Date post: | 25-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | geoffrey-haynes |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
PROGRAMM
ING
MODEL
S &
CONNECTI
ONS
AUGUST 6, 2
010
YOUR FACILITATORS:Kellie Dunn-Poggemann, WISHRM
Secretary & State Director Elect
Helen Englebert, WISHRM State Leadership Director
Linda Johanek, President-Elect , Green Bay SHRM Chapter
2
AGENDA: State Speaker
Database – Kellie Program Assessment
Model – Helen Programming Survey
Review – Linda Next Steps - All
3
NEW PROGRAMMING RESOURCE Resource for ideas, speaker names, and
companies that do presentations Created from prior year State
Conference RFP’s Not secured by an access code Located on the Chapter page of
www.wishrm.org under Other Resources http://www.wishrm.org/Chapters/Presen
tors.aspx
4
DATABASE RESOURCE Information: as submitted for
previous year state conference (i.e. Kalahari 2009)
Each January 1 – next conference proposals will upload
Previous year data will be erased when the new data uploads
5
DATABASE RESOURCE Chapters responsible to make the contact and
ask questions Will they speak at your chapter ? Speaker costs? Travel Costs or other charges, etc.?
Chapters will need to do their own referencesCouncil is not endorsing any one speaker
6
• Chapters are unable to add speakers
• Council may add council members willing to speak
• Unable to edit any information
• If you encounter concerns with using this as a resource please let the council know
7
DATABASE RESOURCE
PROGRAMMING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
An ongoing process of discovering what your program’s participants
want in terms of activities and services.
8
1. Brainstorm Ideas2. Research3. Conduct Focus
Group4. Model5. Survey6. Try it!7. Decide8. Evaluate
9
EIGHT STEP ASSESSMENT MODEL:
Main Functions:
Brainstorm ideas
Choose options Participants
should be members or potential members
Invite people who have ideas, support and enthusiasm
Limit role of focus group
Keep time involved to 1-2 hours
10
USE OF FOCUS GROUPS
GBSHRM SENIOR LEVEL
HR FOCUS GROUP
Selection of ParticipantsInvitation/RSVP ProcessSample Agenda & QuestionsKey FindingsNext Steps
11
15 Chapters participated (Response Rate = 83%)
See Handouts for specific results
Result of recent Programming CLA
Difficulty in finding programming contact for each chapter
Future Item – develop contact list for programming contacts and post on website
12
PROGRAMMING SURVEY:
60%: Securing Quality Speakers
60%: Attracting Senior Level Professionals
60%: Obtaining Strategic Credits
46.7%: Securing Affordable Speakers
40%: Member Engagement
33.3%: Poor Attendance
33.3%: Lack of Time to Network & Socialize
26.7%: Other 20%: Sharing of
Workload Amongst Programming Committee
20%: Meeting Pricing
20%: Cost Control 13.3%: Venue
Issues 13.3%: Meeting
Locations 6.7%: Meeting
Times
13
PROGRAMMING SURVEY : TOP CONCERNS
Chapter Size• 26.7% Small• 53.3% Medium• 20.0% Large
Meeting Times:• 33.3% Breakfast• 26.7% Rotation of
breakfast, lunch & dinner
• 20% Lunch• 20% Rotation of
breakfast and lunch
Reg Meeting Charges:
• 33.3%: $11 - $15• 26.7%: $16 - $20• 20%: Other (varies)• 13.3%: Free• 6.7%: $26 - $30• 6.7%: $31 – 35
Financially:• 40%: Break Even• 33.3%: Combo• 26.7%: Other• 20%: Make Money• 6.7%: Loose Money
14
PROGRAMMING SURVEY: SIZE, TIMES & CHARGES
Programming Responsibility• 46.7% Prog Chair• 26.7% VP• 26.7% Entire Board• 26.7% Other• 13.3% President• 13.3% Pres Elect
Term Limits• 40% One Year• 40% Two Years• 13.3% Other• 6.7% Three Years
80% use committee for programming; 20% do not
15
PROGRAMMING SURVEY: PROGRAMMING RESPONSIBILITY, TERMS & USE OF COMMITTEE
Number Held• 40%: One• 26.7%: Two• 26.7%: None• 6.7%: More than
ThreeDuration:• 40%: Half-Day• 26.7%: N/A• 20%: Full-Day• 20%: Other • 13.3%: Combo of Half
& Full-Day
Member Charge:• 26.7%: N/A• 20%: Depends• 20%: $41 - $60• 13.3%: $61 - $80• 13.3%: $21 - $40• 6.7%: $1 - $20
Financially:• 26.7%: Break Even• 26.7%: Make Money• 20.0%: Other• 13.3%: Loose Money• 13.3%: Combo
16
PROGRAMMING SURVEY: WORKSHOPS
PROGRAMMING SURVEY: SETTING FEES
How do you determine fees for each meeting?
53.3%: Keep same fee, regardless of costs
26.7%: Calculate fee based on costs 26.7%: Other
17
PROGRAMMING SURVEY: MEETING ATTENDANCE
For 2010 to date compared to previous years, how would you characterize
regular meeting attendance?
46.7% About the same 20% Increased 20% Decreased
13.3% Other
18
% of Meetings Receiving HRCI Credits (Gen or Strategic)• 66.7%: 91% -
100%• 13.3%: 31% - 40%• 6.7%: 51% - 60%• 6.7%: 71% - 80%• 6.7%: 81% - 90%
% of Meetings Receiving Strategic HRCI Credits• 33.3%: 11% - 20%• 26.7%: 0 – 10%• 13.3%: 31% - 40%• 6.7%: 21% - 30%• 6.7%: 41% - 50%• 6.7%: 91% - 100%• 6.7%: N/A
19
PROGRAMMING SURVEY : HRCI
Senior level HR programs
Social events Best practices How programming
workload divided RFP’s & Contracts Online
registrations Program
marketing
Top programs from each chapter
Transitional member discounts
Sponsorships Finding speakers Speaker fees Credit card
payments
20
PROGRAMMING SURVEY: ITEMS TO REVIEW
NEXT STEPS: Statewide CLA Calls
How often and when?Who will facilitate?Format?Topics?Guest Speakers?
Use each other as resources? Share chapter meeting marketing materials. National SHRM? Email survey results to Chapter Presidents,
President-Elects & Programming Contacts.
21
22