+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Project Stockpile Volume Estimates Date · Tor Land Resource Inc. 26 August 2011 Kroetsch Stockpile...

Project Stockpile Volume Estimates Date · Tor Land Resource Inc. 26 August 2011 Kroetsch Stockpile...

Date post: 13-Aug-2019
Category:
Upload: phungkhanh
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
4
Tor Land Resource Inc. 26 August 2011 Kroetsch Stockpile Volume Estimates NW-9-31-3-W5M Page 1 of 4 Project Stockpile Volume Estimates Ritchie Brothers Darcy Kroetsch’s Stockpiles Date August 26, 2011 Objective Estimate the volume of six gravel stockpiles at the gravel pit in the LLD below. A seventh gravel stockpile was measured at the request of the owner of the material, Darcy Kroetsch. Evaluator H.D. Budney P.Geol. LLD NW-9-31-3-W5M Site Visit On August 17 and 23rd, 2011, Tor Land Resource Inc. was on site and took measurements necessary for estimating the volume of gravel stockpiles. Mr. Kroetsch was on site on August 17 and indicated the stockpiles to be measured. The weather conditions on both days were favourable. During the site visit on August 17th, gravel was being hauled from Stockpiles 5 and 6 (Map 1); on August 23 rd , from Stockpile 6. Methodology The bases of the piles were tracked by GPS. As necessary, waypoint locations were taken to define the shape or combination of shapes that formed each stockpile. Heights of the materials were measured with a rangefinder. For the cases where an irregular surface was observed (i.e., multiple peaks), measurements of peaks and valleys were recorded and averaged to one height. Slopes of the stockpiles were measured using the rangefinder. Two methods were used: 1) measuring the slope (inclination) directly with the rangefinder and 2) calculating the slope based on a horizontal and vertical distance. When compared, these two methods resulted in slopes varying up to approximately 5 degrees, resulting in minimal variation in the volume. The material type was estimated visually in the pit, and correlated with the owner descriptions. In estimating the volumes, each stockpile is conceptualized as either a single or combination of three-dimensional shapes. Measurements were taken to describe the shape(s) of each pile in three dimensions. The volume of each stockpile is estimated by calculating the volume of the shape(s). Field Equipment Garmin GPSmap 60CSx; Laser Technology Inc. TruPulse 200 rangefinder Field Results Seven stockpiles were measured (Map 1 and Table 1). These seven stockpiles are conceptualized as ten shapes for volume estimates (Map 2 and Table 2).
Transcript

Tor Land Resource Inc. 26 August 2011

Kroetsch Stockpile Volume Estimates NW-9-31-3-W5M Page 1 of 4

Project Stockpile Volume Estimates

Ritchie Brothers –

Darcy Kroetsch’s Stockpiles

Date August 26, 2011

Objective Estimate the volume of six gravel stockpiles at the gravel pit in the LLD below. A

seventh gravel stockpile was measured at the request of the owner of the

material, Darcy Kroetsch.

Evaluator H.D. Budney P.Geol. LLD NW-9-31-3-W5M

Site Visit

On August 17 and 23rd, 2011, Tor Land Resource Inc. was on site and took

measurements necessary for estimating the volume of gravel stockpiles. Mr.

Kroetsch was on site on August 17 and indicated the stockpiles to be measured.

The weather conditions on both days were favourable.

During the site visit on August 17th, gravel was being hauled from Stockpiles 5

and 6 (Map 1); on August 23rd, from Stockpile 6.

Methodology

The bases of the piles were tracked by GPS. As necessary, waypoint locations

were taken to define the shape or combination of shapes that formed each

stockpile.

Heights of the materials were measured with a rangefinder. For the cases

where an irregular surface was observed (i.e., multiple peaks), measurements

of peaks and valleys were recorded and averaged to one height.

Slopes of the stockpiles were measured using the rangefinder. Two methods

were used: 1) measuring the slope (inclination) directly with the rangefinder

and 2) calculating the slope based on a horizontal and vertical distance. When

compared, these two methods resulted in slopes varying up to approximately 5

degrees, resulting in minimal variation in the volume.

The material type was estimated visually in the pit, and correlated with the

owner descriptions.

In estimating the volumes, each stockpile is conceptualized as either a single or

combination of three-dimensional shapes. Measurements were taken to

describe the shape(s) of each pile in three dimensions. The volume of each

stockpile is estimated by calculating the volume of the shape(s).

Field Equipment Garmin GPSmap 60CSx; Laser Technology Inc. TruPulse 200 rangefinder

Field Results Seven stockpiles were measured (Map 1 and Table 1). These seven stockpiles

are conceptualized as ten shapes for volume estimates (Map 2 and Table 2).

Tor Land Resource Inc. 26 August 2011

Kroetsch Stockpile Volume Estimates NW-9-31-3-W5M Page 2 of 4

Map 1 Locations of measured stockpiles

Table 1 Summary of stockpile volume estimates

Stockpile No.

Material (Kroetsch

Classification)

Volume Est. (Tor Land)

m3 yd3* tonnes** ***

1 ¾ inch screened 3,744 4,897 6,110+/-

2 3/8 inch natural rock 627 820 1,023+/-

3 ½ inch natural rock 1,629 2,131 2,659+/-

4 ¾ inch road base (off-spec, too much sand) 4,948 6,472 8,076+/-

5 3 inch crush 7,749 10,135 12,646+/-

6 ¾ inch road 7,774 10,168 12,687+/-

7 not provided 881 1,153 1,438+/- * Conversion factor for cubic metres to yards is 1.308

** Conversion factor for cubic metres to tonnes is 1.632

*** +/- up to 20% is sometimes put forward by industry as potential loss and degradation at the base of a stockpile.

1

2

3

4

5 6 7

N Aug 2011 Stockpile Shapes

2009 Air Photo (note change from 2009 to 2011)

Tor Land Resource Inc. 26 August 2011

Kroetsch Stockpile Volume Estimates NW-9-31-3-W5M Page 3 of 4

Map 2 Locations of 3D shapes for calculating stockpile volume estimates

Table 2 Details of stockpile volume estimates

Stockpile No. Shape No. Shape

Base Area (m2)

Top Area (m2)

Height (m)

Width (m)

Length (m) Shape Volume (m3)

1 S1 frustum 1,203 297 5.4 --- --- 3,744

2 S2

frustum 384 26 3.7 --- --- 627

3 S3

frustum 758 87 4.4 --- --- 1,629

4 S4a ridge 833 --- 7.6 23 41.2 2,643

S4b pyramid 516 --- 5.7 -- --

980

S4c oblique wedge

--- --- 21.4* 9.9 12.5, 5.3

1,070

S4d tetrahedron 100 --- 15.3* --- --- 255

5 S5 frustum 1,782 51 10.9 --- --- 7,749

6 S6 frustum 2,017 803 5.7 --- --- 7,774

7 S7 ridge 481 --- 4.3 16.5 32.7 881 * These heights for the oblique wedge and tetrahedron represent the distance between the apex and the base (along a line perpendicular between the two)

Note that all numbers are rounded for presentation only. Decimal digits were retained during calculations.

Only the measurements necessary for estimating volumes are shown above.

S1

S2

S3

S4a

S5 S6 S7

N Aug 2011 Stockpile Shapes

2009 Air Photo (note change from 2009 to 2011)

S4b

S4c S4d


Recommended