Date post: | 28-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | royal-projects |
View: | 680 times |
Download: | 1 times |
BALANCED SCORECARD
Human Resource Development
BALANCED SCORECARD
Prepared by:
Submitted to:
2
I N D E X
Sr. No. Particulars Page. No.
1 INTRODUCTION: Balanced Scorecard 4
2 NEED FOR THE BALANCED SCORECARD 6
3 4 MAJOR PERSPECTIVES OF A BSC 9
4 The Four Perspectives: Cause and Effect relationship 12
5 BUILDING AND IMPLEMENTING THE SYSTEM USING A BALANCED SCORECARD
17
6 THE BSC MODEL 20
7 FEATURES OF A GOOD BSC 23
8 ADVANTAGES OF BSC 24
9 DISADVANTAGES OF BSC 25
10 UTILISING THE BALANCED SCORECARD AS A STRATEGIC
MANAGEMENT TOOL
26
11 CONCLUSION 29
12 REFERENCES 30
INTRODUCTION: Balanced Scorecard
3
Companies today are in the midst of a revolutionary transformation as Industrial age
competition is shifting to Information age competition. The cut-throat competition that
businesses faced in the last two decades has made them to look for improvement
initiatives like Total Quality Management, Just-in-Time (JIT) systems; Activity based
cost management, Employee empowerment and Re-engineering. Though these
initiatives resulted in enhanced shareholder value, their structure was disjointed and
focused on the short-term survival and growth. The programs centered on achieving
breakthrough performance merely by monitoring and controlling financial measures of
past performance. This collision between the irresistible force to build long-range
competitive capabilities and the immovable object of the historical-cost financial
accounting model has led to a new blend the Balanced scorecard.
The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that is
used extensively in business and industry, government, and nonprofit organizations
worldwide to align business activities to the vision and strategy of the organization,
improve internal and external communications, and monitor organization performance
against strategic goals. It was originated by Drs. Robert Kaplan (Harvard Business
School) and David Norton as a performance measurement framework that added
strategic non-financial performance measures to traditional financial metrics to give
managers and executives a more 'balanced' view of organizational performance. While
the phrase BALANCED SCORECARD was coined in the early 1990s, the roots of the this
type of approach are deep, and include the pioneering work of General Electric on
performance measurement reporting in the 1950’s and the work of French process
engineers (who created the TABLEAU DE BORD – literally, a "dashboard" of
performance measures) in the early part of the 20th century.
The balanced scorecard has evolved from its early use as a simple performance
measurement framework to a full strategic planning and management system. The
“new” balanced scorecard transforms an organization’s strategic plan from an attractive
but passive document into the "marching orders" for the organization on a daily basis. It
provides a framework that not only provides performance measurements, but helps
planners identify what should be done and measured. It enables executives to truly
execute their strategies.
4
This new approach to strategic management was first detailed in a series of articles and
books by Drs. Kaplan and Norton. Recognizing some of the weaknesses and vagueness
of previous management approaches, the balanced scorecard approach provides a clear
prescription as to what companies should measure in order to 'balance' the financial
perspective. The balanced scorecard is a management system (not only a measurement
system) that enables organizations to clarify their vision and strategy and translate
them into action. It provides feedback around both the internal business processes and
external outcomes in order to continuously improve strategic performance and results.
When fully deployed, the balanced scorecard transforms strategic planning from an
academic exercise into the nerve center of an enterprise.
In a nutshell, the need to link financial and non-financial measures of performance and
identifying key performance measures led to the emergence of “Balanced Score Card”
approach developed by Norton and Kaplan (1992) in the U.S. The Balanced score card is
defined as “an approach to the provision of information to management to assist
strategic policy formulation and achievement. It emphasized the need to provide the
user with a set of information, which addresses all relevant areas of performance in an
objective and unbiased fashion”.
