+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Programmatic New Source Review

Programmatic New Source Review

Date post: 23-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: adair
View: 38 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Programmatic New Source Review. Malcolm C. Weiss Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1900 Avenue of the Stars Los Angeles, CA 80067 (310) 712-6822 [email protected] 3748292. November 2, 2005. Responsible Agencies. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
18
© Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1 Programmatic New Source Review November 2, 2005 Malcolm C. Weiss Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1900 Avenue of the Stars Los Angeles, CA 80067 (310) 712-6822 [email protected] 3748292
Transcript
Page 1: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

1

ProgrammaticNew Source Review

November 2, 2005

Malcolm C. WeissJeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP

1900 Avenue of the StarsLos Angeles, CA 80067

(310) [email protected]

3748292

Page 2: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

2

Responsible Agencies Federal – U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency (implements CAA, sets goals, national policies and regulatory framework)

State – California Air Resources Board (mobile sources, coordinate with local/federal agencies, state standards, SIP)

Local – Air Quality Management Districts (SCAQMD) (stationary sources, permitting, prohibitory rules, compliance, AQMP, MR&R)

Page 3: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

3

Clean Air Laws Overview 1970 – Fed. Clean Air Act Adopted 1977 – Major Amendment to CAA 1988 – California CAA 1990 – Major New Amendments

Page 4: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

4

1970 Clean Air Act

First major federal air legislation

U.S. EPA created (ARB created in 1967)

Earth Day - April 22, 1970

Page 5: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

5

1970 Clean Air Act (cont.)

Authority delegated to states Establishes National Ambient Air Quality

Standards (NAAQS) State Implementation Plans required Begins national permit programs New Source Review (NSR) States to meet NAAQS by 1975

Page 6: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

6

1977 CAA Amendments

Gives states more time to meet NAAQS

Expands NSR Applicable to new sources Major modifications at existing

facilities Review of NAAQS by 1980 Attainment and Nonattainment areas

Page 7: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

7

1977 CAA Amendments (cont.)

Basic Applicable Requirements Prevention of Significant Deterioration of

Air Quality (Part C) (“PSD”) Plan Requirements for Nonattainment areas

(Part D) (“NSR”)

Page 8: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

8

1990 CAA Amendments Overview

Title I - Attain and maintain NAAQS Title II - Mobile sources Title III - Hazardous air pollutants Title IV - Control acid rain Title V - National uniform permit system Title VI - Stratospheric ozone protection Title VII - Enforcement

Page 9: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

9

1990 CAA Amendments Classifies ozone nonattainment

areas – marginal, moderate, serious, severe, and extreme

Classifications trigger stringency of requirements

Extends attainment dates for extreme areas

Page 10: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

10

CaliforniaThen and Now

1970 California's

population is 20 million

More than 12 million vehicles

VMT is 110 billion miles

2000 California's

population is 34 million

More than 23 million vehicles

VMT is 280 billion miles

Page 11: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

11

Motor Vehicle Impacts

Up to 50% of NOx and VOC (smog) > 50% of hazardous air pollutants 90% CO in urban areas

0102030405060708090

NOx HAP CO

Mobile Sources

Stationary Sources

Page 12: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

12

Air Quality Management Plan SCAQMD

Air Quality Analysis Overall Planning Stationary Sources

SCAG Transportation Growth Management Land Use

ARB Mobile sources Vehicle standards/ fuel Consumer products

Strategies All known control

technologies Technology forcing and

incentives Major technology

breakthroughs

Page 13: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

13

Part D of Title I: Federal NSR

Permits required to construct new or modified major stationary sources

NSR and the permitting process are linked

Expanded opportunity for public comments

Page 14: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

14

Federal NSR (cont.)

New Sources - NSR is triggered only if the emissions make it a major source

Existing Sources - NSR is triggered if the modification significantly increases emissions

Page 15: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

15

Federal NSR (cont.)

Permits to Construct/Operate require that major stationary sources: Install equipment to meet the Lowest Achievable

Emission Rate (LAER) Obtain offsets (ratios) Demonstrate that all major sources under common

ownership/control comply

Page 16: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

16

NSR Reform Reform was urged because of the growing

indication that current regulations hinder, rather than promote improvements in air quality

SCAQMD has filed a lawsuit contesting the reforms

Page 17: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

17

NSR Reform Routine Equipment Replacement Rule (10/27/03).

Equipment replacement is excluded from NSR if: It replaces an existing process unit; with functionally equivalent components; the cost of the replaced is < 20% of the

replacement value of the entire process unit; the basic design of the equipment does not

change; and emissions limits not exceeded.

Page 18: Programmatic New Source Review

© J

effe

r, M

ange

ls, B

utle

r & M

arm

aro

LLP

18

ProgrammaticNew Source Review

November 2, 2005

Malcolm C. WeissJeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP

1900 Avenue of the StarsLos Angeles, CA 80067

(310) [email protected]

3748292


Recommended