PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT

Cooperation Collaborative project (IP)

260070 ID4EV FP7-2010-ICT-GC (Information and Communication Technologies)

2012-Jan-31 Page 1 of 83

PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT

Grant agreement no.: 260070

Project acronym: ID4EV

Project title: Intelligent Dynamics for fully electric vehicles

Funding Scheme: Collaborative Project (CP) - Large-scale integrating project (IP)

Latest version of Annex I against which the assessment will be made:

Version 1.6

Periodic report: 2nd

Periodic Report

Period covered: from M10 to M18 (01. March 2011 - 30. November 2011)

Project co-ordinator name: Dr. Patrick Spall

Project co-ordinator organization: Continental Engineering Services GmbH

Phone: +49 69 67869 6093

Fax: +49 69 67869 6070

E-mail: [email protected]

Project website address: www.id4ev.eu

Date of preparation: 31. January 2012

Version: 1.0



2012-Jan-31 Page 2 of 83

Declaration by the scientific representative of the project coordinator

I, as scientific representative of the coordinator of this project and in line with the obligations as stated in Article II.2.3 of the Grant Agreement declare that:

The attached periodic report represents an accurate description of the work carried out in this project for this reporting period

The project (tick as appropriate)1:

has fully achieved its objectives and technical goals for the period

o has achieved most of its objectives and technical goals for the period with relatively

minor deviations

o has failed to achieve critical objectives and/or is not at all on schedule.

The public Website, if applicable:

is up to date

o is not up to date

To my best knowledge, the financial statements which are being submitted as part of this report are in line with the actual work carried out and are consistent with the report on the resources used for the project (section 3.6) and if applicable with the certificate on financial statement.

All beneficiaries, in particular non-profit public bodies, secondary and higher education establishments, research organisations and SMEs, have declared to have verified their legal status. Any changes have been reported under section 5 (Project Management) in accordance with Article II.3.f of the Grant Agreement.

Name of scientific representative of the Coordinator: ............Patrick Spall............................ Date: .....2012......./ .....January......./ .....31....... Signature of scientific representative of the Coordinator: ................................................................

1 either of these boxes is ticked, the report should reflect these and any remedial actions taken.



2012-Jan-31 Page 3 of 83

Table of Contents – list of chapters

1. Publishable Summary .................................................................................................... 5

2. Project Objectives for the Period .................................................................................... 7

3. Work Progress and Achievements during the Period ...................................................... 9

3.1. Overview of the progress of the work ...................................................................... 9

3.2. Description of Work Progress for each work package ............................................12

3.3. Project Management ..............................................................................................39

3.3.1. List of Beneficiaries .............................................................................................41

3.3.2. Consortium management tasks and achievements .............................................42

3.3.3. Project planning and status .................................................................................49

4. Deliverables and Milestones Tables ..............................................................................51

4.1. Overview of Adherence to Plan of Deliverables ......................................................51

4.2. Overview of Adherence to Plan of Work documents ...............................................54

4.3. Overview of Adherence to Plan of Milestones ........................................................56

4.4. Internal and external project Co-operation ..............................................................57

4.4.1. Internal Meetings ................................................................................................57

4.4.2. Conference Calls ................................................................................................59

4.4.3. Workshop ...........................................................................................................62

5. Explanation of the Use of the Resources .......................................................................64

5.1. Overview of actual allocated Resources versus estimates .....................................64

5.2. Overview of actual allocated Costs versus estimates .............................................72

6. Certificates ....................................................................................................................83

Table of Contents – list of tables

Table 1 - Work progress description of Workpackage WP 2 .................................................15





Table 6 - List of Beneficiaries ...............................................................................................41



2012-Jan-31 Page 4 of 83



Table 9 - Project planning and status (Gantt chart) ...............................................................50

Table 10 - Deliverables Table ...............................................................................................54

Table 11 - Work documents .................................................................................................55

Table 12 - Milestones ...........................................................................................................56

Table 13 - Internal Meetings .................................................................................................59

Table 14 - User.....................................................................................................................62

Table 15 - User.....................................................................................................................63

Table 16 - Actual and estimated Efforts per Activity Type per Beneficiary for the full project

period (in person-month) ......................................................................................................65

Table 17 - Actual and estimated Efforts per Activity Type per Beneficiary for the full project

period (in person-month) ......................................................................................................67

Table 18 - Actual and estimated Efforts per Activity Type per Beneficiary for the Period (in

person-month) ......................................................................................................................69

Table 19 - Actual and estimated Efforts per Activity Type per Beneficiary for the Period (in

person-month) ......................................................................................................................71

Table 20 - Actual and estimated Costs per Activity Type per Beneficiary for the full project

duration (in EURO) ...............................................................................................................72


duration (in EURO) ...............................................................................................................72


duration (in EURO) ...............................................................................................................73

Table 23 - Actual and estimated Costs per Activity Type per Beneficiary for the Period (in

EURO) .................................................................................................................................73


EURO) .................................................................................................................................74


EURO) .................................................................................................................................75

Table 26 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for fka for the Period .......77

Table 27 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for RENAULT for the

Period ...................................................................................................................................77

Table 28 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for ZF for the Period ........78

Table 29 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for IDIADA for the Period 79

Table 30 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for CTHA for the Period ..79

Table 31 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for NOVTNO-T for the

Period ...................................................................................................................................79

Table 32 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for ICOOR for the Period 80

Table 33 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for Conti Auto for the

Period ...................................................................................................................................80

Table 34 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for Conti Temi for the

Period ...................................................................................................................................82

Table 35 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for UNIMORE for the

Period ...................................................................................................................................82



2012-Jan-31 Page 5 of 83

1. Publishable Summary

The objective of the Intelligent Dynamics for fully Electric Vehicles (ID4EV) project is to develop brake

and chassis systems for the needs of sole electric driven vehicles. Development and optimization on

vehicle level is done with a new approach of a network system also including adapted HMI concepts.

Current development projects and efforts for electrified vehicles primarily focus on cost and weight

reduction of electric drive train components and energy storage systems as well as on extending

operating range. The development of energy efficient and lightweight electrified auxiliaries also has to

be taken into account for a successful introduction of full electric vehicles (FEV). Besides energy

consumption and recuperation, the safety aspect is absolutely relevant for the redesigned systems.

Active safety, robustness and comfort of FEVs have to be on the same high level as with conventional

combustion engine vehicles. Electric systems and the E/E-architecture have to be designed fail safe to

ensure safe and predictable driving.

Re-engineering of existing driver assistance systems has to be done to fit control strategies, sensors

and actuators to the individual design of full electric vehicles.

The objective of the ID4EV project is to develop energy efficient and safe brake plus chassis systems

for full electric vehicles. The goal is to adapt and improve active safety and comfort systems to FEVs.

Beside the development and optimization of FEV drive train relevant systems with regard to active

safety & comfort and the brake & chassis systems, optimization on vehicle level is done using a new

approach of a network system as well as new HMI concepts for FEVs.

Electrified auxiliaries like the brake systems and the chassis lead to new possibilities for vehicle

control and a better cooperative interaction between these distributed systems. For a fast introduction

of full electric vehicles these systems have to be robust and must have a defined fail safe concept.

The aim is to provide thoroughly designed and tested electrified brake and chassis systems that lead

to a high user/ customer acceptance. To reach this safety approach the target is to adapt existing

systems to the requirements of full electric vehicles. The project focuses on the topics of energy

efficiency, safety and the interaction between the vehicle, the optimized systems and the driver.

Thus the ID4EV project is split into three main areas of research and development. The first one deals

with the development of adapted braking systems for electric driven vehicles (IB4EV – Intelligent

Brakes for fully Electric Vehicles), the second research area covers all aspects concerning chassis

components for non-combustion engine powered vehicles (IC4EV – Intelligent Chassis for fully Electric

Vehicles) and the third field of interest functional integration and the human machine interaction are

treated (IF4EV – Intelligent Functionality for fully Electric Vehicles).

IB4EV goes beyond the state of the art by applying electro-mechanical brakes to the front axle of a

front wheel driven FEV, thus enabling a clear management and force distribution between friction and

electrical recuperative braking without implications to the driver pedal feel. The recuperation potential

depending on the kind of driving cycle is calculated to be an improvement of 12 to maximal 20% in

reference to today’s technology.

With IC4EV new cost efficient technological approaches are done especially with respect to safety

architecture, harness, and in-wheel motor design. Therefore unused synergies of the braking system,

the electric drive and the vehicle suspension are exploited by making a top-down system design

optimizing the overall unsprung mass and system performance.



2012-Jan-31 Page 6 of 83

Within IF4EV the major issue is to integrate all major vehicle component/ system controls into one

operating interface. The driver shall have the choice between different vehicle system behaviors to

enjoy certain comfort-, functionality- and performance levels depending on the route, the trip reason or

the personal situation for example. Balancing these conflicting requirements can never be optimal so

optimization has to be achieved through on the spot configuration of relevant vehicle components in

form of an intelligent function management.

To reach a significant breakthrough of full electric vehicles the adapted systems are tested on test

benches and under real world conditions in demonstrator vehicles to ensure the functionality and to

prove the safety requirements.

The project’s goal is to develop innovative FEV power train concepts according to the increasing

necessity of safety and environmental sustainability. It does not disregard road safety issues and

customer’s acceptance in order to facilitate the penetration of the emerging market for electric

vehicles. Thus ID4EV is addressing the following issues.

• Increased overall power and energy efficiency of FEVs through information and communication

technology (ICT) solutions for optimized architecture, integration, controls, systems and components,

given current and anticipated constraints in terms of energy storage systems.

• Strengthened global competitiveness of the European automobile sector, including the components

and systems suppliers and contribution to the creation of knowledge-based jobs in a sector of strong

economic impact for Europe.

• European leadership in the move towards the electrification of mobility and transport of goods and

passengers.

The project “Intelligent Dynamics for fully Electric Vehicles” is a platform to bundle well-known,

powerful European partners of different sectors coping with present and future automotive technology.

The team ID4EV consists of eight partners from five European member states.

• Vehicle manufacturer (Renault)

• Automotive suppliers (Continental, ZF)

• Engineering partner (IDIADA)

• Research communities (fka, Chalmers University, TNO, ICOOR)



2012-Jan-31 Page 7 of 83

2. Project Objectives for the Period

A growing number of fully electric vehicles will be introduced into the European and global market in

the coming years offering a high potential for long-term reduction of CO2-emissions and the “greening”

of road transport.

Current development efforts are mainly focused on cost and weight reduction of electric drive trains

and energy storage systems as well as on extending the operating range of full electric vehicles. Apart

from addressing these economic and technical roadblocks, customer acceptance has to be taken into

account. Full electric passenger cars will only be accepted by the consumers if the (active) safety- and

the comfort level of the new vehicle concepts are equal or better in comparison to what is offered in

today’s conventional vehicles. At the same time energy efficiency and best possible recuperation is

demanded from potential users. Full electric vehicles have a big potential for even increasing the

active safety and comfort as well as driving pleasure. Electric motors can be faster controlled than

modern combustion engines by vehicle dynamic controllers and driver assistance systems.

Figure 1 - ID4EV and its goals in the context of distinguishable automotive megatrends

The aim of the project is to adapt all relevant systems for the active safety and comfort to the new

challenges of full electric vehicles. Therefore research and development (R&D) on the braking system,

the suspension system and the operation control system including the Human-Machine-Interface

(HMI) is done.

Project objective of this second third of the project duration strongly focuses on implementation of the

work package results in IB4EV, IC4EV and IF4EV gained at the first nine months. Mainly this has been

a state of the art analysis of existing electrically driven vehicles and related technologies, e.g. drive

train components, control methods and driver assistant systems. In addition end user needs and legal

aspects have been identified as the basis for technical requirements for by wire brake systems,

chassis systems and network communications for electrically propelled passenger cars.

In “Intelligent Brakes for fully Electric Vehicles (IB4EV)” a front-wheel driven demonstrator vehicle on



2012-Jan-31 Page 8 of 83

the basis of the Renault Fluence Z.E. with a central electric engine is modified. For this project period

the goal of having the components and subsystems designed, tested and partially integrated has been

fully achieved. Major mechanical systems are the electro-mechanic brake at the front axle and the re-

designed drum brakes at the rear axle.

Figure 2 - IB4EV system development process

In short, the design of the mechanical parts is to be finalized and prototypes have to be fabricated.

Braking software for vehicle dynamics and recuperation needs to be modified to the drive train

configuration and to multiple vehicle parameters. Additional effort has to be spent on the brake pedal

feeling for the driver because of the changeover at brake blending.

In “Intelligent Chassis for fully Electric Vehicles (IC4EV)” three fields of investigation are being pushed.

First, this is driving comfort for electric vehicles with higher unsprung masses. Therefore a half-vehicle

test bench is outlined and a second demonstrator vehicle is equipped with adaptive damping

technology. A safety concept for E/E chassis components is processed including an error handler

within the drive control unit. The third field of investigation then is on durability of E/E chassis

components regarding misuse mechanical, electrical and mechatronical situations.

In “Intelligent functionality for fully Electric Vehicles (IF4EV)” implementation of software, hardware and

mechanical vehicle cockpit components to one interacting unit using an intuitively human machine

interface (HMI) is on the agenda. Important content of the HMI is a profile manager to individualize

vehicle behavior and the navigational control.

Chassis & SafetySystems & Technology

ID4EVDevelopment Process

1 / Dr. Thomas. Raste / 2011-09-15 © Continental AG

Subsystem /

Component

System

Level

Vehicle

Level

System

Test

System

Integration

Test

Subsystem

Test

Specification, Design,

Implementation

Integration, Test,

Application

D 3.1

D 3.2 D 3.3

D 3.4

D 3.5



2012-Jan-31 Page 9 of 83

3. Work Progress and Achievements during the Period

3.1. Overview of the progress of the work

For full electric vehicles (FEV) the development of efficient brake and chassis systems is of big

importance to gain the customer’s acceptance. FEV’s with an intelligent control network, which is

adapted to the user needs, will further increase customer acceptance as these systems do contribute

to an improvement of active safety and comfort. Given these advantages a faster introduction of FEV's

into the market is possible.

Therefore the objective of ID4EV is to develop chassis and brake systems as well as integrated

network solutions for electro-mobility use cases, which match with the current state of the art systems

and even outperform them. To reach the project goals within 27 months time duration and at high

quality at reasonable investment the ID4EV project work is set up modular.

