Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Project Design and Planning
Sequence of Systematic
Project Design
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Problem Analysis
Objectives Analysis
Alternatives Analysis
The sequence of Objectives-Oriented Project Planning (OOPP)
Participants Anal.
1.1.2.2.3.3.
Log. Framework
Plan of OperationsPlan of Operations
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Visualization in Participatory Project Planning (VIPP)
• Make your plan: Visible Readable Changeable Movable
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
PCM Workshop-House Rules
1. Write your own idea on a card.
2. Write only one idea on a card.
3. Describe in a clear and brief sentence.
4. Stick to the facts, and avoid abstraction and generalizations.
5. Write your ideas on the cards before beginning discussion.
6. Obtain a consensus when removing cards from the board.
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
ANALYSISSTAGE
Problems
Analysis
Objectives
Analysis
Stakeholders
Analysis
Alternative Analysis
PLANNINGSTAGE
PDM Plan of Operation
(PO)
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Problem Analysis
• Analyze existing situation
• Identify important problems
• Define core problem
• Draw cause effect relationship Why?
• Why?– Why?
» Why?» Why?
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Problem Tree
Visual representation of the causes and effects of existing negative conditions in the project area and/or sector, in the form of a Problem Tree
1. Select the core problem (focal problem).
2. Identify the direct causes of the core problem.
3. Develop the problem tree downwards (add causes).
4. Identify the direct effects of the core ploblem.
5. Develop the problem tree upwards (add effects).
6. Ensure that “cause-effect” relationships are maintained in the
problem tree.
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Direct Effects
Core Problem
Direct Causes
CORE PROBLEM
CAUSES
EFFECTS
Problem Tree
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Example: Problem Tree
HouseholdIncome
decreases.
FarmersHave to worklong hours.
Rice productivity is low.
Arable land is very limited
Irrigation systemDoes not work
properly
TraditionalFarming methods
are used..
Main facilities are not
well maintained
TerminalFacilities
Are not wellmaintained
FarmersDo not want
To Applyfertilizers
FarmersCannot afford
To buy modern equipment
CAUSES
EFFECTSCore Problem
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
SWOT Analysis
• A SWOT analysis is a subjective assessment of data which is organized by the SWOT format into a logical order that helps understanding, presentation, discussion and decision-making. The four dimensions are a useful extension of a basic two heading list of pro's and con's
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
ST
RE
NG
TH
S
W E A K N E S S E S
INVEST ++Clear matches of strengths and opportunities lead to comparative advantage
DEFEND + -Areas of threat matched by areas of strength indicate a need to mobilize resources either alone or with others.
DECIDE - +Areas of opportunity matched by areas of weakness require a judgement call: invest or divest; collaborate.
DAMAGE CONTROL - -Areas of threat matched by areas of weakness indicate need for damage control or divest.
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Strengths
• Advantages of proposition? • Capabilities? • Competitive advantages? • USP's (unique selling points)? • Resources, Assets, People? • Experience, knowledge, data? • Financial reserves, likely returns? • Marketing - reach, distribution, awareness? • Innovative aspects? • Location and geographical? • Price, value, quality? • Accreditations, qualifications, certifications? • Processes, systems, IT, communications? • Cultural, attitudinal, behavioural? • Management cover, succession?• Philosophy and values?
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Weaknesses
• Disadvantages of proposition? • Gaps in capabilities? • Lack of competitive strength? • Reputation, presence and reach? • Financials? • Own known vulnerabilities? • Timescales, deadlines and pressures? • Cashflow, start-up cash-drain? • Continuity, supply chain robustness? • Effects on core activities, distraction? • Reliability of data, plan predictability? • Morale, commitment, leadership? • Accreditations, etc? • Processes and systems, etc? • Management cover, succession?
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Opportunities
• Market developments? • Competitors' vulnerabilities? • Industry or lifestyle trends? • Technology development and innovation? • Global influences? • New markets, vertical, horizontal? • Niche target markets? • Geographical, export, import? • New USP's? • Tactics: eg, surprise, major contracts? • Business and product development? • Information and research? • Partnerships, agencies, distribution? • Volumes, production, economies? • Seasonal, weather, fashion influences?
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Weaknesses
• Political effects? • Legislative effects? • Environmental effects? • IT developments? • Competitor intentions - various? • Market demand? • New technologies, services, ideas? • Vital contracts and partners? • Sustaining internal capabilities? • Obstacles faced? • Insurmountable weaknesses? • Loss of key staff? • Sustainable financial backing? • Economy - home, abroad? • Seasonality, weather effects?
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
translating SWOT issues into actions under the six categories
Albert Humphrey advocated that the six categories: Product (what are we selling?) Process (how are we selling it?) Customer (to whom are we selling it?) Distribution (how does it reach them?) Finance (what are the prices, costs and investments?) Administration (and how do we manage all this?)
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Environment-Value-ResourcesAnalysis
The Analysis of the external environment in which the institution operates. The result: What programs/services we MIGHT DO, might expand, might try, or might drop ?
– The clarity of vision, values, formulation of mission statement, and development of culture and priorities. “WHAT WE WANT TO DO”
– The analysis of the internal organization, the institution itself its strengths and weaknesses “WHAT WE CAN DO AND CANNOT DO.
– The weighing of these analyses and outputs against each other and the making of strategic decisions and action plans. WHAT WE SHOULD DO.
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Agree on Priorities
• Congruence with the purpose and mission of the organization
• Supports analysis from the SWOT grid
• Ability to draw on existing skills in the organization
• Ability to share resources and coordinate activities with other programs
• Increases organization’s visibility
• Increase network potential
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Participants/Stakeholder Analysis
• Identify Key Persons, groups, institutions, organizations, etc.
• Form categories, beneficiaries, implementors, partners, etc.
• Analyze the groups
• Identify consequences of project
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd
Pro
ject
Man
age
me
nt
Le
arn
ing
Pro
gra
m14
-25
July
200
8, M
eko
ng
Inst
itu
te, K
ho
n K
aen
, Th
aila
nd