Progeny Performance Report Cohort 4 - Angus Australia · PDF fileProgeny Performance Report...

Progeny Performance Report

Cohort 4

Acknowledgments:

Angus Australia thanks the following organisations for their support of the Angus Sire BenchmarkingProgram (ASBP):

Co-Funding Partner

Meat and Livestock Australia

Industry Partners

Rangers Valley FeedlotJohn Dee Abattoir

University of New England (UNE)Vetoquinol

Co-operator Cow Herds

Brad and Marg Gilmour, Boorcan, VIC.Rob and Sally Bulle, Ardrossan, Holbrook, NSW.

Hugh Munro, Glenroy, Gravesend, NSW.Roger and Geralyn Flower, Myola, Black Mountain, NSW.Trevor Nash, Stradbroke Pastoral, Yarralee, Coolah, NSW.

Rob Dugdale and Jeff Richie, Springmount, Black Mountain, NSW.Richard and Ruth Puddicombe, Burindi, Barraba, NSW.

Shaun Uebergang, Pearsby Hall, Delungra, NSW.Stephen and Amity Chase, Waitara, Trangie, NSW.

NSW DPI, Trangie Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, NSW.NSW DPI, Glen Innes Research Station, Glen Innes, NSW.

University of Sydney, Nowley, Spring Ridge, NSW.David and Pia Butcher, Woorak, Bundarra, NSW.

Bull Owners and Nominators

Angus Australia thanks the numerous bull owner and nominators that have entered the ASBP. Forsire ownership details please refer to the Angus Australia website (www.angusaustralia.com.au).

Data Analysis Support

Matias Suarez, NSW DPI, Armidale, NSW.Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU), University of New England, Armidale, NSW.

Agricultural Business Research Institute (ABRI-BREEDPLAN), Armidale, NSW.

Angus Sire Benchmarking Program

The Angus Sire Benchmarking Program (ASBP) is a major initiative of Angus Australia with supportfrom Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA) and industry partners such as Vetoquinol, Rangers ValleyFeedlot and John Dee Abattoir.

The major objectives of the ASBP include:1. Generate progeny test data on modern Angus bulls, particularly for hard to measure traits

such as feed efficiency, abattoir carcase measurement, meat quality attributes & femalereproduction.

2. Generate data for the validation & refinement of Angus BREEDPLAN.3. Build a comprehensive phenotype and genotype database on Australian Angus for genomic

technology validation, research and development.

To meet the project objectives Angus Australia aims to join an average of 40 sires a year toapproximately 2,000 Angus cows to achieve a minimum of 25 progeny (50:50 steers and heifers)per sire using a fixed time AI program. The Angus cows are located across several commercial co-operator herds located in New South Wales and Victoria.

The Angus sires that enter the ASBP are nominated by Angus Australia members. Before enteringthe program the sires are assessed for a range of factors such as genetic diversity, geneticcondition status, BREEDPLAN EBVs and selection index values. Once the progeny are born they arecomprehensively performance recorded for calving ease, growth, temperament, heiferreproduction, structure, feed efficiency, abattoir carcase and beef quality attributes.

ASBP Progeny Performance Report

The ASBP Progeny Performance report includes two sections to assist with assessment of thegenetic merit of the ASBP sires, being:

1. BREEDPLAN Sire Listing – The first section includes the Angus BREEDPLAN EBVs andselection Indexes from the noted monthly analysis (e.g. April 2016).

For selection purposes it is strongly advised that the BREEDPLAN EBVs and selectionindexes be used primarily. They are the highest accuracy information to use in selection asthey take into account all available industry data including the data generated from theASBP. They also account for information from all known relatives and genetic correlationsbetween traits as well as being able to be compared across cohorts and the Anguspopulation.

2. ASBP Progeny Performance Listing – The second section includes progeny average valuesand rankings for a range of traits recorded within the ASBP. This listing provides anindication on how the sires are performing within the ASBP. The values listed can only bevalidly used to compare sires within each cohort of the ASBP.

Each section includes introductory notes to assist with the interpretation of the information listed.

Contact – For further questions on the ASBP contact Christian Duff, Strategic Projects Manager, AngusAustralia on phone: (02) 6773 4620, mobile: 0457 457 141 or email: [email protected]

Further information on the ASBP is listed on the Angus Australia website www.angusaustralia.com.au

UNDERSTANDING THE ASBP SIRE LISTING – BREEDPLAN EBVs and SELECTION INDEXES

The following BREEDPLAN Estimated Breeding Values (EBVs) and selection Indexes are listed in this report. For further information visit www.angusaustralia.com.au