ID4EV is structured into 7 work packages:

WP01: covering the project administration and coordination

WP02: defines the requirements and specifies the functions and system behavior

WP03 (IB4EV): dedicated to the development of electro-mechanical brake systems

WP04 (IC4EV): dealing with the development of advanced suspension systems

WP05 (IF4EV): defines the intelligent network control and the user friendly interface (HMI)

WP06: contains the verification and validation actions

WP07: comprises all the dissemination activities in the project including planning of the final

event

Major Achievements

In accordance with the aforementioned overall project objectives the second periodic annual report

summarizes the major activities from project month nine to project month 18 inclusively in a bullet

point style, whereas detailed work explanation plus results are given in the description of the work

packages.

WP1: Project Management (Conti)

Task 1.1: Financial project reporting showed to be more complex and time consuming than estimated.

Project management and controlling are assisting the partner s in the project internal reporting

activities.

Task 1.2: Continental Engineering Services is in charge to organize and/ or to assist in the

organization of internal meetings, to coordinate official appointments and to review official documents

internally.

Task 1.3: The project management has to monitor progress of the internal tasks and time lines. The

work package leaders are involved in evaluating technical content to ensure correctness of the

working documents and deliverables that are made public.

Task 1.4: No activities started yet on the final report.

WP2: Requirements and Specifications (fka)

Task 2.1: Studies regarding the expected capabilities of future fully electric vehicles, customer user

needs and legislative requirements have been carried out.

Task 2.2: A benchmark of existing fully electric and hybrid electric vehicles has been finished.

Task 2.3: The requirement document including use cases on brake-by-wire-systems was completed

and made available to the partners.

Task 2.4: The component and function tree of a regenerative brake system has been elaborated and



2012-Jan-31 Page 10 of 83

conjointly consolidated.

Task 2.5: Definition of the individual requirements for chassis systems has been finished. Final

documentation has been finished end of project month 12.

Task 2.6: End user requirements and future homologation plus legislative requirements have been

analyzed. The network architecture has been derived from the defined uses cases and the identified

requirements.

Task 2.7: Work on the vehicle simulation model and vehicle state estimator for control development is

done. A series of studies has been carried out and results have been presented.

WP3: Intelligent Brakes for fully Electric Vehicles (Conti)

Task 3.1: Benchmarks on two hybrid vehicles (Honda Insight, Toyota Prius) and one fully electric

vehicle with conventional brakes (Renault Fluence) have been performed.

Task 3.2: System requirements and the E/E-architecture for the electro-mechanical brake system are

done. The task is finished successfully.

Task 3.3: Development of the brake-by-wire system; Design and production of the brake system is

finalized. The task is finished successfully.

Task 3.4: The brake system has been mechanically integrated. Control strategies for recuperation and

energy management have been implemented. The task is finished successfully.

Task 3.5: Clinic studies have been performed to verify the calculated brake pedal feeling at brake

blending. Progress is on time and to the expectations of the researchers.

Task 3.6: The concept of the intelligent motion control concept has been refined. The focus was on the

so called “Cooperative Motion Control” between friction brake and electric motor during anti-lock brake

system intervention. Very good results have been achieved. A computer simulative benchmark of the

controllers is in preparation. .

Task 3.7: A detailed functioning and a component tree of the regenerative brake system have been

mapped. A hazard analysis in accordance to the ISO 26262 is ongoing.

Task 3.8: The brake system has been successfully build up and integrated into the target vehicle. First

summer and winter road tests have been performed.

WP4: Intelligent Chassis for fully Electric Vehicles (ZF)

Task 4.1: The state of the art analysis plus documentation has been completed.

Task 4.2: The basic design of a half-vehicle test bench has been finalized. A demonstrator vehicle

has been fitted with adaptive dampers, sensors and the necessary controllers. .

Task 4.3: Durability test of E/E chassis components also including cables and plugs started. The

engine and the engine housing design have been finished.

Task 4.4: A hazard analysis on vehicle dynamics has been performed and a FMEA is being started.

The electric control unit for the electric motor will be extended by an error handler.

WP5: Intelligent Functionality by cooperative interaction for fully Electric Vehicles (IF4EV)

(Conti)

Task 5.1: The requirements for the system components are defined and released.

Task 5.2: The final versions of the HMI interaction concept and of the profile specifications are

released.

Task 5.3: For the navigational software and the HMI software a working pre-release is available. A

test bench for pre-integration investigations outside the vehicle has been build..

Task 5.4: No activities started yet according to the project schedule.

Task 5.5: Software implementation for charging spot updates and range calculation including

integration to the navigation functionality is done.


WP6: Test and evaluation (Renault)

Task 6.1: Using a simulator the acceptance of an individually adjustable recuperation rate by the

driver has been investigated and documented. The task has been finished successfully in project



2012-Jan-31 Page 11 of 83

month 12.

Task 6.2: The target vehicle, a Renault Fluence Z.E., is running with the by wire controlled electro

mechanical brakes at the front axle. At test rides the data gained by computer simulation have been

validated. The task has been finished by project month 18.

Task 6.3: In close cooperation with Renault, Idiada and Continental the new brake system has been

investigated and validated in every detail. Every component and sub-system was looked at in regard

to braking performance and recuperation.

Task 6.4: Using a simulator the (partially) breakdown of E/E components and systems is simulated in

a safe and reproducible environment.

Task 6.5: Renault and Continental are running two test vehicles. A modified, fuel powered Renault

Megane and a Fluence Z.E.. The gained test data indicate good progress of the implementation and

adjustment activities for the electric vehicle drive train and the controllers.


WP7: Dissemination (fka)

Task 7.1: An exploitation plan for the ID4EV project partners and the project results has been

initiated.

Task 7.2: The ID4EV internet presence is constantly being updated and maintenance service is being

provided. Visits to the website and its content are regularly analyzed.

Task 7.3: Outcome of the ID4EV project has been presented to expert audience e.g. at the Aachen

Colloquium and the SIA conference in Mulhouse and at European symposia at Brussels and Berlin.

Task 7.4: Dissemination planning of several project documents is supported. Organization for the final

review and the final event started with beginning of the last third of the project phase.



2012-Jan-31 Page 12 of 83

3.2. Description of Work Progress for each work package

Work package no. WP 2 Plan-Start: M01 Plan-End: M17

Lead Participant fka Actual-Start: M01 Actual-End: M17

Work package title Requirements and Specifications

Activity Type Research activities

Participant involved IDIADA, ZF, fka, Conti Auto, UNIMORE, RENAULT, Conti Teve, NOVTNO-T, CTHA

Work package summary of progress towards objectives

Work on WP2 has been finalized during the second PAR period. Tasks 2.1 to 2.6 have been completed in M12. The results have been documented in deliverable D02.1 which has been presented to the European Commission and the reviewers during the first review meeting in May 2011. Work on task 2.7 has been finished in M17 and results have been documented in a paper which has been presented to an international professional audience at the 20th Aachen Colloquium in October 2011.

Resources allocated / Plan vs. Actual Plan (period) Actual (period) Plan (total) Actual (total)

Please refer for resource details to task reports. 12.65 14.12 38.25 37.76

Task no. Task 2.1 Activity: Research Plan-Start: M01 Plan-End: M12


Task title Analysis of user needs

Participant involved

IDIADA, ZF, fka, Conti Auto, UNIMORE

Progress of work The work on task 2.1 has been finished during this reporting period. The work results have been documented in Deliverable 2.1 which has been submitted to the European Commission. Work on task 2.1 focused on the analysis of user needs. Therefore potential customer groups for fully electric vehicles have been identified and there specific requirements on suchlike vehicles have been analyzed. This did not only include propulsion and range requirements but included the requirements on HMI and driver assist systems. This work has been completed by analysis current and future legislative requirements on fully electric vehicles.

Justification of Resources allocated / Plan vs. Actual

Plan (period) Actual (period) Plan (total) Actual (total)

1.38 1.35 5.5 5.48

fka (M10-M12): work on task finalized, results documented in D2.1 (0.1PM) ZF (M10-M12): Collection of user needs (driving scenarios) (1PM) Conti Auto (M10-M12): Review of deliverable D02.1 done (0.25PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 13 of 83



Task title State of the art analysis


IDIADA, ZF, fka

Progress of work The work on task 2.2 has been finished during this reporting period. The work results have been documented in Deliverable 2.1 which has been submitted to the European Commission. Work on task 2.2 included a benchmark of existing electric vehicles and studies on consumption and autonomy of battery electric vehicles. Additionally the effect of new propulsion systems on advanced driver assist systems, controller strategies and HMI systems have been analyzed.



1.23 1.25 4.5 4.5

fka (M10-M12): work on task finalized, results documented in D2.1 (0.25PM) ZF (M10-M12): Research of state of the art of electric vehicles (1PM)


Lead Participant RENAULT Actual-Start: M02 Actual-End: M12

Task title Definition of requirements and specifications for brake-by-wire systems


IDIADA, RENAULT, fka, Conti Teve, UNIMORE

Progress of work Task 2.3 Definition of requirements and specifications for brake-by-wire systems has been finished successfully. User needs and preferences are collected and analyzed. The braking system, which is needed to fulfill the selected use cases, has been defined. The results have been used for Deliverable 3.1.



1.84 0.99 6.75 6.77

fka (M10-M12): work on task finalized, results documented in D2.1 (0.75PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): Definition of generic brake-by-wire brake system (0.24PM)


Lead Participant Conti Teve Actual-Start: M02 Actual-End: M12

Task title Definition of requirements and specifications for brake system including recuperation (system level)


IDIADA, fka, Conti Teve

Progress of work Task 2.4 Definition of requirements and specifications for brake system including recuperation has been finished successfully. The braking system, the components and the test cases have been defined. The results have been used for Deliverable 3.2.

Justification of Resources allocated / Plan (period) Actual (period) Plan (total) Actual (total)



2012-Jan-31 Page 14 of 83

Plan vs. Actual 0.75 0.34 2.75 2.37

fka (M10-M12): work on task finalized, results documented in D2.1 (0.1PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): Definition of new brake system (0.24PM)


Lead Participant ZF Actual-Start: M02 Actual-End: M12

Task title Definition of requirements and specifications for chassis systems


IDIADA, ZF, fka

Progress of work The work on this task has been finished during this reporting period. The main work was the creation of the chassis chapter of the requirements document. Part of the creation of the chassis chapter was:

Collection of user needs (driving scenarios) for the chassis chapter. (T2.1)

Research of state of the art of electric vehicles for chassis chapter. (T2.2) The results have been documented the chassis chapter in the requirements document "Deliverable 2.1" which has been submitted to the European Commission.



1.7 4.33 6.25 6.31

fka (M10-M12): work on task finalized, results documented in D2.1 (0.6PM) ZF (M10-M12): Collection and definition of the chassis requirements and creation of chassis chapter of the Requirements Document (3.73PM)


Lead Participant Conti Auto Actual-Start: M04 Actual-End: M12

Task title Definition of requirements and specifications for network communication


fka, Conti Auto, Conti Teve

Progress of work Task 2.6 Definition of requirements and specifications for network communication has been finished successfully. A cooperative driver interface has been defined. Content for D02.1 was provided in time.



0.75 0.76 2.5 2.73

fka (M10-M12): work on task finalized, results documented in D2.1 (0.45PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): Definition of cooperative driver interface (0.31PM)


Lead Participant NOVTNO-T Actual-Start: M02 Actual-End: M17

Task title Integrated functionality for vehicle dynamics performance and safety


NOVTNO-T, CTHA, fka

Progress of work



2012-Jan-31 Page 15 of 83

In this final period the vehicle simulation model of Chalmers is completed with electrified components from TNO and brake actuator system from Continental. Chalmers' MPC controller is applied for various configurations of front and rear regenerative braking and wheel load distribution. TNO's Vehicle State Estimator (VSE) has been integrated in the simulation model, and is validated for several driving maneuvers including mu-split. Various result of MPC controller and VSE have been presented at the Aachener Colloqium in October 2011, and a report for project internal use is written, which includes the validation of the simulation model with data from the Fluence and results of control application, extended with respect to the presentation at the Aachener Colloqium. The task has been completed.



5 5.1 10 9.75

fka (M10-M12): Supporting project partners in their efforts to identify vehicle behavior using simulations (0.05PM) fka (M13-M15): Supporting project partners in their efforts to identify vehicle behavior using simulations; Review of preliminary results during several conference calls. (0.15PM) fka (M16-M18): Supporting project partners in their efforts to identify vehicle behavior using simulations; Review of results during a meeting in Aachen. (0.25PM) NOVTNO-T (M10-M12): VSE adaptation to the simulation model of Chalmers and integration of the VSE software in the model library (0.56PM) NOVTNO-T (M13-M15): Teleconference, VSE update to latest Chalmers simulation model (0.31PM) NOVTNO-T (M16-M18): Finalizing the report on Task 2.7 (0.33PM)

Table 1 - Work progress description of Workpackage WP 2



2012-Jan-31 Page 16 of 83



Work package title Intelligent Brakes for fully Electric Vehicles


Participant involved IDIADA, Conti Teve, ZF, NOVTNO-T, CTHA, RENAULT, UNIMORE


The overall progress of the Work Package WP3, IB4EV, is on time and budget. Milestone M2 "End of system integration phase IB4EV - Demonstrator vehicle built" (M16) has been reached. The brake system with two floating-caliper by-wire electro-mechanical brakes on the front axle and hydraulic drum brakes on the rear axle have been integrated successfully into the demonstrator vehicle with central electric motor. Additionally a first version of the Vehicle State Estimator software has been implemented and integrated into the demonstrator vehicle. The integration and testing activities were supported by partners Renault and TNO and have been documented in the deliverable D3.3. The status of the tasks in the period M10-M18 is described in the following: Task 3.2: System- and E/E-Architecture for Brake System (M04-M12) - The task has been finished. Task 3.3: Design and Production of Brake System (M01-M15) - The task has been finished. Task 3.4: Recuperation and Energy Management with Brake System and Central Electric Motor (M06-M17) - The task has been finished. Task 3.5: HMI-Topics of Brake Systems (M06-M21) - The task is ongoing. Task 3.6: Intelligent Motion Control (M06-M24) - The task is ongoing and needs to be extended from M24 to M27 due to benchmarking of controllers in simulation (TNO, Chalmers, Conti). Task 3.7: Safety Concept for Brake Systems (M07-M24) - The task is ongoing and needs to be extended from M24 to M27 due to WP4 subtask shift from Task 3.2 to Task 3.7. Task 3.8: Integration, Testing and Release of Brake System (M07-M27) - The task is ongoing.


Please refer for resource details to task reports. 51.23 49.19 115 79.26



2012-Jan-31 Page 17 of 83


Lead Participant IDIADA Actual-Start: M01 Actual-End: M07

Task title State of the Art Analysis of Brake Systems


IDIADA, Conti Teve

Progress of work completed



0 0 8.5 8.03



Task title System- and E/E-Architecture for Brake System


ZF, Conti Teve

Progress of work In this task the system requirements of the brake system with zero-drag and regenerative braking torque blending capability, its architecture, boundary conditions and features for the ID4EV project has been described. The results of the task are reported in the deliverables D3.1, D3.2 and the working document WD3.1.



