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: chad-hancock
View: 227 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
43
PROCESS COSTING
Transcript
Page 1: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

PROCESS COSTING

Page 2: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

PROCESS COSTING

1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources.

2.Process costing does not assign costs to each unit of output because each unit is identical. Instead, average unit costs are computed.

Page 3: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Process Costing

Outcomes• Allocate the proceeds from the sales of scrap to the

correct accounts• Account for transfers from previous processes in

‘completed and WIP inventories’• Use short-cut to allocate losses• Suitability of process costing in service org.• Batch or operation costing• Process a joint/by-product or sell-it.

Page 4: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

A comparison of job & process costing

Page 5: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

A comparison of job & process costing

Page 6: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Example 5.1

During the month the company input into the production process 12 000 litres at a cost of £120 000. There was no opening or closing inventories and all output was fully complete.

Page 7: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Example 5.1

• Input = 12000 litres at a cost of £120000• Normal loss = 1/6 of input• Actual output = 9000 litres• CPU = £120 000/Expected output (10

000 litres) = £ 12• Cost of completed production

= £108 000 (9000 ×£12)• Cost of abnormal loss

= £12000 (1000 × £12)

Input Cost Expected outcome

Page 8: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Normal and abnormal losses

• Normal losses cannot be avoided – Cost is absorbed by good production.

• Abnormal losses are avoidable – Cost is recorded separately – Treated as a period cost– Removed from process costs, recorded separately

as a loss in the abnormal loss account– Not carried forward as a future expense

Page 9: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Abnormal losses in process with no scrap value

Process accountUnits Unit

Cost (£)

(£) Units Unit Cost (£)

(£)

Input cost

12000 10 120 000 Normal Loss 2 000 - -

Output to finished goods inventory 9000 12 108 000Abnormal loss 1000 12 12 000

120 000 120 000

Page 10: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Normal Losses in process with a scrap value

• In case 4: Actual output = Expected output No abnormal loss/gain ONLY normal loss• Loss units have a scrap value of £5 per litre

Input Cost less £SCRAP value of normal loss Expected outcome

£120 000 – (2000 x £5) 10 000 litres=

£11=

Page 11: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Normal losses in process with a scrap value

Process accountUnits Unit

Cost (£)

(£) Units Unit Cost (£)

(£)

Input cost

12000 10 120 000 Normal Loss 2 000 - 10 000

Output to finished goods inventory 10 000 11 110 000

120 000 120 000

Scrap value is credited against the normal loss

entry in the process account

Page 12: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Abnormal losses in process with a scrap value

• In case 5: Actual output <> Expected output • Actual output = 9 000 l normal loss= 2000 &

abnormal loss of 1000 • Loss units have a scrap value of £5 per litre• What is the objective of process costing?

– Calculate the cost per unit for expected output! Only take scrap value of the normal loss into account

Page 13: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Abnormal losses in process with a scrap value

Process accountUnits Unit

Cost (£)

(£) Units Unit Cost (£)

(£)

Input cost

12000 10 120 000 Normal Loss 2 000 - 10 000

Output to finished goods inventory 9 000 11 99 000Abnormal Loss 1 000 11 11 000

120 000 120 000Scrap value is NOT

credited against the abnormal loss

entry in the process account

Page 14: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Abnormal losses in process with a scrap value

Abnormal loss account(£) (£)

Process account 11 000 Cash sale for units scrapped 5 000

Profit and Loss account 6 000

11 000 11 000

Page 15: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Abnormal gains with a scrap value

• In case 6: Actual output > Expected output • Actual output = 11 000 l normal loss= 1000

& abnormal gain of 1000 • Gain units have a scrap value of £5 per litre• What is the objective of process costing?

– Calculate the cost per unit for expected output! Only take scrap value of the normal loss into account

Page 16: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Abnormal gains with a scrap value

• The net cost incurred in case 6 in the process is £ 115 000 = (£120000 input cost – 1000l spoilt with a sales value of £5 per litre)

Amount transferred to finished goods 121 000Less: abnormal gain(1000 x £11) 11 000 less lost sales of spoiled units 5 000 6 000

115 000

Cost per unit remains at £11/u and is not affected by the abnormal gain.

