Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 1
Micr
o
Production Possibility Frontier
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 2
Micr
oThe Production Possibilities Frontier
Let’s introduce the Production Possibilities Frontier– better known as the PPF.
The PPF is a basic workhorse in economics.
Important for understanding some basic issues in economics.
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 3
Micr
o
The PPF
Great application is with international trade theory.
Helps one understand and distinguish between comparative advantage and absolute advantage.
An important historical figure in all this is David Ricardo.
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 4
Micr
o
David Ricardo
Famous 19th century British economist. Some consider him the grandfather of
international trade theory. Very influential in pioneering the theory of
comparative advantage, inter alia. Very interesting, very bright guy. Had a lot of say about the “corn laws” in
England.
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 5
Micr
oThe Production Possibility Frontier - What Is It?
The description of the best possible combinations of two goods to produce using all of the available resources.
Shows the trade-off between more of one good in terms of the other.
Assumes: input endowments given, technology given, time given and efficient production.
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 6
Micr
o
Opportunity Cost
The opportunity cost of an activity is the value of the resources used in that activity when they are measured by what they would have produced when used in their next best alternative.
The slope of the Production Possibility Frontier measures the marginal opportunity cost of producing one good in terms of the amount of the other good foregone.
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 7
Micr
o
A Typical PPF Picture
Guns
Butter
unattainable
inefficient just attainable
just attainable
The marginal opportunity cost of guns in terms of butter is increasing as we move down the PPF!
The PPF is typically bowed-out or linear.
It is not bowed-in
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 8
Micr
o
Comparative Advantage
The person with the lower marginal opportunity cost of an activity has the comparative advantage at that activity.
This means that the person with the comparative advantage can produce the activity by giving up the smallest amount of the alternative activity.
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 9
Micr
oThe Idea of Comparative Advantage and Trade
Specialization and free trade will benefit all trading parties, even when some are “absolutely” more efficient producers than others.
Need to understand absolute vs. comparative advantage.
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 10
Micr
oAbsolute vs. Comparative Advantage Applied to Trade Absolute advantage: if your country uses fewer resources
to produce a given unit of output than the other country. Comparative advantage: if your country can produce the
output at a lower marginal cost in terms of other goods foregone than the other country.
Every country (or person, or economy) has a comparative advantage at some activity.
Absolute advantage is not important and may not always happen. Sometimes people or countries have the absolute advantage in nothing! Yet trade possibilities still exist.
It’s all about comparative advantage.
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 11
Micr
oPPFs and Comparative Advantage
In this example, there are two goods being produced: Corn meal and RAM. Juanita has an absolute advantage at both: she can produce more of each than
Julio. Juanita has a comparative advantage at producing RAM compared to Julio: she
gives up 3.00 kg/day of corn meal to make an additional 1k of chips. Julio has a comparative advantage at producing corn meal compared to Juanita: he
gives up 0.25 k chips to make an additional kg of corn meal.
Maximum Production Rates Production Possibilities (2)
ProducerCorn meal (kg/day)
Random Access
Memory (k chips/day)
Relative Price of RAM (kg corn per k
chips)
Relative Price of Corn Meal (k chips per
kg corn meal)Juanita 12 4 3.00 0.33Julio 8 2 4.00 0.25
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 12
Micr
o
Production Possibilities When we draw the
production possibilities for Juanita and Julio, there is a kink at 8 kg/day corn meal and 4.00 k chips/day RAM.
The chart shows who specializes in corn meal and RAM at each production level.
Production Possibilities (2)
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 111213 141516 171819 202122 232425 262728 2930
Corn meal (kg/day)
RA
M (
k c
hip
s/d
ay) Juanita varies production
of both while Julio stays specialized in corn meal. Slope equals Juanita's price of corn meal in terms of RAM = -0.33 k chips/kg corn meal.
Julio varies production of both while Juanita stays specialized in RAM. Slope equals Julio's price of corn meal in terms of RAM = -0.25 k chips/kg corn meal.
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 13
Micr
o
Adding a Third Producer
Sergio has no absolute advantage; however, he has a comparative advantage over both Juanita and Julio in the production of RAM.
He sacrifices 2.00 kg of corn meal to make an additional 1k of chips.