1.67 0.75 4 2.8

ZF (M10-M12): Nothing to do in this period. (0PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): New brake system specified (0.75PM) For the whole task less effort was spent than planned. The task is successfully completed.



Task title Design and Production of Brake System


IDIADA, Conti Teve

Progress of work In this task a brake-by-wire system has been developed which is capable to support regenerative braking of a fully electric vehicle. In normal operation the vehicle's motor can recover nearly all deceleration energy, but the friction brake comes into play only if greater deceleration is required. The brake system consists of two electro-mechanical floating-calipers with parking brake capability at the front axle and a hydraulic circuit with master cylinder, ESC (Electronic Stability Control) modulation unit and drum brakes at the rear axle. The brake system is cost effective, because a vacuum booster and an electric vacuum pump is not required.



2012-Jan-31 Page 18 of 83

A great challenge was to provide a pedal feel characteristic which is as close to the standard booster-assisted pedal feeling as possible. The pedal feel could be managed by attaching a volume consuming element in the hydraulic circuit with a purpose-built elastomer material. Another challenge was to keep the maximum pedal force for full braking on a low level. To meet this challenge a drum brake lining material with increased C* value has been used. The application specific software for normal brake, parking brake and stability functions has been designed and implemented. The software is embedded in the ESC hardware unit and the two WCU (Wheel Control Unit) hardware of the electro-mechanical brake at each front wheel. The results of the task are reported in the deliverable D3.3 and in a conference paper worked out by the partners Renault and Continental.

Figure 3 - WP3 Brake System Components



7.4 7.49 18.5 15.43

IDIADA (M10-M12): Continued development of simulation tool to compare different regeneration concepts (0.5PM) IDIADA (M13-M15): Working on the simulation development tool. Integration of different driving cycles which allows to evaluate the potential regenerative energy. (2PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): New brake system developed (2.37PM) Conti Teve (M13-M15): Development of a brake-by-wire system (2.62PM) Task is successfully completed.



2012-Jan-31 Page 19 of 83



Task title Recuperation and Energy Management with Brake System and Central Electric Motor


NOVTNO-T, CTHA, IDIADA, RENAULT, Conti Teve

Progress of work Energy recuperation in fully electric vehicles is mainly limited by the requirement to preserve vehicle stability but it is also dependent on the brake system design and the ability of the control system. The boundaries of vehicle stability are difficult to assess, and must be approached with care, e.g. when maximizing the regenerative braking during cornering on slippery surfaces. For development of a torque blending strategy state-of-the-art control approaches and numerical simulation work have been used to investigate combined maximization of energy recuperation and vehicle yaw stabilization. An MPC (Model Predictive Control) algorithm provided by estimated signals calculated from a VSE (Vehicle State Estimator) has been used. The promising results are documented in a conference paper worked out by the partners TNO and Chalmers. Particular attention is paid to the ESC system. If there is a tendency for the vehicle to become unstable, the amount of regenerative braking is reduced. All the time, the blending of braking torques has to be without any uncomfortable feeling to the driver, i.e. almost unnoticed. The RBF (Regenerative Brake Function) realizing the torque blending could be tested successfully in a technology mule car and will be put into service in the fully electric demonstrator vehicle during winter 2011/2012.

Figure 4 - WP3 Regenerative Brake Function



8.67 8.91 13 11.37



2012-Jan-31 Page 20 of 83

RENAULT (M13-M15): Renault worked with partners for the energy management strategy. (0.5PM) IDIADA (M13-M15): Simulation of different driving cycles and analyzing the recuperation rate for each cycle. (0.3PM) NOVTNO-T (M10-M12): Some minor adjustment of the VSE, activities on recuperation postponed Aachen paper is completed (0.04PM) NOVTNO-T (M13-M15): Meeting at Conti, preparations for Brake Blending strategy simulation (0.8PM) NOVTNO-T (M16-M18): Strategies developed on a simulation level, actual system properties will be taken into account in T3.6 intelligent motion control (considers recuperation strategy) (2.67PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): Brake system software configured (0.6PM) Conti Teve (M13-M15): First application of brake system software (0.87PM) Conti Teve (M16-M18): Brake system software integrated and tested (0.95PM)


Lead Participant ICOOR Actual-Start: M06 Actual-End: M21

Task title HMI-Topics of Brake Systems


IDIADA, Conti Teve, UNIMORE

Progress of work In this period the activities of this task has been carried out by our third party UNIMORE. In particular the following activity has been accomplished: - Data for pedal characteristics verification have been collected in Renault Fluence fully electric demonstrator vehicle. - a State Of the Art investigation regarding regenerative braking feeling and comfort has been done.



5.06 2.96 9 3.14

IDIADA (M13-M15): Comparing pedal feel results of different vehicles and preparing data for the comparison with the simulation. (0.2PM) IDIADA (M16-M18): Deliver pedal feel data from the Benchmark performed in T3.1 for comparison with the simulator (0.2PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): Pedal characteristics verification (0.09PM) Conti Teve (M13-M15): Pedal characteristic (0.03PM) Conti Teve (M16-M18): Nothing to do in this period (0PM) UNIMORE (M10-M12): According to the amendment, parte of the activities of the task have been anticipated to the first months of the years. In particular: o Design of the HMI of the regenerative braking system to be installed on the driving simulator; o Webex meeting with WP3 and WP6 partners (in particular, Renault, Continental and Chalmers) and face to face meeting in Paris to define the specification of the brake circuit (1PM) UNIMORE (M16-M18): SOA investigation regarding regenerative braking feeling and comfort (1.44PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 21 of 83



Task title Intelligent Motion Control


RENAULT, IDIADA, CTHA, NOVTNO-T, Conti Teve

Progress of work In this period the concept of Intelligent Motion Control has been refined. The focus of this work is on the so called Cooperative Motion Control between friction brake and electric motor during ABS (Antilock Brake System) intervention. The design and implementation of this algorithm is ongoing. The VSE could be successfully integrated into the fully electric demonstrator vehicle.

Figure 5 - WP3 Vehicle State Estimator



19.18 19.3 43.5 25.98

RENAULT (M13-M15): Renault worked with the partners in order to have the standard value of deceleration. The results of the tests in Aubevoye were consistent with the expected assessment. (0.5PM) IDIADA (M10-M12): Testing of Renault Fluence, Analysis and Report generation. Results used to validate vehicle models and friction estimator in WP2.7 (3.5PM) NOVTNO-T (M10-M12): Completion of the VSE concept and study of SDRE controller for various drive train configurations (2.21PM) NOVTNO-T (M13-M15): Experiments with TNO test vehicle for data gathering, VSE concept tuning on test data as preparation for Fluence ZE application (1.7PM) NOVTNO-T (M16-M18): Minor preparation work, focus mainly on Task 3.4 (0.03PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): Motion Control concepts defined (2.79PM) Conti Teve (M13-M15): First concepts of motion control (2.58PM) Conti Teve (M16-M18): Motion Control software design in progress (2.9PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 22 of 83



Task title Safety Concept for Brake Systems


RENAULT, Conti Teve

Progress of work A hazard analysis for the Cooperative Motion Control function is in progress.

Figure 6 - WP3 Cooperative Motion Control



3.25 3.08 7.5 3.68

RENAULT (M13-M15): Renault was involved in the safety management. (0.5PM) ZF (M16-M18): Preparation and Meeting with Conti for Safety Interface between near wheel electric drive and brake system (0.13PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): Hazard analysis started (0.66PM) Conti Teve (M13-M15): Function and component tree definition (0.87PM) Conti Teve (M16-M18): Hazard analysis in progress (0.92PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 23 of 83



Task title Integration, Testing and Release of Brake System


RENAULT, Conti Teve

Progress of work Continental together with partner Renault carried out the integration of the brake system into the fully electric demonstrator vehicle. The integration steps have been accompanied by subsystem and integration tests verifying the correct integration and documenting the performance level of the brake system.

Figure 7 - WP3 Brake System Integration



6 6.7 14 8.83

RENAULT (M13-M15): The supported Continental for the brake system integration in the Fluence EV demo car. (0.5PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): New brake system integrated (2.33PM) Conti Teve (M13-M15): System integration (1.97PM) Conti Teve (M16-M18): Brake system integration tests finished (1.9PM)




2012-Jan-31 Page 24 of 83



Work package title Intelligent Chassis for fully Electric vehicles


Participant involved fka, ZF, IDIADA, Conti Teve


- Task 4.2 Driving comfort: - Ongoing Evaluation of available adaptive dampers started. Basic design of half-vehicle test rig has been finalized. Demonstrator vehicle has been fitted with adaptive dampers, sensors and the necessary controllers. The vehicle has been analyzed to improve simulation accuracy. - Task 4.3 Durability of E/E chassis components: - Ongoing Definition of misuse test scenarios for the damper simulation done Simulation of misuse tests with additional unsprung mass ongoing. Design of cable bending test bench, plugs and engine finished. Cable Bending test bench is set up and cables are prepared. Engine and plugs are in production. - Task 4.4 Safety concept for E/E chassis components: - Started Implementation the drive functionality and error handler into the drive control computer is ongoing. First draft of FMEA done. FMEA ongoing. First draft of safety test bench tests done. Inverter and engine in production.





Task title State of the art analysis


fka, ZF




0 0 4 5.07



2012-Jan-31 Page 25 of 83



Task title Driving comfort


fka, ZF, IDIADA

Progress of work The demonstrator vehicle used to evaluate ride comfort has been fitted with adaptive dampers, sensors and the necessary controllers. The vehicle has been analyzed in detail to improve simulation accuracy and the results have been integrated in the simulation models. A test schedule has been arranged with all involved consortium partners and necessary arrangements and preparations have been made.



20.35 15.25 47 23.08

fka (M10-M12): simulation efforts for driving comfort evaluation and test rig design (0.5PM) fka (M13-M15): Limited efforts on driving comfort during this period. Mainly focused on simulations and model building. (0.5PM) fka (M16-M18): taking vehicle measurements, improving simulation models, simulation efforts (2.5PM) ZF (M10-M12): Calculation and analysis of original damper characteristics (2.53PM) ZF (M13-M15): Planning and design of adaptive dampers. (3.07PM) ZF (M16-M18): Preparation of Test Car and Measurement of Original and CDC Dampers. (6.15PM)



Task title Durability of E/E chassis components


fka, ZF, IDIADA

Progress of work Definition of misuse test scenarios for the damper simulation Selection of cables and plugs for the durability tests. Housing and engine design is in progress Assortment of the required tests and in progress. Simulation of misuse tests with additional unsprung mass. Design of cable bending test bench started. Housing and engine design is in progress. Cables for testing have been chosen and ordered. Design of cable bending test bench finished. Design of high voltage plugs also ready. Cable Bending test bench is set up and cables are prepared. Engine housing and engine design is done. The engine is in production.



16.13 15.53 43 21.25

fka (M10-M12): planning of durability simulations and durability tests (1PM) fka (M13-M15): Simulations have been done to evaluate misuse load cases. (2.5PM) fka (M16-M18): coordinative efforts and test rig design (0.25PM) ZF (M10-M12): Harness and plug design. Detailed definition of the test scenarios (1.26PM) ZF (M13-M15): Planning and design of cable bending test bench (3PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 26 of 83

ZF (M16-M18): Harness, Plug, Engine and Test Bench design and preparation. (6.27PM) IDIADA (M13-M15): Finalization of environmental test plan for in-wheel electric motor to be conducted at IDIADA in conjunction with ZF and FKA. (0.5PM)



Task title Safety concept for E/E chassis components


fka, ZF, Conti Teve

Progress of work Hazard and risk analysis and item definition. Design of the software architecture of the drive control computer. Analysis of available test benches. Assortment of available inverters. Implementation the drive functionality into the drive control computer. Planning of safety test bench. First draft of DFMEA done. Electric Twist Beam finished and presented. Design of safety test bench started. First draft of safety test bench tests done. Inverter for the Safety Test bench was developed and is in production. Engine housing and engine design is done. The engine is in production. FMEA started.



12 24.5 33 27.3

fka (M10-M12): minor efforts on safety analysis (0.5PM) fka (M13-M15): FMEA efforts of partners have been supported. (0.5PM) fka (M16-M18): FMEA analysis and supporting project partners (1.5PM) ZF (M10-M12): Hazard and risk analysis and item definition. Design of the software architecture of the drive control computer. Analysis of available test benches. (6.23PM) ZF (M13-M15): A safety concept for E/E chassis components was started. Planning of inverter for the safety test bench. (9.29PM) ZF (M16-M18): Design and Development of inverter for the safety test bench. FMEA preparation (5.53PM) IDIADA (M16-M18): Development of first draft of IDIADA FMEA document for review with ZF (0.75PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): Task has not been started yet (0PM) Conti Teve (M13-M15): System definition (0.1PM) Conti Teve (M16-M18): Meeting with ZF (0.1PM)




2012-Jan-31 Page 27 of 83



Work package title Intelligent Functionality by Cooperative Interaction for fully Electric Vehicles


Participant involved fka, NOVTNO-T, Conti Auto, Conti Temi, Conti Teve, UNIMORE, ICOOR


From M9 to M18 the implementation of software, HMI and hardware was done. Several telcos concerning the Profile Manager, Navigation Control and HMI implementation took place. In addition workshops as face to face meeting took place: 1. 12.07.-14.07.2011 HMI implementation workshop 2. 30.08.-01.09.2011 System integration workshop 3. 18.10.-19.10.2011 Test Navigation and Range Calculation 4. 03.11.2011 System integration workshop Profile Manager and Range Problem Solver 5. 09.11.2011 System integration workshop Navigation Control 5. 15.11.2011 System integration workshop Navigation Control 6. 17.11.-18.11.2011 System integration workshop HMI The finalization of all SW Modules will take some more time, so that the end of Task 5.3 was postponed to M20. This will have no impact on the planned deliverable and milestone.





Task title Requirements engineering for system components


fka, NOVTNO-T, Conti Auto, Conti Temi




0 0 10 10



Task title Concept development


fka, NOVTNO-T, Conti Auto, Conti Teve, Conti Temi, UNIMORE




0 0 17.9 15.47



2012-Jan-31 Page 28 of 83



Task title HW, SW, algorithm and HMI implementation


fka, ICOOR, Conti Auto, Conti Temi, UNIMORE

Progress of work After 3 month the definition of Navigation Control and Power Tracer were reviewed. A pre-release of the navigation software and the HMI software was available. CarPC, Gateway and Micro-Autobox HW were available for system integration in the test bench. The system test bench for system integration and test outside the vehicle was available after 6 month.

