+ All Categories

program

Date post: 15-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: malathy-krishnan
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
25
Program outcome:1
Transcript
Page 1: program

Program outcome:1

Page 2: program

Apply knowledge of mathematics,Science,Engineering

fundamentals and core IT Skills in various areas.

Page 3: program

Learner Outcome:

Given a situation our students will be able to identify

the basic knowledge needed to solve the problem,

and apply it to find the solution.

Page 4: program

Performance CriteriaPerformance

IndicatorWeightage Results

Applying Mathematics

Knowledge

University and

Internal Marks25% 15.76

Applying Science

Knowledge

University and

Internal Marks25% 16.41

Applying Engineering

Fundamentals & IT Skills

University and

Internal Marks25% 14.13

Students Feedback

Program Outcome

Feedback from

students

25% 24.06

Percentage

Achieved70.36

Academic Year 2012-2013

Page 5: program

Academic Year 2013-2014

Performance CriteriaPerformance

IndicatorWeightage Results

Applying Mathematics

Knowledge

University and

Internal Marks25% 16.03

Applying Science

Knowledge

University and

Internal Marks25% 11.16

Applying Engineering

Fundamentals & IT Skills

University and

Internal Marks25% 14.86

Students Feedback

Program Outcome

Feedback from

students

25% 22.92

Percentage

Achieved64.97

Page 6: program

The Subjects that have been taken for assessing these criteria are:

Digital signal Processing, Principles of compiler design.

Engineering Economics and Financial Accounting, Data

Structures, Computer Graphics, Operating System, Soft

Computing, Cryptography and network security, Computer

networks, Information theory and coding, Data Structures, Mobile

communication, Principles of communication, Digital Principles

and System Design, Computer Organization and Architecture.

Page 7: program

Rubrics and Scales used

Performance

Indicator

Performance levels (%)

Exemplary Satisfactory Developing

University MarksStudents secured

S,A,B Grade

Students Secured

C Grade

Students secured

D,E & U Grade

Internal test Secured > 74% Secured 59-74%Secured less than

59%

Students

Feedback

Students give Excellent grading in feedback.

Students give Very Good grading in feedback.

Students give Good, Satisfactory and Fair grading in feedback.

Page 8: program

SAMPLE ASSESSMENT

Page 9: program

Performance Criteria 1-Applying Mathematics Knowledge

Mathematics Exemplary(1)

Satisfactory(2)

Developing(3)

2010-2014 Batch students 11/70=15.71 22/70=31.43 37/70=52.86

2009-2013 Batch Students 26/66=39.39 15/66=22.73 25/66=37.88

2008-2012 Batch Students 36/66=54.54 19/66=28.79 11/66=16.67

Average: 36.55 27.65 35.80

1.a.1: University Mark in Digital signal Processing subject

Percentage of Students who scored marks under Exemplary & Satisfactory Category – 64.2%

Page 10: program

Contd…

Applying Mathematics

knowledge

Exemplary Developing Unsatisfactory

Internal Test-I(Q.No:8bi) addressing CO3

24/32= 75.00% 5/32= 15.63% 3/32= 9.40%

Internal Test-II (Q.No:6 -a ) addressing CO4

39/61=63.93 8/61=13.11 14/61=22.95

Average 69.47 14.37 16.18

1.b.1 Internal Test mark for Digital signal Processing Course for 2010-2014 Batch Students

Percentage of Students scored marks under Exemplary & Satisfactory Category – 83.84%

Page 11: program

Performance Criteria 2-Applying Science Knowledge

Mathematics Exemplary(1)

Satisfactory(2)

Developing(3)

2009-2013 Batch students 20/65=30.77 27/65=41.54 18/65=27.69

2008-2012 Batch Students 13/65=20 21/65=32.31 31/65=47.69

2007-2011 Batch Students 29/66=43.94 26/66=39.39 11/66=16.67

Average: 31.57 37.75 29.02

1.a.12: University Mark in Mobile Communication subject

Percentage of Students who scored marks under Exemplary & Satisfactory Category – 69.32%

Page 12: program

Contd…

Applying Science

knowledge

Exemplary Developing Unsatisfactory

Internal Test-I (Q.No:8- a )

addressing CO1

26/42=61.9 5/42=11.9 11/42=26.19

Internal Test-II (Q.No:7 – b ii ) addressing CO5

12/28=42.86 3/28=10.71 13/28=46.43

Average 52.38 11.31 36.31

1.b.12 Internal Test mark for Mobile Communication Course for 2009-2013 Batch Students

Percentage of Students scored marks under Exemplary & Satisfactory Category – 63.69%

Page 13: program

Performance Criteria 3-Applying Engineering Fundamentals & Core IT Skills

Engineering Fundamentals & IT Skills

Exemplary(1)

Satisfactory(2)

Developing(3)

2011-2015 Batch students 10/73=13.7 17/73=23.29 46/73=63.01

2010-2014 Batch Students 7/70=10 26/70=37.14 37/70=52.86

2009-2013 Batch Students 14/66=21.21 26/66=39.39 26/66=39.39

Average: 14.97 33.27 51.75

1.a.13: University Mark in Computer Organization and Architecture subject

Percentage of Students who scored marks under Exemplary & Satisfactory Category – 48.24%