Maximum Production Rates Production Possibilities (2)
ProducerCorn meal (kg/day)
Random Access
Memory (k chips/day)
Relative Price of RAM (kg corn per k
chips)
Relative Price of Corn Meal (k chips per
kg corn meal)Juanita 12 4 3.00 0.33Julio 8 2 4.00 0.25Sergio 2 1 2.00 0.50
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 14
Micr
o
Adding a Fourth Producer
Question: What is Maria’s comparative advantage with respect to each of the other three producers?
Maximum Production Rates Production Possibilities (2)
ProducerCorn meal (kg/day)
Random Access
Memory (k chips/day)
Relative Price of RAM (kg corn per k
chips)
Relative Price of Corn Meal
(k chips per kg corn meal)
Juanita 12 4 3.00 0.33Julio 8 2 4.00 0.25Sergio 2 1 2.00 0.50Maria 8 1 8.00 0.13
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 15
Micr
oComparative Advantage and Specialization
As more and more producers enter the economy, the production possibility curve gets more and more bowed out (concave).
Along any segment, most of the producers are fully specialized.
Only one producer is producing both goods along any segment.
Production Possibilities (All)
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1213 141516 1718 192021 2223 242526 2728 2930
Corn meal (kg/day)
RA
M (
k c
hip
s/d
ay)
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 16
Micr
oThe Supply Curve from the PPF
At each relative price of RAM in terms of foregone corn meal, we can determine the market supply
The table shows how much is supplied and who is producing.
Supply Curve for RAM Supply Curve of Corn Meal
Quantity of RAM (k
Chips)
Relative Price of RAM
(kg corn/k RAM)
Who is Producing RAM Chips
0 0.00 No one1 2.00 Sergio5 3.00 Sergio, Juanita7 4.00 Sergio, Juanita, Julio8 8.00 Sergio, Juanita, Julio, Maria
Maximum Production Rates Production Possibilities (2)
ProducerCorn meal (kg/day)
Random Access
Memory (k chips/day)
Relative Price of RAM (kg corn per k
chips)
Relative Price of Corn Meal
(k chips per kg corn meal)
Juanita 12 4 3.00 0.33Julio 8 2 4.00 0.25Sergio 2 1 2.00 0.50Maria 8 1 8.00 0.13
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 17
Micr
o
The Supply Curve for RAM
The graph shows the supply curve for RAM based on the data in the previous table. Each additional supplier is shown above the segment where that supplier determines the relative price.
Supply Curve for RAM
0.001.002.003.004.005.006.007.008.009.00
10.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RAM (k chips/day)
Re
lati
ve P
rice
(k
g c
orn
m
eal
/k c
hip
s)
The supply curve of RAM is rising, reflecting the increasing opportunity cost (also called marginal cost) of RAM in terms of foregone corn meal.
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 18
Micr
o
Supply Curve for Corn Meal
Do the exact same thing... But in reverse!
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 19
Micr
oSupply Curve for Corn Meal: Graph
The supply curve for corn meal is shown above. The new producer along each segment is
indicated above.
Supply Curve for Corn Meal
0.000
0.100
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.600
0.700
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Corn Meal (kg/day)
Re
lati
ve P
rice
(k
ch
ips
/kg
m
eal
)
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 20
Micr
o
International Trade
All the facts are the same as in the previous example except that now we are talking about countries that can trade at an international price.
The international price is between the relative prices that prevail in each country when no trade is permitted.
There are many countries in the market in addition to the two shown so that a country can buy or sell as much as it wants or produces at the international price.
Maximum Production Rates Country U
ProducerCorn meal (kg/day)
Random Access
Memory (k chips/day)
Relative Price of RAM (kg corn per k
chips)
Relative Price of Corn Meal
(k chips per kg corn meal)
Country U 12 4 3.00 0.33Country M 8 2 4.00 0.25International price 3.50 0.29
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 21
Micr
oCountry U’s Production and Gains from Trade
Country U has a comparative advantage in RAM production.
The blue line shows its production possibilities without trade. Slope = –0.33.
The red line shows the possibilities at the international price of 0.29 k chips per kg corn (or 3.50 kg corn/ k chips RAM). Slope = –0.29.
The gain to trade is the distance between the two production possibility curves.
Country U Production Possibilities
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Corn Meal (kg/day)
RA
M (
k ch
ips/
da
y)
RAM (kchips/day) noTrade
RAM (kchips/day) withTrade
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 22
Micr
oCountry M’s Production and Gains from Trade
Country M has a comparative advantage in corn meal production.
The blue line shows its production possibilities without trade. Slope = –0.25.