BREEDPLAN EBVs:CE Dir: Calving Ease Direct (%) EBVs are genetic differences in the ability of calves to be bornunassisted from two year old heifers. Higher EBVs indicate greater calving ease.CE Dtrs: Calving Ease Daughters (%) EBVs are genetic differences in the ability of an animal’sdaughters to calve unassisted as two year old heifers. Higher EBVs indicate greater calvingease.GL: Gestation Length (days) EBVs are genetic differences in the length of time from the date ofconception to the calf birth date. Lower EBVs indicate shorter gestation length.Bwt: Birth Weight (kg) EBVs are genetic differences in calf weight at birth. Lower EBVs indicatelighter birth weight.200: 200 Day Growth (kg) EBVs are genetic differences in live weight at 200 days of age due togenetics for growth. Higher EBVs indicate heavier live weight.400: 400 Day Weight (kg) EBVs are genetic differences in live weight at 400 days of age. HigherEBVs indicate heavier live weight.600: 600 Day Weight (kg) EBVs are genetic differences in live weight at 600 days of age. HigherEBVs indicate heavier live weight.Mwt: Mature Cow Weight (kg) EBVs are genetic differences in mature weight at 5 years of age.Higher EBVs indicate heavier mature weight.Milk: Milk (kg) EBVs are genetic differences in live weight at 200 days of age due to thematernal contribution of the dam. Higher EBVs indicate heavier live weight.SS: Scrotal Size (cm) EBVs are genetic differences in scrotal circumference at 400 days of age.Higher EBVs indicate larger scrotal size.DC: Days to Calving (days) EBVs are genetic differences in the length of time from the start ofthe joining period until subsequent calving. Lower EBVs indicate less time to calving.Cwt: Carcase Weight (kg) EBVs are genetic differences in dressed carcase weight at 750 days ofage .Higher EBVs indicate heavier carcase weight.EMA: Eye Muscle Area (cm2) EBVs are genetic differences in eye muscle area at the 12/13thrib site in a 400 kg carcase. Higher EBVs indicate larger eye muscleRib: Rib Fat (mm) EBVs are genetic differences in fat depth at the 12/13th rib site in a 400 kgcarcase. Higher EBVs indicate more fat.

Selection Indexes:ABI: The Angus Breeding Index estimates the genetic differences between animals in netprofitability per cow joined in a typical commercial self replacing herd using Angus bulls.DOM: The Domestic Index estimates the genetic differences between animals in netprofitability per cow joined in a commercial self replacing herd targeting the domesticsupermarket trade.GRN: The Heavy Grain Index estimates the genetic differences between animals in netprofitability per cow joined in a commercial self replacing herd targeting pasture grown steerswith a 200 day feedlot finishing period for the grain fed high quality, highly marbled markets.GRS: The Heavy Grass Index estimates the genetic differences between animals in netprofitability per cow joined in a commercial self replacing herd targeting pasture finishedsteers

P8: Rump Fat (mm) EBVs are genetic differences in fat depth at the P8 site in a 400 kg carcase.Higher EBVs indicate more fat.RBY: Retail Beef Yield (%) EBVs are genetic differences in saleable meat from a 400 kg carcase.Higher EBVs indicate higher yield.IMF: Intramuscular Fat (%) EBVs are genetic differences in intramuscular fat at the 12/13th ribsite in a 400 kg carcase. Higher EBVs indicate more intramuscular fat.NFI-p: NFI-p (kg/day) EBVs are genetic differences in feed intake at a standard weight and rateof weight gain when animals are in a post-weaning growing phase. Lower EBVs indicate lessfeed intake and greater feed efficiencyNFI-f: NFI-f (kg/day) EBVs are genetic differences in feed intake at a standard weight and rateof weight gain when animals are in a feedlot finishing phase. Lower EBVs indicate less feedintake and greater feed efficiencyDocil: Docility (%) EBVs are genetic differences in the proportion of an animal’s progeny thatwill have acceptable temperament. Higher EBVs indicate better temperament.

January 2017 Angus Australia BREEDPLAN - Angus Sire Benchmarking Program - Cohort 4

ABI DOM GRN GRS

Selection IndexesNFI-p NFI-f

Birth Growth Fertility Carcase OtherDocil

NameID

Estimated Breeding Values and Accuracies (%)

