Date post: | 23-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | dayna-richard |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Projecting Student EnrollmentProjecting Student Enrollment
MoAsboSpring Conference, 2001
Copies of all handouts/worksheets/presentation also found at Park Hill’s Web Site http://www.parkhill.k12.mo.us/moasbo
MoAsbo Spring Conference, 2001
Introductions & Agenda
Introduction– Presenter
Paul Kelly, Director Of Instructional TechnologyPark Hill School District, Kansas City, Missouri
– [email protected]– 816/741-1521
– Park Hill School District 9000 Students 13 Schools (+1 in construction)
MoAsbo Spring Conference, 2001
Introductions & Agenda
Agenda For PresentationAgenda For Presentation– Utility of Accurate Enrollment Projections
Why do School Districts Need to Project School Enrollment?
– Data needed for Enrollment Projecting Defining “Enrollment” Historical Enrollment Data County Population Data & Projections County/City Building Permit (Housing Starts) Reports Projection Methods
– Building the Report– Resources
UTILITY OF ACCURATE ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
Why Do Schools Need to Project School Enrollment?
Budgeting For Future Years Project Staffing Needs Anticipating Building Needs Benefits of “Demographic Profile
Report”
DATA NEEDED FOR ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
Getting Organized
Define Enrollment
Collect Current Data
Collect Historical Data
Decide on Projection Methodologies
Analyze Data
Build Report
DEFINING ENROLLMENT
What is Enrollment?
Enrollment (8858)*– Enrollment is a head count of all students registered for district programs.– Based upon enrollment on 4th Wednesday of September and January
Membership (8868)*– Includes all enrolled pupils plus students participating in external programs funded by the District
ADA (Average Daily Attendance) (8076)*– Average number of students who attended school on any given day during the school year
Other– FTE (Full Time Equivalent) (8544)*– Eligible Pupil
* PHSD 1999-200 Figures
COLLECTING DATA
Data Needed For Accurate Projections
Current & Historical Enrollment Data
Current & Historical County Population Statistics
Current & Historical Housing Data
Current & Historical Enrollment Current & Historical Enrollment DataData
Elementary Schools
Grade ChinnEnglish Landing Graden Line Creek
Prairie Point Renner Southeast
Union Chapel
DaySchool TOTAL
KN-FULL 0 62 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 63KN-AM 40 3 42 46 34 38 30 56 1 290KN-PM 39 0 38 45 43 37 17 37 0 256
KN-TOTAL 79 65 80 91 77 76 47 93 1 6091 70 75 102 87 86 87 63 97 2 6692 90 76 75 87 92 95 72 106 0 6933 83 75 89 92 107 99 61 101 1 7084 93 70 91 102 98 98 75 108 2 7375 82 85 94 82 99 101 67 88 0 698
TOTAL 497 446 531 541 559 556 385 593 6 4114
Middle Schools High School
Day Park Hill Park Hill DayGrade Congress Lakeview Plaza School TOTAL Grade High School South School TOTAL
6 227 259 185 3 674 9 388 361 9 7587 254 270 241 5 770 10 353 362 9 7248 248 227 182 4 661 11 365 374 9 748
TOTAL 729 756 608 12 2105 12 276 277 2 555
TOTAL 1382 1374 29 2785
Day School
PARK HILL Total (included
GRADE DAY SCHOOLin the above school District TotalK-12 47 numbers)
9004
Enrollment By Park Hill SchoolOfficial Count Day - September 2000
PAGE 9 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
CURRENT & HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT DATA