Figure 8 - System test bench WP5 First software releases of 1. Navigation Control 2. Range Calculation 3. Profile Manager 4. Power Tracer 5. Range Problem Solver 6. HMI are available and have been tested during the System Integration Workshop in Babenhausen. The results out of this workshop are input for the further implementation in the next months. The HMI Styleguide for all screens and profiles is available:



2012-Jan-31 Page 29 of 83

Figure 9 - Travel Main Menu Main menu "Travel"

Figure 10 - City Main Menu Main menu "City"



2012-Jan-31 Page 30 of 83

Figure 11 - Main Menu Fun Main menu "Fun" In the last 3 month further improvements in all SW modules and HMI implementation were achieved. The status of the different SW modules is: 1. Navigation Control 70% 2. Range Calculation 70% 3. Profile Manager 100% 4. Power Tracer 100% 5. Range Problem Solver 70% 6. HMI 70%

Figure 12 Current status system integration in Cockpit with running navigation



2012-Jan-31 Page 31 of 83

Figure 13 Menu example: Settings & Information

Figure 14 Menu example: Current power consumption Because of the complex communication between all SW modules, technical problems with VAPS XT for the HMI development and interface problems to third party software, the finalization of the SW modules will take some more time. This will have no influence on the planned deliverable and milestone.



61.2 56.17 63 62.75

fka (M10-M12): - development Range Calculation algorithm - development Navigation Control algorithm - first hardware implementation and testing of hardware components - documentation (4.2PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 32 of 83

fka (M13-M15): - Algorithm development Range Calculation in Matlab/Simulink - Simulation and verification of Range Calculation on Autobox - Algorithm development Navigation Control - Testing of Navigation Control on Car-PC - Documentation (4.2PM) fka (M16-M18): Implementation of Range Calculation algorithm in Matlab/Simulink Implementation and documentation of Navigation Control software Implementation and documentation of TCP/IP communication Implementation of CAN-Bus communication Integration of Sina navigation core in Navigation Control software (3.6PM) NOVTNO-T (M13-M15): Implementation plan discussions with fka (0.1PM) ICOOR (M16-M18): Collaboration with UNIMORE researcher for the following activities: Development of HMI within VAPS - MyProfile section; - Current Consumption section; - Limp Home section; (1.75PM) Conti Auto (M10-M12): Implementation of SW and HW ongoing (6.28PM) Conti Auto (M13-M15): HW, SW, algorithm and HMI implementation ongoing. Test bench available. First system integration WS performed. (9.14PM) Conti Auto (M16-M18): HW development finalized SW development Range Problem Solver 70% achieved HMI style guide development finalized (6.54PM) Conti Temi (M10-M12): - setup the evaluation HW for SW- and system-testing - development and integration of the gateway base SW - allign the HW/SW interfaces between the main components - setup the SDD for profile manager and CRB services - application development started (6.19PM) Conti Temi (M13-M15): - implementation of the application interfaces - implementation of the power consumer energy calculation - design / implementation of the commuter mode detection - implementation of the profile manager - first integration of the problem solver and range calculation application - integration of Gateway in the WP5 test bench - participating on several WP5 workshops (4.78PM) Conti Temi (M16-M18): Adaptation of the Power Tracer function, adapt communication matrix of the gateway, support system integration, refining of the commuter mode (3.16PM) UNIMORE (M10-M12): - training on VAPS XT tool, necessary to implement the HMI application; - integration of CAN messages into VAPS XT, in order to acquire data related to vehicle status; - development of the application manager component within the HMI application; - start of screen layout implementation. (1PM) UNIMORE (M13-M15): During the period UNIMORE has implemented the Center Stack HMI: - Implement Business Logic: the state machine has been modified according to the specification given; - Screen layout implementation: the layout of the HMI screens has been updated in terms of GUI components and transitions among screens - Graphic implementation: starts of the implementation of the HMI graphics in terms of “look & feel” and user interaction; - Update CAN interface: revision, update and testing of the Vector CAN interface, through CANCase XL HW and relevant .dll developed within the project. (1.68PM) UNIMORE (M16-M18): In collaboration with ICOOR we have develop the Human Machine Interface within VAPS. In particular we worked on the: - MyProfile section; - Current Consumption section; - Limp Home section. (3.55PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 33 of 83



Task title Demonstrator


fka, NOVTNO-T, Conti Auto, Conti Temi, UNIMORE

Progress of work not started yet



0 0 31 0



Task title Pre-evaluation


fka

Progress of work 1. Integration of charging spot list in Sygic Software: additional software for automatical conversion of charging spot list from Google Earth into Sygic Software implemented. 2. Testing of Range Calculation algorithm on Autobox: software integrated and tested on Autobox during test at ika as well as integration workshop at Continental. 2. Testing of Navigation Control software: software integrated and tested at ika on normal notebook as well as on the car pc at Continental. 3. Testing of CAN-Bus communication: DLL for CAN-Bus communication implemented and tested. This is also integrated and tested on the car pc at Continental during integration workshops. 4. Testing of TCP/IP communication: DLL for TCP/IP communication implemnted and tested. This is also integrated and tested on the car pc at Continental during integration workshops.



2 2 2 2

fka (M10-M12): work on task not started yet (0PM) fka (M13-M15): Integration of SI-NA navigation core (1PM) fka (M16-M18): Integration of charging spot list in Sygic Software Testing of Range Calculation algorithm on Autobox Testing of Navigation Control software Testing of CAN-Bus communication Testing of TCP/IP communication (1PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 34 of 83


Lead Participant Conti Auto Actual-Start: Actual-End:

Task title Test and Evaluation


Conti Auto




0 0 5.5 0




2012-Jan-31 Page 35 of 83



Work package title Test and Evaluation


Participant involved RENAULT, CTHA, ICOOR, Conti Teve, UNIMORE, IDIADA


The objective of WP 6 is the evaluation of the braking system in typical driving scenarios. The system will be compared to conventional systems on series production reference vehicles for the assessment of standard requirements. To evaluate the innovative features of the new system, additional procedures are developed. Two methods are available to test the system in driving conditions:

The driving simulator is used for virtual testing. The main advantages are repeatable tests in identical environmental conditions and save testing of hazardous events without risk to the driver or a test vehicle.

The prototype vehicle build within ID4EV project, a modified Renault Fluence EV equipped with the developed innovative brake system, is now available for winter testing. Integrating the modifications in the test vehicle has been a time consuming process since development of the base vehicle was still under way.

Thanks to the cooperation of all team members, both test set-ups are available for testing and the evaluation of the innovative brake system will be completed by the end of the project.


Please refer for resource details to task reports. 42 32.75 90 45.86


Lead Participant CTHA Actual-Start: M01 Actual-End: M12

Task title Implementation of driver performance simulation models


RENAULT, CTHA, ICOOR, Conti Teve, UNIMORE

Progress of work During this period the two scenarios intended for the upcoming user clinic for evaluation of HMI and interaction of driver and regenerative braking were designed, implemented and tested in the driver simulator. The work was documented in a Simulation report, deliverable 6.1.



3 1.53 9 5.47

RENAULT (M10-M12): Renault provided vehicle data and supported the simulation model development. (0.46PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): Support for brake system model (0.24PM) UNIMORE (M10-M12): -Collaboration with Chalmers in the definition of the Matlab/Simulink regenerative braking simulation model to be integrated into the ICOOR simulator - Integration of the model in the ICOOR simulator and pre-evaluation tests of the regenerative braking with ICOOR simulator experts (0.4PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 36 of 83



Task title Validation of driver performance simulation models


RENAULT

Progress of work Task 6.2 (M10-M18) Validation of driver performance simulation models. The Fluence EV was modified in the Renault workshop. By using CAD, the positions of the prototype parts were checked to avoid contact with the body of the car or the parts of the axle. That's why, during the mounting process, the specific brake calipers were fitted easily into the Wheel housing. For the CAN networks of the EHCB, a specific wiring was developed and fitted in the engine compartment. Also, measurement equipments and the additional battery were placed in the trunk. When the mechanical and electrical integration are finalized, the software integration was still in progress. Unfortunately, the next step was a little bit tricky. We spent time in order to fix some issues with the software compatibility. With the support of the team in charge of the serial development, we worked to solve the problem. By modifying control parameter in three controllers, and adapting the interface between EHCB and our prototype system, we have succeeded to integrate properly the EHCB system in the car. The fine tuning of the braking system in the car is in progress and will be ready for the next step.



1.38 1 2 2

RENAULT (M10-M12): Validation of the scenarios from Icoor. (0.2PM) RENAULT (M16-M18): Adjustment M10-M12 (0.8PM)



Task title Setup of vehicle evaluation procedures for each subsystem


RENAULT, IDIADA, Conti Teve

Progress of work Task 6.3 (M10-M18) Setup of vehicle evaluation procedures for each subsystem. This tasks is finalized The task was handled with a close cooperation between the members. The Continental experience in braking system, the know-how of IDIADA in the vehicle testing and the expertise of Renault in vehicle fine tuning were the three pillars of this work. The mains topics of the vehicle evaluation are: Braking performance validation test, braking performance targets, regenerative braking evaluation and clinic tests. These chapters are detailed in the document D6_2_Test_Procedure. This document is the deliverable of this task. It was submitted. As a conclusion, we shared know-how in order to improved procedures. We will work together for the evaluation based on these procedures.



12.12 11.44 17.5 19.61

RENAULT (M10-M12): The braking system has been mechanically integrated in the electric Fluence. (0.68PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 37 of 83

RENAULT (M16-M18): Adjustments M10-M12 (7.76PM) IDIADA (M13-M15): WP 6 Meeting in Aubevoye. Validation program to evaluate the efficiency of the RB on a test bench and proposing realistic test cycles (1.5PM) IDIADA (M16-M18): WP 6 Workshop in Aachen. Establishment of validation procedure for Braking System Performance and performance comparisons with the original Braking System and the Benchmark vehicle. Contribution to Delivery 6.2 (0.46PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): Brake pedal characteristics analyzed (0.32PM) Conti Teve (M13-M15): Brake pedal characteristics improved (0.35PM) Conti Teve (M16-M18): Transfer function of braking system measured (0.37PM)



Task title Evaluation (of simulations) and experimental tests


RENAULT, IDIADA, ICOOR, UNIMORE

Progress of work Task 6.4 (M10-M24) Evaluation (of simulations) and experimental tests The work done in the previous tasks was on the vehicle model development and also on the tuning of the driving simulator. The performance achieved by the driving simulator is at a good level. Nevertheless, we have to focus on the specific work of a simulator. The strong point of this tool is for HMI testing in emergency situation. We are allowed to have driving critical scenario without safety issues. The second strong point is the comparison between two trips. The scenarios are identically to have comparable testing conditions. At the opposite, even with good performances in simulation, the evaluation of braking comfort could be very difficult or not realistic. Due to these points, we have chosen two types of scenarios: One is an urban trip, the second extra urban. During the driving session, some emergency maneuvers are tested. The clinic tests are in progress and we will have results at the end of the task.



5.7 7.6 9.5 7.6

RENAULT (M13-M15): The focus is on the pedal feeling. The challenge is to achieve a seamless behavior of the braking pedal. (2.12PM) RENAULT (M16-M18): Check the maneuver for the driving simulator. (0.88PM) IDIADA (M16-M18): Analyzing EV validation procedures of typical driving cycles and simulations from WP3 and test methods to evaluate and compare the recuperation rate of the Regenerative Braking. Working on validation procedures for the improvement of consumption and range. (0.5PM) ICOOR (M16-M18): In collaboration with UNIMORE researcher ICOOR team has performed the following activity for the clinic tests of the system developed within the project. In particular the following activities has been carried out: - Scenario preparation; - Simulator setup & preparation; - Pre-test performing; - Clinics test performing; (2.5PM) UNIMORE (M10-M12): - Definition of the driving simulator scenarios and test where the model will be evaluated - Definition of the parameters to be recorded during the simulation used to evaluate driver performance while interacting with the regenerative braking model (0.6PM) UNIMORE (M13-M15): UNIMORE has contributed to D6.1 Simulation report and it has done the following activities: - Development of experimental test plan for clinics tests; - Development and pre-testing of Regenerative Braking Model to include in the UNIMORE



2012-Jan-31 Page 38 of 83

simulator; (0.6PM) UNIMORE (M16-M18): In collaboration with ICOOR Team we have collaborate to the clinic tests preparation and realization. (0.4PM)



Task title Performing test drives with demonstrator vehicles


RENAULT, IDIADA, Conti Teve

Progress of work Task 6.5 (M10-M24) Performing test drives with demonstrator vehicles The work done in the previous tasks was on the vehicle model development and also on the tuning of the driving simulator. Also, the braking system was integrated in the Fluence EV. This 6.5 task will be in charge of using those tools. The first tests were done with the modified Megane. During this first phase, some critical point was highlighted. A first improvement of the system was proposed by Continental. The performance was really better, and we gained time by this early adjustment. Now we are starting the measurement phase with the Fluence EV. This vehicle is representative of an EV included the drawbacks. The limited range will be difficult for the testing process. Taking into account of this distinctive feature, we will carefully manage the tests. The prototype vehicle is in Frankfurt for tuning and measurement. A test session on low Mu is planned in Arvidsjaur during this winter. Finally, a test in Aubevoye will organized for a final evaluation process.



19.8 11.18 33 11.18

RENAULT (M16-M18): Test done with the Fluence EV. The fine tuning of the car is in progress. (5.51PM) Conti Teve (M10-M12): Braking tests started (1.95PM) Conti Teve (M13-M15): System integration tests (1.69PM) Conti Teve (M16-M18): Brake system integration tests finished (2.03PM)


Lead Participant RENAULT Actual-Start: Actual-End:

Task title Analysis of relevant driving maneuvers


RENAULT, IDIADA, UNIMORE




0 0 16 0




2012-Jan-31 Page 39 of 83

3.3. Project Management

This section reports on the financial and legal aspects of the ID4EV project during the first period. All

technical aspects, activities, concepts and deliverables which allow assessment of the project

progress from R&D perspective are explained in detail in the periodic progress report per each WP

and task. All management activities are fully covered by work package WP 1 “Project Management”

and WP 7 “Dissemination”.

Objectives of both work packages

The objectives of these both work packages are …

>> conducting all activities regarding the planning, co-ordination and monitoring of the project as well

as the dissemination of project results and reporting to the European Commission.

>> make contact to further EU funded R&D projects on electro-mobility and, as appropriate, screen

standards as to the project results, as well as developing a special dissemination plan to guarantee

wide industrial acceptance of the project results.