Page 17: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Abnormal gains in process with a scrap value

Process accountUnits Unit

Cost (£)

(£) Units Unit Cost (£)

(£)

Input cost 12000 10 120 000 Normal Loss 2 000 - 10 000

Abnormal gain

1000 11 11 000 Output to finished goods inventory 11 000 11 121 000

131 000 131 000

Page 18: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Abnormal gains in process with a scrap value

Abnormal gain account(£) (£)

Normal loss account 5 000 Process account 11 000

Profit and Loss account 6 000

11 000 11 000

Normal Loss (Income due from normal losses)(£) (£)

Process account 10 000 Abnormal gain account 5 000

Cash from spoiled units 5 00010 000 10 000

Page 19: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Work in progress partially complete

Equivalent production & closing WIP

Partly completed units are expressed as fully completed equivalent units in order to compute CPU (e.g. 8000 units complete & 2000 partly completed) Must calculate equivalent production of the partially completed units – estimate the %age complete. Assume 50% complete 2000 x 50% = 1000). Cost per unit (CPU) = 20

ExampleOpening WIP NilUnits introduced into the process 10 000Units completed and transferred to next process 8 000Closing WIP (2000 @ 50% complete) 1 000

Page 20: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Work in progress partially complete

Equivalent production & closing WIP

Example continued…

Opening WIP Units introduced into the processMaterial costs (8 000 x 20) 160 000Closing WIP (2000 x 50% x 20) 20 000

180 000

Page 21: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Different degrees of completion

• Not all elements may have reached the same degree of completion.

• Material – entered at start of process will be fully complete

• Labour – added uniformly throughout the process

Page 22: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

P111_Example 5.2Example Process A Process B• Opening WIP Nil• Units introduced into the process 14 000 10 000• Units completed and transferred to next process 10 000 9

000• Closing WIP (50% complete) 4 000 1

000• Costs of production transferred from process A £270

000• Materials cost (introduced at start) £210 000 £108 000• Conversion cost £144 000 £171 000

• Materials are added at the start of the process for Process A and at the end of the process for Process B and conversion costs are added uniformly throughout both processes.

Page 23: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

P111_Example 5.2 Calculation of cost per unit for Process A

Cost Element

Total cost Completed units

WIP equivalent units

Total Equivalent units

Cost per unit

Materials 210 000 10 000 4 000 14 000 R15 / u

Conversion cost

144 000 10 000 (50%) 2 000 12 000 R12 / u

354 000 R27 / unit

Value of work-in progress: 84 000

Materials (4000x15) 60 000

Conversion cost (2000x12) 24 000

Completed units(10000 x 27) 270 000

Total production costs 354 000

Page 24: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Example 5.2 Calculation of cost per unit for Process B

Cost Element Total cost Completed units

WIP equivalent units

Total Equivalent units

Cost per unit

Previous process cost 270 000 9 000 1 000 10 000 R27 / u

Materials 108 000 9 000 - 9 000 R12 / u

Conversion cost 171 000 9 000 (50%) 500 9 500 R18 / u

549 000 R57 / unit

Value of work-in progress: 36 000

Previous process cost 27 000

Materials - -

Conversion cost (500x18) 9 000

Completed units(9000 x 57) 513 000

Total production costs 549 000

Page 25: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

P113_Example 5.3Process X Process Y

Opening Work in progress 6 000 (60% converted) 2 000 (80% converted)

Materials 72 000 12 000

Conversion cost 45 900 38 400

Units started in this period 16 000 18 000

Closing WIP 4000 (75% complete) 8 000 units (50% complete)

Materials added 192 000 60 000

Conversion cost 225 000 259 200

Page 26: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Example 5.3 Calculation of cost using weighted average method - Process X

Cost Element Opening WIP

Current cost

Total cost

Completed units

WIP equivalent units

Total Equivalent units

Cost per unit

Materials 72 000 192 000 264 000 18 000 4 000 22 000 R12/u

Conversion cost 45 900 225 000 270 900 18 000 3 000 21 000 R12.90/u

117 900 534 900 R24.90/unit

Value of work-in progress: 86 700

Previous process cost

Materials – (4000 x 12) 48 000

Conversion cost (3000x12.90) 38 700

Completed units(18000 x 24.90) 448 200

Total production costs 534 900

Page 27: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Example 5.3 Calculation of cost using weighted average method - Process X