CE Dir CE Dtrs GL Bwt 200 400 600 Mwt Milk SS DC Cwt EMA Rib P8 RBY IMF

DGJG10

+3.4 +3.9 -1.7 +3.1 +42 +77 +87 +76 +10 +1.4 -10.4 +50 +10.6 +1.6 +0.3 -1.2 +5.3

70% 63% 94% 94% 90% 89% 91% 82% 69% 82% 63% 88% 86% 88% 86% 81% 85%

+153 +131 +190 +130ALLOURA GET CRACKING G10 +0.34 +0.81

75% 84%

-24

84%

NBBG105

-2.1 +0.7 -3.5 +5.5 +44 +79 +101 +89 +11 +1.6 -4.5 +26 +6.8 -1.1 +1.1 +1.3 +3.2

72% 59% 94% 94% 91% 92% 93% 85% 71% 85% 58% 87% 84% 87% 85% 79% 83%

+129 +118 +148 +119BALD BLAIR DAVID G105 +0.01 -0.34

71% 80%

+9

90%

VONG272

-1.2 +1.1 +0.3 +6.2 +46 +94 +142 +152 +14 +4.3 -2.1 +52 +1.2 -2.3 -1.6 +0.5 +2.1

66% 51% 93% 94% 88% 89% 91% 83% 67% 86% 52% 84% 82% 85% 82% 77% 81%

+124 +103 +144 +117BANQUET GARRETT G272 -0.42 -0.55

67% 76%

+14

80%

NUIF32

-1.8 -0.5 -0.2 +4.9 +47 +81 +109 +104 +20 +1.8 -2.5 +60 +0.5 +3.9 +3.6 -2.6 +1.3

58% 49% 90% 87% 85% 84% 86% 77% 61% 59% 50% 79% 75% 79% 76% 71% 76%

+74 +77 +59 +83BONNY BROOKE FALCO F32 +0.24 -0.18

60% 68%

-7

76%

HCAG013

+3.1 +1.1 -5.8 +3.4 +41 +79 +108 +80 +27 +3.4 -5.9 +47 +7.9 -1.6 -1.7 +1.6 +2.7

75% 67% 93% 94% 91% 91% 91% 85% 74% 88% 67% 86% 84% 87% 85% 81% 84%

+136 +120 +154 +126BOONAROO GRAVITY G13 G013 +0.05 +0.03

74% 80%

+6

87%

NGMG501

+3.5 -0.6 -7.1 +2.7 +50 +94 +141 +114 +21 -0.2 -4.4 +77 +3.2 +0.1 +0.2 -0.3 +1.8

74% 63% 94% 96% 94% 94% 94% 84% 70% 91% 58% 85% 84% 86% 84% 78% 82%

+135 +111 +144 +132BOOROOMOOKA GALILEO G501 +0.01 -0.15

67% 75%

+18

95%

QBUG49

+5.6 +5.4 -6.9 +2.7 +41 +80 +103 +96 +16 +1.6 -10.0 +58 +3.1 +1.0 -1.0 -1.8 +4.0

79% 73% 96% 96% 93% 93% 91% 85% 76% 92% 66% 89% 87% 89% 87% 83% 86%

+137 +115 +166 +119BURENDA GEIGER COUNTER G49 +0.29 +0.35

75% 82%

+13

93%

NIWH16

+0.1 +0.1 -5.8 +5.2 +46 +79 +111 +103 +14 +1.4 +2.3 +48 +4.4 -4.6 -3.1 +4.1 -1.9

63% 48% 89% 88% 85% 86% 87% 81% 68% 75% 47% 81% 76% 81% 77% 71% 76%

+73 +94 +45 +92COFFIN CREEK HORATIO H16 -0.44 -0.54

59% 68%

+9

73%

DPCG4

+1.0 -3.3 -2.7 +3.5 +41 +78 +101 +82 +18 +1.4 -6.7 +51 +4.1 +0.8 +3.9 -2.5 +2.9

76% 68% 92% 97% 95% 94% 93% 83% 75% 91% 63% 87% 85% 87% 85% 81% 84%

+110 +98 +115 +106CUDGEGONG PARK GRANGE G4 +0.40 +0.17

73% 79%

-5

80%

ASRG13

-0.3 +1.9 -7.6 +6.9 +53 +92 +125 +143 +9 +1.9 -8.9 +78 +5.7 -0.8 -2.2 +0.2 +3.5

72% 64% 93% 92% 86% 87% 89% 82% 71% 76% 62% 84% 81% 85% 82% 77% 81%

+147 +120 +182 +128DWYERS RANGE GATSBY G13 +0.14 +0.37

70% 77%

+3

80%

VICG25

+0.6 +2.2 -5.5 +4.7 +47 +86 +120 +105 +18 +4.0 -5.0 +65 +8.1 +1.9 +2.7 +0.5 +0.3

75% 57% 96% 97% 95% 95% 95% 86% 74% 94% 61% 87% 86% 88% 86% 81% 85%

+118 +108 +108 +123IRELANDS GAPSTED G25 +0.40 +0.41

72% 79%

-5

79%

NMMH105

-10.5 -6.9 -0.8 +7.5 +53 +90 +119 +110 +10 +2.9 -3.3 +73 +9.8 -1.7 +0.8 +1.7 +1.7