Page 14: program

Contd…

Applying Mathematics

knowledge

Exemplary Developing Unsatisfactory

Internal Test-I(Q.No:8bi) addressing CO3

24/32= 75.00% 5/32= 15.63% 3/32= 9.40%

Internal Test-II (Q.No:6 -a ) addressing CO4

39/61=63.93 8/61=13.11 14/61=22.95

Average 69.47 14.37 16.18

1.b.13 Internal Test mark for Computer Organization and Architecture Course for 2011-2015 Batch Students

Percentage of Students scored marks under Exemplary & Satisfactory Category – 83.84%

Page 15: program

Contd…Assessment for the year 2012-2013Assessment for the year 2013-2014

Page 16: program

Frequency of Assessment &Results Achieved

Page 17: program

aProgramme Outcomes

Performance Criteria

Performance Indicator Subjects Frequency of

assessmentResults Achieved(%)

Apply knowledge of Mathematics, Science, Engineering fundamentals and core IT Skills in various areas

Applying MathematicsKnowledge

University Marks

Digital signal Processing

Once in a Year for University mark

64.2

Engineering Economics & Financial Accounting

70.81

Data Structures76.49

Computer Graphics 66.64

Computer Networks 62.78

Operating System64.79

Principles of Compiler Design 73.74

Information Theory & coding 60.42

Soft Computing53.83

Cryptography and network Security 59.95

Computer Graphics Lab 65.85

University Marks

Page 18: program

Programme Outcomes

Performance Criteria

Performance Indicator Subjects Frequency of

assessmentResults Achieved(%)

Apply knowledge of Mathematics, Science, Engineering fundamentals and core IT Skills in various areas

Applying Science Knowledge

University marks

Mobile Communication

Once in a Year forUniversity mark

69.32

Principles of Communication 65.59

63.9

ApplyingEngineering Fundamentals and Core IT Skills

Digital Principles & System Design 48.24

Computer Architecture

63.9

University Marks(Contd)..

Page 19: program

aProgramme Outcomes

Performance Criteria

Performance Indicator Subjects Frequency of

assessmentResults Achieved(%)

Apply knowledge of Mathematics, Science, Engineering fundamentals and core IT Skills in various areas

Applying MathematicsKnowledge

Internal Marks

Digital signal Processing

Twice in a semester for Internal mark

83.84

Engineering Economics & Financial Accounting

58.41

Data Structures53.78

Computer Graphics 38.22

Computer Networks 87.98

Operating System74.48

Principles of Compiler Design 40.39

Information Theory & coding 66.6

Soft Computing40.95

Cryptography and network Security 59.95

Internal Marks

Page 20: program

Programme Outcomes

Performance Criteria

Performance Indicator Subjects Frequency of

assessmentResults

Achieved(%)

Apply knowledge of Mathematics,

Science, Engineering

fundamentals and core IT Skills in

various areas

Applying Science Knowledge

Internal Marks

Mobile Communication

Twice in a semester for

Internal mark

69.32

Principles of Communication 65.59

63.9

ApplyingEngineering

Fundamentals and Core IT Skills

Digital Principles & System Design 48.24

Computer Architecture

63.9

Student’ s Feedback

Feedback for Programme Outcome from the student

Once in a semester 96.25

Internal Marks and students feedback

Page 21: program

Results Achieved(2012-2013)Performance Criteria Performance Indicator Results Results with weightage

Applying Mathematics

Knowledge

University Marks 65.6215.76

Internal Marks 60.46

Applying Science Knowledge University Marks 67.4616.41

Internal Marks 63.81

Applying Engineering

Fundamentals & IT Skills

University Marks 56.0714.13

Internal Marks 56.97

Students Feedback Program Outcome Feedback

from students

96.25 24.06

Percentage Achieved 70.36

Page 22: program

Results Achieved(2013-2014)Performance Criteria Performance Indicator Results Results with weightage

Applying Mathematics

Knowledge

University Marks ____ 16.03

Internal Marks 64.14

Applying Science Knowledge University Marks ____

11.16Internal Marks 44.63

Applying Engineering

Fundamentals & IT Skills

University Marks ____ 14.86

Internal Marks 59.42

Students Feedback Program Outcome Feedback

from students

97.67 22.92

Percentage Achieved 64.97

Page 23: program

Expected Level Vs Attained Level

PO10

102030405060708090

Expected Level Attained level

Page 24: program

Tools & WeightageProgramme Outcomes

Performance Criteria

Performance Indicator Subjects Tools Used Weightage(%)

Apply knowledge of Mathematics, Science, Engineering fundamentals and core IT Skills in various areas

Applying MathematicsKnowledge

University &Internal Marks

Digital signal Processing

University exam mark Analysis and Internal Test Sample papers

25 %

Engineering Economics & Financial AccountingData Structures

Computer Graphics

Computer NetworksOperating System

Principles of Compiler Design

Information Theory & coding

Soft Computing

Cryptography and network Security

Page 25: program

Tools & Weightage(Contd..)Programme Outcomes

Performance Criteria

Performance Indicator Subjects Tools Used Weightage(%)

Apply knowledge of Mathematics, Science, Engineering fundamentals and core IT Skills in various areas

Applying ScienceKnowledge

University &Internal Marks

Mobile Communication

University exam mark Analysis and Internal Test Sample papers

25 %Principles of Communication

Applying Engineering Fundamentals & IT Skills

Computer Organization and Architecture

25%Digital Principles and System Design

Students Feedback form

Feedback for Programme

outcome from the student

Students Feedback Form 25%


Recommended