Enrollment by Grade Level
658
686 690
730
690
664
746
653
722710
742
611
556
609
669
693
708
737
698
674
770
661
758
724
748
555
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Grade Level
Stu
den
t E
nro
llm
ent
99-00 Enrollment 00-01 Enrollment
PAGE 10 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
Schools
En
rollm
en
t
1999-00 484 484 553 495 543 538 439 570 736 630 737 1250 1339 60
ChinnEnglish
LandingGraden Line Creek Prairie Point Renner Southeast Union Chapel Lakeview Plaza Congress
Park Hill High
School
Park Hill
SouthDay School
CURRENT & HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT DATA
Enrollment by School
NOT INCLUDED IN MO-ASBO HANDOUT
CURRENT & HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT DATA
Enrollment History
Year K 1 2 3 4 5Un-
gradedK-5
Total 6 7 8
Middle School Total 9 10 11 12
High School Total
Grand Total
Annual Increase/ Decrease
of Students
Cuml Inc/ Dec
%of Increase/ Decrease
1973-74 447 467 445 451 501 493 21 2825 534 505 483 1522 494 467 444 369 1774 6121
1974-75 491 457 461 450 451 521 26 2857 519 555 531 1605 517 497 470 409 1893 6355 234 234 3.8%
1975-76 498 533 474 468 465 489 39 2966 537 547 565 1649 559 547 482 438 2026 6641 286 520 4.5%
1976-77 504 525 555 491 493 460 38 3066 480 552 551 1583 560 549 528 438 2075 6724 83 603 1.2%
1977-78 458 513 533 543 483 472 60 3062 472 514 548 1534 544 573 493 476 2086 6682 -42 561 -0.6%
1978-79 442 499 535 552 560 489 64 3141 478 514 523 1515 587 533 564 425 2109 6765 83 644 1.2%
1979-80 463 444 491 524 529 557 77 3085 482 488 503 1473 532 566 513 480 2091 6649 -116 528 -1.7%
1980-81 390 467 433 484 540 530 40 2884 556 472 481 1509 504 539 544 451 2038 6431 -218 310 -3.3%
1981-82 417 414 465 435 488 539 44 2802 542 560 465 1567 513 514 513 499 2039 6408 -23 287 -0.4%
1982-83 422 395 386 473 438 476 39 2629 538 570 553 1661 471 524 477 463 1935 6225 -183 104 -2.9%
1983-84 380 455 386 394 473 431 39 2558 478 555 553 1586 555 502 511 433 2001 6145 -80 24 -1.3%
1984-85 471 432 437 401 419 486 29 2675 436 521 546 1503 577 582 483 441 2083 6261 116 140 1.9%
1985-86 464 493 442 472 412 435 42 2760 490 486 509 1485 577 593 569 422 2161 6406 145 285 2.3%
1986-87 464 483 525 483 503 432 54 2944 451 543 497 1491 543 602 559 499 2203 6638 232 517 3.6%
1987-88 468 516 492 537 504 527 43 3087 450 483 536 1469 526 547 570 543 2186 6742 104 621 1.6%
1988-89 475 514 529 496 556 527 0 3097 539 472 490 1501 556 515 540 565 2176 6774 32 653 0.5%
1989-90 552 530 517 557 511 571 28 3266 537 547 494 1578 517 567 503 531 2118 6962 188 841 2.8%
1990-91 537 590 532 514 573 523 10 3279 606 548 554 1708 518 531 548 505 2102 7089 127 968 1.8%
1991-92 557 613 589 552 523 597 11 3442 551 618 555 1724 603 516 501 546 2166 7332 243 1211 3.4%
1992-93 589 622 618 610 577 538 6 3560 643 585 633 1861 590 636 508 520 2254 7675 343 1554 4.7%
1993-94 642 601 621 619 647 595 0 3725 572 671 628 1871 639 585 574 519 2317 7913 238 1792 3.1%
1994-95 586 659 627 629 649 667 0 3817 615 575 671 1861 631 628 561 552 2372 8050 137 1929 1.7%
1995-96 623 630 695 621 646 636 0 3851 684 605 586 1875 687 633 631 543 2494 8220 170 2099 2.1%
1996-97 634 652 635 694 599 661 0 3875 635 709 595 1939 612 705 608 579 2504 8318 98 2197 1.2%
1997-98 667 670 651 634 713 603 0 3938 673 663 705 2041 617 627 692 557 2493 8472 154 2351 1.9%