Summary of the Work performed so far and main results

The project management team is coping with all overall organizational matters, i.e. preparation of

quarterly steering committee meetings, finalizing periodic activities , coordinating contract

amendments , preparation of review meetings with the European Commission, planning of the final

event and tracking of project internal quality measures.

In the second period the first review meeting was organized and executed on May 12th, 2011 in

Brussels. The outcome of the first review meeting report was taken as the basis for a re-assessment

of the work package cooperation and of the project quality processes.

The consortium finalized the first contract amendment which has been approved by the European

Commission on July 06th, 2011. The main modification to the grant agreement has been the entry of

the third party UNIMORE, which is linked to the contractor ICOOR.

After the completion of the contract amendment the consortium was able to finalize the first periodic

report (included the third party UNIMORE) and submit its cost statements to the European

Commission.

For the second third of the project phase) the first focus in project management was on preparing the

2nd

Contract Amendment. The second focus was on pushing technical implementation on the basis of

the gained -partially theoretical- results of the first nine months project duration.

With beginning of the last project phase most technical issues are on track and only need minor

support from the project management. In parallel planning for the final event has started. Thus

management work will be mostly put into monitoring, reporting and planning of the last periodic activity

report and the above mentioned final event in late summer of 2012.



2012-Jan-31 Page 40 of 83

During the second project period continuously effort has been made to disseminate the project results.

Several papers have been presented, e.g. Aachen Colloquium and SIA conference in Mulhouse.

Additional publications are under preparation. Several deliverables, approved on by the European

Commission, have been published on the project website. The project has been presented at four

different conferences. In addition to the dissemination plan the consortium is elaborating a project wide

exploitation plan.

Steering Group

The steering group members have been involved into any contractual issues and are well informed

about any relevant project issues and news. Details, decisions and action items for all steering

committee meetings are described in the corresponding meeting minutes, which can be provided upon

request.

A list of the steering committee (SC) meetings after the first review meeting is presented below. During

the SC meetings contractual, financial and other management issues are addressed. Moreover the

status of each technical WP is discussed and assessed.

Event Date Venue

3rd

Steering Committee Meeting May 03rd

, 2011 Web based Meeting

4th Steering Committee Meeting September 07

th, 2011 Aubevoye, France

5th Steering Committee Meeting December 08

th, 2012 Aachen, Germanny

6th Steering Committee Meeting March 08

th, 2012 Arvidsjaur, Sweden

Preparation of the second contract amendment

The preparation of the second contract amendment started after the fourth Steering Committee

Meeting. All necessary changes have been addressed and discussed in this meeting. Based on the

work progress and the gained experience the time lines of some tasks have to be adopted as well as

deliverable dates. The changes do not have an impact on the overall project goal.

Furthermore, in the course of planning of the final event, the consortium intends to extend the project

duration by 2 months from August 2012 to end of October 2012.

The formal request for the second contract amendment is in preparation.



2012-Jan-31 Page 41 of 83

3.3.1. List of Beneficiaries

Beneficiary Number

Beneficiary name Beneficiary short name

Country Date enter project

Date exit project

1 (CO) Continental Engineering Services GmbH

CONTI Germany 1 27

2 fka Forschungsgesellschaft Kraftfahrwesen mbH Aachen

fka Germany 1 27

3 RENAULT s.a.s. represented by GIE REGIENOV

RENAULT France 1 27

4 ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN AG ZF Germany 1 27

5 IDIADA AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY SA

IDIADA Spain 1 27

6 CHALMERS TEKNISKA HOEGSKOLA AB

CTHA Sweden 1 27

7 NEDERLANDSE ORGANISATIE VOOR

TOEGEPAST NATUURWETENSCHAPPELIJK

ONDERZOEK - TNO

NOVTNO-T Netherlands 1 27

8 CONSORZIO INTERUNIVERSITARIO PER

L'OTTIMIZZAZIONE E LA RICERCA OPERATIVA -

ICOOR

ICOOR Italy 1 27

9 TP-Continental Automotive GmbH

Conti Auto Germany 1 27

10 TP-Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG

Conti Teve Germany 1 27

11 TP-Conti Temic microelectronic GmbH

Conti Temi Germany 1 27

12 TP-Universita degli Studi Di Modena e Reggio Emilia

UNIMORE Italy 1 27

Table 6 - List of Beneficiaries



2012-Jan-31 Page 42 of 83

3.3.2. Consortium management tasks and achievements


Lead Participant CONTI Actual-Start: M01 Actual-End: M27

Work package title Project Management

Activity Type Management activities

Participant involved fka, CONTI


The “Intelligent Dynamics for fully Electric Vehicles” (ID4EV) project was started on July 29th, 2010 with Continental as the project coordinating partner. Participating project members are Renault, ZF, IDIADA, Chalmers University, fka, TNO and ICOOR. Project goal is to conjointly develop brake and chassis systems for the needs of electrically powered vehicles. The project management team is coping with all overall organizational matters, i.e. preparation of quarterly steering committee meetings, coordinating periodic activity reports, monitoring of financial figures, planning of the final event and tracking project internal quality measures. For the second third of the project phase (project month 10 to month 18 inclusively) the first focus in project management was on supporting the consortium partners in administrative needs. During several meetings and telephone conferences it became evident to prepare a contract amendment to allow the consortium to achieve more knowhow and more detailed plus validated results. The second focus was on pushing technical implementation on the basis of the gained -partially theoretical- results of the first nine months project duration. In the same subject value was set on proper documentation for subsequent use. Each work package leader is asked to frequently report on the work progress in technical terms in terms of cooperation within the project. These presentations are used for tracking implementation progress but also as the basis of quality monitoring of internal cooperation and information exchange. With beginning of the last project phase most technical issues are on track and only need minor support from the project management. In parallel planning for the final event has started. Thus management work will be mostly put into monitoring, reporting and planning of the last periodic activity report and the above mentioned final event in lat summer of 2012.



Task no. Task 1.1 Activity: Management Plan-Start: M01 Plan-End: M27


Task title Project Financial Reporting


fka

Progress of work The project financial reporting as an ongoing process is characterized by continuously efforts to assist the project partners in their reporting efforts. During the second PAR period the main effort was to implement the cost reports for the 1st Project Annual Report. Additional effort has been spend to verify the consistency and correctness of the reports provided to the European Commission.



2 1.7 6 3.5



2012-Jan-31 Page 43 of 83

fka (M10-M12): Increased efforts to support partners on first PAR (1PM) fka (M13-M15): supporting project coordinator and project partners on financial reporting (0.5PM) fka (M16-M18): supporting project coordinator and consortium partners on financial reporting issues (0.2PM)



Task title Project Coordination and Administration


CONTI

Progress of work By the end of the second project third project coordination and administration is a well-rehearsed process according to the project internal guidelines and rules. Coordination comprises scheduling, planning and moderating of overall project related meetings, i.e. steering committee meeting, either by video conference or by face to face meetings. The coordination team is centralizing relevant project information from the EC, public private partnership conferences/ programs and from technical congresses to broadcast it to the consortium members. It is also responsible for gathering input from the partners concerning issues of project management, e.g. time planning of a work packages and project task, reallocation of financial means or contractual matters such as contract amendments. After having received the report of the first review meeting it was the responsibility of the project management to analyze the named objections to compile and suggest counter actions for improvement. These actions have been presented and discussed within the steering committee members pursing the goal of getting broad acceptance and of a fast implementation. To mention just one of the actions a dissemination plan to publish and use the results and knowhow within the project was elaborated.



3 3.62 9 7.22

CONTI (M10-M12): The deviation is caused by supporting the project partners for the first periodic activity and management report and preparation of the first review meeting with the EC. (1.62PM) CONTI (M13-M15): Finalization of contract amendment and the Form C's during reporting period. (1.05PM) CONTI (M16-M18): Documentation of 2nd periodic activity report, the second contract amendment and starting of final event preparation. (0.95PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 44 of 83



Task title Quality control


CONTI

Progress of work From the very beginning of the ID4EV project the consortium committed itself to the high quality standard for EC supported research and development projects. As a consequence a quality assurance process was installed to ensure continuously document reviewing on different expert levels. The methods for quality control and progress monitoring are part of a project wide continuously improvement process (CIP). Every steering committee member is requested to contribute to the ongoing and the success of this CIP.

Figure 15 - ID4EV Internal quality assurance process for reporting papers ID4EV Internal quality assurance process for reporting papers The outcome of the first review meeting report was taken as the basis for a reassessment of the project quality processes and how they are handled. It is considered as mutual assistance to help treating every task not only in technical detail but also in the overall project context. It is our goal to have every project partner understand the work package outcomes and how it all interacts.



0.67 0.79 2 1.99

CONTI (M10-M12): Significantly more time was needed to check and supervise all relevant project documents (deliverables, calculations, presentations,...) to be prepared for the first review meeting. (0.35PM) CONTI (M13-M15): No disturbances during reporting period. (0.17PM) CONTI (M16-M18): Internal review of the 2nd PAR draft and first 3-months report. (0.27PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 45 of 83


Lead Participant CONTI Actual-Start: Actual-End:

Task title Final reports


CONTI




0 0 3 0




2012-Jan-31 Page 46 of 83



Work package title Dissemination

Activity Type Management activities

Participant involved fka, ICOOR, UNIMORE, ZF, Conti Auto, IDIADA


Work on project dissemination has been continued. Efforts are focused on preparing scientific papers to be presented at various conferences, publishing approved deliverables and planning of the final event. Several deliverables, approved on by the European Commission, have been published on the project website. The project has been presented at 4 different conferences.





Task title Dissemination Plan


fka, ICOOR, UNIMORE

Progress of work In addition to the dissemination plan the European Commission requested an Exploitation Plan outlining the intended economical and scientific exploitation of the project. Work on this document has been started. The data on suitable conferences for ID4EV dissemination has been updated continuously.



1 0.75 3 1.75

fka (M10-M12): minor efforts on continuous support for dissemination activities (0.05PM) fka (M13-M15): No work on the dissemination plan was required during this period. (0PM) fka (M16-M18): no resources reported during this period (0PM) ICOOR (M16-M18): Draft of project news, continuously dissemination of project contents to local stakeholders. (0.5PM) UNIMORE (M10-M12): Presentation of ID4EV at the REACT conference (where the project won the second prize), including preparation of material presented (0.2PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 47 of 83


Lead Participant ICOOR Actual-Start: M01 Actual-End: M27

Task title Project Website


fka, ICOOR, UNIMORE

Progress of work During the period with the support of our third party UNIMORE we have accomplished the following activities:

Maintenance and enhancement of the project website,

Update of the text in the main sections of the website.

Enhancement of the project documents template

Update of the deliverable section of the website.

Update of the section news of the website



1.17 2.36 3.5 3.17

fka (M10-M12): minor efforts on providing new website content (0.1PM) fka (M13-M15): No work on the project website was done during this period. (0PM) fka (M16-M18): no resources reported during this period (0PM) ICOOR (M16-M18): Continuative update and maintenance of the project website (0.75PM) UNIMORE (M10-M12): Maintenance and enhancement of the project website, including update of the text in the main sections. Enhancement of the project documents template (0.4PM) UNIMORE (M13-M15): Maintenance and enhancement of the project website, including update of the deliverable section. (0.51PM) UNIMORE (M16-M18): Continuously updating of the project website and news in collaboration with ICOOR team (0.6PM)



Task title Publication and media


fka, ZF, Conti Auto

Progress of work During the second PAR period continuous effort has been made to disseminate the project results. Several papers have been presented (Aachen Colloquium and SIA conference in Mulhouse) and additional publications are under preparation. Continuous support has been given to the project consortium to assist in disseminating project results.



1 0.4 3 0.75

fka (M10-M12): partners supported in preparing publications (0.25PM) fka (M13-M15): Small efforts on supporting the project partners during this period. (0.05PM) fka (M16-M18): assisting project partners in their dissemination efforts (0.1PM) ZF (M10-M12): No publications in this period (0PM) ZF (M16-M18): Nothing to do in this period (0PM) Conti Auto (M10-M12): No publication planed in this period (0PM) Conti Auto (M13-M15): No publication planed in this period (0PM) Conti Auto (M16-M18): No publication planned in this period (0PM)



2012-Jan-31 Page 48 of 83



Task title Events


IDIADA, fka, ZF, Conti Auto

Progress of work During the second periodic reporting period several internal meetings have been held including two steering committee meetings to coordinated project efforts. Planning of the final event, a major effort to be performed in task 7.4, has been started.



1.08 0.33 3.25 0.73

fka (M10-M12): preliminary work on the planning of the projects final event (0.05PM) fka (M13-M15): Work on preliminary planning continued. (0.05PM) fka (M16-M18): planning of final event (0.05PM) ZF (M10-M12): No events in this period. (0PM) ZF (M16-M18): Nothing to do in this period (0PM) IDIADA (M13-M15): Proposal for Final Event in IDIADA (0.1PM) IDIADA (M16-M18): Final event preparation - checking possible dates and cost of the event (0.08PM) Conti Auto (M10-M12): No events planned in this period (0PM) Conti Auto (M13-M15): No event planned in this period (0PM)




2012-Jan-31 Page 49 of 83

3.3.3. Project planning and status

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Completion

WP 1 Project Management (69%)

Task 1.1 Project Financial Reporting (80%)

Task 1.2 Project Coordination and Administration (80%)

Task 1.3 Quality control (90%)

Task 1.4 (0%)

WP 2 Requirements and Specifications (100%)

Task 2.1 Analysis of user needs (100%)

Task 2.2 State of the art analysis (100%)

Task 2.3 Definition of requirements and specifications for brake-by-wire systems (100%)

Task 2.4 Definition of requirements and specifications for brake system including recuperation (system level) (100%)

Task 2.5 Definition of requirements and specifications for chassis systems (100%)

Task 2.6 Definition of requirements and specifications for network communication (100%)

Task 2.7 Integrated functionality for vehicle dynamics performance and safety (100%)

WP 3 Intelligent Brakes for fully Electric Vehicles (74%)

Task 3.1 State of the Art Analysis of Brake Systems (100%)

Task 3.2 System- and E/E-Architecture for Brake System (100%)

Task 3.3 Design and Production of Brake System (100%)

Task 3.4 Recuperation and Energy Management with Brake System and Central Electric Motor (100%)

Task 3.5 HMI-Topics of Brake Systems (35%)

Task 3.6 Intelligent Motion Control (60%)

Task 3.7 Safety Concept for Brake Systems (60%)

Task 3.8 Integration, Testing and Release of Brake System (60%)



2012-Jan-31 Page 50 of 83

WP 4 Intelligent Chassis for fully Electric vehicles (46%)

Task 4.1 State of the art analysis (100%)

Task 4.2 Driving comfort (45%)

Task 4.3 Durability of E/E chassis components (45%)

Task 4.4 Safety concept for E/E chassis components (40%)

WP 5 Intelligent Functionality by Cooperative Interaction for fully Electric Vehicles (64%)

Task 5.1 Requirements engineering for system components (100%)

Task 5.2 Concept development (100%)

Task 5.3 HW, SW, algorithm and HMI implementation (80%)

Task 5.4 Demonstrator (0%)

Task 5.5 Pre-evaluation (50%)

Task 5.6 Test and Evaluation (0%)

WP 6 Test and Evaluation (65%)

Task 6.1 Implementation of driver performance simulation models (100%)

Task 6.2 Validation of driver performance simulation models (100%)

Task 6.3 Setup of vehicle evaluation procedures for each subsystem (100%)

Task 6.4 Evaluation (of simulations) and experimental tests (75%)

Task 6.5 Performing test drives with demonstrator vehicles (60%)

Task 6.6 Analysis of relevant driving maneuvers (0%)

WP 7 Dissemination (55%)

Task 7.1 Dissemination Plan (80%)

Task 7.2 Project Website (65%)

Task 7.3 Publication and media (40%)

Task 7.4 Events (35%)

Table 9 - Project planning and status (Gantt chart)



2012-Jan-31 Page 51 of 83

4. Deliverables and Milestones Tables

4.1. Overview of Adherence to Plan of Deliverables

Del. No. Deliverable name Version WP no. Lead beneficiary

Nature Dissemination level

Delivery date from Annex I

Status Contrac- tual

Actual / Forecast delivery

date

Comments

D 07. 1 Webpage WP 7 ICOOR O PU M02 Accepted Yes 12.01.11 (M08)

12.07.2011 (M14) The deliverable has been accepted by the European Commission.