68% 60% 93% 90% 85% 86% 86% 79% 68% 84% 57% 80% 79% 82% 80% 76% 79%

+103 +97 +106 +102MILLAH MURRAH EVIDENT H105 +0.18 +0.22

67% 73%

+13

81%

NURH32

+2.1 +1.5 -5.1 +3.6 +51 +93 +116 +105 +19 +3.5 -7.0 +70 +7.2 +1.4 -0.6 +1.5 +2.1

70% 60% 89% 87% 84% 86% 87% 82% 70% 82% 52% 82% 78% 82% 80% 74% 78%

+140 +129 +154 +132MURRAY UPSHOT H32 +0.22 +0.72

64% 70%

-1

79%

SMPG357

+1.6 +3.2 -8.1 +6.3 +61 +106 +149 +157 +10 +3.9 -9.5 +97 +8.9 +3.3 +0.4 -0.1 +1.9

74% 64% 98% 98% 95% 94% 95% 88% 77% 91% 64% 86% 85% 87% 84% 80% 83%

+163 +129 +182 +151PATHFINDER GENESIS G357 +0.74 +1.14

71% 77%

+26

85%

NORG255

-3.4 -4.1 -3.4 +4.1 +49 +97 +137 +118 +23 +0.7 -3.3 +93 +5.7 +0.4 -2.9 -1.5 +5.4

84% 77% 98% 98% 97% 97% 97% 93% 84% 96% 68% 93% 91% 92% 91% 86% 91%

+137 +107 +179 +118RENNYLEA G255 +0.12 +0.29

78% 85%

-1

96%

VSNH40

+3.2 +0.4 -6.0 +2.1 +45 +95 +119 +98 +33 +3.8 -5.2 +53 +6.7 -0.1 -0.6 +0.6 +2.7

70% 60% 93% 91% 85% 87% 88% 82% 69% 73% 55% 84% 80% 84% 81% 75% 80%

+134 +123 +150 +126STRATHEWEN RED DAIQUIRI H40 +0.27 +0.56

66% 74%

+17

80%

NPGG121

-1.1 +1.1 -3.0 +4.2 +36 +69 +94 +87 +15 +1.7 -5.3 +59 +1.5 +3.0 +0.0 -1.3 +0.9

62% 52% 91% 93% 85% 86% 89% 79% 59% 84% 55% 84% 81% 85% 82% 77% 80%

+77 +79 +68 +81TALOOBY GALAXY G121 +0.74 +1.15

67% 76%

-5

79%

NZE10752011M14

-0.1 -1.4 -3.3 +4.5 +42 +65 +100 +93 +9 +1.2 -1.8 +59 +1.8 +0.8 +3.9 -0.4 -1.2

62% 49% 92% 91% 87% 88% 90% 81% 67% 80% 52% 86% 84% 87% 85% 79% 83%

+64 +71 +27 +83TE WHANGA M14 +0.23 +0.17

69% 80%

+29

80%

NXTF53

+4.6 +3.1 -6.7 +3.1 +44 +74 +106 +91 +21 +1.2 -5.4 +58 +6.5 +1.9 +1.3 -0.4 +2.7

66% 56% 93% 94% 91% 92% 91% 81% 70% 87% 59% 85% 84% 87% 84% 79% 83%

+124 +107 +133 +118TWYNAM F53 +0.64 +0.96

69% 75%

+7

75%

NZE13615011491

+0.2 +1.1 -6.6 +5.6 +36 +63 +77 +80 +10 -0.8 -2.0 +35 +7.7 -2.9 -2.9 +2.8 +1.6

72% 59% 94% 92% 88% 88% 90% 83% 71% 73% 56% 87% 85% 88% 85% 79% 84%

+92 +103 +95 +91WAIRERE YNOT Y0491 -0.19 -0.05

70% 80%

-26

81%

NWPG188

+2.6 +3.8 -5.3 +2.2 +56 +102 +132 +120 +20 +3.1 -5.8 +74 +3.9 -0.1 +0.4 -1.3 +2.9

82% 72% 97% 96% 91% 91% 92% 87% 75% 87% 51% 87% 83% 87% 84% 79% 83%

+137 +121 +152 +130WATTLETOP FRANKLIN G188 -0.07 -0.45

71% 79%

+4

77%

Average EBVs for 2015 born calves +103+0.15+0.09+15 -3.8+4.3 +1.6+77 +56+42 +1.7 +0.0+88 +105+0.0 +110+0.3+100 +106+4.6+0.1 -3.7 -0.2 +5

Produced on: Page:123/12/2016

UNDERSTANDING THE ASBP SIRE LISTING - PROGENY PERFORMANCE

This listing provides an indication on how the sires are performing within the ASBP. The values listed canonly be validly used to compare sires within each cohort of the ASBP.

For selection purposes it is strongly advised that the BREEDPLAN EBVs and selection indexes listed insection 1 of the report be used primarily. They are the highest accuracy information to use in selection asthey take into account all available industry data including the data generated from the ASBP. They alsoaccount for information from all known relatives and genetic correlations between traits as well as beingable to be compared across cohorts and the Angus population.