Kaplan and Norton identified four perspectives representing the important facets of
the organization. These were:
1. Financial perspective (how do we look to shareholders)
2. Customer perspective (how the customer see us)
3. Internal business perspective (what we excel at?)
4. Innovation & Learning perspective (can we continue to improve and create
value)
The idea behind the four perspectives represents a balanced view of any organization
and by creating measures under each of these headings all the important areas of
business would be covered. It is important to note that the balanced score card itself is
just a frame work and it doesn’t say what the specific measures should be. It is a matter
5
for people within the organization to decide upon. The set of measures for each
organization or even sections with the organization will be different. Much of the
success of score card depends on how the measures are agreed, the way they are
implemented and how they are acted upon. So the process of designing a score card is
as important as the score card itself.
6
NEED FOR THE BALANCED SCORECARD (BSC)
The balanced scorecard is a way of Measuring organizational, business unit or
department success;
Balancing long and short term actions;
Balancing different measures of success and
o Financial
o Customer
o Internal Operations
o Human Resource Systems & Development (Learning & growth)
A way of tying strategy to measures of action
The Need for the scorecard
The objective of any measurement system should be to motivate all managers and
employees to implement successfully the business units strategy. Those companies that
can translate their strategy into measurement system will be able to execute their
strategy because they communicate their objectives and their targets. The
communication makes managers and employees focus on the critical drivers enabling
them to align investments, initiatives and actions accomplishing strategic goals.
Historically, the measurement system for any business has been financial. Accounting
was considered to be the language of business .Innovations in measuring the financial
performance of the industrial age companies played a vital role in their successful
growth. And financial innovations, such as the Return on Investment (ROI) metric, and
operating and cash budgets, were critical to the success of these corporations.
However, an over emphasis on achieving and maintaining short-term financial results
can cause companies to over invest in short-term fixes and to under invest in long-term
value creation, particularly in the intangible and intellectual assets that generate future
growth. The pressure for short-term financial performance often causes companies to
7
reduce the resources spent on new product development, process improvements,
human resource development, Information technology, databases and systems as well
as customer and market development. In the short run, the financial accounting model
reports these spending cutbacks as increases in reported income, even when the
reductions have cannibalized a company’s stock of assets and its capabilities for
creating future economic value. In short, these organizations use the financial and non-
financial performance only for tactical feedback and control of short-term operations.
Linking Strategy with Performance Measures
The essential thrust of the balanced scorecard is based on the fundamental proposition
that within organizations what gets measured gets done however, organizations dont
always get what they measure. If measurement, by itself, had that much impact on
human behavior, then anyone that had weighing scales would never get fat.
An appropriate measurement system is one that energizes employees in the context of
what the organization is trying to do. Thus, the logical starting point for the
development of any performance measurement system for an organization must be a
clear statement of mission, objectives and resultant strategy. An organization’s mission
is its basic function in society and is the reason why the organization exists. Related to
this are the objectives to be achieved and they represent a precise statement of purpose
for a specific period. Basically a strategy is a shared understanding about how the
organization’s mission is to be achieved in a competitive environment. Strategic
thinking will focus on customers and competitors as well as internal capabilities and
resources. It will include reference to the firm’s competitiveness, quality of output and
levels of customer service. In turn, specified performance measures allow all employees
understand what the strategy is and how their performance is linked to that overall
strategy. The relationship between Mission, Objectives, Strategy and Performance
Measures is depicted in Fig.1.
8
Fig.1
There are at least three reasons why organizations should, and often do, measure their
performance:
1. To align mission, strategy, values and behavior
2. To improve the right things
3. To numerically define the meaning of success
9
4 MAJOR PERSPECTIVES OF A BSC
The aim of the Balanced Scorecard is to direct, help manage and change in support of
the longer-term strategy in order to manage performance. The scorecard reflects what
the company and the strategies are all about. It acts as a catalyst for bringing in the
‘change’ element within the organization. This tool is a comprehensive framework
which considers the following perspectives and tries to get answers to the following
questions –
1. Financial Perspective - How do we look at shareholders?
2. Customer Perspective - How should we appear to our customers?
3. Internal Business Processes Perspective - What must we excel at?
4. Learning and Growth Perspective - Can we continue to improve and create value?
Hence, from the above lines we can say that this tool has considered not only the
financial results to be important but also those factors which actually drive an
organization towards future successes as mentioned earlier. The tool has given stress
on the other areas which are required to ‘balance’ the financial perspective in order to
get a total view about the organizational performance and improve the same. The
framework tries to bring a balance and linkage between the –
(a) Financial and the Non-Financial indicators,
(b) Tangible and the Intangible measures,
(c) Internal and the External aspects and
(d) Leading and the Lagging indicators.