D 07. 2 Dissemination plan WP 7 fka R PU M03 Accepted Yes 17.12.10 (M07)


D 03.1 Brake by wire specification document

WP 3 Conti Teve

R RE M08 Accepted Yes 14.06.11 (M13)


D 03.2 Regenerative brake system specification document

WP 3 Conti Teve

R RE M08 Accepted Yes 14.06.11 (M13)


D 05.1 System specification summary document

WP 5 Conti Auto R PU M08 Accepted Yes 31.01.11 (M08)


D 01.1 First project review report

WP 1 CONTI R PU M09 Accepted Yes 28.04.11 (M11)

12.07.2011 (M14) The deliverable has been



2012-Jan-31 Page 52 of 83






date

Comments

accepted by the European Commission.

D 02.1 Requirements and specifications derived from user needs and sota analysis

WP 2 fka R PU M12 Accepted Yes 26.05.11 (M12)


D 03.3 Demonstrator vehicle built report

WP 3 Conti Teve

R RE M16 Submitted Yes 01.11.11 (M18)

01.11.2011 (M18) Deliverable has been submitted to the EC in due time.

D 01.2 Second project review report

WP 1 CONTI R PU M18 Submitted Yes 31.01.2012 (M20)

31.01.2012 (M20) Deliverable 1.2, version 1 to be send out end of January 2012

D 04.2 Durability test report E/E chassis components

WP 4 ZF R RE M18 Not submitted

Yes M27 The postponed due date is officially made public to the EC in the second contract amendment.

D 06.1 Simulation report WP 6 CTHA R PU M18 Submitted Yes 30.11.2011 (M19)

16.11.2011 (M18) Deliverable has been handed in to the coordinator. Later submitted to the EC.

D 06.2 Test procedure for the prototype vehicle

WP 6 RENAULT R RE M18 Submitted Yes 30.11.11 (M18)

14.11.2011 (M18) Deliverable has been handed in to the coordinator. Later



2012-Jan-31 Page 53 of 83






date

Comments

submitted to the EC.

D 04.1 Safety concept E/E chassis components

WP 4 ZF R RE M21 Not submitted


D 05.2 System components integrated in Demonstrator

WP 5 Conti Auto R RE M21 Not submitted


D 03.4 Vehicle test report WP 3 Conti Teve

R RE M24 Not submitted

Yes 31.05.12 (M24)

D 01.3 Final reports WP 1 CONTI R PU M27 Not submitted

Yes 31.08.12 (M27)

D 03.5 Final vehicle validation report

WP 3 Conti Teve

R RE M27 Not submitted

Yes 31.08.12 (M27)

D 04.3 Axle arrangement including in-wheel drive and adaptive suspension

WP 4 ZF D RE M27 Not submitted

Yes 31.08.12 (M27)

D 05.3 Final Demonstrator documentation and test results

WP 5 Conti Auto D PU M27 Not submitted

Yes 31.08.12 (M27)

D 06.3 Vehicle validation report

WP 6 RENAULT R RE M27 Not submitted

Yes 31.08.12 (M27)

D 06.4 Electric vehicle with WP 6 RENAULT D PU M27 Not Yes 31.08.12



2012-Jan-31 Page 54 of 83






date

Comments

regenerative braking submitted (M27)

D 07. 3 Final event WP 7 fka D PP M27 Not submitted

Yes 31.08.12 (M27)

Table 10 - Deliverables Table

4.2. Overview of Adherence to Plan of Work documents

WD. No. Work document name Version WP no. Lead beneficiary




Actual / Forecast

delivery date

Comments

WD 5.1 System requirements document

WP 5 Conti Auto

R CO M04 Approved No 30.11.10 (M06)

Template for requirements development defined Topics identified

WD 5.2 Use case description WP 5 Conti Auto

R RE M04 Approved No 30.11.10 (M06)

Use case description reviewed and updated

WD 2.1 User needs and state of the art analysis

WP 2 fka R CO M08 Approved No 31.01.11 (M08)

By finalizing D2.1 work on WD2.1 has been completed.

WD 2.2 Specifications for the subsystems

WP 2 fka R CO M08 Approved No 17.05.11 (M12)

By finalizing D2.1, work on WD2.2 has been completed.

WD 5.3 Interaction concept WP 5 Conti Auto

O CO M08 Approved No 23.02.11(M09) Concept reviewed and made available.



2012-Jan-31 Page 55 of 83

WD. No. Work document name Version WP no. Lead beneficiary




Actual / Forecast

delivery date

Comments

WD 5.4 System architecture document

WP 5 Conti Auto

O CO M08 Approved No 23.02.11 (M09)

Document finished and made available.

WD 5.5 Profile specification WP 5 Conti Auto

R RE M08 Approved No 31.01.11 (M08)

Profile specifications identified and documemted.

WD 3.1 Architecture specification and network communication signal list

WP 3 Conti Teve

R CO M12 Approved No 31.05.11 (M12)

E/E-architecture and electrical wiring defined.

WD 5.6 System components SW

WP 5 Conti Auto

P CO M18 Not submitted

30.11.-1 (M00)

WD 5.7 System components HW

WP 5 fka P CO M18 Not submitted

30.11.-1 (M00)

WD 5.8 Prototypes of system components

WP 5 Conti Auto

P CO M20 Not submitted

30.11.-1 (M00)

WD 5.9 System test plan WP 5 Conti Auto

O CO M23 Not submitted

30.11.-1 (M00)

Table 11 - Work documents



2012-Jan-31 Page 56 of 83

4.3. Overview of Adherence to Plan of Milestones

Milestone no.

Milestone name WP No. Lead beneficiary


Status Actual / Forecast achievement date

Comments

M 1 End of requirement phase WP 2 fka 08 Yes 31.01.11 (M08) Milestone goals have been accomplished on time.

M 2 End of system integration phase IB4EV

WP 3 Conti Teve 16 No 30.09.11 (M16) Milestone goals have been accomplished on time.

M 3 End of system integration phase IC4EV & IF4EV

WP 4 ZF M21 No M24 Due date for Milestone 3 has to be postponed because of delays for ordered components.

M 4 End of vehicle tests and trials WP 3 Conti Teves

M24 No M24 Test procedures have been defined and agreed by the involved parties. The achievement of this milestone seems to be sure.

M 5 End of validation phase WP 3 Conti Teves

M27 No M27 No relevant activities started yet.

Table 12 - Milestones



2012-Jan-31 Page 57 of 83

4.4. Internal and external project Co-operation

4.4.1. Internal Meetings

Start Date End Date Description Participants Location

08.03.2011 08.03.2011 9th WP4 Meeting in Aachen 9th WP4 Meeting in Aachen

Thomas Kopp (ZF)

23.03.2011 23.03.2011 10th WP4 Meeting WebEx 10th WP4 Meeting WebEx

Thomas Kopp (ZF)

13.04.2011 13.04.2011 11th WP4 Meeting Barcelona 11th WP4 Meeting Barcelona

Thomas Kopp (ZF)

26.04.2011 26.04.2011 ID4EV Task 6.1 Meeting 8 Working meeting.

Mathias Lidberg (CTHA)

Audio and Webex

03.05.2011 03.05.2011 ID4EV: 3rd Steering Committee Meeting

Christian Förster (fka), Maja Stevanovic

(Conti), Thomas Raste (Conti), Holmer-Geert Grundmann

(Conti), Olivier Cayol (Renault), Paolo Falcone

(Chalmers), Thomas Kopp (ZF), Sandro Boltshauser

(Idiada), Luca Canovi (ICOOR),

Sven Jansen (TNO), Patrick Spall (Conti)

Web-based telephone conference

26.07.2011 26.07.2011 WP 4 meeting internal WP4 meeting

Christian Förster (fka), Thomas

Kopp (ZF), Jonathan Webb

(IDIADA)

fka, Aachen, Germany

06.09.2011 06.09.2011 ID4EV: WP6: Face to Face Meeting

Sofiane Amara (RENAULT),

Bernward Bayer (Conti Teve),

Sandro Boltshauser (IDIADA),

Caterina Calefato (ICOOR), Luca

Canovi (ICOOR), Vincent Délu (RENAULT),

Paolo Falcone (CTHA), Chiara

Ferrarini (ICOOR), Serena

Fruttaldo

Renault Centre Technique d'Aubevoye, Le parc de Gaillon, 27940 Aubevoye



2012-Jan-31 Page 58 of 83

(ICOOR), Mathias Lidberg (CTHA),

Luca Minin (ICOOR), Cayol

Olivier (RENAULT),

Jérôme Perrin (RENAULT),

Thomas Raste (Conti Teve),

Andrea Spadoni (ICOOR), Francesco

Tesauri (ICOOR), Jonathan Webb

(IDIADA)

06.09.2011 07.09.2011 ID4EV: 04th Steering Committee Meeting

Sofiane Amara (RENAULT),

Sandro Boltshauser

(IDIADA), Luca Canovi (ICOOR),

Vincent Délu (RENAULT),

Christian Förster (fka), Holmer-

Geert Grundmann (Conti Auto), Qihui Huang (fka), Sven

Jansen (NOVTNO-T), Thomas Kopp (ZF), Mathias

Lidberg (CTHA), Cayol Olivier (RENAULT),

Jérôme Perrin (RENAULT),

Thomas Raste (Conti Teve),

Andrea Spadoni (ICOOR), Patrick Spall (CONTI),

Maja Stevanovic (CONTI)

Renault Centre Technique d'Aubevoye, Le parc de Gaillon, 27940 Aubevoye


Paolo Falcone (Chalmers),

Sofiane Amara (Renault), Sven Jansen (TNO),

Maja Stevanovic (Conti), Holmer-

Geert Grundmann

(Conti), Thomas Raste (Conti),

fka – Forschungsgesellschaft Kraftfahrwesen mbH, Steinbachstraße 7, 52074 Aachen



2012-Jan-31 Page 59 of 83

Daniel Schmitz (Conti), Patrick Spall (Conti),

Sandro Boltshauser

(Idiada), Thomas Kopp (ZF),

Christian Förster (fka), Qihui Huang (fka)


Mandatory for all work package

leaders. Representatives

of all partners welcome.

Continental Proving Grounds Arvidsjaur FACK 110 Fi-93322 Arvidsjaur Sweden

Table 13 - Internal Meetings

4.4.2. Conference Calls


04.03.2011 04.03.2011 WP5 Navi Status Telco Agenda: Follow up open issues Navi WS Status implementation Navigation

Holmer-Geert Grundmann (Conti Auto), Frank Hagl (Conti Auto), Qihui Huang (fka), Heiko Schnieders (Conti

Auto)

Telco

22.03.2011 22.03.2011 WP5 HMI Status Telco Agenda: Timing Schedule VAPS XT Training Status Interaction Concept Status Symbols Status Screen Design

Luca Canovi (ICOOR), Holmer-Geert

Grundmann (Conti Auto), Frank Hagl

(Conti Auto), Alexander Niemeyer (Conti Auto), Herbert Thomas (Conti Auto)

Telco

30.03.2011 30.03.2011 ID4EV Task 6.1 Meeting 7 Working meeting.

Sofiane Amara (RENAULT), Caterina

Calefato (ICOOR), Paolo Falcone

(CTHA), Mathias Lidberg (CTHA), Luca Minin (ICOOR), Cayol

Olivier (RENAULT)

Audio + Webex

19.04.2011 19.04.2011 WP5 HMI Status Telco Agenda Status Implementation Status Screen Design, etc.

