+ All Categories
Home > Technology > Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Date post: 13-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: jenny-chen
View: 5,692 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
Popular Tags:
39
1
Transcript
Page 2: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

I. Introduction

II. Literature Review

III. Methodology

2

Page 3: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Research Background

Lukang

Statements of Problem

Purposes of Research

3

Page 4: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Nearly 91% of the citizens traveled at least once

domestically in 2007, and the average number of

trips per person was 5.57.

(R.O.C. Tourism Bureau, 2008)

4

Page 5: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

The percentage of Taiwanese citizens who

preferred visiting cultural and historical sites as a

cultural experiencing activity was increasing.

(R.O.C. Tourism Bureau, 2008)

5

Page 6: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Distinct benefits of historical tourism include the

potential of a clean industry and a valuable

source of income and employment.

(Orbasli, 2000)

6

Page 7: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Interpretation allows visitors to generate a better

understanding of the history and significance of

events, people, and objects with which the site is

associated.

(Alderson & Low, 1996)

7

Page 8: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Interpretation is one of the key factors to a

sustainable tourism.

(Harris, Griffin, & Williams, 2002)

8

Page 11: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

11

Primary historic heritage 1

Tertiary heritage sites 6

Valuable heritage sites 7

Designated Heritage Sites in Lukang

Page 12: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Only few of the past studies have examined the

need for interpretative services and the value of

these services to visitors in heritage sites.

12

Page 13: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

By probing the visiting patterns and the

perceptions of the tourists, more could be

considered to increase satisfaction of the

tourists, and may further increase

revisitation.

13

Page 14: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

to use the contingent valuation method (CVM)

to estimate the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of the

tourists for interpretative service in Lukang,

and to analyze the WTP determinants

14

Page 15: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

To determine:

1. the perceptions of tourists on interpretative service in Lukang

2. the tourists’ willingness-to-pay for interpretative service in Lukang

3. the WTP value for interpretative service in Lukang

4. the WTP determinants

5. implications and suggestions15

Page 16: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Interpretative Service

Contingent Valuation Method

16

Page 17: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Interpretation is an educational activity which

aims to reveal meanings and relationships to

people about the places they visit and the things

they see, which in turn improves the quality of

visitor experience.

(Tilden, 1977)

17

Page 18: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

The goal of interpretation is to increase visitor

awareness, promote learning, appreciation and

understanding of places so that tourists develop

empathy towards heritage, conservation, culture

and landscape.

(Stewart, Hayward, & Devlin, 1998)

18

Page 19: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Interpretation services benefit both the heritage

sites and tourists and draw public support by

enhancing visitors’ experiences and educating

visitors in appropriate behaviors to conserve the

historical sites.

(Hall & McArthur, 1993)

19

Page 20: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Personal/

Attended

Non-

personal/

Unattended

20

Page 21: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

21

Personal Interpretative Service

diverse audience

needs

more interaction

entertaining and

memorable

notice problems

Page 22: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

The contingent valuation method (CVM) is a

standard approach to measuring economic

values of non-market goods, such as recreation

resources, wildlife, and environmental quality

goods.

(Hanemann, 1994; Lee & Han, 2002) 22

Page 23: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Elicitation techniques:

bidding game approach

payment card approach

dichotomous choice approach (DC)

open-ended elicitation technique

23

Page 24: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

bidding game approach

Yes Yes Yes No

market-like high cost and time-consuming starting–point bias

24

$100

$200

$300

$400

Page 25: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

payment card approach

reduces starting-point bias may not reflect true value order bias

25

$ 1 0 0 $ 2 0 0 $ 3 0 0 $ 4 0 0

Page 26: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

dichotomous choice approach (DC)

easy to answer starting-point bias ‘yea-saying’ problem

26

$ 300Yes

No

Page 27: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

open-ended elicitation technique If……, how much are you willing to

pay for _______?

reduces starting-point bias convenient/less time-

consuming reflect true value non-response

27

Page 28: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Possible biases:

starting-point bias

sequencing effect

information effect

hypothetical bias

strategic bias

28

Page 29: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Research Procedures

Instrument

Data Collection

Data Analysis

29

Page 30: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Designing questionnaire

Conducting formal study

Analyzing data

30

Revising the questionnaire

Collecting Data

Page 31: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

questionnaire survey

Part 1 Personal Interpretative Services

Part 2 Lukang Traveling Experiences

Part 3Willingness-to-Pay for Personal Interpretative Service in Lukang

Part 4 Personal Information

31

Page 32: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

32

ParticipantsTourists who have visited Lukang (on-site)

Questionnaires 500 copies

Time 10 minutes

Duration 2 months

Elicitation approach

Open-ended

Page 33: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

33

Page 34: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Box-Cox double-hurdle model

34

Yes NoInterpretati

ve perceptions

Lukang traveling

experience Socio-economic

status

Interpretative

perceptions

Lukang traveling

experience Socio-economic

status

Page 35: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Box-Cox double-hurdle model

35

Level of WTP (price)

Interpretative

perceptions

Lukang traveling

experience

Socio-economic

status

Page 36: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Decision to participate in the market (D)

(1)

D* : participation variable

Z : vector of characteristics

α : vector of parameters

u : error term

36

Page 37: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

The level of participation (Y)

(2)

Yi : answer to the open-ended valuation question

X : vector of individual’s characteristics β : vector of parameters Vi : error term

37

Page 38: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Di* = α + β1SEX + β2INC + β3FRE + β4IMP + Vi

D* : participation variable

α, β1, β2, …., β4 : coefficients

Vi : error term

SEX: gender

INC: income

FRE: number of previous visits to Lukang

IMP: importance of interpretation

38

Page 39: Proposal Defense Oral Presentation

Thank you for your attention!

39


Recommended