The Learning & Growth Perspective
10
This perspective includes employee training and corporate cultural attitudes related to
both individual and corporate self-improvement. In a knowledge-worker organization,
people -- the only repository of knowledge -- are the main resource. In the current
climate of rapid technological change, it is becoming necessary for knowledge workers
to be in a continuous learning mode. Government agencies often find themselves unable
to hire new technical workers, and at the same time there is a decline in training of
existing employees. This is a leading indicator of 'brain drain' that must be reversed.
Metrics can be put into place to guide managers in focusing training funds where they
can help the most. In any case, learning and growth constitute the essential foundation
for success of any knowledge-worker organization.
Kaplan and Norton emphasize that 'learning' is more than 'training'; it also includes
things like mentors and tutors within the organization, as well as that ease of
communication among workers that allows them to readily get help on a problem when
it is needed. It also includes technological tools.
The Business Process Perspective
This perspective refers to internal business processes. Metrics based on this perspective
allow the managers to know how well their business is running, and whether its
products and services conform to customer requirements (the mission). These metrics
have to be carefully designed by those who know these processes most intimately; with
our unique missions these are not something that can be developed by outside
consultants.
In addition to the strategic management process, two kinds of business processes may
be identified: a) mission-oriented processes, and b) support processes. Mission-
oriented processes are the special functions of government offices, and many unique
problems are encountered in these processes. The support processes are more
repetitive in nature, and hence easier to measure and benchmark using generic metrics.
The Customer Perspective
Recent management philosophy has shown an increasing realization of the importance
of customer focus and customer satisfaction in any business. These are leading
11
indicators: if customers are not satisfied, they will eventually find other suppliers that
will meet their needs. Poor performance from this perspective is thus a leading
indicator of future decline, even though the current financial picture may look good.
In developing metrics for satisfaction, customers should be analyzed in terms of kinds of
customers and the kinds of processes for which we are providing a product or service to
those customer groups.
The Financial Perspective
Kaplan and Norton do not disregard the traditional need for financial data. Timely and
accurate funding data will always be a priority, and managers will do whatever
necessary to provide it. In fact, often there is more than enough handling and processing
of financial data. With the implementation of a corporate database, it is hoped that more
of the processing can be centralized and automated. But the point is that the current
emphasis on financials leads to the "unbalanced" situation with regard to other
perspectives.
There is perhaps a need to include additional financial-related data, such as risk assessment
and cost-benefit data, in this category.
The Four Perspectives: Cause and Effect Relationship
The four perspectives as mentioned above are highly interlinked. There is a logical
connection between them. The explanation is as follows : If an organization focuses on
the learning and the growth aspect, it is definitely going to lead to better business
processes. This in turn would be followed by increased customer value by producing
better products which ultimately gives rise to improved financial performance.
12
A strategy is a set of hypotheses about cause and effect. The chain of cause-and- effect
should pervade all four perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard therefore a properly
constructed Balanced Score Card should tell the story of the company's strategy.(figure
2)
13
Figure 2
Performance Drivers
A good Balanced Score Card should also have a mix of outcome measures (lagging
indicators) and performance drivers (leading indicators). Outcome measures without
performance drivers do not communicate how the outcomes are to be achieved or give
an early indication about whether the strategy is being implemented successfully.
Conversely performance drivers without outcome measures (may achieve short term
operational improvements) fail to reveal whether operational improvements have
translated into expanded business with enhanced financial performance. Example
(Figure 3)
14
Figure 3
A completed organizational score card needs to have the following components:
Strategic Themes Identified
Strategic Objectives Identified
Measures for the execution of the strategic objectives
Competitive Bench Marks for the measures selected
Short Term and Long term targets for identified measures
Initiatives aligned to the Strategic objectives for execution and review.