Caterina Calefato (ICOOR), Luca Canovi

(ICOOR), Holmer-Geert Grundmann (Conti Auto), Frank Hagl (Conti Auto), Qihui Huang (fka),

Alexander Niemeyer (Conti Auto), Heiko

Telco



2012-Jan-31 Page 60 of 83

Schnieders (Conti Auto), Andrea Spadoni

(ICOOR)

21.04.2011 21.04.2011 WP5 Navi/HMI Interface Agenda: Review messages between Navi and HMI


Grundmann (Conti Auto), Frank Hagl (Conti Auto), Qihui

Huang (fka), Alexander Niemeyer (Conti Auto), Heiko Schnieders (Conti

Auto), Andrea Spadoni (ICOOR)

Telco

03.05.2011 03.05.2011 ID4EV: 03rd Steering Committee Meeting

Christian Förster (fka), Maja Stevanovic

(Conti), Thomas Raste (Conti), Holmer-Geert Grundmann (Conti),

Olivier Cayol (Renault), Paolo

Falcone (Chalmers), Thomas Kopp (ZF), Sandro Boltshauser

(Idiada), Luca Canovi (ICOOR), Sven

Jansen (TNO), Patrick Spall (Conti)

Audio + Webex

10.05.2011 10.05.2011 WP5 HMI Status Telco Agenda: Status activities ICOOR Review CAN Messages Review HMI/Navi Messages



Huang (fka), Alexander Niemeyer (Conti Auto), Heiko Schnieders (Conti

Auto), Andrea Spadoni (ICOOR)

Telco

17.05.2011 17.05.2011 WP5 HMI Status Telco Status Application Manager



Huang (fka), Alexander Niemeyer (Conti Auto), Andrea

Spadoni (ICOOR)

Telco

27.05.2011 27.05.2011 WP5 Review Navigation Control and Range Calculation Agenda: Review Navigation Control architecture Review Range Calculation

Holmer-Geert Grundmann (Conti Auto), Frank Hagl

(Conti Auto), Oliver Haider (Conti Temi), Qihui Huang (fka), Heiko Schnieders

(Conti Auto)

Telco



2012-Jan-31 Page 61 of 83

07.06.2011 07.06.2011 WP5 HMI Status Telco Agenda: Schedule Development progress Profile Manager


(ICOOR), Holmer-Geert Grundmann (Conti Auto), Frank Hagl (Conti Auto), Qihui Huang (fka),

Alexander Niemeyer (Conti Auto), Heiko Schnieders (Conti

Auto), Andrea Spadoni (ICOOR), Herbert

Thomas (Conti Auto), Adrian Zlocki (fka)

Telco

10.06.2011 10.06.2011 WP5 Review Power Tracer Review of Power Tracer implementation specification

Holmer-Geert Grundmann (Conti Auto), Frank Hagl

(Conti Auto), Oliver Haider (Conti Temi), Franz Hiller (Conti

Temi), Klaus Hinderberger (Conti

Temi), Heiko Schnieders (Conti

Auto)

Telco

21.06.2011 21.06.2011 WP5 HMI Status Telco Agenda Schedule Work Progress Open Issues


(ICOOR), Holmer-Geert Grundmann (Conti Auto), Frank Hagl (Conti Auto), Qihui Huang (fka), Heiko Schnieders

(Conti Auto), Andrea Spadoni (ICOOR),

Herbert Thomas (Conti Auto), Adrian Zlocki

(fka)

Telco

05.07.2011 05.07.2011 HMI implementation WS Open questions concerning HMI implementation

Luca Canovi (ICOOR), Qihui Huang (fka),

Jochen Möller (Conti Auto), Alexander

Niemeyer (Conti Auto), Heiko Schnieders

(Conti Auto), Andrea Spadoni (ICOOR),

Herbert Thomas (Conti Auto)

Telco

23.09.2011 23.09.2011 ID4EV Task 6.1 Meeting 12

Mathias Lidberg, Cayol Olivier, Sofiane

Amara, Andrea Spadoni, Francesco

Tesauri, Paolo Falcone, Patrick Spall

23.11.2011 23.11.2011 WP5 HMI Test via WebEx Test of the HMI via WebEx

Holmer-Geert Grundmann, Andrea

Telco



2012-Jan-31 Page 62 of 83

Spadoni

28.11.2011 28.11.2011 WP5 HMI Test via WebEx Test of newest HMI release via WebEx


Spadoni

Babenhausen and Telco

Table 14 - User

4.4.3. Workshop


12.07.2011 14.07.2011 WP5 HMI implementation Workshop

Frank Hagl (Conti Auto), Jochen Möller

(Conti Auto), Alexander Niemeyer (Conti Auto), Andrea Spadoni (ICOOR),

Herbert Thomas (Conti Auto)

Babenhausen

12.07.2011 14.07.2011 WP5 HMI Implementation WS Workshop to speed up the HMI implementation for WP5

Andrea Spadoni, Alexander Niemeyer,

Jochen Möller, Herbert Thomas

Babenhausen

12.07.2011 14.07.2011 WP5 HMI Implementation WS Workshop to speed up the HMI implementation for WP5

Holmer-Geert Grundmann, Andrea Spadoni, Alexander Niemeyer, Jochen

Möller, Herbert Thomas

Babenhausen

30.08.2011 01.09.2011 WP5 System Integration Workshop System Integration Workshop WP5

Holmer-Geert Grundmann, Qihui

Huang, Andrea Spadoni, Frank Hagl, Alexander Niemeyer,

Heiko Schnieders, Herbert Thomas,

Jochen Möller, Klaus Hinderberger, Oliver

Haider

Babenhausen

03.11.2011 03.11.2011 WP5 Integration WS RPS Goal of this WS is to integrate and test the Range Problem Solver with the debugger.

Holmer-Geert Grundmann, Frank

Hagl, Klaus Hinderberger

Babenhausen

09.11.2011 09.11.2011 WP5 Navigation Control System Integration Test Navigation Control System Integration test

Holmer-Geert Grundmann, Heiko

Schnieders

Babenhausen

15.11.2011 15.11.2011 WP5 Navigation Control System Integration Test Workshop to test the newest release of the Navigation Control SW

Holmer-Geert Grundmann

Babenhausen

17.11.2011 18.11.2011 WP5 HMI System Integration Test Test of the newest release of the


Babehausen



2012-Jan-31 Page 63 of 83

HMI Spadoni, Herbert Thomas, Alexander Niemeyer, Jochen

Möller

Table 15 - User



2012-Jan-31 Page 64 of 83

5. Explanation of the Use of the Resources

5.1. Overview of actual allocated Resources versus estimates

Activity Type P1 - CONTI P2 - fka

P3 - RENAULT

P4 - ZF P5 - IDIADA P6 - CTHA P7 - NOVTNO-

T P8 - ICOOR

P9 - Conti Auto

P10 - Conti Teve

P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A

Research activities

WP 2 -- -- 10.5 10.5 2 2 5.75 5.81 4 4 6 5.75 3 3 -- -- 1.5 1.5 3.5 3.37

WP 3 -- -- -- -- 2 2 1 0.13 17 15.95 10 5.77 19 12.75 -- -- -- -- 61 40.12

WP 4 -- -- 32 18.95 -- -- 81 53.8 13 3.75 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 0.2

WP 5 -- -- 25.5 22.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.4 1.1 1 1.75 62 38.24 0.5 0.33

WP 6 -- -- -- -- 48 28.1 -- -- 14.5 3.11 4 1.88 -- -- 3 2.5 -- -- 12.5 7.97

Total 0 0 68 51.95 52 32.1 87.75 59.74 48.5 26.81 20 13.4 25.4 16.85 4 4.25 63.5 39.74 78.5 51.99

Demonstration activities

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Management activities

WP 1 14 9.21 6 3.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

WP 7 -- -- 4 2.5 -- -- 2 -- 0.75 0.28 -- -- -- -- 2.7 1.25 1 -- -- --

Total 14 9.21 10 6 0 0 2 0 0.75 0.28 0 0 0 0 2.7 1.25 1 0 0 0



2012-Jan-31 Page 65 of 83

Other activities

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Beneficiaries 14 9.21 78 57.95 52 32.1 89.75 59.74 49.25 27.09 20 13.4 25.4 16.85 6.7 5.5 64.5 39.74 78.5 51.99

Table 16 - Actual and estimated Efforts per Activity Type per Beneficiary for the full project period (in person-month)

P = Planned Effort, A = Actual Effort



2012-Jan-31 Page 66 of 83

Activity Type P11 - Conti Temi P12 - UNIMORE Total Activities

% of total person month

P A P A P A P A

Research activities

WP 2 -- -- 2 1.98 38.25 37.76 7.2% 10.8%

WP 3 -- -- 8 2.54 115 79.26 21.6% 22.7%

WP 4 -- -- -- -- 127 76.7 23.9% 22%

WP 5 24 18.07 13 8.23 129.4 90.22 24.3% 25.9%

WP 6 -- -- 5 2.3 90 45.86 16.9% 13.1%

Total 24 18.07 28 15.05 499.65 329.8 93.8% 94.5%


Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%


WP 1 -- -- -- -- 20 12.71 3.8% 3.6%

WP 7 -- -- 2.3 2.37 12.75 6.4 2.4% 1.8%

Total 0 0 2.3 2.37 32.75 19.11 6.2% 5.5%

Other activities

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%

Total Beneficiaries 24 18.07 30.3 17.42 532.4 349.06 100% 100%



2012-Jan-31 Page 67 of 83

Table 17 - Actual and estimated Efforts per Activity Type per Beneficiary for the full project period (in person-month)




2012-Jan-31 Page 68 of 83

Activity Type P1 - CONTI P2 - fka P3 - RENAULT P4 - ZF P5 - IDIADA P6 - CTHA

P7 - NOVTNO-T

P8 - ICOOR P9 - Conti

Auto P10 - Conti

Teve

P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A

Research activities

WP 2 -- -- 3.07 2.7 0.55 -- 1.55 5.73 1.08 -- 3 3.45 1.5 1.2 -- -- 0.4 0.25 0.98 0.79

WP 3 -- -- -- -- 1.03 2 0.33 0.13 4.11 6.7 3.89 5.27 9.96 7.45 -- -- -- -- 27.39 25.2

WP 4 -- -- 11.76 9.75 -- -- 31.29 43.33 4.99 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.43 0.2

WP 5 -- -- 14.6 14 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.1 0.9 1.75 22.05 21.96 -- --

WP 6 -- -- -- -- 22.38 18.41 -- -- 7.08 2.46 1.75 0.43 -- -- 1.45 2.5 -- -- 7.29 6.95

Total 0 0 29.44 26.45 23.96 20.41 33.17 49.19 17.26 11.16 8.64 9.15 11.46 8.75 2.35 4.25 22.45 22.21 36.09 33.14


Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


WP 1 3.67 4.41 2 1.7 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

WP 7 -- -- 1.33 0.7 -- -- 0.67 -- 0.25 0.18 -- -- -- -- 0.9 1.25 0.33 -- -- --

Total 3.67 4.41 3.33 2.4 0 0 0.67 0 0.25 0.18 0 0 0 0 0.9 1.25 0.33 0 0 0

Other activities

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 3.67 4.41 32.77 28.85 23.96 20.41 33.84 49.19 17.51 11.34 8.64 9.15 11.46 8.75 3.25 5.5 22.78 22.21 36.09 33.14



2012-Jan-31 Page 69 of 83

Beneficiaries

Table 18 - Actual and estimated Efforts per Activity Type per Beneficiary for the Period (in person-month)




2012-Jan-31 Page 70 of 83

Activity Type P11 - Conti Temi P12 - UNIMORE Total Activities

% of total person month

P A P A P A P A

Research activities

WP 2 -- -- 0.52 -- 12.65 14.12 5.6% 6.4%

WP 3 -- -- 4.5 2.44 51.23 49.19 22.5% 22.4%

WP 4 -- -- -- -- 48.47 55.28 21.3% 25.2%

WP 5 20.25 14.13 5.4 6.23 63.2 58.17 27.8% 26.5%

WP 6 -- -- 2.05 2 42 32.75 18.5% 14.9%

Total 20.25 14.13 12.47 10.67 217.55 209.51 95.6% 95.5%


Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%


WP 1 -- -- -- -- 5.67 6.11 2.5% 2.8%

WP 7 -- -- 0.77 1.71 4.25 3.84 1.9% 1.7%

Total 0 0 0.77 1.71 9.92 9.95 4.4% 4.5%

Other activities

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%

Total Beneficiaries 20.25 14.13 13.24 12.38 227.47 219.46 100% 100%



2012-Jan-31 Page 71 of 83

Table 19 - Actual and estimated Efforts per Activity Type per Beneficiary for the Period (in person-month)




2012-Jan-31 Page 72 of 83

5.2. Overview of actual allocated Costs versus estimates

Activity Type P1 - CONTI P2 - fka P3 - RENAULT P4 - ZF P5 - IDIADA

P A P A P A P A P A

Research activities 0,00 0,00 590,866.00 372,089.98 956,931.00 403,680.12 1,003,722.00 534,641.95 669,600.00 359,382.27

Demonstration activities 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00

Management activities 242,545.00 96,666.67 82,070.00 40,436.72 4,000.00 0,00 22,335.00 0,00 9,900.00 2,936.41

Other activities 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00

Total Beneficiaries 242,545.00 96,666.67 672,936.00 412,526.70 960,931.00 403,680.12 1,026,057.00 534,641.95 679,500.00 362,318.68

Table 20 - Actual and estimated Costs per Activity Type per Beneficiary for the full project duration (in EURO)

Activity Type P6 - CTHA P7 - NOVTNO-T P8 - ICOOR P9 - Conti Auto P10 - Conti Teve

P A P A P A P A P A

Research activities 274,801.60 145,418.69 391,660.00 245,394.67 75,680.00 49,338.16 700,375.00 479,062.90 1,105,950.00 747,154.72


Management activities 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 19,440.00 6,908.02 11,550.00 0,00 2,000.00 0,00


Total Beneficiaries 274,801.60 145,418.69 391,660.00 245,394.67 95,120.00 56,246.18 711,925.00 479,062.90 1,107,950.00 747,154.72




2012-Jan-31 Page 73 of 83

Activity Type P11 - Conti Temi P12 - UNIMORE Total Costs % of total costs

P A P A P A P A

Research activities 334,950.00 232,545.82 201,600.00 109,794.32 6,306,135.60 3,642,503.6 93.9% 96.6%


0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0% 0%


0,00 0,00 16,560.00 11,501.34 410,400.00 194,449.16 6.1% 3.4%

Other activities 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0% 0%

Total Beneficiaries 334,950.00 232,545.82 218,160.00 121,295.66 6,716,535.60 3,836,952.76 100% 100%


Activity Type P1 - CONTI P2 - fka P3 - RENAULT P4 - ZF P5 - IDIADA

P A P A P A P A P A

Research activities 0,00 0,00 252,504.27 203,689.61 431,211.15 246,826.04 377,921.41 430,390.79 237,666.47 144,815.94


Management activities 65,698.33 42,350.01 27,356.67 17,527.03 1,333.33 0,00 7,445.00 0,00 3,300.00 1,441.20


Total Beneficiaries 65,698.33 42,350.01 279,860.94 221,216.64 432,544.49 246,826.04 385,366.41 430,390.79 240,966.47 146,257.14

Table 23 - Actual and estimated Costs per Activity Type per Beneficiary for the Period (in EURO)

Activity Type P6 - CTHA P7 - NOVTNO-T P8 - ICOOR P9 - Conti Auto P10 - Conti Teve



2012-Jan-31 Page 74 of 83

P A P A P A P A P A

Research activities 116,413.45 90,599.59 174,895.62 135,087.00 32,546.67 21,327.63 267,530.83 276,598.79 496,688.49 496,588.62


Management activities 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 6,480.00 2,940.02 3,850.00 0,00 666.67 0,00


Total Beneficiaries 116,413.45 90,599.59 174,895.62 135,087.00 39,026.67 24,267.65 271,380.83 276,598.79 497,355.16 496,588.62




2012-Jan-31 Page 75 of 83

Activity Type P11 - Conti Temi P12 - UNIMORE Total Costs % of total costs

P A P A P A P A

Research activities 233,887.50 186,030.00 89,803.64 72,162.18 2,711,069.50 2,304,116.19 95.7% 98.5%