Interpreting the ASBP Progeny Performance Listing

Number of progeny = Number of progeny the sire has recorded for the specified trait. This excludes anyprogeny in single animal contemporary groups.

Progeny Average = The average performance of this sires progeny for the specified trait in the ASBP. Theaverage is calculated using adjusted data (i.e. the standard BREEDPLAN adjustments for the age of theprogeny and age of the dams). It is calculated using a least squares means (LSM) model which takes intoherd and contemporary group.

Rank = The ranking position of the sire within the specified cohort. The ranking order will depend on thetrait. E.g. 200 Day weight ranked in descending order, while birth weight is ranked in ascending order.

The lists are sorted on sire name for the specified cohort.

The date the progeny performance values were produced is listed in the bottom left hand margin of thereport. The reports will be regularly updated as further ASBP data is recorded and analysed.

Progeny Performance Traits and Interpretation

Separate sections for the following traits are included in the ASBP Progeny Performance listing:

Birth Weight: Weight of birth in kilograms recorded on both steer and heifer progeny. Sires are ranked inascending order with lower values indicating lighter birth weight.

Gestation Length: Length of gestation in days recorded on both steer and heifer progeny. Sires are ranked inascending order with lower values indicating shorter gestation length.

200 Day Weight: Weight at 200 days (i.e. weaning weight) in kilograms recorded on both steer and heiferprogeny. Sires are ranked in descending order with higher values indicating more weight.

400 Day Weight: Weight at 400 days (i.e. yearling weight) in kilograms recorded on both steer and heiferprogeny Sires are ranked in descending order with higher values indicating more weight.

600 Day Weight: Weight at 600 days (i.e. 18 month weight) in kilograms recorded on both steer and heiferprogeny. Sires are ranked in descending order with higher values indicating more weight.

Days to Calving: Length of days from bull introduction (i.e. bull in date) to calving. This is recorded on the heiferprogeny for their first joining as yearlings. Sires are ranked in ascending order with lower values indicatingshorter days to calving and improved female reproduction.

Scan Eye Muscle Area (EMA): Eye muscle area in cm2 from ultrasound scanning both steer and heifer progeny ata standard 500 days of age. Sires are ranked in descending order with higher values indicating larger eye musclearea.

Scan Rib Fat: Rib fat in mm from ultrasound scanning both steer and heifer progeny at a standard 500 days ofage. Sires are ranked in descending order with higher values indicating more fat over the ribs.

Scan Rump Fat: Rump (i.e. P8) fat in mm from ultrasound scanning both steer and heifer progeny at a standard500 days of age. Sires are ranked in descending order with higher values indicating more fat over the rump.

Scan Intramuscular Fat (IMF): Percentage of Intramuscular fat from ultrasound scanning both steer and heiferprogeny at a standard 500 days of age. Sires are ranked in descending order with higher values indicating moreintramuscular fat.

Carcase Weight: Weight of the hot standard carcase in kilograms at a standard 750 days of age recorded onsteer progeny. Sires are ranked in descending order with higher values indicating more carcase weight.

Carcase Eye Muscle Area (EMA): Eye muscle area in cm2 in a standard 400 kg carcase measured on steerprogeny. Sires are ranked in descending order with higher values indicating larger eye muscle area.

Carcase Rump Fat: Subcutaneous fat measurement in mm at the P8 rump site in a standard 400 kg carcasemeasured on steer progeny. Sires are ranked in descending order with higher values indicating more rump fat.

Carcase Rib Fat: Subcutaneous fat measurement in mm at the 12th and 13th Rib site in a standard 400 kg carcasemeasured on steer progeny. Sires are ranked in descending order with higher values indicating more rib fat.

Carcase Intramuscular Fat (IMF): Percentage of Intramuscular fat (ether extracted at the UNE meat sciencelaboratory) in a standard 400 kg carcase measured on steer progeny. Sires are ranked in descending order withhigher values indicating more intramuscular fat.

Net Feed Intake (NFI): Feed intake at a standard weight and rate of weight gain recorded on steer progeny atTullimba Research Feedlot. NFI is expressed as kilograms of feed intake per day. Sires are ranked in ascendingorder with lower values indicating better feed efficiency through less feed intake for a standard weight and rateof gain.

Meat Standards Australia (MSA) Marbling Score: Marbling score recorded by the Meat Standards Australia(MSA) grader in the chiller on steer progeny. Sires are ranked in descending order with higher values indicatingmore marbling in the carcase.

Meat Standards Australia (MSA) Ossification: Ossification score recorded by the Meat Standards Australia(MSA) grader in the chiller on steer progeny. Sires are ranked in ascending order with lower values indicatingyounger physiological maturity.