15
Once the organizational score card is prepared and finalized the scorecard is to be used
as an effective method of alignment see (figure 4). Departmental, Process, and
Individual score cards aligned to corporate score card will translate your strategy to
daily management.
Links to Six Sigma
Six Sigma is a unique variability reduction management strategy for Business
improvement. The most powerful aspect of Six Sigma is in the application of the
rigorous DMAIC philosophy to projects to achieve higher customer satisfaction and
Business results. While Six Sigma helps organizations in elimination of waste in their
pursuit to excellence the Balanced Score Card lays the foundation for the
implementation of an effective Six Sigma strategy.
When one attempts to view the evolution of various measurement systems you could
see that Balanced Score Card encompasses Financial, Strategic and Operational
measurements. See (Figure 5).It is clear to visualize that implementation of Balanced
Score Card followed by the deployment of Six Sigma is a better approach towards Six
16
Sigma deployment. While the proven statistical tool set of Six Sigma operates at the
operational level the Balanced Score Card provides the rationale for identification of
areas for improvement.
BUILDING AND IMPLEMENTING THE SYSTEM USING A BALANCED SCORECARD
17
Step One of the scorecard building process starts with an assessment of the
organization’s Mission and Vision, challenges (pains), enablers, and values. Step One
also includes preparing a change management plan for the organization, and conducting
a focused communications workshop to identify key messages, media outlets, timing,
and messengers.
In Step Two, elements of the organization’s strategy, including Strategic Results,
Strategic Themes, and Perspectives, are developed by workshop participants to focus
attention on customer needs and the organization’s value proposition.
In Step Three, the strategic elements developed in Steps One and Two are decomposed
into Strategic Objectives, which are the basic building blocks of strategy and define the
organization's strategic intent. Objectives are first initiated and categorized on the
Strategic Theme level, categorized by Perspective, linked in cause-effect linkages
18
(Strategy Maps) for each Strategic Theme, and then later merged together to produce
one set of Strategic Objectives for the entire organization.
In Step Four, the cause and effect linkages between the enterprise-wide Strategic
Objectives are formalized in an enterprise-wide Strategy Map. The previously
constructed theme Strategy Maps are merged into an overall enterprise-wide Strategy
Map that shows how the organization creates value for its customers and stakeholders.
In Step Five, Performance Measures are developed for each of the enterprise-wide
Strategic Objectives. Leading and lagging measures are identified, expected targets and
thresholds are established, and baseline and benchmarking data is developed.
In Step Six, Strategic Initiatives are developed that support the Strategic Objectives. To
build accountability throughout the organization, ownership of Performance Measures
and Strategic Initiatives is assigned to the appropriate staff and documented in data
definition tables.
In Step Seven, the implementation process begins by applying performance
measurement software to get the right performance information to the right people at
the right time. Automation adds structure and discipline to implementing the Balanced
Scorecard system, helps transform disparate corporate data into information and
knowledge, and helps communicate performance information. In short, automation
helps people make better decisions because it offers quick access to actual performance
data.
In Step Eight, the enterprise-level scorecard is ‘cascaded’ down into business and support
unit scorecards, meaning the organizational level scorecard (the first Tier) is translated into
business unit or support unit scorecards (the second Tier) and then later to team and
individual scorecards (the third Tier). Cascading translates high-level strategy into lower-
level objectives, measures, and operational details. Cascading is the key to organization
alignment around strategy.
Team and individual scorecards link day-to-day work with department goals and corporate
vision. Cascading is the key to organization alignment around strategy. Performance
measures are developed for all objectives at all organization levels. As the scorecard
19
management system is cascaded down through the organization, objectives become more
operational and tactical, as do the performance measures. Accountability follows the
objectives and measures, as ownership is defined at each level. An emphasis on results and
the strategies needed to produce results is communicated throughout the organization.
In Step Nine, an Evaluation of the completed scorecard is done. During this evaluation, the
organization tries to answer questions such as, ‘Are our strategies working?’, ‘Are we
measuring the right things?’, ‘Has our environment changed?’ and ‘Are we budgeting our
money strategically?’