1998-99 646 694 679 660 635 739 0 4053 642 697 665 2004 753 624 629 589 2595 8652 180 2531 2.1%
1999-00 658 686 690 730 690 664 0 4118 746 653 722 2121 710 742 611 556 2619 8858 206 2737 2.4%
2000-01 609 669 693 708 737 698 0 4114 674 770 661 2105 758 724 748 555 2785 9004 146 2883 1.6%
157 1.8%
192 2.4%
LAST 5 YEARS
LAST 10 YEARS
PAGE 15 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
CURRENT & HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT DATA
Enrollment Growth
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
8500
9000
1973
-74
1974
-75
1975
-76
1976
-77
1977
-78
1978
-79
1979
-80
1980
-81
1981
-82
1982
-83
1983
-84
1984
-85
1985
-86
1986
-87
1987
-88
1988
-89
1989
-90
1990
-91
1991
-92
1992
-93
1993
-94
1994
-95
1995
-96
1996
-97
1997
-98
1998
-99
1999
-00
2000
-01
School Year
Stu
de
nt
En
rollm
en
t
PAGE 16 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
CURRENT & HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT DATA
Enrollment Growth
PAGE 21 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
19
73
-74
19
74
-75
19
75
-76
19
76
-77
19
77
-78
19
78
-79
19
79
-80
19
80
-81
19
81
-82
19
82
-83
19
83
-84
19
84
-85
19
85
-86
19
86
-87
19
87
-88
19
88
-89
19
89
-90
19
90
-91
19
91
-92
19
92
-93
19
93
-94
19
94
-95
19
95
-96
19
96
-97
19
97
-98
19
98
-99
19
99
-00
20
00
-01
School Year
En
rollm
en
t G
row
th
0.0%
4.0%
8.0%
12.0%
16.0%
Mo
rtg
age
Inte
rest
Rat
es
Annual Increase/ Decrease of Students Mortgage Rate
Projection MethodologiesProjection Methodologies
PROJECTION METHODOLOGIES
Cohort Survival
“How many 6th Graders will be enrolled in Park Hill next year?– What I know:
698 5th graders were enrolled in 2000-2001 Based Upon Historical Enrollment Data I can calculate
“cohort survival” rates from 5th to 6th Grade
5th Grade Class 6th Grade Class Cohort Survival Rate
97/98 603 98/99 642 +6.5%
98/99 739 99/00 746 +1.0%
99/00 664 00/01 674 +1.5%
Average = 3.0%
STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
Enrollment History
Year K 1 2 3 4 5Un-
gradedK-5
Total 6 7 8
Middle School Total 9 10 11 12
High School Total
Grand Total
Annual Increase/ Decrease
of Students
Cuml Inc/ Dec
%of Increase/ Decrease
1973-74 447 467 445 451 501 493 21 2825 534 505 483 1522 494 467 444 369 1774 6121
1974-75 491 457 461 450 451 521 26 2857 519 555 531 1605 517 497 470 409 1893 6355 234 234 3.8%
1975-76 498 533 474 468 465 489 39 2966 537 547 565 1649 559 547 482 438 2026 6641 286 520 4.5%
1976-77 504 525 555 491 493 460 38 3066 480 552 551 1583 560 549 528 438 2075 6724 83 603 1.2%
1977-78 458 513 533 543 483 472 60 3062 472 514 548 1534 544 573 493 476 2086 6682 -42 561 -0.6%
1978-79 442 499 535 552 560 489 64 3141 478 514 523 1515 587 533 564 425 2109 6765 83 644 1.2%
1979-80 463 444 491 524 529 557 77 3085 482 488 503 1473 532 566 513 480 2091 6649 -116 528 -1.7%
1980-81 390 467 433 484 540 530 40 2884 556 472 481 1509 504 539 544 451 2038 6431 -218 310 -3.3%
1981-82 417 414 465 435 488 539 44 2802 542 560 465 1567 513 514 513 499 2039 6408 -23 287 -0.4%
1982-83 422 395 386 473 438 476 39 2629 538 570 553 1661 471 524 477 463 1935 6225 -183 104 -2.9%
1983-84 380 455 386 394 473 431 39 2558 478 555 553 1586 555 502 511 433 2001 6145 -80 24 -1.3%
1984-85 471 432 437 401 419 486 29 2675 436 521 546 1503 577 582 483 441 2083 6261 116 140 1.9%
1985-86 464 493 442 472 412 435 42 2760 490 486 509 1485 577 593 569 422 2161 6406 145 285 2.3%
