Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
School Development and Evaluation Team
Faculty of Education
Data Report (05-06)(Restricted and for Internal Circulation
Only)
School code 64﹕
Wah Yan College, Kowloon
Areas of School Self-Evaluation I. Students’ Performance Indicators from CUHK:
II. Teachers’ Performance Indicators from CUHK :
PI 01: Students’ Quality of School Life
PI 02: Students’ Perception of School Climate
PI 03: Students’ Socio-Economic Status
PI 04: Students’ Perception of Parental Styles
PI 11: Teachers’ Feelings about School Life
PI 13: School Organizational Values
PI 14: Organizational Learning
III. Parents’ Performance Indicators from CUHK :
PI 32: Parents’ Perception of the School
I. Students’ Performance Indicators from CUHK:
PI 01: Students’ Quality of School Life
PI 02: Students’ Perception of School Climate
PI 03: Students’ Socio-Economic Status
PI 04: Students’ Perception of Parental Styles
3.08
2.66
1.83
2.08
2.952.90
3.10
2.99
2.73
2.54
3.16
2.922.99
2.68
1.00
2.00
3.00
Fig. 1a: Students’ Quality of School Life (1)School Mean
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree).
Mean for twenty-five secondary schools
Mean
(Agree)
(Disagree)
(Strongly Disagree)
(*Negative domain)
General Satisfaction
Negative Feeling*
Teacher -Pupil
Relation
Experience in School
Life
Personal Achieve-men
t
Future Oppor-tunities
Social Integration
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Fig. 1b: Students’ Quality of School Life (2)
Student Distribution
(Agree)
(Disagree)
(Strongly Disagree)
(Strongly Agree)
(*Negative domain)
General Satisfaction
Negative Feeling*
Teacher -Pupil Relation
Experience in School Life
Personal Achieve-ment
Future Oppor-tunitie
s
Social Integration
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
3.10
3.003.04
3.25
3.033.06
1.71
1.851.90
1.76
1.901.86
3.08
2.882.88
3.09
2.85
2.91
3.17
3.09 3.113.12
2.99
3.17
2.88
2.752.68
2.80
2.54
2.76
3.26
3.183.163.22
2.99
3.14
3.022.982.99
3.10
2.86
2.98
1.00
2.00
3.00
Mean
(Agree)
(Disagree)
(Strongly Disagree)
(*Negative domain)
General Satisfaction
Negative Feeling*
Teacher -Pupil
Relation
Experience in School
Life
Personal Achieve-men
t
Future Oppor-tunities
Social Integration
Fig. 1c: Students’ Quality of School Life (3)Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree).
Mean of S1 students
Mean of S2 students
Mean of S3 students
Mean of S4 students
Mean of S5 students
Mean of S6 students
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
3.04
2.79
3.11
2.912.85
2.76
3.06
2.69
2.86 2.88
3.19
2.92
2.00
3.00
School Mean
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree).
Fig. 2a: Students’ Perception of the Staff and Students (1)
(Agree)
(Disagree) Principal/
School HeadTeachers Classmates Clerical
StaffTechnicians / Teaching Assistants
Janitors
Mean for twenty-five secondary schools
Mean
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
2.93
2.78
3.16
2.87
3.13
2.87
3.13
2.87
2.94
2.74
2.00
3.00
School Mean
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree).
Fig. 2b: Students’ Perception of Effectiveness of the School (1)
Mean
Learning per se
Teaching Extra-Curricular Activities
Moral & Civic
Education
Physical & Arts
Education
Mean for twenty-five secondary schools
Wah Yan College, Kowloon
(Agree)
(Disagree)
Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Fig. 2c: Students’ Perception of the Staff and Students (2)
(Agree)
(Disagree)
(Strongly Disagree
)
(Strongly Agree)
Principal/ School Head
Teachers Classmates Clerical Staff
Technicians / Teaching Assistants
Janitors
Student Distribution
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Fig. 2d: Students’ Perception of Effectiveness of the School (2)
Learning per se
Teaching Extra-Curricular Activities
Moral & Civic
Education
Physical & Arts Education
Student Distribution
Wah Yan College, Kowloon
(Agree)
(Disagree)
(Strongly Disagree
)
(Strongly Agree)
Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
3.23
2.932.97
3.16
2.85
3.15
3.06
2.98
3.06
3.39
2.95
3.25
2.88
2.73
2.84
3.03
2.71
2.96
3.21
3.08 3.11 3.11
2.81
3.04
2.83
2.64
2.90
2.97
2.71
3.283.25
3.04
3.16
3.34
3.11
3.32
1.00
2.00
3.00
Principal/ School Head
Teachers Classmates Clerical Staff
Technicians / Teaching Assistants
Janitors
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree).