0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0% 0%


0,00 0,00 5,520.00 4,552.14 121,650.00 68,810.4 4.3% 1.5%

Other activities 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0% 0%

Total Beneficiaries 233,887.50 186,030.00 95,323.64 76,714.32 2,832,719.50 2,372,926.59 100% 100%




2012-Jan-31 Page 76 of 83

WP Activity

Type Item description Amount Explanations

WP 1 MGNT Personnel Costs 34,989.20 € Personnel Costs for Management

WP 1 MGNT Travel and Subsistence 259.48 € ID4EV Steering Committee Meeting 23.02-24.02.2011, Reggio Emillia, Italy Patrick Spall

WP 1 MGNT Travel and Subsistence 488.30 € ID4EV First Review Meeting, 11.05.2011-12.05.2011 Brussels, Patrick Spall

WP 1 MGNT Travel and Subsistence 536.32 € ERTRAC Event , ID4Ev presentation, Brussels 30.05.-01.06.2011, Patrick Spall

WP 1 MGNT Travel and Subsistence 64.67 € ID4EV presentation; 30.06.2011, Berlin, Patrick Spall

WP 1 MGNT Travel and Subsistence 202.34 € ID4EV Steering Committee Meeting 05.09.07.09.2011, Aubevoye, France, Patrick Spall

MGNT Indirect Costs 5,809.70 € Overhead Costs for WP1

TOTAL COSTS AS CLAIMED ON FORM C

42,350.01 €

Table 26 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for Conti for the Period

WP Activity


WP 2 RTD Personnel Costs 12,824.99 € WP2 personnel costs



Subtotal RTD Personnel Costs 130,039.85 €

WP 2 RTD Travel and Subsistence 394.18 € Review Meeting in Brussels; 2011-05-11 to 2011-05-12; C. Förster

WP 2 RTD Travel and Subsistence 366.99 € Steering Committee Meeting in Aubevoye; 2011-09-05 to 2011-09-07; C. Förster

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 514.68 € WP 4 Meeting at Idiada; 2011-04-12 to 2011-04-13; C. Förster

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 57.00 € WP 4 Meeting in Stuttgart; 2011-05-16; C. Förster

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 261.00 € WP 4 Meeting in Schweinfurt; 2011-11-25; C. Förster

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 19.92 € WP 4 meeting at fka; 2011-03-09; lunch

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 17.23 € WP 4 meeting at fka; 2011-07-26; lunch

WP 5 RTD Travel and Subsistence 272.16 € WP 5 Meeting in Babenhausen; 2011-08-29 to 2011-09-01; Q. Huang



2012-Jan-31 Page 77 of 83

WP 5 RTD Travel and Subsistence 495.40 € Steering Committee Meeting in Aubevoye; 2011-09-06 to 2011-09-07; Q. Huang

WP 5 RTD Travel and Subsistence 521.09 € WP 5 Meeting in Babenhausen; 2011-10-17 to 2011-10-19; Q. Huang

WP 5 RTD Travel and Subsistence 260.28 € WP 5 Meeting in Babenhausen; 2011-11-08 to 2011-11-09; M. El Ghaouty

WP 5 RTD Travel and Subsistence 260.10 € WP 5 Meeting in Babenhausen; 2011-11-14 to 2011-11-15; M. El Ghaouty

Subtotal RTD Travel and Subsistence 3,440.03 €

WP 4 RTD Consumables 101.31 € damper assembly for demonstrator vehicle

WP 4 RTD Consumables 217.16 € rear axle for demonstrator vehicle

Subtotal RTD Consumables 318.47 €

WP 1 MGNT Personnel Costs 8,074.99 € WP1 personnel costs

WP 7 MGNT Personnel Costs 3,325.00 € WP7 personnel costs

Subtotal MGNT Personnel Costs 11,399.99 €

RTD Indirect Costs 69,891.26 € personnel costs WP 2, WP4, WP5

MGNT Indirect Costs 6,127.04 € personnel costs WP1, WP7


221,216.64 €

Table 27 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for fka for the Period

WP Activity


WP 3, WP 6

RTD Personnel Costs 113,217.32 €

RTD Indirect Costs 133,608.72 € Overheads including travels


246,826.04 €

Table 28 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for RENAULT for the Period

WP Activity


WP 3 RTD Personnel Costs 844.77 € WP3 Personnel Costs

WP 3 RTD Personnel Costs 38,488.46 € WP2 Personnel Costs

WP 4 RTD Personnel Costs 272,214.00 € WP4 Personnel Costs


WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 418.98 € WP4 Meeting FKA Aachen 09.03.11 - Thomas Kopp



2012-Jan-31 Page 78 of 83

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 192.79 € Steering Group Meeting Iccor Regio Emilia 23.02.11 - Dominik Vogt

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 150.52 € WP4 Meeting IDIADA Barcelona 13.04.2011- Dr. Horst Krimmel

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 346.93 € WP4 Meeting IDIADA Barcelona 13.04.2011- Thomas Kopp

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 792.56 € Review Meeting EU Brüssel 12.05.11 - Thomas Kopp

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 173.78 € WP4 Meeting Stuttgart 16.05.11 - Thomas Kopp

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 211.44 € WP4.3 Meeting ZF Dielingen 28.04.2011 - Thomas Kopp

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 76.32 € WP4.2 Meeting with ZF Schweinfurt 05.07.11 - Thomas Kopp

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 331.44 € WP4.3 Meeting ZF Dielingen Misuse-Tests 15.07.11 - Thomas Kopp

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 275.92 € WP4 Meeting FKA Aachen 26.7.11 - Thomas Kopp

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 1,078.89 € Steering Group Meeting Renault Paris 07.09.11 - Thomas Kopp

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 260.63 € WP4.3 Meeting ZF Dielingen 31.08.2011 - Thomas Kopp


WP 4 RTD Consumables 120.47 € Materials for Cable Bending Test Bench

RTD Indirect Costs 114,412.89 € WP2, WP3, WP4 Personnel Costs


430,390.79 €

Table 29 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for ZF for the Period

WP Activity


WP 3 RTD Personnel Costs 70,468.48 € WP3 Personnel Costs 01.03.11 - 30.11.11




WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 444.03 € Meeting @ FKA JWEBB

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 497.01 € Meeting @ Stuttgart JWEBB

WP 4 RTD Travel and Subsistence 409.88 € Meeting @ Aachen JWEBB

WP 6 RTD Travel and Subsistence 105.90 € Meeting @ ICCOR

WP 6 RTD Travel and Subsistence 385.10 € Meeting @ Aubevoye SBOLTSHAUSER



2012-Jan-31 Page 79 of 83


WP 6 RTD Access Costs 368.62 € Meeting @ Aubevoye AESCUER

WP 3 RTD Consumables 1,370.00 € Vehicle hire for WP3.6

WP 7 MGNT Personnel Costs 1,201.00 € WP7 Personnel Costs 01.03.11 - 30.11.11

RTD Indirect Costs 23,846.22 € Standard Flat Rate (20%)

MGNT Indirect Costs 240.20 € Standard Flat Rate (20%)


146,257.14 €

Table 30 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for IDIADA for the Period

WP Activity


WP 2, WP 6

RTD Personnel Costs 24,817.93 € Senior Researcher

WP 2 RTD Travel and Subsistence 2,129.20 € Aachen Colloquium, Aachen Germany 10.10.2011 Mathias Lidberg

WP 3 RTD Access Costs 29,677.60 € Senior Researcher

RTD Indirect Costs 33,974.86 € Special Transition Flat Rate (60%)


90,599.59 €

Table 31 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for CTHA for the Period

WP Activity


WP 2, WP 3, WP 5

RTD Personnel Costs 52,262.00 € Direct cost of man months

WP 2 RTD Travel and Subsistence 109.00 € Visit Aachener Kolloquium

WP 3 RTD Travel and Subsistence 576.00 € Travel cost VSE meeting Frankfurt

WP 3 RTD Travel and Subsistence 1,015.00 € Travel cost 2 day ATP test track

WP 3 RTD Travel and Subsistence 973.00 € M16 Steering Committee meeting Aubevoye

WP 5 RTD Travel and Subsistence 87.00 € Visit to fka


WP 3 RTD Consumables 2,360.00 € Usage of test track ATP

WP 3 RTD Consumables 560.00 € Tires for test vehicle

Subtotal RTD Consumables 2,920.00 €

RTD Indirect Costs 77,145.00 € man months


135,087.00 €

Table 32 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for NOVTNO-T for the Period



2012-Jan-31 Page 80 of 83

WP Activity


WP 6 RTD Personnel Costs 6,599.34 € Salary of 3 young researcher for 3 MM

WP 5 RTD Personnel Costs 2,549.73 € Salary of 1 young researcher for 1.25 MM


WP 5 RTD Travel and Subsistence 3,485.15 € Travel to participate to project meeting and workshop

WP 5 RTD Subcontracting 1,112.88 € Catering and Dinner for WP5 Workshop in Reggio Emilia in February 2011

WP 7 MGNT Personnel Costs 1,837.51 € salary of one young researcher for 1.25 MM


MGNT Indirect Costs 1,102.51 € Special Transition Flat Rate (60%)


24,267.65 €

Table 33 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for ICOOR for the Period

WP Activity


WP 2 RTD Personnel Costs 2,246.88 € Personnel Costs for Task 2.1

WP 5 RTD Personnel Costs 197,366.37 € Personnel Costs for Task 5.3


WP 5 RTD Consumables 11,000.00 € Ecran Tactile Complet

WP 5 RTD Consumables 2,540.54 € Debug HW for Fado Process

WP 5 RTD Consumables 5,663.00 € Other Consumables for Task 5.3


RTD Indirect Costs 57,782.00 € Indirect costs for Tasks 2.1 and Task 5.3


276,598,79 €

Table 34 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for Conti Auto for the Period

WP Activity


WP 2 RTD Personnel Costs 8,459.17 € WP2 personnel direct costs






2012-Jan-31 Page 81 of 83


WP 6 RTD Travel and Subsistence 546.52 € ID4EV WP6 kick-off meeting 13.12-15.12.2010, Aubevoye, France, Dr. Thomas Raste; costs were recorded on the project in march 2011.

WP 6 RTD Travel and Subsistence 2,395.80 € ID4EV wintertesting 07.03-21.03.2011, Sweden, Arvidsjaur, Chen Zhenfu

WP 3 RTD Travel and Subsistence 2,804.00 € ID4EV LM-tests 07.03.-25.03.2011

Sweden, Arvidsjaur, Schmitz Daniel

WP 3 RTD Travel and Subsistence 1,587.44 € ID4EV test and development 07.03-

18.03.2011, Sweden, Arvidsjaur, Dr.

Thomas Raste

WP 3 RTD Travel and Subsistence 674,26 € ID4EV Steering Committee Meeting

23.02-24.02.2011, Italy, Dr. Thomas

Raste

WP 6 RTD Travel and Subsistence 986.88 € Vehicle launch 23.05-17.05.2011

Aubevoye, France, Schmitz Daniel

WP 3 RTD Travel and Subsistence 828.06 € Vehicle launch 25.05.-27.05.2011, France, Aubevoye, Baier Robert

WP 3 RTD Travel and Subsistence 670.60 € ID4EV Review Meeting 12.05.2011, Brussels, Dr. Thomas Raste

WP 3 RTD Travel and Subsistence 607.63 € ID4EV Steering Committee Meeting; Workshops 05.09.-07.09.2011, Aubevoye, France, Schmitz Daniel

WP 3 RTD Travel and Subsistence 805.33 € ID4EV Steering Committee Meeting; Workshops 05.09.-07.09.2011, Aubevoye, France, Dr. Thomas Raste


WP 3 RTD Other Specific Costs 1,568.22 € Vehicle transport to Sweden for testing

WP 3 RTD Other Specific Costs 420.00 € Vehicle transport to Sweden for testing

WP 3 RTD Consumables 68.52 € Electrician protective gloves

WP 3 RTD Consumables 490.10 € accumulator

WP 3 RTD Consumables 4,150.00 € Drum brakes


RTD Indirect Costs 94,707.59 € Overhead (indirect costs) for WP 2, WP3, WP4, WP 6


496,588.62 €

Table 35 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for Conti Teves for the Period



2012-Jan-31 Page 82 of 83

WP Activity


WP 5 RTD Personnel Costs 128,384.00 € Direct Costs, March-November 2011

RTD Indirect Costs 49,820.00 € Indirect Costs March-November 2011

OTHER Indirect Costs 7,826.00 € Travel costs, samples, March-November 2011


186,030.00 €

Table 36 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for Conti Temi for the Period

WP Activity


WP 3 RTD Personnel Costs 3,967.62 € Salary of 2 young researcher for 2.44 MM

WP 5 RTD Personnel Costs 24,868.60 € Salary of 1 full professor for 1,72 MM, Salary of 2 young researcher for 3MM, salary of 2 senior researcher for 1MM

WP 6 RTD Personnel Costs 16,265.14 € Salary of 1 full professor for 0.6 MM, salary of 1 young researcher for 0.6 MM, Salary of 2 senior researcher for 1.8 MM


WP 7 MGNT Personnel Costs 2,845.09 € Salary of 2 young researcher for 1.74 MM


MGNT Indirect Costs 1,707.05 € Special Transition Flat Rate (60%)


76,714.32 €

Table 37 - Personnel, Subcontracting and other major cost items for UNIMORE for the Period



2012-Jan-31 Page 83 of 83

6. Certificates

Beneficiary Number

Beneficiary short name

Certificate on the financial

statements provided?

Any useful comment, in particular if a certificate is not provided

1 (CO) CONTI No Not required for this period

2 fka No Not required for this period

3 RENAULT No Not required for this period

4 ZF No Not required for this period

5 IDIADA No Not required for this period

6 CTHA No Not required for this period

7 NOVTNO-T No Not required for this period

8 ICOOR No Not required for this period

9 Conti Auto No Not required for this period

10 Conti Teve No Not required for this period

11 Conti Temi No Not required for this period

12 UNIMORE No Not required for this period

Beneficiary Number

Beneficiary short name

Certificate on the methodology

provided?

Any useful comment, in particular if a certificate is not provided

1 (CO) CONTI No

2 fka No

3 RENAULT No

4 ZF No

5 IDIADA No

6 CTHA No

7 NOVTNO-T No

8 ICOOR No

9 Conti Auto No

10 Conti Teve No

11 Conti Temi No

12 UNIMORE No

Date post:	02-Jan-2017
Category:	Documents
Upload:	nguyenanh
View:	216 times
Download:	1 times

PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT

Documents