Meat Standards Australia (MSA) Index: The MSA Index is an indication of the overall eating quality of beef fromthe carcase as influenced by a range of factors such as marbling score and ossification. It is generated for steerprogeny from the ASBP based on MSA grading data in the chiller. Sires are ranked in ascending order with highervalues indicating higher eating quality.

Shear Force: Shear Force is a measurement in the kilograms of the force required to pull a mechanical bladethrough a piece of cooked beef from the striploin sample of the ASBP steer progeny. It is measured through theUNE meat science laboratory. Sires are ranked in ascending order with lower values indicating less shear forceand more tender beef.

Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Birth Weight (kg)

Sire Name RankSire ID

Numberof

ProgenyProgenyAverage

ALLOURA GET CRACKING G10 DGJG10 31.236 3

BALD BLAIR DAVID G105 NBBG105 32.835 12

BANQUET GARRETT G272 VONG272 32.633 11

BONNY BROOKE FALCO F32 NUIF32 33.121 14

BOONAROO GRAVITY G13 G013 HCAG013 31.626 4

BOOROOMOOKA GALILEO G501 NGMG501 31.026 2

BURENDA GEIGER COUNTER G49 QBUG49 31.929 5

COFFIN CREEK HORATIO H16 NIWH16 33.320 16

CUDGEGONG PARK GRANGE G4 DPCG4 32.224 8

DWYERS RANGE GATSBY G13 ASRG13 33.626 19

IRELANDS GAPSTED G25 VICG25 33.928 20

MILLAH MURRAH EVIDENT H105 NMMH105 35.420 21

MURRAY UPSHOT H32 NURH32 33.110 14

PATHFINDER GENESIS G357 SMPG357 33.426 17

RENNYLEA G255 NORG255 32.137 6

STRATHEWEN RED DAIQUIRI H40 VSNH40 29.522 1

TALOOBY GALAXY G121 NPGG121 32.227 8

TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 32.834 12

TWYNAM F53 NXTF53 33.420 17

WAIRERE YNOT Y0491 NZE13615011491 32.331 10

WATTLETOP FRANKLIN G188 NWPG188 32.123 6

Produced on: Page: 123/12/2016

Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Gestation Length (days)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 278.832 14





Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - 200 Day Weight (kg)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 208.734 6

TWYNAM F53 NXTF53 207.418 10






Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 317.920 18

TWYNAM F53 NXTF53 325.214 14






Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 510.729 12

TWYNAM F53 NXTF53 514.918 11




Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Days to Calving (heifers) (days)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 297.78 2





Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Scan EMA (sq cm)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 61.927 19





Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Scan Rib Fat (mm)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 6.727 9





Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Scan Rump Fat (mm)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 10.226 4





Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Scan IMF (%)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 5.327 17





Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Carcase Weight (kg)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 415.617 7





Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Carcase EMA (sq cm)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 81.517 16





Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Carcase Rump Fat (mm)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 22.417 3





Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Carcase Rib Fat (mm)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 17.717 10





Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Carcase IMF (%)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 13.017 20





Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - Net Feed Intake (kg/day)


Numberof


ALLOURA GET CRACKING G10 DGJG10 -3.023 14

BALD BLAIR DAVID G105 NBBG105 -3.415 6

BANQUET GARRETT G272 VONG272 -4.116 1

BONNY BROOKE FALCO F32 NUIF32 -3.96 2

BOONAROO GRAVITY G13 G013 HCAG013 -3.311 8

BOOROOMOOKA GALILEO G501 NGMG501 -3.611 4

BURENDA GEIGER COUNTER G49 QBUG49 -3.215 10

COFFIN CREEK HORATIO H16 NIWH16 -3.38 8

CUDGEGONG PARK GRANGE G4 DPCG4 -3.511 5

DWYERS RANGE GATSBY G13 ASRG13 -2.911 16

IRELANDS GAPSTED G25 VICG25 -3.111 12

MILLAH MURRAH EVIDENT H105 NMMH105 -3.17 12

MURRAY UPSHOT H32 NURH32 -2.66 17

PATHFINDER GENESIS G357 SMPG357 -2.49 18

RENNYLEA G255 NORG255 -3.423 6

STRATHEWEN RED DAIQUIRI H40 VSNH40 -2.211 19

TALOOBY GALAXY G121 NPGG121 -1.912 21

TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 -3.016 14

TWYNAM F53 NXTF53 -2.010 20

WAIRERE YNOT Y0491 NZE13615011491 -3.218 10

WATTLETOP FRANKLIN G188 NWPG188 -3.715 3


Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - MSA Marble Score (Score)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 447.417 20





Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - MSA Ossification (Score)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 151.117 17

TWYNAM F53 NXTF53 146.211 11




Angus Sire Benchmarking Project - Progeny PerformanceCohort: 4 - MSA Index (Index)


Numberof



















TE WHANGA M14 NZE10752011M14 63.917 19





UNDERSTANDING THE ASBP SIRE LISTING - PROGENY PERFORMANCE SUMMARY TABLE

This listing provides an indication on how the sires are performing within the ASBP. The values listed canonly be validly used to compare sires within each cohort of the ASBP.