Input Output Raw materials Conversion

(units) Details (units) (units) % (units) %

6 000 Opening WIP

16 000 Put into production

Completed from:

Opening WIP 6 000 2 400 60

Current production 12 000 18 000 100 15 600 100

Completed & Trfed 18 000 18 000 18 000 0

Closing WIP 4 000 4 000 3 000 75

22 000 22 000 21 000

Page 28: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Cost Element Opening WIP

Current cost

Total cost

Completed units

WIP equivalent units

Total Equivalent units

Cost per unit

Previous process cost 91 800 448 200 540 000 12 000 8 000 20 000 R27/u

Materials 12 000 60 000 72 000 12 000 - 12 000 R6/u

Conversion cost 38 400 259 200 297 600 12 000 8000x.54000

16 000 R18.60/u

142 200 909 600 R51.60/unit

Value of work-in progress: 290 400

Previous process cost(8000x27) 216 000

Materials – (0 x 12) 0

Conversion cost (4000x18.60) 74 400

Completed units(12000 x 51.60) 619 200

Total production costs 909 600

Example 5.3 - Process Y

Page 29: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

P113_Example 5.3Process X Process Y

Opening Work in progress 6 000 (60% converted) 2 000 (80% converted)

Materials 72 000 12 000

Conversion cost 45 900 38 400

Units started in this period 16 000 18 000

Closing WIP 4000 (75% complete) 8 000 units (50% complete)

Materials added 192 000 60 000

Conversion cost 225 000 259 200

Page 30: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Process X- First in first out Pg 115Cost Element Current

costCompleted units less opening WIP equivalent units

Closing unitsWIP equivalent units

Total Equivalent units

Cost per unit

Materials 192 000 12000 (18000-6000) 4 000 16 000 R12/u

Conversion cost 225 000 14400 (18000-3600) 3 000 17 400 R12.931/u

417 000 R24.931/unit

Value of work-in progress:

Opening WIP 117 900

Materials – (12000 x 12) 144 000

Conversion cost (14400x12.931) 186 207 448 107

Closing WIP:

Materials – (4000 x 12) 48 000

Conversion cost (3000x12.931) 38 793 86 793

Total production costs 534 900

Page 31: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Process Y- First in first outCost Element Current

costCompleted units less opening WIP equivalent units

Closing unitsWIP equivalent units

Total Equivalent units

Cost per unit

Previous process 448 107 10 000 (12000-2000) 8 000 18 000 R24.8948

Materials 60 000 10 000 (12000-2000) - 10 000 R6/u

Conversion cost 259 200 10 400 (12000-1600) 4 000 14 400 R18/u

417 000 R48.8948/unit

Cost of completed production

Opening WIP 142 200

Previous process (10000x 24.8948) 248 948

Materials – (10000 x 6) 60 000

Conversion cost (10400x18) 187 200 638 348

Closing WIP:

Previous process 199 159

Materials -

Conversion cost (4000x18 72 000 271 159

Total production costs 534 900

Page 32: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Process Y- First in first out

Value of work-in progress:

Opening WIP 142 200

Previous process (10 000x24.8948) 248 948

Materials – (10 000 x 6) 144 000

Conversion cost (10 400x18) 187 200 638 348

Closing WIP:

Previous process (8 000x24.8948) 199 159

Materials -

Conversion cost (4000x18) 72 000 271 159

Total production costs 909 507

Page 33: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Ex5A.1Losses in process & partially completed units

Input Output Raw materials Conversion

(units) Details (units) (units) % (units) %

Total cost 5000 3400

0 Opening WIP

1 000 Put into production

Completed from:

Opening WIP 0

Current production 600 600 100 600 100

Completed & Trfed 600 600 600 100

Normal loss 100 100 100

Abnormal loss

Closing WIP 300 300 150 50

1 000 1 000 850

Cost per unit 5 4

P120

Page 34: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Value of work-in progress:

Materials – (300 x 5) 1 500

Conversion cost (150 x 4) 600 2100

Completed units (600x9) 5400

Normal loss (100x9) 900 6300

Total production costs 8 400

Cost Element Total Cost Completed units

Normal loss

Closing unitsWIP equivalent units

Total Equivalent units

Cost per unit

Materials 5000 600 100 300 1000 5

Conversion cost 3400 600 100 150 850 4

R9/unit

Ex5A.1Losses in process & partially completed units

Page 35: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Input Output Raw materials Conversion