Mean of S1 students
Mean of S2 students
Mean of S3 studentsFig. 2e: Students’ Perception of
the Staff and Students (3)
Mean
Mean of S4 students
Mean of S5 students
Mean of S6 students
(Agree)
(Disagree)
(Strongly Disagree)
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
3.00
2.872.93
2.98
2.872.92
3.32
3.09 3.10
3.31
2.92
3.19 3.17
3.033.08
3.34
2.92
3.32
3.22
3.043.11
3.29
2.94
3.19
3.07
2.89
2.99
3.06
2.71
2.95
1.00
2.00
3.00
Fig. 2f: Students’ Perception of Effectiveness of the School (3)
Learning per se
Teaching Extra-Curricular Activities
Moral & Civic
Education
Physical & Arts
Education
Mean
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree).
Mean of S1 students
Mean of S2 students
Mean of S3 students
Mean of S4 students
Mean of S5 students
Mean of S6 students
Wah Yan College, Kowloon
(Agree)
(Disagree)
(Strongly Disagree)
Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
19.8
7.4
15.0
7.2
25.0
13.8
8.86.7
13.0
30.3
11.615.1
4.6
11.4
0.0 0.82.4
7.1
15.6
5.58.2
4.47.6
5.2
24.7
18.0
0.2 1.5
11.8
20.0
2.14.7
2.1 3.6
27.5
37.2
Fig. 3a: Students’ Socio-Economic Status (1)
%
%
Profes-sionals
Managers/ Executives
Merchants/ Supervisors
Clerks/ Sales-
persons
Skilled workers/
Technicians
Unskilled workers
Farmers/ Fishermen/ Domestic Helpers
Unemployed/ Non-working
Public Service
Providers
Profes-sionals
Managers/ Executives
Merchants/ Supervisors
Clerks/ Sales-
persons
Skilled workers/
Technicians
Unskilled workers
Farmers/ Fishermen/ Domestic Helpers
Unemployed/ Non-working
Public Service
Providers
Father’s OccupationFather’s Occupation
Mother’s OccupationMother’s Occupation
% for the School% for twenty-five secondary schools
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
0.42.2 2.3
7.6 6.4
15.718.6
31.1 29.927.2
10.0
6.1 6.33.1
26.2
6.9
1.03.7 2.9
8.1 7.0
16.7 18.4
29.5
40.0
30.0
11.4
5.7 6.82.8
12.6
3.6
Fig. 3b: Students’ Socio-Economic Status (2)% for the School% for twenty-five secondary schools
%
%
Below Primary
Junior Primary
Upper Primary
Junior Secondary
Senior Secondary
Matricu-lation
University Level
Post-Secondary
Below Primary
Junior Primary
Upper Primary
Junior Secondary
Senior Secondary
Matricu-lation
University Level
Post-Secondary
Father’s Education LevelFather’s Education Level
Mother’s Education LevelMother’s Education Level
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
2.1
6.9
11.7
26.1
15.4
24.6
12.715.3
13.612.0 12.1
5.88.6
3.4
11.1
2.7
12.7
3.2
ReceivingCSSA21.3%
Not receivingCSSA78.7%
ReceivingCSSA12.0%
Not receivingCSSA88.0%
Fig. 3c: Students’ Socio-Economic Status (3)% for the School% for twenty-five secondary schools
%
< $ 5K $10-15K
$15-20K
$20-30K
$30-40K
>70K$40-50K
$50-70K$ 5-10K
Family’s Total Monthly IncomeFamily’s Total Monthly Income
Receiving Government Financial Assistance (CSSA Scheme)Receiving Government Financial Assistance (CSSA Scheme)
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
66.1
32.8
8.7 11.7 10.1 8.0
0.2 2.2
14.9
44.1
0.0 1.1
94.086.6
0.4 2.4 4.4 8.41.2 2.7
Fig. 3d: Students’ Socio-Economic Status (4)% for the School% for twenty-five secondary schools
%
%
Private Housing (owned)
Home Ownership
Scheme
Private Housing(rental)
Share Flat (rental)
Public Housing
Temporary Housing
Living with Father, Mother, Brother(s)
and Sister(s)
Living with Father, Brother(s)
and Sister(s)
Living with Mother, Brother(s)
and Sister(s)
Living with other relatives
Residential TypeResidential Type
Family CompositionFamily Composition
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
2.0 2.4
22.3
15.5
51.7
45.3
16.4
24.4
4.58.4
2.3 2.8 0.8 1.3
0.0 1.2 0.0 1.6 1.3 2.1 2.4 3.6
96.391.6
Fig. 3e: Students’ Socio-Economic Status (5)% for the School% for twenty-five secondary schools
%
%
1 year or below
2-3 years
4-5 years
6-7 years
Others
No. of Family Members (incl. student)No. of Family Members (incl. student)
Students Newly Arrived from ChinaStudents Newly Arrived from China
2 or below
3 4 5 6 7 8 or above
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
-1.00
-2.00
-3.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
-1.00
-2.00
-3.00
SES Index Distribution of our school
