• SNSF (Swiss National Science Foundation) Professor for intelligent
maintenance systems at ETH Zürich
• Before, she was heading the research group “Smart Maintenance” at
the Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)
• Holds Ph.D. in civil engineering from ETH Zurich, and Diploma degree
in industrial engineering from Hamburg University of Technology
• Gained valuable industrial experience as reliability engineer for railway
rolling stock and as reliability and maintenance expert for railway
systems
• Research focuses on Data‐Driven Condition‐Based and Predictive
Maintenance, amongst others
Prof. Dr. Olga Fink, ETH Zurich
1
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
Prof. Dr. Olga Fink
06.03.2019
Deep learning and artificial intelligence for predictive
maintenance applications
Olga Fink 2
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
Examples of what AI can do today
06.03.2019Olga Fink
Recognize ObjectsSpot cancer in tissue slides
Hold Interviews at Press Conferences
Teach Itself How to Code
Write film scriptsPaint paintings that
are sold
Source: www.businessinsider.com
3
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
06.03.2019Olga Fink 4
In which areas does AI excel today?
Artificial Narrow Intelligence
Artificial General Intelligence
ArtificialSuperintelligence
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
Application Fields of Deep Learning and Artificial Intelligence
25.02.2019Olga Fink
Predictive
Maintenance
Computer Vision Natural Language Processing Speech Recognition
Olga Fink 5
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
06.03.2019Olga Fink
Challenges in Predictive Maintenance
6
Few occurring faults with very specific characteristics + Large variety of different fault types Not sufficient examples for the algorithms to learn from
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
Learning the “health” indicator
“Health Indicator”
06.03.2019Olga Fink 7
Learning
features
automatically
Michau, G., T. Palmé, and O. Fink (2017): Deep Feature Learning Network for Fault Detection and Isolation, Annual conference of the PHM society, October 2017
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
Generator Health Monitoring
320 monitoring sensors:
Partial discharge
Rotor shaft voltage
Rotor flux
Stator end winding vibration
Stator Water Temperature
275 days of recorded operation,
60 000 observations
1 faultCan only use Healthy data for training!
06.03.2019Olga Fink 8
Michau, G., T. Palmé, and O. Fink (2017): Deep Feature Learning Network for Fault Detection and Isolation, Annual conference of the PHM society, October 2017
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
Generator Health Monitoring
HealthyAbnormal behavior 100 days before!
06.03.2019Olga Fink 9
Time [days]
No
rmali
zed
dis
tan
ceto
the
train
ing
set
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
06.03.2019Olga Fink
Challenges in Predictive Maintenance
10
Few occurring faults with very specific characteristics + Large variety of different fault types Not sufficient examples for the algorithms to learn from
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
06.03.2019Olga Fink
Challenges in Predictive Maintenance
11
Few occurring faults with very specific characteristics + Large variety of different fault types Not sufficient examples for the algorithms to learn from
Classification (that is typically applied in fault isolation) not suitable for distinguishing between the fault types
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
Integrated fault diagnostics
“Health Indicator”
06.03.2019Olga Fink 12
Michau, G., T. Palmé, and O. Fink (2017): Deep Feature Learning Network for Fault Detection and Isolation, Annual conference of the PHM society, October 2017
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
Water Temperature Shaft Voltage Rotor Flux Rotor Flux
Integrated fault diagnostics: Generator case study
At no additional cost!
06.03.2019Olga Fink 13
Michau, G., T. Palmé, and O. Fink (2017): Deep Feature Learning Network for Fault Detection and Isolation, Annual conference of the PHM society, October 2017
Integrated!
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
06.03.2019Olga Fink
Challenges in Predictive Maintenance
14
Few occurring faults with very specific characteristics + Large variety of different fault types Not sufficient examples for the algorithms to learn from
Classification (that is typically applied in fault isolation) not suitable for distinguishing between the fault types
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
06.03.2019Olga Fink
Challenges in Predictive Maintenance
15
Few occurring faults with very specific characteristics + Large variety of different fault types Not sufficient examples for the algorithms to learn from
Classification (that is typically applied in fault isolation) not suitable for distinguishing between the fault types
Varying and evolving operating conditions Even healthy
system conditions are not always representative
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
06.03.2019Olga Fink 16
Example Gas Turbines
Only a short observation period
Winter
16Olga Fink 25.02.2019
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
06.03.2019
Example Gas Turbines
Olga Fink
Extend the
observation period
17Olga Fink 25.02.2019
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
06.03.2019Olga Fink
Solution: Using the fleet experience! Transfer the experience
Transfer of experience with respect to the healthy
operating conditions Enlarge the set of
representative «healthy data»
Transfer the experience with respect to faulty system
conditions
But: single units are operated differently, have different configurations and
environmental conditions
Challenge: If fleet units too similar no additional experience added
If fleet units too different faulty system conditions recognized as healthy
18
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
Using the fleet experience
06.03.2019Olga Fink
Michau, Gabriel, Thomas Palmé, and Olga Fink. 2018. “Fleet PHM for Critical Systems: Bi-Level Deep Learning Approach for Fault Detection.” In
European Prognognostics and Health Management Conference. Utrecht.
A
B
19
A B
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
Fleet of Gas Turbines Plant 1: Healthy
06.03.2019 Olga Fink
20Olga Fink 2025.02.2019
Michau, Gabriel, Thomas Palmé, and Olga Fink. 2018. “Fleet PHM for Critical Systems: Bi-Level Deep Learning Approach for Fault Detection.” In
European Prognognostics and Health Management Conference. Utrecht.
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
Fleet of Gas Turbines Plant 2: Fault
06.03.2019 Olga Fink
21Olga Fink 2125.02.2019
Michau, Gabriel, Thomas Palmé, and Olga Fink. 2018. “Fleet PHM for Critical Systems: Bi-Level Deep Learning Approach for Fault Detection.” In
European Prognognostics and Health Management Conference. Utrecht.
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
06.03.2019Olga Fink
Challenges in Predictive Maintenance
22
Few occurring faults with very specific characteristics + Large variety of different fault types Not sufficient examples for the algorithms to learn from
Classification (that is typically applied in fault isolation) not suitable for distinguishing between the fault types
Varying and evolving operating conditions Even healthy
system conditions are not always representative
||Intelligent Maintenance Systems
06.03.2019Olga Fink 23
Areas of further research
AI in Mainte-nance
Interpre-tability
Self-Adapta-
bility
Robust-ness
Scala-bility
Auto-mation
Legal notice
24
©2019 Swiss Re. All rights reserved. You are not permitted to create any modifications or derivative works of this presentation or webinar or to use it for commercial or other public purposes without the prior written permission of Swiss Re.
The information and opinions contained in the presentation are provided as at the date of the presentation and are subject to change without notice. Although the information used was taken from reliable sources, Swiss Re does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or comprehensiveness of the details given. All liability for the accuracy and completeness thereof or for any damage or loss resulting from the use of the information contained in this presentation is expressly excluded. Under no circumstances shall Swiss Re or its Group companies be liable for any financial or consequential loss relating to this presentation.
25