For selection purposes it is strongly advised that the BREEDPLAN EBVs and selection indexes listed insection 1 of the report be used primarily. They are the highest accuracy information to use in selection asthey take into account all available industry data including the data generated from the ASBP. They alsoaccount for information from all known relatives and genetic correlations between traits as well as beingable to be compared across cohorts and the Angus population.

Interpreting the ASBP Progeny Performance Summary Table

Progeny Average = The average performance of this sires progeny for the specified trait in the ASBP. Theaverage is calculated using adjusted data (i.e. the standard BREEDPLAN adjustments for the age of theprogeny and age of the dams). It is calculated using a least squares means (LSM) model which takes intoherd and contemporary group.

Rank = The ranking position of the sire within the specified cohort (in brackets). The ranking order willdepend on the trait. E.g. 200 Day weight ranked in descending order, while birth weight is ranked inascending order.

For easy interpretation colour coding has been applied to the ranking being: Rank 1 to 5 (dark green with white text). E.g.

Rank 6 to 10 (light green with black text). E.g.

The definition of the traits are detailed in the previous section of this report titled “Interpreting the ASBPProgeny Performance Listing”

The table is sorted on sire name for the specified cohort.

The date the progeny performance values were produced is listed in the bottom left hand margin of thereport. The reports will be regularly updated as further ASBP data is recorded and analysed.

Angus Sire Benchmarking Program - Cohort 4

SF Sire ID Name

Summary of Progeny Averages (rank)

BW GL WW YW FW DTCSCANEMA

SCANRIB

SCANRUMP

SCANIMF

CARCWT

CARCEMA

CARCIMF NFI-f

MSAMBL

MSAOSS

MSA IND

31.2 280.1 199.1 327.6 497.1 296.2 65.9 7.1 8.8 6.1 394.7 85.8 17.9 -3.0 570.9 145.3 65.6(3) (19) (18) (12) (19) (1) (3) (3) (13) (2) (17) (4) (2) (14) (2) (8) (2)

DGJG10 ALLOURA GET CRACKING G10

32.8 278.7 205.0 331.0 509.5 307.6 63.2 6.5 9.7 5.8 373.4 85.0 16.9 -3.4 539.9 146.0 64.9(12) (13) (13) (6) (14) (14) (14) (12) (7) (3) (21) (7) (4) (6) (6) (10) (11)

NBBG105 BALD BLAIR DAVID G105

32.6 280.4 207.6 330.1 532.8 305.1 62.1 5.6 7.9 5.2 395.3 81.7 17.0 -4.1 542.3 152.7 64.5(11) (20) (9) (8) (2) (11) (18) (20) (19) (20) (16) (13) (3) (1) (5) (19) (14)

VONG272 BANQUET GARRETT G272

33.1 280.6 207.2 312.7 508.9 307.7 61.5 8.7 11.2 6.2 395.9 77.4 14.3 -3.9 476.7 149.3 64.3(14) (21) (11) (20) (15) (15) (20) (1) (1) (1) (15) (21) (15) (2) (15) (15) (16)

NUIF32 BONNY BROOKE FALCO F32

31.6 276.6 209.6 330.0 522.0 300.0 64.4 6.5 8.9 5.5 408.0 85.4 15.8 -3.3 525.1 146.3 65.0(4) (4) (5) (9) (6) (5) (5) (12) (12) (12) (12) (5) (9) (8) (8) (12) (9)

HCAG013 BOONAROO GRAVITY G13 G013

31.0 275.4 206.7 331.3 521.7 298.5 63.9 6.5 9.5 5.6 422.6 80.1 13.9 -3.6 470.2 163.9 63.8(2) (1) (12) (5) (7) (4) (7) (12) (9) (10) (4) (18) (17) (4) (18) (21) (20)

NGMG501 BOOROOMOOKA GALILEO G501

31.9 278.1 198.4 322.5 510.1 302.8 62.7 6.4 8.6 5.7 400.4 81.0 16.5 -3.2 537.4 138.9 65.5(5) (10) (19) (16) (13) (8) (17) (15) (15) (6) (13) (17) (6) (10) (7) (4) (3)

QBUG49 BURENDA GEIGER COUNTER G49

33.3 276.8 214.3 327.1 516.9 309.4 63.8 5.2 8.0 4.9 391.1 78.4 10.5 -3.3 363.1 139.9 62.6(16) (6) (2) (13) (9) (16) (9) (21) (18) (21) (18) (20) (21) (8) (21) (5) (21)