SES Index Distribution of 40 schools
Fig. 3f: Students’ Socio-Economic Status (6)
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
Degree of T
ightnessD
egree of Tightness
Degree of AcceptanceDegree of Acceptance
Indulgent
Authoritarian (Power-assertive)
Authoritative-reciprocal (High in bi-
directional communication)
Neglecting
(Ignoring & Uninvolved)
Fig. 4a: Students’ Perception of Parental Styles (1)
High
Low
Low High
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
25.4
33.030.5
21.1 20.3 20.723.9 25.1 %
Fig. 4b: Students’ Perception of Parental Styles (2)
% for the school
% for twenty-five secondary schools
Neglecting (Ignoring & Uninvolved
Indulgent Authoritarian (Power-assertive)
Authoritative-reciprocal
(High in bi-directional communication)
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
1.5
23.9
1.7
28.8
1.5
18.8
1.7
22.2 %
Fig. 4c: Students’ Perception of Parental Styles (3)
% of outliers% of others
Note: Outliers at 2 s.d. or more
Neglecting (Ignoring & Uninvolved
Indulgent Authoritarian (Power-assertive)
Authoritative-reciprocal
(High in bi-directional communication)
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
2.63.6 3.6
5.8 6.0
3.8
7.5
5.35.8 5.5
4.5
1.9 1.9
3.0
5.54.7
3.9
1.3
5.56.2
4.13.2
4.3
0.6
%
Neglecting (Ignoring & Uninvolved
Indulgent Authoritarian (Power-assertive)
Authoritative-reciprocal
(High in bi-directional communication)
% of S1 students
% of S2 students% of S3 students
Fig. 4d: Students’ Perception of Parental Styles (4)
% of S4 students
% of S5 students
% of S6 students
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
II. Teachers’ Performance Indicators from CUHK:
PI 11: Teachers’ Feelings about School Life
PI 13: School Organizational Values
PI 14: Organizational Learning
4.65
4.50
5.06
4.08
4.57
3.92
4.23
3.63
2.82
3.57
3.91
4.52
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Teacher Commitment
Job Satisfaction
Sense of Community
Students’ Order and Discipline
Job Pressure
Workload
Fig. 11a: Teachers’ Feelings about School Life (1)
(Agree)
(Slightly Disagree)
(Slightly Agree)
(Disagree)
School Mean
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree).
Mean for twenty-five secondary schools
Mean
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Fig. 11b: Teachers’ Feelings about School Life (2)
(Agree)
(Disagree)
(Strongly Disagree)
(Strongly Agree)
Job Satisfaction
Sense of Community
Students’ Order and Discipline
Job Pressure
Workload
(Slightly Disagree)
(Slightly Agree)
Teacher Distribution
Teacher Commitment
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
4.75
4.35
5.05 5.08
4.594.49
4.29
4.06
2.792.92
3.84
4.15
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Teacher Commitment
Job Satisfaction
Sense of Community
Students’ Order and Discipline
Job Pressure
Workload
Fig. 11c: Teachers’ Feelings about School Life (3)
(Agree)
(Slightly Disagree)
(Slightly Agree)
(Disagree)
Mean of Male
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree).
Mean of Female
Mean
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
3.00
4.00
5.00
Teachers' Personal Values (TPV) 3.72 3.01 4.97 4.62 4.72 4.81 4.86 5.07
School's Espoused Values (SEV) 3.89 3.15 4.48 4.32 4.58 4.41 4.72 4.93
FormalityBureaucratic
Control
Participationand
CollaborationCollegiality Clarity of Goals
Communicationand Consensus
ProfessonalOrientaton
TeacherAutonomy
Fig. 13a : School Organizational Values (1)
(Agree)
(Slightly Disagree)
(Slightly Agree)
Mean
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree).
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
3.00
4.00
5.00
TPV (My School) 3.72 3.01 4.97 4.62 4.72 4.81 4.86 5.07
SEV (My School) 3.89 3.15 4.48 4.32 4.58 4.41 4.72 4.93
TPV (All Sec Sch) 4.33 3.97 5.07 4.94 5.08 5.09 5.04 4.93
SEV (All Sec Sch) 4.31 4.08 3.90 4.06 4.25 4.01 4.36 4.19
FormalityBureaucratic
ControlParticipation and
CollaborationCollegiality Clarity of Goals
Communicationand Consensus
ProfessonalOrientaton
TeacherAutonomy
(Agree)
(Slightly Disagree)
(Slightly Agree)
Fig. 13b : School Organizational Values (2)
Mean
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree).
