+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Production technology Ch39

Production technology Ch39

Date post: 05-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: 8laddu8
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 20

Transcript
  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    1/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-1

    CHAPTER 39

    Computer-Integrated ManufacturingSystems

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    2/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-2

    Computer-Integrated

    ManufacturingSystem

    Figure 39.1 A schematicillustration of a computer-integrated manufacturing system.Source: U. Rembold, et al.,Computer-IntegratedManufacturing and Engineering.Addison-Wesley, 1993.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    3/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-3

    CAD/CAM Flow Chart

    Figure 39.2 Information flow chart in CAD/CAM application.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    4/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-4

    CAD Modeling

    Figure 39.3 Various types of modeling for CAD.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    5/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-5

    CAD RepresentationsFigure 39.4 (a)Boundaryrepresentation ofsolids, showing the

    enclosing surfaces ofthe solid model and thegenerated solid model.(b) A solid modelrepresented ascompositions of solidprimitives. (c) Three

    representations of thesame part by CAD.Source: P. Ranky.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    6/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-6

    Octree Representation of a Solid Object

    Figure 39.5 The octree representation of a solid object. Any volume can be broken down into octants,which are then identified as solid, void, or partially filled. Shown is two-dimensional version, or

    quadtree, for representation of shapes in a plane.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    7/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-7

    Routing SheetFigure 39.6 An exampleof a simple routing sheet.These operation sheetsmay include additional

    information on materials,tooling, estimated time foreach operation, processingparameters (such as cuttingspeeds and feeds), andother information. Therouting sheet travels with

    the part from operation tooperation. The currenttrend is to store all relevantdata in computers and toaffix to the part a bar codethat serves as a key intothe database of parts

    information.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    8/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-8

    Group Technology

    Figure 39.7 Grouping partsaccording to geometric similarities.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    9/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-9

    Functionaland Group-

    TechnologyLayout

    Figure 39.8 (a) Functional layoutof machine tools in a traditionalplant. Arrosw indicate the flow of

    materials and parts in variousstages of completion. (b) Group-technology (cellular) layout.Legend: L = lathe, M = millingmachine, D = drilling machine,G = grinding machine, A =assembly. Source: M. P. Groover.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    10/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-10

    Decision-Tree CodingFigure 39.9 Decision-tree classification for a sheet-metal bracket. Source: G. W. Millar.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    11/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-11

    Opitz Classification and Coding SystemFigure 39.10Classificationand codingsystem

    according toOpitz,consisting fo 5digits and asupplementarycode of 4 digits.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    12/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-12

    MultiClass Classification and Coding System

    Figure 39.11 Typical MultiClass code for a machined part. Source: Organization for IndustrialResearch.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    13/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-13

    KK-3 System for Rotational ComponentsFigure 39.12 The structure of a KK-3system for rotational components.Source: Japan Society for the Promotionof Machine Industry.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    14/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-14

    Flexible Manufacturing Cell

    Figure 39.13 Schematic viewof a flexible manufacturingcell, showing two machinetools, an automated partinspection system, and acentral robot serving these

    machines. Source: P. K.Wright.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    15/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-15

    Flexible Manufacturing SystemFigure 39.14 A generalview of a flexiblemanufacturing system,showing several machine

    tools and an automatedguided vehicle. Source:Courtesy of CincinnateMilacron, Inc.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    16/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-16

    Comparison of the Characteristics of TransferLines and Flexible-Manufacturing Systems

    TABLE 39.1Characteristic Transfer line FMS

    Types of parts made Generally few Infinite

    Lot size > 100 150

    Part changing time 1/2 to 8 hr 1 min

    Tool change Manual Automatic

    Adaptive control Difficult Available

    Inventory High Low

    Production during breakdown None Partial

    Efficiency 6070% 85%

    Justification for capital expenditure Simple Difficult

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    17/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-17

    Local Area Network Topology

    Figure 39.15 Three basic types of topology for a local area network (LAN) (a) Thestartopologyis suitable for situations that are not subject to frequent configuration changes. All messages passthrough a central station. Telephone systems in office buildings usually have this type oftopology. (b) In the ringtopology all individual user stations are connected in a continuous ring.The message is forwarded from one station to the next until it reaches its assigned destination.Although the wiring is relatively simple, the failure of one station shuts down the entire network.

    (c) In the bus topology all stations have independent access to the bus. This system is reliable andis easier than the other two to service. Because its arrangement is similar to the layout of themachines in the factory, its installation is relatively easy, and it can be reagrranged when themachines are rearranged.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    18/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-18

    ISO/OSI Communication Model

    Figure 39.16 TheISO/OSI referencemodel for opencommunication. Source:U. Rembold, et al.Computer IntegratedManufacturing andEngineering. Addison-Wesley, 1993.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    19/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-19

    Expert SystemFigure 39.17 Basic structure of anexpert system. The knowledge baseconsists of knowledge rules (generalinformation about the problem) and the

    inference rules (the way conclusionsare reached). The results may becommunicated to the user through thenatural-language interface. Source: K.W. Goff,Mechanical Engineering,October 1985.

  • 7/31/2019 Production technology Ch39

    20/20

    Kalpakjian SchmidManufacturing Engineering and Technology 2001 Prentice-Hall Page 39-20

    Expert System Applied to an Industrial Robot

    Figure 39.18 Expert system, as applied to an industrial robot guided by machine vision.


Recommended