(units) Details (units) (units) % (units) %

Total cost 9400 5000 3400

0 Opening WIP

1 000 Put into production

Completed from:

Opening WIP 0

Current production 600 600 100 600 100

Completed & Trfed 600 600 600 100

Normal loss

Abnormal loss

Closing WIP 300 300 150 50

900 900 750

Cost per unit 10.0888 5.555 4.5333

Ex5A.1Losses in process & partially completed units

Page 36: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Value of work-in progress:

Materials – (300 x 5.555) 1 666.65

Conversion cost (150 x 4.533) 680 2346.65

Completed units (600x10.0888) 6053.35

Total production costs 8400.00

Cost Element Total Cost

Completed units

Closing unitsWIP equivalent units

Total Equivalent units

Cost per unit

Materials 5000 600 300 900 5.5555

Conversion cost 3400 600 150 750 4.5333

R10.0888/unit

Ex5A.1Losses in process & partially completed units

Page 37: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Cost Element Total Cost

Completed units

Abnormal loss

Closing unitsWIP equivalent units

Total Equivalent units

Cost per unit

Previous process cost 10 000 600 50 250 900 11.1111

Materials 8 000 600 50 250 900 8.8888

Conversion cost 2 900 600 25 150 775 3.742

R23.74/unit

Ex5A.2 Losses in process & partially completed units

Page 38: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Example 5A.2

Value of work-in progress: 5560

Previous process cost : 250 x 11.11 2 777

Materials: 250 x 8.88 2 222

Conversion: 150 x 3.742 561

Completed units: 600 x 23.74 14246

Abnormal loss 1094

Previous process cost : 50 x 11.11 556

Materials: 50 x 8.88 444

Conversion: 25 x 3.742 94

Total production costs 20 900

Page 39: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Different degrees of completion

• Not all elements may have reached the same degree of completion.

• Material – entered at start of process will be fully complete

• Labour – added uniformly throughout the process

Page 40: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Drury 5.14 Calculation of cost using weighted average method - Process X

Input Output Raw materials Conversion

(units) Details (units) (units) % (units) %

2 000 Opening WIP

24 000 Put into production

Completed from:

Opening WIP 2000 1 200 60

Current production 17 500 17 500 100 17 500 100

Completed & Trfed 19 500 18 700

Normal loss 2 400

Abnormal loss 1 100 1 100 100 1 100 100

Closing WIP 3 000 3 000 1 350 45

26 000 21 600 21 150

Page 41: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

P125…Drury 5.18 Step 1…calculate equivalent unitsInput Output Raw materials Labour Overheads

(units) Details (units) (units) % (units) %

800 Opening WIP

1800 Put into productionCompleted from:

Opening WIP 800

Current production

1120

Completed & Trfed 1920 1920 100 1920 1920 100

Normal loss 180

Abnormal loss

Closing WIP 500 500 100 450 90 200 40

2600 2600 2420 2370 2120

Page 42: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

P125…Drury 5.18 Step 1…calculate equivalent unitsCost Element

Opening WIPCost

Current cost

Total Cost Completed units

Closing unitsWIP equivalent units

Total Equivalent units

Cost per unit

Materials 98000 387800 485 800 1920 500 2420 A(484000/2420) R200

Labour 46000 276320 322320 1920 450 2370 (322320/2370) R136

Overheads 7600 149280 156880 1920 200 2120 (156880/2120) R74

151600 813400 R410/unit

A Total cost = current cost – (normal loss units x scrap value) = 485 800 – (180 x 10) = 485 800 – 1800 = 484 000

Value of work-in progress:

Materials

Labour

Overheads

Completed units(18000 x 24.90)

Scrap value from normal loss sales 1800

Total production costs 965000

Page 43: PROCESS COSTING. 1.Job costing assigns costs to each individual unit of output because each unit consumes different quantities of resources. 2.Process.

Quantity statementPhysical Units Equivalent Units

Input Output Raw Materials Conversion Cost

(units) Details (units) units % units %

1200 Put into production

Completed & transferred 900 900 900

Normal loss 200 200 200

Abnormal loss 100 100 100

1200 1 200 1 200 1 200


Recommended