THE BSC MODEL
20
The Model – An Explanation
Hence, from the aforesaid model, it is clear that the following are to be done so as to
utilize the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic management tool :
1. The major objectives are to be set for each of the perspectives.
2. Measures of performance are required to be identified under each of the objectives
which would help the organization to realize the goals set under each of the
perspectives. These would act as parameters to measure the progress towards the
objectives.
3. The next important step is the setting of specific targets around each of the identified
key areas which would act as a benchmark for performance appraisal.
Hence, a performance measurement system is build around these critical factors.Any
deviation in attaining the results should raise a red signal to the management which
would investigate the reasons for the deviation and rectify the same.
21
4. The appropriate strategies and the action plans that are to be taken in the various
activities should be decided so that it is clear as to how the organization has decided to
pursue the pre-decided goals. Because of this reason, the Balanced Scorecard is often
referred to as a blueprint of the company strategies.
An example will help to understand it better. Some of the objectives together with a
measurement measures are given below.
Hence, the above paragraphs show that all the four areas have been given equal
importance in measuring performance level. The measures and the objectives, however,
depend upon the type of business the organization is in. The financial indicators are
complemented by the non-financial ones. Since, objectives and goals are set for each of
the critical success factors under each of the heads, it brings about a focus on the
strategic vision. Thus, all activities would be directed towards achievement of the
longterm goals which have been set by the top management. The identification of the
22
key result areas (KRAs) help an organization in moving towards the right strategic
direction. This tool creates a link between objectives, measures, targets and initiatives.
It is, therefore, absolutely clear that the Balanced Scorecard acts as a focal point for the
organisation’s efforts, designing and communicating priorities to the managers,
employees, investors and the customers.
FEATURES OF A GOOD BALANCED SCORE CARD:
1. It tells the story of a company’s strategy, articulating a sequence of cause and
effect relationships.
2. It helps to communicate the strategy to all members of the organization by
translating the strategy into coherent and linked set of understandable and
measurable operation targets.
3. A balanced score card emphasizes non-financial measures as a part of program
to achieve future financial performance
23
4. The balanced score card limits the number of measures identifying only the most
critical areas. The purpose in to focus manager’s attention on measures that
most affect the implementation of strategy.
5. The balanced score card highlights less than optimal trade offs that managers
may make when they fail to consider operational and financial measures
together.
ADVANTAGES OF BSC
The balanced scorecard tool is being used by several organizations throughout the
world because of certain advantages it has been able to deliver as below:
It translates vision and strategy into action.
It defines the strategic linkages to integrate performance across organizations.
It communicates the objectives and measures to a business unit.
It aligns the strategic initiatives in order to attain the long-term goals.
It aligns everyone within an organization so that all employees understand how
they support the strategy.
It provides a basis for compensation for performance.
The scorecard provides a feedback to the senior management if the strategy is
working.
24
Focusing the whole organization on the few key things needed to create
breakthrough performance.
Helps to integrate various corporate programs. Such as: quality, re-engineering,
and customer service initiatives.
Breaking down strategic measures towards lower levels, so that unit managers,
operators, and employees can see what's required at their level to achieve
excellent overall performance.
25
DISADVANTAGES OF BSC
It is not easy to implement this tool because it involves a lot of subjectivity.
The tool is much more complex compared to the other tools
The measures that need to be taken is contingent upon the kind of environment,
industry and the business the organization is in.
A lot of refinement is still required to be done so that it becomes understandable
to every stakeholder associated with the organization.
UTILISING THE BALANCED SCORECARD AS A STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT TOOL
26
The tool has become a weapon for organizations to identify the pressure points,
conflicting interests, objectives setting, prioritization of objectives, planning and
budgeting. The four main important steps that need
to be taken care of are –
1. Translating the Vision
It is to be remembered that the vision of any
organization should be understood by each and
every employee of the organization. If it is
understood by the top management only, then it is
definite that the organization will fail to realize its
goals. Hence, before starting with the strategic implementation process, the
organizations needs to be clear about the reason for its existence, where it wants to see
itself after a certain number of years and properly decide its business definition. The
managers should build a consensus around the organisation’s vision and strategy. The
strategies, in fact, emanate from the vision and mission of the company which means
that a linkage is formed between the strategies of the different business units and the
vision of the organization. The lofty statements must be translated into an integrated set
of objectives and measures. Thus, by using this tool, the overall strategic objectives for
the company gets clarified which helps to achieve consensus across different business
units on the overall strategic objectives for the company.