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
TPV (Male) 3.69 3.03 4.95 4.68 4.69 4.81 4.89 5.01
SEV (Male) 3.88 3.14 4.54 4.38 4.62 4.51 4.80 4.98
TPV (Female) 3.80 2.95 5.05 4.46 4.82 4.78 4.79 5.24
SEV (Female) 3.91 3.18 4.29 4.13 4.43 4.10 4.44 4.75
FormalityBureaucratic
ControlParticipation and
CollaborationCollegiality Clarity of Goals
Communicationand Consensus
ProfessonalOrientaton
TeacherAutonomy
(Agree)
(Slightly Disagree)
(Slightly Agree)
Fig. 13c : School Organizational Values (3)
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree).
Mean
(Disagree)
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
4.24 4.184.28
3.80
4.44
4.04
4.254.13
4.26
3.93
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
School Mean
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Never) to 6 (Often).
Fig. 14a: Organizational Learning (1) Mean for twenty-five secondary schools
Personal Mastery
Mental Model
Shared Vision
Team Learning
Systems Thinking
(Frequent)
(Sometimes)
(Few)
(Rare)
Mean
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Fig. 14b: Organizational Learning (2)
(Never)
(Often)
(Frequent)
(Sometimes)
(Few)
(Rare)
Personal Mastery
Mental Model
Shared Vision
Team Learning
Systems Thinking
Teacher Distribution
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
4.244.32 4.37
4.30
4.54
4.374.30 4.26 4.31 4.27
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Mean of Male
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Never) to 6 (Often).
Fig. 14c: Organizational Learning (3) Mean of Female
Personal Mastery
Mental Model
Shared Vision
Team Learning
Systems Thinking
(Frequent)
(Sometimes)
(Few)
(Rare)
Mean
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
PI 32: Parents’ Perception of the School
III. Parents’ Performance Indicators from CUHK:
4.57
4.08
2.34
3.27
4.90
4.28
3.994.11
4.30
4.17
4.99
4.10
4.44
3.94
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Fig. 32a: Parents’ Perception of the School (1)
Mean
School Mean
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree).
(Slightly Agree)
(Agree)
(Slightly Disagree)
(Disagree)
(*Negative Domain)
School Effectiveness
Study Pressure*
School Ethos
Parent-School Collaboration
Student Care
School Facilities
Students’ Sense of
Belonging
Mean for twenty-five secondary schools
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Parents’ Distribution
(Agree)
(Disagree)
(Strongly Disagree
)
(Strongly Agree)
(Slightly Agree)
(Slightly Disagree)
Fig. 32b: Parents’ Perception of the School (2)
(*Negative Domain)
Wah Yan College, Kowloon
School Effective
-ness
Study Pressure*
School Ethos
Parent -School
Collaboration
Student Care School Facilities
Students’ Sense of Belonging
Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
4.69
4.47
4.56
4.63
4.47
4.64
2.22
2.39
2.32
2.24
2.57
2.34
5.08
4.82
4.96
4.84
4.69
5.04
4.29
3.92
4.07
3.883.84 3.85
4.38
4.19
4.40
4.29
4.22
4.32
5.10
4.98 4.98
5.06
4.86
4.95
4.49
4.36 4.38
4.55
4.41
4.47
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Mean of Parents of S1Mean of Parents of S2
Mean of Parents of S3
Mean of Parents of S4
Mean of Parents of S5
Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree).
Fig. 32c: Parents’ Perception of the School (3)
Mean of Parents of S6
Mean
(Slightly Agree)
(Agree)
(Slightly Disagree)
(Disagree)
(*Negative Domain)
School Effectiveness
Study Pressure*
School Ethos
Parent-School Collaboration
Student Care
School Facilities
Students’ Sense of
Belonging
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”
PI No. Title Area Count
01 Quality of School Life S1-S6 Students 544
02 Students' Perception of School Climate S1-S6 Students 554
03 Social Economic Status S1-S6 Students 539
04 Parental Styles S1-S6 Students 539
11 Teachers’ Feelings about School Life All Teachers 49
13 School Values Inventory All Teachers 49
14 School Organizational Learning All Teachers 49
32 Parents’ Perception of the School All Parents 516
Appendix: “Performance Indicators” Survey Record
Wah Yan College, KowloonProject of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”