The red line shows the possibilities at the international price of 0.29 k chips/ kg corn (or 3.50 kg corn/ k chips RAM). Slope = –0.29.
The gain to trade is the distance between the two production possibility curves.
Country M Production Possibilities
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Corn Meal (kg/day)
RA
M (
k ch
ips/
da
y)
RAM (kchips/day) noTrade
RAM (kchips/day) withTrade
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 23
Micr
o
Question
If country U chooses to consume 7 kg/day of corn meal, what is the gain to trade from specializing in RAM production, measured in k chips/day of RAM?
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 24
Micr
o
Answer The vertical distance
between the blue and red PPFs at a corn meal consumption of 7 kg/day measures country U’s gain to trade in k chips RAM/day.
The point on the blue PPF is the best country U can do without trade.
With trade country U can consume more RAM per day, up to the point on the red PPF.
Country U Production Possibilities
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Corn Meal (kg/day)
RA
M (
k ch
ips/
da
y)
RAM (kchips/day) noTrade
RAM (kchips/day) withTrade
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 25
Micr
o
Question
What is country M’s gain if it chooses to consume 1.5 k chips per day, measured in kg/day of corn meal?
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 26
Micr
o
Answer The horizontal distance
between the red and blue PPFs measures country M’s gain to trade at a RAM consumption of 1.5 k chips/day.
The blue PPF is the best that country M can do without trade.
Trade allows country M to specialize in the production of corn meal and still benefit from a higher consumption of RAM.
Country M Production Possibilities
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Corn Meal (kg/day)
RA
M (
k ch
ips/
da
y)
RAM (kchips/day) noTrade
RAM (kchips/day) withTrade
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 27
Micr
oThe International Supply Curve for RAM
The international supply curve for RAM is a rising function of the opportunity cost of RAM in terms of foregone corn meal.
Which countries actually produce RAM for the international market will depend upon where the demand curve crosses this supply curve.
RAM (K chips/day)
Relative Price (kg corn meal/k chips)
Most Efficient Producers
Least Efficient Producers
Demand
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 28
Micr
oThe Sources ofComparative Advantage The Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem is a theory that
explains the existence of a country’s comparative advantage by its factor endowments.– Factor endowments: the quantity and quality of labor,
land, and natural resources of a country.– From Sweden in the early 1900s
According to the H-O theorem, a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a product if that country is relatively well endowed with inputs used intensively in the production of that product.
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 29
Micr
oThe Sources ofComparative Advantage Edward Leamer of UCLA’s five biggies:
– Natural resources
– Knowledge capital
– Physical capital
– Land
– Skilled and unskilled labor
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 30
Micr
oOther Explanations forObserved Trade Flows Product differentiation and competitive
markets Acquired comparative advantage Natural comparative advantages Economies of scale Trading Environments Openness of Economy
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 31
Micr
o
Note of Caution Information on comparative advantage is often given in
many other forms - pay careful attention to the information you are given.
Two more ways to present the same kind of information:England Portugal
1 yd. of cloth 2 hours 1 hour1 barrel of wine 40 hours 10 hours
England Portugal1 hour of labor in cloth .5 yd. of cloth 1 yd. of cloth1 hour of labor in wine 1/40 bl. of wine 1/10 a bl. of wine
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 32
Micr
oAbsolute Advantage and Comparative Advantage
Portugal has the A.A. in both wine and cloth. England has the C.A. in cloth. Portugal has the C.A. in wine. Can you figure out the marginal opportunity cost for
each output in each country?
England Portigal1 yd. of cloth 2 hours 1 hour
1 barrel of wine 40 hours 10 hours
England Portigal1 hour of labor in cloth .5 yd. of cloth 1 yd. of cloth1 hour of labor in wine 1/40 bl. of wine 1/10 a bl. of wine
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 33
Micr
oFrom Opportunity Cost to Marginal Cost
The concept of marginal cost is the most important concept in the theory of producer supply behavior.
Marginal cost is the additional cost associated with increasing production by one unit.
In our production possibility examples, marginal cost is the value of the activity that is reduced when the other activity is increased by one unit.
Marginal cost is, therefore, the same thing as marginal opportunity cost.
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 34
Micr
o
PPF Gymnastics
Guns
Butter
PPF old
PPF new
The PPF is also useful for many other types of questions.
Questions about efficiency.
Questions about equity. Questions about tax
and transfer policy. Questions about
composition of output. Questions about growth
and productivity.