2. Communicating and Linking
Just communicating the vision and the strategies is not an end in itself.
The strategic goals and the measures to be set in the different areas have to be decided
upon. The long-term strategic goals have to be translated into both departmental and
individual goals which should be aligned to each other in order to realize the long-term
goals. In fact, each and everyone at different levels in the organizational hierarchy needs
27
Tata Motors is the first Indian company to be inducted in the Balance Scorecard Hall of Fame.,Joining the thirty-member elite club of organizations including Hilton Hotels, BMW Financial Services, U.S. Army, Korea Telecom, Norwegian Air Force and the city of Brisbane for achieving excellence in company performance.
to be educated about the action plans and reasons for accepting the same. The tool
contains three levels of information:
(i) It describes the corporate objectives, measures and the targets
(ii) It helps in deciding the business unit targets and
(iii) It helps in framing the departmental and the individual objectives which will help in
attaining the objectives of the business unit directly which would lead to the attainment
of the corporate goals. The employees are given the freedom to decide their measures,
objectives and the targets attainment of which would move the organization in the right
strategic direction. Then the compensation level is linked to the performance level
which in reality involves a lot of subjectivity.
3. Business Planning
This step helps in the resource allocation process. One has to keep in mind that
objectives form an important criteria in deciding the quantum of resources that are
required to be allocated to the various departments, activities and the processes. No
strategy can bring successful results to an organization if the allocation is not in line
with what is required to meet the results. This allocation is dependent on the budgeted
estimates which are decided on the basis of the said
objectives. Hence, through this step the Balanced Scorecard tries to bring about an
integration between strategic planning and the budgeting exercise. The short-term
milestones are also needed to be figured out which in totality brings about a linkage
between strategic goals and the budgets. This procedure helps in actualizing what has
been set by the organization. Thus, this step brings about a shift from the ‘thinking’
exercise to the ‘doing’ stage and the organization tries to achieve the long-term goals
through the short-term actions.
4. Feedback and Learning
The first three steps as mentioned above help in the strategic implementation process.
But, for knowing whether the organization is in a position to achieve the strategic goals
and whether it is in the right track, the process of feedback and learning is essential. The
28
strategic learning consists of acquiring knowledge about which way the organization is
moving to, testing whether the premises considered before hold true even now and
finally making adjustments wherever required. The corrective measures are required so
that the necessary rectifications are made which will help an organization pursue the
correct path.
Another point is that an organization gets to know whether the cause-and-effect
relationships among the different perspectives really hold true, to what extent they are
strongly linked and also whether positive results are being obtained. In case, an
organization realizes the existence of a gap in the cause effect relationships, an
immediate correction would be required so that a positive relationship can be build
among the various factors. Thus, the tool with its specification of the causal
relationships between performance drivers and objectives allows corporate and the
business unit objectives executives to use their periodic review sessions in order to
evaluate the validity of the unit’s strategy and the quality of its execution. Also, this
feedback and learning exercise may force an organization to change the measures set in
each of the perspectives and adopt those, which if attained would ensure the success of
the corporate and the business strategies.
CONCLUSION
The Balanced Scorecard is therefore a very important strategic management tool which
helps an organization to not only measure the performance but also decide the
strategies which are needed to be adopted so that the long-term goals are achieved.
Thus, in other words, the application of this tool ensures the consistency of vision and
action which is the first step towards the development of a successful organization.
Also, its proper implementation can ensure the development of competencies within an
organization which will help it to develop a competitive advantage without which it
cannot expect to outperform its rivals.
29
REFERENCES
www.valuebasedmanagement.net.
http://en.wikipedia.org
www.thebalancedscorecard.com
www.managementhelp.org
ucsfhr.ucsf.edu/files/implementationguide.doc
www.managementparadise.com
www.citehr.com
30