1986-87 464 483 525 483 503 432 54 2944 451 543 497 1491 543 602 559 499 2203 6638 232 517 3.6%
1987-88 468 516 492 537 504 527 43 3087 450 483 536 1469 526 547 570 543 2186 6742 104 621 1.6%
1988-89 475 514 529 496 556 527 0 3097 539 472 490 1501 556 515 540 565 2176 6774 32 653 0.5%
1989-90 552 530 517 557 511 571 28 3266 537 547 494 1578 517 567 503 531 2118 6962 188 841 2.8%
1990-91 537 590 532 514 573 523 10 3279 606 548 554 1708 518 531 548 505 2102 7089 127 968 1.8%
1991-92 557 613 589 552 523 597 11 3442 551 618 555 1724 603 516 501 546 2166 7332 243 1211 3.4%
1992-93 589 622 618 610 577 538 6 3560 643 585 633 1861 590 636 508 520 2254 7675 343 1554 4.7%
1993-94 642 601 621 619 647 595 0 3725 572 671 628 1871 639 585 574 519 2317 7913 238 1792 3.1%
1994-95 586 659 627 629 649 667 0 3817 615 575 671 1861 631 628 561 552 2372 8050 137 1929 1.7%
1995-96 623 630 695 621 646 636 0 3851 684 605 586 1875 687 633 631 543 2494 8220 170 2099 2.1%
1996-97 634 652 635 694 599 661 0 3875 635 709 595 1939 612 705 608 579 2504 8318 98 2197 1.2%
1997-98 667 670 651 634 713 603 0 3938 673 663 705 2041 617 627 692 557 2493 8472 154 2351 1.9%
1998-99 646 694 679 660 635 739 0 4053 642 697 665 2004 753 624 629 589 2595 8652 180 2531 2.1%
1999-00 658 686 690 730 690 664 0 4118 746 653 722 2121 710 742 611 556 2619 8858 206 2737 2.4%
2000-01 609 669 693 708 737 698 0 4114 674 770 661 2105 758 724 748 555 2785 9004 146 2883 1.6%
157 1.8%
192 2.4%
LAST 5 YEARS
LAST 10 YEARS
PAGE 15 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
PROJECTION METHODOLOGIES
Cohort Survival
“How many 6th Graders will be enrolled in Park Hill next year?
698 5th Graders in 2000-01
x +3.0% Cohort Survival Rate
= 21 Additional Students
Projecting 719 6th Graders During 2000-01 School Year
PROJECTION METHODOLOGIES
Cohort Survival
Cohort Survival– Cohort survival is a measure of the rate at which students grouped by grade
level pass into the next grade level a year later.– To minimize the effects of an exceptional year, three and seven year cohorts
are calculated by averaging the cohort survival for three and seven years respectively.
– Park Hill utilizes two Cohort SurvivalMethods : 3 Year Cohort Data & 7Year Cohort Data
Growth From. . . 3-YEAR 7-YEAR
Kindergarten to 1st 3.97% 4.63%
1st to 2nd 0.60% 1.75%
2nd to 3rd 3.83% 1.65%
3rd to 4th 1.89% 1.77%
4th to 5th 0.15% 0.16%
5th to 6th 2.97% 2.36%
6th to 7th 2.83% 2.21%
7th to 8th 1.70% 0.69%
8th to 9th 6.19% 4.22%
9th to 10th 0.55% 0.76%
10th to 11th -0.32% -1.48%
11th to 12th -11.89% -8.48%
U
PAGE 26 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
PROJECTION METHODOLOGIES
Cohort Survival
Cohort Survival– One problem with Cohort Survival is that there is no way to predict
Kindergarten enrollment because there is no preceding grade.– Park Hill has utilized “Live Birth” Data From Platte County
Birth Data
http://www.health.state.mo.us
PAGE 26 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
Year Live Births
Change From Previous
Years
Year of Kindergarten Enrollment
Kindergarten Class Size
% of Platte County Live
Births as Park Hill Kindergarten
Students1993 935 38 1998 646 69.1%1994 901 -34 1999 658 73.0%1995 869 -32 2000 609 70.1%
PROJECTION METHODOLOGIES
Cohort Survival
By calculating the % of births 5 years earlier, upcoming Kindergarten class sizes can be “projected”
PAGE 26 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
Year Live Births