NIWH16 COFFIN CREEK HORATIO H16

32.2 279.6 203.2 311.0 508.9 304.0 63.8 6.8 10.5 5.5 399.7 81.7 15.9 -3.5 518.0 135.3 65.5(8) (18) (14) (21) (15) (9) (9) (5) (2) (12) (14) (13) (8) (5) (10) (1) (3)

DPCG4 CUDGEGONG PARK GRANGE G4

33.6 276.4 207.7 330.8 515.8 298.3 63.8 6.3 8.2 5.6 410.3 83.9 16.7 -2.9 546.6 149.2 65.2(19) (3) (8) (7) (10) (3) (9) (18) (16) (10) (9) (8) (5) (16) (3) (14) (6)

ASRG13 DWYERS RANGE GATSBY G13

33.9 278.4 207.9 337.2 532.8 310.1 65.9 6.4 9.9 5.8 415.5 83.3 13.9 -3.1 471.2 140.0 64.8(20) (11) (7) (3) (2) (17) (3) (15) (5) (3) (8) (11) (17) (12) (17) (6) (12)

VICG25 IRELANDS GAPSTED G25

35.4 279.4 215.0 334.8 529.2 310.1 66.8 6.8 9.4 5.5 429.3 87.8 15.3 -3.1 508.5 151.8 64.6(21) (16) (1) (4) (5) (17) (1) (5) (10) (12) (2) (1) (11) (12) (11) (18) (13)

NMMH105 MILLAH MURRAH EVIDENT H105

33.1 279.4 199.4 322.6 495.5 332.3 63.6 6.7 6.5 5.3 409.8 81.6 14.0 -2.6 471.7 153.3 64.1(14) (16) (16) (15) (20) (21) (12) (9) (21) (17) (10) (15) (16) (17) (16) (20) (18)

NURH32 MURRAY UPSHOT H32

33.4 275.5 211.6 338.6 530.3 305.1 64.0 7.2 9.4 5.5 432.9 86.9 13.2 -2.4 454.0 137.2 65.0(17) (2) (4) (2) (4) (11) (6) (2) (10) (12) (1) (3) (19) (18) (19) (2) (9)

SMPG357 PATHFINDER GENESIS G357

32.1 278.5 201.8 329.1 519.4 310.7 63.9 6.7 8.1 5.8 423.4 83.9 18.1 -3.4 581.1 146.7 65.7(6) (12) (15) (10) (8) (19) (7) (9) (17) (3) (3) (8) (1) (6) (1) (13) (1)

NORG255 RENNYLEA G255

29.5 276.8 199.3 328.8 501.5 301.3 63.0 6.4 8.7 5.7 390.3 83.8 14.8 -2.2 486.7 150.8 64.3(1) (6) (17) (11) (17) (6) (15) (15) (14) (6) (19) (10) (13) (19) (13) (16) (16)

VSNH40 STRATHEWEN RED DAIQUIRI H40

32.2 279.1 197.6 314.9 498.8 301.9 60.7 6.9 9.7 5.3 408.8 79.6 14.4 -1.9 484.5 138.5 65.1(8) (15) (21) (19) (18) (7) (21) (4) (7) (17) (11) (19) (14) (21) (14) (3) (7)

NPGG121 TALOOBY GALAXY G121

32.8 278.8 208.7 317.9 510.7 297.7 61.9 6.7 10.2 5.3 415.6 81.5 13.0 -3.0 447.4 151.1 63.9(12) (14) (6) (18) (12) (2) (19) (9) (4) (17) (7) (16) (20) (14) (20) (17) (19)

NZE10752011M14 TE WHANGA M14

33.4 277.2 207.4 325.2 514.9 304.1 63.6 6.8 9.8 5.7 418.3 87.2 15.7 -2.0 520.4 146.2 65.1(17) (8) (10) (14) (11) (10) (12) (5) (6) (6) (6) (2) (10) (20) (9) (11) (7)

NXTF53 TWYNAM F53

32.3 277.3 198.1 320.9 492.7 305.3 62.8 5.7 7.8 5.4 383.4 85.3 14.9 -3.2 490.3 143.5 64.4(10) (9) (20) (17) (21) (13) (16) (19) (20) (16) (20) (6) (12) (10) (12) (7) (15)

NZE13615011491 WAIRERE YNOT Y0491

32.1 276.7 213.2 348.2 538.8 313.3 66.3 6.8 10.3 5.7 419.9 82.6 16.4 -3.7 542.8 145.5 65.4(6) (5) (3) (1) (1) (20) (2) (5) (3) (6) (5) (12) (7) (3) (4) (9) (5)

NWPG188 WATTLETOP FRANKLIN G188

Produced on: Page:123/12/2016

Date post:	19-Mar-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	truongdiep
View:	217 times
Download:	1 times

Progeny Performance Report Cohort 4 - Angus Australia · PDF fileProgeny Performance Report...

Documents