Change From Previous
Years
Year of Kindergarten Enrollment
Kindergarten Class Size
% of Platte County Live
Births as Park Hill Kindergarten
Students1993 935 38 1998 646 69.1%1994 901 -34 1999 658 73.0%1995 869 -32 2000 609 70.1%1996 961 92 2001 674 70.1%1997 1006 45 2002 668 66.4%1998 985 -21 2003 687 69.7%1999 1004 19 2004 663 66.0%2000 1016 12 2005 704 69.3%2001 1028 12 2006 674 65.6%2002 1040 12 2007 717 68.9%2003 1052 12 2008 686 65.2%2004 1064 12 2009 729 68.5%2005 1076 12 2010 697 64.8%2006 1088 12 2011 754 69.3%
* PROJECTED VALUES
STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
Cohort Projections
Year Elementary Total Middle School Total High School Total Grand Total
1997-98 3938 2041 2493 8472
1998-99 4053 2004 2595 8652
1999-00 4118 2121 2619 8858
2000-01 4167 2114 2752 9033
2001-02 4212 2197 2821 9230
2002-03 4212 2221 2911 9344
2003-04 4227 2291 2952 9470
2004-05 4247 2329 2980 9556
2005-06 4275 2312 3120 9707
2006-07 4336 2294 3133 9763
2007-08 4383 2306 3200 9889
2008-09 4428 2324 3240 9992
2009-10 4494 2360 3200 10054
2010-11 4570 2372 3211 10153
Year Elementary Total Middle School Total High School Total Grand Total
1997-98 3938 2041 2493 8472
1998-99 4053 2004 2595 8652
1999-00 4118 2121 2619 8858
2000-01 4162 2111 2750 9023
2001-02 4201 2188 2801 9190
2002-03 4196 2212 2867 9275
2003-04 4218 2269 2891 9378
2004-05 4234 2306 2912 9452
2005-06 4260 2284 3048 9592
2006-07 4320 2272 3047 9639
2007-08 4366 2278 3110 9754
2008-09 4411 2296 3146 9853
2009-10 4478 2330 3102 9910
2010-11 4554 2341 3117 10012
3-Year Cohort
7-Year Cohort
PROJECTION METHODOLOGIES
Household Data
Household– Enrollment projections, based on households, provide an
opportunity to determine student enrollment further in the future. Part of the downfall to this approach is the projection of both households in the district as well as the number of school age children in each household.
YearElementary Students
Middle Students High Students District Total
Number of Households
Annual Change in
Households
Students Per
Household
1989 3266 1578 2118 6962 16242 326 0.42864181990 3279 1708 2102 7089 16642 400 0.42597041991 3442 1724 2166 7332 17068 426 0.42957581992 3560 1861 2254 7675 17616 548 0.43568351993 3725 1871 2317 7913 18091 475 0.43739981994 3817 1861 2372 8050 18649 558 0.43165851995 3851 1875 2494 8220 19119 470 0.42993881996 3875 1939 2504 8318 19658 539 0.42313561997 3938 2041 2493 8472 20535 877 0.41256391998 4053 2004 2595 8652 21265 730 0.40686571999 4118 2121 2619 8858 22137 872 0.4001446
PAGE 22 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
PROJECTION METHODOLOGIES
Household Data
Collecting New Household Data
PAGE 19 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
MunicipalitySingle Family
Multi Family Total
Single Family
Multi Family Total
Single Family
Multi Family Total
Kansas City 299 328 627 295 426 721 228 50 278Parkville 40 0 40 90 0 90 108 0 108
Platte County 171 0 171 234 0 234 200 0 200Riverside 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 2
Weatherby Lake 10 0 10 5 0 5 2 0 2Platte County Adjustment -118 -167 -146
TOTAL 730 884 444
1998 1999 2000
PROJECTION METHODOLOGIES
Household Data
As the district continues to increase households, the number of students per household multiplied by the projected households will provide an enrollment projection. The make these projections the following steps are followed:
1. Project the number of households in the Park Hill School District based upon historical growth.
2. Project the number of students per household based upon historical growth.
3. Calculate district enrollment based upon the above two projections.
4. Distribute the enrollment across Elementary, Middle and High School levels according to historical distribution.
YearElementary Students
Middle Students High Students District Total
Number of Households
Annual Change in
Households
Students Per
Household
46% 24% 31% 100%2001 4267 2208 2878 9354 23509 500 0.39790722002 4296 2223 2897 9417 24065 556 0.39132512003 4331 2242 2921 9494 24677 612 0.3847432004 4372 2263 2949 9584 25345 668 0.37816092005 4419 2287 2981 9687 26069 724 0.37157882006 4471 2314 3015 9800 26849 780 0.36499672007 4527 2343 3053 9923 27685 836 0.35841462008 4587 2374 3093 10054 28577 892 0.35183262009 4651 2407 3137 10194 29525 948 0.34525052010 4717 2441 3181 10339 30529 1004 0.3386684
1 234
PROJECTION METHODOLOGIES
Method Comparisons
School Year3-Year
Projections7-Year
ProjectionsHousehold Projections
3-Year Projections
7-Year Projections
Household Projections
3-Year Projections
7-Year Projections
Household Projections
3-Year Projections
7-Year Projections
Household Projections
2001-02 4159 4155 4267 2195 2178 2208 2845 2851 2878 9199 9184 93532002-03 4161 4151 4296 2204 2179 2223 2933 2908 2897 9298 9238 94162003-04 4194 4182 4331 2277 2246 2242 2959 2910 2921 9430 9338 94942004-05 4193 4197 4372 2316 2266 2263 3005 2922 2949 9514 9385 95842005-06 4256 4266 4419 2289 2232 2287 3132 3033 2981 9677 9531 96872006-07 4331 4339 4471 2240 2181 2314 3136 3025 3015 9707 9545 98002007-08 4374 4383 4527 2251 2206 2343 3221 3086 3053 9846 9675 99232008-09 4394 4403 4587 2280 2239 2374 3233 3089 3093 9907 9731 100542009-10 4435 4446 4651 2372 2328 2407 3162 3018 3137 9970 9793 101952010-11 4475 4486 4717 2360 2317 2441 3188 3042 3181 10023 9845 10339
Grand TotalElementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools
PAGE 33 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
ANALYZING THE DATA
Getting Organized
Define Enrollment
Collect Current Data
Collect Historical Data
Decide on Projection Methodologies
Analyze DataBuild Report
ANALYZING THE DATA
Elementary Building Need
3000
3200
3400
3600
3800
4000
4200
4400
4600
4800
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
School Year
Pro
ject
ed E
lem
enta
ry S
tud
ent
En
rollm
ent
3-Year Projections 7-Year Projections Household Projections
8 ElementaryEffective Capacity(4184)
9 ElementaryEffective Capacity(4707)
PAGE 35 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
ANALYZING THE DATA
Middle School Building Need
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
School Year
Pro
ject
ed M
idd
le S
cho
ol E
nro
llmen
t
3-Year Projections 7-Year Projections Household Projections
3 Middle SchoolEffective Capacity(2688)
PAGE 36 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
ANALYZING THE DATA
High School Building Need
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
3200
3400
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
School Year
Pro
jec
ted
Hig
h S
ch
oo
l En
rollm
en
t
3-Year Projections 7-Year Projections Household Projections
2 High SchoolEffective Capacity(3240)
PAGE 37 of MO-ASBO HANDOUT
BUILDING THE REPORT
Getting Organized
Define Enrollment
Collect Current Data
Collect Historical Data
Decide on Projection Methodologies
Analyze Data
Build Report
BUILDING THE REPORT
“Demographic Profile”
Final report is prepared in Microsoft Word using graphs, tables and charts from Microsoft Excel.
– Displayed on Internet as Adobe Acrobat (PDF) File
Report also includes– Demographic Comparisons (Community & School)
http://oseda.missouri.edu
– Governor’s Report Card http://www.dese.state.mo.us
– Maps– Definitions
ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
Questions?